HOLOCAUST SURVIVOR INNA ZHVANETSKAYA STILL NOT SAFE FROM INCARCERATION AND FORCED VACCINATION

INTERVIEW WITH ZHVANETSKAYA’S LAWYER HOLGER FISCHER

By Robert Hoeschele and Andrew Barr

The case of the 85-year-old composer Inna Zhvanetskaya has attracted a lot of attention because of the decision last month of a court in Stuttgart in Germany that she should be incarcerated in a psychiatric hospital or secure care home, where she was to be forcibly vaccinated against COVID-19, against her will.

This treatment by the German authorities of a Holocaust survivor evokes obvious parallels with the incarceration of Jews in Nazi Germany and their subjection to forced medical experiments (the origin of the Nuremberg Code).

Currently Zhvanetskaya is in hiding from the authorities, while her lawyer Holger Fischer has managed to obtain an order from a higher court to stay the vaccination, pending the result of an appeal against the decision of the original court. Contrary to claims on social media that the original decision has been overturned, Zhvanetskaya has merely been given a temporary reprieve.

Full details are given in an interview that Fischer gave to Alexander Wallasch, reproduced below in an English translation by Uwe Alschner.

In this interview, Fischer is highly critical of the original decision: ‘This decision is so lousy, it has gross errors in so many places, that the regional court probably couldn’t help but say, “We have to suspend it.” Let me give you an example. The decision has a statement of reasons, the so-called “grounds”. But no reason is given why a compulsory vaccination is necessary. It doesn’t say why. There is nothing there. That is such an obvious error.

‘I don’t know what is going on in the mind of this judge. I can only say that I have never read such a decision on compulsory vaccination. The legislation in this case, Section 1906 of the German Civil Code, was originally intended for people who have to be treated with psychotropic drugs in a psychiatric hospital. And you will not find – certainly not from the Federal Supreme Court – any case law on compulsory vaccination. There’s nothing there.

‘We are moving here into something that is newly blossoming. In Stuttgart, where other strange decisions are made, it is said that they are necessary because we are in COVID times. I have often experienced the phenomenon that, because of COVID, one suddenly deviates from a decision-making tradition or from a legal practice that one has cultivated with great care for years.’

Fischer also expresses his concern about the failure of the court to realise the historical resonance of forcing medical treatment upon a Jewish person in Germany, against her will:

‘The court has put its foot in its mouth here. And the giant fetlock is the Jewish origin. Possible childhood trauma as a result of her Jewish origin cannot be ruled out.

‘Why isn’t the court sensing that? And why is there so little awareness in Germany in the meantime? Why is there so little sensitivity? That is where I would then say, “There is the scandal.”

‘And you have to say to Germans: “You don’t have any sensitivity, and yet you all said that you had learned from the German past. But that’s not the impression we get.”

https://t.me/robinmg/25891

My next film as executive producer... #JacindaArdern

Robin

https://t.me/River_of_Freedom/9

Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen vaccine InflammoThrombotic and Prion Type Effect on Erythrocytes When Added to Human Blood

"Administration of Pfizer, Moderna, and Janssen vaccines resulted in the immediate loss of red coloration present in erythrocytes. This loss of red coloration indicates that there is a disruption of the hemoglobin binding of oxygen. Since
atmospheric oxygen is immediately available to re-saturate the hemoglobin molecules restoring the red color..; the results of this investigation suggest that there is an alteration in the hemoglobin
molecule preventing the hemoglobin from binding with oxygen. This alteration of the hemoglobin molecule could be explained if the vaccines merge with the erythrocytes and release their genetic material (RNA or DNA) directly into the erythrocytes; having a prion altering effect upon the hemoglobin molecule. Some of the vaccine samples included extraneous materials. The vaccines did not include observable graphene oxide, eggs or living organism"

THE BIG ONE!
TRUTH BE TOLD
LONDON
SATURDAY 21ST JAN
1PM
BBC PORTLAND PLACE

DR MIKE YEADON EX VP AND CHIEF SCIENTIST OF PFIZER SUPPORTS TRUTH BE TOLD!

BRING THE NOISE as John Watt would say!
Meet at BBC Broadcasting House where you will hear the voices of the Injured and Bereaved. We have a few surprises on the day including a BIG OUTDOOR SCREEN!

SILENT MEMORIAL PROCESSION
Following the rally we will be leading a short silent memorial processesion in memory of those we have lost and for those whose lives have changed forever. For this PLEASE BRING ONE WHITE ROSE/FLOWER and if you choose to, PLEASE WEAR BLACK.

Can you help us by donating?

fund.freewick.com/campaign/3/truth-be-told

Thank You 🙏

NEW - Tony Blair calls for "digital infrastructures" to monitor who is vaccinated and who is not for the "vaccines that will come down the line" at Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum.

@disclosetv

US VAERS to 6th January 2023

33,591 Covid-19 injection related deaths and over 7.2 million injuries now reported by over 1.6 million people – Per VAERS database.

Table shows latest deaths and injuries by injection brand reported in the US

Only 1-10% reported

Link to data: https://www.openvaers.com/

EU/ USA /UK Combined– Covid Injection Harm

Table shows by Covid injection brand the deaths reported after injection.

86,005 deaths, plus almost 14 million injuries now reported by over 4.2 million people following a Covid-19 injection in EU/ UK/ US

Data –Dec/ January 2023.

Only 1-10% Reported

Link to US ADR Data: https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
EUdraVigilance covers EEA countries and also some non EEA countries.

Link to the EU database: http://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#/

Link to the UK ADR’s by the MHRA: https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/idaps

EU – Covid-19 Injection Harm -14th January 2023

EU to 14th January 2023 – 50,010 Covid-19 injection deaths and over 5.2 million injuries, reported by almost 2.2 million people per EudraVigilance Database.

Table shows a summary of the injuries and fatalities now reported by almost 2.2 million people in the EU.

Over 41.5k reports of children harmed in the EU and over 135k reports where the age is not recorded/ unknown.

Covid-19 Injection harm reported in the EU on the following:
1. Moderna (Elasomeran)
2. Moderna (Original/Omicron BA.1) (Elasomeran, Imelasomeran)
3. Moderna (Original/Omicron BA.4-5) (Elasomeran, Davesomeran)
4. Pfizer (Tozinameran)
5. Pfizer (Original Omicron BA 1) (Tozinameran, Riltozinameran)
6. Pfizer (Original Omicron BA 4-5) (Tozinameran, Famtozinameran)
7. AstraZeneca
8. Janssen
9. Novavax
10. Valneva (no data presented)

Only 1-10% reported

Link to EU Data: https://www.adrreports.eu/en/search_subst.html#

Covid vaccines warped model

Injured people mean big business for Big Pharma

‘Is curing patients a sustainable business model?’ That’s what Goldman Sachs analysts asked in an April 2018 report on ‘The Genome Revolution’. The analysts didn’t think so, arguing that there was little money to be made on ‘one shot cures’. But there is endless money to be made from chronically injured people, they argued."

https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/01/covids-warped-model/

🇮🇹 Italians deface Central Health Building of Torrenova with blood red spray paint.

"Vax=Death"
"Pro-vaxx doctors are murderers"
"Sudden deaths are from the vaccines"
"Live free"

Kudos to Jenn Sharp and her brilliant new film, Anecdotals... #covid19 #booster
Film director behind documentary exposing adverse reactions to vaccines speaks out https://www.foxnews.com/video/6318719174112… #FoxNews

@AseemMalhotra

“I cry out for help on social media and I am silenced. I got the jab to keep my job and I can no longer work.” -Dedra L.

Ron DeSantis gives the injured a voice!

@AseemMalhotra

"The MHRA said: “All the Covid vaccines and therapeutics authorisation decisions were taken by the Licensing Minister and were not delegated.”
What makes this so interesting is the wider context. Under the Human Medicines Regulations, the Licensing Authority is the Secretary of State for Health. He or she delegates to MHRA all the work associated with that – licensing of medicines, pharmacovigilance, inspection of manufacturers, enforcement and so on. 
But for the Covid vaccines, MHRA is saying that the Secretary of State personally took all the decisions."

Blame Game Begins as MHRA Passes the Buck: "All the Covid Vaccine Authorisation Decisions Were Taken by the Government Minister" – The Daily Sceptic
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/01/19/blame-game-begins-as-mhra-passes-the-buck-all-the-covid-vaccine-authorisation-decisions-were-taken-by-the-government-minister/

Moderna/Pfizer’s C19-V clinical trials involving children identified elevated rate of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). FDA's vaccine committee even voiced concerns. RSV now spiking in children. CDC's befuddling advice on RSV is to recommend more C19-V.

https://icandecide.org/press-release/ican-demands-answers-from-the-cdc-about-spike-in-rsv-rates/

The principal business model of Big Pharma is to cause long term injury in as many people as possible while maintaining plausible deniability & avoiding fines. This applies to all vaccines & mRNA gene modifications

What really struck me in the last few years is how naïve, gullible & prone to manipulation the majority are. I blame this on the lack of a spiritual anchoring.

This applies to Covid19, vaccines, CO2, Ukraine, Russia, & beyond. A continuous manipulation at the service of the profit of the oligarchy, aided & abetted by corporate media & television, vacuous celebrities & misinformed & manipulated influencers thinking they are doing good..

If the God within is dead (Nietzsche), then the belief in all forms of propaganda is alive & well..

@RobinMG

Covid’s warped model
Injured people mean big business for Big Pharma

Injured people mean big business for Big Pharma

"‘Is curing patients a sustainable business model?’ That’s what Goldman Sachs analysts asked in an April 2018 report on ‘The Genome Revolution’. The analysts didn’t think so, arguing that there was little money to be made on ‘one shot cures’. But there is endless money to be made from chronically injured people, they argued.

A recent report analysing Bureau of Labor Statistics in the US up to November 2022 by the Phinance Technologies Team shows a dramatic increase in disabilities in people aged 16-64 which coincides with the rollout of the vaccines. Treating those people will certainly be a viable business model for Big Pharma for the foreseeable future."

https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/01/covids-warped-model/

SPARS PANDEMIC SCENARIO

VACCINE INJURY
CHAPTER SEVENTEEN

"In contrast to Alyssa Karpowitz’s story, not all changes in opinion were in favor of public health
messaging. As time passed and more people across the United States were vaccinated, claims of
adverse side effects began to emerge. Several parents claimed that their children were experiencing
neurological symptoms similar to those seen among livestock exposed to the GMI vaccine. By May
2027, parental anxiety around this claim had intensified to the point of lawsuits. That month, a group
of parents whose children developed mental retardation as a result of encephalitis in the wake of
Corovax vaccination sued the federal government, demanding removal of the liability shield protecting
the pharmaceutical companies responsible for developing and manufacturing Corovax.
The growing plaintiff cohort quickly withdrew their suit upon learning that the National Vaccine
Injury Compensation Trust Fund (NVICTF) and an emergency appropriation of funds authorized by
Congress under the PREP Act existed to provide financial reimbursement to those who were adversely
affected by the Corovax vaccine in order to cover healthcare costs and other related expenses.2,3 Given
the positive reaction to the federal government’s response and the fact that the majority of US citizens
willing to be vaccinated had already been immunized, the negative publicity surrounding adverse
reactions had little effect on nationwide vaccination rates. The focus on adverse side effects, however,
resulted in a considerable increase in the number of compensation claims filed, and many grew
concerned about the long-term effects that Corovax could have on their health. This concern was
particularly high among some African American parents who continued to question the government’s
motives regarding the Corovax vaccination campaign.
While the FDA, CDC, and other agencies were busy researching possible connections between
Corovax and the reported neurological side effects, their efforts were continually undermined by
epidemiological analyses produced by various non-governmental individuals and groups. A popular
Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security Page 59 The SPARS Pandemic

C H A P T E R S E V E N T E E N
science blogger EpiGirl, for example, began posting interactive maps of the incidence of Corovax side
effects in April 2027. To create the maps, EpiGirl collected anecdotes of adverse Corovax side effects
using Facebook, Twitter and YouTube and combined them with data downloaded from the HHS
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a national vaccine safety surveillance program
maintained by the CDC and FDA. EpiGirl also encouraged those among her subscribers who were
Apple product users to share health data with her via Apple’s ResearchKit and HealthKit applications.
EpiGirl’s maps were consequently shared widely in social media circles and even included in local and
national news reports.
The federal government became concerned about the validity of EpiGirl’s anecdotal data and the
widespread sharing of patient information via the internet. EpiGirl’s data showed a significantly higher
incidence rate of nearly every reported side effect; however, federal officials believed that this was
largely due to duplicate entries resulting from compiling data from multiple sources. Additionally,
EpiGirl’s data did not seek to address the cause of the reported side effects, only the incidence rate.
Publication of similar results from organizations such as Patients-Like-Me, a group closely associated
with the natural medicine movement, further legitimized these independent reports. The government
attempted to respond to these claims through formal press releases, but these were neither as visually
appealing nor as interactive as EpiGirl’s maps and were, therefore, largely ignored.
While the federal government appeared to have appropriately addressed concerns around the acute
side effects of Corovax, the long-term, chronic effects of the vaccine were still largely unknown.
Nearing the end of 2027, reports of new neurological symptoms began to emerge. After showing no
adverse side effects for nearly a year, several vaccine recipients slowly began to experience symptoms
such as blurry vision, headaches, and numbness in their extremities. Due to the small number of these
cases, the significance of their association with Corovax was never determined. As of this writing in
2030, longitudinal studies initiated by the NIH at the beginning of the vaccination program have not
reached the next round of data collection, so formal analysis on these symptoms has not yet been
conducted. Furthermore, these cases arose from the initial cohort of vaccine recipients—those in highrisk populations, including those with other underlying health conditions—making it increasingly
difficult to determine the extent to which these symptoms are associated with vaccination.

As these cases emerged, patients began filing for compensation under the PREP Act. Due to lingering
uncertainties over possible links between vaccination and reported neurological symptoms, their
compensation requests were placed on indefinite hold, pending further data analysis. This cohort,
many of whom adamantly supported the Corovax vaccine initially, quickly took to social media to
publicize their issues. "

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2017/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf

SPARS PANDEMIC SCENARIO
ANTIBIOTICS, HO!
CHAPTER SIXTEEN

"A new challenge soon emerged, however: antibiotic shortages. In late 2026, at the height of the cold
and flu season, bacterial pneumonia cases were on the rise across the country. Epidemiologic evidence
later indicated that thirty to forty percent of children and ten to twenty percent of adults developed
secondary bacterial pneumonia approximately four to eight months after initial SPARS infections.
Luckily, most of these infections were easily treated with antibiotics. By February 2027, however,
antibiotic supplies in the United States were running low. In an effort to combat the shortage, HHS
Secretary Nagel authorized deployments of antibiotics from the SNS to supplement health care
systems across the country.

The oldest lots of antibiotics in the SNS were originally scheduled to expire in 2021, but those
expiration dates had been extended multiple times through the Shelf Life Extension Program (SLEP).
Tests conducted in August 2026 showed continued potency of the drugs in 95% of those lots, and all
viable lots were granted another two-year extension, postponing their expiration from 2027 to 2029.
This was the first set of tests indicating any degradation in those lots of antibiotics, and both the Office
of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) and the CDC recommended
purchasing additional inventory to replace the expiring lots by 2030. The most recent tests (conducted
in February 2028) assessed that 94% of the remaining lots due to expire in 2029 remained sufficiently
effective. Federal authorities decided to deploy these lots first to ensure adequate public uptake before
the drugs expired.

Despite proactive efforts to address public concern over the use of antibiotics from the SNS, rumors
about the effectiveness of the drugs spread quickly. Inaccurate local news broadcasts and social media
messages asserted that the government was distributing expired antibiotics, and concerned citizens,
particularly parents of young children, began calling their healthcare providers, pharmacists, and local
health departments to seek clarification. While many of these parents’ fears were alleviated when they
learned about the distinction between shelf life extension and expiration, the effort required to convey
this message to parents on an individual basis proved overwhelming for local health authorities."

https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2017/spars-pandemic-scenario.pdf