TONIGHT at 10:20 PM on Z1TV www.z1tv.hr/hr/livestream Professor Richard Werner, TOPICS: CBDC, how inflation really came about, how money is created.

SEPARATION OF HEALTH & STATE:

Public health as an arm of the state is a failed and clearly obsolete centralised project which only benefits state control & pharmaceutical corporations. Health should be individual-focused, not public, and managed at a micro-local level. The only public areas that are necessary are clean water, air, nutrition and sanitation.

The idea is that it's not managed by the state at a central level. It's managed at a micro-local level. A network of community centred health hubs. LHS (Local not National) rather than NHS. This is to do with avoiding central management. Funding is not the issue. It can be funded locally, by the state or both. Nobody is advocating private funding unless it's local community funding and that expense comes from local not centralised taxation.

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1702596080288870576

https://youtu.be/Kp24lm2xC1E?si=H8ffI2TKLy4aqio6

I cannot recommend this highly enough. THIS is what sits behind everything that’s happening. I think there may be additional factors & motivations, but these (money & control) motives are sufficient to drive it all.

Please watch & share the unbelievable truth.

I’ve verified many parts of this separately, but I’d never seen it all lined up like this.

Best wishes
Mike

Despite the focus by economists worldwide on central bankers' interest rate policy (verging on obsession), the argument that lower interest rates lead to higher growth is fundamentally flawed!

Richard looks at the empirical evidence and concludes something entirely different... 👀

Click below to know more than 99% of economists! 👇

https://youtu.be/QbJ2TVN2sFE?si=uy9YM5qIVOOatFpk

🐶Neil Oliver: "Climate propaganda is climate fraud. The climate has always changed and always will regardless of human activities".
🙏Treat us with a coffee☕️ https://www.buymeacoffee.com/slobodnipoI archeologist and GB NEWS journalist is one of the loudest in asking uncomfortable questions about topics pushed by the mainstream in Great Britain and thus in the whole western world. He believes that they are trying to impose neo-feudalism on us. If we do not actively oppose it, they will surely succeed.
You can follow the SHOW via livestream - www.z1tv.hr/hr/livestream
CHANNEL of the show "SLOBODNI" with all episodes - https://rumble.com/user/SLOBODNIpodcast
https://bit.ly/YouTubeSLOBODNIpodcast
Join http://t.me/andrijaklaric
Follow https://twitter.com/andrija_klaric
https://bit.ly/facebookandrijaklaric
https://instagram.com/andrijaklaric/
https://www.tiktok.com/@slobodni_podcast
https://app.clouthub.com/#/users/u/SLOBODNIpodcast
https://www.winn.press/

How Belief in Science Stripped Morality from Truth

If we go back before Descartes, what do we have? We have Christianity. And in Christianity, truth was understood as a belief in a certain set of moral teachings as codified in very specific books. That was the truth: it’s there, it’s written out, it has to do with morality. And what has that been replaced with? It has been replaced with the belief that truth is science. Now what has changed there? What has changed there is that actually something went missing. We lost something along the way. And what is it?

It’s morality.

You see what happened? Where is the morality inherent in science or in what we consider science?

There is none, as such. So in this passage from the belief in Christianity to the belief in science, we’ve done away with morality and I don’t think that was accidental. We are holding onto these beliefs of control.

Eugenics for example, was born with scientific so-called progress, this belief that there are biologically superior beings than others, and therefore we can dispense with those that are inferior. The same thing with races. I know a lot of people try and argue that’s not what he meant, but in the subtitle of The Origin of the Species by Darwin, he writes: The Preservation of Favoured Races. Yes, he means it in a biological sense, but it’s all there in a subliminal sense. It’s all already there. It’s all setting the world up for eugenics, which is basically a form of, of control over other humans. And that is what happens when you dispense with morality altogether.

I think we should consider turning it on its head from the start. I think we should think that evidence was maybe the wrong place to put our hopes in truth. We talked about the film that I produced called The Book of Vision, which is about modern medicine turning the human into an an object, or a set of objects, which are the organs, and it’s almost as if what we did with evidence is this: we’ve objectified truth. So truth doesn’t exists but in an object, and the object is the evidence. That’s what Descartes has done. In parallel, what we try and address in the film, The Book of Vision, is that that it is not where truth lives. It’s not in objects as such, and it’s actually in certain practices that as humans, we actually do.

Not necessarily truth arriving, but truth searching. In Christianity that was turned into some monastic practices of stripping away superfluous things: asceticism. You’d strip away the superfluous, you’d look within, and you’d find that moral core within you that you could really tune into, and then you would become a purified being. That was very much directed toward the self because the external truth had almost already been decided in certain books. Now, I’m not saying that that’s where we should go back to. I’m saying that should be as important as anything that we can see as science. The whole history of cultural, moral teachings as codified in in religious books is just as important as anything we call science. One has not supplanted the other, one is not better than the other, as we’ve been presented.

First of all, I would say put those on the same level, at least, if not actually, on a different one. Let’s practice these together so that we don’t go back into the same kind of to and fro, because in a way science came because the codified books became too restrictive, and then science becomes too restrictive. I’m not saying that we should just go back to the codified books, then we’re just going to end up with science again, which I don’t want. I’m saying let’s go even further back and let’s look at Ancient Greece and let’s look at what happened there in the dialogues, the Socratic dialogues, and in the practice of speaking to each other and speaking truth. Truth-telling, or free speech, which is a practice they had a word for: parresia. That was quite fundamental for democracy: that this was a practice that actually took place, this free speech.

The person who speaks freely, they know they speak the truth. It’s difficult for us to understand because we are so caught up in the Cartesian view that you need evidence, that we find it difficult to understand that at the time they had an idea of truth, and it was not linked to evidence.

They would probably laugh at you if you would bring an object and say:

“This in my evidence!”

Someone’s right if they say this in my evidence? They would laugh at you because they would say:

“No, you, you’ve got to fight this yourself!”

Following your own sense of what’s truthful, meaning moral truth, not relying on, secondhand notions.

We turned it on its head, but back then you knew that you were speaking the truth because you really felt it.

Because what you spoke coincided with a kind of moral self, set within yourself, and coming from a moral culture outside of you, much older than modern science.

Robin Monotti Graziadei

https://t.me/robinmg/26724

https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2023/05/19/how-belief-in-science-stripped-morality-from-truth/

The Club of Rome:
The Common Enemy of Humanity is Man

" In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill.
In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes.
All these dangers are caused by human intervention In natural processes. and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome.

The real enemy then is humanity itself..

The Club of Rome: "The First Global Revolution", 1991

It would seem that men and women need a common motivation, namely a common adversary, to organize and act together in the vacuum. Such a motivation seemed to have ceased to exist or have yet to be found. The need for enemies seems to be a common historical factor. Bring the divided nation together to face an outside enemy, either a real one or else one invented for the purpose.

Democracy will be made to seem responsible for the lagging economy, the scarcity and uncertainties. The very concept of democracy could then be brought into question and allow for the seizure of power."

It’s so perfect, isn’t it?

https://open.substack.com/pub/eugyppius/p/in-act-of-divine-retribution-equestrian

GPs are NOT above human rights. They can't tell anyone to wear a mask without violating their human rights: Universal Declaration of Bioethics & Human Rights 2005, Art. 6. They can only ask, and have to accept a negative answer without subjecting patients to disadvantage or prejudice.

https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1702757943790244077

Testified at EU Parliament and told MEP's that the WHO appears to be a part of the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex that is hell-bent in getting a needle into every arm with no regard to patient safety. Subscribe to #courageousdiscourse

Dr. McCullough’s Speech at the European Parliament

Dr. McCullough delivered a speech to the European Union Parliament on September 13, 2023, in a session dedicated to the World Health Organization and Pandemic response. There were four attorneys and five scientists who made presentations. Dr. McCulllough’s speech was organized around three main concepts:

1 – A Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex has formed after years of planning and congealing. This is a working syndicate that aspires for global domination over all plants, animals, and humans. Through the context of health emergencies, the Complex has gained powers of authoritarian control over the entire globe.

2 – We have witnessed two waves of human suffering: a) SARS-CoV-2 respiratory illness, and b) mass indiscriminate COVID-19 vaccination. Both have installed the engineered, disease-promoting and potentially lethal Spike protein from the novel Wuhan Institute of Virology coronavirus.

3 – The Complex has inflicted global terror through three false narratives:

> SARS-CoV-2 infection is unassailable. It cannot and will not be treated early. The only public health responses are to social distance, lock-down, and mask-up, and take genetic vaccines every six months with no end in sight.

> The COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective, with no questions allowed from academia, mainstream media, or among peers.

> The massive human toll of Spike protein injuries, disabilities, and death are from the coronavirus infection, not the accumulating synthetic mRNA coding for cellular production and circulation of the same long-lasting Spike protein.'

https://www.americaoutloud.news/dr-mcculloughs-speech-at-the-european-parliament/

WORLD WIDE RALLY FOR FREEDOM & I WILL NOT COMPLY!

LONDON, ENGLAND

1 PM SAT 23RD SEPTEMBER

HYDE PARK SPEAKERS CORNER

#IWillNotComply
#WeDoNotConsent

Hi-Rez & Jimmy Levy - United We Stand (Music Video)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=UvEw4GETUtE&feature=shared

NEW PODCAST! 🎙📡🤖

Joe Allen discusses the age of intelligent machines and all things transhumanism, which is a new heterodox religion steeped in Gnosticism that has crept into government and major corporations seeking to create Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) or god on earth and a transcendent realm to escape into. We discuss DARPA, brain-computer interfaces (BCI), the goal to meld the brain with computers systems, and how transgenderism is a slippery slope toward transhumanism. The danger with this movement is it’s goal of creating a totalizing technology which would lead to a dystopian society or an idiocracy run by algorithms!

🔗 https://geopoliticsandempire.com/2023/09/15/joe-allen-dark-aeon-transhumanism