Face masks CANNOT be mandatory. They ALWAYS require consent of the person, which can be negated or withdrawn WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE:

"UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF BIOETHICS & HUMAN RIGHTS, 2005 - Article 6:

1. Any 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲, 𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗴𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 & 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗲𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗰 medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free & informed 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧 of the person concerned based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason WITHOUT DISADVANTAGE OR PREJUDICE"

ROBINMG 🚀

Let's keep reminding ourselves that WE are the majority, NOT Keir Starmer's Labour Party.

ROBINMG 🚀

The idea that democracy means voting every few years and allowing corrupt politicians to rob us in between is a hoax people need to wake up from quick...

ROBINMG 🚀

One of these is the new Prime Minister of the UK, the other is Keir Starmer.

ROBINMG 🚀

"We will begin with a RESET with Europe" - New UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy's dog whistle to Klaus Schwab & the WEF Globalists.

ROBINMG 🚀

KEIR STARMER DESPISES BRITAIN: HE IS A GLOBALIST:

"You have to choose between Davos or Westminster?"

KEIR STARMER: "Davos"

ROBINMG 🚀

1990s: We want tolerance
2000: We want civil partnerships
2007: Catholic adoption agencies must close
2013: Redefine marriage or you’re a homophobe
2014: Bake the cake, bigot
2019: Wax my lady balls
2020: We're going to queer your kids
2025: Say my pronouns or go to jail

Dr. Michael Nehls is a physician and molecular biologist from Germany. Watch the full video here:
https://rumble.com/v4km7q3-indoctrinated-brain-by-dr.-michael-nehls.html
In the video, Dr Nehls discusses the importance of hippocampal neurogenesis and offers ways to improve it through lifestyle changes, including purpose in life, sleep, nutrition, physical activity, and social life.

To keep the hippocampus happy, we need:
Physical activity
Social life
Sunlight
Good food and sleep
Relaxing time with others.
watch here:
https://t.me/Doctorsforcovidethics/1090

To sell statins, we're told cholesterol damages arteries—in reality, it repairs arterial injury. Statins hence don't prevent death and give 20% of users muscle, liver, or nerve damage.

Dr Pierre Kory

The Great Cholesterol Scam and The Dangers of Statins
https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-cholesterol-scam-and-the

ROBINMG 🚀

What Keir Starmer means is:
"The first duty of my government" is to WAR! WAR! WAR! (The draft coming next)

ROBINMG 🚀

Just in time for the US Presidential election!

International Bird Flu Summit

Conference: Oct 2-3
Workshop: Oct 4

https://birdflusummit.com/

ROBINMG 🚀

"Israel has no right to exist"

Haim Bresheeth, a Jewish professor from the SOAS University of London explains why Israel shouldn’t exist.

#GazaGenocide #FreePalestine

@PressTV

The Socialist Fabian Society (Keir Starmer is a member) boasting here that they now have 141 MPs in the UK Labour Party. One of their aims is to bring about Socialism in the UK by using Capitalism to bring about its own decline.

The 1880s saw an upsurge in socialist activity in Britain and the Fabian Society was at the heart of much of it. The Fabian Essays were published, containing work by George Bernard Shaw, Graham Walls, Sidney Webb, Sydney Olivier and Annie Besant.

Their dirty open secret is that they were/are massive racists and the society is heavily into eugenics

Here is an old article from The Guardian of all places, on this topic

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/from-the-archive-blog/2019/may/01/eugenics-founding-fathers-british-socialism-archive-1997

"Eugenics is the dirty little secret of the British left. The names of the first champions read like a roll call of British socialism’s best and brightest: Sidney and Beatrice Webb, George Bernard Shaw, Harold Laski, John Maynard Keynes, Marie Stopes, the New Statesman even, ..the Manchester Guardian..

Thus George Bernard Shaw could write: “The only fundamental and possible socialism is the socialisation of the selective breeding of man”. Later he mused that “the overthrow of the aristocrat has created the necessity for the Superman”. The revered pacifist, disarmer and philosophical titan, Bertrand Russell, dreamed up a wheeze that would have made even Nazi Germany’s eugenicists blush. He suggested the state issue colour-coded “procreation tickets”. Those who dared breed with holders of a different-coloured ticket would face a heavy fine. That way the high-calibre gene pool of the elite would not be muddied by any proletarian or worse, foreign, muck. The New Statesman agreed, explaining in July 1931: “The legitimate claims of eugenics are not inherently incompatible with the outlook of the collectivist movement. On the contrary, they would be expected to find their most intransigent opponents amongst those who cling to the individualistic views of parenthood and family economics.” The bottom line is bleak but clear. Eugenics, the art and science of breeding better men, is not just the historical problem of Germany and now Scandinavia, nor even of the jackbooted right. It took root right here in Britain – pushed and argued by the left. Indeed, contempt for ordinary people and outright racism were two of the defining creeds of British socialism.

The trouble began with Charles Darwin. His breakthrough work, The Origin of Species, did not restrict its impact to the academy and laboratories. Instead it transformed the very way mankind understood itself in the 19th century, its message fast spilling over into the realm of political ideas. Suddenly the religious notion that all life was equally sacred was under attack. Human beings were like any other species – some were more evolved than others. The human race could be divided into different categories and classes. When Karl Marx took on the task of charting human development and defining the class structure, he acknowledged his debt – dedicating an early edition of Das Kapital to none other than Charles Darwin.

From the beginning, socialism regarded itself as the natural ally, even the political version, of science. Just as biologists sought to understand animals and plants, so scientific socialism would master people. According to Adrian Wooldridge, author of Measuring the Mind: Education and Psychology in England 1860-1990, and a recognised authority on early ideas of human merit, progressives believed the only enemies of Darwin were reactionaries, the religious and the superstitious. Science, by contrast, represented progress. Crucially, these early leftists regarded science as an utterly neutral tool; something could not be scientifically right and morally wrong. In this climate, says Wooldridge, “eugenics became the political correctness of its day”. If you were modern, you believed in it.

The result was a Darwinian commitment to improving the quality of the nation’s genetic stock. Many of the reforms admired by today’s leftists were not, in fact, borne of a benign desire to improve the lot of the poor, but rather to make Britons fitter – to guarantee their survival as one of the globe’s foremost races. Thus the Webbs pushed for free milk in schools not because their hearts bled for undernourished kids, but because they were alarmed by Britain’s performance in the Boer war, where troops had taken a good kicking at the hands of the black man: the Webbs believed a daily dose of calcium would improve the bones and teeth of the future working class."

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/from-the-archive-blog/2019/may/01/eugenics-founding-fathers-british-socialism-archive-1997

ROBINMG 🚀

"Many progressives were drawn to the hope that science could build up the strong parts of the nation, and slowly eliminate the weak. Dozens of them signed up for the Eugenics Society, which in the 1930s rivalled the Fabians as the fashionable salon of London socialism. Labour MP Ellen Wilkinson even wanted the society to form its own committee of Labour sympathisers. HG Wells could not contain his enthusiasm, hailing eugenics as the first step toward the removal “of detrimental types and characteristics” and the “fostering of desirable types” in their place.

For these early thinkers, eugenic socialism posed no contradiction: indeed, it made perfect sense. As Wooldridge points out, “the Webbs supported eugenic planning just as fervently as town planning”. If socialism was about organising and ordering society from the centre, then its most extreme advocates believed in extending that control – all the way into the wombs and testes of society’s weakest members. What they wanted was a neat, clean, planned Utopia: eugenics was just one part of that dream.

One other doctrine was crucial – profound elitism. It strikes the 1990s ear oddly, but these leading lights of British socialism had no patience for equality. The communist and one-time editor of the Daily Worker, JBS Haldane, considered equality a “curious dogma … we are not born equal, far from it”. Many on the left were members of the upper middle-class or lower aristocracy, convinced their higher intellectual capacities had to be preserved from proletarian infection. One popular idea of the time was to encourage artificial insemination – not to help the infertile, but to impregnate working-class women with the sperm of men with high IQs. Beatrice Webb was sure her genetic material was worth preserving, describing herself as “the cleverest member of one of the cleverest families in the cleverest class of the cleverest nation of the world”. She and her fellow travellers envisaged a world run by an elite made up of people like her, able to determine who could reproduce and who could not. Always fond of gazing into the future, HG Wells pictured a caste of all-powerful super-talented Ubermenschen, who would wear Samurai-style dress, and order the affairs of the planet.

In this context, there was only contempt for ordinary people, who were regarded as “sub-men” to be tended and looked after – via the welfare state – like a bovine herd. The Labour cabinet minister Douglas Jay felt no embarrassment in putting the attitude on record in his pamphlet, The Socialist Cause. Famously and loftily he declared, “In the case of nutrition and health, just as in the case of education, the gentleman in Whitehall really does know better what is good for people than the people know themselves”.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/from-the-archive-blog/2019/may/01/eugenics-founding-fathers-british-socialism-archive-1997

ROBINMG 🚀