Thuletide
Prime example of what I was describing in this post: Concept creep warping the definition of "pedophilia" and thus trivializing actual pedophilia (the sexual attraction to and/or abuse of prepubescents, the latter causing immense and long-lasting harm). I…
New absurd pedophile hysteria accusation: Having a large hard drive.
The people who call men "pedophiles" for being in a 0.5 second age gap relationship today were vehemently attempting to normalize actual pedophilia under guise of "LGBT rights" during the 2010s. Apparently everybody has developed woke selective amnesia on this issue.
False accusations are a multibillion dollar industry. Ye olde youthful whores metamorphosed into money-hungry hags who "suddenly realized" they were "abused" decades after they fucked Male Celebrity; some fabricate tales whole cloth. Do you believe Jared Leto wanted sex with this thing on the right?
Two decades after MeToo began and one decade after it was kicked into overdrive, women have successfully created an international extortion racket to rival the mafia.
Two decades after MeToo began and one decade after it was kicked into overdrive, women have successfully created an international extortion racket to rival the mafia.
I just got personally banned by a twitter admin.
My ban definitely wasn't a result of being mass reported, otherwise I would have received a "your post violated our rules!" notification (only happened once on this account), and it was unlikely to have been an automated/AI-driven ban, since I didn't even receive an email informing me that I'd been banned.
I guess they were looking for an excuse to ban me since I kept calling out their push to deanonymize the platform.
I was recently posting about pedo hysteria and libtards pushing actual pedophilia, so maybe they used that to claim I was some sort of child predator or whatever.
My ban definitely wasn't a result of being mass reported, otherwise I would have received a "your post violated our rules!" notification (only happened once on this account), and it was unlikely to have been an automated/AI-driven ban, since I didn't even receive an email informing me that I'd been banned.
I guess they were looking for an excuse to ban me since I kept calling out their push to deanonymize the platform.
I was recently posting about pedo hysteria and libtards pushing actual pedophilia, so maybe they used that to claim I was some sort of child predator or whatever.
Made a new X account: https://x.com/thuletide_
They flat out rejected my ban appeal on my recently suspended account.
Hopefully this new account won't get immediately banned.
(The @ is just the first two animals that came to mind, I wanted something inconspicuous. I'll change it in a month after the account matures).
They flat out rejected my ban appeal on my recently suspended account.
Hopefully this new account won't get immediately banned.
(The @ is just the first two animals that came to mind, I wanted something inconspicuous. I'll change it in a month after the account matures).
X (formerly Twitter)
moonlight pepe (@thuletide_) on X
1187 followers · 113 following. Joined Jul 2026. See the latest conversations with @thuletide_
"Policies that raise [women's] lifetime earnings lower fertility, while those that boost fertility reduce lifetime earnings."
"The increase in [female] non-employment raises fertility. With fewer job prospects, non-employed women have more incentives to have children."
The paper finds that among all studied fertility-boosting policies, only promotion subsidies improve both fertility and earnings, recommending this as a solution.
In reality, this means taking money from men (women don't pay taxes) to overpromote women at the cost of men competing within the same companies.
Source: Guner (2025), Family-Friendly Policies and Fertility
https://doi.org/10.53479/41858
#fertility
"The increase in [female] non-employment raises fertility. With fewer job prospects, non-employed women have more incentives to have children."
The paper finds that among all studied fertility-boosting policies, only promotion subsidies improve both fertility and earnings, recommending this as a solution.
In reality, this means taking money from men (women don't pay taxes) to overpromote women at the cost of men competing within the same companies.
Source: Guner (2025), Family-Friendly Policies and Fertility
https://doi.org/10.53479/41858
#fertility