Thuletide
22.8K subscribers
6.28K photos
586 videos
27 files
2.88K links
Nationalist, Classical Liberal, moderate centrist (circa 1900). You can plagiarize any of my writing & content. Follow: t.me/racerealismchannel
Download Telegram
Forwarded from Race Realism Channel
Admixture analysis for modern Europeans, arranged by percentage of Steppe ancestry (Yamnaya or early Corded Ware).

Here, Iran_N also encompasses Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer ancestry; the populations were relatively similar but not identical. CHG was omitted as Steppe populations carried 25-35% CHG ancestry and including both sources disrupts the model.

Iran_N/CHG and Natufian ancestry are mostly derived from Roman Imperial era Greeks and Anatolians. Note that modern Sicilians and Greek islanders display high genetic similarity. These populations have changed little since the Imperial era.

Iberomaurusian is North African Hunter-Gatherer ancestry, which has been present in Iberia since the Neolithic. It increased with Punic, Roman, and Muslim colonization, but exists at low frequencies today, < 5% on average.

Krasnoyarsk_BA represents Proto-Uralic East Siberian ancestry, which correlates with East European Hunter-Gatherer ancestry (Sidelkino), as these populations mixed when Proto-Uralics migrated westward.
Two questions come to mind:

1) Do women really enjoy being raped?

They prefer more violent sex than men and consume more violent porn than men. Many report having rape fantasies, but I suspect this is mostly a fantasy of being so sexually irresistible that a handsome man (or billionaire CEO vampire werewolf) is compelled to forcibly have sex with them. Rape orgasms are fairly common, but I suspect they're mostly an involuntary physiological response; men can get boners when driving down rough roads, but that doesn't mean we want to have sex with roads.

2) How many of these purported "rapes" were just drunken sex with chad after which the woman felt used and abandoned?

False accusations are a dime a dozen, and women retroactively withdraw consent all the time. I suspect that few women who were, for example, dragged away in a park by some hideous goblin, beaten black and blue, secretly enjoyed their defilement and/or felt any positive emotions toward their attackers.
Having bizarre sexual fetishes correlates with porn use, promiscuity, transgenderism, homosexuality, and mental illness (to the surprise of absolutely nobody).

All of these relationships are genetically confounded and causality is likely bidirectional for many. For example, a person who has a bizarre fetish may watch more porn because they cannot satisfy their fetish in real life, and watching porn may introduce them to even more bizarre fetishes.

Images in order:
- Porn use frequency
- Body count
- White vs. non-White
- Troons vs. non-troons
- Gays vs. straights
- Mental illness
- Political alignment
- Men vs. women

Data from Aella's Big Kink Survey, which actually has a pretty unbiased sample.
https://thefetishmap.com/map/
Late 19th Century Berlin
Forwarded from Thuletide
Popular Leftist myth:

Postwar decolonization was due to plucky brown Socialist rebels overthrowing their colonial overlords and sticking it to the evil White man. Western powers fought hard to defend their colonies because they were terrified by the combined might of Socialism and people of color.

Reality:

"Western powers" (now in the hands of globalists and libtards) supported non-White Socialist revolutionaries against their White governments in almost every anti-colonial revolutionary war, alongside the USSR and Communist China in many cases. Colonial governments didn't lose a single war but were forced to decolonize by combined economic warfare and political pressure from both Western and Communist powers. Some voluntarily decolonized to avoid war.
Thuletide
I don't think declining fertility is a huge problem in and of itself, since most Western countries were overpopulated even before the era of mass migration. Our fertility-related problems are: 1) Mass migration forcing Whites into a breeding contest with…
Reminder: Europeans overwhelmingly descend from the Medieval middle and upper classes, not the peasantry.

The former outbred the latter by a significant margin. As higher status positions were of limited availability, the excess children of more successful people faced downward social mobility. The lower classes, who had sub-replacement fertility levels, were constantly demographically replaced for hundreds of years.

This breeding pattern continued until the turn of the 19th century. From ~1800 to ~1880, there was little difference in net fertility by wealth/class, and after ~1880, higher wealth/class became negatively associated with fertility.

The vast majority of your ACTUAL ancestors were not peasants.

See: A Farewell to Alms by Gregory Clark