Sex crimes in Britain displayed with a linear scale.

Unfortunately, this doesn't include the confidence intervals from the original graph, but it's still a far more honest presentation of the data.

The more severe the sex crime, the more Third World migrants are overrepresented:

Crime statistics published by the Danish and British governments show that racial groups commit 'sexual offenses' (a broad category encompassing many crimes of varying severity) at similar rates in both countries.

The British government does not publish rape statistics separately from general 'sexual offenses', which is almost certainly an attempt to downplay the extent of non-White criminality.

For this information, we must turn to our friends in the Danish government, who produce the highest quality and most transparent data in Europe. Sub-Saharan overrepresentation jumps from 2.8x for 'sexual offenses' to 9.6x for rape, MENA from 2.1x to 5.4x, and South Asia from 1.3x to 2.7x.

Afghans in Britain are already overrepresented by 7.0x for sexual offenses, so their rape rate may be as high as 20-30x.

Graph source

To clarify: the type of axis scaling (logarithmic) that was dishonestly used on this graph is intended for data that has a colossal range in values, e.g. exponential growth. A magnitude 10 earthquake releases 1 trillion times more energy than a magnitude 2 earthquake. Obviously, you can't plot that on a linear scale.

Somebody would only use logarithmic scaling for data with a low range of values if they wanted to warp the results and bamboozle people who didn't know any better. In this case, it was used to minimize the criminal overrepresentation of third world migrants.

Does geriatric pregnancy producer higher IQ children?

No, obviously not. This association is genetically confounded. More intelligent mothers currently delay pregnancy for cultural reasons.

As per this study's results, advanced maternal age may be more harmful to children's intelligence than advanced paternal age, which is commonly associated with decreased offspring IQ.

This is likely because older mothers are less healthy; they have degraded uteruses and diminished placental function, resulting in insufficient blood flow and poor oxygen/nutrient delivery. They also have higher rates of inflammation and metabolic stress, and significantly higher rates of preterm deliveries and low birth weights.

Numerous studies cover these topics, but here are a couple of examples:

T2* Mapping of Placental Oxygenation to Estimate Fetal Cortical and Subcortical Maturation

Prenatal maternal inflammation and cognitive performance in offspring during late midlife

#fertility

The Paternal Age Effect refers to the statistical association between older fathers and certain offspring health outcomes, e.g. genetic disorders.

The degree to which these associations are causal varies significantly between traits, and there is much debate on correlation vs. causation in academic literature on this topic.

For example, paternal age correlates with decreased offspring IQ, but this study found that the association almost disappears when controlling for genetic confounding (-2.6/+1.6 IQ points per decade rise in paternal age, averaging to -0.6).

For monogenic disorders associated with the PAE (which result from a single gene variant), an important causal mechanism is the accumulation of de novo mutations in sperm, approximately 1-2 per year of paternal age.

The majority of de novo mutations have little to no detectable impact on an individual's phenotype, but some can be harmful, others beneficial. Single nucleotide variants (dnSNVs), which affect a single DNA building block, are the most common form.

The most prevalent traits that are associated with the PAE, such as autism and schizophrenia, are highly polygenic (resulting from numerous gene variants). The contribution of a typical age-related dnSNV to such traits ranges from nonexistent to negligible, but some high-impact variants can contribute substantially.

(See, e.g. the papers listed in my most recent Tweet: https://x.com/thuletide_/status/2115218317636153554).

Classic (monogenic) PAE disorders are individually very rare, and the combined absolute risk of all known disorders in this category may be lower than the absolute risk of Down Syndrome alone (although, I haven't run this calculation).

Through advancements in technology and medicine, modern societies have significantly reduced (or even eliminated) the selection pressures that previously "purged" deleterious variants from the gene pool. As such, they now accumulate over time, contributing to mutational load: the population-scale reduction in fitness caused by the buildup of harmful mutations.

Mutational load stemming from relaxed selection pressures plausibly contributed to the rise of leftism over time, given that True Believer leftists are disproportionately genetic abominations.

In conclusion: while the PAE is unlikely to cause you any problems on an individual level due to the minuscule absolute risk factors, all high-IQ right-wing people should marry at age 18 and reproduce young to ensure the health of future generations. (Note: Teen marriage does not causally increase risk of divorce).

This post was shadowbanned for some reason. If you are on Twitter, please check if you can see it.
https://x.com/thuletide_/status/2115203559851774310

The top 5 predictors of relationship satisfaction are:

1. Perceived partner commitment
2. Being appreciated
3. Sexual satisfaction
4. Perceived partner satisfaction
5. Conflict (or a lack thereof).

Source: Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies (2020)
https://www.pnas.org/doi/epdf/10.1073/pnas.1917036117

I was mass reported by feminists on Twitter so unfortunately I'm shadowbanned now.

I'll be crossposting my Tweets here for a while.

https://x.com/thuletide_/status/2115608478849130699

I think, aesthetically, tattoos are passable for men who are capable of lethal violence, but they're completely unacceptable for all women, even gross fat hogs (they already look bad enough).

By "passable" I mean that they don't look completely wretched or incongruous, as they do on women.

However, tattoos are very bad for your health, so you shouldn't get them even if you're a stone-cold killer (as if any man of that disposition would take my advice).

"Nothing of this scale has been seen in the United States, experts say, since the federal government’s counterinsurgency against the New Left and the anti-war movement in the 1960s and 1970s."