Google just gave AI coding agents a direct line into Android development.
Until now, AI agents like Claude Code had no clean way to build, test, or debug Android apps without a GUI in the loop.
Means you can now hand Claude Code a feature request and let it iterate on a real Android app autonomously.
Try it on a small feature and see how far it gets )
Until now, AI agents like Claude Code had no clean way to build, test, or debug Android apps without a GUI in the loop.
Android CLI lets agents interact with the full Android toolchain from the command line — build, install, run, inspect — without touching Android Studio. The agent gets structured output it can actually parse and act on.
Means you can now hand Claude Code a feature request and let it iterate on a real Android app autonomously.
Try it on a small feature and see how far it gets )
Which AI model to use for which task in 2026
One paid account plus a few free ones cover almost everything. No need to pay for four subscriptions at once.
• GPT-5.5 — the generalist and entry point. Brainstorming, quick edits, voice, screenshots. Not for deep code.
• Claude Opus 4.8 — best at code (88.6% on SWE-bench), long text, legal work. Won't flatter you, tells it straight.
• Gemini 3.1 Pro — 1M token context, $2 per million input. Big documents, video, research analysis, the whole Google stack.
• Grok — the only one with live access to X. Trends and sentiment right now. Neutral tone is not its thing.
• DeepSeek V4 — open-source, from $0.14 per million tokens, up to 35x cheaper than the flagships. Runs locally, zero data leaks. Built for bulk code work.
• Media — GPT Image 2 for text in images, Veo 3.1 for cinematic clips with sound, Kling 3.0 for native 4K. No single winner here.
The money move: one paid sub (Claude or Gemini, ~$20) plus free Grok and DeepSeek. Buy the rest only when you actually need it.
Forward this to someone still paying for every subscription at once )
One paid account plus a few free ones cover almost everything. No need to pay for four subscriptions at once.
• GPT-5.5 — the generalist and entry point. Brainstorming, quick edits, voice, screenshots. Not for deep code.
• Claude Opus 4.8 — best at code (88.6% on SWE-bench), long text, legal work. Won't flatter you, tells it straight.
• Gemini 3.1 Pro — 1M token context, $2 per million input. Big documents, video, research analysis, the whole Google stack.
• Grok — the only one with live access to X. Trends and sentiment right now. Neutral tone is not its thing.
• DeepSeek V4 — open-source, from $0.14 per million tokens, up to 35x cheaper than the flagships. Runs locally, zero data leaks. Built for bulk code work.
• Media — GPT Image 2 for text in images, Veo 3.1 for cinematic clips with sound, Kling 3.0 for native 4K. No single winner here.
The money move: one paid sub (Claude or Gemini, ~$20) plus free Grok and DeepSeek. Buy the rest only when you actually need it.
Forward this to someone still paying for every subscription at once )
A role at the start of your prompt flips GPT into the mode you need, from finding the weak spot to weighing risk.
Analyst
Act as an analyst: find where the system or habit broke first, and don't get lost in symptoms.
Planner
Act as a planner: turn this idea into a 10-minute next step.
Critic
Act as a critic: judge this idea on realism and its odds of getting done, not its wow factor.
Editor
Act as an editor: strip the extra layers, steps, and tools out of this process.
Strategist
Act as a strategist: show the consequences that hit later, not right away.
Reviewer
Act as a reviewer: spot where this plan drifts from my real goals, resources, and habits.
Most useful when you need a fast read with no extra theory.
You know exactly who needs this. Save it and pass it on.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💡 Make any AI stop bluffing: one paste-in rule
Most "AI hallucinations" aren't the model being dumb. It's told to always answer, so it fills gaps with confident nonsense. Flip that.
Paste this above your question (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini):
Why each line earns its place:
• "not sure" gives the model permission to stop. Without it, it bluffs.
• facts vs opinion makes the unverified parts visible at a glance.
• "what would change this" surfaces the assumptions worth checking.
Same model, better output, zero cost. And you see exactly where to verify.
Save it once, reuse forever )
Most "AI hallucinations" aren't the model being dumb. It's told to always answer, so it fills gaps with confident nonsense. Flip that.
Paste this above your question (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini):
Answer with this rule:
• If unsure, say "not sure" instead of guessing.
• Keep facts and opinion on separate lines.
• End with: "what would change this answer?"
Be short. No preamble.
Why each line earns its place:
• "not sure" gives the model permission to stop. Without it, it bluffs.
• facts vs opinion makes the unverified parts visible at a glance.
• "what would change this" surfaces the assumptions worth checking.
Same model, better output, zero cost. And you see exactly where to verify.
Save it once, reuse forever )
One subscription instead of four: how to stop paying for AI three times over
Most people end up with the same stack by accident. ChatGPT for conversations and images, Perplexity for deep research, then Claude or Gemini when one of them falls short. Each runs $8 to $20 a month. Together they quietly hit $50 to $60 before you notice.
• ChatGPT Plus — $20/mo for GPT-4o with image generation and agents. Solid, but one tool.
• Perplexity Pro — $20/mo for sourced, deep-search answers. Useful, but narrow.
• Claude Pro / Gemini Advanced — another $20 each when the others miss. The bill compounds fast.
What we built instead is a single subscription at 19 EUR/month that covers the real use cases in one place:
The logic is simple: specialized tools matter, but paying for a separate subscription per tool does not.
If any of your friends are still paying for three subscriptions, send this to them )
Most people end up with the same stack by accident. ChatGPT for conversations and images, Perplexity for deep research, then Claude or Gemini when one of them falls short. Each runs $8 to $20 a month. Together they quietly hit $50 to $60 before you notice.
"You are not paying for AI. You are paying for four separate front doors to roughly the same capability."
• ChatGPT Plus — $20/mo for GPT-4o with image generation and agents. Solid, but one tool.
• Perplexity Pro — $20/mo for sourced, deep-search answers. Useful, but narrow.
• Claude Pro / Gemini Advanced — another $20 each when the others miss. The bill compounds fast.
What we built instead is a single subscription at 19 EUR/month that covers the real use cases in one place:
✦ Access to the strongest AI models (GPT-4o, Claude, Gemini and more)
✦ Smart search with sourced answers
✦ Image generation
✦ 10+ focused tools built for specific jobs:
— video, text and document summarisation
— marketplace review analysis
— purchase planning
— price drop tracking
— and moreThe logic is simple: specialized tools matter, but paying for a separate subscription per tool does not.
If any of your friends are still paying for three subscriptions, send this to them )
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤2
🚀 AI is still one of the few tools that levels the playing field
Access to expert-level thinking used to require money, connections, or years of school. Right now, most of that is available to anyone with a phone and a free account.
- Writing and editing — a first-generation college student can produce polished work on par with someone who had a private tutor. No premium subscription needed for the basics.
- Code — someone without a CS degree can ship a working product. The barrier used to be years of training; now it's a well-formed question.
- Research and analysis — a small business owner in a mid-size city gets the same quality of market breakdown a consultant would charge thousands for.
- ⚠️ The window — historically, early-stage tools give the most leverage to the people who have the least. As platforms mature, pricing and gatekeeping tend to follow.
The social lift is real, but it's not permanent by default. The people who move now get the most out of it.
If someone in your circle is sleeping on this, forward it to them )
Access to expert-level thinking used to require money, connections, or years of school. Right now, most of that is available to anyone with a phone and a free account.
- Writing and editing — a first-generation college student can produce polished work on par with someone who had a private tutor. No premium subscription needed for the basics.
- Code — someone without a CS degree can ship a working product. The barrier used to be years of training; now it's a well-formed question.
- Research and analysis — a small business owner in a mid-size city gets the same quality of market breakdown a consultant would charge thousands for.
- ⚠️ The window — historically, early-stage tools give the most leverage to the people who have the least. As platforms mature, pricing and gatekeeping tend to follow.
The social lift is real, but it's not permanent by default. The people who move now get the most out of it.
If someone in your circle is sleeping on this, forward it to them )
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤2
⭐ Telegram's Official Affiliate Program Pays Channel Owners 50% for 6 Months
Telegram launched a native affiliate system that lets channel and group owners earn a cut when their audience buys access to bots - no third-party tools, no workarounds.
Revenue share — 50% of every Stars payment from a user who came through your referral link goes directly to you.
Duration — earnings run for 6 months per referred user, not just the first purchase. Passive income as long as they keep paying.
Payment method — payouts are in Telegram Stars, the platform's native currency, so everything stays inside the ecosystem.
What you're promoting — bots people actually find useful, which keeps conversion pressure low and retention real.
The math is straightforward: the bigger your engaged audience, the more your link earns after you post it once.
If you run a Telegram channel or group and haven't looked at this yet, it's worth a few minutes )
Telegram launched a native affiliate system that lets channel and group owners earn a cut when their audience buys access to bots - no third-party tools, no workarounds.
Revenue share — 50% of every Stars payment from a user who came through your referral link goes directly to you.
Duration — earnings run for 6 months per referred user, not just the first purchase. Passive income as long as they keep paying.
Telegram’s affiliate platform lets channels earn Stars from eligible bot and mini-app purchases. The developer sets both the commission rate and the commission period, so terms vary by program.
Payment method — payouts are in Telegram Stars, the platform's native currency, so everything stays inside the ecosystem.
What you're promoting — bots people actually find useful, which keeps conversion pressure low and retention real.
The math is straightforward: the bigger your engaged audience, the more your link earns after you post it once.
If you run a Telegram channel or group and haven't looked at this yet, it's worth a few minutes )
✍1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍2
New here from Threads? Start with this.
Most AI drafts don’t need another prompt.
They need a human editing pass.
Try this four-step cleanup:
1. Delete the warm-up.
The first sentence is often empty context.
2. Replace abstractions with specifics.
Don’t write “improve productivity.” Name what becomes faster or easier.
3. Break perfect symmetry.
Three polished points of equal length usually sound generated.
4. Read it aloud.
Rewrite every sentence you would never say in conversation.
Before:
After:
Here I break down AI writing, test tools, and share what I learn while building my own products.
Save this checklist for your next AI draft.
Most AI drafts don’t need another prompt.
They need a human editing pass.
Try this four-step cleanup:
1. Delete the warm-up.
The first sentence is often empty context.
2. Replace abstractions with specifics.
Don’t write “improve productivity.” Name what becomes faster or easier.
3. Break perfect symmetry.
Three polished points of equal length usually sound generated.
4. Read it aloud.
Rewrite every sentence you would never say in conversation.
Before:
In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, effective communication is more important than ever.
After:
AI can write the sentence. It still doesn’t know what you actually wanted to say.
Here I break down AI writing, test tools, and share what I learn while building my own products.
Save this checklist for your next AI draft.
All new models are available in our AI chat starting September 14
We’re finishing up testing today, and starting Monday, we’ll open access to the seventeen models released over the past month.
Full list:
Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1, Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber, Muse Spark 1.3, Qwen3.8-Max-0902, GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6 Astra Pro, Ling-3.0-flash-VL and Ling-3.0-flash-Sante, Lyria 3.5, ChatGPT Images 2.5, GPT-Image-2.5 Flare and GPT-Image-2.5 Sunburst, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, Fugu Max and Fugu Ultra v2.
🗂
Pay for a SINGLE SUBSCRIPTION starting at $8 per month; most models can be tried for free.
Share this with anyone who’s been waiting for GPT-Image-2 or DeepSeek-V4 all in one place )
We’re finishing up testing today, and starting Monday, we’ll open access to the seventeen models released over the past month.
Full list:
Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1, Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber, Muse Spark 1.3, Qwen3.8-Max-0902, GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6 Astra Pro, Ling-3.0-flash-VL and Ling-3.0-flash-Sante, Lyria 3.5, ChatGPT Images 2.5, GPT-Image-2.5 Flare and GPT-Image-2.5 Sunburst, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, Fugu Max and Fugu Ultra v2.
🗂
Pay for a SINGLE SUBSCRIPTION starting at $8 per month; most models can be tried for free.
Share this with anyone who’s been waiting for GPT-Image-2 or DeepSeek-V4 all in one place )
👍1