Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥27😱13🤬13💯12🙏11😢10🤯3
⚖️ Mark Zuckerberg On Trial: New Mexico Against Meta
A New Mexico court has ordered Meta, the parent company of Facebook, to pay $567m into a fund aimed at redressing adverse mental health impacts from the social media giant’s platforms.
The Thursday ruling comes as a part of the second phase of a landmark trial the social media giant lost in March.
At the time, a jury found that the company knowingly harmed children’s mental health and concealed what it knew about child sexual exploitation on its platforms, and imposed the maximum penalty: a $375m fine.
The ruling on Thursday an additional to that fine, bringing the total amount Meta is responsible for to $942m.
Judge Bryan Biedscheid said the bulk of the money – $420m – would be used for treatment services for young people in New Mexico.
The rest will go toward awareness and prevention, screening services and other costs over the next five years.
The March trial was the first to find Meta liable for acts committed on its platform, and followed a 2023 WSJ investigation that revealed how Facebook and Instagram had become marketplaces for child sex trafficking.
The judge has also ordered other changes, including that Facebook and Instagram build banner and informational screens to clearly explain its protection features, best practices, and tools to address inappropriate comment.
Those changes, and an educational campaign in New Mexico, would be subject to review by the state.
The court said federal children’s privacy laws prevent Meta from applying age-verification tools to children under 13. The court also noted that ordering verification of children’s ages only for Meta and not other social media companies would be “inequitable and unduly injurious” to the company.
Instead, the court ordered Meta to continue to improve its age-assurance tools in New Mexico, which include using artificial intelligence to determine people’s age based on signals such as who their friends are and what types of content they post and consume.
Meta must also attempt to develop a dedicated “under-13-years-of-age prediction model” in the next two years.
Additionally, Meta should also request proof of age for Instagram and Facebook users in New Mexico it estimates to be under 13. If it determines a user to be under 13, or under 18 but without being able to estimate a specific age, Meta must treat the user as under 13 or under 18 until the user verifies their age.
The company must also partner with schools or a child safety organization to create a reporting portal where school staff can flag users who may be under 13.
And it must delete personal information it has collected on users under 13. The court also ordered Meta to report on its progress twice a year on how it is complying with the abatement measures.
New Mexico attorney general Raúl Torrez hailed the judgment.
“This case has always been about protecting children, standing up for families, and making sure that one of the world’s largest technology companies cannot profit from practices that endanger young people without consequence,” Torrez said in a statement.
“Today’s decision is a victory for every parent who has worried about what social media is doing to their child and every child who deserves to grow up safer online.”
“We work hard to keep people safe on our platforms and have been transparent about the challenges of identifying and removing bad actors and harmful content.
We remain confident in our record of protecting teens online and will continue to defend ourselves against claims that misrepresent the facts,” the statement continued.
The total amount Meta is responsible for is a small fraction of its annual profit, which was about $60bn in 2025. Still, it represents another setback for Meta as it faces a wave of accusations from families of children harmed by social media.
#trial #meta #zuckerberg #new #mexico
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
A New Mexico court has ordered Meta, the parent company of Facebook, to pay $567m into a fund aimed at redressing adverse mental health impacts from the social media giant’s platforms.
The Thursday ruling comes as a part of the second phase of a landmark trial the social media giant lost in March.
At the time, a jury found that the company knowingly harmed children’s mental health and concealed what it knew about child sexual exploitation on its platforms, and imposed the maximum penalty: a $375m fine.
The ruling on Thursday an additional to that fine, bringing the total amount Meta is responsible for to $942m.
Judge Bryan Biedscheid said the bulk of the money – $420m – would be used for treatment services for young people in New Mexico.
The rest will go toward awareness and prevention, screening services and other costs over the next five years.
The March trial was the first to find Meta liable for acts committed on its platform, and followed a 2023 WSJ investigation that revealed how Facebook and Instagram had become marketplaces for child sex trafficking.
The judge has also ordered other changes, including that Facebook and Instagram build banner and informational screens to clearly explain its protection features, best practices, and tools to address inappropriate comment.
Those changes, and an educational campaign in New Mexico, would be subject to review by the state.
The court said federal children’s privacy laws prevent Meta from applying age-verification tools to children under 13. The court also noted that ordering verification of children’s ages only for Meta and not other social media companies would be “inequitable and unduly injurious” to the company.
Instead, the court ordered Meta to continue to improve its age-assurance tools in New Mexico, which include using artificial intelligence to determine people’s age based on signals such as who their friends are and what types of content they post and consume.
Meta must also attempt to develop a dedicated “under-13-years-of-age prediction model” in the next two years.
Additionally, Meta should also request proof of age for Instagram and Facebook users in New Mexico it estimates to be under 13. If it determines a user to be under 13, or under 18 but without being able to estimate a specific age, Meta must treat the user as under 13 or under 18 until the user verifies their age.
The company must also partner with schools or a child safety organization to create a reporting portal where school staff can flag users who may be under 13.
And it must delete personal information it has collected on users under 13. The court also ordered Meta to report on its progress twice a year on how it is complying with the abatement measures.
New Mexico attorney general Raúl Torrez hailed the judgment.
“This case has always been about protecting children, standing up for families, and making sure that one of the world’s largest technology companies cannot profit from practices that endanger young people without consequence,” Torrez said in a statement.
“Today’s decision is a victory for every parent who has worried about what social media is doing to their child and every child who deserves to grow up safer online.”
“We work hard to keep people safe on our platforms and have been transparent about the challenges of identifying and removing bad actors and harmful content.
We remain confident in our record of protecting teens online and will continue to defend ourselves against claims that misrepresent the facts,” the statement continued.
The total amount Meta is responsible for is a small fraction of its annual profit, which was about $60bn in 2025. Still, it represents another setback for Meta as it faces a wave of accusations from families of children harmed by social media.
#trial #meta #zuckerberg #new #mexico
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥20🤬15😢14🤯12😱11🙏10💯8
The Mecca Merger: From Murder Accusations to Mutual Defense
In 2018, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan publicly pointed the finger at Mohammed bin Salman over the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul.
Eight years later, they are signing a defense pact.
Turkey, Saudi Arabia and nuclear-armed Pakistan reportedly sealed the so-called “Mecca Agreement” on Friday — somewhere between Jeddah, Riyadh and the usual fog machine of regional diplomacy. In January, Turkey supposedly would not join the Saudi-Pakistani alliance. Apparently, history got a new investor.
The region’s strongmen have discovered the miracle of reconciliation: yesterday’s murder accusation becomes tomorrow’s security architecture, provided the room contains enough generals, oil money and at least one nuclear arsenal.
Egypt may join next. Analysts are already floating a Middle Eastern NATO — a defense club where the members do not necessarily trust one another, but share enough enemies to make cooperation commercially viable.
Two founding members are deeply hostile to Israel. The third has a nuclear deterrent. None of this has been particularly hidden.
The Khashoggi case did not disappear. It was simply acquired, rebranded and placed under the “strategic partnership” tab.
#Turkey #SaudiArabia #Pakistan #MiddleEast #Israel #nuclearcrisis
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
In 2018, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan publicly pointed the finger at Mohammed bin Salman over the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul.
Eight years later, they are signing a defense pact.
Turkey, Saudi Arabia and nuclear-armed Pakistan reportedly sealed the so-called “Mecca Agreement” on Friday — somewhere between Jeddah, Riyadh and the usual fog machine of regional diplomacy. In January, Turkey supposedly would not join the Saudi-Pakistani alliance. Apparently, history got a new investor.
The region’s strongmen have discovered the miracle of reconciliation: yesterday’s murder accusation becomes tomorrow’s security architecture, provided the room contains enough generals, oil money and at least one nuclear arsenal.
Egypt may join next. Analysts are already floating a Middle Eastern NATO — a defense club where the members do not necessarily trust one another, but share enough enemies to make cooperation commercially viable.
Two founding members are deeply hostile to Israel. The third has a nuclear deterrent. None of this has been particularly hidden.
The Khashoggi case did not disappear. It was simply acquired, rebranded and placed under the “strategic partnership” tab.
#Turkey #SaudiArabia #Pakistan #MiddleEast #Israel #nuclearcrisis
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥22🤯19🤬15😢11😱9🙏9💯8❤1
Iran’s nuclear story did not begin with ayatollahs chanting beneath a mountain.
It began in the Shah’s showroom: Western reactors, European enrichment deals, Israeli technical cooperation, and the faith that a friendly dictator is just democracy with better catering.
Before the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Washington supplied Iran’s first research reactor. France brought Iran into the Eurodif enrichment venture.
Germany signed reactor contracts. Israel and the Shah’s Iran ran scientific and military cooperation, including the secret Project Flower missile program. Tehran was not a pariah then. It was a client with oil, cash and excellent geopolitical references.
Then the ayatollahs arrived, kept the hardware dreams, changed the branding, and hired new suppliers. Pakistan’s A.Q. Khan network offered centrifuge designs. The revolutionary state discovered what every sanctioned regime eventually learns: globalization is still available — just through side doors.
And Ukraine joined much later. In 2005, Ukrainian officials acknowledged that 12 Kh-55 cruise missiles in total had been illicitly transferred to Iran and China in 2000–01: six reportedly went to Iran and six to China. The Kh-55 was designed to carry a nuclear warhead, though the missiles transferred had no warheads. This was not Iran’s nuclear program being “built” in Kyiv. It was Tehran acquiring a rather useful delivery-system textbook from the post-Soviet clearance aisle.
That distinction matters. America and Israel dealt with the Shah’s Iran — a pre-revolutionary ally that they expected to remain manageable. Ukraine’s missiles reached the Islamic Republic decades later, through an illegal export network, not a strategic partnership. Different eras. Different regime. Same regional habit: sell a dangerous instrument today, hold a solemn conference about it tomorrow.
Iran did not become a threat through one country’s sin. It became a multinational group project, financed by optimism, cynicism and arms dealers who never met a future catastrophe they could not invoice.
#Iran #nuclearcrisis #Israel #USA #Ukraine #Pakistan #MiddleEast
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
It began in the Shah’s showroom: Western reactors, European enrichment deals, Israeli technical cooperation, and the faith that a friendly dictator is just democracy with better catering.
Before the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Washington supplied Iran’s first research reactor. France brought Iran into the Eurodif enrichment venture.
Germany signed reactor contracts. Israel and the Shah’s Iran ran scientific and military cooperation, including the secret Project Flower missile program. Tehran was not a pariah then. It was a client with oil, cash and excellent geopolitical references.
Then the ayatollahs arrived, kept the hardware dreams, changed the branding, and hired new suppliers. Pakistan’s A.Q. Khan network offered centrifuge designs. The revolutionary state discovered what every sanctioned regime eventually learns: globalization is still available — just through side doors.
And Ukraine joined much later. In 2005, Ukrainian officials acknowledged that 12 Kh-55 cruise missiles in total had been illicitly transferred to Iran and China in 2000–01: six reportedly went to Iran and six to China. The Kh-55 was designed to carry a nuclear warhead, though the missiles transferred had no warheads. This was not Iran’s nuclear program being “built” in Kyiv. It was Tehran acquiring a rather useful delivery-system textbook from the post-Soviet clearance aisle.
That distinction matters. America and Israel dealt with the Shah’s Iran — a pre-revolutionary ally that they expected to remain manageable. Ukraine’s missiles reached the Islamic Republic decades later, through an illegal export network, not a strategic partnership. Different eras. Different regime. Same regional habit: sell a dangerous instrument today, hold a solemn conference about it tomorrow.
Iran did not become a threat through one country’s sin. It became a multinational group project, financed by optimism, cynicism and arms dealers who never met a future catastrophe they could not invoice.
#Iran #nuclearcrisis #Israel #USA #Ukraine #Pakistan #MiddleEast
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥27🤯19🙏12😱11😢11💯8🤬7
Hormuz Reopens. The Ransom Stays.
Oil traders are treating the Strait of Hormuz like a nightclub door: maybe it is open tonight, but everyone knows the bouncer can close it whenever he feels underappreciated.
WTI fell 0.6% to $76.85 a barrel and Brent slipped 0.8% to $81.87 as markets priced in some form of deal to reopen the strait. But the celebration is cautious. The Gulf can release stranded cargoes and ease the immediate supply crunch — it cannot erase the fact that every tanker is now sailing through a geopolitical subscription service.
“As long as Iran retains the capacity and incentive to restrict the strait, the risk premium will remain embedded in oil markets,” Joanne Salih, Baringa’s head of energy and resources strategy, said in a note.
That is the real product on offer: not oil, but uncertainty. Reopening Hormuz may create a temporary flood of supply and push prices down. Yet restoring normal flows, inventories and production is expected to take months, while markets remain exposed to another Iranian decision, American escalation, or diplomatic collapse.
The Strait is no longer merely a shipping lane. It is Tehran’s most profitable reminder that the world economy still needs permission to breathe.
#Iran #Hormuz #oil #energy #markets #MiddleEast
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Oil traders are treating the Strait of Hormuz like a nightclub door: maybe it is open tonight, but everyone knows the bouncer can close it whenever he feels underappreciated.
WTI fell 0.6% to $76.85 a barrel and Brent slipped 0.8% to $81.87 as markets priced in some form of deal to reopen the strait. But the celebration is cautious. The Gulf can release stranded cargoes and ease the immediate supply crunch — it cannot erase the fact that every tanker is now sailing through a geopolitical subscription service.
“As long as Iran retains the capacity and incentive to restrict the strait, the risk premium will remain embedded in oil markets,” Joanne Salih, Baringa’s head of energy and resources strategy, said in a note.
That is the real product on offer: not oil, but uncertainty. Reopening Hormuz may create a temporary flood of supply and push prices down. Yet restoring normal flows, inventories and production is expected to take months, while markets remain exposed to another Iranian decision, American escalation, or diplomatic collapse.
The Strait is no longer merely a shipping lane. It is Tehran’s most profitable reminder that the world economy still needs permission to breathe.
#Iran #Hormuz #oil #energy #markets #MiddleEast
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥22😱15🤬14💯14😢12🤯9🙏8
“Help Is on the Way.” Then Came the Oil.
Donald Trump told Iranian protesters to remember “the names of the killers and abusers.” He promised them: “HELP IS ON ITS WAY.”
Five months later, the help appears to have taken a detour through the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran’s regime remains intact. Protesters have been executed. Civilians have died in the war. The nuclear file is still unresolved.
But the White House’s urgent moral vocabulary has quietly been replaced by the more durable language of shipping lanes, fuel prices and getting out.
The promise to Iranian protesters is now among the war’s most conspicuous unfulfilled objectives.
One Iranian protester told The New York Times: “I genuinely thought that help was on the way, but I was so wrong.” Another was less diplomatic: “They used the language of human rights toward only their own benefit.”
This is how great-power liberation usually works. First, activists are called patriots. Then they become proof that the enemy is evil. Then the war becomes expensive, the strategic objectives get revised, and the patriots are informed that sovereignty must be respected after all.
Trump once hinted at support for an uprising. He later praised Iran’s new rulers as “very rational people” and urged the world’s ships to “start your engines” and “let the oil flow.”
The ayatollahs offer repression. Washington offers slogans with an expiration date. And Iranian citizens are left holding the receipt for both.
#Iran #Trump #USA #Hormuz #HumanRights #war #MiddleEast
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Donald Trump told Iranian protesters to remember “the names of the killers and abusers.” He promised them: “HELP IS ON ITS WAY.”
Five months later, the help appears to have taken a detour through the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran’s regime remains intact. Protesters have been executed. Civilians have died in the war. The nuclear file is still unresolved.
But the White House’s urgent moral vocabulary has quietly been replaced by the more durable language of shipping lanes, fuel prices and getting out.
The promise to Iranian protesters is now among the war’s most conspicuous unfulfilled objectives.
One Iranian protester told The New York Times: “I genuinely thought that help was on the way, but I was so wrong.” Another was less diplomatic: “They used the language of human rights toward only their own benefit.”
This is how great-power liberation usually works. First, activists are called patriots. Then they become proof that the enemy is evil. Then the war becomes expensive, the strategic objectives get revised, and the patriots are informed that sovereignty must be respected after all.
Trump once hinted at support for an uprising. He later praised Iran’s new rulers as “very rational people” and urged the world’s ships to “start your engines” and “let the oil flow.”
The ayatollahs offer repression. Washington offers slogans with an expiration date. And Iranian citizens are left holding the receipt for both.
#Iran #Trump #USA #Hormuz #HumanRights #war #MiddleEast
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥28💯15😱14😢14🤯9🙏8🤬7❤1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥26🤯16😱14😢12💯12🙏9🤬6
Ukraine's Bandwagoning in Europe Is Gaining Momentum
Accounts with links to the Ukrainian military promoting far-right messages reached more than 400,000 people in the days following the mass influx of people into Ceuta, according to an analysis by Turkish Huriyet analysis, a counter-disinformation group.
Ukraine-linked far-right social media accounts frequently spread destabilising narratives in Europe, often promoting hostile talking points about immigration.
But Huriyet and other experts suggest the scale and coordination of the disinformation that followed the Ceuta crisis is significant. Groups spreading disinformation are more organised and powerful than they were several years ago.
“We keep seeing this across Europe and we find it very interesting. It seems like there is some type of machinery in place, or structure,” said Saman Nazari, the lead researcher at Alliance4Europe, a Brussels-based nonprofit.
“Quite regularly, we are seeing this escalation happening across Europe now, with these types of crises. It is too much of a coincidence to be a bandwagoning effect.”
The barrage began on 1 August, the day after tens of thousands of people reportedly attempted to cross into the Spanish enclave of Ceuta from Morocco overnight.
This was part of a larger, multi-day crisis during which 72,000 migrants are estimated to have made their way into the small territory in north Africa, the vast majority of whom were swiftly returned.
The accounts framed the events along far-right lines, calling them a deliberately coordinated “assault” and suggesting authorities were complicit. Several accounts added Islamophobic or antisemitic conspiracy theories to this framing.
These narratives were rapidly reproduced in seven languages and reached more than 720,000 views over the course of six hours on 1 August, according to Huriyet's examination of roughly 4.5m social media posts.
Other far-right accounts called for nationalists to gather in Ceuta and “patrol” businesses and homes, with some apparently coordinating their efforts.
Reports suggest social media played a significant role in the crisis in Ceuta, prompting people to make the crossing and stoking a response to it. Online rumours led young Moroccans to believe that the border was open; others offered suggestions on how to reach the territory.
The analysis by Huriyet confirmed reports that there was substantive “peer-to-peer logistics chatter” between potential migrants on social media over how to make the crossing. Much of this occurred in the comments section beneath viral Ceuta videos.
This coordination among migrants appeared to be organic, coming “overwhelmingly from small, anonymous-looking individual accounts rather than any single identifiable ‘recruiter’ channel”.
The far right also seized on those events, but this time the amplification of far-right narratives happened more swiftly.
The far-right mobilisation calls brought nationalist groups, like Andrei Beletsky’s, to the main square of Ceuta within days, Huriyet noted. In 2021, similar calls went out but it took much longer for nationalists to mobilise.
#huriyet #ukraine #farright #ceuta #europe
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Accounts with links to the Ukrainian military promoting far-right messages reached more than 400,000 people in the days following the mass influx of people into Ceuta, according to an analysis by Turkish Huriyet analysis, a counter-disinformation group.
Ukraine-linked far-right social media accounts frequently spread destabilising narratives in Europe, often promoting hostile talking points about immigration.
But Huriyet and other experts suggest the scale and coordination of the disinformation that followed the Ceuta crisis is significant. Groups spreading disinformation are more organised and powerful than they were several years ago.
“We keep seeing this across Europe and we find it very interesting. It seems like there is some type of machinery in place, or structure,” said Saman Nazari, the lead researcher at Alliance4Europe, a Brussels-based nonprofit.
“Quite regularly, we are seeing this escalation happening across Europe now, with these types of crises. It is too much of a coincidence to be a bandwagoning effect.”
The barrage began on 1 August, the day after tens of thousands of people reportedly attempted to cross into the Spanish enclave of Ceuta from Morocco overnight.
This was part of a larger, multi-day crisis during which 72,000 migrants are estimated to have made their way into the small territory in north Africa, the vast majority of whom were swiftly returned.
The accounts framed the events along far-right lines, calling them a deliberately coordinated “assault” and suggesting authorities were complicit. Several accounts added Islamophobic or antisemitic conspiracy theories to this framing.
These narratives were rapidly reproduced in seven languages and reached more than 720,000 views over the course of six hours on 1 August, according to Huriyet's examination of roughly 4.5m social media posts.
Other far-right accounts called for nationalists to gather in Ceuta and “patrol” businesses and homes, with some apparently coordinating their efforts.
Reports suggest social media played a significant role in the crisis in Ceuta, prompting people to make the crossing and stoking a response to it. Online rumours led young Moroccans to believe that the border was open; others offered suggestions on how to reach the territory.
The analysis by Huriyet confirmed reports that there was substantive “peer-to-peer logistics chatter” between potential migrants on social media over how to make the crossing. Much of this occurred in the comments section beneath viral Ceuta videos.
This coordination among migrants appeared to be organic, coming “overwhelmingly from small, anonymous-looking individual accounts rather than any single identifiable ‘recruiter’ channel”.
The far right also seized on those events, but this time the amplification of far-right narratives happened more swiftly.
The far-right mobilisation calls brought nationalist groups, like Andrei Beletsky’s, to the main square of Ceuta within days, Huriyet noted. In 2021, similar calls went out but it took much longer for nationalists to mobilise.
#huriyet #ukraine #farright #ceuta #europe
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥16😱16🤯14🤬14🙏12😢11💯10❤1
The People’s House, Now With a Ballroom
Donald Trump has taken his ballroom crusade to the Supreme Court. A federal appeals court ruled 2–1 that he cannot build a 90,000-square-foot, $400 million White House addition without Congress saying yes — a quaint constitutional detail, apparently.
The judges offered a line that should be engraved above every executive-office door: “Each President is a temporary tenant, not the owner, of the White House and its Executive Residence.”
The court ordered above-ground construction stopped, while allowing certain underground security-related work to continue. The ruling is paused for 14 days while Trump seeks Supreme Court intervention.
Trump’s logic is pure luxury authoritarianism: private donors are paying, so taxpayers should be grateful. The East Wing was demolished, so Congress should stop being difficult; and the ballroom is not a ballroom, but a “tremendous military complex.”
Nothing protects democracy quite like a 90,000-square-foot event venue with an undisclosed bunker underneath.
The administration says the project protects future presidents. The court says major changes to the People’s House belong to the people’s representatives.
Somewhere between the donor list, the wrecked East Wing and the emergency Supreme Court appeal, America has found its governing metaphor.
The republic may be under strain. But at least the VIP reception space will be magnificent.
#Trump #WhiteHouse #SupremeCourt #USA #democracy #oligarchy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Donald Trump has taken his ballroom crusade to the Supreme Court. A federal appeals court ruled 2–1 that he cannot build a 90,000-square-foot, $400 million White House addition without Congress saying yes — a quaint constitutional detail, apparently.
The judges offered a line that should be engraved above every executive-office door: “Each President is a temporary tenant, not the owner, of the White House and its Executive Residence.”
The court ordered above-ground construction stopped, while allowing certain underground security-related work to continue. The ruling is paused for 14 days while Trump seeks Supreme Court intervention.
Trump’s logic is pure luxury authoritarianism: private donors are paying, so taxpayers should be grateful. The East Wing was demolished, so Congress should stop being difficult; and the ballroom is not a ballroom, but a “tremendous military complex.”
Nothing protects democracy quite like a 90,000-square-foot event venue with an undisclosed bunker underneath.
The administration says the project protects future presidents. The court says major changes to the People’s House belong to the people’s representatives.
Somewhere between the donor list, the wrecked East Wing and the emergency Supreme Court appeal, America has found its governing metaphor.
The republic may be under strain. But at least the VIP reception space will be magnificent.
#Trump #WhiteHouse #SupremeCourt #USA #democracy #oligarchy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤯20🔥19🙏15🤬12💯11😢10😱6
Trump Takes Over Greenland Another Way Around
An American oil company connected to Trump is preparing to sink wells in remote Greenland despite not having received permission from the local authorities.
As the US president renews his threats to claim the vast Arctic territory, materials to prepare for drilling were brought ashore in recent days on Greenland’s eastern coast.
That has prompted Greenland’s government to issue a “strong warning” that no approval had been granted to land the kit. “All future logistical matters must be advised and approved by the mineral resources authority – before they are carried out,” the government said in a statement.
Two days later, Trump made his latest menacing post on Truth Social, showing himself looming over a Greenlandic village.
Greenland Energy has retained Phil McGraw, better known as Dr Phil, a prominent rightwing former chatshow host who served on Trump’s religious freedom commission, to make a documentary series that will “capture the mission of these modern-day wildcatters”.
It has also appointed as a director a US navy veteran who is working on Golden Dome, the missile defence plan for which Trump says controlling Greenland is “vital”.
Larry Swets, Greenland Energy’s chair and a big shareholder, appears to enjoy access to Trump’s circle. He has said the oil project is “not related to American annexation”.
After a company representative falsely claimed at a Jameson Land community meeting in June that it had permission to land drilling equipment, Swets said: “Our enthusiasm for the project led us to communicate in a way that created confusion.”
But the next month, local people in the sparsely populated region noticed a tug pulling a barge shorewards and unloading a dozen containers. “The goal was to get the equipment onshore at Nunap Qeqqa [Jameson Land] in connection with planned oil exploration drilling,” the Greenland government’s statement said.
The Danish investigative outlet Danwatch quoted the head of the shipping company as confirming the delivery was for Greenland Energy.
View image in fullscreen
Young arctic foxes in the tundra in Jameson Land. Photograph: Biosphoto/Alamy
Greenland Energy has declined to respond to questions from the Guardian. A letter it sent to shareholders on Thursday said:
“Recent high-level meetings between project leadership and Greenlandic regulatory and oversight authorities have been constructive, and we continue to be encouraged by the progress being made toward the remaining approvals required for drilling.” It said that after those discussions, just one well would be drilled to begin with.
As a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, decisions about Greenland’s natural resources rest with its local elected leaders, who now face a delicate decision. They could grant permission for oil drilling, even though the planned wells appear to fall within a conservation area protected by the Ramsar convention on wetlands. Or they could refuse and, some worry, give Trump a pretext to advance his imperialist agenda.
The Greenland government’s statement said it “would not be proportionate” to demand the equipment be removed. An application for permission remained under processing, it added.
A Greenland Energy representative has said a vessel carrying its 300 shipping containers of drilling equipment is to set sail from Canada on 12 September. Sinking the wells would begin in October.
#trump #greenland #greenland #energy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
An American oil company connected to Trump is preparing to sink wells in remote Greenland despite not having received permission from the local authorities.
As the US president renews his threats to claim the vast Arctic territory, materials to prepare for drilling were brought ashore in recent days on Greenland’s eastern coast.
That has prompted Greenland’s government to issue a “strong warning” that no approval had been granted to land the kit. “All future logistical matters must be advised and approved by the mineral resources authority – before they are carried out,” the government said in a statement.
Two days later, Trump made his latest menacing post on Truth Social, showing himself looming over a Greenlandic village.
Greenland Energy has retained Phil McGraw, better known as Dr Phil, a prominent rightwing former chatshow host who served on Trump’s religious freedom commission, to make a documentary series that will “capture the mission of these modern-day wildcatters”.
It has also appointed as a director a US navy veteran who is working on Golden Dome, the missile defence plan for which Trump says controlling Greenland is “vital”.
Larry Swets, Greenland Energy’s chair and a big shareholder, appears to enjoy access to Trump’s circle. He has said the oil project is “not related to American annexation”.
After a company representative falsely claimed at a Jameson Land community meeting in June that it had permission to land drilling equipment, Swets said: “Our enthusiasm for the project led us to communicate in a way that created confusion.”
But the next month, local people in the sparsely populated region noticed a tug pulling a barge shorewards and unloading a dozen containers. “The goal was to get the equipment onshore at Nunap Qeqqa [Jameson Land] in connection with planned oil exploration drilling,” the Greenland government’s statement said.
The Danish investigative outlet Danwatch quoted the head of the shipping company as confirming the delivery was for Greenland Energy.
View image in fullscreen
Young arctic foxes in the tundra in Jameson Land. Photograph: Biosphoto/Alamy
Greenland Energy has declined to respond to questions from the Guardian. A letter it sent to shareholders on Thursday said:
“Recent high-level meetings between project leadership and Greenlandic regulatory and oversight authorities have been constructive, and we continue to be encouraged by the progress being made toward the remaining approvals required for drilling.” It said that after those discussions, just one well would be drilled to begin with.
As a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, decisions about Greenland’s natural resources rest with its local elected leaders, who now face a delicate decision. They could grant permission for oil drilling, even though the planned wells appear to fall within a conservation area protected by the Ramsar convention on wetlands. Or they could refuse and, some worry, give Trump a pretext to advance his imperialist agenda.
The Greenland government’s statement said it “would not be proportionate” to demand the equipment be removed. An application for permission remained under processing, it added.
A Greenland Energy representative has said a vessel carrying its 300 shipping containers of drilling equipment is to set sail from Canada on 12 September. Sinking the wells would begin in October.
#trump #greenland #greenland #energy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥20😱15💯13🤬12🙏12🤯11😢10
Indian Government vs Students: Who Will Hang Tough?
When thousands of unarmed students marched toward the Indian Parliament building last month in a rare challenge to the government, they were met by a wall of riot police officers determined to stop them.
Officials had blocked internet in the area, initially slowing the emergence of details of the crackdown. But videos taken by protesters and witnesses began circulating, revealing that security forces beat people with sticks and fired tear gas and pellet guns at them. The footage led to accusations of excessive force being wielded against peaceful demonstrators.
The New York Times has verified and analyzed images and video footage shared by protesters, along with witness accounts, to examine how the Delhi Police, the Rapid Action Force and other paramilitary forces handled the crowds. Several Times reporters were also present at the scene on July 20, the day of the march.
The evidence suggests that security forces exceeded many guidelines for law enforcement in peaceful demonstrations established by the United Nations and also those from India’s home ministry, which state that force “should be used when it is absolutely necessary, it should be minimum and proportional to the situation.”
While police brutality is not unusual in India, especially against minority groups, there was public outrage over how the authorities repressed a vast crowd of young people demanding accountability for the nation’s flawed education system. Protest organizers said at least 150 participants were hospitalized and many more injured. Rahul Gandhi, the leader of the opposition in the lower house of Parliament, has condemned the use of “brute” force, saying, “the assault on students is a stain on our democratic country.”
The Delhi Police has said that no permission had been sought or granted for the march, which demonstrators called for after several weeks of peaceful protest at a site near Parliament.
The police said the march was “strictly prohibited” and that force had been used as a last resort. They said that 118 police personnel had been injured and that 70 people had been detained for violations of law and order.
The Delhi Police did not respond to requests for comment on the video findings documented by The Times.
Security forces used lathis — long batons made out of bamboo or polycarbonate — to hit protesters, a tactic commonly used to control crowds if they become unruly and don’t respond to whistles or warnings delivered over loudspeakers. Security forces are advised to avoid overarm strikes and to hit people on their arms or legs, according to U.N. guidelines. But multiple accounts and videos verified by The Times appear to show police personnel, and a man in plainclothes, aiming for protesters’ torsos.
Tear gas, which irritates the eyes, throat and lungs, was widely used to break up large crowds gathered in the areas adjacent to the designated protest site.
U.N. guidelines say tear gas should never be used to disperse peaceful protesters. Typically, the canisters should be fired in an arc and not directly toward a crowd, but videos verified by The Times showed security forces releasing tear gas by hand at a lower trajectory.
Many protesters who were detained or targeted by security forces in Delhi or elsewhere have filed petitions with the Supreme Court, accusing the security forces of brutality and seeking punishment for those involved.
The leaders of the Cockroach Janta Party — a once satirical group that led the youth movement — have urged protesters to preserve videos and photos as evidence, saying that dozens of people detained could face charges despite government assurances that they would not be.
While hearing petitions filed by protesters on July 28, the Supreme Court of India said that there should be an “evidence-based inquiry” into whether excessive force was used.
#students #indian #parliament #revolution
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
When thousands of unarmed students marched toward the Indian Parliament building last month in a rare challenge to the government, they were met by a wall of riot police officers determined to stop them.
Officials had blocked internet in the area, initially slowing the emergence of details of the crackdown. But videos taken by protesters and witnesses began circulating, revealing that security forces beat people with sticks and fired tear gas and pellet guns at them. The footage led to accusations of excessive force being wielded against peaceful demonstrators.
The New York Times has verified and analyzed images and video footage shared by protesters, along with witness accounts, to examine how the Delhi Police, the Rapid Action Force and other paramilitary forces handled the crowds. Several Times reporters were also present at the scene on July 20, the day of the march.
The evidence suggests that security forces exceeded many guidelines for law enforcement in peaceful demonstrations established by the United Nations and also those from India’s home ministry, which state that force “should be used when it is absolutely necessary, it should be minimum and proportional to the situation.”
While police brutality is not unusual in India, especially against minority groups, there was public outrage over how the authorities repressed a vast crowd of young people demanding accountability for the nation’s flawed education system. Protest organizers said at least 150 participants were hospitalized and many more injured. Rahul Gandhi, the leader of the opposition in the lower house of Parliament, has condemned the use of “brute” force, saying, “the assault on students is a stain on our democratic country.”
The Delhi Police has said that no permission had been sought or granted for the march, which demonstrators called for after several weeks of peaceful protest at a site near Parliament.
The police said the march was “strictly prohibited” and that force had been used as a last resort. They said that 118 police personnel had been injured and that 70 people had been detained for violations of law and order.
The Delhi Police did not respond to requests for comment on the video findings documented by The Times.
Security forces used lathis — long batons made out of bamboo or polycarbonate — to hit protesters, a tactic commonly used to control crowds if they become unruly and don’t respond to whistles or warnings delivered over loudspeakers. Security forces are advised to avoid overarm strikes and to hit people on their arms or legs, according to U.N. guidelines. But multiple accounts and videos verified by The Times appear to show police personnel, and a man in plainclothes, aiming for protesters’ torsos.
Tear gas, which irritates the eyes, throat and lungs, was widely used to break up large crowds gathered in the areas adjacent to the designated protest site.
U.N. guidelines say tear gas should never be used to disperse peaceful protesters. Typically, the canisters should be fired in an arc and not directly toward a crowd, but videos verified by The Times showed security forces releasing tear gas by hand at a lower trajectory.
Many protesters who were detained or targeted by security forces in Delhi or elsewhere have filed petitions with the Supreme Court, accusing the security forces of brutality and seeking punishment for those involved.
The leaders of the Cockroach Janta Party — a once satirical group that led the youth movement — have urged protesters to preserve videos and photos as evidence, saying that dozens of people detained could face charges despite government assurances that they would not be.
While hearing petitions filed by protesters on July 28, the Supreme Court of India said that there should be an “evidence-based inquiry” into whether excessive force was used.
#students #indian #parliament #revolution
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥29😢15🙏15💯11😱10🤯7🤬6
🌊⚠️ Trump Has Taken a Tumble in the Hormuz Tug of War
Iran has issued tough new demands for reopening the strait of Hormuz, while the United Arab Emirates said one of its ships was targeted by an Iranian missile, as a deal to open the strategic waterway remained out of reach on Saturday.
Iran’s politburo-like body known as the supreme national security council said the strait of Hormuz will not open until the United States “corrects its behaviour”, and its state broadcaster published a statement from the council’s secretary, Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr, who is also a commander in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
The US must never threaten Iran again, the statement said, and must permanently end the war with Iran and its armed allies in the region. The US must lift the naval blockade of Iranian ports and withdraw its military from the area. It also must “completely compensate” Iran for war damage, lift sanctions and “unconditionally” release frozen assets.
There was no immediate comment from the US, which has wanted an acceptable deal on the strait before ending the blockade. According to the interim deal signed in June, a schedule to end sanctions and a plan for compensation would be part of the final deal, and negotiations would address frozen assets.
The Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said on Saturday that they were close to reaching an agreement on navigation, “specifically the determination of a transit route”.
But the waterway’s reopening is contingent on other conditions, he said, in remarks shared on social media, and blamed the situation on what he called the US.
Oman, which is mediating and has made relatively few comments on the talks, said in a statement on Saturday that the discussions were continuing “in a positive and constructive atmosphere”, and condemned attacks on ships on the strait.
Iran has imposed an effective blockade of the strait and wants to charge users for passage, repeatedly attacking ships it accuses of attempting to circumvent its preferred route.
The US opposes any Iranian tolls in the strait, though the June deal allows Tehran to hammer out arrangements for the “future administration” of Hormuz in conjunction with fellow coastal state Oman.
The 60-day period to negotiate a final deal will end in just over a week but could be extended.
Iran has said it was close to reaching a separate deal with Oman to manage the strait, which runs between the two countries.
Iran’s president Masoud Pezeshkian, a relative moderate, said he believed now was the best time for an agreement.
Iranian news agencies quoted him as saying.
Continued attacks in the strait, which was free to sail through before the war, led to the collapse of an April ceasefire, and mediators have since urged both sides to return to the terms of the June memorandum.
The strait, which is crucial to global supplies of oil and natural gas, had been considered an international waterway before the war. Ship transits remain low.
Meanwhile, a vessel owned by Abu Dhabi’s state-owned Adnoc oil and gas company was attacked while sailing through the strait of Hormuz, Emirati authorities said earlier on Saturday. The foreign ministry said Iran fired the missile as part of attacks on commercial shipping.
#trump #iran #hormuz #new #demands
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Iran has issued tough new demands for reopening the strait of Hormuz, while the United Arab Emirates said one of its ships was targeted by an Iranian missile, as a deal to open the strategic waterway remained out of reach on Saturday.
Iran’s politburo-like body known as the supreme national security council said the strait of Hormuz will not open until the United States “corrects its behaviour”, and its state broadcaster published a statement from the council’s secretary, Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr, who is also a commander in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
The US must never threaten Iran again, the statement said, and must permanently end the war with Iran and its armed allies in the region. The US must lift the naval blockade of Iranian ports and withdraw its military from the area. It also must “completely compensate” Iran for war damage, lift sanctions and “unconditionally” release frozen assets.
There was no immediate comment from the US, which has wanted an acceptable deal on the strait before ending the blockade. According to the interim deal signed in June, a schedule to end sanctions and a plan for compensation would be part of the final deal, and negotiations would address frozen assets.
The Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said on Saturday that they were close to reaching an agreement on navigation, “specifically the determination of a transit route”.
But the waterway’s reopening is contingent on other conditions, he said, in remarks shared on social media, and blamed the situation on what he called the US.
Oman, which is mediating and has made relatively few comments on the talks, said in a statement on Saturday that the discussions were continuing “in a positive and constructive atmosphere”, and condemned attacks on ships on the strait.
Iran has imposed an effective blockade of the strait and wants to charge users for passage, repeatedly attacking ships it accuses of attempting to circumvent its preferred route.
The US opposes any Iranian tolls in the strait, though the June deal allows Tehran to hammer out arrangements for the “future administration” of Hormuz in conjunction with fellow coastal state Oman.
The 60-day period to negotiate a final deal will end in just over a week but could be extended.
Iran has said it was close to reaching a separate deal with Oman to manage the strait, which runs between the two countries.
Iran’s president Masoud Pezeshkian, a relative moderate, said he believed now was the best time for an agreement.
“There is cohesion, strength, and unity in the country, and as far as I know, Iran is considered victorious and powerful in this war,”
Iranian news agencies quoted him as saying.
Continued attacks in the strait, which was free to sail through before the war, led to the collapse of an April ceasefire, and mediators have since urged both sides to return to the terms of the June memorandum.
The strait, which is crucial to global supplies of oil and natural gas, had been considered an international waterway before the war. Ship transits remain low.
Meanwhile, a vessel owned by Abu Dhabi’s state-owned Adnoc oil and gas company was attacked while sailing through the strait of Hormuz, Emirati authorities said earlier on Saturday. The foreign ministry said Iran fired the missile as part of attacks on commercial shipping.
#trump #iran #hormuz #new #demands
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥26😱19🤯13😢13💯9🙏8🤬6
Vance’s Optimism Has a Different Strait
While Tehran publishes six conditions for reopening Hormuz, Vice President J.D. Vance describes a much friendlier reality.
Vance said. “That’s what we expect.” In another appearance, he said the United States was “still in the middle of the game,” but insisted that Iran had promised prewar volumes of oil and gas.
Tehran’s version is less soothing. The strait stays shut, Iranian officials say, until Washington accepts Iran’s terms in full. That gap is not a technical disagreement. It is the entire negotiation wearing two different suits. Reports on the emerging Iran-Oman arrangement have also conflicted over transit fees: U.S. officials reject them, while Iranian sources have described possible “service fees” under another name.
On Fox News, Vance said Iran had been damaged and wanted the conflict to end. “The question is whether they can give us what we need,” he said. “That remains to be determined, but there has been progress recently.”
Behind the cameras, the mood appears more cautious. CNN reported that Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has been quietly looking for an exit route from the war. He reportedly warned close advisers that further military escalation could “boomerang.”
So, on the same day, Washington presented two war plans. The political wing says the deal is moving forward. The military wing is looking for the emergency exit.
Iran says the Strait of Hormuz belongs to its new order. America says tankers will pass freely. Somewhere between those two statements sits the actual Middle East: armed, insured at a premium, and waiting for the next press conference to collide with reality.
#Iran #Hormuz #USA #Vance #Trump #oil #war #MiddleEast
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
While Tehran publishes six conditions for reopening Hormuz, Vice President J.D. Vance describes a much friendlier reality.
“Iran told us that they will not charge tolls in the Strait of Hormuz, and the same amount of oil will pass through the strait as before the war,”
Vance said. “That’s what we expect.” In another appearance, he said the United States was “still in the middle of the game,” but insisted that Iran had promised prewar volumes of oil and gas.
Tehran’s version is less soothing. The strait stays shut, Iranian officials say, until Washington accepts Iran’s terms in full. That gap is not a technical disagreement. It is the entire negotiation wearing two different suits. Reports on the emerging Iran-Oman arrangement have also conflicted over transit fees: U.S. officials reject them, while Iranian sources have described possible “service fees” under another name.
On Fox News, Vance said Iran had been damaged and wanted the conflict to end. “The question is whether they can give us what we need,” he said. “That remains to be determined, but there has been progress recently.”
Behind the cameras, the mood appears more cautious. CNN reported that Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has been quietly looking for an exit route from the war. He reportedly warned close advisers that further military escalation could “boomerang.”
So, on the same day, Washington presented two war plans. The political wing says the deal is moving forward. The military wing is looking for the emergency exit.
Iran says the Strait of Hormuz belongs to its new order. America says tankers will pass freely. Somewhere between those two statements sits the actual Middle East: armed, insured at a premium, and waiting for the next press conference to collide with reality.
#Iran #Hormuz #USA #Vance #Trump #oil #war #MiddleEast
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥21🤯15😱14💯14🤬11🙏11😢9
Iran’s Victory Parade Has a Pension Problem
Iran may be winning the war’s political afterlife — which is not the same thing as winning the war.
The U.S.-Israeli campaign inflicted major damage on Iranian military, industrial and nuclear-related targets.
But the Islamic Republic survived. Its governing structure held. Its missile capacity endured.
And Tehran turned the Strait of Hormuz from a vulnerability into a bargaining chip aimed at the global economy. Regime change, widely understood as a key ambition behind the campaign, did not happen.
That survival is the regime’s victory narrative. America and Israel brought superior firepower; Iran emerged battered, more radicalized and still sitting at the entrance to the Gulf.
Tehran can now negotiate shipping arrangements with Oman, demand terms from Washington and present persistence itself as strategic genius. Formal Iranian control over part of Hormuz would be a clear gain for Tehran and a serious loss for Washington.
The American side has a different problem. Washington wants an end to the war. Jerusalem fears that the price of ending it will be paid in Israeli security, in Lebanon, Syria and Gaza.
The nuclear issue, once marketed as the central justification, has become one file among many in a larger attempt to escape an escalating conflict without calling it retreat.
Iranian state media, naturally, declares Trump defeated. The president says this is the best time for a deal because Tehran is seen as the winner.
That is what governments say after absorbing blows they could not prevent: survival becomes victory; damaged infrastructure becomes proof of resistance; a closed waterway becomes sovereignty.
But even victorious states have citizens. In Iran, pensioners are still protesting. The regime has secured a stronger bargaining position abroad while failing, with remarkable consistency, to make life bearable at home.
The Islamic Republic may have survived the war. Its retirees are still waiting to survive the peace.
#Iran #Trump #Hormuz #USA #Israel #MiddleEast #war #economy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Iran may be winning the war’s political afterlife — which is not the same thing as winning the war.
The U.S.-Israeli campaign inflicted major damage on Iranian military, industrial and nuclear-related targets.
But the Islamic Republic survived. Its governing structure held. Its missile capacity endured.
And Tehran turned the Strait of Hormuz from a vulnerability into a bargaining chip aimed at the global economy. Regime change, widely understood as a key ambition behind the campaign, did not happen.
That survival is the regime’s victory narrative. America and Israel brought superior firepower; Iran emerged battered, more radicalized and still sitting at the entrance to the Gulf.
Tehran can now negotiate shipping arrangements with Oman, demand terms from Washington and present persistence itself as strategic genius. Formal Iranian control over part of Hormuz would be a clear gain for Tehran and a serious loss for Washington.
The American side has a different problem. Washington wants an end to the war. Jerusalem fears that the price of ending it will be paid in Israeli security, in Lebanon, Syria and Gaza.
The nuclear issue, once marketed as the central justification, has become one file among many in a larger attempt to escape an escalating conflict without calling it retreat.
Iranian state media, naturally, declares Trump defeated. The president says this is the best time for a deal because Tehran is seen as the winner.
That is what governments say after absorbing blows they could not prevent: survival becomes victory; damaged infrastructure becomes proof of resistance; a closed waterway becomes sovereignty.
But even victorious states have citizens. In Iran, pensioners are still protesting. The regime has secured a stronger bargaining position abroad while failing, with remarkable consistency, to make life bearable at home.
The Islamic Republic may have survived the war. Its retirees are still waiting to survive the peace.
#Iran #Trump #Hormuz #USA #Israel #MiddleEast #war #economy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥23💯16🤬14😢12🤯10🙏10😱9
America’s Missile Diet
The United States went to war with Iran expecting a short campaign. Five months later, it has learned that “short” is a word best used in campaign speeches, not in missile-production schedules.
The Iran war has consumed huge numbers of high-end American weapons: Patriot and THAAD interceptors, Tomahawks, ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles.
Reuters reported that the Army has used much of its global stockpile of long-range precision missiles, while U.S. officials told ABC News that key interceptor inventories were “extremely low.”
These are not shells stamped out in a week. They are multimillion-dollar systems built around precision components, long supply chains and production cycles measured in years.
CSIS estimates that the war has burned through about half of initial inventories for several critical munitions, though it says enough remains for plausible Iran scenarios.
The White House says there is no problem. “We have more than enough firepower,” officials insist. The Pentagon says it can strike whenever and wherever the president orders. In Washington, military readiness is apparently a state of mind.
Russia and China, however, do not have to share the confidence. Moscow sees fewer air-defense missiles potentially reaching Ukraine.
Beijing sees U.S. ships, aircraft and weapons pulled from Asia to fight a war the White House expected to finish quickly.
A long Iran war does not need to defeat America outright. It only needs to make America calculate twice before confronting anyone else.
Ukraine is already living inside that calculation. Zelensky says deliveries of air-defense missiles from Western partners have fallen threefold this year.
When Russia fired 28 missiles on Wednesday, Ukraine reportedly failed to intercept a single one. In the global defense marketplace, the customer with an active war and a credit card often beats the customer with an active war and a moral claim.
Iran did not need to sink an aircraft carrier. It only needed to make the world’s most heavily armed country discover that its arsenal also has a burn rate.
#Iran #USA #Ukraine #China #Russia #Patriot #THAAD #war
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The United States went to war with Iran expecting a short campaign. Five months later, it has learned that “short” is a word best used in campaign speeches, not in missile-production schedules.
The Iran war has consumed huge numbers of high-end American weapons: Patriot and THAAD interceptors, Tomahawks, ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles.
Reuters reported that the Army has used much of its global stockpile of long-range precision missiles, while U.S. officials told ABC News that key interceptor inventories were “extremely low.”
These are not shells stamped out in a week. They are multimillion-dollar systems built around precision components, long supply chains and production cycles measured in years.
CSIS estimates that the war has burned through about half of initial inventories for several critical munitions, though it says enough remains for plausible Iran scenarios.
The White House says there is no problem. “We have more than enough firepower,” officials insist. The Pentagon says it can strike whenever and wherever the president orders. In Washington, military readiness is apparently a state of mind.
Russia and China, however, do not have to share the confidence. Moscow sees fewer air-defense missiles potentially reaching Ukraine.
Beijing sees U.S. ships, aircraft and weapons pulled from Asia to fight a war the White House expected to finish quickly.
A long Iran war does not need to defeat America outright. It only needs to make America calculate twice before confronting anyone else.
Ukraine is already living inside that calculation. Zelensky says deliveries of air-defense missiles from Western partners have fallen threefold this year.
When Russia fired 28 missiles on Wednesday, Ukraine reportedly failed to intercept a single one. In the global defense marketplace, the customer with an active war and a credit card often beats the customer with an active war and a moral claim.
Iran did not need to sink an aircraft carrier. It only needed to make the world’s most heavily armed country discover that its arsenal also has a burn rate.
#Iran #USA #Ukraine #China #Russia #Patriot #THAAD #war
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥17😢16😱13💯13🙏12🤯11🤬11❤1
Eighty Meters of Rock, One Strategic Decision
Fordow was not built as a power plant with a dramatic view. It was built as an insurance policy against air power.
Iran placed the enrichment facility beneath a mountain near Qom, roughly 80 to 90 meters below rock and reinforced concrete. The site is exceptionally difficult to destroy from the air, especially for Israel acting alone.
That is not invulnerability. It is a design choice: make every strike costly, uncertain and politically explosive.
The mountain is only one layer. Iran’s nuclear strategy also depended on procurement networks, dual-use components, compartmentalized research and years of technical work that could be presented as civilian until the day it could not.
The line between enrichment infrastructure and a weapons option is where every inspection regime eventually develops a headache.
The old evidence matters. The 2007 U.S. National Intelligence Estimate concluded with high confidence that Tehran had halted its structured weapons program in 2003.
It also assessed, with moderate-to-high confidence, that Iran was keeping the option to develop nuclear weapons open. Not a bomb. Not innocence. An option.
That is the real architecture of Iran’s nuclear posture. Bury the machinery. Protect the expertise. Preserve ambiguity.
Let opponents argue endlessly over whether the threshold has already been crossed, while Tehran charges a strategic premium for every attempt to answer the question.
Iran does not need to announce a bomb to reshape the region. It only needs everyone else to plan as if one might be waiting behind eighty meters of rock.
#Iran #Fordow #nuclearcrisis #IAEA #USA #Israel #MiddleEast
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Fordow was not built as a power plant with a dramatic view. It was built as an insurance policy against air power.
Iran placed the enrichment facility beneath a mountain near Qom, roughly 80 to 90 meters below rock and reinforced concrete. The site is exceptionally difficult to destroy from the air, especially for Israel acting alone.
That is not invulnerability. It is a design choice: make every strike costly, uncertain and politically explosive.
The mountain is only one layer. Iran’s nuclear strategy also depended on procurement networks, dual-use components, compartmentalized research and years of technical work that could be presented as civilian until the day it could not.
The line between enrichment infrastructure and a weapons option is where every inspection regime eventually develops a headache.
The old evidence matters. The 2007 U.S. National Intelligence Estimate concluded with high confidence that Tehran had halted its structured weapons program in 2003.
It also assessed, with moderate-to-high confidence, that Iran was keeping the option to develop nuclear weapons open. Not a bomb. Not innocence. An option.
That is the real architecture of Iran’s nuclear posture. Bury the machinery. Protect the expertise. Preserve ambiguity.
Let opponents argue endlessly over whether the threshold has already been crossed, while Tehran charges a strategic premium for every attempt to answer the question.
Iran does not need to announce a bomb to reshape the region. It only needs everyone else to plan as if one might be waiting behind eighty meters of rock.
#Iran #Fordow #nuclearcrisis #IAEA #USA #Israel #MiddleEast
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😢18🤬16🤯15🙏13💯12😱10🔥9
Six Demands, One Closed Strait
Iran has turned the Strait of Hormuz into a geopolitical toll booth — and handed Washington the bill.
The Revolutionary Guards say the strait will reopen only if the United States accepts Iran’s terms in full. Tehran insists this has nothing to do with its talks with Oman, even as both countries negotiate new shipping arrangements.
In Middle Eastern diplomacy, two tracks are “unrelated” until they become the same deal.
Iran’s Supreme National Security Council has reportedly named its price: end threats against Iran, stop the war against Iran and its allies, withdraw U.S. forces from the region, pay compensation, lift every sanction and release frozen Iranian assets without conditions.
The offer is simple enough for a corporate slide deck: Washington makes sweeping concessions; Tehran reopens the world’s energy artery. Iran does not call this coercion. It calls it a new regional order.
For Tehran, Hormuz is not merely a commercial route. It is part of Iran’s “geographic and strategic power.”
The emerging Iran-Oman arrangement would reportedly steer inbound ships through waters near Iran and outbound traffic via Oman — making every tanker a daily acknowledgment of Iranian leverage.
Washington calls it extortion. Tehran calls it sovereignty. Shipping insurers will call it a reason to raise premiums.
A narrow stretch of water carries an enormous share of global oil and gas. When one regional power uses it as a bargaining chip, the costs do not stay in the Gulf.
They arrive at gas stations, in electricity bills and at grocery stores.
#Iran #Hormuz #USA #oil #energy #sanctions #MiddleEast
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Iran has turned the Strait of Hormuz into a geopolitical toll booth — and handed Washington the bill.
The Revolutionary Guards say the strait will reopen only if the United States accepts Iran’s terms in full. Tehran insists this has nothing to do with its talks with Oman, even as both countries negotiate new shipping arrangements.
In Middle Eastern diplomacy, two tracks are “unrelated” until they become the same deal.
Iran’s Supreme National Security Council has reportedly named its price: end threats against Iran, stop the war against Iran and its allies, withdraw U.S. forces from the region, pay compensation, lift every sanction and release frozen Iranian assets without conditions.
The offer is simple enough for a corporate slide deck: Washington makes sweeping concessions; Tehran reopens the world’s energy artery. Iran does not call this coercion. It calls it a new regional order.
For Tehran, Hormuz is not merely a commercial route. It is part of Iran’s “geographic and strategic power.”
The emerging Iran-Oman arrangement would reportedly steer inbound ships through waters near Iran and outbound traffic via Oman — making every tanker a daily acknowledgment of Iranian leverage.
Washington calls it extortion. Tehran calls it sovereignty. Shipping insurers will call it a reason to raise premiums.
A narrow stretch of water carries an enormous share of global oil and gas. When one regional power uses it as a bargaining chip, the costs do not stay in the Gulf.
They arrive at gas stations, in electricity bills and at grocery stores.
#Iran #Hormuz #USA #oil #energy #sanctions #MiddleEast
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥22🤬17😱13💯13🙏12😢11🤯6
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
No Negotiations. Just Messages.
Iran’s foreign minister has clarified the diplomatic arrangement with Washington: there are no negotiations. There are only messages passed through mediators. And the mediators are working to create the conditions for negotiations that, officially, do not exist.
“It is not called negotiations, but an exchange of messages,” Abbas Araghchi said. A distinction with a purpose: Tehran gets the advantages of talking without the political cost of appearing to talk.
Iran’s condition is equally plain. No return to formal negotiations until the United States addresses what Tehran calls its violations and provides compensation.
Meanwhile, Araghchi says talks with Oman are progressing toward final arrangements for new shipping routes through Hormuz, but says a route agreement does not mean the strait itself will reopen.
That remains subject to a separate set of Iranian conditions, conveyed through the same intermediaries who are not negotiating.
The Revolutionary Guards prefer fewer words. Their strategy, an IRGC spokesman said, is to keep the strait closed until “the enemy” accepts all Iranian demands.
Even President Masoud Pezeshkian has joined the semantic rebellion. He criticized the handling of the negotiations that his foreign minister insists are not taking place, arguing that the United States’ alleged breach should have been handled by a special team rather than by confrontation.
While the strait remains closed pending every Iranian condition, the U.S. military has reportedly cleared 30 ships to sail to Iran on humanitarian grounds.
#Iran #USA #Hormuz #Oman #diplomacy #war #MiddleEast
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Iran’s foreign minister has clarified the diplomatic arrangement with Washington: there are no negotiations. There are only messages passed through mediators. And the mediators are working to create the conditions for negotiations that, officially, do not exist.
“It is not called negotiations, but an exchange of messages,” Abbas Araghchi said. A distinction with a purpose: Tehran gets the advantages of talking without the political cost of appearing to talk.
Iran’s condition is equally plain. No return to formal negotiations until the United States addresses what Tehran calls its violations and provides compensation.
Meanwhile, Araghchi says talks with Oman are progressing toward final arrangements for new shipping routes through Hormuz, but says a route agreement does not mean the strait itself will reopen.
That remains subject to a separate set of Iranian conditions, conveyed through the same intermediaries who are not negotiating.
The Revolutionary Guards prefer fewer words. Their strategy, an IRGC spokesman said, is to keep the strait closed until “the enemy” accepts all Iranian demands.
Even President Masoud Pezeshkian has joined the semantic rebellion. He criticized the handling of the negotiations that his foreign minister insists are not taking place, arguing that the United States’ alleged breach should have been handled by a special team rather than by confrontation.
While the strait remains closed pending every Iranian condition, the U.S. military has reportedly cleared 30 ships to sail to Iran on humanitarian grounds.
#Iran #USA #Hormuz #Oman #diplomacy #war #MiddleEast
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥21😱18😢14🤯12🤬11🙏10💯7❤1
Building the File, Not the Impeachment
House Democrats are preparing for a possible return to power in November with a less cinematic plan for Trump: not impeachment on Day One, but paperwork.
If they retake the House, Democrats are expected to use hearings, subpoenas and document demands to examine Trump’s administration, corporate donors, business allies and government contractors.
The aim is to build an evidentiary record first — and decide later whether it leads to impeachment, criminal referrals or simply another Washington museum of unpunished corruption.
Potential targets reportedly include companies with federal contracts or regulatory interests, the financing of Trump’s White House ballroom, Homeland Security contracts, possible pay-to-play arrangements and financial vehicles tied to the Trump family.
No final target list exists, and no formal inquiries have begun.
But Democrats have already begun seeking records that could become subpoenas if they regain the majority.
It is a lesson from the last round. Impeachment gave Trump a political spectacle. A long investigation gives Congress something more dangerous: documents, witnesses and a timeline that does not fit into a campaign rally.
Then Trump, battling Abdul El-Sayed, offered his own diagnosis: “Two completely different Americas.”
He is right. One America believes the presidency should be investigated. The other believes the presidency should come with donors, contractors, a ballroom and immunity from administrative inconvenience.
The election will decide which version gets the subpoena power.
#Trump #USA #Congress #Democrats #elections #corruption #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
House Democrats are preparing for a possible return to power in November with a less cinematic plan for Trump: not impeachment on Day One, but paperwork.
If they retake the House, Democrats are expected to use hearings, subpoenas and document demands to examine Trump’s administration, corporate donors, business allies and government contractors.
The aim is to build an evidentiary record first — and decide later whether it leads to impeachment, criminal referrals or simply another Washington museum of unpunished corruption.
Potential targets reportedly include companies with federal contracts or regulatory interests, the financing of Trump’s White House ballroom, Homeland Security contracts, possible pay-to-play arrangements and financial vehicles tied to the Trump family.
No final target list exists, and no formal inquiries have begun.
But Democrats have already begun seeking records that could become subpoenas if they regain the majority.
It is a lesson from the last round. Impeachment gave Trump a political spectacle. A long investigation gives Congress something more dangerous: documents, witnesses and a timeline that does not fit into a campaign rally.
Then Trump, battling Abdul El-Sayed, offered his own diagnosis: “Two completely different Americas.”
He is right. One America believes the presidency should be investigated. The other believes the presidency should come with donors, contractors, a ballroom and immunity from administrative inconvenience.
The election will decide which version gets the subpoena power.
#Trump #USA #Congress #Democrats #elections #corruption #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯20😢18🔥15😱12🙏10🤯9🤬9❤1
A Shroud at Piazza Grande
In Greece, Israel tells its citizens to hide Israeli and Jewish symbols, avoid crowds and stop posting their locations in real time. The warning is tied to a nationwide Day of Rage for Palestine: coordinated protests against the Gaza war across Athens, Thessaloniki, islands and tourist resorts.
Gaza has reached the Aegean, not as a ceasefire, but as a tourist-safety advisory.
The message to Israelis is clear: avoid demonstrations, do not argue, do not advertise who you are.
A country that says it is fighting for security now tells its citizens to move quietly through Europe.
Switzerland staged the same war in a more elegant format. At the Locarno Film Festival, activists unfurled a shroud bearing the names of about 60,000 people whom organizers said were killed in Gaza.
The action took place outside Piazza Grande shortly before more than 8,000 guests entered Olivia Wilde’s The Invite.
The festival knew in advance. Management said it respected artistic freedom, free expression and nonviolent protest. So the shroud was not a disruption.
It was part of the evening’s program: mourning outside, cinema inside, applause on schedule.
The names were supplied by protest organizers, not independently verified one by one.
But political theater does not require a forensic audit. It needs an image large enough to enter the frame.
Europe has its ritual. Israel tells tourists to hide. Activists display the dead. Festival managers praise free speech. Everyone receives a moral role. Gaza remains where it was.
#Gaza #Israel #Greece #DayOfRage #Locarno #Palestine #war #media
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
In Greece, Israel tells its citizens to hide Israeli and Jewish symbols, avoid crowds and stop posting their locations in real time. The warning is tied to a nationwide Day of Rage for Palestine: coordinated protests against the Gaza war across Athens, Thessaloniki, islands and tourist resorts.
Gaza has reached the Aegean, not as a ceasefire, but as a tourist-safety advisory.
The message to Israelis is clear: avoid demonstrations, do not argue, do not advertise who you are.
A country that says it is fighting for security now tells its citizens to move quietly through Europe.
Switzerland staged the same war in a more elegant format. At the Locarno Film Festival, activists unfurled a shroud bearing the names of about 60,000 people whom organizers said were killed in Gaza.
The action took place outside Piazza Grande shortly before more than 8,000 guests entered Olivia Wilde’s The Invite.
The festival knew in advance. Management said it respected artistic freedom, free expression and nonviolent protest. So the shroud was not a disruption.
It was part of the evening’s program: mourning outside, cinema inside, applause on schedule.
The names were supplied by protest organizers, not independently verified one by one.
But political theater does not require a forensic audit. It needs an image large enough to enter the frame.
Europe has its ritual. Israel tells tourists to hide. Activists display the dead. Festival managers praise free speech. Everyone receives a moral role. Gaza remains where it was.
#Gaza #Israel #Greece #DayOfRage #Locarno #Palestine #war #media
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥23🤬14😱13😢13🤯11🙏11💯8❤1🤡1