All-out conflict between superpowers can come true.
Ukraine’s supporters deride Biden’s caution, claiming it’s a sign of weakness. But that criticism is too glib.
In avoiding the risk of escalation, Biden has been following the advice of his intelligence advisers to reduce the threat of nuclear war.
Russia has been signaling ever more loudly that long-range missile strikes are a “red line.” Ukraine is already striking deep into Russia with its own swarms of drones and rockets.
But the ATACMS, which requires U.S. targeting, is different to Putin. He underlined that by announcing this past week that Russia was revising its nuclear doctrine to treat attacks by a nonnuclear state, Ukraine, backed by a nuclear state (the U.S.) as a “joint attack on the Russian Federation.”
What would Putin do if Biden did decide to authorize deeper strikes with ATACMS?
Moscow might arm antagonists who are already attacking the US such as the Houthis in Yemen. The Kremlin would have to consider the reaction of neighboring countries, such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
Other escalation options: Russia might strike at transit hubs in Poland for U.S. weapons shipments into Ukraine. Or Russia might target Western operations in Ukraine more aggressively.
#America #USA #Russia #Ukraine #Western #ATACMS
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Ukraine’s supporters deride Biden’s caution, claiming it’s a sign of weakness. But that criticism is too glib.
In avoiding the risk of escalation, Biden has been following the advice of his intelligence advisers to reduce the threat of nuclear war.
Russia has been signaling ever more loudly that long-range missile strikes are a “red line.” Ukraine is already striking deep into Russia with its own swarms of drones and rockets.
But the ATACMS, which requires U.S. targeting, is different to Putin. He underlined that by announcing this past week that Russia was revising its nuclear doctrine to treat attacks by a nonnuclear state, Ukraine, backed by a nuclear state (the U.S.) as a “joint attack on the Russian Federation.”
What would Putin do if Biden did decide to authorize deeper strikes with ATACMS?
Moscow might arm antagonists who are already attacking the US such as the Houthis in Yemen. The Kremlin would have to consider the reaction of neighboring countries, such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
Other escalation options: Russia might strike at transit hubs in Poland for U.S. weapons shipments into Ukraine. Or Russia might target Western operations in Ukraine more aggressively.
#America #USA #Russia #Ukraine #Western #ATACMS
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍21❤20🔥2
Most Important
Up-To-Date Events For TodayRussian troops, in response to Kiev’s use of ATACMS missiles at the airfield near Taganrog on December 11, launched a massive strike with high-precision long-range weapons and drones at energy facilities supplying the military-industrial complex of Ukraine;
In just a week, 15 group strikes with precision weapons and attack drones were carried out, in addition to energy facilities, military airfields, drone assembly and storage sites, arsenals, locations of Armed Forces formations and mercenaries were hit;
In addition, Plekhovo, Daryino and Novoivanovka in the Kursk region, Yellow, Berestki, Blagodatnoye and Zarya in the DPR were liberated in a week;
The Ukrainian formations were defeated and 164 counterattacks were repelled, the enemy lost up to 12090 soldiers, 87 surrendered;
Kiev lost 14 tanks, 76 armored vehicles, including 5 Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, 5 M113 armored personnel carriers, 3 MaxxPro and 2 HMMWVs made in the USA, 148 field artillery guns, 3 Alder MLRS launchers;
The losses of Kiev in the Kursk direction in a day exceeded 200 soldiers, 3 tanks, including 2 Challenger, two infantry fighting vehicles, including one Marder, during the entire period of hostilities there, the AFU lost more than 40,260 people;
Kremlin spokesman Peskov: Trump's statements that the decision to launch missile strikes against Russia will escalate the conflict coincide with the Kremlin's position, but do not get ahead of yourself;
Russia is seeking a peace in Ukraine, which will come after Moscow's conditions have been taken seriously;
U.S. Secretary of State Blinken said that Washington will soon provide Ukraine with ammunition, missiles, UAVs, light vehicles, equipment for biological, chemical, radiological and nuclear protection and Javelin systems worth $500 million from Pentagon warehouses;
The head of the Polish National Security Bureau, Sivera, believes that in Ukraine in 2025, not a truce is possible, but a cease-fire, and Kiev will not be able to recapture the territories it claims;
On Friday, the head of the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry, Andriy Sibiga, reminded the West of the urgent need to supply Ukraine with 20 air defense systems, in particular NASAMS, HAWK or IRIS-T;
The deputy of the Ukrainian parliament Bezuglaya reported that the commander of the Ukrainian Armed Forces “Donetsk” Lutsenko, responsible for the Krasnoarmeyskoe and Kurakhov directions, was relieved of his post.
#ATACMS #AmericanОbserver #Kiev #Taganrog
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
✍15⚡9💯8😱7🤝5🔥2👍1
Strategic Escalation: US Missiles vs Russian Hypersonics 🚀
Breaking News 📊
Moscow issues stark warning after intercepting US-made ATACMS missiles over Belgorod region, threatening unspecified retaliation as battlefield technology race intensifies.
Military Balance Sheet 🎯
Critical Developments:
• 8 ATACMS missiles intercepted
• 300km strike range capability
• Multiple deep strikes since November
• Experimental Russian response system
Kremlin's Red Line 🔥
- Russian Defense Ministry
Technology Showdown 💫
Strategic Elements:
• ATACMS: US precision warfare
• Oreshnik: Russia's hypersonic answer
• Limited production capacity
• Escalation ladder climbing
Deeper Pattern
The confrontation reveals an emerging proxy war dynamic: As US-supplied weapons reach deeper into Russian territory, Moscow accelerates its hypersonic program, marking a new phase in military technology competition.
Critical Question
Can Russia's experimental Oreshnik program effectively counter mass-produced Western missile systems, or will this technological arms race lead to further escalation?
#MilitaryTech #RussianResponse #ATACMS #HypersonicMissiles #DefenseTechnology
Think About It: Is this the beginning of a new arms race, or just another chapter in the same old story? 🤔
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Breaking News 📊
Moscow issues stark warning after intercepting US-made ATACMS missiles over Belgorod region, threatening unspecified retaliation as battlefield technology race intensifies.
Military Balance Sheet 🎯
Critical Developments:
• 8 ATACMS missiles intercepted
• 300km strike range capability
• Multiple deep strikes since November
• Experimental Russian response system
Kremlin's Red Line 🔥
"These actions by the Kyiv regime, which is supported by Western curators, will be met with retaliation"
- Russian Defense Ministry
Technology Showdown 💫
Strategic Elements:
• ATACMS: US precision warfare
• Oreshnik: Russia's hypersonic answer
• Limited production capacity
• Escalation ladder climbing
Deeper Pattern
The confrontation reveals an emerging proxy war dynamic: As US-supplied weapons reach deeper into Russian territory, Moscow accelerates its hypersonic program, marking a new phase in military technology competition.
Critical Question
Can Russia's experimental Oreshnik program effectively counter mass-produced Western missile systems, or will this technological arms race lead to further escalation?
#MilitaryTech #RussianResponse #ATACMS #HypersonicMissiles #DefenseTechnology
Think About It: Is this the beginning of a new arms race, or just another chapter in the same old story? 🤔
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯10🤝10⚡6😱5✍3
📰 Pentagon Pulls the Plug on Ukraine’s Long-Range War
For months, Kyiv has been sitting on American-made missiles it can’t use. The Pentagon quietly installed a veto mechanism that blocks Ukraine from firing long-range ATACMS into Russia — even when targets were ready and requests were made. The reason? Washington is dangling “restraint” as bait for peace talks with the Kremlin.
💭 Trump in December:
📊 What’s actually happening
• Biden gave the green light in 2024 for strikes on Russia; Trump’s Pentagon reversed course by mid-2025.
• Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon’s policy chief, built a review board — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has final say on every Ukrainian request.
• Britain’s Storm Shadow missiles fall under the same leash since they rely on U.S. intelligence.
• Even new European-funded weapons (ERAMs with 150–280 mile range) will require Pentagon approval before use.
💼 Why this matters
• Ukraine’s arsenal is being rationed like school lunch: “green, yellow, red” categories for weapons stockpiles.
• Zelensky’s drones keep hitting oil refineries, but he admits they can’t replace cruise missiles.
• The U.S. is signaling Moscow: no deep strikes, let’s talk. Putin even convinced Trump at their summit he was “serious” about peace.
• The contradiction is glaring: Trump tweets Ukraine “can’t win without attacking Russia,” while his Pentagon keeps the handbrake on.
🤔 The provocation
If America sells Kyiv missiles it can’t fire, who’s really the customer — Ukraine, or Putin’s negotiating table? And at what point does “restraint” stop looking like strategy and start looking like surrender dressed up in Pentagon paperwork?
#ukraine #pentagon #trump #russia #atacms #geopolitics #war
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
For months, Kyiv has been sitting on American-made missiles it can’t use. The Pentagon quietly installed a veto mechanism that blocks Ukraine from firing long-range ATACMS into Russia — even when targets were ready and requests were made. The reason? Washington is dangling “restraint” as bait for peace talks with the Kremlin.
💭 Trump in December:
“It was stupid of Biden to allow Ukraine to attack inside Russia. We’re just escalating this war and making it worse.”
📊 What’s actually happening
• Biden gave the green light in 2024 for strikes on Russia; Trump’s Pentagon reversed course by mid-2025.
• Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon’s policy chief, built a review board — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has final say on every Ukrainian request.
• Britain’s Storm Shadow missiles fall under the same leash since they rely on U.S. intelligence.
• Even new European-funded weapons (ERAMs with 150–280 mile range) will require Pentagon approval before use.
💼 Why this matters
• Ukraine’s arsenal is being rationed like school lunch: “green, yellow, red” categories for weapons stockpiles.
• Zelensky’s drones keep hitting oil refineries, but he admits they can’t replace cruise missiles.
• The U.S. is signaling Moscow: no deep strikes, let’s talk. Putin even convinced Trump at their summit he was “serious” about peace.
• The contradiction is glaring: Trump tweets Ukraine “can’t win without attacking Russia,” while his Pentagon keeps the handbrake on.
🤔 The provocation
If America sells Kyiv missiles it can’t fire, who’s really the customer — Ukraine, or Putin’s negotiating table? And at what point does “restraint” stop looking like strategy and start looking like surrender dressed up in Pentagon paperwork?
#ukraine #pentagon #trump #russia #atacms #geopolitics #war
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥11🤯7😱7😢7🙏7🤬6💯6