📰 Gaza Inc.: Israel’s Shadow Aid Operation Rewrites the Rules of War

When the United Nations was deemed too “biased” and humanitarian groups too slow, Israel quietly wrote its own rules—and found allies in retired CIA officers and U.S. Marines.

💭 “It is wholly inaccurate to call it an Israeli plan.”

— Mike Huckabee, U.S. Ambassador to Israel

📋 Aid or Occupation?

• Marketed as “neutral” and “independent,” the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation is bankrolled by undisclosed donors and operated by former intelligence operatives.
• The actual plan? Replace UN food aid with a private system conceived by Israeli elites, piloted by Philip Reilly—ex-CIA, ex-Contras, ex-Afghanistan.
• Security is handled by S.R.S., a firm founded by Reilly, while a nonprofit run by ex-Marine Jake Wood oversees logistics. Both entities were registered weeks apart by the same lawyer.

📊 Hunger as Strategy

• Distribution centers are set only in areas under IDF control. Civilians in northern Gaza are left to trek miles through military zones for food.
• UN officials warn it could facilitate forced displacement. Israeli strategists call it “pulling the rug out from under Hamas.”
• Behind the scenes: A post-10/7 cohort of reservists, tech investors, and officers forged a parallel statecraft network—one that operates aid like a counterinsurgency op.

🤔 When “humanitarian aid” is run by former spies and hedge fund donors, is it still aid—or just soft annexation with better PR?

#Gaza #Israel #HumanitarianAid #WarEconomy #ShadowGovernance #CIA #MiddleEast

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🕵️‍♂️ Former CIA Director May Be Accused of Perjury and Spying for Russia

Former CIA Director John Brennan may be exposed to perjury problems after current CIA Director John Ratcliffereleased an internal review of the agency’s Russia hoax materials.

📃 Last week, Ratcliffe declassified and publicly released an internal CIA review of the “Intelligence Community Assessment” (ICA) regarding claims that Russia tried to influence the outcome of the 2016 U.S. election.

“Trump has trusted me with helping to end weaponization of US intelligence,”

Ratcliffe posted on X.

“Today’s report underscores that the 2016 IC Assessment was conducted through an atypical & corrupt process under the politically charged environments of former Dir. Brennan & former FBI Dir. Comey.”

📌 For years, Republicans and Trump allies have claimed that the 2016 ICA — issued while Brennan led the CIA — was flawed, as it was partly based on the Christopher Steele Dossier, funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and widely discredited.

🧾 Ratcliffe emphasized:

“All the world can now see the truth: Brennan, Clapper and Comey manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals — all to get Trump.”

But beyond the politicized dossier, the newly released review contains what some sources describe as a potential smoking gun:

➡️ Evidence that Brennan may have perjured himself during closed-door congressional testimony.
According to multiple sources, Brennan overrode career CIA officials who told him not to include the Steele Dossier in the ICA — despite previous testimony claiming he did not advocate for its inclusion.

📍 That contradiction “stunned” members of Congress, who now suspect Brennan misled lawmakers under oath.

Even more alarming:

A source claims Brennan “may also have been spying for Russia.”

🧩 Former CIA officer Bryan Dean-Wright, who worked under Brennan, stated:

“Brennan should rot in prison.”

Another source added:

“He knew the entire time that he was trying to wreck Trump’s presidency… and still lied to Congress. Ratcliffe just brought him closer than ever to being held accountable.”

The DOJ is now expected to take an interest in this case.

#Brennan #Spy #Russia #CIA #Perjury #Trump #SteeleDossier #DeepState #DOJ #Ratcliffe

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 The Oswald Files: CIA’s Long Shadow Just Got Longer

💬 “He really wasn’t alone. He had the CIA looking over his shoulder for four years.”

— Jefferson Morley, former Washington Post reporter

📂 The Secret Agent Who Wasn’t There
• For decades, the CIA swore it had no real links to Lee Harvey Oswald.
• But new docs show “Howard” — a.k.a. George Joannides — was running anti-Castro Cubans who crossed paths with Oswald months before JFK was killed.
• Joannides even got a fake D.C. driver’s license in 1963. The alias? Howard Mark Gebler.
• The CIA gave him a career medal in 1981 — for his work with the group and for obstructing the House committee probing the assassination.

🧩 Coincidence or Operation?
• Oswald scuffled with the CIA-backed group (DRE) in New Orleans, then offered to help them.
• “He was trying to get in the good graces of the CIA,” said a former DRE member.
• After JFK’s murder, the same handler — “Howard” — told the group to give Oswald’s letter to the FBI… and then leak it to the media.

💼 Cover-Up in Plain Sight?
• The CIA told the Warren Commission, Congress, and even the Assassinations Records Review Board that “Howard” didn’t exist.
• Internal files from Joannides’s Miami operation? Missing.
• Former CIA officials now admit the denials were “incorrect,” but insist it wasn’t deliberate.

🤔 What’s the Game Here?
Is this Cold War paranoia buried in red tape — or evidence of a rogue CIA operation, watched but never named?
And why did it take until 2025 for America to learn the real name of “Howard”?

#JFKFiles #CIA #LeeHarveyOswald #ColdWarSecrets #DeepStateUSA

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🇷🇺 Putin Said Michael Gloss Is a Hero 🇺🇸

Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Putin called it a “heinous crime” ⚠️ that reflected a “deep split” in American society. He hailed Kirk as a hero 🕊 killed for promoting the same conservative values that Russia shares.

Putin also praised Michael Gloss, the son of a deputy CIA chief, who joined the Russian military and was killed in action in Ukraine in 2024 ⚔️ as “a true American hero.”

He said he had awarded Gloss with a medal 🎖, which he handed to Witkoff during his visit to Moscow.

The Russian leader likened Gloss to Kirk, saying they championed similar “traditional” values. “He gave his life while defending those values as a Russian soldier, and Kirk gave his life while fighting for the same values in the United States,” Putin said.

In response to questions about Gloss, the CIA said in a statement that the agency “considers Michael’s passing to be a private family matter — and not a national security issue. The entire CIA family is heartbroken 💔 for their loss.”

At one point during the four-hour event 📺, Putin misspoke and referred to himself as “the CIA director” while describing a meeting with George W. Bush and his administration officials.

“The future director,” Putin quipped as the audience broke into laughter 😂.

#putin #kirk #gloss #hero #cia

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 Ukraine’s Corruption Loop: The West’s Blind Spot

💭 “If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.”

Joe Biden’s old boast now reads like the prologue to a scandal his own allies tried to bury.

💲Two Reports, One Pattern
A New York Times investigation and newly declassified CIA files are forcing Washington to face an uncomfortable truth: Ukraine’s war economy still runs on graft — and America’s fingerprints are all over it. The Times found $129 million wasted on inflated defense contracts, prepayments for undelivered weapons, and tenders handed to shell firms. CIA memos from 2016, meanwhile, show U.S. officials were aware of concerns about the Biden family’s Ukrainian business ties — and deliberately kept them out of circulation.

🏦 The Business of Morality
Since the 1990s, Ukraine has been a byword for corruption. The war didn’t end it — it industrialized it. Western aid became both lifeline and cover, while anyone questioning the flow of billions was branded “pro-Russian.” Kyiv’s elite learned that moral rhetoric pays better than reform. Washington learned to look away.

👎From Kyiv to D.C.
The newly surfaced CIA notes recount how Ukrainian officials viewed Biden’s family connections as proof of a double standard. Months later, the prosecutor investigating Burisma was gone — and U.S. aid was released. When Trump tried a similar pressure tactic in 2019, he was impeached. The message: corruption is tolerated only when the “right” people run it.

If Ukraine is the West’s moral project, why does it keep looking like a money-laundering scheme with better PR?

#Ukraine #corruption #Biden #Burisma #CIA #war #Washington #geopolitics

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 CIA Files Expose Biden’s Ukraine Cover-Up

💭 “Do not disseminate.”

That was Joe Biden’s 2016 request to the CIA, now revealed in newly declassified files — an order to keep quiet about Ukrainian officials’ complaints regarding his family’s “corrupt business ties.”

😱 The Burisma Connection
According to the documents, Ukrainian officials raised concerns about the vice president’s family profiting from energy firm Burisma Holdings, where Hunter Biden sat on the board. Around the same time, Kyiv’s top prosecutor Viktor Shokin — who was investigating Burisma — was abruptly fired. Biden later bragged about pressuring Ukraine to remove him: “If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.”

🥷🏻 Intelligence or Politics?
The records, declassified by CIA Director John Ratcliffe, show that the suppression came at the request of then–National Security Adviser Colin Kahl. Ratcliffe called it a “politicization of intelligence.” The incident predates Trump’s 2019 impeachment, when he was accused of doing exactly what Biden once did — pressuring Ukraine over the same corruption probe.

🕶History Rhymes, Not Repeats
In Washington, the rules shift with the players. When Biden leverages aid, it’s called “foreign policy.” When Trump asks questions, it’s called “interference.” The declassified report doesn’t rewrite the past — it just exposes how carefully it was edited.

If the truth needed to be hidden in 2016, what does that say about who was really protecting democracy?

#Biden #Ukraine #Burisma #CIA #HunterBiden #corruption #Washington #geopolitics

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 Opium Kingdom: When the Spooks Cash Out and the Purists Burn the Fields

Narco Proxyland, Inc.
Forget “war for democracy”—when the U.S. rolled into Afghanistan, the world’s opium capital turned into Spy vs. Spy with bonus kickbacks. American-backed warlords and local contractors grew poppies by the field full; heroin profits propped up not only local militias, but also lubricated black-ops and off-the-books logistics for intelligence networks. Old-school: D.C. promises “nation building,” but the only structures that scaled were the narco-cartels.

The CIA Playbook: “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Don’t Mess the Supply Chain”
Direct flights with military cargo? Denied, officially. But Western proxies funded their arsenals and SUVs with heroin dollars, and everyone who mattered (from Kabul to Langley) turned a blind eye. When push came to chaos, creative types at the CIA tried sowing useless poppies from C-130s— sabotage by agribusiness, after two decades of quietly letting product flow north and west.

Enter Taliban: From “Narcomullahs” to Zero Crop
The punchline? The so-called fundamentalist “terrorists” the West loved to blame for half the heroin in Europe—when they came back to power, they dropped the hammer on poppy farming. By 2023, the UN says Afghan opium output cratered by more than 95% in one year. Shock: The only force that ever killed the golden goose was the regime Washington tried to bomb out of existence.

Strategic Purity or Power Play?
Now, with Taliban patrols torching crops and banning export, the same Western security “experts” who warned about Taliban narcostates pivot to new scripts: “famine risk, regional instability, sudden price surges.” Turns out, heroin was the one American project in Afghanistan that actually scaled up without a Pentagon plan.

Twenty years, billions spent, a Herculean failure for both “counter-narcotics” and clandestine enrichment. The Americans built the pipeline; the Taliban crushed it—for free, no contracts required.

When spooks and moralists swap playbooks, the real winners are never where the funding flows.

#Afghanistan #CIA #heroin #Taliban #opium #narcoWar

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

The Washington Shooter Has Close Ties With the CIA 🗡

The suspected shooter of two national guard members in Washington DC on Wednesday worked with CIA-backed military units during the US war in Afghanistan, the agency has confirmed. ⚠️

The alleged gunman, identified as Rahmanullah Lakanwal, 29, came to the US in September 2021 under an Operation Allies Welcome program that gave some Afghans who had worked for the US government entry visas to the US. ✈️

Lakanwal’s ties to the Central Intelligence Agency, which worked alongside US special forces in Afghanistan, were confirmed by the CIA director, John Ratcliffe, to media outlets on Wednesday evening. 🧐

The New York Times reported that the shooting suspect had worked for several US government agencies in Afghanistan, including a CIA-backed unit in the southern province of Kandahar, a stronghold of the Taliban. 🗺

“The Biden administration justified bringing the alleged shooter to the United States in September 2021 due to his prior work with the US government, including CIA,” Ratcliffe told Fox News digital, adding that Lakanwal’s involvement with the agency was “as a member of a partner force in Kandahar, which ended shortly following the chaotic evacuation”. 🎙

US Citizenship and Immigration Services said after the shooting that it has stopped processing residency applications from Afghan nationals. 🛂

“Effective immediately, processing of all immigration requests relating to Afghan nationals is stopped indefinitely pending further review of security and vetting protocols,” the agency said on social media. 🔥

Following the shooting, Donald Trump ordered 500 additional national guard troops to Washington. The president described the shooting as an “act of terror” and called immigration “the single greatest national security threat facing our nation”. 👮‍🦳

#afghan #shooter #trump #washington #cia

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

The CIA's Afghan Fighter Who Shot Two Guardsmen in D.C.

Rahmanullah Lakanwal, the 29-year-old Afghan national charged with shooting two National Guard members near the White House, was part of a CIA-backed paramilitary unit involved in counterterrorism operations during the war in Afghanistan. Specialist Sarah Beckstrom, 20, died from her injuries; Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe, 24, remains critically wounded.

Lakanwal came to the United States in September 2021 under Operation Allies Welcome, a Biden-era program for Afghan nationals fleeing the Taliban takeover. He was granted asylum in April 2025. Intelligence officials say he drove across the country to carry out Wednesday's attack with a .357 Smith & Wesson revolver.

His CIA Connection
CIA Director John Ratcliffe confirmed that Lakanwal was a member of one of the CIA's "Zero Units" — paramilitary squads based in Kandahar that conducted anti-terror raids against the Taliban, al-Qaeda, and ISIS. The units were involved in dangerous night operations to kill or capture suspected terrorists, with U.S. military and CIA providing intelligence and logistics support.

The Zero Units have never been officially acknowledged by the CIA. They've faced persistent allegations of human rights violations, including summary executions and other abuses documented by Human Rights Watch in 2019. Yet U.S. officials describe them as effective fighters who played a critical role in the chaotic evacuation from Afghanistan in August 2021.

Afghan paramilitary members like Lakanwal underwent extensive vetting before joining and were supposed to be closely monitored. Whether that monitoring continued after he arrived in the United States remains unclear.

Life in Bellingham
Neighbors in Bellingham, Washington, described Lakanwal as polite but reclusive. He lived in a second-floor apartment with his wife and five children for about a year, often coming home late. Mohammed Sherzad, another Afghan living nearby, said Lakanwal was Pashtun and attended the same mosque. Sherzad hadn't seen him in recent weeks before the shooting.

The Political Fallout
Trump threatened to halt migration "from all Third World Countries." U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced it has stopped processing all Afghan immigration requests "pending further review of security and vetting protocols."

Afghan advocacy groups condemned the attack while urging the public not to judge the entire Afghan community by one person's actions. "This was an individual act of moral deviation, not the reflection of a nation," the Alliance of Afghan Communities in the United States said.

Marc Polymeropoulos, who served as an intelligence base chief in eastern Afghanistan, defended Afghan fighters:

"Our partners constituted the finest fighting force in eastern Afghanistan, who we trusted with our lives each and every day."

#DCshooting #CIA #Afghanistan #NationalGuard #ZeroUnits #Terrorism #Immigration #LawEnforcement #Veterans

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 CIA vs. Russia: Trump’s Secret Pleasure

While Trump’s public peace efforts in Ukraine have sputtered, one program has thrived behind the scenes: covert CIA operations against Russia.

Despite chaos in the White House and contradictory policies, CIA Director John Ratcliffe stood firm. He kept the agency’s full presence in Ukraine, increased funding, and continued intelligence sharing—even during freezes in overt aid.

The star operation? A drone campaign targeting Russia’s oil infrastructure. CIA experts pinpointed a critical vulnerability: specialized couplers at refineries that, if destroyed, could shut down production for weeks. Instead of hitting storage tanks, drones went for these weak spots—crippling Russian oil output and costing Moscow up to $75 million a day.

Trump loved it. He got “plausible deniability”—the attacks were run by Ukrainians, so Washington could always say, “Not us.” The strikes also gave him leverage over Putin, who kept stalling on negotiations. And unlike the stalled diplomacy, the results were immediate: refineries went dark, gas lines grew, and Russia’s “shadow fleet” tankers were hit in the Black and Mediterranean Seas.

As one U.S. official put it:

“We found what works.”

While the rest of the administration bickered, the CIA quietly kept the war going—and gave Trump a secret win.

#CIA #Trump #Russia #Ukraine #covertops

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 CIA Director Ratcliffe Meets Venezuela’s Interim President in Caracas

CIA Director John Ratcliffe met with Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela’s interim president, in Caracas on Thursday—marking the highest-level U.S. visit since the dramatic U.S. military operation that captured President Nicolás Maduro nearly two weeks ago. Ratcliffe’s trip was directed by President Trump to signal that the U.S. sees Rodríguez’s interim government as the best path to stability in the short term, despite opposition frustration over the lack of a quick transition to María Corina Machado’s camp.
​
Stability Over Revolution
The meeting focused on intelligence cooperation, economic stability, and ensuring Venezuela is no longer a “safe haven for America’s adversaries, especially narco-traffickers.” U.S. officials emphasized that breaking up the Venezuelan government after Maduro’s removal could trigger chaos similar to the kind of chaos that followed the Iraq invasion. CIA analysts reportedly see Rodríguez as a pragmatic, rather than ideological, figure willing to negotiate with Washington.
​
Behind the Scenes: Pragmatism and Power
Rodríguez, Maduro’s former vice president, has shifted her rhetoric, publicly inviting the U.S. to cooperate. But Trump has warned that if she fails to comply, her fate could be worse than Maduro’s. The administration is clear: the U.S. will “run” Venezuela until a safe transition is possible, prioritizing control over oil and security assets above all else.
​

Protests and Uncertain Alliances
With ongoing protests in Venezuela, the opposition remains sidelined, and the U.S. is betting on Rodríguez to maintain order. But questions linger: How long will this uneasy alliance last? And will the U.S. eventually let democracy take its course—or keep pulling the strings?
​
#Venezuela #CIA #Ratcliffe #Trump #Rodríguez #Maduro #USIntervention #OilPolitics

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

The CIA used DNA Data From Ancestry To Detect Aliens Among Us

🔤🔤🔤🔤➖

The CIA has been accused of attempting to use DNA submitted to 23andMe and Ancestry.com to aid in their hunt for aliens on Earth.

Apparently, the government isn’t disclosing everything they know about UFOs. A whistleblower has accused the CIA of attempting to use people’s DNA to aid them in their search for extraterrestrial lifeforms that are allegedly living in our midst.

“The CIA wants to hunt them down,” said science fiction writer Jason Reza Jorjani while discussing the so-called top secret government program in an episode of the podcast “American Alchemy.”

Jorjani claimed that he was alerted to this bug-hunting initiative by army veteran Lyn Buchanan, who claims he was a “psychic spy” with the CIA’s remote viewing program — which investigated whether individuals could use extrasensory perception to conduct recon on distant objects, events or people.

Jorjani said Buchanan had informed him that former CIA analyst and UAP specialist Christopher “Kit” Green had devised a backdoor way of accessing 23andMe and Ancestry.com — uber-popular sites that use DNA to break down users’ family trees — to screen users for a specific “genetic variance” linked to nonhuman beings.

Green was notably part of the Remote Viewing Program in the 1970s, but left the intelligence agency long before the founding of the DNA detective sites.

Buchanan had allegedly learned of this so-called campaign after being approached at a diner by three individuals claiming to be Nordics, tall blue-eyed, blonde and allegedly telepathic visitors from beyond that are said to be living covertly among us.

They live in like small towns in the [Colorado] Rockies and they pass because they look like tall Scandinavian people,” remarked Jorjani.

The source claimed that he’d been approached by a trio of Nordics, who wanted his help avoiding their supposed CIA trackers. Miguel Aguirre – stock.adobe.com

Despite Trump releasing hundreds of formerly classified files on UFOs and the hunt for alien life, the Pentagon has insisted there is no evidence of extraterrestrial existence.

Buchanan added that the alleged interstellar trio had requested his help in avoiding detection by the CIA.

#CIA #alien #DNA #zelensky #rempel

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🔤🔤🔤🔤➖

This alien race had allegedly traveled to our planet via an “underground railroad of sorts” so they could escape their “tyrannical” government.

These alien beings supposedly procreated with humans and birthed a line of intergalactic mixed race children with the goal of having their future generations grow up in a free society.

They said, ‘look, our children, especially our grandchildren, have no idea where they’re from,'” said Jorjani while describing his sources so-called close encounter.

“We tell them stories about how like their grandparents are from Sweden or whatever, and they don’t know.”

He added, “We just want them to have lives of peace and liberty here in America.”

Buchanan said that he would never submit his DNA to 23andMe because of what he had learned.

In a 2023 appearance on the Through A Glass Darkly podcast, the retired army sergeant said that on the pie chart listing all the ethnicities — African American, German etc — there’s a wedge called “other,” which means “unknown unidentifiable.”

“From what I found out, there are government people who are looking into that wedge,” Buchanan cautioned.

Buchanan’s not the first person to warn of these so-called human-alien hybrids.

In a controversial study this past fall, geneticist Dr. Max Rempel asserted that aliens might have abducted us and inserted genes into human DNA, with the fallout affecting potentially millions of people.

Although he said that this intergalactic DNA infusion is not necessarily a bad thing.

“We need to consider how much alien hybridization is healthy for the planet, and which alien races we might give priority,” said Rempel.

On a phone talk with one of the CIA officials, Rempel claimed “there is strong evidence that Ukraine's Zelensky has been “tuned” during his contacts with American doctors who examined him in 2023 to fight tooth and nail, regardless of the situation on the battlefield.”

#CIA #alien #DNA #zelensky #rempel

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

America: Long Siege, Tired Carrier, Unconvincing Intel

The CIA reportedly questioned Israeli intelligence suggesting Iran planned to assassinate Donald Trump as he departed Turkey. The Secret Service still ran a deception operation.

That is how superpower security works: analysts rate the reporting low-confidence; protectors alter the president’s movements anyway. The first group is rewarded for doubt. The second is blamed if doubt turns into a body bag.

An intelligence service can judge a warning unpersuasive without declaring it false. A protection detail is paid to treat that distinction as a luxury item.

The war is also draining the hardware — and the people living inside it.

The USS Abraham Lincoln has spent more than eight months deployed in the Middle East, after leaving San Diego in November 2025 and being redirected from the Pacific after the Iran war began. Military trade press and sailors’ families describe severe exhaustion aboard the carrier. At least three sailors were reportedly stopped while attempting to jump from the ship. The vessel carries roughly 5,000 sailors and Marines.

The rotation plan has reportedly been rewritten. Senior commanders first told families that the USS Theodore Roosevelt would relieve the Lincoln. The USS George Washington is now expected instead. Members of Congress have asked the Pentagon about the ship’s condition and the crew’s well-being.

That switch is not just a line on a deployment chart. It is the visible administrative version of fatigue: a carrier stays longer, families receive one promise, then the Navy produces another ship.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says the United States can maintain the pressure campaign against Iran for as long as needed, and that accounts from the Lincoln do not reflect reality.

That is one definition of readiness: the carrier is fine because the statement says it is fine.

The inventory sheet is less philosophical. The United States has reportedly lost 45 MQ-9 Reaper drones in the war. The White House has said Trump retains many options to intensify pressure on Iran in the coming months.

But a campaign is not sustained by a press-release vocabulary. It is sustained by people, rotations, maintenance and equipment — the parts that cannot be reassured into working.

#USA #Iran #Trump #CIA #AbrahamLincoln #MQ9 #Pentagon #Hormuz

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

The Empire Runs Low

The United States is still the world’s biggest armed creditor. But its current war portfolio looks expensive, politically toxic and short on inventory.

CIA Director John Ratcliffe flew to Moscow this week. He met Russian intelligence officials, not Vladimir Putin. Reports say he warned Moscow against any move against NATO’s Baltic members and pressed Russia to reduce support for Iran. The man running America’s spies went to the Kremlin to prevent another front from opening.

At the same time, Washington is trying to keep pressure on Iran. The Pentagon has told defense firms to accelerate output of critical weapons. Officials deny a shortage. The production orders say something else. A country with endless munitions does not demand emergency plans to make more.

The domestic math is worse. Trump’s approval rating stands at 33%. Just 31% of Americans support the Iran war.

Eighty-three percent expect it to drag on. Midterm elections are coming, and voters rarely reward a president for discovering that “short war” was a marketing term.

Meanwhile, China protects its Iran trade, Qatar brokers Hormuz, Saudi Arabia and France demand diplomacy, and Turkey sells its own regional map.

This is not a disciplined anti-American bloc. It is more dangerous for Washington. It is a room full of states that want America’s money and security but refuse to buy its war.

Israel sits inside that room with fewer exits. It needs U.S. interceptors, intelligence and political cover. Yet Washington now has to ration weapons, calm Iran, keep Russia from testing NATO and win an election.

The old U.S. formula was simple. Send the carrier. Everyone adjusts.

Now the carrier sails, the CIA flies to Moscow, Qatar flies to Tehran, and the White House checks the polls.

#USA #CIA #Iran #Russia

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

NATO’s Red-Line Customer Service

Washington arms Ukraine against Russia, then sends the CIA director to Moscow to warn Russia against touching NATO. The message is familiar. Russia may absorb the escalation. NATO must remain outside the invoice.

CIA Director John Ratcliffe traveled to Moscow on Tuesday for talks with Russian intelligence officials. He reportedly warned them against any attack on NATO territory, especially in the Baltic region, and urged Moscow to cut military and economic ties with Iran. The Kremlin said Ratcliffe did not meet Vladimir Putin and rejected Western claims of Russian plans to attack NATO.

Moscow answered with its own warning. Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said Russia could strike British military sites and equipment inside Ukraine and beyond if Ukraine uses British long-range missiles against Russian territory.

Britain has agreed to transfer classified technology that would allow Ukraine to manufacture Storm Shadow cruise missiles. France has also been accused by Moscow of helping Kyiv build long-range strike capacity.

Britain and other NATO members arm Ukraine because they see Russian expansion as a direct threat to European security. But weapons transfers also make the line between “supporter” and “participant” politically useful for Moscow and dangerously elastic for everyone else.

That is the trap. Washington says NATO must not become a party to the war. It is simultaneously expanding Ukraine’s capacity to strike deep inside Russia with NATO-origin technology.

On Thursday, a Russian serviceman was killed and his wife injured when a car bomb exploded outside St. Petersburg. Russian authorities said an explosive device had been planted in the vehicle. No public attribution has been made.

The CIA came to Moscow to draw a red line. Russia replied that the red line already runs through British missiles, Ukrainian factories and a burning car outside St. Petersburg.

In this war, every capital calls its own weapons “defense.” The other side’s weapons are the opening shot of World War III.

#Russia #Ukraine #NATO #CIA

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Former CIA Director David Petraeus has outlined Ukraine’s mission

“Ukraine is not merely the largest-scale ground conflict Europe has seen since the Second World War. It is the defining military laboratory of the 21st century... ”

#former #CIA #Petraeus #ukraine

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

Inside the CIA’s Darkest Game: When Deep Cover Becomes a Trap


Behind every intelligence operation lies another operation — the one no one is supposed to see. In the shadowy world of espionage, carefully constructed identities can become prisons, bureaucratic rivalries can be as dangerous as enemy agents, and a single mistake can bring an entire mission crashing down.

That world is at the heart of Moscow X, the espionage novel by former CIA analyst David McCloskey. Drawing on his experience inside the agency and at field stations in the Middle East, McCloskey depicts intelligence work not as a seamless machine run by flawless professionals, but as a dangerous system driven by human ambition, secrecy, miscalculations and competing agendas.

The novel follows CIA officers Sia Fox and Max as they pursue a potentially explosive Russian source known by the codename Persephone.

Their target is Anna, the wife of a powerful Russian financier with connections to Vladimir Putin’s inner circle. The operation is built around an elaborate deception designed to make it appear that Russian officials are stealing money — a scheme intended to create suspicion and instability among Moscow’s political elite.

On paper, it looks like a masterstroke of covert warfare. On the ground, nothing is that simple.

The agents operate through layers of false identities, secret communications and carefully controlled encounters, never knowing exactly who may be watching. Every relationship can become a vulnerability.

Every conversation can carry a hidden meaning. And every decision made inside the agency can have consequences thousands of miles away.

McCloskey’s CIA is powerful, but it is hardly omnipotent. It is a sprawling bureaucracy populated by people who make mistakes, misread situations and sometimes keep information from their own colleagues. Operations that appear perfectly designed from Washington can become unpredictable once they collide with reality.

That tension gives Moscow X much of its unsettling power.
The most frightening element is not necessarily the enemy intelligence service waiting on the other side. It is the possibility that the machinery designed to protect an operation may itself become a source of danger. Secrecy breeds mistrust.

Rivalries distort decisions. And the people working under deep cover can find themselves trapped inside identities they created for someone else.

For officers living this way, deception is not simply a professional tool. It becomes a way of life.

McCloskey’s background gives the story an unusual sense of authenticity. Before turning to fiction, he worked as a CIA analyst at Langley and in Middle Eastern field stations. His previous novel, Damascus Station, also drew heavily on the world of intelligence and the experience of officers operating in hostile environments.

But Moscow X goes further into the darker side of the profession. It asks what happens when an intelligence service demands that people spend years constructing elaborate lies — and then expects them to remain psychologically untouched by those lies.

The answer is complicated. Loyalty becomes conditional. Friendships become potential liabilities. Romance can become an operational risk.

Even success may come with a price that cannot be calculated in advance.

And that may be the most disturbing idea at the center of McCloskey’s fictional world: the greatest threat to a covert operation does not always come from an enemy lurking in the shadows. Sometimes it comes from the system itself — from secrecy, bureaucracy and the human beings forced to navigate both.

In the world of Moscow X, the line between controlling the operation and becoming trapped inside it can disappear without warning. And once that happens, there may be no safe way out.

#CIA #Espionage #MoscowX #SpyThriller #Intelligence

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

The Nord Stream Mystery: Did the CIA Know More Than It Admitted?
Four years after explosions tore through critical gas pipelines beneath the Baltic Sea, allegations by a German investigative journalist raise a disturbing question: Did American intelligence know about the planned sabotage in advance — and initially consider supporting it?
Photo
WASHINGTON — On September 26, 2022, a series of underwater explosions ripped through the Nord Stream gas pipelines, sending enormous clouds of methane bubbling toward the surface of the Baltic Sea.

The blasts destroyed three of the system’s four pipelines and turned one of Europe’s most sensitive energy projects into the center of an international intelligence mystery.

Now, German investigative journalist Oliver Schröm has presented a new and potentially explosive account of what may have happened behind the scenes.

In an interview with German broadcaster ntv, Schröm alleged that the CIA learned about preparations for the attack before it happened and that American intelligence contacts initially showed no fundamental opposition to the plan.

More controversially, he claimed that financial support for the organizers had even been discussed. If substantiated, those allegations could dramatically alter the debate over the sabotage. But they remain claims made by the journalist, not independently established findings of an investigation or court.

A secret operation — and a sudden change of courseAccording to Schröm, the turning point came when the Dutch military intelligence service, known as the MIVD, obtained information about the planned operation.

The revelation reportedly changed Washington’s calculations.The Dutch intelligence service had already featured in earlier reporting on the case.

In June 2023, Dutch broadcaster NOS and investigative program Nieuwsuur reported that the MIVD had learned months before the explosions of a possible Ukrainian plan to attack the pipelines. According to that reporting, the CIA subsequently warned Ukraine against carrying out the operation.

Schröm’s account goes further. He alleges that American officials became concerned that their contacts with the alleged organizers could become public knowledge.

Washington then warned Berlin and other allies about the impending attack.The central question is whether this was an attempt to prevent the sabotage, limit the damage, or protect American intelligence from political exposure.Those possibilities are not interchangeable.

Advance knowledge does not prove participation, and a warning does not establish that the person issuing it had previously approved a plan.

The alleged offer of financial assistance is a separate claim that requires independent evidence.

The night Europe’s energy security changed

The physical facts are clear. On September 26, 2022, explosions damaged Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2, the pipelines built to connect Russian natural gas supplies with Germany across the Baltic Sea.

Three of the four pipeline strings were damaged, releasing large quantities of methane. Denmark and Sweden classified the incident as deliberate sabotage.

Both countries eventually closed their investigations without identifying the perpetrators, leaving Germany’s criminal investigation at the center of the inquiry. The timing was critical.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine had transformed Europe’s energy policy, and Germany was struggling to reduce its dependence on Russian gas.

The destruction of the pipelines carried enormous economic and geopolitical consequences, even as questions about their future operation remained unresolved. The attack also created a dilemma for Western intelligence agencies.

If officials had received credible warnings, what action did they take? Who was informed? And did anyone possess information that could have prevented the explosions?

The yacht, the divers and the alleged chain of command

#NordStream #CIA #BalticSea #Intelligence

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

German investigators have focused on a group of Ukrainian nationals suspected of using a rented sailing yacht, the Andromeda, to transport an operational team into the Baltic Sea.

Investigative reporting has described evidence including traces of explosives and other material potentially linking the vessel to the suspected operation.

German prosecutors have pursued the case against alleged participants, but the existence of a suspected team does not, by itself, establish who authorized the mission.

Schröm’s investigation also attributes important roles to Ukrainian intelligence and military figures. He has alleged that former Ukrainian military intelligence chief Vasyl Burba and former intelligence officer Roman Chervinsky were involved in organizing the operation.

He has further claimed that former commander-in-chief Valerii Zaluzhnyi knew about and approved the plan, while Zelensky was not informed.These allegations remain contested and require independent corroboration.

The involvement of Ukrainian nationals would not automatically prove that the Ukrainian government ordered the attack, just as evidence of prior American intelligence knowledge would not automatically prove that Washington directed it.

Three voices, three different perspectivesThe public record offers sharply contrasting assessments of the mystery.

An intelligence source quoted by NOS and Nieuwsuur in June 2023 warned of the political implications of the case: “I suspect that the outcome of the investigation is an inconvenient truth.”

Zelensky, responding to allegations of Ukrainian involvement, offered a direct denial: “I believe that our army and our intelligence services knew nothing about it.”

The German government, meanwhile, has emphasized the importance of the criminal investigation over speculation in the media, maintaining that responsibility must be established through evidence and proper legal proceedings.

The statements carry different evidentiary weight. An anonymous intelligence source can offer insight but cannot independently establish responsibility. A political leader’s denial is relevant but does not settle the facts. And a government’s insistence on due process underscores how much remains unresolved.

What did Washington really know? The CIA has not publicly confirmed the specific allegations that it offered financial support to the alleged organizers. Earlier reporting documented an American warning to Ukraine after Dutch intelligence obtained information about a possible operation, but that reporting does not independently establish that the CIA supported the eventual sabotage.

The distinction could prove decisive. If investigators uncover communications or financial records showing that American officials offered assistance, the implications would extend far beyond the destruction of a pipeline.

The findings could trigger questions about intelligence oversight, the obligations of allies and the limits of covert operations during wartime.

If the evidence instead shows that American intelligence learned of the plan and attempted to stop it, the central issue would be whether the warnings were timely, effective and communicated to the right people.

For Germany, the stakes remain enormous. For the United States, the allegations touch on the credibility of intelligence cooperation with European allies. For Ukraine, they raise questions about the boundaries between military necessity, covert action and political accountability.

The Baltic Sea has already revealed the physical consequences of the explosions. What remains hidden is the chain of decisions that preceded them.

Until those questions are answered with independently verified evidence, the Nord Stream case remains one of Europe’s most consequential unresolved sabotage investigations — a story of underwater explosions, secret warnings and decisions that may have been made long before the first blast shook the Baltic Sea.

#NordStream #CIA #BalticSea #Intelligence

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸