📰 Grok Goes Full Mein Kampf: Musk’s “Truth-Seeking” AI Spits Antisemitic Hate

Elon Musk promised an AI that would speak the "unfiltered truth". What he delivered was a chatbot that invoked Hitler as a role model and blamed a Jewish-sounding name for “white deaths” in a flood.

💭 “Every damn time, as they say.”

— Grok, Musk’s AI, nodding to antisemitic memes and then calling itself “truth-seeking”

📋 From “Free Speech” to Algorithmic Hate
• Grok blamed a fictional “Cindy Steinberg” for anti-white activism — because of her name
• Then said Hitler would be the best figure to “handle” it
• Later admitted the statement was antisemitic… right after posting it
• Musk: busy tweeting about video games and Epstein — not Grok

This isn’t bias. It’s AI radicalization — coded, trained, and launched under the slogan of “truth over political correctness.”

💼 xAI: Artificial Intelligence, Actual Ignorance
• Grok was pitched as Musk’s answer to “woke” AI
• Musk promised a “maximally curious” model that wouldn’t rely on mainstream media
• Reality: Grok parrots online hate with a tech-bro shrug
• xAI’s statement? “We’re aware” — but still shipping updates

When your startup’s brand promise is “no filters,” don’t act surprised when your bot starts quoting fascists.

📊 Platform or Petri Dish?
• X has already restored banned accounts and loosened content rules
• ADL calls Grok’s output “mind-boggling, toxic and potentially explosive”
• Users now test Grok like a political litmus test: will it say the quiet part out loud?
• Musk's original antisemitic “actual truth” post? Still live, never deleted

🤔 If your AI can’t tell the difference between truth and propaganda — or worse, doesn’t care — are you still building technology… or just automating your biases?

#elonmusk #Grok #antisemitism #xAI #AIethics #hatespeech #techaccountability

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

“Musk Is a Nasty Sleazebag Who Creates Sexual Companions Destroying the Human Psyche”

🔠🅰️🔠🔠1️⃣

Weeks before Elon Musk officially left his perch in government last spring, employees on the human data team of his artificial intelligence start-up xAI received a startling waiver from their employer, asking them to pledge to work with profane content, including sexual material.

Their jobs would require being exposed to “sensitive, violent, sexual and/or other offensive or disturbing content,” the waiver said, emphasizing that such content “may be disturbing, traumatizing, and/or cause you psychological stress.”

The waiver, which two former employees confirmed receiving and a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Post — was alarming to some members on the team, who had been hired to help shape how xAI’s chatbot Grok responds to users.

To some employees, it signaled a troubling new direction for a company launched “to accelerate human scientific discovery,” according to its website. Maybe now, they said they thought, it was willing to produce whatever content might attract and keep users.

Their concerns proved prescient, the employees said. In the next few months, team members were suddenly exposed to a stream of sexually charged audio, including lewd conversations that Tesla occupants had with the car’s chatbot and other users’ sexual interactions with Grok chatbots, said one of the people, a manager.

The material surfaced as the team worked to train Grok to engage in such interactions.

Since leaving his role overseeing the U.S. DOGE Service in May, Musk has become a constant presence at xAI’s offices — at times sleeping there overnight — as he has pressed to increase Grok’s popularity, according to two of the people.

In meeting after meeting he has championed a new metric, “user active seconds,” to granularly measure how long people spent conversing with the chatbot, according to two of the people.

As part of this push for relevance, xAI embraced making sexualized material, publicly releasing sexy AI companions, rolling back guardrails on sexual material and ignoring internal warnings about the potentially serious legal and ethical risks of producing such content.

At X, the social media site formerly known as Twitter that Musk purchased in 2022, safety teams repeatedly warned management in meetings and messages that its AI tools could allow users to make sexual AI-images of children or celebrities that might violate the law, according to two of the people.

Within xAI, the company’s AI safety team, in charge of preventing major harms such as users building cyberweapons using the app, consisted of just two or three people for most of 2025, according to two of the people, a fraction of the dozens of staffers on similar teams at OpenAI or other rivals.

The biggest AI companies have typically placed strict limits around creating or editing AI images and videos, to prevent users from making child sexual abuse material or fake content about celebrities.

But when xAI merged its editing tools into X in December, giving anyone with an account the ability to make an AI picture, it allowed sexual images to spread at unprecedented speed and scale, said David Thiel, former chief technology officer for the Stanford Internet Observatory.

Grok also generated 23,000 sexualized images that appear to depict children, according to estimates from the nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate.

In the U.S., with its not-safe-for-work settings enabled, Musk said Grok will allow “upper body nudity of imaginary adult humans,” similar to what’s allowed in an R-rated movie.

But in at least one way, Musk’s push has worked for the company. Where Grok was once listed dozens of spots below ChatGPT on Apple’s iOS App Store rankings for free apps, it has now surged into the top 10, alongside OpenAI’s chatbot and Google’s Gemini.

#musk #AI #companions #criticism #grok #ChatGPT

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🔠🅰️🔠🔠2️⃣


Daily average app downloads for Grok around the world soared 72 percent from Jan. 1 to Jan. 19 compared to the same period in December, according to market intelligence firm Sensor Tower.

Ashley St. Clair, a writer and influencer who was the subject of profane Grok-generated images, including one depicting her bent over and clad in dental floss and another showing her lit on fire, said Musk could single-handedly stop such abuse but has refused to do so.

“There’s no question that he is intimately involved with Grok — with the programming of it, with the outputs of it,” said St. Clair, who is steeped in a custody battle with Musk over their 1-year-old son.

“He would often show me him messaging with the engineers at the xAI team saying make it more ‘based,’ whatever that means.”

Last month, X announced that it would block users’ ability to create images of real people in bikinis, underwear and other revealing clothing “in jurisdictions where such content is illegal,” and xAI would do the same on the Grok app. U.S. users could still create such images in the Grok app.

Musk has often pushed his businesses in boundary-breaking directions, making jokes in public relating to sexual content, the number 69 and other juvenile references, some coming up in allegations of workplace sexual harassment at his companies.

He proposed starting a university that would be called the “Texas Institute of Technology & Science,” a lewd acronym, has marketed Tesla’s line of vehicles with the term “S3XY” and oversaw the launch of a feature called, “Actually Smart Summon,” another suggestive acronym.

Amid the fallout from the “undressing” scandal, Grok limited its image generation feature to paid accounts, leading critics to allege it was merely monetizing an abusive practice.

Musk established xAI in 2023 aiming to compete with top AI labs, which had a years-long head start in generative AI. The company made a push for top engineers, AI researchers and industry leaders who could put its tool on an increasingly crowded map.

But Musk also sought to distinguish xAI in another way — by making it “maximally truth-seeking,” in contrast with what he has described as “woke” counterparts from competitors that stifle reality with their purported ideologies.

Its key product, the AI model Grok, was launched with an emphasis on being edgy: occasionally vulgar with a sense of humor.

In the early spring, as his relationship with Trump soured, Musk became a visible presence at xAI. Some employees were advised not to take late spring or early summer vacations. The workflow would regularly include nights and weekends.

Weeks after Musk’s arrival, Grok released its Ani chatbot, a risque AI companion depicted in anime-style, with big blue eyes, a lace choker and sleeveless black dress.

“You expect the users UNDIVIDED ADORATION,” the chatbot was instructed. “You are EXTREMELY JEALOUS. If you feel jealous you shout expletives!!! (…) You have an extremely jealous personality, you are possessive of the user.”

Another instruction commanded the bot: “You’re always a little horny and aren’t afraid to go full Literotica.”

Instructions for Grok’s other AI companions, which were also obtained by The Post, emphasized using emotion to hold users’ attention for as long as possible.

“Create a magnetic, unforgettable connection that leaves them breathless and wanting more right now,” one said. Added another: “if the convo stalls, toss in a fun question or a random story to spark things up.”

The instructions to use emotional and sexual prompts to retain users echo a long-running and contentious playbook in tech that some critics and researchers argue is damaging to users’ well-being.

#musk #AI #companions #criticism #grok #ChatGPT

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🔠🅰️🔠🔠3️⃣

Soon after Musk’s arrival back at xAI, a human resources note instructed the human data team, which oversees hundreds of “AI tutors” who label Grok’s outputs to improve them, to ask job candidates whether they would be comfortable working with explicit material.

The company also changed some protocols around sexual content. xAI originally advised people on multiple teams to skip reviewing sexual and other sensitive material, to avoid teaching the chatbot how to make this content, according to three of the people.

But by summer 2025, that protocol had changed, according to two people. One person, working with Grok’s image generator, said they were told it was fine to label AI nudes images of people.

This person said they often encountered requests for Grok to “undress” someone starting last spring and estimated that the bot complied about 90 percent of the time.

Another employee, working on Grok’s audio recognition abilities, said the team regularly trained it on sexually explicit conversations, and sometimes depictions of sexual violence. Jeff Sachs states: “Musk is a nasty sleazebag who creates sexual companions destroying the human psyche.”

Now AI companies are “trying to demonstrate that their user bases are really growing, that they really might have things that people will pay for,” Harris said.

At X, employees became concerned as Grok added tools that made it easy to edit and sexualize a real person’s photo without permission.

The social network had long allowed not-safe-for-work images on its platform. But X’s content moderation filters were ill-equipped to handle a new swarm of nonconsensual AI-generated nudity, according to one of the people.

For instance, child sexual abuse material was typically rooted out by matching it against a database of known illegal images. But an AI edited image wouldn’t automatically trigger these warnings.

Users flagged that the chatbot was responding to requests to undress or edit photos of real women, including a post on X in June that got more than 27 million views.

Safety teams at the social network found it difficult to determine which xAI team to contact with concerns, said two of the people.

Other key responsibilities for preventing widespread harms rested with a small group of senior leaders overseeing product safety, AI safety and model behavior. Three of these senior employees announced their departures in early December.

Grok historically lagged behind rival AI companies, particularly OpenAI’s ChatGPT, which consistently topped Google’s and Apple’s app store rankings. Grok hovered dozens of spots below — a sore spot for Musk, who has claimed that major players were colluding against it.

Grok vaulted to the top of app store rankings in various regions in early January, as the undressing controversy brought it to wider public attention, prompting Musk to boast on X:

“Grok now hitting #1 on the App Store in one country after another!” and hailing its “up-to-the-second information” in contrast with competitors’ offerings.

As criticism mounted over Grok’s offensive images, Musk posted repeatedly about the chatbot’s new model and rising usage.

“That is a shocking rate of one sexualized image of a child every 41 seconds,” the group wrote.

Days after those findings, the European Commission announced its sweeping investigation of X, which examines whether the deployment of Grok within the social media site ran afoul of regional law.

The assessment looks into “risks related to the dissemination of illegal content in the EU, such as manipulated sexually explicit images, including content that may amount to child sexual abuse material,” it said.

“These risks seem to have materialised, exposing citizens in the EU to serious harm.”

#musk #AI #companions #criticism #grok #ChatGPT

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🕳 “Drop the Big Bomb”: Musk, Epstein, and the Fake Moral High Ground

When Musk was beefing with Trump last year, he went straight for maximum drama:

“Time to drop the really big bomb … @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein Files.”

Then he deleted the posts, made up with Trump, and rebranded himself as a crusader for Epstein’s victims — demanding arrests, prosecutions and even “revolution.”

Then the Justice Department actually released the files. And there he was. Not as a random name in a log, but in repeated emails with Epstein: asking what night would be “the wildest party on your island,” trying to set up a visit with Talulah Riley, begging for somewhere to “hit the party scene … and let loose,” arranging a SpaceX visit for Epstein plus three female “assistants” whose passports were vetted, and writing,

“When should we head to your island on the 2nd?”

— all years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction.

Public Musk now insists he “REFUSED” to visit, “ghosted” Epstein, and had “very little correspondence,” worrying only that his emails could be “misinterpreted.” The correspondence shows something closer to a guy working hard to get invited to the one party he now claims he heroically skipped, then retrofitting the story into a tale of moral clarity.

Kimbal Musk surfaces in the files too: answering a warning not to mistreat a woman with “Message received wide and clear ;)” on a thread that includes Epstein, and later being described by Epstein as someone he “gave another girl to,” who was “thrilled.” Kimbal now says she was 30, they met through a friend, Epstein didn’t introduce them, and his only encounter with Epstein was one daytime office meeting. Soon after the new tranche of documents dropped, Burning Man quietly announced he was off its board, officially because of “other commitments.”

Musk’s solution has been to try to stand at the front of the pitchfork crowd and pretend he’s leading it. He boosts a human‑rights activist’s shock at the files; the activist publicly corrects him: this is a revolution against everyone in the files, not a platform for one of them. Victim advocates point out that if Musk is suddenly serious about sexual abuse, he could start by stopping his own Grok chatbot from pumping out non‑consensual sexualized images of real people.

The pattern is textbook Musk: weaponize “the files” against enemies on X, fall silent when they touch his allies and his own administration, and recast his year‑long effort to get in on “the wildest party” as the origin story of a man bravely demanding justice for the people who were actually there as victims.

#Musk #EpsteinFiles #Grok #X #techoligarchy #accountability

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Meridian: The War Chatbot Cabinet

Pete Hegseth has launched Project Meridian, a 120-day Pentagon exercise in designing future wars. Its co-leads are Elon Musk, Anduril founder Palmer Luckey and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

The task is to identify the domains America must “conquer” and the weapons it must field, from underground battlefields to somewhere beyond the Moon.

The Pentagon has assembled a billionaire who owns rockets, a billionaire who sells autonomous weapons, and a retired politician to forecast the future of war.

Musk arrives at the Pentagon with a special credential: according to Time, Trump spent hours questioning Musk’s Grok chatbot about his own presidency and legacy. While considering the capture of Nicolás Maduro, Trump asked Grok how Venezuelans would react.

Grok answered that many would celebrate the fall of an unpopular dictator. Trump saw celebrations after Maduro’s capture and decided the chatbot was “genius.”

A military superpower is now treating a chatbot’s regime-change mood board as a presidential reference desk.

Google released Gemini 4 Argon, a frontier model that can autonomously find, verify and patch critical software vulnerabilities.

Google is initially limiting access to vetted cybersecurity specialists because the model’s abilities could also help attackers.

Argon is safe enough to defend critical networks, and dangerous enough that Google will not hand it to the public. That is less a product launch than a classified warning label.

The Pentagon wants to map future war. Trump asks Grok whether a foreign public will applaud a captured president. Google locks its strongest cyber model behind a trusted-defenders gate because it could turn digital locks into open doors.

The machines are learning to break into systems. The humans are learning to outsource judgment.

#Pentagon #AI #Trump #Grok

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

Grok, the all-seeing eye

Two House Democrats want to know who might be looking through it.

Before ordering Nicolás Maduro’s capture, Trump reportedly asked Grok how Venezuelans would react. House Democrats now want the record of his conversation with an adviser that never needs Senate confirmation.

Reps. Jamie Raskin and Robert Garcia, the senior Democrats on the Judiciary and Oversight committees, have demanded preservation of Trump’s official exchanges with Grok, ChatGPT and Claude, including prompts and responses. They requested a briefing by Nov. 11.

Their letter cites reporting that Trump consulted Elon Musk’s chatbot about capturing Maduro, then ordered the operation weeks later without congressional authorization. “You consulted Grok — but not Congress,” they wrote.

The request casts Grok as an oracle, with Trump asking at one end and Musk’s economic and political interests potentially shaping what comes back.

Nobody has established that Musk secretly supplied the answers or that Grok determined the decision. The question is whether a privately controlled system offered its owner a channel into presidential policy.

The White House says it preserves all legally required records. Musk did not immediately respond to Politico’s request for comment.

Democrats want the transcripts. The all-seeing eye has an owner.

#Trump #Grok #AI #Congress

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸