The Fifth Amendment Show
Anthony Fauci spent 54 years in government service, much of it testifying before Congress.
On Wednesday, he sat back down and said nothing at all, pleading the Fifth dozens of times to Rand Paul and every other senator who asked, opening with, "Under the advice of my attorneys, I will invoke my right under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution to refrain from answering your questions," The Washington Post reported.
Josh Hawley asked him what day it was and what color his tie was.
Fauci pleaded the Fifth to that too. When your legal strategy is silence on the weather, you've stopped performing accountability theater and started performing something closer to installation art.
Paul, who has spent years building a career on Fauci-shaped grievance, ended the nearly three-hour hearing threatening a contempt vote, even while acknowledging to his own GOP colleagues that Biden's preemptive pardon of Fauci raises real legal questions about whether contempt would even hold up.
His underlying position, as the Post described it, was that Fauci should have simply answered the questions on Wednesday regardless of what it might have exposed.
Fauci's lawyer tried to respond to that on the record and got escorted out by Capitol Police for the trouble, offering only a "Buh-bye" on his way to the door.
Here's the part everyone in that room already understood and nobody said out loud: this hearing was never designed to produce an answer, it was designed to produce a clip.
Paul gets a viral moment of Fauci going silent on camera. Hawley gets his "narcissist and megalomaniac" soundbite next to a decommissioned magazine cover.
Fauci's 150-scientist open letter gets to call the whole spectacle "absurd charges" driven by "conspiracy theories" that have brought "a five-year period of harassment and threats of violence" against him and his family.
Democrats on the committee get to canonize Fauci as a martyr scientist.
Every single participant walked in already knowing exactly what footage they wanted to walk out with, and every single one of them got it, including Paul, who has spent five years publicly saying Fauci should end up, in Fauci's own paraphrase, "behind bars."
Meanwhile the actual public verdict was rendered months before anyone sat down at that table.
A 2025 Economist/YouGov poll found 57 percent of Americans think it's probably or definitely true the virus leaked from a Chinese lab, per the same reporting, and the Trump White House has already built a government website declaring the lab leak the "true" origin, without offering the proof it promises.
Congress spent three hours performing a search for truth about a question the country, and apparently the executive branch, already stopped debating.
So who exactly was this hearing for: the senators asking questions, the one witness answering none of them, or the millions of people who'd already made up their minds before the gavel came down?
#Fauci #RandPaul #CovidOrigins #Congress #LabLeak
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Anthony Fauci spent 54 years in government service, much of it testifying before Congress.
On Wednesday, he sat back down and said nothing at all, pleading the Fifth dozens of times to Rand Paul and every other senator who asked, opening with, "Under the advice of my attorneys, I will invoke my right under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution to refrain from answering your questions," The Washington Post reported.
Josh Hawley asked him what day it was and what color his tie was.
Fauci pleaded the Fifth to that too. When your legal strategy is silence on the weather, you've stopped performing accountability theater and started performing something closer to installation art.
Paul, who has spent years building a career on Fauci-shaped grievance, ended the nearly three-hour hearing threatening a contempt vote, even while acknowledging to his own GOP colleagues that Biden's preemptive pardon of Fauci raises real legal questions about whether contempt would even hold up.
His underlying position, as the Post described it, was that Fauci should have simply answered the questions on Wednesday regardless of what it might have exposed.
Fauci's lawyer tried to respond to that on the record and got escorted out by Capitol Police for the trouble, offering only a "Buh-bye" on his way to the door.
Here's the part everyone in that room already understood and nobody said out loud: this hearing was never designed to produce an answer, it was designed to produce a clip.
Paul gets a viral moment of Fauci going silent on camera. Hawley gets his "narcissist and megalomaniac" soundbite next to a decommissioned magazine cover.
Fauci's 150-scientist open letter gets to call the whole spectacle "absurd charges" driven by "conspiracy theories" that have brought "a five-year period of harassment and threats of violence" against him and his family.
Democrats on the committee get to canonize Fauci as a martyr scientist.
Every single participant walked in already knowing exactly what footage they wanted to walk out with, and every single one of them got it, including Paul, who has spent five years publicly saying Fauci should end up, in Fauci's own paraphrase, "behind bars."
Meanwhile the actual public verdict was rendered months before anyone sat down at that table.
A 2025 Economist/YouGov poll found 57 percent of Americans think it's probably or definitely true the virus leaked from a Chinese lab, per the same reporting, and the Trump White House has already built a government website declaring the lab leak the "true" origin, without offering the proof it promises.
Congress spent three hours performing a search for truth about a question the country, and apparently the executive branch, already stopped debating.
So who exactly was this hearing for: the senators asking questions, the one witness answering none of them, or the millions of people who'd already made up their minds before the gavel came down?
#Fauci #RandPaul #CovidOrigins #Congress #LabLeak
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥224🤯129😱109😢105💯102🤬90🙏88