🔴 From Zarif's Paradigm to Imam Khomeini's Paradigm
✍️ By Mostafa Amiri
---
✅ Zarif & "Change from Within"
▪️ Amidst the fateful war against Israel and the U.S., Javad Zarif reemerged with the JCPOA narrative, declaring in Foreign Policy:
"It’s time for a paradigm shift. Iran must initiate change from within." [1]
▪️ Mr. Zarif: The West’s problem is with the essence of Iran’s Revolution, not necessarily its governing system.
---
✅ Sariolghalam’s Interpretation of Zarif’s Paradigm
▪️ Mahmoud Sariolghalam (key intellectual of the "moderation" current) stated after the war with Israel:
"The 12-day war against Iran was largely designed and directed by Jews in New York. Why? Because for years, Iran’s central slogan has been the destruction of Israel."
▪️ He argued Iran faces a binary choice:
- Pursue economic development (like UAE/Saudi), OR
- Devote national resources to justice in the Middle East (confronting the U.S./Israel).
"Iran cannot do both." [2]
▪️ But we ask: Do the people endure economic hardship only because they see the Revolution as a prelude to Imam Mahdi’s reappearance? [3]
▪️ Responding to Abutalebi (Rouhani’s advisor), who asked:
"Why limit foreign policy to the geography of reappearance? What about our national interests?" [4]
▪️ We replied: "Is striving for Mahdism not itself the highest national interest? A future of justice, ending oppression, transforming the world?" [5]
---
✅ Who Is Right?
▪️ From Sariolghalam’s perspective: "Israel wants Nile-to-Euphrates, not Iran. Focus on tech and economy like UAE. Why fight America?"
▪️ But from a civilizational battle perspective: Iran’s mission is broader. Support from Yemen to Beirut to Palestine is inevitable—it’s a historical confrontation.
▪️ Imam Khomeini emphasized:
"The government must strive to serve the people, but this cannot divert from the Revolution’s grand goal: establishing a global Islamic government. Abandoning this duty would be a grave betrayal." [6]
▪️ The Revolution’s ideal was laying the groundwork for Imam Mahdi’s reappearance. If reduced to mere "development," its essence is lost.
▪️ The choice is clear:
- Integrate into the New World Order, OR
- Embrace Shiite futurism (preparing for reappearance).
▪️ The people endure hardships because they see the Revolution as a transitional phase toward reappearance—and it won’t take centuries. Those who dismiss this misunderstand the meaning of "prelude."
---
✅ Footnotes:
1. [Zarif in Foreign Policy](https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/38513)
2. [Sariolghalam’s Analysis](https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/38391)
3. [People’s Resilience](https://t.me/asrzohur110/1198)
4. [Abutalebi’s Question](https://www.khabaronline.ir/news/1796414)
5. [Response on National Interests](https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/38075)
6. Imam Khomeini, Sahifeh Imam, Vol. 21, P. 327.
7. [From Candle to Sun](https://t.me/asrzohur110/1361)
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1411
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
✅ @rahyafte_en
#IranRevolution #ImamKhomeini #Mahdism #ParadigmShift #Zarif #CivilizationalBattle
✍️ By Mostafa Amiri
---
✅ Zarif & "Change from Within"
▪️ Amidst the fateful war against Israel and the U.S., Javad Zarif reemerged with the JCPOA narrative, declaring in Foreign Policy:
"It’s time for a paradigm shift. Iran must initiate change from within." [1]
▪️ Mr. Zarif: The West’s problem is with the essence of Iran’s Revolution, not necessarily its governing system.
---
✅ Sariolghalam’s Interpretation of Zarif’s Paradigm
▪️ Mahmoud Sariolghalam (key intellectual of the "moderation" current) stated after the war with Israel:
"The 12-day war against Iran was largely designed and directed by Jews in New York. Why? Because for years, Iran’s central slogan has been the destruction of Israel."
▪️ He argued Iran faces a binary choice:
- Pursue economic development (like UAE/Saudi), OR
- Devote national resources to justice in the Middle East (confronting the U.S./Israel).
"Iran cannot do both." [2]
▪️ But we ask: Do the people endure economic hardship only because they see the Revolution as a prelude to Imam Mahdi’s reappearance? [3]
▪️ Responding to Abutalebi (Rouhani’s advisor), who asked:
"Why limit foreign policy to the geography of reappearance? What about our national interests?" [4]
▪️ We replied: "Is striving for Mahdism not itself the highest national interest? A future of justice, ending oppression, transforming the world?" [5]
---
✅ Who Is Right?
▪️ From Sariolghalam’s perspective: "Israel wants Nile-to-Euphrates, not Iran. Focus on tech and economy like UAE. Why fight America?"
▪️ But from a civilizational battle perspective: Iran’s mission is broader. Support from Yemen to Beirut to Palestine is inevitable—it’s a historical confrontation.
▪️ Imam Khomeini emphasized:
"The government must strive to serve the people, but this cannot divert from the Revolution’s grand goal: establishing a global Islamic government. Abandoning this duty would be a grave betrayal." [6]
▪️ The Revolution’s ideal was laying the groundwork for Imam Mahdi’s reappearance. If reduced to mere "development," its essence is lost.
▪️ The choice is clear:
- Integrate into the New World Order, OR
- Embrace Shiite futurism (preparing for reappearance).
▪️ The people endure hardships because they see the Revolution as a transitional phase toward reappearance—and it won’t take centuries. Those who dismiss this misunderstand the meaning of "prelude."
---
✅ Footnotes:
1. [Zarif in Foreign Policy](https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/38513)
2. [Sariolghalam’s Analysis](https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/38391)
3. [People’s Resilience](https://t.me/asrzohur110/1198)
4. [Abutalebi’s Question](https://www.khabaronline.ir/news/1796414)
5. [Response on National Interests](https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/38075)
6. Imam Khomeini, Sahifeh Imam, Vol. 21, P. 327.
7. [From Candle to Sun](https://t.me/asrzohur110/1361)
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1411
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
✅ @rahyafte_en
#IranRevolution #ImamKhomeini #Mahdism #ParadigmShift #Zarif #CivilizationalBattle