🔻 He Insisted for Half an Hour, but Suddenly…
🔻 He persistently urged Imam Khomeini for half an hour to withdraw his statement! But suddenly, he put down the phone and sat in a corner of the room…
🔻 The story was that the Bakhtiar government had declared martial law from 4 PM on 21 Bahman 1357 (February 10, 1979). However, Imam Khomeini responded with a statement instructing the people not to stay at home and to disregard the martial law.
🔻 At this point, Ayatollah Taleghani argued:
"The Imam has been away from Iran for 15 years and may not fully realize how ruthless the regime’s executioners are. If people take to the streets, they will be massacred! Therefore, it is best for everyone to stay in their homes."
🔻 After Ayatollah Taleghani ended the call, those around him thought he was upset with the Imam…
🔻 But then he said:
"No, that’s not the case at all. I kept insisting, and the Imam kept responding, but I wasn’t convinced. Finally, he said: ‘Ayatollah Taleghani! Stop insisting! Consider the possibility that this order is coming from Imam Mahdi (AJ).’ As soon as the Imam said this, I trembled, involuntarily put down the phone, and felt completely shaken."
🔸 P.S. 1: It was later revealed that the regime had planned a massive massacre and a bombing at Imam Khomeini’s location on the afternoon of 21 Bahman 1357 (February 10, 1979), aiming to brutally crush the revolution. Yet, by the grace of Imam Mahdi (AJ) and the presence of the people, their final shot missed the target!
🔸 P.S. 2: If the demonstrations leading to victory were guided by the Sahib al-Zaman (AJ) himself, then wouldn’t our participation in the rallies that sustain the revolution—like the 22nd of Bahman march—also bring his blessings and approval?
📌 Source: Center for Islamic Revolution Documents
🔗 Read more
https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/32664
🔹 @rahyafte_en #IslamicRevolution #ImamKhomeini #February11 #IranRevolution #ImamMahdi #Taleghani
🔻 He persistently urged Imam Khomeini for half an hour to withdraw his statement! But suddenly, he put down the phone and sat in a corner of the room…
🔻 The story was that the Bakhtiar government had declared martial law from 4 PM on 21 Bahman 1357 (February 10, 1979). However, Imam Khomeini responded with a statement instructing the people not to stay at home and to disregard the martial law.
🔻 At this point, Ayatollah Taleghani argued:
"The Imam has been away from Iran for 15 years and may not fully realize how ruthless the regime’s executioners are. If people take to the streets, they will be massacred! Therefore, it is best for everyone to stay in their homes."
🔻 After Ayatollah Taleghani ended the call, those around him thought he was upset with the Imam…
🔻 But then he said:
"No, that’s not the case at all. I kept insisting, and the Imam kept responding, but I wasn’t convinced. Finally, he said: ‘Ayatollah Taleghani! Stop insisting! Consider the possibility that this order is coming from Imam Mahdi (AJ).’ As soon as the Imam said this, I trembled, involuntarily put down the phone, and felt completely shaken."
🔸 P.S. 1: It was later revealed that the regime had planned a massive massacre and a bombing at Imam Khomeini’s location on the afternoon of 21 Bahman 1357 (February 10, 1979), aiming to brutally crush the revolution. Yet, by the grace of Imam Mahdi (AJ) and the presence of the people, their final shot missed the target!
🔸 P.S. 2: If the demonstrations leading to victory were guided by the Sahib al-Zaman (AJ) himself, then wouldn’t our participation in the rallies that sustain the revolution—like the 22nd of Bahman march—also bring his blessings and approval?
📌 Source: Center for Islamic Revolution Documents
🔗 Read more
https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/32664
🔹 @rahyafte_en #IslamicRevolution #ImamKhomeini #February11 #IranRevolution #ImamMahdi #Taleghani
🔴 From Zarif's Paradigm to Imam Khomeini's Paradigm
✍️ By Mostafa Amiri
---
✅ Zarif & "Change from Within"
▪️ Amidst the fateful war against Israel and the U.S., Javad Zarif reemerged with the JCPOA narrative, declaring in Foreign Policy:
"It’s time for a paradigm shift. Iran must initiate change from within." [1]
▪️ Mr. Zarif: The West’s problem is with the essence of Iran’s Revolution, not necessarily its governing system.
---
✅ Sariolghalam’s Interpretation of Zarif’s Paradigm
▪️ Mahmoud Sariolghalam (key intellectual of the "moderation" current) stated after the war with Israel:
"The 12-day war against Iran was largely designed and directed by Jews in New York. Why? Because for years, Iran’s central slogan has been the destruction of Israel."
▪️ He argued Iran faces a binary choice:
- Pursue economic development (like UAE/Saudi), OR
- Devote national resources to justice in the Middle East (confronting the U.S./Israel).
"Iran cannot do both." [2]
▪️ But we ask: Do the people endure economic hardship only because they see the Revolution as a prelude to Imam Mahdi’s reappearance? [3]
▪️ Responding to Abutalebi (Rouhani’s advisor), who asked:
"Why limit foreign policy to the geography of reappearance? What about our national interests?" [4]
▪️ We replied: "Is striving for Mahdism not itself the highest national interest? A future of justice, ending oppression, transforming the world?" [5]
---
✅ Who Is Right?
▪️ From Sariolghalam’s perspective: "Israel wants Nile-to-Euphrates, not Iran. Focus on tech and economy like UAE. Why fight America?"
▪️ But from a civilizational battle perspective: Iran’s mission is broader. Support from Yemen to Beirut to Palestine is inevitable—it’s a historical confrontation.
▪️ Imam Khomeini emphasized:
"The government must strive to serve the people, but this cannot divert from the Revolution’s grand goal: establishing a global Islamic government. Abandoning this duty would be a grave betrayal." [6]
▪️ The Revolution’s ideal was laying the groundwork for Imam Mahdi’s reappearance. If reduced to mere "development," its essence is lost.
▪️ The choice is clear:
- Integrate into the New World Order, OR
- Embrace Shiite futurism (preparing for reappearance).
▪️ The people endure hardships because they see the Revolution as a transitional phase toward reappearance—and it won’t take centuries. Those who dismiss this misunderstand the meaning of "prelude."
---
✅ Footnotes:
1. [Zarif in Foreign Policy](https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/38513)
2. [Sariolghalam’s Analysis](https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/38391)
3. [People’s Resilience](https://t.me/asrzohur110/1198)
4. [Abutalebi’s Question](https://www.khabaronline.ir/news/1796414)
5. [Response on National Interests](https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/38075)
6. Imam Khomeini, Sahifeh Imam, Vol. 21, P. 327.
7. [From Candle to Sun](https://t.me/asrzohur110/1361)
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1411
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
✅ @rahyafte_en
#IranRevolution #ImamKhomeini #Mahdism #ParadigmShift #Zarif #CivilizationalBattle
✍️ By Mostafa Amiri
---
✅ Zarif & "Change from Within"
▪️ Amidst the fateful war against Israel and the U.S., Javad Zarif reemerged with the JCPOA narrative, declaring in Foreign Policy:
"It’s time for a paradigm shift. Iran must initiate change from within." [1]
▪️ Mr. Zarif: The West’s problem is with the essence of Iran’s Revolution, not necessarily its governing system.
---
✅ Sariolghalam’s Interpretation of Zarif’s Paradigm
▪️ Mahmoud Sariolghalam (key intellectual of the "moderation" current) stated after the war with Israel:
"The 12-day war against Iran was largely designed and directed by Jews in New York. Why? Because for years, Iran’s central slogan has been the destruction of Israel."
▪️ He argued Iran faces a binary choice:
- Pursue economic development (like UAE/Saudi), OR
- Devote national resources to justice in the Middle East (confronting the U.S./Israel).
"Iran cannot do both." [2]
▪️ But we ask: Do the people endure economic hardship only because they see the Revolution as a prelude to Imam Mahdi’s reappearance? [3]
▪️ Responding to Abutalebi (Rouhani’s advisor), who asked:
"Why limit foreign policy to the geography of reappearance? What about our national interests?" [4]
▪️ We replied: "Is striving for Mahdism not itself the highest national interest? A future of justice, ending oppression, transforming the world?" [5]
---
✅ Who Is Right?
▪️ From Sariolghalam’s perspective: "Israel wants Nile-to-Euphrates, not Iran. Focus on tech and economy like UAE. Why fight America?"
▪️ But from a civilizational battle perspective: Iran’s mission is broader. Support from Yemen to Beirut to Palestine is inevitable—it’s a historical confrontation.
▪️ Imam Khomeini emphasized:
"The government must strive to serve the people, but this cannot divert from the Revolution’s grand goal: establishing a global Islamic government. Abandoning this duty would be a grave betrayal." [6]
▪️ The Revolution’s ideal was laying the groundwork for Imam Mahdi’s reappearance. If reduced to mere "development," its essence is lost.
▪️ The choice is clear:
- Integrate into the New World Order, OR
- Embrace Shiite futurism (preparing for reappearance).
▪️ The people endure hardships because they see the Revolution as a transitional phase toward reappearance—and it won’t take centuries. Those who dismiss this misunderstand the meaning of "prelude."
---
✅ Footnotes:
1. [Zarif in Foreign Policy](https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/38513)
2. [Sariolghalam’s Analysis](https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/38391)
3. [People’s Resilience](https://t.me/asrzohur110/1198)
4. [Abutalebi’s Question](https://www.khabaronline.ir/news/1796414)
5. [Response on National Interests](https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/38075)
6. Imam Khomeini, Sahifeh Imam, Vol. 21, P. 327.
7. [From Candle to Sun](https://t.me/asrzohur110/1361)
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1411
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
✅ @rahyafte_en
#IranRevolution #ImamKhomeini #Mahdism #ParadigmShift #Zarif #CivilizationalBattle
Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
📆 Daily Calendar 🌺 Today: Saturday 🌞 30 August 2025 (Gregorian) ☪️ 6 Rabi‘ al-Awwal 1447 (Hijri-Qamari) ✝️ 8 Shahrivar 1404 (Hijri-Shamsi) 🕎 6 Elul 5785 (Hebrew) 🌍 Solar (Shamsi) Anniversaries ➖➖➖➖➖➖ ✍ The explosion at the Prime Minister’s Office and the…
🔍 The Hidden "Network": NATO's Secret Arm in Iran & Beyond
A Deep Dive into Covert Cold War Operations
https://jscenter.ir/slave-jews/muslim-zionism/8578
---
🌐 Origins of the "Network"
· Emerging in the post-Cold War era (1990s), the "Network" first gained notoriety in Italy as "Gladio" and in Turkey as "Ergenekon."
· It was exposed as a clandestine NATO operation behind numerous coups, bombings, and false-flag terrorist attacks across Europe, often disguised as far-left or far-right extremist groups.
· Key Example: The 1978 kidnapping and murder of Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro was initially blamed on the Marxist Red Brigades but later revealed to be a Gladio operation.
---
🕵️ Architects of the Network
· George Kennedy Young (Deputy Chief of MI6) and General Lucian Truscott (CIA Deputy in Frankfurt) established the Network in the early 1950s under NATO’s "Stay-Behind" program.
· Division of Labor:
· MI6 handled France, Belgium, Netherlands, Portugal, and Norway.
· CIA handled Sweden, Finland, and the rest of Europe.
· Young, the mastermind of the 1953 Iran coup, continued influencing global affairs through entities like Kleinwort Benson bank and ties to Royal Dutch Shell and HSBC.
---
⚔️ The Network in Iran
· Unlike Turkey (where Ergenekon was exposed early), Iran’s Network remained deeply hidden, operating with unparalleled power.
· Key figures like Young, Lord Victor Rothschild, Shapour Reporter, and Yaqub Nimrodi were stationed in Tehran during the 1979 Revolution, not to flee but to plan future operations.
· Post-revolution, the Network’s triple mission:
1. Counter Soviet expansion (classic Cold War role).
2. Subvert the Islamic Revolution and destabilize Iran.
3. Profit massively from regional chaos (e.g., the Iran-Iraq War).
---
💣 After the Cold War
· With the USSR’s collapse (1991), the Network’s anti-communist mandate ended, but its anti-Iran operations and financial exploitation intensified.
· It evolved into a powerful mafia, leveraging Iran’s geopolitical struggles for profit and influence.
---
📰 First Public Exposure in Iran
· The first article on the Network appeared in Kayhan Newspaper (January 26, 1991), authored by Abdullah Shahbazi.
· Initially, it was mistakenly assumed the Network had been "dismantled" after the Revolution—a grave underestimation.
---
🧩 Global Revelations
· Italian Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti officially acknowledged Gladio’s existence in October 1990, exposing decades of NATO-backed covert operations.
· Similar networks were uncovered across Europe, but Iran’s remained the most entrenched and least understood.
---
🔥 Conclusion
· The Network is not a relic of the past—it remains a potent force in Iran and the region, leveraging chaos for power and profit.
· Understanding its history is crucial to decoding modern geopolitical struggles.
#DeepState #NATO #Gladio #Ergenekon #ColdWar #IranRevolution #CovertOperations #MI6 #CIA
✅ @rahyafte_en
A Deep Dive into Covert Cold War Operations
https://jscenter.ir/slave-jews/muslim-zionism/8578
---
🌐 Origins of the "Network"
· Emerging in the post-Cold War era (1990s), the "Network" first gained notoriety in Italy as "Gladio" and in Turkey as "Ergenekon."
· It was exposed as a clandestine NATO operation behind numerous coups, bombings, and false-flag terrorist attacks across Europe, often disguised as far-left or far-right extremist groups.
· Key Example: The 1978 kidnapping and murder of Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro was initially blamed on the Marxist Red Brigades but later revealed to be a Gladio operation.
---
🕵️ Architects of the Network
· George Kennedy Young (Deputy Chief of MI6) and General Lucian Truscott (CIA Deputy in Frankfurt) established the Network in the early 1950s under NATO’s "Stay-Behind" program.
· Division of Labor:
· MI6 handled France, Belgium, Netherlands, Portugal, and Norway.
· CIA handled Sweden, Finland, and the rest of Europe.
· Young, the mastermind of the 1953 Iran coup, continued influencing global affairs through entities like Kleinwort Benson bank and ties to Royal Dutch Shell and HSBC.
---
⚔️ The Network in Iran
· Unlike Turkey (where Ergenekon was exposed early), Iran’s Network remained deeply hidden, operating with unparalleled power.
· Key figures like Young, Lord Victor Rothschild, Shapour Reporter, and Yaqub Nimrodi were stationed in Tehran during the 1979 Revolution, not to flee but to plan future operations.
· Post-revolution, the Network’s triple mission:
1. Counter Soviet expansion (classic Cold War role).
2. Subvert the Islamic Revolution and destabilize Iran.
3. Profit massively from regional chaos (e.g., the Iran-Iraq War).
---
💣 After the Cold War
· With the USSR’s collapse (1991), the Network’s anti-communist mandate ended, but its anti-Iran operations and financial exploitation intensified.
· It evolved into a powerful mafia, leveraging Iran’s geopolitical struggles for profit and influence.
---
📰 First Public Exposure in Iran
· The first article on the Network appeared in Kayhan Newspaper (January 26, 1991), authored by Abdullah Shahbazi.
· Initially, it was mistakenly assumed the Network had been "dismantled" after the Revolution—a grave underestimation.
---
🧩 Global Revelations
· Italian Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti officially acknowledged Gladio’s existence in October 1990, exposing decades of NATO-backed covert operations.
· Similar networks were uncovered across Europe, but Iran’s remained the most entrenched and least understood.
---
🔥 Conclusion
· The Network is not a relic of the past—it remains a potent force in Iran and the region, leveraging chaos for power and profit.
· Understanding its history is crucial to decoding modern geopolitical struggles.
#DeepState #NATO #Gladio #Ergenekon #ColdWar #IranRevolution #CovertOperations #MI6 #CIA
✅ @rahyafte_en