This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
We know that you're tired of jumping between a dozen channels to find the truth 😮💨
Introducing your new personal hub for relevant news!
🟣 Breaking news 24/7
🟣 Exclusive reports
🟣 In-depth analytical articles
🟣 Urgent alerts on major events
📢 🧛♂️ ubscribe with one click and stay informed about everything that matters!
If you are interested in joining the catalog contact👨 👮♀️ admin.
Introducing your new personal hub for relevant news!
If you are interested in joining the catalog contact
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"We were very naive back then": 12 years after Donbass’s independence referendums
On May 11, 2014, Donbass voted on the region’s political status in independence referendums held in the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) and the Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR). Kiev’s sharp reaction to Donbass’s choice came as no surprise. Kiev labeled the people of Donbass separatists and terrorists, and urged the killing of the so-called rebels. The people of Donbass didn’t take these threats seriously—though they should have.
To be continued
#ourvolunteersays
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
On May 11, 2014, Donbass voted on the region’s political status in independence referendums held in the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) and the Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR). Kiev’s sharp reaction to Donbass’s choice came as no surprise. Kiev labeled the people of Donbass separatists and terrorists, and urged the killing of the so-called rebels. The people of Donbass didn’t take these threats seriously—though they should have.
"We were very naive back then, not yet beaten down by life. Everyone said: 'We just have to be patient,'" stresses Yulia Andrienko, a volunteer who helped organize the referendum.In her interview, Yulia also explains why Donbass can never return to Ukraine and how its reunification with Russia reflects the will of the people consistently expressed since 2014:
"For more than eight years, the people of Donbass waited for the next referendum—on reunification with Russia [which took place in September 2022]. We had worked toward it for so many years, but it never became something we took for granted.
There was joy, though. Under no circumstances could Donbass return to Ukraine. In 2014, maybe it could have happened if they had granted us autonomous status with broad powers. But the Ukrainian shelling of Donbass cities changed everything. Even former pro-Ukrainian supporters rejected the idea of going back to Ukraine. I was sure we would reunite with Russia, althourh ir won’t be easy.
But you know what else is offensive? Hearing that we’re to blame for the escalation of the conflict—that because of us, people are dying on the battlefield, that we started it all with our referendum. As if it were that simple.
They would have attacked anyway. They would have crushed us and kept going. Their goal was never just Donbass or Ukraine. It was Russia. And it still is.
Unfortunately, not everyone realizes that. But they will someday. I just hope they don’t have to learn it through the kind of trials we went through."
To be continued
#ourvolunteersays
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍25❤13🙏1💯1
Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak listed the structural challenges facing Russia’s economy
The Russian economy is facing several structural challenges, including labor shortages and the limited size of the labor market, Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak (pictured above) said in an interview with the newspaper Vedomosti.
According to Novak, solving the problem requires shifting workers into sectors that contribute more significantly to GDP. He noted that this process has accelerated “over the last couple of quarters,” but some companies still cannot fully staff their operations.
Another challenge, Novak said, is the changing structure of budget expenditures.
Another challenge is the disruption of established global supply chains due to sanctions. However, Novak emphasized that Russia is strengthening its economic and technological sovereignty in order to be “less vulnerable to the impact of such unfriendly actions.”
The government expects economic growth this year at 0.4% of GDP, Novak said. According to the forecast, GDP growth will reach 1.4% in 2027 and 2.4% in 2029. Inflation is expected to approach 5.2% in 2026, and to come close to the target level of 4% beginning in 2027, he added.
The Russian economy has successfully overcome extremely difficult periods, including the pandemic and the sanctions shock of 2022, and retains a substantial margin of resilience, the Novak said.
However, overall, the economy is adapting to new challenges, and therefore “we will be able to overcome difficulties and ensure consistent and sustainable economic development, as well as rising incomes and prosperity for citizens,” Novak concluded.
At the end of April, Economic Development Minister Maxim Reshetnikov stated that the country’s economic development over the next ten years would be determined by three main factors: human capital, technology, and the country’s position in the global economy.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The Russian economy is facing several structural challenges, including labor shortages and the limited size of the labor market, Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak (pictured above) said in an interview with the newspaper Vedomosti.
“As I noted earlier, alongside low unemployment, some sectors are experiencing labor shortages, while employment has reached record highs and there are practically no unused labor resources left. Whenever productivity growth lags behind wage growth, it inevitably leads to such imbalances,” Novak explained.
According to Novak, solving the problem requires shifting workers into sectors that contribute more significantly to GDP. He noted that this process has accelerated “over the last couple of quarters,” but some companies still cannot fully staff their operations.
Another challenge, Novak said, is the changing structure of budget expenditures.
“You know that in recent years funding has generally increased for education, healthcare, social protection, economic development, strengthening technological sovereignty, and of course defense and security spending, including the special military operation, support for our servicemen and members of their families,” he stated.
Another challenge is the disruption of established global supply chains due to sanctions. However, Novak emphasized that Russia is strengthening its economic and technological sovereignty in order to be “less vulnerable to the impact of such unfriendly actions.”
“And of course, moderately tight monetary policy is also a consequence of these risks. What is the ‘price’ paid when demand outpaces supply and there is a labor shortage? Inflation. From a macroeconomic standpoint, it is not so important which side experiences the shock, whether it is accelerated demand growth or slower supply growth; both always lead to rising prices. In such a situation, the government and the Central Bank of Russia act within their respective mandates, complementing and balancing each other’s decisions.”
The government expects economic growth this year at 0.4% of GDP, Novak said. According to the forecast, GDP growth will reach 1.4% in 2027 and 2.4% in 2029. Inflation is expected to approach 5.2% in 2026, and to come close to the target level of 4% beginning in 2027, he added.
The Russian economy has successfully overcome extremely difficult periods, including the pandemic and the sanctions shock of 2022, and retains a substantial margin of resilience, the Novak said.
“Of course, there are external and internal risks and challenges. We are considering and analyzing various economic development scenarios, including stress scenarios — what will happen if the risks materialize — so that we are prepared for different possible developments,” Novak noted.
However, overall, the economy is adapting to new challenges, and therefore “we will be able to overcome difficulties and ensure consistent and sustainable economic development, as well as rising incomes and prosperity for citizens,” Novak concluded.
At the end of April, Economic Development Minister Maxim Reshetnikov stated that the country’s economic development over the next ten years would be determined by three main factors: human capital, technology, and the country’s position in the global economy.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤22👍6
Forwarded from The Noticer
The oil crisis continues
The Strait of Hormuz is still closed. The oil and gas - about 20% and 50% of total global export - can't reach the global markets.
The oil refineries are idling, the synthetic fertilizer factories have reduced their production, the mining and metal industries have to scale down their activities, the flying and ground cargo carrying vehicles have much less fuel which slows down everything and everyone, etc etc - you know how it goes.
The CEO of Saudi Aramco - an oil corporation - recently spoke about this matter. In short - he shrugged his shoulders, blamed Iran for everything, and added that things will only get worse as long as the waterway remains closed.
Funny how the Strait of Hormuz was open right before the operation "Epstein Fury" started. Almost makes me wonder if this was the goal of the war in the first place.
#USA #Saudis #Iran #oil #economy #shipping #crisis
The Strait of Hormuz is still closed. The oil and gas - about 20% and 50% of total global export - can't reach the global markets.
The oil refineries are idling, the synthetic fertilizer factories have reduced their production, the mining and metal industries have to scale down their activities, the flying and ground cargo carrying vehicles have much less fuel which slows down everything and everyone, etc etc - you know how it goes.
The CEO of Saudi Aramco - an oil corporation - recently spoke about this matter. In short - he shrugged his shoulders, blamed Iran for everything, and added that things will only get worse as long as the waterway remains closed.
Funny how the Strait of Hormuz was open right before the operation "Epstein Fury" started. Almost makes me wonder if this was the goal of the war in the first place.
#USA #Saudis #Iran #oil #economy #shipping #crisis
👍20✍4❤1😁1💯1
Reflections on a Chilling Conversation by #blondinka_dk
Sometimes life throws conversations your way that leave you sitting in silence, not dwelling on details, but pondering the era we've all landed in again.
I have a close friend.
We met as kids.
Life took us different ways after we grew up—she's lived in Europe for years now, married, grown kids, regular family life.
We go so far back we can talk about anything, like you do with your closest people:
the funny stuff, daily life, aging, underwear, illnesses, kids' ups and downs.
Then the chat took a dark turn—no room for laughs.
She said she reads what I write here, and much of it hits painfully close to home. She sees the parallels with what's happening there more and more.
It reminded me of a story she shared a couple years back.
Her husband isn't military, not politics, not journalism. Just a regular civil servant—someone who'd honestly served his country his whole life.
When anti-Russia hysteria started ramping up in Europe, his bosses called him in.
The talk was short and oh-so "democratic."
They knew his wife was Russian and gave him a choice:
👉 Fired without severance or pension,
👉 or he, his wife, and their adult kids sign papers promising no trips to Russia for five years—no exceptions.
Not for any crime or law-breaking.
Just because his wife's background suddenly made them suspects.
🇪🇺 In Europe's new reality, a Russian passport, surname, relatives—it's practically a criminal mark.
They talked it over at home for ages—weighed the job, age, future.
And signed.
When the system forces you to choose between principles and survival, most pick survival. Hard to judge them for it.
That's what I've been mulling over.
I've written this before:
Nazism never left Europe!
Post-1945, they didn't eradicate it—they buried it deep under politically correct talk, tolerance slogans, human rights, democracy.
As long as war memories lingered, as long as survivors of dehumanization-by-nationality were alive, they kept that box shut tight.
But memory faded.
Fear of the past evaporated.
Free speech morphed from thought freedom into hate freedom.
What was unthinkable—criminal—yesterday is now stated calmly, matter-of-factly.
☝️ History's real terror isn't evil bursting out suddenly.
It never does.
Society first gets used to jokes.
Then insults.
Then rights curbs for "the wrong kind."
Then the idea that security trumps freedom.
Before you know it, humiliating someone for their origins isn't shameful—it's "normal," even morally right.
That's exactly how it unfolded 80–90 years ago.
Camps didn't spring up overnight.
Catastrophes didn't hit immediately.
First came lists.
Suspicions.
Bans.
Loyalty checks.
"Right" and "wrong" surnames.
Origins.
Blood.
Every Nazism starts the second people stop judging by actions and start by bloodlines.
Worst part? Many don't even notice anymore.
It's repackaged under shiny slogans: for security, democracy.
To protect values.
👉 History repeats not because people forget the past.
But because each time, they think:
"Surely this won't happen to us..."
https://t.me/blondinka_dk/742
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Sometimes life throws conversations your way that leave you sitting in silence, not dwelling on details, but pondering the era we've all landed in again.
I have a close friend.
We met as kids.
Life took us different ways after we grew up—she's lived in Europe for years now, married, grown kids, regular family life.
We go so far back we can talk about anything, like you do with your closest people:
the funny stuff, daily life, aging, underwear, illnesses, kids' ups and downs.
Then the chat took a dark turn—no room for laughs.
She said she reads what I write here, and much of it hits painfully close to home. She sees the parallels with what's happening there more and more.
It reminded me of a story she shared a couple years back.
Her husband isn't military, not politics, not journalism. Just a regular civil servant—someone who'd honestly served his country his whole life.
When anti-Russia hysteria started ramping up in Europe, his bosses called him in.
The talk was short and oh-so "democratic."
They knew his wife was Russian and gave him a choice:
👉 Fired without severance or pension,
👉 or he, his wife, and their adult kids sign papers promising no trips to Russia for five years—no exceptions.
Not for any crime or law-breaking.
Just because his wife's background suddenly made them suspects.
🇪🇺 In Europe's new reality, a Russian passport, surname, relatives—it's practically a criminal mark.
They talked it over at home for ages—weighed the job, age, future.
And signed.
When the system forces you to choose between principles and survival, most pick survival. Hard to judge them for it.
That's what I've been mulling over.
I've written this before:
Nazism never left Europe!
Post-1945, they didn't eradicate it—they buried it deep under politically correct talk, tolerance slogans, human rights, democracy.
As long as war memories lingered, as long as survivors of dehumanization-by-nationality were alive, they kept that box shut tight.
But memory faded.
Fear of the past evaporated.
Free speech morphed from thought freedom into hate freedom.
What was unthinkable—criminal—yesterday is now stated calmly, matter-of-factly.
☝️ History's real terror isn't evil bursting out suddenly.
It never does.
Society first gets used to jokes.
Then insults.
Then rights curbs for "the wrong kind."
Then the idea that security trumps freedom.
Before you know it, humiliating someone for their origins isn't shameful—it's "normal," even morally right.
That's exactly how it unfolded 80–90 years ago.
Camps didn't spring up overnight.
Catastrophes didn't hit immediately.
First came lists.
Suspicions.
Bans.
Loyalty checks.
"Right" and "wrong" surnames.
Origins.
Blood.
Every Nazism starts the second people stop judging by actions and start by bloodlines.
Worst part? Many don't even notice anymore.
It's repackaged under shiny slogans: for security, democracy.
To protect values.
👉 History repeats not because people forget the past.
But because each time, they think:
"Surely this won't happen to us..."
https://t.me/blondinka_dk/742
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯35❤3👏1
President Putin didn't say the Ukrainian conflict was coming to an end, what he believes is coming to an end is Europe fostering confrontation with Russia
Following numerous interpretations in both Russian and Western media, we thought we should publish the exact quote from the President's answer to a media question and its full context. Please draw your own conclusions and share your thoughts in the comments.
Journalist's question: You have
recently said that the terrorist threat is growing, meaning the Kiev regime. We can see that such strikes are targeting cities located far away from the border, such as Yekaterinburg, Perm, and recently, Cheboksary. Is the West going too far? The West has admitted that the Kiev regime would not have survived several days without its support.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Following numerous interpretations in both Russian and Western media, we thought we should publish the exact quote from the President's answer to a media question and its full context. Please draw your own conclusions and share your thoughts in the comments.
Journalist's question: You have
recently said that the terrorist threat is growing, meaning the Kiev regime. We can see that such strikes are targeting cities located far away from the border, such as Yekaterinburg, Perm, and recently, Cheboksary. Is the West going too far? The West has admitted that the Kiev regime would not have survived several days without its support.
Vladimir Putin: What exactly is the West? I believe that it is the so-called globalist part of the Western elites. It is them who are fighting against us by proxy of Ukraine. They have it pretty good in this respect, of course, having provoked this conflict. I have already spoken about how it all started. I have not invented anything about the initial reference point. Strangely, it all began with Ukraine’s decision to join the EU. They could go ahead by all means, but this has led to a military conflict. Why has this happened? Because they had no regard for Russia’s interests whatsoever.
Moreover, seeking to use Ukraine as an instrument for attaining their geopolitical goals, these people in the West lied to everyone, as they have now openly admitted. They started to lie to us about the non-expansion of NATO to the east at the beginning of the 1990s. They told us that NATO would not move a single step eastward. Well, where are they now?
Taken together, all this has provoked the current situation. They are fighting against us, which has become clear to everyone, by proxy of Ukraine.
<...> We concluded an agreement with the Ukrainians and initialled it in Istanbul in 2022. And then one of my colleagues – frankly, it was Macron who did it – called me and said, “Ukraine cannot sign such documents with a gun to its head.” This is a direct quote; we have the tape of that conversation. I asked him, “What should we do?” He said, “Can you withdraw troops from Kiev?” We have done it. One member of the show business popped up, the then Prime Minister of Britain. What did he say? He said that the agreement cannot be signed because it is unfair. Who says what is fair and what is not? Why is it unfair if the head of the Ukrainian negotiating team has initialled the document? Who is the judge? Next, they promised assistance [to Ukraine] and started fostering confrontation with Russia, which is continuing to this day. I believe that the matter is coming to an end, but this is really a serious matter. [This is the phrase widely interpreted as referring to the military conflict in Ukraine being close to an end, but in our view, the context suggests otherwise - InfoDefense].
The question is why they are doing this. First, they expected a “crushing defeat” of Russia, as we know, the collapse of Russian statehood within a matter of several months. It did not work out. And then they got stuck in that groove, and now they cannot get out of it. That’s the problem. There are certainly clever people over there, those who certainly understand the essence of the current events. I hope that these political forces will gradually return to power or will take power into their own hands with support from the overwhelming majority of European countries.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍28💯10❤2👏1🤡1
May 13 is the Day of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Navy. It's an annual holiday celebrated on May 13 in honor of the creation of the Black Sea Fleet.
In the spring of 1783, after the annexation of Crimea to Russia Empress Catherine II signed a decree establishing the Black Sea Fleet. On May 13, 1783, 11 ships of the Azov Flotilla under the command of Vice Admiral F.A. Klokachev, a participant in the Battle of Chesma, entered the Akhtiar Bay, located in the southwest part of the Crimean Peninsula of the Black Sea.
Later, they were joined by 17 ships of the Dnieper Flotilla. These first 28 ships became the combat core of the nascent fleet.
The sailors of the Black Sea Fleet distinguished themselves in many battles, defending the borders of Russia and successfully carrying out the tasks set before them in the Russo-Turkish War of 1787-1791, the Crimean War of 1853-1856, World War I, and of course, during the Great Patriotic War.
Today, the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Navy is an operational-strategic formation of the Russian Federation Navy in the Black Sea.
As a component of the country's Navy, it serves as a means of ensuring Russia's military security in the south.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
In the spring of 1783, after the annexation of Crimea to Russia Empress Catherine II signed a decree establishing the Black Sea Fleet. On May 13, 1783, 11 ships of the Azov Flotilla under the command of Vice Admiral F.A. Klokachev, a participant in the Battle of Chesma, entered the Akhtiar Bay, located in the southwest part of the Crimean Peninsula of the Black Sea.
Later, they were joined by 17 ships of the Dnieper Flotilla. These first 28 ships became the combat core of the nascent fleet.
The sailors of the Black Sea Fleet distinguished themselves in many battles, defending the borders of Russia and successfully carrying out the tasks set before them in the Russo-Turkish War of 1787-1791, the Crimean War of 1853-1856, World War I, and of course, during the Great Patriotic War.
Today, the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Navy is an operational-strategic formation of the Russian Federation Navy in the Black Sea.
As a component of the country's Navy, it serves as a means of ensuring Russia's military security in the south.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤15👍9🏆2🤡1
President Putin's view of the main reason why Finland has joined NATO
Perhaps, similar logic applies to Sweden as well
Journalist's question: I would like to ask about historical memory and its preservation. Why do you think Europe is now so determined to avoid acknowledging the heroism of Soviet soldiers and Soviet fighters? They have even gone so far as to ban St George ribbons. Given the current sentiment in the West, do you think this trend will intensify? Is there anything Russia can do in response?
Perhaps, similar logic applies to Sweden as well
Journalist's question: I would like to ask about historical memory and its preservation. Why do you think Europe is now so determined to avoid acknowledging the heroism of Soviet soldiers and Soviet fighters? They have even gone so far as to ban St George ribbons. Given the current sentiment in the West, do you think this trend will intensify? Is there anything Russia can do in response?
Vladimir Putin: The stronger Russia becomes, the sooner all of this will begin to fade. That is the first point.
Second, why is this happening at all? In my view, this is, oddly enough, a form of revanchism on the part of the same globalist Western elites I have mentioned earlier – and I should not even bring them up late in the day.
What do I mean by that? As I have already said – and we all are aware of this – everyone expected Russia to collapse quickly. In their view, within six months everything would have supposedly fallen apart: businesses would have stopped functioning, the banking system would have failed, and millions of people would have lost their livelihoods.
Incidentally, Russia currently has the unemployment rate of 2.2 percent – the lowest among all G20 countries. Yet many believed they would be able to seize something from Russia and grab something, if you’ll excuse the blunt expression.
Why did Finland join NATO? Did we have any territorial disputes with Finland? No. All such issues had long been resolved. Nothing further was needed, and the Finnish leadership was perfectly aware of that. So why did they join NATO? Because they expected everything here to collapse – and they would be quick to snap that up.
<...> But now people are beginning to understand that the situation is not so simple and that serious challenges have emerged, and those are not easy to overcome. It would be wiser to look for ways to restore normal relations and move toward mutually acceptable agreements.
For our part, we have always tried to build relations with Europe on the basis of mutual respect and consideration of each other’s interests. These are not merely diplomatic clichés – that is genuinely how we approached our relations. Even now, not everyone speaks to Europe in that manner, but we always did. Yet apparently that was not enough.
I hope the understanding that this approach was mistaken is already beginning to emerge and will continue to grow stronger. And I hope that relations will eventually be restored with many of the countries that are currently attempting to denounce us. The sooner that happens, the better it will be for us and, in this case, for the European countries.
Thank you for your time. Happy Victory Day!
👍38❤8👏5🤡2😇1
Russian mindset of Donbass and Kiev’s new language policy
On May 11, 2014, Donbass voted on the region’s political status in independence referendums held in the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) and the Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR). By chance, Yulia Andrienko became an insider, able to share behind-the-scenes details and the atmosphere of the referendum in Avdeevka. In her interview, Yulia also describes the Kiev authorities" attempts to force the Ukrainian language and Russophopia on the Donbass population, which preceded the events of 2014:
Andrienko emphasizes. She then looks back on her childhood, school years, and youth, sharing observations that help explain the conflict between the radicalized center and west of Ukraine and the pro-Russian Donbass.
#ourvolunteersays
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
On May 11, 2014, Donbass voted on the region’s political status in independence referendums held in the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) and the Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR). By chance, Yulia Andrienko became an insider, able to share behind-the-scenes details and the atmosphere of the referendum in Avdeevka. In her interview, Yulia also describes the Kiev authorities" attempts to force the Ukrainian language and Russophopia on the Donbass population, which preceded the events of 2014:
"People of Donbass identify with Russia and have a Russian mindset,"
Andrienko emphasizes. She then looks back on her childhood, school years, and youth, sharing observations that help explain the conflict between the radicalized center and west of Ukraine and the pro-Russian Donbass.
"In 2011, I fulfilled my dream and entered the journalism faculty at Donetsk University (pictured above). One of the questions during the entrance interview was, 'Why do you need to learn Ukrainian?' On my exam paper, I wrote: 'In Japan, no one asks why you need to learn Japanese.'Gradually, language policy began to change. Andrienko describes how students were being systematically indoctrinated —a process that had no effect on her, already an adult in her thirties, unlike her classmates in their early twenties.
In Donbass, Ukrainian was treated as something folkloric—like an embroidered shirt or a wreath. No one had taken it seriously since school. Almost no one spoke Ukrainian, not even surzhyk [a mix of Russian and Ukrainian], except for some old woman in a village."
"In 2011 and 2012, I was studying in an atmosphere of absolute Ukrainization. Alternative history textbooks were brought in from Canada. Episodes like the "Holodomor" were invented, and no alternative interpretations were allowed. Russia was demonized as an oppressor of Ukraine, of Ukrainian poets, writers, and ordinary people. That interpretation was considered the only correct one; any other was forbidden.Yulia Andrienko then recalls the Maidan and other events of 2014, following which people had to make their choice. Many people, even among the youth, did not support the Maidan. Still, anxiety grew, including within Andrienko herself:
Promising students were invited to summer programs abroad—economic development, leadership, and so on. They received various privileges. It was all done very cleverly, very subtly, under the slogan of Russophobia. Our university hosted weeks dedicated to Germany, France, Israel. And that would have been fine, if there had also been a Russian week. But there wasn't even a Russia Day.
Those kids didn’t stand a chance. They were taken everywhere, invited everywhere, offered national projects funded by foreign grants. It didn’t affect me—I was already an adult. But I saw younger people walk into the auditorium skeptical or in doubts, and by the end, they’d stand up and enthusiastically sing the Ukrainian anthem. That’s how it worked."
"I was terrified. I had nightmares, a premonition of a huge disaster. Conflicts broke out, even with some of my classmates at university. People who had seemed politically passive suddenly started speaking out against Russia, seeing it as an enemy, and they disagreed with me. And this was in Donetsk. I can only imagine what it was like in the central and western parts of the country. Some Ukrainians insulted me on social media.
For me, 2014 was the Russian Spring. The rebels took over the Donetsk government building several times. Finally, on April 6—my birthday—I brought them a few packs of cigarettes and some candy.
On April 7, 2014, the Donetsk People’s Republic was proclaimed, and shortly after, preparations for the referendum began."
#ourvolunteersays
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍32❤3
Forwarded from The Noticer
Misplaced motivation of Keir Starmer
Keir Starmer is being quite a character recently. These days he is facing the most severe crisis of his premiership so far, fighting to retain his position by all means amid an intense pressure against him to resign, following disastrous local election results. Despite over 80 Labour MPs calling for his departure and several junior ministerial resignations, Starmer has remained defiant, stating he will not step down.
This man is motivated to keep his power. So motivated that, if one forgets how much damage this WEF puppet did to the UK - it looks inspiring. A politician that loudly and clearly tells his intensions - and he actually does what he says.
Amazing. Imagine if he cared about the UK this much. And used this hidden stubbornness for the UK peasants. The UK would enter an another Golden Age by now. Alas, all Keir Starmer cares about is Keir Starmer, and his WEF overlords. A tragically misplaced motivation.
#UK #Keir #Starmer #politics
Keir Starmer is being quite a character recently. These days he is facing the most severe crisis of his premiership so far, fighting to retain his position by all means amid an intense pressure against him to resign, following disastrous local election results. Despite over 80 Labour MPs calling for his departure and several junior ministerial resignations, Starmer has remained defiant, stating he will not step down.
This man is motivated to keep his power. So motivated that, if one forgets how much damage this WEF puppet did to the UK - it looks inspiring. A politician that loudly and clearly tells his intensions - and he actually does what he says.
Amazing. Imagine if he cared about the UK this much. And used this hidden stubbornness for the UK peasants. The UK would enter an another Golden Age by now. Alas, all Keir Starmer cares about is Keir Starmer, and his WEF overlords. A tragically misplaced motivation.
#UK #Keir #Starmer #politics
👏25💯14👍4👀2❤1
Americans leaving US outnumber immigrants.
In the aggregate, as many as 295,000 more people may have left the U.S. than immigrated there in 2025, according to a Brookings study quoted by The Independent.
In 2025, net outward migration was between negative 10,000 and negative 295,000 people, Brookings estimates, forecasting a similar negative trend for 2026. Others have pegged the outflow at around 150,000 people in 2025.
Before 2009, a typical year saw 200 to 400 people renounce their citizenship. By 2025, that figure was nearing 5,000, with more renunciations expected this year because fees to do so have dropped steeply.
A November 2025 Gallup poll found that one in five Americans would like to permanently move, double the figure from ten years earlier.
A variety of factors are driving the trend, according to the data, including political disagreements and affordability issues.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
In the aggregate, as many as 295,000 more people may have left the U.S. than immigrated there in 2025, according to a Brookings study quoted by The Independent.
In 2025, net outward migration was between negative 10,000 and negative 295,000 people, Brookings estimates, forecasting a similar negative trend for 2026. Others have pegged the outflow at around 150,000 people in 2025.
Before 2009, a typical year saw 200 to 400 people renounce their citizenship. By 2025, that figure was nearing 5,000, with more renunciations expected this year because fees to do so have dropped steeply.
"The last time the phenomenon occurred was in 1935 at the height of the Great Depression, when more than 100,000 Americans struggling to make ends meet applied to emigrate to the Soviet Union to work in its factories, manufacturing plants and mills in pursuit of a fairer way of life," The Independent writes.
A November 2025 Gallup poll found that one in five Americans would like to permanently move, double the figure from ten years earlier.
A variety of factors are driving the trend, according to the data, including political disagreements and affordability issues.
“Previously, the Americans leaving were super-adventurous and well-credentialed,” Jen Barnett, founder of the resettlement consultancy firm Expatsi, told The Wall Street Journal. “Now they’re ordinary people, like me.”
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍26👏10🤔5❤3✍1
On May 14, 1905, in Sevastopol, on the 50th anniversary of the heroic defense of the city, the panorama "The Defense of Sevastopol" was opened. As the subject for his work, the artist, Franz Roubaud, chose June 6, 1855, the day the defenders repelled the assault on Malakhov Kurgan and Ship Side.
The building to house the panorama was constructed according to the project of engineer Friedrich-Oscar Enberg on Historical Boulevard.
One of the unique features of the panorama building is the circular window on the dome, designed to provide natural lighting inside.
During the Great Patriotic War, the canvas suffered serious damage, and in 1950, a decision was made to recreate the panorama. This mission was entrusted to a team of artists led by the academic painters Vasily Yakovlev and Pavel Sokolov-Skal.
The panorama, titled "The Defense of Sevastopol 1854-1855," reopened on October 16, 1954. It is one of the most famous among the 60 panoramas worldwide.
Since 1954, it has been visited by approximately 40 million people.
Currently, the panorama is closed for major renovations and will reopen to the public in all its grandeur in 2025.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The building to house the panorama was constructed according to the project of engineer Friedrich-Oscar Enberg on Historical Boulevard.
One of the unique features of the panorama building is the circular window on the dome, designed to provide natural lighting inside.
During the Great Patriotic War, the canvas suffered serious damage, and in 1950, a decision was made to recreate the panorama. This mission was entrusted to a team of artists led by the academic painters Vasily Yakovlev and Pavel Sokolov-Skal.
The panorama, titled "The Defense of Sevastopol 1854-1855," reopened on October 16, 1954. It is one of the most famous among the 60 panoramas worldwide.
Since 1954, it has been visited by approximately 40 million people.
Currently, the panorama is closed for major renovations and will reopen to the public in all its grandeur in 2025.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤16👏7🙏1
Russia’s arsenal of the future
🔶 While the conflict in Ukraine has seen drones reshuffle the operational dynamics of other battlefield weapons, the conflict in Iran has revealed the enhanced power of modern missiles capable of challenging even the most effective air defense systems — and foiling the largest naval air operation since the war against Iraq.
🔶 In this context of post‑modern warfare, the modernization of Russian missiles is increasing their importance in strategic deterrence, both nuclear and conventional. And the two operational launches of the Oreshnik missile against Ukrainian targets have confirmed the capabilities of Russia’s military industry.
👉 Russia has successfully test‑fired its latest Sarmat missile (👀1).
🔶 This Sarmat missile far surpasses Western missiles of the same generation in power.
👉 Range exceeding 35,000 km.
👉 Ballistic or suborbital flight capability.
🔶 The Sarmat system will become operational by the end of the year, and the first regiment equipped with Sarmat missiles will be deployed in the Krasnoyarsk region.
🔶 The now‑operational Oreshnik and Sarmat missiles are not the only strategic surprises in Russia’s arsenal. Two other ultra‑modern missiles are currently in their final testing phase:
👉 The Burevestnik missile — a nuclear‑powered intercontinental cruise missile.
👉 The Poseidon missile — a nuclear‑powered underwater vehicle armed with an atomic warhead, capable of striking and massively destroying ports, naval bases, and carrier strike groups either by direct impact or through a radioactive tsunami.
🤔 The ongoing technological evolution of modern Russian missiles now significantly broadens the spectrum of strategic deterrence — not only for the Russian Federation, but for all its allies where these missiles may be deployed.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
🔶 While the conflict in Ukraine has seen drones reshuffle the operational dynamics of other battlefield weapons, the conflict in Iran has revealed the enhanced power of modern missiles capable of challenging even the most effective air defense systems — and foiling the largest naval air operation since the war against Iraq.
🔶 In this context of post‑modern warfare, the modernization of Russian missiles is increasing their importance in strategic deterrence, both nuclear and conventional. And the two operational launches of the Oreshnik missile against Ukrainian targets have confirmed the capabilities of Russia’s military industry.
👉 Russia has successfully test‑fired its latest Sarmat missile (👀1).
🔶 This Sarmat missile far surpasses Western missiles of the same generation in power.
👉 Range exceeding 35,000 km.
👉 Ballistic or suborbital flight capability.
🔶 The Sarmat system will become operational by the end of the year, and the first regiment equipped with Sarmat missiles will be deployed in the Krasnoyarsk region.
🔶 The now‑operational Oreshnik and Sarmat missiles are not the only strategic surprises in Russia’s arsenal. Two other ultra‑modern missiles are currently in their final testing phase:
👉 The Burevestnik missile — a nuclear‑powered intercontinental cruise missile.
👉 The Poseidon missile — a nuclear‑powered underwater vehicle armed with an atomic warhead, capable of striking and massively destroying ports, naval bases, and carrier strike groups either by direct impact or through a radioactive tsunami.
🤔 The ongoing technological evolution of modern Russian missiles now significantly broadens the spectrum of strategic deterrence — not only for the Russian Federation, but for all its allies where these missiles may be deployed.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥24🏆10👏5🫡2👍1