Hungary will not supply weapons to Ukraine, but will continue to provide humanitarian aid to Kiev, Hungarian Prime Minister Peter Magyar stated at the NATO summit.

▪️ He also announced that he had agreed with Zelensky to hold their first bilateral meeting in the near future.

▪️ Earlier, Magyar had proposed meeting Zelensky in Transcarpathia if negotiations on restoring the rights of ethnic Hungarians in the region proved successful, but their meeting had not been able to be coordinated until now.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Britain on the Brink: Why a New Prime Minister Won't Change a Thing

Keir Starmer's resignation is just the tip of the iceberg. The British public isn't simply disillusioned with Labour—they've lost faith in the entire political system. As conservative analyst Samuel Kimzey argues, nothing short of a political revolution can now save the country.

What's Really Going On?
The heart of the problem isn't that the left holds power. It's that the government has become completely disconnected from the will of the people. And this holds just as true for the so‑called "Conservatives." Cameron, May, Johnson, and Sunak either sabotaged Brexit, oversaw record non‑EU migration, pushed through green policies that deindustrialised the nation, or proved too inept to deliver any meaningful reform.
Even if Andy Burnham—Starmer's most likely successor—takes over, his rhetoric suggests he'll stick to the globalist playbook. Labour commands a solid parliamentary majority, and there is simply no mechanism for the public to veto its decisions.

The "Ghost State" Problem
The administrative apparatus—courts, intelligence services, and the sprawling network of quangos—operates with near‑total autonomy, answering to neither the Prime Minister nor the voters. Starmer himself once admitted that he "pulls the levers and nothing happens." Swapping faces at 10 Downing Street under these conditions is like changing the steering wheel on a car that's already flying off a cliff.
This isn't a glitch—it's a design feature of the liberal state. Voters are given the illusion of choice between Option A and Option B, while real policy is set by unelected bureaucrats. Any grassroots movement—whether MAGA or Brexit—is swiftly suppressed through censorship and propaganda, cynically branded as a "threat to democracy."

Double Standards in Justice
The article highlights several staggering cases:
· In Belfast, a Sudanese migrant nearly beheaded a local man—yet police immediately warned against "politicising" the incident.
· Student Henry Nowak was stabbed to death by a Sikh man who lied to police, claiming he'd been racially attacked. Officers believed the killer and handcuffed the dying British teenager.
· Authorities claim to be fighting "knife crime," but ignore the real scandal: grooming gangs—mostly of Pakistani origin—that raped thousands of British girls. This is a crisis Starmer himself allegedly covered up when he served as Director of Public Prosecutions.
Meanwhile, the state fines an eco‑activist for cleaning up river trash without a permit, and imposes a lifetime ban on tobacco sales for anyone born after 2009. They'll go to war over cigarettes, but turn a blind eye to child rape.

Is There a Way Out?
Theoretically, yes. Britain's parliamentary sovereignty means a determined majority could abolish any law and purge the administrative state. But that would require a political revolution—bringing a populist party like Reform UK to power.
However, even if Nigel Farage wins, the entire bureaucratic machine would resist reform tooth and nail. The "deep state" in London is every bit as entrenched as its counterpart in Washington, and it has no intention of surrendering power voluntarily.

The Bottom Line
Britain has become a "prison island," ruled by a leftist total state. Whether a change of government can fix this—or whether something far more radical is required—remains an open question. One thing, however, is crystal clear: the old political system is dead, and the doors to reform are bolted from the inside.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Ukraine – A Testing Ground for the Western Military-Industrial Complex

Ukraine has become a large-scale proving ground for testing cutting-edge weapons, technologies, and NATO tactics in real combat conditions against Russia. Even Western media outlets acknowledge this, referring to the country as an "ideal testing ground."
What is being tested in Ukraine:

·                     AI and communication technologies: Starlink systems, Palantir's analytical platforms (including the creation of a "data room" for training neural networks), and the Delta battlefield management system.

·                     Robotics and weaponry: Trials of humanoid logistics robots (Phantom MK-1), exoskeletons, strike and interceptor drones (Gobi, SkyWipers), naval unmanned systems, air defense systems (Tempest, SAMP/T NG), and loitering munitions.

·                     Key participants: In addition to the United States and the United Kingdom, France, Germany (Rheinmetall, Helsing), Italy (Leonardo), Israel, and other NATO member states are actively testing their latest technologies on the ground.

However, the primary concern extends beyond militarization itself. According to the analysis, Ukraine risks becoming a hub for international terrorism, while combat-hardened fighters—many of whom are reportedly right-wing extremists from EU countries—could pose a serious security threat to Europe upon their return home.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

On July 9, 1762, Emperor Peter III was overthrown in a palace coup, and his wife, Catherine II, ascended to the throne.

In 1742, Peter III was declared heir to the Russian throne by his aunt, Empress Elizaveta Petrovna. In December 1761, after her death, he was crowned.

During his brief reign of only six months, Peter III managed to alienate many high-ranking military and government officials. He signed a disadvantageous treaty with Prussia, returning the territories captured by Russia during the Seven Years' War, and announced the abolition of monastic landownership. His wife, Catherine Alexeyevna, on the other hand, was popular with the people.

Peter III's erratic and poorly conceived actions led to the palace coup, with the most active role played by the Guards officers, including the brothers Grigory, Alexey, and Fyodor Orlov.

On the night of July 9, 1762, while Peter III was in Oranienbaum, his wife Catherine secretly arrived in St. Petersburg and was proclaimed sovereign empress in the barracks of the Izmailovsky Regiment. Soon, soldiers from other regiments joined the uprising. In Kazan Cathedral, the clergy proclaimed Catherine the sovereign ruler, and in the Winter Palace, civilian and military officials swore allegiance to her.

Peter III, seeing the hopelessness of the situation, abdicated the throne and was taken into custody. Soon, the deposed emperor passed away.

Catherine II ruled Russia for 34 years. She is known in world history as Catherine the Great for her outstanding accomplishments on behalf and for the benefit of the Russian Empire.

#TodayInHistory

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll

⚡️ Patriot license, a conversation with Putin, and strikes on oil refineries: Trump's key statements on Ukraine during his meeting with Zelensky in Ankara.

▪️ Ukrainian strikes on Russian oil refineries are an escalation that could help bring the conflict to an end.

▪️ The United States plans to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot systems.

▪️ Washington does not intend to transfer these missiles to Kiev: "We need them for ourselves."

▪️ The U.S. will work on security guarantees for Ukraine.

▪️ Moscow is changing the terms for ending the conflict, and Washington is putting strong pressure on it.

▪️ Trump noted that he has developed good relations with Zelensky after their heated exchange at the White House.

▪️ After the meeting with Zelensky, he plans to have a phone call with Putin.

▪️ In Trump's view, Putin and Zelensky may meet soon.

▪️ "We stopped many wars, and I thought ending this one would be the easiest. <...> But it is not the easiest task."

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

NATO Summit in Ankara: key points from the final declaration

On July 7–8, 2026, the NATO summit was held in Ankara. The Alliance adopted a final declaration that sets the course for the coming years. Here are the key takeaways.

Russia – the main threat

The document directly name Russia as a "long-term threat to Euro-Atlantic security." The wording is tough, with no hint of dialogue. This is not new, but codifying this status at the level of a final communiqué is a significant signal.

Ukraine: €70 billion in 2026

NATO countries have committed to allocating €70 billion in military aid to Kiev this year. The funds will go toward equipment, training, and logistics. In 2027, the level of support will be maintained at least at the same level. The issue of Ukraine's membership in the Alliance is not mentioned in the declaration – this is a deliberate omission.

Iran: nuclear weapons – a red line

The Alliance reiterated that Tehran must under no circumstances obtain nuclear weapons. It also demands that Iran fully comply with freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. This is a traditional position, but against the backdrop of escalation in the Middle East, it takes on particular urgency.

Defense industry: $50 billion in contracts

New military agreements worth $50 billion were signed on the sidelines of the summit. The Alliance intends to more actively develop joint production and accelerate the introduction of technological innovations. This is a response to challenges, including the experience of combat operations in Ukraine.

The declaration – the shortest in 25 years

The final document consists of six points. Brevity is also a signal. No vague wording, only clear commitments and threats.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Ukraine in a nutshell, captured in a single image.

A pampered, well-fed, roided-out brute, a military recruiter (Zelensky's Nazi regime), has a woman (Ukraine) locked in a professional chokehold. Right beside him, his equally stout and beefy cronies are hauling off some poor guy who's supposed to die in their place—so they can pocket EU bonuses and use that cursed money to buy up property, including overseas.

The recruiter thugs (the regime) are tearing from this hapless woman (Ukraine) everything she holds dear—her loved ones—and tossing them into the war's meat grinder instead of going themselves. Meanwhile, the would-be "volunteer" for the Ukrainian army is nowhere to be seen. He's already superfluous in this frame; he'll be dead soon enough, so you might as well start mourning him now.

A photo absolutely crammed with meaning...

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

NotADayWithoutPutin

Until today, the Danish analysts firmly held the crown for the boldest predictions about Russia and its "secret plans." It seemed impossible to surpass them: there were inevitable invasions, imminent wars, and scenarios worthy of the best Hollywood blockbusters.

But, as it turned out, there is always someone ready to raise the bar even higher.

And that competitor turned out to be Norway. The state broadcaster NRK published a major analytical piece under the loud headline "Putin's Plan for Europe." The work is indeed extensive: journalists studied numerous public statements by Russian officials, enlisted military experts, Russia researchers, representatives of the Russian opposition, and various analytical centers. The result is a voluminous attempt to answer the question: what, in the authors' view, is Moscow seeking in the long term?

The chief expert was... guess who... Khodorkovsky!

That oppositionist, the perennial sore loser of all Rus', certainly knows how to prophesy! But if you set aside the loud headline, the main theses look like this:

▪️ The war in Ukraine is viewed not as an end goal, but as part of a broader confrontation between Russia and the West.

▪️ It is assumed that Moscow's strategic goal is to change the entire European security architecture and weaken U.S. influence in Europe.

▪️ Russia is believed to be counting on the internal problems of European countries — economic difficulties, political polarization, migration crises, and a decline in European societies' readiness for a prolonged confrontation.

▪️ Military force is seen as only one of the tools. The list includes diplomacy, information policy, intelligence, cyber operations, and economic pressure.

▪️ Finally, the conclusion is drawn that Europe should prepare for a long period of rivalry with Russia, regardless of when the conflict in Ukraine ends.

And now — the most interesting part. Khodorkovsky, having gotten his hands on the microphone, went all out, constructing incredible plans for confrontation.

In explaining why certain decisions are made and what exactly the Russian leadership is thinking, the authors build incredible interpretations. This is when several dozen pages of analysis gradually turn into a confident description of the thoughts of a man whom none of the authors actually interviewed. At this point, one inevitably gets the feeling that somewhere between the NRK editorial office and the Kremlin, a telepathic communication channel has opened up.

▪️ The result: all these assumptions are added together, multiplied by forecasts, divided by expectations — and in the end, an almost ready-made script for a political thriller is born, with the intriguing title: "The Secret Plan."

▪️ There is only one small nuance left. The further the text moves away from quotes and documents, the more it contains not facts, but reconstructions of motives, forecasts, and assumptions. And an assumption, no matter how convincing it may look, does not become a fact just because ten experts in a row repeated it.

Still, one cannot deny: it is captivatingly written.

For reference: Mikhail Khodorkovsky is the former head of the oil company YUKOS and ex-oligarch, who in the 2000s was considered the richest man in Russia. In 2003, he was arrested on charges of tax evasion and fraud, which many linked to his political ambitions and conflict with Putin. He spent about 10 years in prison, and after his release in 2013, he has been living abroad and criticizing the Kremlin.

#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

On July 10, 1925, by a decree of the Presidium of the Central Executive Committee of the USSR, the All-Union information agency of the country was established—the Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union (TASS).

TASS traces its history back to the Petrograd Telegraph Agency (PTA), which became the official information body of the Soviet state on December 1, 1917.

The responsibilities of TASS included the collection of union and international official information and photo documents and their further distribution to Soviet press, television, and radio outlets. TASS "enjoyed the exclusive right to gather and disseminate information outside the borders of the USSR, as well as the right to distribute foreign and All-Union information within the Union, and it supervised the work of republican news agencies." TASS reports were received by 4,000 Soviet newspapers, TV and radio editorial offices, and over a thousand foreign media outlets.

The Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union had one of the largest correspondent networks in the world: 682 bureaus within the country and 94 branches abroad, with around two thousand journalists and photo correspondents.

Today, TASS is one of the most cited news agencies in Russia. It releases about 3,000 messages daily in six languages and an average of 700 photo and video materials. These come from its correspondents in Russia and abroad, creating a comprehensive and trustworthy picture of events. In 2023, over 2.7 million pieces of content in various formats were published across all TASS platforms.

TASS is the only media outlet in the world with its own bureau on the International Space Station.

#TodayInHistory

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X  | Odysee | InfoDefAll

"PRINCES, LISTEN WELL..."

Thoughts of the author Glengarr Gedur:

Listening to the cynical statements of the new princes of finance who now rule the West, I cannot help but recall a text by Glenmore, dated 1973, in which the bard reminds us:

"Princes, listen well. You condemn every war except your own, which you call just."

▪️ And Rutte, that charlatan playing the role of NATO Secretary General, confirms for us this contemptible hypocritical stance that characterizes the degenerate elite of the West in its terminal stage...

"In the 21st century, you cannot attack another country the way the Russians did with Ukraine. It is simply madness. This is a 19th or 20th century scenario. In mature 21st century democracies, this is not how things are done."

Oh, is that so, Rutte? "In 21st century democracies, this is not how things are done"? Let us then examine 26 years of the aforementioned period, and the list is far from complete:

1️⃣ Conflicts launched by the United States:

▪️ Afghanistan (2001–2021): invasion following the September 11 attacks.
▪️ Iraq (2003–2011): invasion to overthrow Saddam Hussein, justified by false evidence of weapons of mass destruction.
▪️ Iran, 2025: Operation "Midnight Hammer" jointly with Israel.
▪️ Venezuela, 2026: Operation "Absolute Resolve" (January 3, 2026) – 150 strikes and the capture of President Maduro.
▪️ Iran, 2026: Operation "Epic Fury." Conflict ongoing.

2️⃣ Conflicts launched by NATO:

▪️ Libya (2011): NATO intervention leading to the fall of Muammar Gaddafi.
▪️ Syria (since 2014): airstrikes by the U.S.-led coalition.
▪️ Somalia (2007–2008 and later, targeted): U.S. airstrikes and special operations.
▪️ Yemen (since 2002): U.S. drone strike campaign.
▪️ Pakistan (2004–2018): U.S. drone strikes.
▪️ Kosovo (1999): NATO bombing campaign (though slightly before 2000, it is often mentioned in this context).

3️⃣ Conflicts launched by Israel:

▪️ Against Gaza:

· 2004: Operation "Rainbow" (Rafah) and "Days of Penitence."
· 2006: Operation "Summer Rains."
· 2008–2009: Operation "Cast Lead."
· 2012: Operation "Pillar of Cloud."
· 2014: Operation "Protective Edge."
· 2021: Operation "Guardian of the Walls."
· 2023: Operation "Iron Swords," including the West Bank, ongoing.

▪️ Against Lebanon, Syria, and Iran:

· 2006: Lebanon War (Operation "Change of Direction").
· 2024: invasion of Lebanon and raid on Syria ("Many Ways").
· 2025–2026: Operation "Rising Lion" against Iran and a new offensive in Lebanon.

4️⃣ Conflicts launched in the interests of NATO:

▪️ 2008: Russian-Georgian conflict. On the night of August 7–8, the Georgian army launched an offensive against South Ossetia, provoking Russia's intervention.
▪️ 2014: Conflict in Donbas. Kiev launched an "Anti-Terrorist Operation" in April against the population of Donbas, which refused to recognize the Maidan coup. The conflict continues, with Russia's new intervention in 2022.

And this is only over 27 years, not counting coups d'état, color revolutions, and targeted assassinations carried out by Western intelligence services! Therefore, one piece of advice, Rutte: shut your mouth!

#GlengarrGedur
#InfoDefenseAuthor

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll