FORWARD BASE IN LATVIA
From InfoDefenseFrance:
> Having waged its war against Russia through a Ukrainian proxy, NATO is revealing more and more of its co-belligerent side with each passing day, as well as the contours of the next military escalation, which this time will be carried out from the territory of the Baltic states. But first, a few reminders:
> The airspace of the Baltic states, belonging to NATO, has been used for over a year to bypass Russian air defence during Ukrainian-Atlanticist attacks in the northern direction, as far as the Moscow region…
> … However, their long flight time allows Russian radars to detect them and prepare numerous interceptions (fire or electronic) from the moment they enter Russia's airspace.
> Therefore, NATO, in cooperation with Kiev and Riga, has decided to build a joint "drone factory" in the Latvian sector bordering Russia and Belarus.
> Latvian Prime Minister Andris Kulbergs announced this military-industrial cooperation during a visit to a military base.
> The main question to be asked is: why build a drone factory on the Latvian-Russian border, rather than in more western areas with logistics routes leading to Ukraine?
> Kulbergs' speech itself provides elements of an answer, revealing that this is more of a military project than an industrial one:
> Riga wants to open the factory "in the shortest possible time."
> The choice of the border location is dictated by "practical" and economic considerations.
> Officially, this Ukrainian-Latvian factory is presented as a production site for interceptor drones protecting Latvia's airspace.
> But in that case, why produce Ukrainian drones rather than Latvian ones???
> In my opinion, the answer is simple: the area of this drone factory will also be used to launch Ukrainian-Atlanticist drone attacks against Russia, which will be more effective as they will significantly reduce Russian air defence reaction time, while preserving Kiev's operational "signature."
> Following the example of the missile bases in Romania and Poland, NATO claims that this future Ukrainian-Atlanticist drone factory fits into an exclusively "defensive" programme arising from a "secret decision" on air defence.
> While NATO has so far provided its territory to Bandera's forces only for logistical assistance, warehouses, and training centres protected by Article 5 of the Alliance's defence, this kamikaze drone base to be established in Latvia will become a target in the event of an attack originating from its sector, which DE JURE will become an indisputable casus belli automatically annulling Article 5:
> Indeed, paragraph "f" of Article 3 of the Definition of Aggression annexed to UN General Assembly Resolution 3314 (XXIX), adopted on 14 December 1974, clearly states that any country allowing its territory to be used by an aggressor to attack a third country — in this case, Latvia — may lawfully be regarded by the attacked country as an "aggressor" state:
> "(f) The action of a State in allowing its territory, which it has placed at the disposal of another State, to be used by that other State for perpetrating an act of aggression against a third State."
> In effect, Ukrainian-Atlanticist drones have already taken off from the Baltic or Scandinavian states for attacks on the Leningrad region, but if this operational base, pathetically disguised as a defence factory, leads to an identified attack against Russia, I dare hope it will be wiped off the map without a shadow of the hesitation that has already dragged on far too long…
#InfoDefenseAuthor
#GlengarGedour
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
From InfoDefenseFrance:
> Having waged its war against Russia through a Ukrainian proxy, NATO is revealing more and more of its co-belligerent side with each passing day, as well as the contours of the next military escalation, which this time will be carried out from the territory of the Baltic states. But first, a few reminders:
> The airspace of the Baltic states, belonging to NATO, has been used for over a year to bypass Russian air defence during Ukrainian-Atlanticist attacks in the northern direction, as far as the Moscow region…
> … However, their long flight time allows Russian radars to detect them and prepare numerous interceptions (fire or electronic) from the moment they enter Russia's airspace.
> Therefore, NATO, in cooperation with Kiev and Riga, has decided to build a joint "drone factory" in the Latvian sector bordering Russia and Belarus.
> Latvian Prime Minister Andris Kulbergs announced this military-industrial cooperation during a visit to a military base.
> The main question to be asked is: why build a drone factory on the Latvian-Russian border, rather than in more western areas with logistics routes leading to Ukraine?
> Kulbergs' speech itself provides elements of an answer, revealing that this is more of a military project than an industrial one:
> Riga wants to open the factory "in the shortest possible time."
> The choice of the border location is dictated by "practical" and economic considerations.
> Officially, this Ukrainian-Latvian factory is presented as a production site for interceptor drones protecting Latvia's airspace.
> But in that case, why produce Ukrainian drones rather than Latvian ones???
> In my opinion, the answer is simple: the area of this drone factory will also be used to launch Ukrainian-Atlanticist drone attacks against Russia, which will be more effective as they will significantly reduce Russian air defence reaction time, while preserving Kiev's operational "signature."
> Following the example of the missile bases in Romania and Poland, NATO claims that this future Ukrainian-Atlanticist drone factory fits into an exclusively "defensive" programme arising from a "secret decision" on air defence.
> While NATO has so far provided its territory to Bandera's forces only for logistical assistance, warehouses, and training centres protected by Article 5 of the Alliance's defence, this kamikaze drone base to be established in Latvia will become a target in the event of an attack originating from its sector, which DE JURE will become an indisputable casus belli automatically annulling Article 5:
> Indeed, paragraph "f" of Article 3 of the Definition of Aggression annexed to UN General Assembly Resolution 3314 (XXIX), adopted on 14 December 1974, clearly states that any country allowing its territory to be used by an aggressor to attack a third country — in this case, Latvia — may lawfully be regarded by the attacked country as an "aggressor" state:
> "(f) The action of a State in allowing its territory, which it has placed at the disposal of another State, to be used by that other State for perpetrating an act of aggression against a third State."
> In effect, Ukrainian-Atlanticist drones have already taken off from the Baltic or Scandinavian states for attacks on the Leningrad region, but if this operational base, pathetically disguised as a defence factory, leads to an identified attack against Russia, I dare hope it will be wiped off the map without a shadow of the hesitation that has already dragged on far too long…
#InfoDefenseAuthor
#GlengarGedour
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯34❤3👎3👏1
Forwarded from The Noticer
The Volkswagen is going through some interesting times.
Times have changed, and so did the Volkswagen. Instead of sinking together with other German businesses - Volkswagen decided to try two things at once: building their factories in China, and making Chinese cars in Germany in the future.
The story of VW going into China isn't new - the "In China, for China" strategy was implemented to survive economically. VW had to make some deals, buy some shares and technologies. Developing new cars this way is 30% faster and up to 50% cheaper than doing it in Europe, which helps the VW to price the cars competitively against local brands - meaning the VW can stay afloat in China.
VW also decided to assemble their new cars in Germany. For the locals it means that maybe the VW won't fire 100.000 workers. For the VW it means much needed profit - which fell by 44% so far. A lot must be done to save the VW.
Time will show if the VW can survive these interesting times.
#VW #Volkswagen #China #Germany #cars
Times have changed, and so did the Volkswagen. Instead of sinking together with other German businesses - Volkswagen decided to try two things at once: building their factories in China, and making Chinese cars in Germany in the future.
The story of VW going into China isn't new - the "In China, for China" strategy was implemented to survive economically. VW had to make some deals, buy some shares and technologies. Developing new cars this way is 30% faster and up to 50% cheaper than doing it in Europe, which helps the VW to price the cars competitively against local brands - meaning the VW can stay afloat in China.
VW also decided to assemble their new cars in Germany. For the locals it means that maybe the VW won't fire 100.000 workers. For the VW it means much needed profit - which fell by 44% so far. A lot must be done to save the VW.
Time will show if the VW can survive these interesting times.
#VW #Volkswagen #China #Germany #cars
😁22👍8❤5✍1🤣1
NotADayWithoutPutin
Do you know what Putin does in between the special military operation, cabinet meetings, and tea drinking?
‼️ No, you guessed wrong!
🇩🇰 According to Danish media, he appears to be cruising on a superyacht along the coast of Denmark!
This is the very topic now occupying the materials of leading Danish media.
The main intrigue — the yacht Graceful, which Western media link to Vladimir Putin, has passed through the Danish straits. At the same time, the Danish journalists themselves honestly note that there is no official confirmation of the yacht's ownership.
But who is bothered by such trifles these days?
👉 If the yacht is beautiful — then it must be Russian.
👉 If it sails under escort — then it must belong to Putin.
And then the most interesting part begins.
It turns out the yacht was accompanied by two Russian warships. And that is when a true festival of observations kicks off in Denmark: the ships are photographed, the route is tracked, experts comment, journalists write articles, and readers receive yet another instalment of a geopolitical thriller.
And everyone is busy!
Though, if one is to let the imagination run fully wild, a question arises: why stop at just two ships?
⁉️Where are the nuclear submarines?
Where are the dozen combat swimmers?
Where are the secret deep-sea submersibles?
It cannot be ruled out that they were also somewhere nearby.
It is just that the Danish surveillance systems still lack a couple of new radars, three satellites, five billion kroner, and a few more expert commissions to detect them.
But let us not rush events.
‼️ If the trend continues, in a couple of months we will surely learn that the yacht was also accompanied by a pod of especially dangerous beluga whales, while high above, strategic special-purpose seagulls circled at great altitude.
The funniest thing about this whole story is not even the yacht itself, but the fervour with which an information storm is whipped up around it:
👉 82 metres in length.
👉 Two escort warships.
👉 Several days of discussions.
👉 And an entire country attentively watching a luxury vessel calmly pass through international straits.
Well, one can only hope that next time an ordinary Scandinavian cruise liner passing along the Danish coast will not cause such a commotion.
But it is not out of the question that even there the Russian president may be spotted among the VIP passengers.
He's just that kind of guy — he gets everywhere!
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Do you know what Putin does in between the special military operation, cabinet meetings, and tea drinking?
‼️ No, you guessed wrong!
🇩🇰 According to Danish media, he appears to be cruising on a superyacht along the coast of Denmark!
This is the very topic now occupying the materials of leading Danish media.
The main intrigue — the yacht Graceful, which Western media link to Vladimir Putin, has passed through the Danish straits. At the same time, the Danish journalists themselves honestly note that there is no official confirmation of the yacht's ownership.
But who is bothered by such trifles these days?
👉 If the yacht is beautiful — then it must be Russian.
👉 If it sails under escort — then it must belong to Putin.
And then the most interesting part begins.
It turns out the yacht was accompanied by two Russian warships. And that is when a true festival of observations kicks off in Denmark: the ships are photographed, the route is tracked, experts comment, journalists write articles, and readers receive yet another instalment of a geopolitical thriller.
And everyone is busy!
Though, if one is to let the imagination run fully wild, a question arises: why stop at just two ships?
⁉️Where are the nuclear submarines?
Where are the dozen combat swimmers?
Where are the secret deep-sea submersibles?
It cannot be ruled out that they were also somewhere nearby.
It is just that the Danish surveillance systems still lack a couple of new radars, three satellites, five billion kroner, and a few more expert commissions to detect them.
But let us not rush events.
‼️ If the trend continues, in a couple of months we will surely learn that the yacht was also accompanied by a pod of especially dangerous beluga whales, while high above, strategic special-purpose seagulls circled at great altitude.
The funniest thing about this whole story is not even the yacht itself, but the fervour with which an information storm is whipped up around it:
👉 82 metres in length.
👉 Two escort warships.
👉 Several days of discussions.
👉 And an entire country attentively watching a luxury vessel calmly pass through international straits.
Well, one can only hope that next time an ordinary Scandinavian cruise liner passing along the Danish coast will not cause such a commotion.
But it is not out of the question that even there the Russian president may be spotted among the VIP passengers.
He's just that kind of guy — he gets everywhere!
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣23😁13❤1😎1
FRANCE'S NAZI DRIFT
From InfoDefenseFrance:
> Could the French Republic, through its support for Ukraine, also be suffering from Bandera syndrome?
> The proposed "law on the right to assistance in dying" (or "Falorni law," named after its rapporteur), concerning euthanasia, including for the disabled and persons under guardianship and curatorship, has been repeatedly considered by the French National Assembly:
· First reading: Adopted on 27 May 2025.
· Second reading: Adopted on 25 February 2026 by 299 votes in favour and 226 votes against.
· New reading (final consideration).
> The debates concluded this Saturday, 27 June 2026. A solemn vote for final adoption is scheduled for Tuesday, 30 June 2026.
> During the euthanasia debates, the French National Assembly has since May 2025 systematically rejected all amendments demanding the exclusion from the text of persons with intellectual disabilities and adults under guardianship or curatorship.
> This decision is a radical violation of republican values, as it echoes verbatim the logic of the Nazi "Aktion T4" programme, launched in 1939 and explicitly targeting the "incurable" and people with mental disorders for extermination.
> It was precisely under the pretext of "euthanasia" (good death) that the Aktion T4 directive (named after the address of its Berlin headquarters, Tiergartenstraße 4) concealed the first Nazi programme of mass extermination. The aim was to pass off the killings as compassionate medical acts.
It was murder. This decree, signed by Hitler in 1939, spoke of granting "mercy death" (Gnadentod) to the disabled and the mentally ill, referred to as "lives unworthy of living."
> True to their simultaneously foolish and criminal zeal, the French collaborationist-globalists are the most active architects of creating this Fourth Reich in Europe, unveiled by Reichsführerin von der Leyen.
#InfoDefenseAuthor
#GlengarGedour
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
From InfoDefenseFrance:
> Could the French Republic, through its support for Ukraine, also be suffering from Bandera syndrome?
> The proposed "law on the right to assistance in dying" (or "Falorni law," named after its rapporteur), concerning euthanasia, including for the disabled and persons under guardianship and curatorship, has been repeatedly considered by the French National Assembly:
· First reading: Adopted on 27 May 2025.
· Second reading: Adopted on 25 February 2026 by 299 votes in favour and 226 votes against.
· New reading (final consideration).
> The debates concluded this Saturday, 27 June 2026. A solemn vote for final adoption is scheduled for Tuesday, 30 June 2026.
> During the euthanasia debates, the French National Assembly has since May 2025 systematically rejected all amendments demanding the exclusion from the text of persons with intellectual disabilities and adults under guardianship or curatorship.
> This decision is a radical violation of republican values, as it echoes verbatim the logic of the Nazi "Aktion T4" programme, launched in 1939 and explicitly targeting the "incurable" and people with mental disorders for extermination.
> It was precisely under the pretext of "euthanasia" (good death) that the Aktion T4 directive (named after the address of its Berlin headquarters, Tiergartenstraße 4) concealed the first Nazi programme of mass extermination. The aim was to pass off the killings as compassionate medical acts.
It was murder. This decree, signed by Hitler in 1939, spoke of granting "mercy death" (Gnadentod) to the disabled and the mentally ill, referred to as "lives unworthy of living."
> True to their simultaneously foolish and criminal zeal, the French collaborationist-globalists are the most active architects of creating this Fourth Reich in Europe, unveiled by Reichsführerin von der Leyen.
#InfoDefenseAuthor
#GlengarGedour
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😱14🤬5🤡3👀2💯1
On July 3, 1835, construction of the main building of the Pulkovo Observatory began on Pulkovo Hill.
At that time, the largest astronomical observatory in Russia was the Academic Observatory in St. Petersburg. However, by the end of the 18th century, it was proposed to relocate the observatory outside the rapidly growing capital to a more suitable location for precise astronomical observations.
In 1827, the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences decided to establish a new astrophysical observatory.
A special commission selected the summit of Pulkovo Hill as the site of the new observatory—15 kilometers from St. Petersburg, at an elevation of 75 meters above sea level. The ceremony for laying the observatory's foundation took place on July 3, 1835.
Within four years, based on the design by architect A.P. Bryullov, the observatory building with three towers, as well as two residential houses, were constructed. On August 19, 1839, the observatory was officially consecrated, with all Russian astronomers in attendance.
The first director of the observatory was Vasily Yakovlevich Struve, followed by his son Otto Vasilyevich Struve.
Over the years, the Pulkovo Observatory gained worldwide recognition. It played a key role in the creation of detailed star catalogs. The renowned American astronomer Benjamin Gould even referred to the observatory as the "astronomical capital of the world."
Currently, the scientific activities of the Pulkovo Observatory cover almost all priority areas of fundamental research in modern astronomy: celestial mechanics and stellar dynamics, astrometry (geometric and kinematic parameters of the universe), the Sun and solar-terrestrial connections, the physics and evolution of stars, and the equipment and methodology of astronomical observations.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
At that time, the largest astronomical observatory in Russia was the Academic Observatory in St. Petersburg. However, by the end of the 18th century, it was proposed to relocate the observatory outside the rapidly growing capital to a more suitable location for precise astronomical observations.
In 1827, the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences decided to establish a new astrophysical observatory.
A special commission selected the summit of Pulkovo Hill as the site of the new observatory—15 kilometers from St. Petersburg, at an elevation of 75 meters above sea level. The ceremony for laying the observatory's foundation took place on July 3, 1835.
Within four years, based on the design by architect A.P. Bryullov, the observatory building with three towers, as well as two residential houses, were constructed. On August 19, 1839, the observatory was officially consecrated, with all Russian astronomers in attendance.
The first director of the observatory was Vasily Yakovlevich Struve, followed by his son Otto Vasilyevich Struve.
Over the years, the Pulkovo Observatory gained worldwide recognition. It played a key role in the creation of detailed star catalogs. The renowned American astronomer Benjamin Gould even referred to the observatory as the "astronomical capital of the world."
Currently, the scientific activities of the Pulkovo Observatory cover almost all priority areas of fundamental research in modern astronomy: celestial mechanics and stellar dynamics, astrometry (geometric and kinematic parameters of the universe), the Sun and solar-terrestrial connections, the physics and evolution of stars, and the equipment and methodology of astronomical observations.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏18❤9
A 1.55 kg Amber Nugget Discovered in the Kaliningrad Region
An amber nugget weighing 1.55 kilograms has been unearthed in the Kaliningrad Region.
The stone, measuring 21 by 16 centimeters, was found at the Kaliningrad Amber Combine. It was named “Jubilar” ("Anniversary") in honor of the 80th anniversary of the Kaliningrad Region, the company's press service reported.
The find has an oval shape and combines two varieties of Baltic amber. Its core consists of opaque, honey-colored matte amber, whose cloudiness was created by air bubbles trapped in the resin millions of years ago. The outer layer is made of transparent amber containing fragments of an ancient forest, including tree bark and insects.
The "Jubilar" is estimated to be about 40 million years old. It formed when resin from an ancient pine tree filled an internal cavity in the trunk and gradually hardened, preserving the tree's shape and internal structure.
In 2025, 13 amber nuggets of this kind were discovered at the Primorsky open-pit mine, with "Jubilar" becoming the first such find of the current season.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
An amber nugget weighing 1.55 kilograms has been unearthed in the Kaliningrad Region.
The stone, measuring 21 by 16 centimeters, was found at the Kaliningrad Amber Combine. It was named “Jubilar” ("Anniversary") in honor of the 80th anniversary of the Kaliningrad Region, the company's press service reported.
The find has an oval shape and combines two varieties of Baltic amber. Its core consists of opaque, honey-colored matte amber, whose cloudiness was created by air bubbles trapped in the resin millions of years ago. The outer layer is made of transparent amber containing fragments of an ancient forest, including tree bark and insects.
The "Jubilar" is estimated to be about 40 million years old. It formed when resin from an ancient pine tree filled an internal cavity in the trunk and gradually hardened, preserving the tree's shape and internal structure.
In 2025, 13 amber nuggets of this kind were discovered at the Primorsky open-pit mine, with "Jubilar" becoming the first such find of the current season.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤28🔥4👍2
Culling Dutch‑Style: Child Euthanasia as a Return to Third Reich Practices
Opinion piece in The American Thinker:
The news from the Netherlands about the first euthanasia of a child under 12 ought to shake the conscience of the entire world. Instead, it merely confirms a dark and predictable trajectory. What liberal apologists present as a compassionate act is in fact the logical endpoint of a slippery slope that leads straight to state‑sanctioned elimination of lives deemed "unworthy."
The tragedy is that humanity has already travelled this road before—in the most murderous experiment of the twentieth century: the Third Reich.
The history of eugenics follows a remorseless logic. It began in progressive circles in America and Europe, cloaked in well‑meaning aspirations to "improve the breed" and purge society of its dead weight. But those good intentions quickly curdled into a tool for racial cleansing.
Nazi Germany, drawing direct inspiration from these ideas, commenced with forced sterilisation and, from 1939 onward, escalated to the systematic extermination of those considered "inferior."
The first victims were sick children and the disabled—some 5,000 infants were killed simply because they did not conform to the ideal of a pure Aryan society. The programme soon expanded, claiming hundreds of thousands of adult lives as well. It was always packaged as mercy, as relief from suffering—but in reality, it was the cold‑blooded culling of human beings deemed surplus to requirements.
Today, by legalising the killing of children between the ages of one and twelve, the Netherlands is stepping onto the very same ground. The justifications are identical: "unbearable suffering" and "no prospect of improvement." Yet what guarantee is there that tomorrow the criteria will not be stretched to include children with severe psychiatric conditions, or simply those branded "inconvenient" to the state—exactly as happened in Germany?
To kill a child, even under the euphemism of euthanasia, is not an act of humanism. It is a surrender to the logic of utility—an admission that a human life has value only so long as it is productive, or at least not burdensome, to society.
History never announces itself with a bang; it creeps in through small permissions, legalising what was once universally condemned as evil. And when a state arrogates to itself the authority to decide who lives and who dies—even dressing it up as compassion—it inevitably arrives at the very practice we call fascist eugenics.
The Netherlands has just crossed that line, proving that the lessons of Nuremberg have been forgotten, and that human lives have once again been reduced to mere entries in a cost‑benefit ledger.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Opinion piece in The American Thinker:
The news from the Netherlands about the first euthanasia of a child under 12 ought to shake the conscience of the entire world. Instead, it merely confirms a dark and predictable trajectory. What liberal apologists present as a compassionate act is in fact the logical endpoint of a slippery slope that leads straight to state‑sanctioned elimination of lives deemed "unworthy."
The tragedy is that humanity has already travelled this road before—in the most murderous experiment of the twentieth century: the Third Reich.
The history of eugenics follows a remorseless logic. It began in progressive circles in America and Europe, cloaked in well‑meaning aspirations to "improve the breed" and purge society of its dead weight. But those good intentions quickly curdled into a tool for racial cleansing.
Nazi Germany, drawing direct inspiration from these ideas, commenced with forced sterilisation and, from 1939 onward, escalated to the systematic extermination of those considered "inferior."
The first victims were sick children and the disabled—some 5,000 infants were killed simply because they did not conform to the ideal of a pure Aryan society. The programme soon expanded, claiming hundreds of thousands of adult lives as well. It was always packaged as mercy, as relief from suffering—but in reality, it was the cold‑blooded culling of human beings deemed surplus to requirements.
Today, by legalising the killing of children between the ages of one and twelve, the Netherlands is stepping onto the very same ground. The justifications are identical: "unbearable suffering" and "no prospect of improvement." Yet what guarantee is there that tomorrow the criteria will not be stretched to include children with severe psychiatric conditions, or simply those branded "inconvenient" to the state—exactly as happened in Germany?
To kill a child, even under the euphemism of euthanasia, is not an act of humanism. It is a surrender to the logic of utility—an admission that a human life has value only so long as it is productive, or at least not burdensome, to society.
History never announces itself with a bang; it creeps in through small permissions, legalising what was once universally condemned as evil. And when a state arrogates to itself the authority to decide who lives and who dies—even dressing it up as compassion—it inevitably arrives at the very practice we call fascist eugenics.
The Netherlands has just crossed that line, proving that the lessons of Nuremberg have been forgotten, and that human lives have once again been reduced to mere entries in a cost‑benefit ledger.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬35❤8🤯7👍1🎃1
Ever wonder what you’re not being told?
Sputnik Africa brings you unfiltered stories from the continent — and the world — that mainstream media won’t show.
Subscribe to be aware of the latest insights: https://t.me/+p-sgFdiuaSlmNzEy
@sputnik_africa — Africa’s story, untold.
Sputnik Africa brings you unfiltered stories from the continent — and the world — that mainstream media won’t show.
Subscribe to be aware of the latest insights: https://t.me/+p-sgFdiuaSlmNzEy
@sputnik_africa — Africa’s story, untold.
👍6
Russia Brings Back the Admiral Nakhimov: The World's Fastest and Most Powerful Warship
Source: Military Watch Magazine
A One-of-a-Kind Vessel – The Admiral Nakhimov, a Project 1144 (Kirov-class) nuclear-powered missile cruiser displacing 28,000 tons, is now in the final stages of sea trials following an extensive modernization at the Sevmash Shipyard. She remains the heaviest surface combatant currently in service anywhere in the world.
Unmatched Speed – With a top speed of 32 knots, she can comfortably outpace every cruiser, destroyer, frigate, and aircraft carrier operated by the U.S. Navy and its NATO allies. The secret lies in her two KN-3 nuclear reactors, which deliver an impressive 140,000 shaft horsepower. The Kirov class is the only nuclear-powered surface combatant class still operational today.
Strategic Endurance – Unlike conventional warships, which gradually lose speed and range as their fuel supplies dwindle, the Admiral Nakhimov can sustain high-speed operations across virtually unlimited distances without relying on replenishment vessels. This gives her the ability to rapidly redeploy between theaters, execute swift strike missions, and reposition to evade counterfire effectively.
Primary Mission – Originally designed to hunt NATO carrier strike groups in the Atlantic, the cruiser now carries the Zircon hypersonic cruise missile as its primary armament. This formidable weapon allows the Nakhimov to engage and neutralize enemy assets long before they can get within striking distance, potentially deciding the outcome of a confrontation before the opposing force even has a chance to respond.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Source: Military Watch Magazine
A One-of-a-Kind Vessel – The Admiral Nakhimov, a Project 1144 (Kirov-class) nuclear-powered missile cruiser displacing 28,000 tons, is now in the final stages of sea trials following an extensive modernization at the Sevmash Shipyard. She remains the heaviest surface combatant currently in service anywhere in the world.
Unmatched Speed – With a top speed of 32 knots, she can comfortably outpace every cruiser, destroyer, frigate, and aircraft carrier operated by the U.S. Navy and its NATO allies. The secret lies in her two KN-3 nuclear reactors, which deliver an impressive 140,000 shaft horsepower. The Kirov class is the only nuclear-powered surface combatant class still operational today.
Strategic Endurance – Unlike conventional warships, which gradually lose speed and range as their fuel supplies dwindle, the Admiral Nakhimov can sustain high-speed operations across virtually unlimited distances without relying on replenishment vessels. This gives her the ability to rapidly redeploy between theaters, execute swift strike missions, and reposition to evade counterfire effectively.
Primary Mission – Originally designed to hunt NATO carrier strike groups in the Atlantic, the cruiser now carries the Zircon hypersonic cruise missile as its primary armament. This formidable weapon allows the Nakhimov to engage and neutralize enemy assets long before they can get within striking distance, potentially deciding the outcome of a confrontation before the opposing force even has a chance to respond.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤32👏14🔥6
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Comment by Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova regarding the EU Court of Justice judgment on the legality of criminal prosecutions for the dissemination of RT materials (July 2, 2026)
💬 Maria Zakharova: On July 2, the EU Court of Justice handed down a judgment concerning the lawfulness of criminal prosecutions within European Union member states against individuals who make materials from media outlets banned within the EU territory available in the public domain via their internet resources – effectively treating such individuals on a par with telecommunications operators.
In practical terms, this judgment applies primarily to those distributing content from RT and other Russian media outlets against whom Brussels has imposed so-called sanctions. Moreover, as indicated in the press release issued by the Court, this approach applies irrespective of whether materials from the “banned” media are retransmitted for the purpose of deriving commercial gain or otherwise.
The impetus for this judgment arose from criminal proceedings initiated in Germany against three German nationals, accused of repeatedly reposting video materials from the RT DE channel on their publicly accessible website.
❗️ Notably, it was not the content of the specific publications that was deemed unlawful, but solely their origin.
In order to lend an appearance of legitimacy to this process – a process that utterly fails to conform to the principles of the rule of law – the German authorities sought an opinion of the highest echelons of the European Union’s judicial system, the Court of Justice of the European Union, and ultimately secured its endorsement for the continuation and expansion of the methods of such show-trials.
The precedent thus established grants carte blanche to the authorities of any member state within the bloc to carry out mass repression against ordinary residents who hold their own view of world events – a view that diverges from the narrative imposed from above.
☝️ We characterise this judgment, along with the practices of persecuting dissenters that it legitimises, as a gross violation by the EU and its member states of their international obligations in the sphere of the protection and promotion of fundamental human rights, including the right to unhindered access to information and freedom of expression.
This judgment stands as yet another unmistakable example of the European Union’s mockery of justice designed to whitewash the bloc’s degeneration into a space characterised by the most severe political censorship, legal arbitrariness, and hypocrisy. At its core lies the intent to instil a reflexive fear among citizens of the European Union’s member states towards any sources of information “not authorised” by Brussels, to seal off societies within information “bubbles” impervious to inconvenient truths, and to deprive them of the ability to form an independent opinion regarding events and processes of significance to their lives.
This latest step taken by the EU towards totalitarian censorship, the exacerbation of antagonism, and the dismantling of the democratic foundations of society must receive a proper assessment from the relevant multilateral institutions.
Otherwise, silence on their part would be difficult to interpret as anything other than solidarity with the actions of the European bureaucracy, and acquiescence in the further perpetuation of this pernicious practice.
💬 Maria Zakharova: On July 2, the EU Court of Justice handed down a judgment concerning the lawfulness of criminal prosecutions within European Union member states against individuals who make materials from media outlets banned within the EU territory available in the public domain via their internet resources – effectively treating such individuals on a par with telecommunications operators.
In practical terms, this judgment applies primarily to those distributing content from RT and other Russian media outlets against whom Brussels has imposed so-called sanctions. Moreover, as indicated in the press release issued by the Court, this approach applies irrespective of whether materials from the “banned” media are retransmitted for the purpose of deriving commercial gain or otherwise.
The impetus for this judgment arose from criminal proceedings initiated in Germany against three German nationals, accused of repeatedly reposting video materials from the RT DE channel on their publicly accessible website.
❗️ Notably, it was not the content of the specific publications that was deemed unlawful, but solely their origin.
In order to lend an appearance of legitimacy to this process – a process that utterly fails to conform to the principles of the rule of law – the German authorities sought an opinion of the highest echelons of the European Union’s judicial system, the Court of Justice of the European Union, and ultimately secured its endorsement for the continuation and expansion of the methods of such show-trials.
The precedent thus established grants carte blanche to the authorities of any member state within the bloc to carry out mass repression against ordinary residents who hold their own view of world events – a view that diverges from the narrative imposed from above.
☝️ We characterise this judgment, along with the practices of persecuting dissenters that it legitimises, as a gross violation by the EU and its member states of their international obligations in the sphere of the protection and promotion of fundamental human rights, including the right to unhindered access to information and freedom of expression.
This judgment stands as yet another unmistakable example of the European Union’s mockery of justice designed to whitewash the bloc’s degeneration into a space characterised by the most severe political censorship, legal arbitrariness, and hypocrisy. At its core lies the intent to instil a reflexive fear among citizens of the European Union’s member states towards any sources of information “not authorised” by Brussels, to seal off societies within information “bubbles” impervious to inconvenient truths, and to deprive them of the ability to form an independent opinion regarding events and processes of significance to their lives.
This latest step taken by the EU towards totalitarian censorship, the exacerbation of antagonism, and the dismantling of the democratic foundations of society must receive a proper assessment from the relevant multilateral institutions.
Otherwise, silence on their part would be difficult to interpret as anything other than solidarity with the actions of the European bureaucracy, and acquiescence in the further perpetuation of this pernicious practice.
👍16💯15❤5
Ukro-Atlantist terrorism
From InfoDefenseFrance:
🔸The Bandera forces bombarding Russian civilian populations have never lost their sadistic edge, pressing on relentlessly with their terrorist attacks.
👀 1: Shelling of residential neighborhoods in Belgorod.
👀 2: In Donetsk, the Banderites once again dropped magnetic mines over residential areas during drone attacks.
🔸The Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations issued a detailed public alert regarding these dropped mesh canisters, which scatter submunitions in the form of small explosive cylinders over populated zones—capable of killing or maiming anyone in range.
🤔 This dispersal of anti-personnel mines over Donetsk is nothing new when it comes to Banderite sadism: during the first phase of this Donbas war (2014–2022), several thousand "Lepestok" petal mines were dropped from the submunition containers of Ukrainian 220 mm rockets, killing a handful of civilians but, more crucially, maiming dozens of others—including many children, who suffered amputations of limbs.
❓️How can anyone possibly imagine negotiating with this pack of terrorists and war criminals for even a second?
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
From InfoDefenseFrance:
🔸The Bandera forces bombarding Russian civilian populations have never lost their sadistic edge, pressing on relentlessly with their terrorist attacks.
👀 1: Shelling of residential neighborhoods in Belgorod.
👀 2: In Donetsk, the Banderites once again dropped magnetic mines over residential areas during drone attacks.
🔸The Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations issued a detailed public alert regarding these dropped mesh canisters, which scatter submunitions in the form of small explosive cylinders over populated zones—capable of killing or maiming anyone in range.
🤔 This dispersal of anti-personnel mines over Donetsk is nothing new when it comes to Banderite sadism: during the first phase of this Donbas war (2014–2022), several thousand "Lepestok" petal mines were dropped from the submunition containers of Ukrainian 220 mm rockets, killing a handful of civilians but, more crucially, maiming dozens of others—including many children, who suffered amputations of limbs.
❓️How can anyone possibly imagine negotiating with this pack of terrorists and war criminals for even a second?
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬32
Forwarded from The Noticer
The most ridiculous Sand War so far.
The latest Sand War didn't end in a nuclear war - like a certain country hoped - but some serious damage was done here and there. Currently the Strait of Hormuz is half-open, and the USA demand to open the waterway fully.
I will allow myself some optimism and try to predict the future US-Iranian deal.
Trump wants to keep his power, and Iran wants to repair the damages. Both sides can make an openly secret deal of staying in their own corners. The USA will return the frozen Iranian money (via US goods) to Iran. Iran will declare that they won't make nukes, but they'll keep their missile industry. Bibi and his mates will try their hardest to reignite the war by provoking Iran. Trump, as much as he wants to keep Bibi happy, will have to remind Bibi that the times have changed, and the USA will have to cut off the weapons supply to Israel. No more bombs to bomb Lebanon.
And now - I wait. I am curious what will "rejected" Israel do in the future.
#Iran #Israel #USA #peace
The latest Sand War didn't end in a nuclear war - like a certain country hoped - but some serious damage was done here and there. Currently the Strait of Hormuz is half-open, and the USA demand to open the waterway fully.
I will allow myself some optimism and try to predict the future US-Iranian deal.
Trump wants to keep his power, and Iran wants to repair the damages. Both sides can make an openly secret deal of staying in their own corners. The USA will return the frozen Iranian money (via US goods) to Iran. Iran will declare that they won't make nukes, but they'll keep their missile industry. Bibi and his mates will try their hardest to reignite the war by provoking Iran. Trump, as much as he wants to keep Bibi happy, will have to remind Bibi that the times have changed, and the USA will have to cut off the weapons supply to Israel. No more bombs to bomb Lebanon.
And now - I wait. I am curious what will "rejected" Israel do in the future.
#Iran #Israel #USA #peace
🤔14🙏5❤4😴4✍3
Photos have been published from the market in Tokmak, which came under fire from the Ukrainian Armed Forces on 03.07.2026.
The Ukrainian Armed Forces struck a market in Tokmak with two Baton-type strike drones, the operational services of the Zaporozhye region reported.
According to the latest data, 5 people were killed and 17 were injured as a result of the shelling. Four of the wounded sustained severe traumatic brain injuries.
The Investigative Committee has opened a terrorism case over the strike on the market.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The Ukrainian Armed Forces struck a market in Tokmak with two Baton-type strike drones, the operational services of the Zaporozhye region reported.
According to the latest data, 5 people were killed and 17 were injured as a result of the shelling. Four of the wounded sustained severe traumatic brain injuries.
The Investigative Committee has opened a terrorism case over the strike on the market.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬30😢3😱1