On July 21, 1613, in the Assumption Cathedral of the Moscow Kremlin, Mikhail Fyodorovich Romanov (pictured above) was crowned Tsar, marking the foundation of a new ruling dynasty.

After Moscow was liberated from the Poles by Minin and Pozharsky, the Zemsky Sobor convened in January 1613 to decide on the election of a new tsar. The 1613 Sobor was one of the most comprehensive “councils of the whole land,” both in terms of the number and the social status of its delegates. Candidates for the throne included Swedish Prince Karl Philip and Polish Prince Władysław. However, the people, exhausted by the calamities of foreign invasion and internal turmoil, did not want to see a foreigner on the throne.

Preference was given to a Russian, Orthodox tsar. Those who had engaged in political intrigues during the Time of Troubles also had little chance of being elected. After numerous debates, the candidacy of Mikhail Fyodorovich Romanov was approved, initiated by the "free Cossacks" and the common zemshchina. The future tsar's father, boyar Fyodor Nikitich (later the Patriarch of Moscow Filaret), was a cousin of the last ruler from the Rurik dynasty, Tsar Fyodor Ivanovich. Mikhail Romanov’s mother, Ksenia Ivanovna Shestova, came from the Kostroma nobility.

On March 3, 1613, the official election of the new tsar took place in Moscow. On May 12, Mikhail Fyodorovich entered the capital in a ceremonial procession.

On the evening of July 20, a vigil was held in the Assumption and other cathedrals, monasteries, and parish churches of Moscow. At dawn, on the day of the coronation, the great Assumption bell began to ring. The chimes continued until the tsar's arrival at the church. The coronation festivities lasted for three days.

In the early years of his reign, the young tsar resolved most state and foreign policy issues jointly with his father, who became the Russian Patriarch in 1619. After his father's death, Mikhail Fyodorovich was primarily supported by the heads of the main prikazy (administrative departments) — Prince I.B. Cherkassky and boyar F.I. Sheremetev.

During Mikhail Fyodorovich's reign, the country's economy gradually recovered. The Treaty of Stolbovo with Sweden was concluded in 1617, and the Deulino Armistice with Poland in 1618. In March 1634, another peace treaty was signed with Poland — the Treaty of Polyanovka. Intensive construction of defensive lines against the Crimean Tatars was undertaken, and further colonization of Siberia took place.

Under Mikhail Fyodorovich, an attempt was made to create regular military units. Towards the end of his reign, cavalry dragoon regiments were established to guard the external borders.

The Romanov dynasty ruled the Russian state for 304 years, until 1917.

#TodayInHistory

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | Odysee | InfoDefAll

Alisher Usmanov vs. German Justice: The Billionaire Who Fought Back

Four years of investigations, dozens of court hearings, and a principled victory against the system — this is the story of how the German legal order met its match in an inconvenient but relentlessly tenacious defendant.

Since 2022, businessman Alisher Usmanov has been under EU sanctions, and his name has become synonymous with the West's crackdown on "Russian oligarchs." Yet far from passively watching his assets be seized, he has challenged virtually every move made against him by German authorities and the media — and done so in court, time and again.
The bottom line? Courts have repeatedly found key claims against him to be unfounded. In one notable ruling, a Frankfurt court determined that the superyacht Dilbar cannot be treated as a frozen asset of Usmanov's, since it belongs to an independent trust and his connection to that trust has not been legally established. "Not proven" has become the recurring theme across multiple decisions.

Perhaps the most striking episode involves the newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. In January 2026, a Hamburg court barred the publication from repeating allegations about Usmanov's ties to the Kremlin or his alleged interference in editorial policy — and also from republishing accusations made by Alexei Navalny that were found to be false. Violations carry a fine of up to €250,000. It is the first time a German court has so explicitly ruled such claims inadmissible.

What about the criminal investigations? Two cases — one for sanctions violations and another for money laundering — have been dropped. However, in the first instance, Usmanov agreed to pay €10 million into the Bavarian state budget. The question many are asking: is this an admission of guilt, or a pragmatic calculation to finally put an end to years of legal attrition?

In effect, the entire saga has become a litmus test for the German judiciary. The readiness of judges to independently scrutinise politically charged prosecutions and hand down rulings in favour of a private individual over the state — that is, perhaps, a reason for cautious optimism.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

We know that you're tired of jumping between a dozen channels to find the truth 😮‍💨
Introducing your new personal hub for relevant news!

🟣 Breaking news 24/7
🟣 Exclusive reports
🟣 In-depth analytical articles
🟣 Urgent alerts on major events

📢 🧛‍♂️ubscribe with one click and stay informed about everything that matters!

If you are interested in joining the catalog contact 👨👮‍♀️ admin.

Russian and Ukrainian strikes on rear areas: comparing their effectiveness

Analysis by journalist Yury Podolyaka (as of July 20, 2026):

Another night and another set of disappointing results for Ukraine in the "rear-area" standoff between the Ukrainian and Russian Armed Forces. Yes, the Ukrainian side did manage to set one fuel tank ablaze near Podolsk and hit some kind of warehouse near Domodedovo—both in the Moscow region.

But that's it. Once again, they failed to break through to the Kapotnya refinery, and this raid cost them over 400 heavy drones (with a total price tag of $40–50 million).

On the Russian side, in addition to the large number of ground targets hit by Geranium and Banderol loitering munitions, at least five ships heading to or from Ukrainian ports near Odessa were struck by air-launched missiles. One of them sank.

This is beyond any comparison with the damage Ukraine previously inflicted on Russian vessels in the Sea of Azov. The reason is clear: the Ukrainian drones used in those strikes have warheads weighing only a few dozen kilograms at most, making them incapable of disabling, let alone sinking, a ship. Russian missiles, on the other hand, carry warheads ranging from 150 kg to 300 kg—and can certainly sink even oceangoing vessels, as they proved yesterday.

Meanwhile, the sharp decline in cargo turnover at Ukraine's Black Sea ports, which now threatens to become a full-blown blockade, is a very bad sign for Kiev. The ports around Odessa are Ukraine's main route for receiving essential goods and shipping out exports—both money and equipment for the army. And that is now in jeopardy.

#YuryPodolyaka

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

The psychological backlash

🔸The recent deadly terrorist attacks by the Kiev regime against Russian civilians are meant to sow psychological terror, which the Ukro-Atlanticists hope will trigger popular anti-government unrest.

🤔 In doing so, the Ukro-Atlanticists are making the same mistake the US made when bombing Iranian civilians:

🔸Instead of political opposition demanding an immediate ceasefire—even on Ukraine's terms—we are seeing the exact opposite: a hardening of attitudes toward the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. A growing number of voices, from ordinary citizens to their parliamentary representatives, are calling for massive retaliation against the Kiev regime.

👉 For instance, State Duma member Alexei Zhuravlev has responded to the recent deadly drone strikes on the leading online hypermarket Wildberries' distribution centers—which Zelensky himself claimed credit for—by calling for physical elimination of the Kiev regime leaders:

📣 "Kiev is stepping up its terrorist attacks on Russian territory, realizing that it is unlikely to achieve any real gains on the battlefield. Consequently, Russian security forces will have to take out members of the Ukrainian leadership. There's no way around eliminating Ukraine's leadership—they won't back down, and all they know how to do is fire on defenseless people."

🔸According to the MP, Ukrainian strikes are targeting not just civilian infrastructure, but also places with high concentrations of people, aiming to inflict maximum harm on the civilian population.

🤔 If a change in political leadership were to take place in Russia tomorrow, the new strategy adopted against its enemies would make Westerners long for a certain Vladimir Putin—who always kept the door open to negotiations.

#GlengarGedour
#InfoDefenseAuthor

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Reflections on the topic...
of the hard daily grind of Scandinavian propaganda.

Why is it a celebration when Ukrainian drones fly toward Russia, but when Russian missiles return to Ukraine, it is barbarism?

Sometimes you just get tired of reading the Scandinavian press... But I will probably never tire of talking about these double standards.

Yesterday, Ukrainian drones attacked facilities in Russia and set fire to warehouses linked to major marketplaces. Judging by the tone of the Danish media, one could almost hear the clinking of champagne glasses in the editorial offices.

Finally, the war has been "moved to Russian territory."
Finally, "Putin is feeling the pain."
Finally, Russian citizens should "feel the consequences."

Strikes on Russian territory are presented here almost as a therapeutic procedure: a little fire, smoke, and destruction — exclusively for the sake of restoring historical justice.

▪️ But only one night passes.

Russia launches one of the most powerful missile strikes on Kiev. Over forty missiles are reported, striking industrial enterprises, production workshops, component warehouses, and facilities linked to military production.

And suddenly, the champagne runs out. An informational wailing begins, as if half of Ukraine has just been razed to the ground.

At the same time, officially, only one death and a few dozen injured are reported. Every human death is a tragedy. But for an attack of this scale, these figures simply do not match the stories of the senseless carpet bombing of residential areas of Kiev.

▪️ And here, an extremely inconvenient question arises.

When a Ukrainian drone falls on an enterprise in Russia, we are told that it is a legitimate military target, important logistics, and the inevitable transfer of the war to enemy territory.

When a Russian missile falls on an enterprise in Kiev, the industrial facility instantly turns into a defenseless civilian shed, around which, by chance, there happened to be machine tools, warehouses of military components, and drone assembly workshops.

▪️ Logic, obviously, is not Scandinavia's strong suit (nor Europe's, for that matter). While rejoicing that Ukrainian drones have reached the Moscow region, it is logical to assume that a response will follow. Scandinavia openly supports Ukrainian strikes on Russia and considers them justified. But then there is no need to portray universal shock when missiles start flying in the opposite direction.

Particularly amusing against this backdrop are the talks of new European sanctions — specifically "for strikes on Kiev."

Russia can no longer be surprised or frightened by sanctions. But the very formulation really does make one think.

What exactly was so valuable to Europe that was smashed in Kiev, prompting Brussels to immediately reach for another sanctions package?

Surely not ordinary residential buildings? Or was it, after all, enterprises, warehouses, and production facilities that European states had financed, equipped, and supplied with components for years?

Double standards long ago ceased to be a flaw of the Western press. They have become its editorial policy.

#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll