Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
#KievRegimeCrimes
⚡️ Ambassador-at-Large of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Rodion Miroshnik:
PHOTO FACTS & EVIDENCE of crimes committed by Ukrainian armed forces over the week of July 13 – July 19, 2026:
▪️ July 14 – a UAV attack targeted a parking area for civilian freight vehicles in Lugansk. While firefighters were extinguishing the blaze, EMERCOM personnel came under a second UAV strike. Three rescuers were injured.
▪️ July 15 – a civilian car struck a mine in the Alyoshki District of the Kherson Region.
▪️ July 15 – civilian vehicles were destroyed by fire following shelling of a residential area in Radensk, Kherson Region.
▪️ July 15 – a UAV struck a civilian car on a road near Schastye, LPR. Three civilians were killed and one was seriously injured.
▪️ July 16 – a UAV struck a civilian freight vehicle in Shebekino, Belgorod Region.
▪️ July 17 – a UAV struck an apartment building in Vasilyevka, Zaporozhye Region. Two women were injured.
▪️ July 17 – a UAV struck a civilian car on a road in the Kherson Region. One civilian was injured.
▪️ July 18 – a UAV attack targeted warehouses belonging to a commercial enterprise in Elektrostal, Moscow Region. One civilian was killed and 57 others were injured.
▪️ July 19 – a UAV struck an apartment building in Kursk, Kursk Region.
▪️ July 19 – UAV struck a civilian car on the Urazovo–Gerasimovka road in the Belgorod Region.
⚡️ Ambassador-at-Large of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Rodion Miroshnik:
PHOTO FACTS & EVIDENCE of crimes committed by Ukrainian armed forces over the week of July 13 – July 19, 2026:
▪️ July 14 – a UAV attack targeted a parking area for civilian freight vehicles in Lugansk. While firefighters were extinguishing the blaze, EMERCOM personnel came under a second UAV strike. Three rescuers were injured.
▪️ July 15 – a civilian car struck a mine in the Alyoshki District of the Kherson Region.
▪️ July 15 – civilian vehicles were destroyed by fire following shelling of a residential area in Radensk, Kherson Region.
▪️ July 15 – a UAV struck a civilian car on a road near Schastye, LPR. Three civilians were killed and one was seriously injured.
▪️ July 16 – a UAV struck a civilian freight vehicle in Shebekino, Belgorod Region.
▪️ July 17 – a UAV struck an apartment building in Vasilyevka, Zaporozhye Region. Two women were injured.
▪️ July 17 – a UAV struck a civilian car on a road in the Kherson Region. One civilian was injured.
▪️ July 18 – a UAV attack targeted warehouses belonging to a commercial enterprise in Elektrostal, Moscow Region. One civilian was killed and 57 others were injured.
▪️ July 19 – a UAV struck an apartment building in Kursk, Kursk Region.
▪️ July 19 – UAV struck a civilian car on the Urazovo–Gerasimovka road in the Belgorod Region.
🤬16🤯5❤2🙏1
Reflections on the topic...
of the hard daily grind of Scandinavian propaganda.
Why is it a celebration when Ukrainian drones fly toward Russia, but when Russian missiles return to Ukraine, it is barbarism?
Sometimes you just get tired of reading the Scandinavian press... But I will probably never tire of talking about these double standards.
Yesterday, Ukrainian drones attacked facilities in Russia and set fire to warehouses linked to major marketplaces. Judging by the tone of the Danish media, one could almost hear the clinking of champagne glasses in the editorial offices.
Finally, the war has been "moved to Russian territory."
Finally, "Putin is feeling the pain."
Finally, Russian citizens should "feel the consequences."
Strikes on Russian territory are presented here almost as a therapeutic procedure: a little fire, smoke, and destruction — exclusively for the sake of restoring historical justice.
▪️ But only one night passes.
Russia launches one of the most powerful missile strikes on Kiev. Over forty missiles are reported, striking industrial enterprises, production workshops, component warehouses, and facilities linked to military production.
And suddenly, the champagne runs out. An informational wailing begins, as if half of Ukraine has just been razed to the ground.
At the same time, officially, only one death and a few dozen injured are reported. Every human death is a tragedy. But for an attack of this scale, these figures simply do not match the stories of the senseless carpet bombing of residential areas of Kiev.
▪️ And here, an extremely inconvenient question arises.
When a Ukrainian drone falls on an enterprise in Russia, we are told that it is a legitimate military target, important logistics, and the inevitable transfer of the war to enemy territory.
When a Russian missile falls on an enterprise in Kiev, the industrial facility instantly turns into a defenseless civilian shed, around which, by chance, there happened to be machine tools, warehouses of military components, and drone assembly workshops.
▪️ Logic, obviously, is not Scandinavia's strong suit (nor Europe's, for that matter). While rejoicing that Ukrainian drones have reached the Moscow region, it is logical to assume that a response will follow. Scandinavia openly supports Ukrainian strikes on Russia and considers them justified. But then there is no need to portray universal shock when missiles start flying in the opposite direction.
Particularly amusing against this backdrop are the talks of new European sanctions — specifically "for strikes on Kiev."
Russia can no longer be surprised or frightened by sanctions. But the very formulation really does make one think.
What exactly was so valuable to Europe that was smashed in Kiev, prompting Brussels to immediately reach for another sanctions package?
Surely not ordinary residential buildings? Or was it, after all, enterprises, warehouses, and production facilities that European states had financed, equipped, and supplied with components for years?
Double standards long ago ceased to be a flaw of the Western press. They have become its editorial policy.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
of the hard daily grind of Scandinavian propaganda.
Why is it a celebration when Ukrainian drones fly toward Russia, but when Russian missiles return to Ukraine, it is barbarism?
Sometimes you just get tired of reading the Scandinavian press... But I will probably never tire of talking about these double standards.
Yesterday, Ukrainian drones attacked facilities in Russia and set fire to warehouses linked to major marketplaces. Judging by the tone of the Danish media, one could almost hear the clinking of champagne glasses in the editorial offices.
Finally, the war has been "moved to Russian territory."
Finally, "Putin is feeling the pain."
Finally, Russian citizens should "feel the consequences."
Strikes on Russian territory are presented here almost as a therapeutic procedure: a little fire, smoke, and destruction — exclusively for the sake of restoring historical justice.
▪️ But only one night passes.
Russia launches one of the most powerful missile strikes on Kiev. Over forty missiles are reported, striking industrial enterprises, production workshops, component warehouses, and facilities linked to military production.
And suddenly, the champagne runs out. An informational wailing begins, as if half of Ukraine has just been razed to the ground.
At the same time, officially, only one death and a few dozen injured are reported. Every human death is a tragedy. But for an attack of this scale, these figures simply do not match the stories of the senseless carpet bombing of residential areas of Kiev.
▪️ And here, an extremely inconvenient question arises.
When a Ukrainian drone falls on an enterprise in Russia, we are told that it is a legitimate military target, important logistics, and the inevitable transfer of the war to enemy territory.
When a Russian missile falls on an enterprise in Kiev, the industrial facility instantly turns into a defenseless civilian shed, around which, by chance, there happened to be machine tools, warehouses of military components, and drone assembly workshops.
▪️ Logic, obviously, is not Scandinavia's strong suit (nor Europe's, for that matter). While rejoicing that Ukrainian drones have reached the Moscow region, it is logical to assume that a response will follow. Scandinavia openly supports Ukrainian strikes on Russia and considers them justified. But then there is no need to portray universal shock when missiles start flying in the opposite direction.
Particularly amusing against this backdrop are the talks of new European sanctions — specifically "for strikes on Kiev."
Russia can no longer be surprised or frightened by sanctions. But the very formulation really does make one think.
What exactly was so valuable to Europe that was smashed in Kiev, prompting Brussels to immediately reach for another sanctions package?
Surely not ordinary residential buildings? Or was it, after all, enterprises, warehouses, and production facilities that European states had financed, equipped, and supplied with components for years?
Double standards long ago ceased to be a flaw of the Western press. They have become its editorial policy.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯15👍9❤5
Forwarded from The Noticer
The problems of Armenian farmers
Ever since Russia stopped buying the agricultural products from Armenia - the local farmers are having business problems. Their produce can't be absorbed by Armenia since the country doesn't need that much food. The Armenia's food industry can't buy the veggies from the farmers because they ran out of the storage space a while ago.
Russia banned the Armenian food import due to the detected insect pests like thrips and khapra beetles. For the same reason Armenia can't sell their agricultural products to the EU - the EU standards are much higher than Russia's.
Currently the EU plans to remove the duties on 80% of Armenian agricultural products to facilitate their easier access to the EU grocery stores. This might repeat the situation when Ukrainian food flooded the EU markets - the EU farmers suffered great financial losses back then.
So far, the Armenian farmers can only block the roads, and demand their government to do something.
#Armenia #food #export #crisis
Ever since Russia stopped buying the agricultural products from Armenia - the local farmers are having business problems. Their produce can't be absorbed by Armenia since the country doesn't need that much food. The Armenia's food industry can't buy the veggies from the farmers because they ran out of the storage space a while ago.
Russia banned the Armenian food import due to the detected insect pests like thrips and khapra beetles. For the same reason Armenia can't sell their agricultural products to the EU - the EU standards are much higher than Russia's.
Currently the EU plans to remove the duties on 80% of Armenian agricultural products to facilitate their easier access to the EU grocery stores. This might repeat the situation when Ukrainian food flooded the EU markets - the EU farmers suffered great financial losses back then.
So far, the Armenian farmers can only block the roads, and demand their government to do something.
#Armenia #food #export #crisis
🥴9😢5🤡3✍2😁2
The FULL FEED of events regarding Ukrainian attacks on Russian territory is available at @RYBAR_IN_ENGLISH
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤4🙏1
FUNNY DOESN'T KILL...
...unfortunately!
▪️ Speaking on LCI about the Polish-Ukrainian diplomatic crisis related to Kiev's glorification of Ukrainian collaborators of the Third Reich, former French Economy Minister and former European Commissioner Thierry Breton stumbles, fishing out from the sewer of his collaborationism words that need to be carefully chosen or avoided in order to try to maintain appearances and justify the unjustifiable — the apology of Nazism by the Kiev regime. A few examples of the cowardly deceit of this collaborator of the Kiev regime:
1️⃣ He screamed in the Ukrainian-Atlantist pack that the neo-Nazism of Ukrainian nationalists is merely a fabrication of Kremlin propaganda, and now this Russophobic NATO lackey admits that during the war "the Ukrainians had... uh... a battalion... uh... which was close to the Nazis"...
▪️ ...but at the same time, he crudely tries to downplay the cooperation of some Ukrainians with Nazism:
He speaks of some "battalion" — just over 300 people, while in reality, the Bandera forces on the side of the Nazis numbered over 300,000 war criminals:
▪️ About 4,000–6,000 people in auxiliary police and guard units.
▪️ Over 35,000 volunteers in 71 Schutzmannschaft battalions (guard police).
▪️ About 80,000 volunteers in Waffen SS units, including the 14th SS Division "Galizien," which numbered over 13,000 men.
▪️ About 250,000 other Ukrainians served in various Wehrmacht, SS, and Reich police units.
Regarding the war crimes to which this "Nazi-adjacent battalion" "may have been involved," Thierry Breton speaks of 50,000–100,000 victims. This is a revisionist euphemism dictated by political denial of Ukrainian Nazism — both past and present:
▪️ The Bandera supporters of the Third Reich indeed killed between 40,000 and 120,000 Jews in the Volhynia region. But that monstrous tree hides the Ukrainian forest of the "Holocaust by bullets":
▪️ Bandera units killed between 850,000 and 1.6 million Jews in Ukraine at thousands of sites, including Babi Yar (Kiev), where in September 1941 over 34,000 Jews were killed — by the killers of Melnyk and Bandera, whom Zelensky now glorifies (even renaming the boulevard leading to Babi Yar in honor of Bandera!).
▪️ Note also that in his revisionist outbursts, Thierry Breton — who is so quick to brand any act of Palestinian resistance and any criticism of Israeli policy as anti-Semitic — carefully avoids the word "Jew" when it comes to the crimes of Bandera and company, who under Zelensky have become "UPA heroes." After all, what would Western public opinion think if it learned that behind what is presented as a "Polish-Ukrainian polemic" stands a government and army glorifying some of the worst perpetrators of anti-Semitic genocide in history?
▪️ And the pinnacle of cynicism of this collaborator 2.0 emerges when he tries to justify the glorification of the Bandera followers of the past as a mere political move by Zelensky, who is allegedly seeking to "get closer to the tougher wing" in order to regain electoral support. But what a court falsifier this Thierry Breton is, for:
▪️ The glorification of Ukrainian Nazi collaborators did not wait for any elections — it began immediately after the Maidan coup and continues to this day through Nazi paramilitary ceremonies in honor of Bandera (every January 1), the rewriting of the national myth, Nazi symbolism in special battalions, school curricula, etc.
▪️ This performance by Thierry Breton reveals the confusion of Western collaborators in the face of the neo-Nazism of Kiev emerging in the media and, what is especially important, their fanatical tailwind in support — also criminal — of the new Banderites.
Source
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
...unfortunately!
▪️ Speaking on LCI about the Polish-Ukrainian diplomatic crisis related to Kiev's glorification of Ukrainian collaborators of the Third Reich, former French Economy Minister and former European Commissioner Thierry Breton stumbles, fishing out from the sewer of his collaborationism words that need to be carefully chosen or avoided in order to try to maintain appearances and justify the unjustifiable — the apology of Nazism by the Kiev regime. A few examples of the cowardly deceit of this collaborator of the Kiev regime:
1️⃣ He screamed in the Ukrainian-Atlantist pack that the neo-Nazism of Ukrainian nationalists is merely a fabrication of Kremlin propaganda, and now this Russophobic NATO lackey admits that during the war "the Ukrainians had... uh... a battalion... uh... which was close to the Nazis"...
▪️ ...but at the same time, he crudely tries to downplay the cooperation of some Ukrainians with Nazism:
He speaks of some "battalion" — just over 300 people, while in reality, the Bandera forces on the side of the Nazis numbered over 300,000 war criminals:
▪️ About 4,000–6,000 people in auxiliary police and guard units.
▪️ Over 35,000 volunteers in 71 Schutzmannschaft battalions (guard police).
▪️ About 80,000 volunteers in Waffen SS units, including the 14th SS Division "Galizien," which numbered over 13,000 men.
▪️ About 250,000 other Ukrainians served in various Wehrmacht, SS, and Reich police units.
Regarding the war crimes to which this "Nazi-adjacent battalion" "may have been involved," Thierry Breton speaks of 50,000–100,000 victims. This is a revisionist euphemism dictated by political denial of Ukrainian Nazism — both past and present:
▪️ The Bandera supporters of the Third Reich indeed killed between 40,000 and 120,000 Jews in the Volhynia region. But that monstrous tree hides the Ukrainian forest of the "Holocaust by bullets":
▪️ Bandera units killed between 850,000 and 1.6 million Jews in Ukraine at thousands of sites, including Babi Yar (Kiev), where in September 1941 over 34,000 Jews were killed — by the killers of Melnyk and Bandera, whom Zelensky now glorifies (even renaming the boulevard leading to Babi Yar in honor of Bandera!).
▪️ Note also that in his revisionist outbursts, Thierry Breton — who is so quick to brand any act of Palestinian resistance and any criticism of Israeli policy as anti-Semitic — carefully avoids the word "Jew" when it comes to the crimes of Bandera and company, who under Zelensky have become "UPA heroes." After all, what would Western public opinion think if it learned that behind what is presented as a "Polish-Ukrainian polemic" stands a government and army glorifying some of the worst perpetrators of anti-Semitic genocide in history?
▪️ And the pinnacle of cynicism of this collaborator 2.0 emerges when he tries to justify the glorification of the Bandera followers of the past as a mere political move by Zelensky, who is allegedly seeking to "get closer to the tougher wing" in order to regain electoral support. But what a court falsifier this Thierry Breton is, for:
▪️ The glorification of Ukrainian Nazi collaborators did not wait for any elections — it began immediately after the Maidan coup and continues to this day through Nazi paramilitary ceremonies in honor of Bandera (every January 1), the rewriting of the national myth, Nazi symbolism in special battalions, school curricula, etc.
▪️ This performance by Thierry Breton reveals the confusion of Western collaborators in the face of the neo-Nazism of Kiev emerging in the media and, what is especially important, their fanatical tailwind in support — also criminal — of the new Banderites.
Source
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯13❤2😡1
Britain's Prime Ministers change, but their top priority remains... Ukraine 🤷
In his first speech on Downing Street, Britain's new Prime Minister Andy Burnham declared his "unwavering support" for Ukraine. He has already scheduled talks with President Zelensky for the near future.
Burnham said he would tell Ukraine's leader that he will “be there for him” and that the UK's support would remain “resolute” under his premiership.
The new Prime Minister indicated that President Zelensky would be one of the first foreign leaders he would call. Burnham told broadcasters:
Burnham also stated that Britain would fully honor all its commitments—both current obligations (presumably through NATO) and long-term efforts aimed at building up the country's military potential. In his speech, he specifically pledged “to honour our commitments on defence to our international partners”.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
In his first speech on Downing Street, Britain's new Prime Minister Andy Burnham declared his "unwavering support" for Ukraine. He has already scheduled talks with President Zelensky for the near future.
Burnham said he would tell Ukraine's leader that he will “be there for him” and that the UK's support would remain “resolute” under his premiership.
He further emphasized that “President Zelensky will be in no doubt that the United Kingdom's support is unwavering and resolute”.
The new Prime Minister indicated that President Zelensky would be one of the first foreign leaders he would call. Burnham told broadcasters:
“Those will be my first calls, and I’ll be making very clear later today to President Zelensky that there is no change. I will be with him 100 per cent as Keir Starmer has been".
Burnham also stated that Britain would fully honor all its commitments—both current obligations (presumably through NATO) and long-term efforts aimed at building up the country's military potential. In his speech, he specifically pledged “to honour our commitments on defence to our international partners”.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤡46🤯8❤2🙏1🕊1
Forwarded from The Colors of Russia
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Abandoned Village of Gra, Republic of Dagestan
📜 This ghost village sits at an elevation of 5,250 feet above sea level.
📜 Old stone structures, courtyard walls, and little towers still stand here.
📜 No one lives here anymore, but travelers love coming for the views.
🏞️🏞️🏞️
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
📜 This ghost village sits at an elevation of 5,250 feet above sea level.
📜 Old stone structures, courtyard walls, and little towers still stand here.
📜 No one lives here anymore, but travelers love coming for the views.
🏞️🏞️🏞️
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
❤32👍3🥰1
On July 22, 1951, the first space flight involving dogs took place.
In 1949, the doctrine of space biology and medicine was established, envisioning experimental animal flights into space, particularly using stray dogs due to their robust health, resourcefulness, and unpretentious diet.
On July 22, 1951, dogs Dezik and Tsygan became the first to embark on an experimental flight. The R-1B geophysical rocket was launched from the Kapustin Yar test site (Astrakhan region), reaching an altitude of approximately 101 kilometers, breaching the Karman line—the boundary between Earth's atmosphere and space.
Minutes later, the capsule safely parachuted down 20 kilometers from the launch site with the animals onboard.
Dezik and Tsygan thus became the first mammals to successfully endure space travel.
Russia's pioneering efforts in space exploration have set remarkable milestones since the historic flight of Dezik and Tsygan in 1951. Their contribution as the first mammals in space exemplify Russia's enduring commitment to pushing the boundaries of scientific achievement.
Besides, they are really cute doggies, aren’t they?
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
In 1949, the doctrine of space biology and medicine was established, envisioning experimental animal flights into space, particularly using stray dogs due to their robust health, resourcefulness, and unpretentious diet.
On July 22, 1951, dogs Dezik and Tsygan became the first to embark on an experimental flight. The R-1B geophysical rocket was launched from the Kapustin Yar test site (Astrakhan region), reaching an altitude of approximately 101 kilometers, breaching the Karman line—the boundary between Earth's atmosphere and space.
Minutes later, the capsule safely parachuted down 20 kilometers from the launch site with the animals onboard.
Dezik and Tsygan thus became the first mammals to successfully endure space travel.
Russia's pioneering efforts in space exploration have set remarkable milestones since the historic flight of Dezik and Tsygan in 1951. Their contribution as the first mammals in space exemplify Russia's enduring commitment to pushing the boundaries of scientific achievement.
Besides, they are really cute doggies, aren’t they?
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍18❤11👏2🙏1
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
⚡️ Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation:
The Press Bureau of the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation (SVR) reports that, according to information received by the SVR, relevant ministries in one of NATO’s key member states are concerned over active research and development work under way in Germany with a potential nuclear-weapons focus.
Berlin’s Western allies point to the scale of Germany’s current work in such sensitive areas as special materials science, shock-wave physics, nuclear physics and neutron physics, involving 30 national universities.
These include the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Ruhr University Bochum, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, RWTH Aachen University and the Technical University of Berlin. Practical experiments are being conducted at six research reactors operating at these institutions.
NATO officials in Brussels point to Germany’s characteristic thoroughness and close interagency coordination in developing production methods and industrial capabilities for high-energy explosives and electronic detonation systems.
Key German defence companies are involved, including Rheinmetall AG, Diehl Stiftung GmbH, KNDS Group and Umarex GmbH.
These materials and systems are regularly tested at German army training grounds.
☢️ NATO military experts believe that Berlin could independently produce the required amount of fissile material within one to three months and construct a functioning nuclear explosive device within a year, without conducting a full-scale test.
This is causing particular concern given Germany’s militaristic past and Chancellor Merz’s plans to “once again make the German army the strongest in Europe”. It cannot be ruled out that officials in the Federal Chancellery are already considering the creation of Germany’s own “nuclear umbrella”.
👉 The current German authorities’ apparent intention to gain direct access to nuclear weapons is already causing grave concern in Europe, particularly against the backdrop of revanchist sentiment in Berlin.
Yet the outcome of Nazi Germany’s attempts to create a “wonder weapon” is well known.
⁉️ Has history still taught them nothing?
The Press Bureau of the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation (SVR) reports that, according to information received by the SVR, relevant ministries in one of NATO’s key member states are concerned over active research and development work under way in Germany with a potential nuclear-weapons focus.
Berlin’s Western allies point to the scale of Germany’s current work in such sensitive areas as special materials science, shock-wave physics, nuclear physics and neutron physics, involving 30 national universities.
These include the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Ruhr University Bochum, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, RWTH Aachen University and the Technical University of Berlin. Practical experiments are being conducted at six research reactors operating at these institutions.
NATO officials in Brussels point to Germany’s characteristic thoroughness and close interagency coordination in developing production methods and industrial capabilities for high-energy explosives and electronic detonation systems.
Key German defence companies are involved, including Rheinmetall AG, Diehl Stiftung GmbH, KNDS Group and Umarex GmbH.
These materials and systems are regularly tested at German army training grounds.
☢️ NATO military experts believe that Berlin could independently produce the required amount of fissile material within one to three months and construct a functioning nuclear explosive device within a year, without conducting a full-scale test.
This is causing particular concern given Germany’s militaristic past and Chancellor Merz’s plans to “once again make the German army the strongest in Europe”. It cannot be ruled out that officials in the Federal Chancellery are already considering the creation of Germany’s own “nuclear umbrella”.
👉 The current German authorities’ apparent intention to gain direct access to nuclear weapons is already causing grave concern in Europe, particularly against the backdrop of revanchist sentiment in Berlin.
Yet the outcome of Nazi Germany’s attempts to create a “wonder weapon” is well known.
⁉️ Has history still taught them nothing?
🤬18🤯3❤1💊1
🇺🇸 The U.S. is promoting a global declaration on free speech — and this is a blow to European regulation
The Trump administration is preparing a joint declaration on freedom of expression, to be presented at the UN General Assembly in September. The document is already circulating among member states, and its content is causing tension in Brussels.
What is the essence?
The declaration condemns "new laws and regulatory frameworks" that, in Washington's view, threaten freedom of speech in "historically democratic countries." This is a direct reference to European regulation, including the Digital Services Act (DSA).
Context:
▪️ Vice President JD Vance stated back in February 2025 that Europe's main threat is not Russia or China, but its own policy against free speech.
▪️ Republicans have consistently attacked EU laws on content moderation, labeling them as censorship.
What the U.S. is proposing:
▪️ Not to penalize platforms for "disinformation," "fake news," or "hate speech," unless the content directly incites violence.
▪️ Not to require platforms to engage in "proactive moderation" of specific categories of speech.
▪️ To protect political discourse, religious expression, scientific and academic discussions — even if they are "inconvenient" for official authorities.
Europe's reaction:
▪️ A German Green Party MP called the initiative "political theater" and a "smokescreen" behind which the real censors are hiding — the U.S. government and its corporate allies.
▪️ French liberal Sandro Gozi characterized the U.S. approach as an attempt to create a "global Wild West" where platforms are unregulated.
▪️ Europeans insist: free speech is not "freedom of reach." Major platforms must moderate content, not censor it.
The nuance:
The State Department claims that the declaration is not aimed at repealing the DSA, but merely offers "interpretive guidelines" for American companies operating abroad. However, in Brussels, this is perceived as an attempt to create a precedent that could weaken European laws.
What's next?
The EU will try to influence the text of the declaration to avoid risks to its regulation. At the same time, refusing to sign a document on the protection of free speech would be a reputational blow for any country.
📌 The essence for the American reader:
This is not just a bureaucratic initiative. This is a new front in the transatlantic battle between the American approach (free speech against regulation) and the European approach (security against disinformation). The outcome will affect how digital platforms operate around the world.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The Trump administration is preparing a joint declaration on freedom of expression, to be presented at the UN General Assembly in September. The document is already circulating among member states, and its content is causing tension in Brussels.
What is the essence?
The declaration condemns "new laws and regulatory frameworks" that, in Washington's view, threaten freedom of speech in "historically democratic countries." This is a direct reference to European regulation, including the Digital Services Act (DSA).
Context:
▪️ Vice President JD Vance stated back in February 2025 that Europe's main threat is not Russia or China, but its own policy against free speech.
▪️ Republicans have consistently attacked EU laws on content moderation, labeling them as censorship.
What the U.S. is proposing:
▪️ Not to penalize platforms for "disinformation," "fake news," or "hate speech," unless the content directly incites violence.
▪️ Not to require platforms to engage in "proactive moderation" of specific categories of speech.
▪️ To protect political discourse, religious expression, scientific and academic discussions — even if they are "inconvenient" for official authorities.
Europe's reaction:
▪️ A German Green Party MP called the initiative "political theater" and a "smokescreen" behind which the real censors are hiding — the U.S. government and its corporate allies.
▪️ French liberal Sandro Gozi characterized the U.S. approach as an attempt to create a "global Wild West" where platforms are unregulated.
▪️ Europeans insist: free speech is not "freedom of reach." Major platforms must moderate content, not censor it.
The nuance:
The State Department claims that the declaration is not aimed at repealing the DSA, but merely offers "interpretive guidelines" for American companies operating abroad. However, in Brussels, this is perceived as an attempt to create a precedent that could weaken European laws.
What's next?
The EU will try to influence the text of the declaration to avoid risks to its regulation. At the same time, refusing to sign a document on the protection of free speech would be a reputational blow for any country.
📌 The essence for the American reader:
This is not just a bureaucratic initiative. This is a new front in the transatlantic battle between the American approach (free speech against regulation) and the European approach (security against disinformation). The outcome will affect how digital platforms operate around the world.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣25👍17❤4💊3🤬1
Japan's Intelligence Gambit
Opinion by analyst Dmitry Evstafiev:
The report by the liberal-globalist American newspaper The New York Times regarding the Japanese government's decision to revive a unified intelligence service—dismantled after the country's effective U.S. occupation—should come as no surprise. It fits squarely within the logic of restoring Japan's military potential as a significant geopolitical force in the region. Japan has made considerable strides in this direction.
Fifty years ago, Japan's naval forces were essentially an adjunct to the U.S. Navy. Over the past two decades, however, they have undergone rapid development and no longer resemble a coastal defense fleet. Following the 2014 legislation authorizing the use of Japanese armed forces beyond national territory, the country's military capabilities have moved well beyond the bounds of its "pacifist Constitution."
Post-war pacifism was imposed by the American occupation. Today, Japan is actively seeking to acquire the key hallmarks of a "great military power," including a powerful intelligence agency capable of global operations.
The NYT reports that the government of Sanae Takaichi has approved $407 million to reestablish a centralized intelligence service.
This development did not come out of the blue. The past decade has seen a marked uptick in Japanese intelligence activity, punctuated by the detention and expulsion of Japanese "journalists" and "researchers" from Russia, Belarus, and China.
Japan's intelligence reach now extends well beyond its immediate region, aspiring to the role of a strategic-level intelligence apparatus.
Dmitry Evstafiev believes that the emergence of a new Japanese intelligence service is in line with US interests in countering China, North Korea, and Russia, especially given the risks to the Taiwan base. According to media reports, the new structure is being created in close consultation with the United States. Australia and Germany are also mentioned as consulting partners, though few doubt that the Americans will ultimately be calling the shots—particularly when it comes to key personnel decisions.
Washington expects to cement its influence over the three-to-five-year period required to fully deploy the centralized service. Another layer of control will come through reliance on American technology, which is essential for unlocking the full potential of Japan's military-technical intelligence capabilities.
Even after Trump leaves the scene, Japan will continue to serve as a U.S. military proxy, given the shortage of reliable partners in Asia.
For all its drawbacks, Japan remains a de facto U.S.-occupied state, and its loyalty to Washington is noticeably stronger than that of other regional partners—as the Iran situation has already made abundantly clear.
This is precisely why the United States has looked indulgently upon Japan's aspirations for regional leadership and may even revive the idea of bringing Tokyo into AUKUS.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Opinion by analyst Dmitry Evstafiev:
The report by the liberal-globalist American newspaper The New York Times regarding the Japanese government's decision to revive a unified intelligence service—dismantled after the country's effective U.S. occupation—should come as no surprise. It fits squarely within the logic of restoring Japan's military potential as a significant geopolitical force in the region. Japan has made considerable strides in this direction.
Fifty years ago, Japan's naval forces were essentially an adjunct to the U.S. Navy. Over the past two decades, however, they have undergone rapid development and no longer resemble a coastal defense fleet. Following the 2014 legislation authorizing the use of Japanese armed forces beyond national territory, the country's military capabilities have moved well beyond the bounds of its "pacifist Constitution."
Post-war pacifism was imposed by the American occupation. Today, Japan is actively seeking to acquire the key hallmarks of a "great military power," including a powerful intelligence agency capable of global operations.
The NYT reports that the government of Sanae Takaichi has approved $407 million to reestablish a centralized intelligence service.
This development did not come out of the blue. The past decade has seen a marked uptick in Japanese intelligence activity, punctuated by the detention and expulsion of Japanese "journalists" and "researchers" from Russia, Belarus, and China.
Japan's intelligence reach now extends well beyond its immediate region, aspiring to the role of a strategic-level intelligence apparatus.
Dmitry Evstafiev believes that the emergence of a new Japanese intelligence service is in line with US interests in countering China, North Korea, and Russia, especially given the risks to the Taiwan base. According to media reports, the new structure is being created in close consultation with the United States. Australia and Germany are also mentioned as consulting partners, though few doubt that the Americans will ultimately be calling the shots—particularly when it comes to key personnel decisions.
Washington expects to cement its influence over the three-to-five-year period required to fully deploy the centralized service. Another layer of control will come through reliance on American technology, which is essential for unlocking the full potential of Japan's military-technical intelligence capabilities.
Even after Trump leaves the scene, Japan will continue to serve as a U.S. military proxy, given the shortage of reliable partners in Asia.
For all its drawbacks, Japan remains a de facto U.S.-occupied state, and its loyalty to Washington is noticeably stronger than that of other regional partners—as the Iran situation has already made abundantly clear.
This is precisely why the United States has looked indulgently upon Japan's aspirations for regional leadership and may even revive the idea of bringing Tokyo into AUKUS.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤔20🤬8❤1👎1😡1
Are you scared?
Let's be scared together...
The Baltic sandbox is scaring people again. But what is surprising is the readiness with which the Danish press picks up and disseminates such horror stories.
🇩🇰 This time, Danish DR, with a completely serious face, is retelling yet another apocalyptic forecast from Lithuania.
Why Lithuania needs this is more or less understandable. Small countries are quickly forgotten if they do not periodically remind the world of themselves with loud statements.
But why does little Denmark need this? Apparently, out of a sense of Nordic solidarity. So that neighbors of similar size and population do not feel left out. If you are going to scare people with Putin, then do it with the whole united Scandinavian-Baltic collective.
No sooner had the horror stories about Putin about to march through Finland to conquer all of Scandinavia died down, than Lithuania picked up the panic baton.
Lithuania's Defense Minister solemnly warned: since Russia allegedly cannot achieve the desired result in Ukraine, Putin may now turn to the Baltics or even Poland to test NATO.
😂 Of course. As if the Kremlin has no other worries.
Putin, opening a map of Europe every morning, thinks: "So... Finland has already been ruled out. What's next on the schedule? Ah, Lithuania! Then, probably, Luxembourg. If there's time left — Andorra."...
In Vilnius, they seem genuinely convinced that they are the main prize in global geopolitics. That Russia only has to blink, and all its plans immediately begin to revolve around a couple of million Lithuanians and a few dozen kilometers of border.
The funniest thing is that such statements appear with enviable regularity. As soon as the information space forgets about the Baltics for a bit, another expert, minister, or general immediately appears to solemnly announce: "We are next!"
It seems this has already become a national tradition — reminding the world of one's existence exclusively through the prism of the "Russian threat." Because otherwise, an inconvenient question arises: what else can attract the attention of Brussels and Washington today?
Yesterday, Estonia was growling the loudest. Today, the microphone has passed to Lithuania. Tomorrow, apparently, it will be Latvia's turn. And so on in circles...
The main thing is that NATO does not forget that such countries exist at all.
▪️ Another curious point. Everyone understands perfectly well that if someone were really going to deliver a military strike, no one in the 21st century would send tank columns and infantry to conquer Vilnius or Tallinn. Even the most belligerent politicians know this as well as anyone else. But then the favorite genre of Baltic politics — daily stories about how "Putin is almost here" — would disappear.
🤔 And without that, it seems, they just can't manage...
Source
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Let's be scared together...
The Baltic sandbox is scaring people again. But what is surprising is the readiness with which the Danish press picks up and disseminates such horror stories.
🇩🇰 This time, Danish DR, with a completely serious face, is retelling yet another apocalyptic forecast from Lithuania.
Why Lithuania needs this is more or less understandable. Small countries are quickly forgotten if they do not periodically remind the world of themselves with loud statements.
But why does little Denmark need this? Apparently, out of a sense of Nordic solidarity. So that neighbors of similar size and population do not feel left out. If you are going to scare people with Putin, then do it with the whole united Scandinavian-Baltic collective.
No sooner had the horror stories about Putin about to march through Finland to conquer all of Scandinavia died down, than Lithuania picked up the panic baton.
Lithuania's Defense Minister solemnly warned: since Russia allegedly cannot achieve the desired result in Ukraine, Putin may now turn to the Baltics or even Poland to test NATO.
😂 Of course. As if the Kremlin has no other worries.
Putin, opening a map of Europe every morning, thinks: "So... Finland has already been ruled out. What's next on the schedule? Ah, Lithuania! Then, probably, Luxembourg. If there's time left — Andorra."...
In Vilnius, they seem genuinely convinced that they are the main prize in global geopolitics. That Russia only has to blink, and all its plans immediately begin to revolve around a couple of million Lithuanians and a few dozen kilometers of border.
The funniest thing is that such statements appear with enviable regularity. As soon as the information space forgets about the Baltics for a bit, another expert, minister, or general immediately appears to solemnly announce: "We are next!"
It seems this has already become a national tradition — reminding the world of one's existence exclusively through the prism of the "Russian threat." Because otherwise, an inconvenient question arises: what else can attract the attention of Brussels and Washington today?
Yesterday, Estonia was growling the loudest. Today, the microphone has passed to Lithuania. Tomorrow, apparently, it will be Latvia's turn. And so on in circles...
The main thing is that NATO does not forget that such countries exist at all.
▪️ Another curious point. Everyone understands perfectly well that if someone were really going to deliver a military strike, no one in the 21st century would send tank columns and infantry to conquer Vilnius or Tallinn. Even the most belligerent politicians know this as well as anyone else. But then the favorite genre of Baltic politics — daily stories about how "Putin is almost here" — would disappear.
🤔 And without that, it seems, they just can't manage...
Source
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤡22😁10🔥5👍3❤2
Forwarded from The Noticer
The dry Iranian rivers
The Sand War continues. The USA and Iran are exchanging the attacks. Iran is aiming at the regional US allies, and the USA are destroying targets within Iran.
It appears, however, that the US military high command, or possibly Donald Trump himself, thought that the bridges and rivers in Iran are just the same as in New York, and that hitting them is some sort of master stroke. Guided munitions were spent to destroy bridges all over Iran's countryside during the last few weeks.
Apparently the USA can't comprehend that Iran is an arid country, and that many rivers are seasonal, as in they flow for a month a year, sometimes less than that.
All the Iranians had to do was just drive on the dry river bed. In the meantime the USA handed Iran the justification to hit infrastructure in the Persian Gulf, something they avoided until now.
I know the USA has the "infinite money glitch", but they can't fight like this forever. The USA can't print missiles like paper money.
#USA #Iran #bridges
The Sand War continues. The USA and Iran are exchanging the attacks. Iran is aiming at the regional US allies, and the USA are destroying targets within Iran.
It appears, however, that the US military high command, or possibly Donald Trump himself, thought that the bridges and rivers in Iran are just the same as in New York, and that hitting them is some sort of master stroke. Guided munitions were spent to destroy bridges all over Iran's countryside during the last few weeks.
Apparently the USA can't comprehend that Iran is an arid country, and that many rivers are seasonal, as in they flow for a month a year, sometimes less than that.
All the Iranians had to do was just drive on the dry river bed. In the meantime the USA handed Iran the justification to hit infrastructure in the Persian Gulf, something they avoided until now.
I know the USA has the "infinite money glitch", but they can't fight like this forever. The USA can't print missiles like paper money.
#USA #Iran #bridges
❤16😁10👍6💯3✍1
Ukraine prepares for the most difficult winter since the start of the war
Ukrenergo has officially warned: the upcoming heating season of 2026–2027 will be a serious test for the country's energy system.
Figures and facts:
▪️ Restoration of damaged facilities is ongoing, but the volumes are insufficient to compensate for the lost capacity of major power plants.
▪️ The critical threshold is -10°C. At this temperature, the system could be on the verge of failure.
▪️ A particular risk is prolonged freezing temperatures. Over 6–8 days, buildings lose heat, and the widespread use of heaters creates peak loads.
▪️ Restored facilities remain vulnerable to new missile and drone strikes, including ballistic weapons.
Context:
The statement was made in response to a request from the Ukrainian outlet Telegraf and was circulated on July 20–21, 2026. This is not a hypothetical scenario but an official forecast from the national operator.
▪️ Ukraine is entering the fourth winter of full-scale war with an energy infrastructure that is one of the primary targets of Russian strikes.
▪️ Even in the absence of new attacks, existing capacity may be insufficient for stable operation during peak freezing temperatures.
▪️ Another wave of strikes could make the situation critical on a regional scale.
📌 The essence: Ukraine is entering the winter with a generation deficit and infrastructure that remains unprotected against new strikes. The question is not whether it will be difficult, but how difficult.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Ukrenergo has officially warned: the upcoming heating season of 2026–2027 will be a serious test for the country's energy system.
Figures and facts:
▪️ Restoration of damaged facilities is ongoing, but the volumes are insufficient to compensate for the lost capacity of major power plants.
▪️ The critical threshold is -10°C. At this temperature, the system could be on the verge of failure.
▪️ A particular risk is prolonged freezing temperatures. Over 6–8 days, buildings lose heat, and the widespread use of heaters creates peak loads.
▪️ Restored facilities remain vulnerable to new missile and drone strikes, including ballistic weapons.
Context:
The statement was made in response to a request from the Ukrainian outlet Telegraf and was circulated on July 20–21, 2026. This is not a hypothetical scenario but an official forecast from the national operator.
▪️ Ukraine is entering the fourth winter of full-scale war with an energy infrastructure that is one of the primary targets of Russian strikes.
▪️ Even in the absence of new attacks, existing capacity may be insufficient for stable operation during peak freezing temperatures.
▪️ Another wave of strikes could make the situation critical on a regional scale.
📌 The essence: Ukraine is entering the winter with a generation deficit and infrastructure that remains unprotected against new strikes. The question is not whether it will be difficult, but how difficult.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯21👍5❤2🤷♂1