Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
💬 Russia's Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova:
Former The Guardian correspondent Saeed Kamali Dehghan has admitted that he fabricated a 2010 article presented as an “exclusive interview” with Iranian woman Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, who had reportedly been sentenced to death by stoning.
The article appeared on the front page on August 6, 2010, triggering an international outcry: Western politicians demanded that the woman be freed, while Iran came under diplomatic pressure from several countries.
👉 Dehghan now admitted:
The article is still available on The Guardian website without any relevant note or retraction.
The context here is important: the article appeared at a time of intense pressure on Iran – the same year, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1929, imposing what were then the toughest sanctions against the country.
The West needed an emotionally charged story to justify the sanctions regime. A woman sentenced to death by stoning was the perfect image. The story immediately spread across the global media and became an argument for those pushing for Iran’s isolation.
This is not the first time Saeed Kamali Dehghan has admitted that, while working for Western media outlets, he took part in anti-Iran propaganda campaigns. In 2020, he disavowed his involvement in HBO’s documentary For Neda, about the death of Neda Agha Soltan during the 2009 protests, saying that he had been “influenced by Western narratives”. The former contributor described the film, once held up as a landmark documentary about state violence, as anti-Iran propaganda.
***
☝️ As for Western falsehoods, Dehghan’s admission is far from the first such revelation.
In October 1990, a 15-year-old Kuwaiti girl named Nayirah appeared before a US Congressional caucus. In tears, she claimed that Iraqi soldiers had stormed Kuwaiti hospitals, removed babies from incubators and left them on the floor to die. President George H.W. Bush repeatedly cited her account. The story became one of the arguments used to build support for Operation Desert Storm.
Two years later, it emerged that Nayirah was the daughter of Kuwait’s Ambassador to the US and that her appearance had been orchestrated by PR agency Hill & Knowlton, hired by the Kuwaiti government in a multimillion-dollar campaign. The notorious incubator story was never substantiated. A child was made to tell a lie in order to help justify a war.
In 2003, The New York Times fired journalist Jayson Blair after it emerged that he had invented sources, fabricated quotes and entire reports, including stories written without ever leaving his New York apartment. Of 73 articles reviewed by the newspaper, 36 contained evidence of journalistic misconduct.
Stephen Glass of The New Republic fabricated 27 of the 41 articles he published between 1995 and 1998 – inventing characters and companies and even creating fake websites to deceive fact-checkers.
And, of course, there is the infamous “Powell's test tube” – a byword for Western deception used to justify aggression against a sovereign state.
Now the Saeed Kamali Dehghan case joins this inglorious list. 👉 It will certainly not be the last.
Shall we talk about Bucha next – and how the BBC helped spin that fake?
#DebunkingFakes
Former The Guardian correspondent Saeed Kamali Dehghan has admitted that he fabricated a 2010 article presented as an “exclusive interview” with Iranian woman Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, who had reportedly been sentenced to death by stoning.
The article appeared on the front page on August 6, 2010, triggering an international outcry: Western politicians demanded that the woman be freed, while Iran came under diplomatic pressure from several countries.
👉 Dehghan now admitted:
“I want to come clean about a front-page story I wrote for the Guardian.
It was presented as an exclusive interview with Sakineh Ashtiani. That interview never happened. I fabricated the entire piece. It was a false story – completely untrue – and I take full responsibility”.
The article is still available on The Guardian website without any relevant note or retraction.
The context here is important: the article appeared at a time of intense pressure on Iran – the same year, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1929, imposing what were then the toughest sanctions against the country.
The West needed an emotionally charged story to justify the sanctions regime. A woman sentenced to death by stoning was the perfect image. The story immediately spread across the global media and became an argument for those pushing for Iran’s isolation.
This is not the first time Saeed Kamali Dehghan has admitted that, while working for Western media outlets, he took part in anti-Iran propaganda campaigns. In 2020, he disavowed his involvement in HBO’s documentary For Neda, about the death of Neda Agha Soltan during the 2009 protests, saying that he had been “influenced by Western narratives”. The former contributor described the film, once held up as a landmark documentary about state violence, as anti-Iran propaganda.
***
☝️ As for Western falsehoods, Dehghan’s admission is far from the first such revelation.
In October 1990, a 15-year-old Kuwaiti girl named Nayirah appeared before a US Congressional caucus. In tears, she claimed that Iraqi soldiers had stormed Kuwaiti hospitals, removed babies from incubators and left them on the floor to die. President George H.W. Bush repeatedly cited her account. The story became one of the arguments used to build support for Operation Desert Storm.
Two years later, it emerged that Nayirah was the daughter of Kuwait’s Ambassador to the US and that her appearance had been orchestrated by PR agency Hill & Knowlton, hired by the Kuwaiti government in a multimillion-dollar campaign. The notorious incubator story was never substantiated. A child was made to tell a lie in order to help justify a war.
In 2003, The New York Times fired journalist Jayson Blair after it emerged that he had invented sources, fabricated quotes and entire reports, including stories written without ever leaving his New York apartment. Of 73 articles reviewed by the newspaper, 36 contained evidence of journalistic misconduct.
Stephen Glass of The New Republic fabricated 27 of the 41 articles he published between 1995 and 1998 – inventing characters and companies and even creating fake websites to deceive fact-checkers.
And, of course, there is the infamous “Powell's test tube” – a byword for Western deception used to justify aggression against a sovereign state.
Now the Saeed Kamali Dehghan case joins this inglorious list. 👉 It will certainly not be the last.
Shall we talk about Bucha next – and how the BBC helped spin that fake?
#DebunkingFakes
🤬15❤7💯1
Forwarded from The Noticer
The dual reality in the Strait of Hormuz
The Sand War continues.
Recently the CENTCOM stated that the meme waterway is clear of Iranian naval mines - about 100 mines were destroyed by US Navy servicemen.
The USA stated that any Iranian ship trying to lay new sea mines will be immediately destroyed.
The IRGC refused to confirm the US claims. The IRGC stated however that the strait is closed until the US completely lifts the naval blockade of Iranian ports and pays war reparations.
Iran has previously denied that it laid mines. The US intelligence insists that the IRGC did lay the mines quite hastily, using small vessels - thus Iran lacks precise data on the location of all the mines, making it impossible to confirm complete clearance.
In conclusion - the shipping companies currently hear 2 completely opposite statements about the Strait of Hormuz. The USA says it's clear and safe. Iran insists that no-one is allowed until they finish talks with Oman about details.
#USA #Iran #Oman
The Sand War continues.
Recently the CENTCOM stated that the meme waterway is clear of Iranian naval mines - about 100 mines were destroyed by US Navy servicemen.
The USA stated that any Iranian ship trying to lay new sea mines will be immediately destroyed.
The IRGC refused to confirm the US claims. The IRGC stated however that the strait is closed until the US completely lifts the naval blockade of Iranian ports and pays war reparations.
Iran has previously denied that it laid mines. The US intelligence insists that the IRGC did lay the mines quite hastily, using small vessels - thus Iran lacks precise data on the location of all the mines, making it impossible to confirm complete clearance.
In conclusion - the shipping companies currently hear 2 completely opposite statements about the Strait of Hormuz. The USA says it's clear and safe. Iran insists that no-one is allowed until they finish talks with Oman about details.
#USA #Iran #Oman
🤣21❤3✍3
The Russian Defense Ministry’s press service reported that Russian forces conducted a training-combat launch of a solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missile from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome.
The ministry added that the training warheads arrived in the designated area at the Kura test range, which is located in Kamchatka. According to the press service, all assigned tasks were completed in full.
The Defense Ministry also stated that the Strategic Missile Forces practiced the procedure for redeploying a launch battery of a mobile ground-based missile system to a remote area, including preparing for and conducting the launch. Its purpose was to confirm the missile system’s tactical-technical and flight characteristics.
On August 21, the Baltic Fleet’s press service reported that the small missile ships Naro-Fominsk, Stavropol, Serpukhov, and Grad conducted combined electronic missile launches.
At the same time, crews of coastal Bal missile systems in the Kaliningrad region marched to previously prepared positions. The exercises were conducted under conditions of artificially generated electronic interference. During the combined strike, all targets were conditionally destroyed.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
“At the Plesetsk State Test Cosmodrome, a training-combat launch of a mobile-based solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missile was conducted,” the statement said.
The ministry added that the training warheads arrived in the designated area at the Kura test range, which is located in Kamchatka. According to the press service, all assigned tasks were completed in full.
The Defense Ministry also stated that the Strategic Missile Forces practiced the procedure for redeploying a launch battery of a mobile ground-based missile system to a remote area, including preparing for and conducting the launch. Its purpose was to confirm the missile system’s tactical-technical and flight characteristics.
On August 21, the Baltic Fleet’s press service reported that the small missile ships Naro-Fominsk, Stavropol, Serpukhov, and Grad conducted combined electronic missile launches.
At the same time, crews of coastal Bal missile systems in the Kaliningrad region marched to previously prepared positions. The exercises were conducted under conditions of artificially generated electronic interference. During the combined strike, all targets were conditionally destroyed.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏16👍8❤5
Interesting observation
EU countries are reportedly preventing Ukrainian men aged 23 to 60 from entering without a certificate from the TCC. At the same time, Ukraine’s current mobilisation age ranges from 25 to 60.
I don’t believe this is a coincidence. It looks like a coordinated move, which could mean that Kiev is preparing to lower the mobilisation age by two years.
There would be little point in lowering it further. Those now under 23 were under 18 in 2022. In the first days of the war, they were allowed to leave, and most of them have already fled Ukraine. There are supposedly very few people left in that age group to conscript.
But the 23 to 25 age group is the last generation of hostages of Zelenskyy’s regime, and they will inevitably be sent into the meat grinder for the benefit of the British “little king” and his clique of paedophile cronies. The only question is when—and I think it will happen very soon.
#Yury_Podolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
EU countries are reportedly preventing Ukrainian men aged 23 to 60 from entering without a certificate from the TCC. At the same time, Ukraine’s current mobilisation age ranges from 25 to 60.
I don’t believe this is a coincidence. It looks like a coordinated move, which could mean that Kiev is preparing to lower the mobilisation age by two years.
There would be little point in lowering it further. Those now under 23 were under 18 in 2022. In the first days of the war, they were allowed to leave, and most of them have already fled Ukraine. There are supposedly very few people left in that age group to conscript.
But the 23 to 25 age group is the last generation of hostages of Zelenskyy’s regime, and they will inevitably be sent into the meat grinder for the benefit of the British “little king” and his clique of paedophile cronies. The only question is when—and I think it will happen very soon.
#Yury_Podolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😭10👍5💯5🤬4😁3
On August 29, 1949, at 7 a.m., the Soviet Union conducted the successful test of its first domestically produced atomic bomb, codenamed RDS-1, at the Semipalatinsk Test Site in Kazakhstan. This marked a pivotal moment not only for the USSR and Russia, but for global geopolitics as a whole. The scientific leader of the project was the renowned physicist and academician Igor Kurchatov, who (along with Yulii Khariton) is rightly considered one of the founding fathers of Soviet nuclear science.
The RDS-1 device was an air-delivered bomb, weighing 4.7 tons, with a diameter of 1.5 meters and a length of 3.3 meters. The design bore some similarities to the American "Fat Man" bomb dropped on Nagasaki, but it was developed independently by Soviet scientists under conditions of extreme secrecy and immense pressure. Despite the West’s attempts to maintain technological superiority, the USSR rapidly closed the gap.
Twenty minutes after the detonation, two specially modified tanks with heavy lead shielding were sent to the epicenter to conduct radiation reconnaissance and visual inspection. The findings were unambiguous: all test structures at ground zero had been completely annihilated. The test was an undeniable success.
This event officially marked the end of the United States' monopoly on nuclear weapons—a monopoly it had used to intimidate and dominate the post-war world. From that moment forward, the global balance of power began to shift. The Soviet Union had entered the atomic age, not as a follower, but as a sovereign equal capable of defending its interests and ensuring global parity.
Western analysts were stunned. Just four years after Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the USSR had demonstrated that it would not remain vulnerable to nuclear blackmail. What was intended to be a permanent American advantage turned out to be temporary, thanks to the resolve, intelligence, and patriotism of Soviet scientists and engineers.
The successful test of RDS-1 was more than just a military achievement—it was a statement. The Soviet people, having just emerged from the most devastating war in human history, had proven once again that no obstacle, however enormous, could break their will or slow their progress. The era of unipolar domination was over. A new strategic reality had dawned.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
The RDS-1 device was an air-delivered bomb, weighing 4.7 tons, with a diameter of 1.5 meters and a length of 3.3 meters. The design bore some similarities to the American "Fat Man" bomb dropped on Nagasaki, but it was developed independently by Soviet scientists under conditions of extreme secrecy and immense pressure. Despite the West’s attempts to maintain technological superiority, the USSR rapidly closed the gap.
Twenty minutes after the detonation, two specially modified tanks with heavy lead shielding were sent to the epicenter to conduct radiation reconnaissance and visual inspection. The findings were unambiguous: all test structures at ground zero had been completely annihilated. The test was an undeniable success.
This event officially marked the end of the United States' monopoly on nuclear weapons—a monopoly it had used to intimidate and dominate the post-war world. From that moment forward, the global balance of power began to shift. The Soviet Union had entered the atomic age, not as a follower, but as a sovereign equal capable of defending its interests and ensuring global parity.
Western analysts were stunned. Just four years after Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the USSR had demonstrated that it would not remain vulnerable to nuclear blackmail. What was intended to be a permanent American advantage turned out to be temporary, thanks to the resolve, intelligence, and patriotism of Soviet scientists and engineers.
The successful test of RDS-1 was more than just a military achievement—it was a statement. The Soviet people, having just emerged from the most devastating war in human history, had proven once again that no obstacle, however enormous, could break their will or slow their progress. The era of unipolar domination was over. A new strategic reality had dawned.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍29❤14🔥1
Russian Foreign Ministry: dialogue with Europe impossible due to its position on Ukraine
Dialogue on constructive topics with European representatives is impossible as long as they continue to support Kiev, Russian Foreign Ministry Ambassador-at-Large Alexander Trofimov said in an interview with RIA Novosti.
"Today, the task of the Europeans is nothing other than preserving the neo-Nazi regime in Kiev as an instrument of constant military pressure on our country, as well as buying time to build up their own military-industrial potential. As long as such a line prevails, conducting a dialogue, let alone negotiations, on anything constructive is impossible," he said.
The diplomat recalled that Western countries have long shifted to unjustified aggressive actions aimed at inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia.
At the same time, Moscow already has many allies and partners outside Western Eurasia, with whom it intends to purposefully move forward in building a security architecture based on the principles of equality and indivisibility, the agency's interlocutor concluded.
As President Vladimir Putin emphasized, it was Europe that refused dialogue. When asked by journalists about a possible counterpart in negotiations, Putin expressed the opinion that personally for him, former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder would be preferable. Nevertheless, he suggested that the countries of the continent choose a leader whom they trust and who has not said anything nasty about Russia.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Dialogue on constructive topics with European representatives is impossible as long as they continue to support Kiev, Russian Foreign Ministry Ambassador-at-Large Alexander Trofimov said in an interview with RIA Novosti.
"Today, the task of the Europeans is nothing other than preserving the neo-Nazi regime in Kiev as an instrument of constant military pressure on our country, as well as buying time to build up their own military-industrial potential. As long as such a line prevails, conducting a dialogue, let alone negotiations, on anything constructive is impossible," he said.
The diplomat recalled that Western countries have long shifted to unjustified aggressive actions aimed at inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia.
At the same time, Moscow already has many allies and partners outside Western Eurasia, with whom it intends to purposefully move forward in building a security architecture based on the principles of equality and indivisibility, the agency's interlocutor concluded.
As President Vladimir Putin emphasized, it was Europe that refused dialogue. When asked by journalists about a possible counterpart in negotiations, Putin expressed the opinion that personally for him, former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder would be preferable. Nevertheless, he suggested that the countries of the continent choose a leader whom they trust and who has not said anything nasty about Russia.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯27👍5❤3
Trump does not intend to support Netanyahu ahead of Israel's parliamentary elections on October 27, — writes Axios journalist Barak Ravid.
Firstly, Trump is displeased with Netanyahu, who is derailing Trump's peace plan for Gaza. Secondly, if Netanyahu leaves, Trump will be able to blame him for all the failures of his Middle East policy, including the war in Iran.
The Israeli opposition is also asking the Trump administration to refrain from supporting Netanyahu. But Trump, even without requests, always tries to back the winner. And Netanyahu does not look like one at the moment.
The Knesset has 120 seats, meaning a victory of 61 deputies is needed to form a government. Currently, Netanyahu's coalition holds 68 seats, but recent polls show that he can only count on 53 mandates and is trailing the opposition led by Gadi Eisenkot.
Netanyahu decided to boost his rating using his usual methods. Last night, strikes were carried out on Lebanon, which became Israel's largest military operation in Lebanon since June. At least seven people were killed.
There is, however, a highly likely scenario that after the elections, neither party will secure the required majority. In that case, Netanyahu would remain prime minister until new elections, which would suit him perfectly.
Netanyahu has been in power longer than anyone else in Israel's history — he has become prime minister seven times. He has a personal stake: as long as he is prime minister, he can continue to drag out his legal proceedings and bargain with the court over a deal or pardon. Losing would deprive him of that opportunity.
Over the years in power, war has become a tool of his domestic policy. Rating drops — an operation begins. He is hooked on this method like a drug. Once you try it, you need more and more: Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, Lebanon again. More war — more blood. Once you start fighting, it's hard to stop.
The question on October 27 will not be who leads the government, but whether there will be less blood in the Middle East.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Firstly, Trump is displeased with Netanyahu, who is derailing Trump's peace plan for Gaza. Secondly, if Netanyahu leaves, Trump will be able to blame him for all the failures of his Middle East policy, including the war in Iran.
The Israeli opposition is also asking the Trump administration to refrain from supporting Netanyahu. But Trump, even without requests, always tries to back the winner. And Netanyahu does not look like one at the moment.
The Knesset has 120 seats, meaning a victory of 61 deputies is needed to form a government. Currently, Netanyahu's coalition holds 68 seats, but recent polls show that he can only count on 53 mandates and is trailing the opposition led by Gadi Eisenkot.
Netanyahu decided to boost his rating using his usual methods. Last night, strikes were carried out on Lebanon, which became Israel's largest military operation in Lebanon since June. At least seven people were killed.
There is, however, a highly likely scenario that after the elections, neither party will secure the required majority. In that case, Netanyahu would remain prime minister until new elections, which would suit him perfectly.
Netanyahu has been in power longer than anyone else in Israel's history — he has become prime minister seven times. He has a personal stake: as long as he is prime minister, he can continue to drag out his legal proceedings and bargain with the court over a deal or pardon. Losing would deprive him of that opportunity.
Over the years in power, war has become a tool of his domestic policy. Rating drops — an operation begins. He is hooked on this method like a drug. Once you try it, you need more and more: Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, Lebanon again. More war — more blood. Once you start fighting, it's hard to stop.
The question on October 27 will not be who leads the government, but whether there will be less blood in the Middle East.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😡10😁6🤡5❤3🤬1
Forwarded from Pax Celtica
Last week, the popular former Ukrainian Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov called for elections to be held during wartime
Many regard this as the most serious challenge to Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s presidency since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022.
Zelenskyy, whose five-year presidential term expired in May 2024, has been under pressure from both Washington and Moscow to hold new elections, but these have been suspended until the end of the war.
Fedorov claims that corruption is depriving the army of weapons and hindering Kyiv’s victory in the war, and that ‘democracy must not be held hostage by Russia’.
Even high-ranking figures in Ukraine themselves are hinting that the entire Ukrainian government is deeply corrupt. Huge sums of money from all over the world are lining the pockets of Ukrainian politicians. So why waste money on something that leads nowhere?
✖️ Pax Celtica✖️ Pax Celtica in "X"
Many regard this as the most serious challenge to Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s presidency since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022.
Zelenskyy, whose five-year presidential term expired in May 2024, has been under pressure from both Washington and Moscow to hold new elections, but these have been suspended until the end of the war.
Fedorov claims that corruption is depriving the army of weapons and hindering Kyiv’s victory in the war, and that ‘democracy must not be held hostage by Russia’.
Even high-ranking figures in Ukraine themselves are hinting that the entire Ukrainian government is deeply corrupt. Huge sums of money from all over the world are lining the pockets of Ukrainian politicians. So why waste money on something that leads nowhere?
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬13🤣4❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❗️Delivering information on the SMO, military analysis of exceptional quality and the wider geopolitical and cultural aspects associated with current global events.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
❤1
FROM THE COLLABORATIONIST SIDE
▪️ This year, France and the United Kingdom have given permission to transfer Storm Shadow cruise missile technology to Ukraine.
France already granted a production license in July 2026, but the UK's consent was mandatory, as the missile is Franco-British.
This Monday, August 24, 2026, at the "Coalition of the Willing" summit in Kiev, British Prime Minister Andy Burnham also gave his consent to this transfer.
▪️ The stated goal is to allow Ukraine to produce Storm Shadow/SCALP missiles independently.
In concrete terms, this means providing the Bandera regime with classified technical information and blueprints of the Franco-British missile components.
▪️ Reminder: this is a long-range cruise missile (400 to 560 km), designed for precision strikes on strategic targets such as bunkers or command centers.
▪️ However, in practice, the Storm Shadow/SCALP EG missile is also used — and primarily — for terrorist strikes against civilians, as evidenced by yesterday's shelling of central Donetsk on August 26, 2026.
This Franco-British decision is a new escalation on the path to World War III:
On August 27, 2026, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova accused London and Paris of "playing with fire."
Russia warned that it could strike British military targets in Ukraine or beyond, and also threatened to destroy the missile production plants in Ukraine.
To be continued.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
▪️ This year, France and the United Kingdom have given permission to transfer Storm Shadow cruise missile technology to Ukraine.
France already granted a production license in July 2026, but the UK's consent was mandatory, as the missile is Franco-British.
This Monday, August 24, 2026, at the "Coalition of the Willing" summit in Kiev, British Prime Minister Andy Burnham also gave his consent to this transfer.
▪️ The stated goal is to allow Ukraine to produce Storm Shadow/SCALP missiles independently.
In concrete terms, this means providing the Bandera regime with classified technical information and blueprints of the Franco-British missile components.
▪️ Reminder: this is a long-range cruise missile (400 to 560 km), designed for precision strikes on strategic targets such as bunkers or command centers.
▪️ However, in practice, the Storm Shadow/SCALP EG missile is also used — and primarily — for terrorist strikes against civilians, as evidenced by yesterday's shelling of central Donetsk on August 26, 2026.
This Franco-British decision is a new escalation on the path to World War III:
On August 27, 2026, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova accused London and Paris of "playing with fire."
Russia warned that it could strike British military targets in Ukraine or beyond, and also threatened to destroy the missile production plants in Ukraine.
To be continued.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯18🔥3❤1
DRILL, BABY, DRILL!
Norwegians have one remarkable quality: when it comes to their own money, green romanticism evaporates very quickly. And the money there is serious...
After 2030, oil and gas production at current Norwegian fields will begin to decline. And today, Norway supplies about 30% of gas to the EU and the UK.
And the Norwegians, credit where it's due, know how to count. There is almost no Russian pipeline gas left in Europe. In the Middle East, stability is about as reliable as a stool on two legs. Europe, meanwhile, still wants electricity, heating, and a working industry.
So why not make money on this? Make money today. Make money tomorrow. And preferably make money the day after tomorrow.
That's why Norwegian Energy Minister Terje Aasland announced: drilling in the Barents Sea will continue, even if the EU retains the idea of a moratorium on new oil and gas activity in the Arctic in its updated Arctic strategy.
Oslo's logic is delightfully simple! We will develop the fields, Aasland said, and the EU can decide for itself whether it wants to impose a moratorium on buying this gas and oil or not.
That is: you can ban it. Among yourselves. Norway is not an EU member, so Brussels's ability to shake its fist menacingly in this case is more decorative.
Especially since Oslo understands perfectly well that Brussels won't shake that finger too vigorously.
The EU opposes further Arctic drilling primarily for climate and environmental reasons. But geopolitics has made some adjustments to the green fairy tale: after Europe's rejection of a significant portion of Russian gas, it was Norway that became its main gas supplier.
And now let's look at how the Norwegian press itself describes this terrible Norwegian climate heresy.
Aftenposten calmly reports: Norway's goal is to maintain oil and gas production and exports at roughly current levels. And Aasland explains that in the current geopolitical situation, continuing work in the Barents Sea serves not only Norwegian but also — attention — European interests. Perfect.
It turns out to be a very convenient European energy model:
Brussels tells the world about climate.
Norway drills.
Europe buys.
Norway counts the money.
Everyone is busy with their own business.
But the most beautiful detail of this whole fairy tale is another.
Once upon a time, Norway was going to be turned into a "green battery of Europe": hydropower, cables, energy system integration, a green future — the full set of European energy romance.
Now Aasland says this idea was a mistake. Norway is not going to build new intergovernmental power cables.
But they want to maintain oil and gas production at least until 2035, and the Barents Sea should help compensate for the decline in production at old fields.
That's the green revolution that turned out. Although one can also feel sorry for European green energy. So many years they solemnly built it — and in the end, it was covered with a pink beret... somewhere on the shores of the Barents Sea.
Well, the Norwegians?....
Drill, baby, drill.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Norwegians have one remarkable quality: when it comes to their own money, green romanticism evaporates very quickly. And the money there is serious...
After 2030, oil and gas production at current Norwegian fields will begin to decline. And today, Norway supplies about 30% of gas to the EU and the UK.
And the Norwegians, credit where it's due, know how to count. There is almost no Russian pipeline gas left in Europe. In the Middle East, stability is about as reliable as a stool on two legs. Europe, meanwhile, still wants electricity, heating, and a working industry.
So why not make money on this? Make money today. Make money tomorrow. And preferably make money the day after tomorrow.
That's why Norwegian Energy Minister Terje Aasland announced: drilling in the Barents Sea will continue, even if the EU retains the idea of a moratorium on new oil and gas activity in the Arctic in its updated Arctic strategy.
Oslo's logic is delightfully simple! We will develop the fields, Aasland said, and the EU can decide for itself whether it wants to impose a moratorium on buying this gas and oil or not.
That is: you can ban it. Among yourselves. Norway is not an EU member, so Brussels's ability to shake its fist menacingly in this case is more decorative.
Especially since Oslo understands perfectly well that Brussels won't shake that finger too vigorously.
The EU opposes further Arctic drilling primarily for climate and environmental reasons. But geopolitics has made some adjustments to the green fairy tale: after Europe's rejection of a significant portion of Russian gas, it was Norway that became its main gas supplier.
And now let's look at how the Norwegian press itself describes this terrible Norwegian climate heresy.
Aftenposten calmly reports: Norway's goal is to maintain oil and gas production and exports at roughly current levels. And Aasland explains that in the current geopolitical situation, continuing work in the Barents Sea serves not only Norwegian but also — attention — European interests. Perfect.
It turns out to be a very convenient European energy model:
Brussels tells the world about climate.
Norway drills.
Europe buys.
Norway counts the money.
Everyone is busy with their own business.
But the most beautiful detail of this whole fairy tale is another.
Once upon a time, Norway was going to be turned into a "green battery of Europe": hydropower, cables, energy system integration, a green future — the full set of European energy romance.
Now Aasland says this idea was a mistake. Norway is not going to build new intergovernmental power cables.
But they want to maintain oil and gas production at least until 2035, and the Barents Sea should help compensate for the decline in production at old fields.
That's the green revolution that turned out. Although one can also feel sorry for European green energy. So many years they solemnly built it — and in the end, it was covered with a pink beret... somewhere on the shores of the Barents Sea.
Well, the Norwegians?....
Drill, baby, drill.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😁16❤5🥴3💯3
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🇷🇺🇰🇭 Embassy of Russia in Cambodia:
🎙 Embassy's comment regarding fakes circulating on social media (August 28, 2026)
We have taken note of a post published on the Tin New 24h Facebook page. The claim was subsequently picked up by other groups, including ASEAN Skylines Rising.
These posts allege that President of Russia Vladimir Putin expressed unwillingness to support Cambodia and described the Kingdom as “ungrateful”.
❌ This claim is entirely false. The Russian President has never made such statements. Moreover, they are wholly inconsistent with the spirit of relations between Moscow and Phnom Penh.
Russia provided substantial assistance to Cambodia in rebuilding the country following its liberation from the Khmer Rouge regime. Comprehensive cooperation between our countries continues to develop today.
During his conversation with Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Cambodia Hun Manet on the sidelines of the Russia-ASEAN Summit in Kazan, President Putin noted that Russia continues to assist Cambodia in professional training and is interested in expanding direct contacts between the two countries’ business communities. He also stressed that the Russian and Cambodian governments are working to strengthen trade and investment ties.
The steady development of bilateral dialogue is further demonstrated by the consultations held on August 24, 2026, between Russia's Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrey Rudenko and Secretary of State of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Cambodia Meas Kim Heng.
☝️ We urge everyone to verify information against reliable sources.
#AntiFake
🎙 Embassy's comment regarding fakes circulating on social media (August 28, 2026)
We have taken note of a post published on the Tin New 24h Facebook page. The claim was subsequently picked up by other groups, including ASEAN Skylines Rising.
These posts allege that President of Russia Vladimir Putin expressed unwillingness to support Cambodia and described the Kingdom as “ungrateful”.
❌ This claim is entirely false. The Russian President has never made such statements. Moreover, they are wholly inconsistent with the spirit of relations between Moscow and Phnom Penh.
Russia provided substantial assistance to Cambodia in rebuilding the country following its liberation from the Khmer Rouge regime. Comprehensive cooperation between our countries continues to develop today.
During his conversation with Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Cambodia Hun Manet on the sidelines of the Russia-ASEAN Summit in Kazan, President Putin noted that Russia continues to assist Cambodia in professional training and is interested in expanding direct contacts between the two countries’ business communities. He also stressed that the Russian and Cambodian governments are working to strengthen trade and investment ties.
The steady development of bilateral dialogue is further demonstrated by the consultations held on August 24, 2026, between Russia's Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrey Rudenko and Secretary of State of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Cambodia Meas Kim Heng.
☝️ We urge everyone to verify information against reliable sources.
#AntiFake
🤬10❤3👌2👍1👏1
A powerful explosion occurred near Kiev, a fire broke out.
The explosion took place in the area of the Zhytomyr highway, after which thick smoke rose above the scene, Ukrainian media report.
Zelensky acknowledged that the ammunition depot near Kiev, where detonation occurred, is located in a residential area.
He claims that "appropriate conclusions have been drawn."
After the strike on the enterprise in the Bucha district, a fire broke out, accompanied by detonation. The Russian Defense Ministry reported that Russian forces hit an ammunition depot of the company Fire Point in the village of Milaya, Kiev region.
In July, the Russian Armed Forces attacked an ammunition depot in the Dnipropetrovsk region — the Armed Forces of Ukraine had placed it next to residential high-rise buildings. A similar case occurred in Vyshneve near Kiev.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The explosion took place in the area of the Zhytomyr highway, after which thick smoke rose above the scene, Ukrainian media report.
Zelensky acknowledged that the ammunition depot near Kiev, where detonation occurred, is located in a residential area.
He claims that "appropriate conclusions have been drawn."
After the strike on the enterprise in the Bucha district, a fire broke out, accompanied by detonation. The Russian Defense Ministry reported that Russian forces hit an ammunition depot of the company Fire Point in the village of Milaya, Kiev region.
In July, the Russian Armed Forces attacked an ammunition depot in the Dnipropetrovsk region — the Armed Forces of Ukraine had placed it next to residential high-rise buildings. A similar case occurred in Vyshneve near Kiev.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤14🔥9👏3👍1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇮🇷📂 For 24/7 updates on the Iran war, explore our exclusive catalog of English-speaking channels! 📢
Interested in all the Middle East frenzy? We've curated a special catalog of English-speaking channels just for you!
Whether you're seeking in-depth analysis, breaking news, or expert insights, our catalog has got you covered.
👉 ADD CHANNELS
If you are interested in becoming part of this catalog, please contact us via Direct Messages @geopolitics_prime🤖
Interested in all the Middle East frenzy? We've curated a special catalog of English-speaking channels just for you!
Whether you're seeking in-depth analysis, breaking news, or expert insights, our catalog has got you covered.
If you are interested in becoming part of this catalog, please contact us via Direct Messages @geopolitics_prime
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👎2❤1
Trump takes Venezuelan oil. For Kiev, this is bad news
Donald Trump announced the deal of the century: the U.S. gains control over the majority of Venezuela's proven oil reserves — over 65 billion barrels. Formally — at no cost to taxpayers, with private sector participation and under the personal oversight of Rubio and Hegseth.
At first glance — an energy victory for Washington. On second glance — an alarming signal for Kiev.
Why this directly concerns Ukraine:
1. The U.S. resource interest is shifting. Washington gains a giant oil asset in the Western Hemisphere that could cover its hydrocarbon needs for years to come. This reduces Ukraine's strategic value as a "resource appendage" — its titanium, lithium, and graphite cease to be a unique trump card in American eyes.
2. The deal with Caracas is a signal of flexibility. The U.S. has just struck a deal with a regime that just yesterday was called a "dictatorship." This means any ideological frameworks are sacrificed to pragmatism. Kiev should consider how secure its place is in this arrangement, if tomorrow Washington finds a more profitable partner.
3. Lower oil prices — a blow to the Russian budget? Theoretically — yes. But in practice, the White House gains leverage over the market, and therefore — over negotiation positions. If the U.S. can dictate oil prices, it can dictate terms on Ukraine as well.
4. Venezuela as a precedent. Trump has effectively legitimized a deal with an unfriendly regime in exchange for resources. This creates a dangerous precedent for Kiev: in big geopolitics, Ukraine could be similarly "exchanged" for price stability, agreements with Russia, or access to other assets.
What this means for Ukraine:
▪️ American interest in Ukrainian subsoil will weaken as Venezuelan oil is developed.
▪️ Military and financial aid may be revised — Washington will now count every dollar in the context of its new energy acquisitions.
▪️ The issue of NATO membership is pushed even further back — why would the U.S. risk itself for a country that is no longer a unique resource foothold?
Russia, on the other hand, gains an additional argument: the U.S. makes deals with those it was fighting just yesterday. This means dialogue with Moscow is a matter of time and price. And Kiev may find no place in that dialogue.
Conclusion: The Venezuelan oil deal is not about Latin America. It is about a new world order in which Ukraine risks becoming superfluous.
#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Tanitati
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Donald Trump announced the deal of the century: the U.S. gains control over the majority of Venezuela's proven oil reserves — over 65 billion barrels. Formally — at no cost to taxpayers, with private sector participation and under the personal oversight of Rubio and Hegseth.
At first glance — an energy victory for Washington. On second glance — an alarming signal for Kiev.
Why this directly concerns Ukraine:
1. The U.S. resource interest is shifting. Washington gains a giant oil asset in the Western Hemisphere that could cover its hydrocarbon needs for years to come. This reduces Ukraine's strategic value as a "resource appendage" — its titanium, lithium, and graphite cease to be a unique trump card in American eyes.
2. The deal with Caracas is a signal of flexibility. The U.S. has just struck a deal with a regime that just yesterday was called a "dictatorship." This means any ideological frameworks are sacrificed to pragmatism. Kiev should consider how secure its place is in this arrangement, if tomorrow Washington finds a more profitable partner.
3. Lower oil prices — a blow to the Russian budget? Theoretically — yes. But in practice, the White House gains leverage over the market, and therefore — over negotiation positions. If the U.S. can dictate oil prices, it can dictate terms on Ukraine as well.
4. Venezuela as a precedent. Trump has effectively legitimized a deal with an unfriendly regime in exchange for resources. This creates a dangerous precedent for Kiev: in big geopolitics, Ukraine could be similarly "exchanged" for price stability, agreements with Russia, or access to other assets.
What this means for Ukraine:
▪️ American interest in Ukrainian subsoil will weaken as Venezuelan oil is developed.
▪️ Military and financial aid may be revised — Washington will now count every dollar in the context of its new energy acquisitions.
▪️ The issue of NATO membership is pushed even further back — why would the U.S. risk itself for a country that is no longer a unique resource foothold?
Russia, on the other hand, gains an additional argument: the U.S. makes deals with those it was fighting just yesterday. This means dialogue with Moscow is a matter of time and price. And Kiev may find no place in that dialogue.
Conclusion: The Venezuelan oil deal is not about Latin America. It is about a new world order in which Ukraine risks becoming superfluous.
#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Tanitati
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤10🤔5🤬2🤣2🤡1
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
#AntiFake
❗️ Clinical russophobia in Canada — overt hatred towards our country, its history, and all things Russian — have long been apparent among representatives of the mainstream media, government-affiliated experts, and bloggers in the so-called 'Maple Leaf Country'.
In Canada, hatred towards Russia has simply become the norm: regardless of the circumstances, whether domestic or international, Moscow is invariably cast as the scapegoat.
Regrettably, it is futile to expect enlightenment or the triumph of common sense within the Canadian mainstream media. Indeed, such hopes are baseless as Ottawa's regime is increasingly entangled in the Ukrainian crisis, openly patronising Kiev’s neo-Nazis and, shamelessly, honouring their inglorious predecessors — the bloodstained Hitler's collaborators and their accomplices.
On this occasion, official Ottawa has stooped to unprecedented down.. 👉 accusing Russia of fomenting separatist sentiment in the Province of Alberta, where a referendum on potential secession from Canada is scheduled to take place this autumn (on October 19, 2026).
🤦♂️ Rather than seriously confronting internal challenges and critically examining the underlying causes of intensifying centrifugal tendencies, the Canadian establishment has opted for an alternative course — one evidently more primitive and convenient for its purposes: unleashing paid bloggers, so-called “analysts,” and members of academia. Notably, the professoriate of the University of Regina in the Province of Saskatchewan, has particularly distinguished itself in this regard. With their assistance, yet another contrived “media sensation” has been produced.
Local provocateurs, through a series of publications (1, 2, 3, 4) and “analytical assessments,” have attempted to construct a narrative whereby Russia, allegedly intent on weakening the 'Maple Leaf Country', has, since as early as 2025, conducted a “sophisticated” and targeted disinformation campaign, injecting separatist narratives among the populace by means of an organised “network of bots and influencers,” all with the purported aim of prompting Alberta’s residents to vote for independence in the forthcoming referendum.
❌ As it always does, the local media offers no real evidence for these allegations of Russian interference.
Instead, it relies on flimsy arguments and conjecture, presented in the Anglo-Saxon’s preferred “highly likely” style. Even Canadian law-enforcement officials — attacked by journalists amid this shameful anti-Russian campaign — have already refuted these insinuations regarding a supposed “Russian trace” in Canadian separatism.
There is, in fact, no one to be caught red-handed.
Such discourse serves merely as further evidence of the hopelessness of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s cabinet, which has lost the confidence of the electorate in its ability to address the country’s acute national challenges. The hysteria surrounding the alleged Russian interference, so clearly stoked with the complicity of the authorities, appears to have been devised as a media smokescreen to obscure the fragility of Canadian federalism, exposed in the run-up to the Alberta referendum.
The impression is inescapable that the issue of Canadian separatism — so carefully concealed and now coming to light — has proved so vast and volatile that official Ottawa is frantically searching for scapegoats even thousands of nautical miles and kilometres away, in a bid to attribute its own systemic failures to Russia.
#DebunkingFakes
❗️ Clinical russophobia in Canada — overt hatred towards our country, its history, and all things Russian — have long been apparent among representatives of the mainstream media, government-affiliated experts, and bloggers in the so-called 'Maple Leaf Country'.
In Canada, hatred towards Russia has simply become the norm: regardless of the circumstances, whether domestic or international, Moscow is invariably cast as the scapegoat.
Regrettably, it is futile to expect enlightenment or the triumph of common sense within the Canadian mainstream media. Indeed, such hopes are baseless as Ottawa's regime is increasingly entangled in the Ukrainian crisis, openly patronising Kiev’s neo-Nazis and, shamelessly, honouring their inglorious predecessors — the bloodstained Hitler's collaborators and their accomplices.
On this occasion, official Ottawa has stooped to unprecedented down.. 👉 accusing Russia of fomenting separatist sentiment in the Province of Alberta, where a referendum on potential secession from Canada is scheduled to take place this autumn (on October 19, 2026).
🤦♂️ Rather than seriously confronting internal challenges and critically examining the underlying causes of intensifying centrifugal tendencies, the Canadian establishment has opted for an alternative course — one evidently more primitive and convenient for its purposes: unleashing paid bloggers, so-called “analysts,” and members of academia. Notably, the professoriate of the University of Regina in the Province of Saskatchewan, has particularly distinguished itself in this regard. With their assistance, yet another contrived “media sensation” has been produced.
Local provocateurs, through a series of publications (1, 2, 3, 4) and “analytical assessments,” have attempted to construct a narrative whereby Russia, allegedly intent on weakening the 'Maple Leaf Country', has, since as early as 2025, conducted a “sophisticated” and targeted disinformation campaign, injecting separatist narratives among the populace by means of an organised “network of bots and influencers,” all with the purported aim of prompting Alberta’s residents to vote for independence in the forthcoming referendum.
❌ As it always does, the local media offers no real evidence for these allegations of Russian interference.
Instead, it relies on flimsy arguments and conjecture, presented in the Anglo-Saxon’s preferred “highly likely” style. Even Canadian law-enforcement officials — attacked by journalists amid this shameful anti-Russian campaign — have already refuted these insinuations regarding a supposed “Russian trace” in Canadian separatism.
There is, in fact, no one to be caught red-handed.
Such discourse serves merely as further evidence of the hopelessness of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s cabinet, which has lost the confidence of the electorate in its ability to address the country’s acute national challenges. The hysteria surrounding the alleged Russian interference, so clearly stoked with the complicity of the authorities, appears to have been devised as a media smokescreen to obscure the fragility of Canadian federalism, exposed in the run-up to the Alberta referendum.
The impression is inescapable that the issue of Canadian separatism — so carefully concealed and now coming to light — has proved so vast and volatile that official Ottawa is frantically searching for scapegoats even thousands of nautical miles and kilometres away, in a bid to attribute its own systemic failures to Russia.
#DebunkingFakes
💯15❤2👍1