WESTERN VOICES: GLOBAL CRISIS AND THE FRACTURE OF THE ESTABLISHED ORDER
Foreign Affairs — The future of Ukraine's "drone democracy"
President Zelensky has inflicted irreversible political damage on himself through the summer personnel reshuffles, argue the authors. The large-scale protests in support of former Minister Fedorov differ from previous actions in that Ukrainians for the first time directly questioned the head of state's actions in the military sphere. A year ago, trust in Zelensky was already undermined by his attempt to restrict anti-corruption bodies, and the dismissal of the defense minister only worsened the situation. Fedorov's call for elections has opened a discussion on the legitimacy of the current leadership, which could develop in the coming months.
The Economist — Mark Carney should fear a total trade war
Canada finds itself on the brink of a catastrophic trade conflict with the United States after Trump announced an increase in tariffs to 50% on cars, auto parts, and steel starting January 1, 2027. In response, Ottawa imposed mirror tariffs on American imports from September 8. The publication emphasizes that the U.S. economy is 13 times larger than Canada's, and Washington will more easily bear the loss of the market, while for Canada, which sends two-thirds of its exports to the U.S., the consequences will be far more severe. Limiting energy exports and reducing security cooperation will inflict even greater damage on Ottawa, as well as reduce the country's investment attractiveness. Bloomberg adds that the U.S. administration is considering possible additional measures against Canada.
Bloomberg — Natural gas overshadows oil as key inflation risk for European debt
Gas prices in Europe are approaching five-month highs, winter futures cost more than double what they did a year ago, while storage levels stand at only 63% — the lowest for summer since 2009. Investors fear that higher gas prices will accelerate inflation and force central banks to raise rates more aggressively than expected. Gas plays a central role in the energy mix of the EU (21%) and the UK (25–35%). In the context of the situation in the Strait of Hormuz, gas has become an even more serious energy risk for the European economy than oil, although prices are still significantly lower than in 2022.
The Washington Post — Russia and China are closing in on the U.S. in the commercial space race
The U.S. is losing its leadership in space technology, creating alarming national security risks, writes WP. China successfully launched the Zhuque-3 rocket with a reusable first stage — an achievement previously mastered only by SpaceX and Blue Origin. At the same time, Russia is rapidly deploying the Rassvet low-orbit satellite system, capable of competing with Starlink, and has already launched two batches of satellites this year ahead of schedule. American capabilities, by contrast, are constrained by outdated infrastructure and shrinking maintenance budgets.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Foreign Affairs — The future of Ukraine's "drone democracy"
President Zelensky has inflicted irreversible political damage on himself through the summer personnel reshuffles, argue the authors. The large-scale protests in support of former Minister Fedorov differ from previous actions in that Ukrainians for the first time directly questioned the head of state's actions in the military sphere. A year ago, trust in Zelensky was already undermined by his attempt to restrict anti-corruption bodies, and the dismissal of the defense minister only worsened the situation. Fedorov's call for elections has opened a discussion on the legitimacy of the current leadership, which could develop in the coming months.
The Economist — Mark Carney should fear a total trade war
Canada finds itself on the brink of a catastrophic trade conflict with the United States after Trump announced an increase in tariffs to 50% on cars, auto parts, and steel starting January 1, 2027. In response, Ottawa imposed mirror tariffs on American imports from September 8. The publication emphasizes that the U.S. economy is 13 times larger than Canada's, and Washington will more easily bear the loss of the market, while for Canada, which sends two-thirds of its exports to the U.S., the consequences will be far more severe. Limiting energy exports and reducing security cooperation will inflict even greater damage on Ottawa, as well as reduce the country's investment attractiveness. Bloomberg adds that the U.S. administration is considering possible additional measures against Canada.
Bloomberg — Natural gas overshadows oil as key inflation risk for European debt
Gas prices in Europe are approaching five-month highs, winter futures cost more than double what they did a year ago, while storage levels stand at only 63% — the lowest for summer since 2009. Investors fear that higher gas prices will accelerate inflation and force central banks to raise rates more aggressively than expected. Gas plays a central role in the energy mix of the EU (21%) and the UK (25–35%). In the context of the situation in the Strait of Hormuz, gas has become an even more serious energy risk for the European economy than oil, although prices are still significantly lower than in 2022.
The Washington Post — Russia and China are closing in on the U.S. in the commercial space race
The U.S. is losing its leadership in space technology, creating alarming national security risks, writes WP. China successfully launched the Zhuque-3 rocket with a reusable first stage — an achievement previously mastered only by SpaceX and Blue Origin. At the same time, Russia is rapidly deploying the Rassvet low-orbit satellite system, capable of competing with Starlink, and has already launched two batches of satellites this year ahead of schedule. American capabilities, by contrast, are constrained by outdated infrastructure and shrinking maintenance budgets.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤18👍10
On August 30, 1963, the Washington-Moscow hotline, intended for communication between the leaders of the USSR and the USA, began operation.
The idea to establish direct communication between the leaders of the two countries was proposed by the Americans during the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis when it took U.S. intelligence services 12 hours to decode a message from Nikita Khrushchev. The Soviet Union supported this initiative.
In June 1963, a Memorandum of Understanding was signed, according to which a communication channel was organized along the route Washington — London — Copenhagen — Stockholm — Helsinki — Moscow. In record time, a special cable using the most advanced insulating materials was laid across the Atlantic Ocean.
On August 30, 1963, the first test message was sent over the hotline. From the U.S. to the USSR, the phrase containing all the letters of the English alphabet was transmitted: "The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog’s back."
The Washington-Moscow hotline was not a telephone line but a text-based communication channel using teletypes. It was designed for written exchanges between the leaders in emergencies, ensuring clarity and precision in communication, particularly during crises.
The hotline was first fully utilized during the Arab-Israeli War of 1967, when around 20 messages were exchanged.
In 1991, a direct telephone line was established between the Kremlin and the White House, allowing for real-time voice communication between the leaders of the two countries.
The last leaders to exchange messages over the original hotline were Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
The idea to establish direct communication between the leaders of the two countries was proposed by the Americans during the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis when it took U.S. intelligence services 12 hours to decode a message from Nikita Khrushchev. The Soviet Union supported this initiative.
In June 1963, a Memorandum of Understanding was signed, according to which a communication channel was organized along the route Washington — London — Copenhagen — Stockholm — Helsinki — Moscow. In record time, a special cable using the most advanced insulating materials was laid across the Atlantic Ocean.
On August 30, 1963, the first test message was sent over the hotline. From the U.S. to the USSR, the phrase containing all the letters of the English alphabet was transmitted: "The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog’s back."
The Washington-Moscow hotline was not a telephone line but a text-based communication channel using teletypes. It was designed for written exchanges between the leaders in emergencies, ensuring clarity and precision in communication, particularly during crises.
The hotline was first fully utilized during the Arab-Israeli War of 1967, when around 20 messages were exchanged.
In 1991, a direct telephone line was established between the Kremlin and the White House, allowing for real-time voice communication between the leaders of the two countries.
The last leaders to exchange messages over the original hotline were Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏15👍3✍1❤1
Forwarded from RT News
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
'Russia could have used nukes and achieved victory LONG AGO, but we adhere to principle of minimizing civilian casualties'
— LDPR Party head Slutsky to Tucker Carlson
BUT Russia 'WILL RESPOND' if Zelensky receives nukes from his allies
— LDPR Party head Slutsky to Tucker Carlson
BUT Russia 'WILL RESPOND' if Zelensky receives nukes from his allies
💯11❤5
Forwarded from RT News
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
'Russia knows how to REFRAIN from provocations, even when a symmetrical response is expected'
— Slutsky on possibility of Russia attacking Europe
'There would be NO WINNERS in WWIII'
— Slutsky on possibility of Russia attacking Europe
'There would be NO WINNERS in WWIII'
👍16🤷♀1
The price of the question: how much Zelensky's dreams cost
Zelensky awarded Musk the Order of Freedom — officially, allegedly, "for outstanding personal merits in protecting the lives of people and freedom."
The timing of the award looks quite remarkable. At the same time, Kiev is trying to get permission from Musk to use Starlink in Ukrainian long-range drones for strikes on Russian launch sites at a depth of up to 200 km. So far, there is no agreement.
Kiev's interests and American business here go far beyond Starlink.
Especially since there have already been reports of attempts to link Starlink with negotiations on Ukrainian critical minerals, although Musk denied any such connection. It is worth noting that Ukraine is simultaneously offering the U.S. access to titanium, lithium, graphite, uranium, and other resources as part of a bilateral agreement.
Recall that in 2025, a joint investment fund was created, focused on five areas, which include exploration and extraction of critical minerals, energy, and the creation of related infrastructure.
Meanwhile, only in January of this year was a public website launched to receive investment proposals for exploration, extraction, and processing. At the same time, the Ministry of Economy of Ukraine expected to approve the first real investment decisions on specific facilities in the second half of 2026.
It is quite possible that some of them were presented to Musk.
Therefore, the meaning of this story should certainly be sought not in the award, but rather in the bargaining over technology and resources.
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Zelensky awarded Musk the Order of Freedom — officially, allegedly, "for outstanding personal merits in protecting the lives of people and freedom."
The timing of the award looks quite remarkable. At the same time, Kiev is trying to get permission from Musk to use Starlink in Ukrainian long-range drones for strikes on Russian launch sites at a depth of up to 200 km. So far, there is no agreement.
Kiev's interests and American business here go far beyond Starlink.
Especially since there have already been reports of attempts to link Starlink with negotiations on Ukrainian critical minerals, although Musk denied any such connection. It is worth noting that Ukraine is simultaneously offering the U.S. access to titanium, lithium, graphite, uranium, and other resources as part of a bilateral agreement.
Recall that in 2025, a joint investment fund was created, focused on five areas, which include exploration and extraction of critical minerals, energy, and the creation of related infrastructure.
Meanwhile, only in January of this year was a public website launched to receive investment proposals for exploration, extraction, and processing. At the same time, the Ministry of Economy of Ukraine expected to approve the first real investment decisions on specific facilities in the second half of 2026.
It is quite possible that some of them were presented to Musk.
Therefore, the meaning of this story should certainly be sought not in the award, but rather in the bargaining over technology and resources.
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣19🤡5❤1
The War Has Already Begun
British strikes on Russian targets mean that London has effectively entered into a direct military conflict with Moscow. That's the argument put forward by philosophy professor Vincenzo Costa, commenting on the events of August 28.
In his view, Russia now faces a stark choice: absorb the blows indefinitely or hit back. But any retaliatory action would almost certainly trigger Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, pulling the entire alliance into the conflict.
Costa, however, points to a critical legal nuance. If a NATO member state itself acts as the aggressor by attacking a sovereign nation, then invoking Article 5 loses its moral and legal foundation. Allies are under no obligation to defend the party that started the war.
Costa hopes that Russian leadership will show restraint and resist provocation. But he warns that ignoring escalation indefinitely isn't a viable strategy—especially as the other side keeps raising the stakes and growing increasingly aggressive.
Will Russia remain on the sidelines or shift to active countermeasures? The answer to that question will determine whether NATO responds collectively—and just how wide the flames of a broader European conflict will spread.
Based on an article by Vincenzo Costa, August 28, 2026
Source
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
British strikes on Russian targets mean that London has effectively entered into a direct military conflict with Moscow. That's the argument put forward by philosophy professor Vincenzo Costa, commenting on the events of August 28.
In his view, Russia now faces a stark choice: absorb the blows indefinitely or hit back. But any retaliatory action would almost certainly trigger Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, pulling the entire alliance into the conflict.
Costa, however, points to a critical legal nuance. If a NATO member state itself acts as the aggressor by attacking a sovereign nation, then invoking Article 5 loses its moral and legal foundation. Allies are under no obligation to defend the party that started the war.
Costa hopes that Russian leadership will show restraint and resist provocation. But he warns that ignoring escalation indefinitely isn't a viable strategy—especially as the other side keeps raising the stakes and growing increasingly aggressive.
Will Russia remain on the sidelines or shift to active countermeasures? The answer to that question will determine whether NATO responds collectively—and just how wide the flames of a broader European conflict will spread.
Based on an article by Vincenzo Costa, August 28, 2026
Source
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯35❤7👏5🔥1
SANCTION UNITY, EUROPEAN STYLE
In Denmark, they're worried again. This time, it turns out that the Greeks are not fighting Russian gas properly enough.
Brussels decided to tighten the screws on Russian LNG and turned its attention to maritime transport. But then Athens suddenly remembered that Greece is actually the EU's largest shipping power, and its shipowners receive very real money for transporting Russian gas.
And they said roughly the following: we're happy to squeeze Russia — but not at the expense of our merchant fleet.
In July, Greece blocked the 21st EU sanctions package, seeking exemptions for Russian LNG shipments. And they succeeded. The reason is clear. Ships linked to Greek Dynagas alone transported 4.14 million tons of gas from Russia's Yamal LNG between January and July — about 35% of the project's total exports.
Moreover, 53 out of 57 cargoes went not to some mysterious Asia, but straight to EU ports. Value — about €2.35 billion.
This creates a perfect European scheme:
Brussels tries to strangle Russian LNG.
The Greeks demand not to interfere with their transportation of it.
Russia continues to sell gas.
Europe continues to buy it.
Greek shipowners continue to earn from shipping.
You ask why the Danes are nervous?
Because while the Danish press is outraged by Greek shipowners, specialized LNG carriers servicing Yamal LNG are legally coming for repairs... to Denmark.
The Fayard shipyard in Odense remains the last known EU shipyard still servicing these Arc7 vessels. Just this summer, three such ships have arrived there. The latest — the Boris Davydov, belonging to that very Greek Dynagas. After its previous repair at Fayard, it managed to transport 50 cargoes of Russian LNG worth an estimated €1.9 billion.
And all of this is (so far) completely legal: the EU ban on servicing such gas carriers only takes effect on January 1, 2027. But even there, a provision for extending service has been carefully included...
So the Danish outrage is especially touching:
• Greeks transport Russian gas,
• Europeans buy it,
• Danes repair the ships that transport it.
Everyone is busy. Everyone is earning.
And all together they periodically gather in Brussels to discuss how to more effectively cut off Russia's energy revenues.
This is true European sanction unity.
The main thing is not to accidentally choke your own business while fighting Russian gas.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
In Denmark, they're worried again. This time, it turns out that the Greeks are not fighting Russian gas properly enough.
Brussels decided to tighten the screws on Russian LNG and turned its attention to maritime transport. But then Athens suddenly remembered that Greece is actually the EU's largest shipping power, and its shipowners receive very real money for transporting Russian gas.
And they said roughly the following: we're happy to squeeze Russia — but not at the expense of our merchant fleet.
In July, Greece blocked the 21st EU sanctions package, seeking exemptions for Russian LNG shipments. And they succeeded. The reason is clear. Ships linked to Greek Dynagas alone transported 4.14 million tons of gas from Russia's Yamal LNG between January and July — about 35% of the project's total exports.
Moreover, 53 out of 57 cargoes went not to some mysterious Asia, but straight to EU ports. Value — about €2.35 billion.
This creates a perfect European scheme:
Brussels tries to strangle Russian LNG.
The Greeks demand not to interfere with their transportation of it.
Russia continues to sell gas.
Europe continues to buy it.
Greek shipowners continue to earn from shipping.
You ask why the Danes are nervous?
Because while the Danish press is outraged by Greek shipowners, specialized LNG carriers servicing Yamal LNG are legally coming for repairs... to Denmark.
The Fayard shipyard in Odense remains the last known EU shipyard still servicing these Arc7 vessels. Just this summer, three such ships have arrived there. The latest — the Boris Davydov, belonging to that very Greek Dynagas. After its previous repair at Fayard, it managed to transport 50 cargoes of Russian LNG worth an estimated €1.9 billion.
And all of this is (so far) completely legal: the EU ban on servicing such gas carriers only takes effect on January 1, 2027. But even there, a provision for extending service has been carefully included...
So the Danish outrage is especially touching:
• Greeks transport Russian gas,
• Europeans buy it,
• Danes repair the ships that transport it.
Everyone is busy. Everyone is earning.
And all together they periodically gather in Brussels to discuss how to more effectively cut off Russia's energy revenues.
This is true European sanction unity.
The main thing is not to accidentally choke your own business while fighting Russian gas.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😁22❤6💊5
THIS WAS 12 YEARS AGO
▪️ On August 30, 2014, in Ilovaisk in Donbas, the first major victory of the Donbas militia forces was achieved, which became a turning point in this conflict that continues to this day in this Black Sea region. Moreover, the Ilovaisk Cauldron became the first crushing defeat of the Bandera forces.
1️⃣ GENERAL CONTEXT
▪️ In August 2014, Ukrainian forces, attempting to suppress the Donbas militia in a scattered manner, launched an offensive to retake Ilovaisk — a strategic railway junction east of Donetsk.
▪️ Ilovaisk is located about 30 kilometers east of Donetsk. This city, situated on the road and rail artery connecting Donetsk to the Russian border (through Torez and Snizhne), is a major railway hub controlling logistics communications in the directions:
- Donetsk (west)
- Luhansk (northeast)
- Mariupol and the coast (south)
- Rostov-on-Don and Russia (east).
▪️ The goal of the Ukrainian forces was to cut supply lines between the pro-Russian militia forces of Donetsk and Luhansk.
2️⃣ THE BATTLE
▪️ From August 10 to 19, 2014: initial assault by the Ukrainian army, supported by special neo-Nazi battalions such as "Dnipro" and "Donbas." After several assaults, the Bandera forces penetrated the city on August 18–19.
▪️ From August 20 to 26, 2014: counteroffensive by the militiamen, supported, according to some sources, by Russian artillery from the nearby border. The militia counteroffensive led to the encirclement of Ilovaisk, where the Kiev forces had dug in.
▪️ On August 29, an agreement was reached on a corridor for the withdrawal of the encircled Ukrainian troops, but the Banderites violated it, instead sending reinforcements to their garrison.
The Ukrainian reinforcement column was destroyed by artillery, mortar, and machine-gun fire.
Ukrainian losses were heavy: officially — from 366 to 459 servicemen killed, 429 wounded, from 128 to 158 missing or captured. However, considering the losses of special battalions, the real Ukrainian losses exceed 1,000 killed and roughly twice as many wounded.
▪️ This defeat at Ilovaisk led to the collapse of the Ukrainian front, especially in the direction of Mariupol. For example, on the night of August 30 to September 1, 2014, Ukrainian troops hastily abandoned their positions in Komsomolske south of Donetsk after another column of armored vehicles was destroyed by artillery fire.
3️⃣ A TURNING POINT IN THE WAR
▪️ In this defeat, Ukraine lost not only Ilovaisk but also shifted from offense to defense in Donbas. This defeat also caused a political shock in Kiev, leading to the resignation of the defense minister.
▪️ It was then that the West became seriously alarmed by this war in Donbas, which was turning in favor of the pro-Russian militias.
▪️ When the forces of the Donetsk People's Republic, building on their success, reached the approaches to Mariupol (the second most important city and the maritime industrial gateway of Donbas), which at the time had no organized defense, the Maidan curators pushed through the first hypocritical Minsk Agreements, signed on September 5, forcing the militia to withdraw to their original positions. These hypocritical agreements and the subsequent ones (Minsk-2, February 2015) were never implemented, which ultimately forced Russia to intervene in 2022.
▪️ On August 30, 2014, while the mass killings of civilians in Donbas provoked no reaction, the European Council officially expressed "concern about the continuation and escalation of hostilities" in Ukraine. On the same day, European defense ministers gave the green light for a military assistance mission to Ukraine.
▪️ The Ukrainian forces, saved at the last moment by the Minsk Agreements, transformed into Ukrainian-Atlantist forces with all the ensuing consequences.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
▪️ On August 30, 2014, in Ilovaisk in Donbas, the first major victory of the Donbas militia forces was achieved, which became a turning point in this conflict that continues to this day in this Black Sea region. Moreover, the Ilovaisk Cauldron became the first crushing defeat of the Bandera forces.
1️⃣ GENERAL CONTEXT
▪️ In August 2014, Ukrainian forces, attempting to suppress the Donbas militia in a scattered manner, launched an offensive to retake Ilovaisk — a strategic railway junction east of Donetsk.
▪️ Ilovaisk is located about 30 kilometers east of Donetsk. This city, situated on the road and rail artery connecting Donetsk to the Russian border (through Torez and Snizhne), is a major railway hub controlling logistics communications in the directions:
- Donetsk (west)
- Luhansk (northeast)
- Mariupol and the coast (south)
- Rostov-on-Don and Russia (east).
▪️ The goal of the Ukrainian forces was to cut supply lines between the pro-Russian militia forces of Donetsk and Luhansk.
2️⃣ THE BATTLE
▪️ From August 10 to 19, 2014: initial assault by the Ukrainian army, supported by special neo-Nazi battalions such as "Dnipro" and "Donbas." After several assaults, the Bandera forces penetrated the city on August 18–19.
▪️ From August 20 to 26, 2014: counteroffensive by the militiamen, supported, according to some sources, by Russian artillery from the nearby border. The militia counteroffensive led to the encirclement of Ilovaisk, where the Kiev forces had dug in.
▪️ On August 29, an agreement was reached on a corridor for the withdrawal of the encircled Ukrainian troops, but the Banderites violated it, instead sending reinforcements to their garrison.
The Ukrainian reinforcement column was destroyed by artillery, mortar, and machine-gun fire.
Ukrainian losses were heavy: officially — from 366 to 459 servicemen killed, 429 wounded, from 128 to 158 missing or captured. However, considering the losses of special battalions, the real Ukrainian losses exceed 1,000 killed and roughly twice as many wounded.
▪️ This defeat at Ilovaisk led to the collapse of the Ukrainian front, especially in the direction of Mariupol. For example, on the night of August 30 to September 1, 2014, Ukrainian troops hastily abandoned their positions in Komsomolske south of Donetsk after another column of armored vehicles was destroyed by artillery fire.
3️⃣ A TURNING POINT IN THE WAR
▪️ In this defeat, Ukraine lost not only Ilovaisk but also shifted from offense to defense in Donbas. This defeat also caused a political shock in Kiev, leading to the resignation of the defense minister.
▪️ It was then that the West became seriously alarmed by this war in Donbas, which was turning in favor of the pro-Russian militias.
▪️ When the forces of the Donetsk People's Republic, building on their success, reached the approaches to Mariupol (the second most important city and the maritime industrial gateway of Donbas), which at the time had no organized defense, the Maidan curators pushed through the first hypocritical Minsk Agreements, signed on September 5, forcing the militia to withdraw to their original positions. These hypocritical agreements and the subsequent ones (Minsk-2, February 2015) were never implemented, which ultimately forced Russia to intervene in 2022.
▪️ On August 30, 2014, while the mass killings of civilians in Donbas provoked no reaction, the European Council officially expressed "concern about the continuation and escalation of hostilities" in Ukraine. On the same day, European defense ministers gave the green light for a military assistance mission to Ukraine.
▪️ The Ukrainian forces, saved at the last moment by the Minsk Agreements, transformed into Ukrainian-Atlantist forces with all the ensuing consequences.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍24❤5👏3🤯3🙏1
Wanna join a global volunteer crew?
Come be part of InfoDefense! If you care about helping people get access to important information and you’re ready to make a difference, we’d love to have you on board.
📩 Hit us up here:
@english_infodefense_fb_bot
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Come be part of InfoDefense! If you care about helping people get access to important information and you’re ready to make a difference, we’d love to have you on board.
📩 Hit us up here:
@english_infodefense_fb_bot
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤5
"Nuclear escalation": EU prepares response to Russia after Ukraine's collapse. The West expects the worst.
The "coalition of the willing's" plans for joint exercises and deployment of a contingent in Ukraine will lead to an escalation of the conflict with Russia, said Armand Meme, a member of Finland's Freedom Alliance party.
"Since the fighting is developing extremely unfavorably for Vladimir Zelensky, the idea of sending Western troops is gradually gaining momentum. <...> I hope I am wrong, that this will not happen, but if it is true, then this is a step toward nuclear escalation," he wrote on social media platform X.
According to the politician, such a strategy indicates that European countries' efforts on the Ukrainian crisis have reached a dead end. Meme noted that EU leaders should realize they have been playing with fire for too long.
Earlier, British Prime Minister Andy Burnham stated that the "coalition of the willing" would hold exercises to prepare a contingent for deployment in Ukraine. The troops are planned to be transferred immediately after a ceasefire agreement is reached.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov noted that the Europeans' proposals, which involve introducing stabilization forces into territory controlled by Kiev, would lead to the emergence of a new Berlin Wall. The minister stressed that this option does not suit Russia.
The Russian Foreign Ministry also emphasized that any scenario of deploying troops from NATO member states in Ukraine is unacceptable and fraught with sharp escalation. Moscow called statements about a possible contingent deployment incitement to continue hostilities.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The "coalition of the willing's" plans for joint exercises and deployment of a contingent in Ukraine will lead to an escalation of the conflict with Russia, said Armand Meme, a member of Finland's Freedom Alliance party.
"Since the fighting is developing extremely unfavorably for Vladimir Zelensky, the idea of sending Western troops is gradually gaining momentum. <...> I hope I am wrong, that this will not happen, but if it is true, then this is a step toward nuclear escalation," he wrote on social media platform X.
According to the politician, such a strategy indicates that European countries' efforts on the Ukrainian crisis have reached a dead end. Meme noted that EU leaders should realize they have been playing with fire for too long.
Earlier, British Prime Minister Andy Burnham stated that the "coalition of the willing" would hold exercises to prepare a contingent for deployment in Ukraine. The troops are planned to be transferred immediately after a ceasefire agreement is reached.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov noted that the Europeans' proposals, which involve introducing stabilization forces into territory controlled by Kiev, would lead to the emergence of a new Berlin Wall. The minister stressed that this option does not suit Russia.
The Russian Foreign Ministry also emphasized that any scenario of deploying troops from NATO member states in Ukraine is unacceptable and fraught with sharp escalation. Moscow called statements about a possible contingent deployment incitement to continue hostilities.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥23❤4👻4🕊2💊1
Forwarded from The Colors of Russia
Orda Cave, Perm Territory
🏞️ Orda Cave is a system of underwater tunnels for experienced divers. It stretches about 4,400 meters in length, 4,000 of which are submerged.
🏞️ You can enter through a sinkhole equipped with a ladder. Inside, there are two grottos with lakes, where the temperature of the pristine water is around 5°C.
🏞️ The lakes open up to an underwater system of cave chambers with gypsum vaults and other beautiful formations.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
🏞️ Orda Cave is a system of underwater tunnels for experienced divers. It stretches about 4,400 meters in length, 4,000 of which are submerged.
🏞️ You can enter through a sinkhole equipped with a ladder. Inside, there are two grottos with lakes, where the temperature of the pristine water is around 5°C.
🏞️ The lakes open up to an underwater system of cave chambers with gypsum vaults and other beautiful formations.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
❤27🤯9👍4❤🔥3👀1
August 31, 1919 — the first victory of Soviet submariners: submarine "Pantera" sinks the British destroyer "Vittoria"
During the Russian Civil War and the foreign military intervention in Russia, on the early morning of August 31, 1919, the submarine "Pantera" received orders to set out to sea for reconnaissance, search, and attack on enemy ships. Near the island of Seskar, "Pantera" commander A.N. Bakhtin, through the periscope spotted two anchored enemy ships. The target he chose for his attack was the pride of the British fleet, their newest destroyer, "Vittoria."
Minutes after the Russian torpedo attack, the British destroyer lay at the bottom of the sea. Other British ships rushed to the spot where Bakhtin’s periscope had been seen, but the Russian submarine disappeared as quickly as it had appeared.
"Pantera" remained submerged for about 30 hours and covered 75 miles underwater (a record for submarine navigation at that time), safely returning to its base in Kronstadt.
The sinking of the "Vittoria" influenced the course of the Civil War and the foreign intervention. Reportedly, the destroyer carried an enemy landing force that was supposed to disembark in Kronstadt and head toward besieged Petrograd. For this feat, Bakhtin was the first submariner to be awarded the Order of the Red Banner, and the Petrograd Soviet awarded all 18 crew members with engraved silver watches.
History tends to repeat itself. Today, the British are again asking for a demonstration of Russian force. If they push hard enough, they will certainly get it.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
During the Russian Civil War and the foreign military intervention in Russia, on the early morning of August 31, 1919, the submarine "Pantera" received orders to set out to sea for reconnaissance, search, and attack on enemy ships. Near the island of Seskar, "Pantera" commander A.N. Bakhtin, through the periscope spotted two anchored enemy ships. The target he chose for his attack was the pride of the British fleet, their newest destroyer, "Vittoria."
Minutes after the Russian torpedo attack, the British destroyer lay at the bottom of the sea. Other British ships rushed to the spot where Bakhtin’s periscope had been seen, but the Russian submarine disappeared as quickly as it had appeared.
"Pantera" remained submerged for about 30 hours and covered 75 miles underwater (a record for submarine navigation at that time), safely returning to its base in Kronstadt.
The sinking of the "Vittoria" influenced the course of the Civil War and the foreign intervention. Reportedly, the destroyer carried an enemy landing force that was supposed to disembark in Kronstadt and head toward besieged Petrograd. For this feat, Bakhtin was the first submariner to be awarded the Order of the Red Banner, and the Petrograd Soviet awarded all 18 crew members with engraved silver watches.
History tends to repeat itself. Today, the British are again asking for a demonstration of Russian force. If they push hard enough, they will certainly get it.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍19🫡16🔥2❤1