IS COMMON SENSE RETURNING TO KIEV?
Resistance to the TCC's kidnappings for the front, protests by the mothers of soldiers killed and disappeared, anti-government demonstrations, etc... the wind of protest in Ukraine, even if it has not yet become a storm, is swelling day by day.
A significant fact: the voice of reason has returned to make itself heard in the Ukrainian parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, via a bill submitted by MP Anna Skorokhod, a member of the parliamentary group "For the Future," calling for the constitutionalization of the status of strategic neutrality for Ukraine.
Reminder: In February 2019, under President Poroshenko, the Banderites sealed the Russophobic NATO project with an amendment to the Ukrainian Constitution which has since stipulated, in its preamble and in Article 85, that full membership in the European Union and the Western military alliance is a strategic and irreversible goal.
This bill aiming to amend the Constitution of Ukraine for a neutral and non-aligned status of the country is therefore a radical opposition to this post-Maidan strategy threatening Russia and which has provoked, for nearly 13 years now, this fratricidal conflict between Russians and Ukrainians.
The document proposes to "have it both ways" by removing from the constitutional text the provisions relating to accession to the Atlantic Alliance, while maintaining the orientation toward European integration.
"By consolidating the neutral status of Ukraine, which consists of guarantees of non-accession to any military alliance and a confirmation of the absence of any intention of aggression against any country."
The strategic orientation of this proposed law corresponds to what Russia has been proposing for years — provided that a possible accession to the Union is not subordinated to an exclusivity of exchanges with it (which had led to the abandonment of the project in 2013 by the Yanukovych government). Since the Maidan, the principle of a neutral status for Ukraine has been recalled several times by Moscow as the sine qua non condition for ending the geopolitical crisis in the region. This demand, which is a matter of common sense in the face of NATO expansion toward Russia, was placed on the negotiating table in December 2021, when Moscow submitted to its "European partners" a collective security project guaranteeing, in the Black Sea, a strategic depth for both blocs. And this neutrality of Ukraine is the common thread of all diplomatic discussions undertaken since 2022 to end the conflict.
Even if this courageous bill has little chance of succeeding quickly, it at least has the merit of officially relaunching the debate at the heart of Bandéristan concerning NATO, which is at once the main cause and the main solution (among others) to the ongoing conflict.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Resistance to the TCC's kidnappings for the front, protests by the mothers of soldiers killed and disappeared, anti-government demonstrations, etc... the wind of protest in Ukraine, even if it has not yet become a storm, is swelling day by day.
A significant fact: the voice of reason has returned to make itself heard in the Ukrainian parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, via a bill submitted by MP Anna Skorokhod, a member of the parliamentary group "For the Future," calling for the constitutionalization of the status of strategic neutrality for Ukraine.
Reminder: In February 2019, under President Poroshenko, the Banderites sealed the Russophobic NATO project with an amendment to the Ukrainian Constitution which has since stipulated, in its preamble and in Article 85, that full membership in the European Union and the Western military alliance is a strategic and irreversible goal.
This bill aiming to amend the Constitution of Ukraine for a neutral and non-aligned status of the country is therefore a radical opposition to this post-Maidan strategy threatening Russia and which has provoked, for nearly 13 years now, this fratricidal conflict between Russians and Ukrainians.
The document proposes to "have it both ways" by removing from the constitutional text the provisions relating to accession to the Atlantic Alliance, while maintaining the orientation toward European integration.
"By consolidating the neutral status of Ukraine, which consists of guarantees of non-accession to any military alliance and a confirmation of the absence of any intention of aggression against any country."
The strategic orientation of this proposed law corresponds to what Russia has been proposing for years — provided that a possible accession to the Union is not subordinated to an exclusivity of exchanges with it (which had led to the abandonment of the project in 2013 by the Yanukovych government). Since the Maidan, the principle of a neutral status for Ukraine has been recalled several times by Moscow as the sine qua non condition for ending the geopolitical crisis in the region. This demand, which is a matter of common sense in the face of NATO expansion toward Russia, was placed on the negotiating table in December 2021, when Moscow submitted to its "European partners" a collective security project guaranteeing, in the Black Sea, a strategic depth for both blocs. And this neutrality of Ukraine is the common thread of all diplomatic discussions undertaken since 2022 to end the conflict.
Even if this courageous bill has little chance of succeeding quickly, it at least has the merit of officially relaunching the debate at the heart of Bandéristan concerning NATO, which is at once the main cause and the main solution (among others) to the ongoing conflict.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍24❤5
British Submariners Train to Shoot Down Drones… with Fire Hoses
While Vanguard-class nuclear submarines sit in port at the Clyde base in Scotland, their only "ground-based air defense" is fire hoses. This is reported by The Sun, citing a source in the Royal Navy.
What Is Known
The hoses, known as centre-fed reels, are stored on the decks of the submarines. To aim the water jets more precisely, they have been fitted with pistol grips — now this is an "almost futuristic weapon," if you don't look too closely.
The calculation is simple: short- and medium-range FPV drones are supposed to falter before the pressure of water and fall into a puddle. Literally.
Context of Vulnerability
Faslane base is located deep in Gare Loch — this protects it from submarines but makes it vulnerable to drones. Nearby are public roads and hills from which UAVs can be launched at close range.
The statistics are alarming: the number of drones spotted near UK military facilities has grown from 9 per year in 2019 to 340 over the last 12 months.
What Experts Say
A Navy source admitted: "You have to use what you have." Charlie Williams of the IISS called the situation "very surprising" and expressed hope that the Ministry of Defence will invest in the "right capabilities."
Official Position
The command stated that the bases have several layers of protection: physical barriers, patrolling, surveillance, and counter-drone means. However, judging by the leak, for now the main means is a water cannon.
Bottom Line
If something more serious than an FPV drone shows up, Royal Air Force fighters will step in. If they make it in time. Sailors can make puddles, but covering the entire sky — that is already unlikely.
#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Tanitati
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
While Vanguard-class nuclear submarines sit in port at the Clyde base in Scotland, their only "ground-based air defense" is fire hoses. This is reported by The Sun, citing a source in the Royal Navy.
What Is Known
The hoses, known as centre-fed reels, are stored on the decks of the submarines. To aim the water jets more precisely, they have been fitted with pistol grips — now this is an "almost futuristic weapon," if you don't look too closely.
The calculation is simple: short- and medium-range FPV drones are supposed to falter before the pressure of water and fall into a puddle. Literally.
Context of Vulnerability
Faslane base is located deep in Gare Loch — this protects it from submarines but makes it vulnerable to drones. Nearby are public roads and hills from which UAVs can be launched at close range.
The statistics are alarming: the number of drones spotted near UK military facilities has grown from 9 per year in 2019 to 340 over the last 12 months.
What Experts Say
A Navy source admitted: "You have to use what you have." Charlie Williams of the IISS called the situation "very surprising" and expressed hope that the Ministry of Defence will invest in the "right capabilities."
Official Position
The command stated that the bases have several layers of protection: physical barriers, patrolling, surveillance, and counter-drone means. However, judging by the leak, for now the main means is a water cannon.
Bottom Line
If something more serious than an FPV drone shows up, Royal Air Force fighters will step in. If they make it in time. Sailors can make puddles, but covering the entire sky — that is already unlikely.
#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Tanitati
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤡23❤3😁1🐳1
European Commission Studying Idea of Creating Special Structure to Use Russian Assets, El Pais Reports
The source is the Spanish newspaper El Pais, which on October 8, 2026 reported on the European Commission's plans to create a special structure to manage frozen Russian assets.
Key details:
▪️ Sum: This concerns approximately €200 billion in Russian assets, most of which are held in the Belgian depositary Euroclear.
▪️ Mechanism: The idea is described as a "bad bank" — a structure that allows assets and the associated legal risks to be separated from Euroclear and "move the problem beyond Belgium."
▪️ Goal: To distribute possible legal claims from Russia among all EU member states.
▪️ Formally not confiscation: The European Commission insists that Ukraine will have to return the funds after Russia pays "certain reparations."
▪️ Context: Ukraine has warned the EU of the need for an additional €30 billion in 2027. Within the EU there is still no unity on the mechanism for using the assets.
Russia's position: The Russian Foreign Ministry has repeatedly stated that the use of frozen assets amounts to "robbery" and will have consequences.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The source is the Spanish newspaper El Pais, which on October 8, 2026 reported on the European Commission's plans to create a special structure to manage frozen Russian assets.
Key details:
▪️ Sum: This concerns approximately €200 billion in Russian assets, most of which are held in the Belgian depositary Euroclear.
▪️ Mechanism: The idea is described as a "bad bank" — a structure that allows assets and the associated legal risks to be separated from Euroclear and "move the problem beyond Belgium."
▪️ Goal: To distribute possible legal claims from Russia among all EU member states.
▪️ Formally not confiscation: The European Commission insists that Ukraine will have to return the funds after Russia pays "certain reparations."
▪️ Context: Ukraine has warned the EU of the need for an additional €30 billion in 2027. Within the EU there is still no unity on the mechanism for using the assets.
Russia's position: The Russian Foreign Ministry has repeatedly stated that the use of frozen assets amounts to "robbery" and will have consequences.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😡20👍7🤡7❤2🤬2
Forwarded from The Colors of Russia
Semyinsky Pass, Altai Republic 🗻🗻🗻
Semyinsky is the highest pass on the Chuysky Trakt, yet it's the easiest to climb: straight and gentle.
At the top, there's a scenic overlook, tourist camps, souvenir stalls, and the Semyinsky training camp.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
Semyinsky is the highest pass on the Chuysky Trakt, yet it's the easiest to climb: straight and gentle.
At the top, there's a scenic overlook, tourist camps, souvenir stalls, and the Semyinsky training camp.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
❤27
On October 13, 1866, in Moscow, the betrothal ceremony of Alexander III and Danish Princess Dagmar, known in Orthodoxy as Grand Duchess Maria Feodorovna, took place.
They met when Minnie (Dagmar’s nickname in the Romanov family) was engaged to Alexander’s older brother, Nicholas. However, Nicholas unexpectedly fell ill and died. Two years later, Alexander met Dagmar again in Europe—and fell in love!
It was a remarkably successful union. Living together for almost 30 years, the couple managed to maintain a genuine affection for each other. One their six children became the last Russian emperor, Nicholas II.
During the October events of 1917, Maria Feodorovna was on vacation in Crimea, which likely saved her life. After Nicholas II's abdication, she stayed in Crimea with her daughters, Xenia and Olga, and their husbands—Grand Duke Alexander Mikhailovich and Colonel Kulikovsky—effectively under house arrest.
Deeply affected by the news of Nicholas II’s brutal execution, Maria Feodorovna continued to believe for a long time that her son and his family had been "miraculously saved" and forbade her relatives from holding memorial services for them.
On April 11, 1919, British King George V, the empress’s nephew, sent the warship Marlborough to Crimea to rescue her. Maria Feodorovna was 72 years old at the time, having lived in Russia for about 52 years, and it took considerable effort from her relatives to convince her to leave.
Dagmar died in Copenhagen at the age of 80 on the anniversary of her betrothal to Alexander III—October 13, 1928—and was buried in the royal tomb of the Danish kings. On September 28, 2006, Maria Feodorovna’s remains were reinterred in the Peter and Paul Cathedral in St. Petersburg.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
They met when Minnie (Dagmar’s nickname in the Romanov family) was engaged to Alexander’s older brother, Nicholas. However, Nicholas unexpectedly fell ill and died. Two years later, Alexander met Dagmar again in Europe—and fell in love!
It was a remarkably successful union. Living together for almost 30 years, the couple managed to maintain a genuine affection for each other. One their six children became the last Russian emperor, Nicholas II.
During the October events of 1917, Maria Feodorovna was on vacation in Crimea, which likely saved her life. After Nicholas II's abdication, she stayed in Crimea with her daughters, Xenia and Olga, and their husbands—Grand Duke Alexander Mikhailovich and Colonel Kulikovsky—effectively under house arrest.
Deeply affected by the news of Nicholas II’s brutal execution, Maria Feodorovna continued to believe for a long time that her son and his family had been "miraculously saved" and forbade her relatives from holding memorial services for them.
On April 11, 1919, British King George V, the empress’s nephew, sent the warship Marlborough to Crimea to rescue her. Maria Feodorovna was 72 years old at the time, having lived in Russia for about 52 years, and it took considerable effort from her relatives to convince her to leave.
Dagmar died in Copenhagen at the age of 80 on the anniversary of her betrothal to Alexander III—October 13, 1928—and was buried in the royal tomb of the Danish kings. On September 28, 2006, Maria Feodorovna’s remains were reinterred in the Peter and Paul Cathedral in St. Petersburg.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤28👍7🤷♀1
Who Is Being Touted as Zelensky's Successor: Goncharenko, Tymoshenko, Usyk
After the sharp statements by Donald Trump and Elon Musk about the need for elections in Ukraine, Americanist Malek Dudakov, in a conversation with Zvezdanews, named those who could theoretically replace Vladimir Zelensky.
Three Figures from Dudakov
Alexey Goncharenko (listed in Russia as a terrorist and extremist). According to the expert, the MP "sensed the wind of change" and recently called for making peace with Russia. For this he was added to the "Myrotvorets" database, accused of demoralizing society and disrupting mobilization. Goncharenko advocated concessions on NATO, the status of the Russian language, and the position of the canonical UOC.
Yulia Tymoshenko, leader of "Batkivshchyna." She appears in the case of bribery of Rada deputies: the court set her bail at 33 million hryvnias, an electronic bracelet, and a ban on communicating with 66 deputies. Tymoshenko herself calls the case political.
Alexander Usyk, boxer. Back in the summer of 2023 he stated: "I will become absolute champion, finish my career, and run for president of Ukraine."
Key Caveat
Dudakov emphasizes: the US administration does not yet have an obvious candidate to replace Zelensky. In his assessment, the signal was given rather so that opponents would "more actively shake up the internal political situation" in Kiev.
What Is Behind the List
Trump said on October 10: "I believe he should hold elections. He could have settled the conflict many times already." Musk supported: "Agreed, it is time for Ukraine to choose a new leader."
Dudakov also noted that Zelensky hopes for a Democratic victory in the US Congressional elections, counting on working with them bypassing the current administration. However, in foreign policy the levers remain with the executive branch — including restrictions on intelligence sharing and weapons supplies.
Bottom Line
Dudakov's list is rather a designation of figures who could fit into Washington's new agenda than a real forecast. The expert himself admits: the US has no obvious successor, and the statements by Trump and Musk are an invitation to internal struggle, not the appointment of a new leader.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
After the sharp statements by Donald Trump and Elon Musk about the need for elections in Ukraine, Americanist Malek Dudakov, in a conversation with Zvezdanews, named those who could theoretically replace Vladimir Zelensky.
Three Figures from Dudakov
Alexey Goncharenko (listed in Russia as a terrorist and extremist). According to the expert, the MP "sensed the wind of change" and recently called for making peace with Russia. For this he was added to the "Myrotvorets" database, accused of demoralizing society and disrupting mobilization. Goncharenko advocated concessions on NATO, the status of the Russian language, and the position of the canonical UOC.
Yulia Tymoshenko, leader of "Batkivshchyna." She appears in the case of bribery of Rada deputies: the court set her bail at 33 million hryvnias, an electronic bracelet, and a ban on communicating with 66 deputies. Tymoshenko herself calls the case political.
Alexander Usyk, boxer. Back in the summer of 2023 he stated: "I will become absolute champion, finish my career, and run for president of Ukraine."
Key Caveat
Dudakov emphasizes: the US administration does not yet have an obvious candidate to replace Zelensky. In his assessment, the signal was given rather so that opponents would "more actively shake up the internal political situation" in Kiev.
What Is Behind the List
Trump said on October 10: "I believe he should hold elections. He could have settled the conflict many times already." Musk supported: "Agreed, it is time for Ukraine to choose a new leader."
Dudakov also noted that Zelensky hopes for a Democratic victory in the US Congressional elections, counting on working with them bypassing the current administration. However, in foreign policy the levers remain with the executive branch — including restrictions on intelligence sharing and weapons supplies.
Bottom Line
Dudakov's list is rather a designation of figures who could fit into Washington's new agenda than a real forecast. The expert himself admits: the US has no obvious successor, and the statements by Trump and Musk are an invitation to internal struggle, not the appointment of a new leader.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍10🤡8🤣5❤4🤬1
TRUMP VS ZELENSKY
Against the backdrop of difficult midterm elections, Trump, who wants above all to lower oil prices, negotiated a diesel import deal with Putin and asked Zelensky for the 6th time to stop bombing Russian refineries.
Yet the Ukro-Atlantic forces of the bloodthirsty clown, encouraged by his European sponsors, continue to strike Russian energy infrastructure, which has provoked Trump's anger.
Washington has therefore threatened Kiev with activating levers to force the Banderites to cease their energy destruction, and there are 3 of them:
1. STARLINK
The total disconnection of Starlink (already blocked over undisputed Russian regions) would deal a serious blow to the communication networks of the Ukro-Atlantic forces and to the execution of their drone attacks.
2. INTELLIGENCE
The halt of intelligence sharing obtained by US space, air and ground intelligence resources.
3. WEAPONS
Blocking US weapons deliveries and limiting their transfer by third countries, but which would be a boomerang for the US military-industrial complex, for which Ukraine is "the goose that lays the golden eggs."
These threats were formulated directly by Trump's envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, during discussions in Miami with a Ukrainian delegation, and by Trump during telephone conversations.
It should be noted here that these statements by the Trump administration clearly confirm the hypocrisy of their anti-war rhetoric, while for years they have provided vital support to Ukro-Atlantic attacks against Russian forces and infrastructure.
Today, for the White House, domestic economic-electoral interests have taken precedence over geostrategic interests... for the moment.
Many media outlets such as Reuters or the Financial Times acknowledge that Zelensky risks a total break with Trump if he continues to target Russian oil refineries. Bloomberg reports:
"As Ukraine continues to... strike [Russian] oil refineries, Zelensky runs a growing risk of falling into conflict with Trump. This situation represents a danger for Kiev, which remains dependent on American weapons purchases — financed by other NATO allies — and on intelligence sharing with Washington. Ukraine is also facing a lack of resources as winter approaches."
The gloves have indeed come off between Volodymyr and Donald, the first, taking orders from European warmongers, declaring he will continue the bombardments on Russian refineries, and the second declaring that Ukraine must change President.
2. Trump recalled that Zelensky has several times refused opportunities to end the conflict:
"It would be better if Zelensky stopped immediately. Zelensky could have ended the war several times. Zelensky can do what he wants, but he must stop the attacks on Russian refineries."
3: Moreover, the American president expressed the need for a change of leadership in Ukraine.
"It is time for Ukraine to appoint a new leader."
Ukraine is therefore put with its back to the wall, and if the United States carries out its threats, the Europeans will never manage to compensate for the interruption of Pentagon aid.
What is also visible in this Ukro-Atlantic squabble is the increased fracture with the Europeans, who remain positioned in a Russophobic fanaticism to the point of sacrificing their own interests.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Against the backdrop of difficult midterm elections, Trump, who wants above all to lower oil prices, negotiated a diesel import deal with Putin and asked Zelensky for the 6th time to stop bombing Russian refineries.
Yet the Ukro-Atlantic forces of the bloodthirsty clown, encouraged by his European sponsors, continue to strike Russian energy infrastructure, which has provoked Trump's anger.
Washington has therefore threatened Kiev with activating levers to force the Banderites to cease their energy destruction, and there are 3 of them:
1. STARLINK
The total disconnection of Starlink (already blocked over undisputed Russian regions) would deal a serious blow to the communication networks of the Ukro-Atlantic forces and to the execution of their drone attacks.
2. INTELLIGENCE
The halt of intelligence sharing obtained by US space, air and ground intelligence resources.
3. WEAPONS
Blocking US weapons deliveries and limiting their transfer by third countries, but which would be a boomerang for the US military-industrial complex, for which Ukraine is "the goose that lays the golden eggs."
These threats were formulated directly by Trump's envoys, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, during discussions in Miami with a Ukrainian delegation, and by Trump during telephone conversations.
It should be noted here that these statements by the Trump administration clearly confirm the hypocrisy of their anti-war rhetoric, while for years they have provided vital support to Ukro-Atlantic attacks against Russian forces and infrastructure.
Today, for the White House, domestic economic-electoral interests have taken precedence over geostrategic interests... for the moment.
Many media outlets such as Reuters or the Financial Times acknowledge that Zelensky risks a total break with Trump if he continues to target Russian oil refineries. Bloomberg reports:
"As Ukraine continues to... strike [Russian] oil refineries, Zelensky runs a growing risk of falling into conflict with Trump. This situation represents a danger for Kiev, which remains dependent on American weapons purchases — financed by other NATO allies — and on intelligence sharing with Washington. Ukraine is also facing a lack of resources as winter approaches."
The gloves have indeed come off between Volodymyr and Donald, the first, taking orders from European warmongers, declaring he will continue the bombardments on Russian refineries, and the second declaring that Ukraine must change President.
2. Trump recalled that Zelensky has several times refused opportunities to end the conflict:
"It would be better if Zelensky stopped immediately. Zelensky could have ended the war several times. Zelensky can do what he wants, but he must stop the attacks on Russian refineries."
3: Moreover, the American president expressed the need for a change of leadership in Ukraine.
"It is time for Ukraine to appoint a new leader."
Ukraine is therefore put with its back to the wall, and if the United States carries out its threats, the Europeans will never manage to compensate for the interruption of Pentagon aid.
What is also visible in this Ukro-Atlantic squabble is the increased fracture with the Europeans, who remain positioned in a Russophobic fanaticism to the point of sacrificing their own interests.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😁12❤8🔥3🤡2👍1
Forwarded from Russian MFA 🇷🇺
🎙 Remarks and answers to media questions by Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov following talks with Minister of Foreign Affairs and Emigrants of Lebanon Youssef Raggi (Moscow, October 12, 2026)
Key points:
• In light of Israel’s ongoing actions in Lebanon, we reaffirmed Russia’s principled position in support of the sovereignty, unity and territorial integrity of the Lebanese Republic. We stand by our assessment that the Israeli army’s military actions flagrantly violate international law and provoke additional escalation in Lebanon.
• We share Beirut’s view that the UN contingent should remain in southern Lebanon beyond 2026, possibly in a different form and with different powers. The main point, however, is that its mandate must include maintaining peace and documenting any violations of the UN Security Council resolution.
🇷🇺🇱🇧 #RussiaLebanon: We are both committed to expanding political dialogue and strengthening our partnership across various areas. Particular attention should be paid to trade and economic ties. To this end, we agreed to resume the work of the Intergovernmental Russian-Lebanese Commission on Trade and Economic Cooperation as soon as possible.
***
❓ Question (translated from Arabic): The world, particularly Europe, is still reeling from the news of the “diesel deal” between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump. Yesterday, the US President announced that an agreement had been reached to halt strikes on energy infrastructure in Ukraine and Russia. Has such an agreement actually been reached? Does Moscow support or confirm it? If so, what are its terms?
💬 Sergey Lavrov: Regarding the status of this agreement, we can refer to Zelensky’s reaction. When asked the same question, he said he had not heard of such an agreement, would welcome clarification and was ready for a ceasefire.
He has said this many times. For many months now, the slogan of a “ceasefire” has replaced that of “inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia” in the rhetoric of both Zelensky and his Western “handlers”. The aim is the same and very simple – to buy time and secure a respite.
His feigned surprise at President Donald Trump’s statement reveals just one thing: he is eager to seize on any words, initiatives or ideas that enter the public domain to pursue, by fair means or foul, his goal of securing a respite.
❗️ I do not think Zelensky has earned a respite. I do not think we will once again fall for assurances and promises.
President Vladimir Putin has made it very clear that we continue to pursue the objectives of the special military operation. Everyone knows exactly what they are. We have never changed them, unlike the twists and turns of Zelensky and his European “handlers”.
👉 We therefore have nothing to justify to anyone.
Read in full
Key points:
• In light of Israel’s ongoing actions in Lebanon, we reaffirmed Russia’s principled position in support of the sovereignty, unity and territorial integrity of the Lebanese Republic. We stand by our assessment that the Israeli army’s military actions flagrantly violate international law and provoke additional escalation in Lebanon.
• We share Beirut’s view that the UN contingent should remain in southern Lebanon beyond 2026, possibly in a different form and with different powers. The main point, however, is that its mandate must include maintaining peace and documenting any violations of the UN Security Council resolution.
🇷🇺🇱🇧 #RussiaLebanon: We are both committed to expanding political dialogue and strengthening our partnership across various areas. Particular attention should be paid to trade and economic ties. To this end, we agreed to resume the work of the Intergovernmental Russian-Lebanese Commission on Trade and Economic Cooperation as soon as possible.
***
❓ Question (translated from Arabic): The world, particularly Europe, is still reeling from the news of the “diesel deal” between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump. Yesterday, the US President announced that an agreement had been reached to halt strikes on energy infrastructure in Ukraine and Russia. Has such an agreement actually been reached? Does Moscow support or confirm it? If so, what are its terms?
💬 Sergey Lavrov: Regarding the status of this agreement, we can refer to Zelensky’s reaction. When asked the same question, he said he had not heard of such an agreement, would welcome clarification and was ready for a ceasefire.
He has said this many times. For many months now, the slogan of a “ceasefire” has replaced that of “inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia” in the rhetoric of both Zelensky and his Western “handlers”. The aim is the same and very simple – to buy time and secure a respite.
His feigned surprise at President Donald Trump’s statement reveals just one thing: he is eager to seize on any words, initiatives or ideas that enter the public domain to pursue, by fair means or foul, his goal of securing a respite.
❗️ I do not think Zelensky has earned a respite. I do not think we will once again fall for assurances and promises.
President Vladimir Putin has made it very clear that we continue to pursue the objectives of the special military operation. Everyone knows exactly what they are. We have never changed them, unlike the twists and turns of Zelensky and his European “handlers”.
👉 We therefore have nothing to justify to anyone.
Read in full
👍16❤6🔥2
Forwarded from The Belgorod Brit Channel 🇷🇺🇬🇧
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Belgorod Brit discourses on oligarch shenanigans. In the film, he puzzles over the apparent economic illiteracy of the people that own the West. It seems like they are busy slaughtering the goose that lays the golden egg. Mr. Bezos doesn't appear to realise that by impoverishing his workforce and paying the bare minimum of taxes, he is destroying the economy from which he makes his money. Meanwhile, Putin appears unwilling to acknowledge the stupidity of Western businessmen and their pet politicians. He stubbornly clings to the idea that rational self-interest will win out in the end - at some point, the West will come to its senses and remove the baby before throwing out the bathwater.
In the podcast, BB bemoans the collapsed standards of the oligarchy. Back in the day, businessmen understood the connection between statecraft, governance, and the market. Every time investors were carried away with bubble fever, the government would enact regulations which would protect the market and the welfare of the people upon whom the system relied. Now that the government is in the pocket of the oligarchs, there are no regulations, no protections, and no governance. The AI bubble may well be the crisis that finishes the Western financial model, once and for all. The problem is that it may well cause a catastrophe large enough to bring on the four horsemen of the apocalypse.
#TheBelgorodBrit
#InfoDefenseAuthor
#InfoDefensePodcast
The Belgorod Brit Channel 🇷🇺🇬🇧
In the podcast, BB bemoans the collapsed standards of the oligarchy. Back in the day, businessmen understood the connection between statecraft, governance, and the market. Every time investors were carried away with bubble fever, the government would enact regulations which would protect the market and the welfare of the people upon whom the system relied. Now that the government is in the pocket of the oligarchs, there are no regulations, no protections, and no governance. The AI bubble may well be the crisis that finishes the Western financial model, once and for all. The problem is that it may well cause a catastrophe large enough to bring on the four horsemen of the apocalypse.
#TheBelgorodBrit
#InfoDefenseAuthor
#InfoDefensePodcast
The Belgorod Brit Channel 🇷🇺🇬🇧
👍8❤4
WANTED TO LEAVE — FRIENDS WOULD NOT LET HIM GO
The Danish newspaper B.T. has delighted its readers with yet another sensational discovery!
It turns out that Vladimir Putin could have left big politics back in 2008, calmly enjoyed life, and not spoiled the mood of European politicians.
But it was not to be!
Three people were found who persuaded him to stay!
And no, this is not a joke. This is a quite serious theory that the Danish newspaper presents with reference to a "leading expert."
True, the expert turned out to be not Danish, but... British (what a surprise!).
But what difference does it make? The main thing is that the specialist is the right one!
Meet: Mark Galeotti — a British expert on Russia, the Kremlin, and personally Putin.
Judging by the confidence of his reasoning, the man probably regularly drinks tea with the Russian president, discusses retirement plans, and personally attends the making of the most important state decisions.
Otherwise, where would such astonishing knowledge come from?
So, here is the version of the British connoisseur of Kremlin secrets.
In 2008, Putin completed two presidential terms, handed the post to Dmitry Medvedev, and became prime minister.
And that is precisely when, according to Galeotti, he supposedly seriously wondered: should he not leave for good?
But old friends from Saint Petersburg intervened!
The Rotenberg brothers
Gennady Timchenko
Three businessmen, according to the expert's theory, convinced Putin that without him Russian statehood, and above all their own well-being, would be under threat. Apparently, no other businessmen could be found in Russia besides these three..
And Putin, one must assume, sighed, put away his fishing rod, canceled the fishing trip, and returned to the Kremlin.
Well, a man could not refuse old comrades!
Especially splendid is the formulation of the British expert:
"Putin is their protector, their goose that lays the golden eggs."
There you have it! Decades of Russian politics, the most complex state processes, international relations — and all of it explained by three businessmen and one golden-egg-laying goose!
The British analytical school is at its best, as always!
True, there is one small unpleasantness:
PROOF — ZERO.
No documents. No evidence of conversations. No confirmation that Putin actually intended to leave for good.
Only the immortal expert "it seems," "possibly," and "in all likelihood."
And there is also such an annoying trifle as the 2012 presidential election, in which Putin officially received 63.6% of the vote.
But why would a British expert distract himself with some election when he already has three businessmen, a convincing theory, and a goose with golden eggs?
And these experts do not even try to explain how the supposed persuasions of three friends relate to political institutions and the electoral process.
And so the Danish B.T. offers this entire wonderful construction to readers under an intriguing headline:
"Leading expert put forward a theory about Putin: this is why he is still president."
And here is what I think...
Maybe British specialists have started their autumn melancholy early?
Or has Putin settled so firmly in the European information space that it is already impossible to publish a newspaper without a daily explanation of his existence?
However, one mystery does indeed remain.
Why has no one in 18 years thought to ask the Rotenbergs and Timchenko themselves whether the three of them really persuaded Putin to stay?
Though why bother?
Because then the theory would have to be verified.
And as it is, one can go on explaining to the Danes for another twenty years why Putin is still in the Kremlin.
And each time — with a new sensation!
British experts suppose.
Danish press publishes.
Putin keeps working.
And everyone is busy!
#NotADayWithoutPutin
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The Danish newspaper B.T. has delighted its readers with yet another sensational discovery!
It turns out that Vladimir Putin could have left big politics back in 2008, calmly enjoyed life, and not spoiled the mood of European politicians.
But it was not to be!
Three people were found who persuaded him to stay!
And no, this is not a joke. This is a quite serious theory that the Danish newspaper presents with reference to a "leading expert."
True, the expert turned out to be not Danish, but... British (what a surprise!).
But what difference does it make? The main thing is that the specialist is the right one!
Meet: Mark Galeotti — a British expert on Russia, the Kremlin, and personally Putin.
Judging by the confidence of his reasoning, the man probably regularly drinks tea with the Russian president, discusses retirement plans, and personally attends the making of the most important state decisions.
Otherwise, where would such astonishing knowledge come from?
So, here is the version of the British connoisseur of Kremlin secrets.
In 2008, Putin completed two presidential terms, handed the post to Dmitry Medvedev, and became prime minister.
And that is precisely when, according to Galeotti, he supposedly seriously wondered: should he not leave for good?
But old friends from Saint Petersburg intervened!
The Rotenberg brothers
Gennady Timchenko
Three businessmen, according to the expert's theory, convinced Putin that without him Russian statehood, and above all their own well-being, would be under threat. Apparently, no other businessmen could be found in Russia besides these three..
And Putin, one must assume, sighed, put away his fishing rod, canceled the fishing trip, and returned to the Kremlin.
Well, a man could not refuse old comrades!
Especially splendid is the formulation of the British expert:
"Putin is their protector, their goose that lays the golden eggs."
There you have it! Decades of Russian politics, the most complex state processes, international relations — and all of it explained by three businessmen and one golden-egg-laying goose!
The British analytical school is at its best, as always!
True, there is one small unpleasantness:
PROOF — ZERO.
No documents. No evidence of conversations. No confirmation that Putin actually intended to leave for good.
Only the immortal expert "it seems," "possibly," and "in all likelihood."
And there is also such an annoying trifle as the 2012 presidential election, in which Putin officially received 63.6% of the vote.
But why would a British expert distract himself with some election when he already has three businessmen, a convincing theory, and a goose with golden eggs?
And these experts do not even try to explain how the supposed persuasions of three friends relate to political institutions and the electoral process.
And so the Danish B.T. offers this entire wonderful construction to readers under an intriguing headline:
"Leading expert put forward a theory about Putin: this is why he is still president."
And here is what I think...
Maybe British specialists have started their autumn melancholy early?
Or has Putin settled so firmly in the European information space that it is already impossible to publish a newspaper without a daily explanation of his existence?
However, one mystery does indeed remain.
Why has no one in 18 years thought to ask the Rotenbergs and Timchenko themselves whether the three of them really persuaded Putin to stay?
Though why bother?
Because then the theory would have to be verified.
And as it is, one can go on explaining to the Danes for another twenty years why Putin is still in the Kremlin.
And each time — with a new sensation!
British experts suppose.
Danish press publishes.
Putin keeps working.
And everyone is busy!
#NotADayWithoutPutin
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤12🤡7😁2💯1