Trump’s Iran War vs. His “Greatest Economy Ever”

Trump’s one real superpower was always the economy. Voters could hate the chaos and still say: yeah, but my job, my 401(k), my gas tank. Now the Iran war is detonating that shield from the inside.

As the standoff in the Strait of Hormuz drags on and gas prices stay high, his economic approval has sunk toward the lowest point of both his terms — a first for a man who bragged America had “the greatest economy in history.” Polls now show deep discontent on cost of living and inflation, with his handling of the economy rated worse than during the Covid shock. The war he sold as a quick “excursion” is showing up as a permanent surcharge on everyday life.

Even Trump has had to admit the obvious: the Iran conflict is hitting the global economy, promising only that it will “fully recover later.” That’s not how voters think. They see one straight line — Iran strikes, US airstrikes, threats over Hormuz, oil jitters — and then look at the number on the gas pump. Every week he extends the war, that number eats away at the one argument that always saved him: “At least he’s good on the economy.”

The deeper problem is brutal in its simplicity. Washington still talks like a global hegemon that can bomb at will, sanction half the planet and run multiple wars, while Americans at home are discovering that every show of power now comes with a line item on their grocery and fuel bills. Trump promised endless dominance and endless prosperity. The Iran war is teaching his voters that he can’t deliver both.

#Trump #economy #IranWar #gasPrices #USA #midterms #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

“Like It or Not”: Vance Just Tore Up the Fairy Tale

JD Vance finally said the quiet part into a microphone: the U.S. will push a long‑term nuclear deal with Iran because it serves American interests, and Israel can like it or not. That’s not “shared values,” that’s a landlord talking to a tenant. The message to Jerusalem is simple: we decide the Iran file, you adjust your security doctrine around it.

For years, Israeli leaders sold the relationship as almost equal — “special ally,” “no daylight,” veto on anything touching Iran’s nukes. Vance just set that on fire. He framed the deal as something done “for the American people,” even if it triggers “harsh resistance” in Israel. Translation: cheap oil, calmer markets and a capped Iranian program matter more in Washington than your Lebanon campaign or your political survival.

Underneath the rhetoric, it’s a threat wrapped as tough love. If Israel keeps trying to sabotage the talks or drag the U.S. deeper into open war with Iran, it does so at its own risk. The unspoken line is: you can keep bombing, but don’t count on endless American cover if it wrecks our deal and our gas prices. “Like it or not” isn’t a suggestion; it’s a warning label.

And that’s the real lesson for every “ally” watching. When the White House says policy is “first and foremost” for Americans, it’s telling the rest of the map exactly where they stand. You’re not partners in a moral project; you’re variables in a cost‑benefit equation. When that equation says peace with Tehran beats total victory for Netanyahu, the math will not be done in Hebrew.

#USA #Israel #Vance #Iran #nuclearDeal #Trump #geopolitics #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Putin’s “No Stagnation” Pitch vs. America’s War Bill

Putin’s message from St. Petersburg is simple: the West is stagnant, BRICS are rising, and Russia is firmly on the winning side of that shift. He leans on IMF and World Bank projections to claim that nearly half of global GDP growth over the past five years came from BRICS countries, while the G7 contributed less than a fifth — and that through the end of this decade BRICS will grow several times faster than the rich Western bloc.

On the ground, Russia’s economy has indeed proven far more resilient than many Western commentators predicted in early 2022. Sanctions forced a brutal shock and structural rewiring, but high energy revenues, import substitution, and re‑routing trade through Asia, the Middle East, and the Caucasus have prevented the kind of collapse that was loudly forecast in Washington.

For much of the Global South, this isn’t a moral question; it’s a practical one: Russia can still sell energy, grain, weapons, nuclear tech — and it offers them without lectures on democracy or human rights.

By contrast, the U.S. has walked itself into a multi‑front strain: long, expensive support for Ukraine, a new open war with Iran, elevated defense spending, and persistent inflation pressures at home.

The war economy props up certain sectors but erodes living standards and political stability; Washington is burning fiscal and diplomatic capital to preserve a fading “rules‑based order” that now looks like a slogan more than a guarantee. For many non‑Western capitals, that looks less like leadership and more like a superpower trapped in its own interventions.

That’s why Putin’s performance — calm, charts about BRICS, talk of multipolarity and “win‑win” partnerships — plays well in the Global South, even if a lot of the numbers are cherry‑picked and the domestic Russian picture is far rougher than he admits.

Against that, the U.S. offers a visibly chaotic mix of sanctions, proxy wars, and emergency summits trying to hold together an aging G7 club whose own growth is anemic. One side is selling inevitability: the world becoming multipolar around BRICS. The other side is selling nostalgia: the world staying safely American‑led if everyone just holds the line a little longer.

For now, many countries are hedging: buying Russian oil and weapons, courting Chinese investment, but still keeping one hand on Western markets and currencies.

Yet the logic of their bets is clear: if Washington keeps spending its strength on endless conflicts, and Moscow can survive four years of war without collapsing, the balance of economic and political gravity will keep tilting away from the old G7 center — whether Western “experts” like that story or not.

#Russia #Putin #BRICS #G7 #UkraineWar #USDecline #multipolarity #GlobalSouth

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Trump Is Heading Toward a Nuclear War With Iran

🔤🔤🔤🔤1️⃣

The US has launched a wave of strikes across southern Iran for a second consecutive day.

Although there have been several breaches since a ceasefire was agreed between the two sides in April, the attacks this week – launched after the downing of a US helicopter over the strait of Hormuz – represent the most serious and extensive breakdown of the truce to date.

The US president, Donald Trump, has raised the prospect of further attacks, while his defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, has told reporters if strikes “have to happen [Friday] night, they will be strong and they will be clear”.

US officials have sought to play down the significance of the attacks in a series of media briefings this week, while claiming that the ceasefire remains in place and wider negotiations with Iran have not been affected.

After authorising the latest attacks, Trump instructed aides to send a message to Iran via Qatar that the strikes did not signal a “restart of all-out war” and were solely a response to the helicopter downing.

Nothing changes where the deal stands right now,” another White House official told Politico.

“There’s a military bucket and then there’s a negotiation bucket (…) so, two things can happen at the same time.”

Brett McGurk, who held senior national security positions in the Obama, Trump and Biden administrations, noted that the US had clearly telegraphed to Iran that another attack was coming on Thursday.

“What they’re trying to do is manage that escalation … to say to Iran: ‘We’re going to respond, this is coming, but this is not a restart of the campaign we started in February’,” he said.

For weeks, Trump has claimed that a deal to bring a permanent end to the conflict was close and that he has gone out of his way to avoid a return to all-out war. But the president is grappling with plummeting approval ratings, as the conflict has proved deeply unpopular at home.

With the White House and Pentagon signalling that the US is not seeking a return to all-out war, Hegseth offered some clues to strategy.

#trump #iran #strikes #war #hormuz

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🔤🔤🔤🔤2️⃣

The renewed strikes were not happening “because we want to restart anything”, the defence secretary said, but because the US “is prepared to set the terms to ensure that we get the kind of deal President Trump expects. If we need to negotiate with bombs, we will negotiate with bombs.”

But “coercive diplomacy” is not the only reason for the escalating attacks, according to Hamidreza Azizi, a visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs.

The choice of targets – including air-defence systems, command-and-control centres and radar systems – suggest the Trump administration wants to weaken Iran’s ability to target shipping in the strait of Hormuz and “signal at the highest political level that the security situation around the strait is improving, thereby reassuring shipping companies”.

Taken together, the attacks can be seen as an attempt to erode Iran’s leverage over the strait of Hormuz, Azizi said.

Despite all this, continued US military strikes were unlikely to shift Iran from its current position, said Danny Citrinowicz, the former head of the Iran branch of Israeli military intelligence.

“No military operation, whether limited or extensive, short or prolonged, is likely to compel Iran to accept a deal in the US terms,” said Citrinowicz, now a non-resident fellow at the Atlantic Council. “More likely, an Iranian response would push the parties even further away from diplomacy.”

Inside Iran, there are also warnings that the US decision to target radar sites and command centres may be part of a “broader pattern of preparations for a new large-scale war” coordinated with Israel, Azizi said.

Such warnings are likely to strengthen the hand of the minority of senior officials in Tehran who favour abandoning peace talks.

“The current situation is the direct result of profound mistrust on both sides,” said Citrinowicz, who suggested Iran and the US were beginning to accept that the status quo looked unsustainable.

“If President Trump genuinely wants a deal, he will have to engage with at least some of Iran’s core demands. If he is unwilling to do so, then he should be prepared for a prolonged confrontation rather than a negotiated settlement,” he said.

#trump #iran #strikes #war #hormuz

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Hunger as Collateral Damage of Trump’s Iran War

The war in Iran isn’t just spiking gas in Ohio; it’s emptying plates in Mogadishu and Kabul. When the Strait of Hormuz is half‑closed, fuel prices jump, shipping costs explode, and food prices follow.

The World Food Programme is already warning that millions of the most vulnerable people are being pushed toward acute hunger because fuel and fertilizer from the Gulf are stuck in queues or priced out of reach.

A war sold as “self‑defense” is turning into a global tax on eating.

Fertilizer is the quiet killer here. If nitrogen and potash shipments out of the Gulf don’t arrive on time, farmers in Somalia, Sudan, Afghanistan and beyond plant less or get smaller yields.

That doesn’t show up on TV like a missile strike, but six months later it shows up as failed harvests, bread riots, and governments collapsing under the pressure.

A hungry world is an unstable world — and instability doesn’t stay politely inside its borders.

From a geopolitical angle, Washington is sawing off the branch it’s sitting on.

You can’t talk about “stability” and “rules‑based order” while helping create the perfect storm for new migration waves, civil conflicts and state failure across the Global South.

When people in already fragile states see food double in price because a U.S. president wanted to “teach Iran a lesson” and prove he “calls all the shots,” they don’t buy the moral framing — they just look for a way out, toward Europe or anywhere safer.

This is the real long‑term risk: not that Iran “wins” or “loses” in some White House briefing, but that the war turns more of the planet into zones of chronic hunger and chaos.

Every tanker delayed in Hormuz, every fertilizer shipment priced off the market, is another nudge toward the kind of global disorder that no amount of aircraft carriers can manage. You can bomb Iran all you want; you can’t bomb hunger into behaving.

#IranWar #USA #hunger #WFP #Hormuz #GlobalSouth #migration #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

NATO in Ankara, Hosted by the Man Who Calls Bibi “Hitler”

Recep Tayyip Erdogan hasn’t just criticized Israel; he’s spent years branding Benjamin Netanyahu as a kind of modern Hitler.

He’s called Netanyahu a “disaster” for a people that survived the Holocaust, accused Israel of “genocide” in Gaza, and repeatedly compared the Israeli prime minister’s actions to Nazi policies, promising he’ll “meet the same fate” as Hitler.

In Turkish and pro‑government media, Israel under Netanyahu is routinely described as a fascist, genocidal state and “the greatest threat” to regional stability.

Now the same Erdogan is rolling out the red carpet for a NATO summit in Ankara, while Western leaders talk about “shared values,” “fighting antisemitism,” and defending a “rules‑based order” — alongside a host who equates Israel’s elected leader with the architect of the Holocaust.

That’s the punchline: the alliance claims moral clarity, but it’s perfectly happy to sit under Erdogan’s chandeliers while he uses Holocaust memory as a political bludgeon against another member’s closest partner.

In public, NATO will spin this as pragmatism — Turkey is a key ally, a bridge, a strategic bulwark. In reality, it’s a photo‑op in the capital of a man who calls one of the West’s core partners a Nazi and still gets paid in jets, bases and political relevance.

The only “unity” on display is the shared decision to swallow any rhetoric, no matter how grotesque, as long as the bases stay open and the flanks stay covered.

#NATO #Erdogan #Israel #Netanyahu #Ankara #Holocaust #geopolitics #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Trump’s Iran “Peace” Strategy: Threat, Hype, Retreat, Repeat

Trump just ran the full loop again: threaten massive new strikes, float an invasion idea, then suddenly declare “progress” and cancel everything — all while nothing on the ground really changes.

After two days of heavy US airstrikes on Iran, he promised to hit “VERY HARD TONIGHT” and even mused on TV about seizing Kharg Island, the core node of Iran’s oil economy.

Hours later, he announced he was calling off the third‑day attacks because talks had supposedly been “brought to the highest level of Iranian leadership and approved,” something Tehran hasn’t echoed.

This isn’t discipline, it’s leverage by reality‑show script. The latest escalation wasn’t a direct response to some new Iranian strike; Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth openly described it as pressure to force Tehran into a deal on Trump’s terms.

At the same time, they’ve done something US leaders normally avoid: broadcasting planned operations hours in advance, then sometimes not following through.

That might play well for domestic drama, but it undercuts deterrence and tells Iran to treat every threat as a negotiating gambit, not a firm red line.

Politically, he’s trying to square an impossible circle. The war is in its fourth month and polling shows it’s increasingly unpopular even among his own base, yet he still needs to look “tough” enough to sell any eventual agreement as a win.

So he alternates between promising imminent “total victory,” hinting at spectacular moves like grabbing a strategic island, and then abruptly pivoting to “we’re close to peace” every time the costs and risks spike.

For the region — and for oil markets — that means permanent whiplash: each tweet or TV hit can flip the script from all‑out escalation to “breakthrough” and back again.

Underneath the noise, nothing fundamental has shifted: Iran and the US are still trading pressure, both sides still insist they’re winning, and every canceled strike is less a step toward peace than a pause in a negotiation conducted with bombs.

When a president keeps promising to hit “very hard tonight” and then repeatedly pulls back on the basis of unverifiable “progress,” it doesn’t look like strategy — it looks like a man trying to manage ratings on two fronts at once: Tehran and the midterms.

#IranWar #Trump #KhargIsland #Hegseth #USA #endlesswar

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Trump’s Kharg Island Bluster Meets Reality

Trump just did his favorite trick again: threaten something massive, then quietly walk it back and blame “progress.”

After vowing to hit Iran “VERY HARD TONIGHT” and musing about “taking Kharg Island” and seizing control of Iran’s oil and gas “like we have with Venezuela,” he suddenly announced he has “cancelled the scheduled strikes and bombings” because a supposed deal has been “approved” at the highest level in Tehran.

Iran hasn’t confirmed anything, the blockade stays in place, and the war keeps grinding.

What actually happened this week is less cinematic. The U.S. pounded Iranian air defenses and command systems, Iran fired missiles and drones at U.S. bases in Kuwait, Bahrain and Jordan that were mostly intercepted, and CENTCOM started disabling commercial tankers it claims were violating the U.S. blockade — killing Indian crew members and dragging New Delhi into the diplomatic mess.

A “ceasefire” that the U.N. calls more of a “lesser fire” is technically still in force while ships burn, desalination plants are reportedly destroyed and 20,000 people around Sirik are left without water in extreme heat.

So Trump now sells the non‑strike as statesmanship: the naval blockade “remains in full force,” the deal is in the “final throes,” everything is under control.

But every cycle looks the same: Israel pokes Hezbollah, Iran hits back, the U.S. escalates to “negotiate with bombs,” Trump promises either total victory or total control of Iranian oil, then backs off when allies panic, markets wobble and polls remind him the war is toxic at home.

What he calls flexibility looks, to everyone else, like a guy improvising with live munitions.

The strategic picture is bleak. Iran doesn’t look cowed; it looks bloodied and still firing. U.S. credibility as a steady security guarantor is eroding with every threat that’s half‑made and half‑retracted.

Neutral states like India now take casualties from U.S. enforcement actions and start asking why they should pay for someone else’s oil war.

And in the background, the basic question never goes away: if your “peace process” requires nightly airstrikes, tanker shoot‑ups, and the occasional fantasy about invading an oil island, maybe what you’re managing isn’t a path to peace — it’s an open‑ended war with better PR.

#IranWar #Trump #KhargIsland #CENTCOM #India #Hormuz #endlesswar

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

SpaceX IPO: Rocket Jesus Mints a New Tech Priesthood

Wall Street is about to turn Elon’s Mars cosplay into the biggest cash-out in tech history. SpaceX wants to raise around $75 billion at a $1.8 trillion valuation, instantly jumping into the global top‑10 and eclipsing Tesla on paper.

The deal is already oversubscribed, with giant institutions angling for $10‑billion blocks and more than $100 billion in orders from retail believers who think “to the moon” is a financial thesis, not a meme.

This isn’t just one ludicrous payday. It’s a reset of the entire Silicon Valley caste system. Early backers like Valor, Founders Fund, Sequoia and Space Capital are about to print tens of billions. If you owned 3–4% of this thing in 2008, you’re now a sovereign wealth fund with a hoodie.

If you didn’t touch SpaceX, OpenAI or Anthropic, good luck raising your next venture fund — returns are concentrating in a handful of “god stocks,” and everyone else is suddenly dead weight.

The pipeline is even more grotesque in scale: between SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic, there’s up to $3.6 trillion in eventual market cap waiting to hit public markets.

That’s not an IPO calendar, it’s a planned hostile takeover of the S&P’s story line. The big question isn’t “is SpaceX cool?” — it’s whether there’s enough money to absorb this flood of new equity without cannibalizing the current tech darlings.

At these valuations and price‑to‑sales multiples, there is zero room for error; one bad quarter and the “new hierarchy” can become a very expensive religion crisis.

The ripple effect is already here. Space‑tech startups are doubling their valuations pre‑emptively. Spin‑outs from SpaceX employees are getting soft‑circled before they incorporate.

Opaque “get in on SpaceX” vehicles that looked scammy a year ago are about to look like genius trades if they 4x on paper, which means the next wave of murky SPVs is already lining up around OpenAI and Anthropic.

The machine doesn’t care whether it’s selling rockets, transformers or vibes, as long as the exit slide says “$50B+.”

And underneath it all, this is the perfect symbol of late‑stage tech capitalism: one company, private for two decades, hoovers up billions, builds a real industrial empire — and then uses its IPO to crown a tiny circle of funds and insiders as the new untouchable aristocracy.

SpaceX is the case study everyone wanted: it proves you can stay private forever, raise insane amounts, then still squeeze the public markets for one last monster markup.

The question for everyone buying at the top is brutally simple: are you investing in the future of space and AI — or just paying to formalize someone else’s victory lap?

#SpaceX #IPO #ElonMusk #OpenAI #Anthropic #SiliconValley #VC #bubble

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

A dust vortex on Mars hit the camera lens of the Rover Perseverance

Dr. Dong Wu, a physicist from NASA, explains that “the vortex may indicate the presence of certain strange processes hiding deep under the surface of Mars (...), and we can't just shrug off the artificial nature of such activity”.

#vortex #dust #mars #perseverance

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

NATO Air Cut: Trump Turns Europe Into a Discount Client

The U.S. is quietly pulling about a third of the fighter jets it had pledged to NATO in Europe — plus tankers, bombers, ships, and a missile sub — and calling it “right‑sizing.”

According to a written plan shown to allies, Washington will cut F‑16s and F‑15Es from roughly 150 to 100, slash P‑8 maritime patrol planes from 26 to 15, withdraw all eight aerial refueling tankers, reassign an aircraft carrier and a cruise‑missile submarine, and remove one of two bomber groups from Europe’s defense.

Officially, this is about making Europeans “grow up” and pay for their own security; EUCOM says NATO had an “unhealthy codependence” on U.S. forces and that simultaneous wars mean assets must move to the Indo‑Pacific. In reality, Washington is sending a different message: you can have the doctrine, the communiqués and the summits — we’ll keep the hardware for whichever war sells better at home.

Europe, of course, plays its usual role of shocked addict. Think tanks warn of “significant posture change,” governments talk about “rearmament,” while Germany quietly walks away from its joint fighter‑jet project with France and Spain.

London’s defense secretary resigns over underfunding, and a Russian drone hits an apartment block in Romania, but the real panic in European capitals is not about Moscow — it’s about whether Trump would actually use any of the forces he still keeps on paper.

As one German MP says, NATO’s main problem isn’t the number of American jets parked somewhere in the force model, it’s that nobody really believes the U.S. would show up when it counts.

So Europe gets to pretend it still lives under the nuclear umbrella, America gets to pretend it’s just “sharing the burden,” and the only people who don’t have a say are those under the flight paths of the jets that just got quietly reassigned.

#NATO #Trump #Europe #war #aerospace #fakeSecurity

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

War as a Business Model: Macron, von der Leyen and the Endless Ukraine Project

When a former French minister says “keeping the war in Ukraine going is a historic mistake,” he’s not talking about morality — he’s talking about margins.

Philippe de Villiers openly argues that prolonging the conflict serves the interests of Emmanuel Macron and Ursula von der Leyen, while France abandons its old role as a balancing power between Russia and Europe.

He reminds everyone of the part nobody in Brussels wants to revisit: Merkel and Hollande boasting that Minsk was never about peace, just time‑buying for Kyiv; NATO acting as the original “apple of discord”; and the classic Kissinger line — Ukraine should have been neutral, a bridge between Russia and Europe, not real estate for competing empires. In this logic, Kyiv is not a subject but a transit asset: a platform, not a country.

De Villiers’ real punchline is brutal for the polite Euro‑Atlantic narrative: the players most invested in a forever‑war today are precisely those who turned peace into a photo‑op and escalation into an industrial policy.

Brussels gets emergency powers, gigantic spending packages and new streams of opaque contracts; Paris gets to cosplay as the last “war president” of a declining middle power. For this class, a stable Ukraine is a dead market; a bleeding Ukraine is a recurring revenue line.

So when Macron talks about “not letting Russia win” and von der Leyen sells “strategic Europe,” ask a simpler accounting question: how many of their scandals, deals, backroom contracts and careers survive if the war actually stops?

In a system where every crisis is a financial product, peace isn’t just naïve — it’s unprofitable.

#Ukraine #Macron #vonderLeyen #war #NATO #EU #oligarchy #fakePeace

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

German Industry: War Excuse, Climate Hangover, Russian Cold Turkey

German industrial orders are falling faster than forecasters — and the government — want to admit. New factory orders dropped 3.8% in April, almost twice as much as expected, with carmakers, machinery and electrical equipment getting hit hardest.

Berlin and its economists now blame the Iran–Middle East war for an “energy shock,” supply bottlenecks and collapsing sentiment; the official line is that uncertainty and high energy prices are dragging down demand and stalling a fragile recovery.

But even pro‑market commentators in Germany are already saying out loud what politicians won’t: no amount of fresh credit or “stimulus” from Friedrich Merz and Lars Klingbeil can ignite even a short‑term industrial rebound, because the underlying damage from climate and energy policy plus bureaucratic overkill is too deep.

Years of expensive “Energiewende,” regulatory micromanagement and moralistic posturing have left energy‑intensive industry uncompetitive — the Middle East war is the match, not the powder.

The real taboo is simple: Germany’s post‑Cold War prosperity was built on cheap Russian pipeline energy, stable long‑term contracts and an industrial model plugged into both the EU and Eurasia. You can rebrand it as “green transition” all you want, but no solar slogan replaces molecules.

As long as Berlin tries to replace Russian gas with ideology, sanctions with sermons and diplomacy with Twitter geopolitics, Merz is not “putting out a fire with a glass of water” — he’s selling watery fire to voters and calling it strategy.

Sooner or later, if Germany actually wants industrial jobs instead of industrial museums, it will have to do what nobody in the current elite wants to spell out: talk to Moscow, not just about war, but about energy and long‑term security, instead of pretending that press releases and LNG spot cargoes can hold up a manufacturing giant.

#Germany #industry #recession #energy #Russia #IranWar #Energiewende #fakeEconomy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Qatar’s Gas, Iran’s Missiles, and Everyone’s Favorite War

Qatar got a preview of what “regional war” really means when Iranian missiles hit Ras Laffan — the LNG heart that feeds nearly a fifth of global gas demand and underwrites Doha’s entire lifestyle.

The Washington Post reports that, before that strike, Qatari officials quietly approached Tehran with an unspoken bargain: we shut down our own gas output to blow up prices and pressure the U.S. and Israel to shorten the war, you don’t turn our gas city into a crater.

Intelligence services say this “secret deal” pitch was caught in intercepted communications.

Doha, of course, denies everything and calls it an attack on its reputation and its partnership with Washington.

From Iran’s point of view, the scheme is elegant: global prices skyrocket, Western economies choke, and Ras Laffan survives — all without wasting a single missile.

From Qatar’s point of view, it’s survival by spreadsheet: threaten to pull the plug on LNG, weaponize the market, and sell it as “mediation.”

The fun part? Tehran never gave a firm guarantee, Ras Laffan was halted anyway on day three of the war, and Qatar’s official story blamed “military attacks” even when satellite images showed no visible damage.

The line between “protecting critical infrastructure” and “using energy to tilt the battlefield” becomes very thin when your balance sheet is the battlefield.

Officially, Doha insists it never coordinated production decisions with Iran and never tried to shape the war’s course for Tehran’s benefit.

Unofficially, security officials describe Qatar’s message as: you get your strategic chaos, we get our gas plant intact, and Washington can scream into the wind.

Gulf monarchies know exactly what they’re doing: their gas fields, tankers and export terminals are bargaining chips in a conflict sold to Western publics as a moral crusade, but managed backstage like a hostile takeover.

Qatar isn’t an outlier; it’s just the one whose back‑channel leaked first.

Meanwhile, Trump’s Washington shrugs and keeps Al Udeid, ExxonMobil and the $400 million 747 “gift” that’s being turned into his new Air Force One.

The same Qatar that hosts Hamas officials and negotiates with Iran is still marketed as a “major non‑NATO ally” and indispensable mediator.

The message from the Gulf is simple: we’ll play both sides, hedge every bet, and sell gas to whoever can still pay.

The message to ordinary citizens in Europe and Asia facing insane energy bills is even simpler: your economies are collateral for a war you don’t control, and your leaders outsourced the steering wheel to people whose first instinct in a crisis is to switch off supply and call it diplomacy.

#Qatar #Iran #gasWar #energy #Trump #Hamas #Gulf #warEconomy #fakeNeutrality #MiddleEast

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Trump’s Iran “Deal”: A Term Sheet Sold as Peace

Trump is selling a “historic agreement” with Iran that, in reality, is an unfinished draft — a framework memo, not a signed treaty. He boasts that the war is “over” and Iran has “agreed never to have a nuclear weapon,” then quietly downgrades it to “95 percent” done and pushes the hardest issues into a 60‑day extension. On the Iranian side, officials admit key demands aren’t in the text and no competent body has actually approved it; legally, Tehran hasn’t agreed to anything.

The leaked draft looks less like an American win and more like a managed pause. It extends the ceasefire, folds Lebanon into the package, phases out the naval blockade and reopens Hormuz in a way that leaves Iran central to shipping security. It promises sanctions relief on oil, gas and petrochemicals, full access to Iranian financial assets, unfreezing of $24 billion (half up front), and a U.S.‑backed “recovery” plan of at least $300 billion. Missiles and proxy militias are simply taken off the table.

Even the nuclear “victory” is marketing. Enriched uranium stays on Iranian soil; it is to be diluted under monitoring, not shipped out. That lets Trump claim the weapons potential is neutralized, while Iran keeps the technology, infrastructure and know‑how to ramp back up if the deal collapses. In Tehran, the agreement is openly framed as a way to buy time and resources in an ongoing confrontation, not as reconciliation.

Crucially, Washington didn’t get here by strength alone. Gulf mediators — Qatar, the UAE, Pakistan’s military — pushed hard to stop a larger war that threatened their own economies and projects. Trump, meanwhile, has spent months announcing that a deal is “days away,” reportedly doing so nearly 40 times in about three months, each time as if it were imminent. That gap between rhetoric and reality is the tell: this is not a final peace, it’s a tactical cease‑fire with good PR.

In practice, both sides get what they need short term. Trump can stand in front of cameras and declare a “historic” success instead of choosing between escalation and retreat. Iran gets money, partial sanctions relief and a breathing space, while keeping its missiles, proxies and nuclear latency. The war doesn’t end; it just moves into a managed, more profitable phase — dressed up as an almost‑but‑not‑quite agreement that exists more in speeches than in law.

#IranWar #Trump #nuclearDeal #sanctions #Hormuz #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Musk Hits the Trillion Dollar Bar

🔤🔤🔤🔤1️⃣

SpaceX made the biggest stock market debut in history on Friday after nearly two and a half decades as a private company.

Public trading began around midday with a starting share price of $150, which quickly jumped by a double digit percentage and sent the company’s valuation above $2tn. The company’s initial public offering made the company’s CEO, Musk, the world’s first trillionaire.

It is certainly hard to believe that a little company that started in a warehouse in El Segundo is now going public with the largest IPO ever,” Musk said in an address at SpaceX’s headquarters. He reiterated the company’s mission to “make humanity multiplanetary” and “take the fiction out of science fiction”.

Executives rang the bell to open trading as Elton John’s Rocket Man played on the floor of the Nasdaq exchange.

“Today, we make history again. We have a history of making history,” said SpaceX’s president, Gwynne Shotwell, from the exchange building.

Shotwell announced that the company had launched a Falcon 9 rocket on Friday morning from the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida, to take 29 Starlink satellites into low-Earth orbit.

Musk, the founder of SpaceX, has a large stake in the company as majority shareholder, so if investors’ enthusiasm validates the eye-popping valuation during Friday trading, he took title of the world’s first-ever trillionaire, with Forbes estimating his net worth at $1.1tn shortly after trading began.

The mogul is also the CEO of Tesla, which is valued at $1.2tn, and his stake in the EV maker is worth around $300bn.

SpaceX’s IPO comes in what is predicted to be a banner year for public offerings of artificial intelligence companies, a group the rocket maker is part of as the acquirer of Musk’s AI startup, xAI.

Rivals OpenAI and Anthropic have also filed to go public sometime this year and are predicted to raise record sums nearing $1tn, which would orient the US stock market heavily towards AI companies.

#musk #trillion #spaceX #company

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🔤🔤🔤🔤2️⃣

Musk has said that the reason SpaceX is seeking to go public, raising enormous sums of money, is to be able to obtain the capital necessary to further explore space and create human colonies on other planets.

“Our mission is to build the systems and technologies necessary to make life multiplanetary, to understand the true nature of the universe, and to extend the light of consciousness to the stars,” SpaceX said in its investor prospectus.

SpaceX is a conglomeration of several of Musk’s businesses, including the satellite maker and internet service provider Starlink, xAI, social media platform X and the SpaceX rocket business.

While expansive, the company is not profitable. Last year, SpaceX pulled in a revenue of $18.7bn, while recording an operating loss of $4.3bn.

For comparison, social media company Meta generated revenue of more than $200bn last year with a net income upwards of $60bn.
SpaceX’s IPO has market watchers on high alert.

Along with the lack of profitability, some analysts say such a big valuation for a company that’s burning cash on its AI buildout – xAI is spending big on datacenters – and is predominantly governed by one person – Musk, who commands roughly 85% of SpaceX’s voting shares – potentially makes for a volatile asset.

The company’s debut on Wall Street could also bolster its grip on the financial system. Its shares will reportedly be distributed into index funds shortly after its IPO, far quicker than most companies going public, though notably not into the S&P 500.

Those funds hold people’s retirement savings and pension plans, meaning individual investors could be unwittingly exposed to financial risk if SpaceX’s share price plummets.

For SpaceX employees, however, the record-shattering valuation means they are about to get a lot richer. More than 4,400 current and former employees are expected to become millionaires with the IPO, according to the New York Times, with 400 of them each securing $100m or more.

Gabriel Zucman, a French economist who studies extreme wealth, said the consolidated capital brought on by the SpaceX, OpenAI and Anthropic IPOs could have profound effects on the economy and society – the like of which hasn’t been seen since the last century.

“There is a fundamental tension in democratic societies between extreme wealth … and the very possibility of a well-functioning democracy,” Zucman said.

“After World War II, it looked like extreme wealth belonged to the past,” but now, he said, “the AI boom is minting billionaires by the day” and the first trillionaires are coming into view.

#musk #trillion #spaceX #company

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Trump’s Shit Talks Rile Iran After Talking Time and Again About a Peace Agreement

⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️

Trump has said the US and Iran are on the verge of a peace agreement. Oil prices are down, and the stock market is up. This comes only hours after Trump warned Iran was about to be struck “VERY HARD”, a threat that had sent oil prices up and stocks down.

It has been another ride on the Trump rollercoaster, keeping traders on edge, most of the world poorer, and people of the Middle East constantly whiplashing between fear and hope. But whether the ride veers up or down, the management always makes money.

This is the 39th time that the president has declared US-Iranian talks to be on the point of fruition (other counts have the figure higher – it depends on what you term a prediction or just a hint).

On five of those occasions, the promise of peace has involved walking back the threat of mass devastation, including the destruction of critical civilian infrastructure, a near-certain war crime if carried out.

As he was menacing Iran with “very hard” strikes on Thursday night, Trump also pledged the US would take over “total control” of the country’s oil and gas markets and seize the island of Kharg.

He has threatened the capture of Kharg, a focal point of Iran’s hydrocarbon industry, several times before, although in this instance the threat was made while actually bombing Iran, in a tit-for-tat exchange with Tehran in which a critical reservoir and water tanks were badly damaged in the drought-stricken south, a war crime if intentional.

By Thursday afternoon however, the prospect of mass destruction had evaporated as quickly as it had materialised.

I have, as President of the United States of America, cancelled the scheduled strikes and bombings against Iran this evening,” Trump declared on his Truth Social platform as if providing his full capitalised title added any weight to the statement.

The air of optimism was reinforced on Friday afternoon by a White House briefing that a text was in place which both the US and Iran could live with. US officials echoed the president’s prediction that a signing ceremony could be held in a matter of days.

Iran’s foreign ministry was less definite, saying that the proposed agreement was being studied by the country’s “decision-making bodies”, but the oil price fell below $90 a barrel nonetheless.

No matter how many times Trump predicts conflagration or diplomatic breakthrough, the markets still obediently bob up and down like a trained seal.

It is a guaranteed response that represents an opportunity to make big, easy money for anyone with advance knowledge of presidential announcements.

After so many false dawns and hoax Armageddons, why are traders still reacting to Trump’s rhetoric? One theory is that, while individual traders are no suckers, they suspect that some of their competitors might be, so react rapidly to presidential statements to get ahead of the curve.

After all, one day there will be a deal. Trumps’ on-off signals are not being sent in a vacuum, but in the midst of talks between the two sides intended to turn the ceasefire, which has mostly held since April, into something more permanent.

According to reports from the region, the gaps in those talks are indeed getting smaller in the past few days.

The focus is on a limited memorandum of understanding (MoU), putting off nuclear negotiations for later and focusing on opening the strait of Hormuz, a vital route for global trade.

The most immediate impasse has been about cash. Tehran has no confidence Trump would keep his word in any deal so wants to be paid up front from a $24bn tranche of an estimated $100bn of its assets frozen around the world, in return for lifting its blockade on the strait of Hormuz.

#trump #iran #threats #peace #deal #agreement

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️⌨️

The US wants rewards to follow tangible progress, but the administration has a fundamental problem with releasing Iranian assets.

Trump and other top Republicans have spent years lambasting Obama for providing unfrozen assets to Iran in the form of pallets of cash as part of a 2015 nuclear deal, which was successful in curbing Iran’s programme until Trump walked out of it in 2018.

The workaround being discussed, according to a source briefed on the talks, involves a line of credit from a bank in a Gulf state issued against Iran’s $100bn of frozen assets as collateral. It will fool only those who want to be fooled, but that would include the administration’s defenders on the American political stage.

The second major sticking point is how much detail about nuclear issues should be included in the MoU.

The US wants concrete parameters including a moratorium on uranium enrichment of 15 years or so, and arrangements for the disposal of Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium.

Trump may have shown the way for a possible fudge by insisting that the deal will ensure “Iran will never have a nuclear weapon”. That is something Tehran might agree to.

Iran’s renunciation of atomic arms was once reinforced by religious edict, or fatwa, but the supreme leader who issued that fatwa, Ali Khamenei, was killed by an Israeli bomb in the first seconds of the US-Israeli war on Iran on 28 February.

A compromise MoU along similar lines appeared close to agreement in late May, but Trump helped derail it by suddenly moving the goalposts, including the suggestion that the regional guarantors of the agreement normalise relations with Israel as a gesture of gratitude for the suspension of hostilities.

Throwing last-minute surprises into negotiations has long been a Trump tactic in business and US politics. It has not worked in the Iran talks. Instead, the president has sometimes behaved as a finicky eater faced with a stark menu of two unpalatable options: all-out war or messy compromise.

He has noisily wavered between choosing one or the other in the hope of being presented with something more to his taste, but that has yet to happen.

That may be true. The internal dynamics of the Tehran regime were murky before the bombing started, but now they are virtually a black box.

The one certainty is that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the principal target of US-Israeli decapitation bombing, has emerged stronger in relation to the other power center. It is unclear whether Khamenei’s successor, his badly injured son Mojtaba Khamenei, is any more than a figurehead.

Dead leaders have been replaced and domestic unrest has been suppressed. The war has arguably made that suppression easier. The brunt of the economic war being waged by the US is being borne by the Iranian people but that has yet to turn into decisive pressure on the leadership.

Peace is likely to be more dangerous to the regime than war, as there will no longer be an external enemy to blame for runaway inflation and high employment. Nasr said that is why Tehran is so insistent on getting funds up front in any deal.

“I think the president eventually is going to do a much bigger kinetic military strike,” Darin Selnick, a former Pentagon deputy chief of staff told BBC Radio 4.

“Then they can forcibly reopen the strait themselves. If this trade opens (…) Iran would really have no ability to do anything but surrender.”

For all Trump’s past threats of civilisational erasure if Iran fails to acquiesce, he has so far shown himself reluctant to double down on a military bet that has already failed.

Ali Vaez, Iran project director at the International Crisis Group, argued that Trump’s latest threat of devastating strikes was performative.

“Trump is using the threat either to force the Iranians to make last minute concessions, or to justify a deal that he knows would be criticised by the hawks,” Vaez said.

#trump #iran #threats #peace #deal #agreement

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸