🔺 The late Wilferd Madelung, a distinguished German scholar and expert in Shi'a studies, offers a profound analysis of the state of early Islamic society following the martyrdom of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Madelung, known for his in-depth research and insightful perspectives, was a prominent figure in Islamic studies, particularly in understanding the complex dynamics of leadership and succession in early Islam. His works, including the famous 📚 The Succession to Muhammad, have been influential in shedding light on the intricate political and religious landscape of the time. Madelung's contributions continue to be a cornerstone for scholars and students of Islamic history.
#IslamicHistory #ShiiteStudies #WilferdMadelung #EarlyIslam #Scholarship
https://t.me/rahyafte_com/62442
🌐 @rahyafte_en
#IslamicHistory #ShiiteStudies #WilferdMadelung #EarlyIslam #Scholarship
https://t.me/rahyafte_com/62442
🌐 @rahyafte_en
Telegram
رهیافته-(تازه مسلمانان)
🔺زنده یاد ویلفرد مادلونگ شیعهشناس معروف آلمانی، تحلیل جالبی از وضعیت جامعه صدر اسلام پس از شهادت پیامبر(ص) دارد.
کانال و سایت رهیافتگان را دنبال کنید👇
🌐 @rahyafte_com
کانال و سایت رهیافتگان را دنبال کنید👇
🌐 @rahyafte_com
Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
📆 Daily Calendar 🌺 Today: Monday 🌞 13 Mordad 1404 (Solar Hijri) ☪️ 10 Safar 1447 (Lunar Hijri) ✝️ 4 August 2025 (Gregorian) 🕎 10 Av 5785 (Hebrew) 🌍 Islamic Historical Events 1⃣ Qur'an raised on spears by the Syrians in the Battle of Siffin, a deceit by…
⚔️ The Battle of Siffin: Battleground of Jewish Infiltration
📜 A Controversial Reading of Early Islamic History
🔗 Source: Introduction to Understanding the Lineage of Deviance (Hosseinpour & Rezaei, 2022)
🔗 Full article: https://jscenter.ir/judaism-and-islam/jewish-intrigue/17899
Key Events:
1️⃣ Muawiyah’s Provocation
- When Imam Ali (ع) prepared to fight Muawiyah, the latter rallied Syrians by framing Ali as a "disturber of peace" and positioning himself as the avenger of Uthman’s murder. Syrians unanimously pledged: "We will avenge Uthman’s blood!" [1]
2️⃣ Devastating Toll
- 70,000 killed (54k Syrians, 25k Iraqis, including 25 veterans of Badr).
- 90 clashes over 100 days at Siffin. [2]
3️⃣ The "Jewish Infiltrator" Role
- Ash'ath bin Qays (alleged crypto-Jewish agent) is presented as a key saboteur who manipulated events in Muawiyah’s favor.
- Claim: Removing his influence would reveal a "radically different narrative" of Siffin.
4️⃣ Prophetic Signs Ignored
- Imam Ali’s legitimacy was marked by companions like Ammar Yasir (ع) – whom Prophet Muhammad (ص) foretold would be "killed by the transgressors" [3].
- Yet Syrians remained loyal to Muawiyah, suggesting they followed "a separate prophet named Muawiyah."
Muawiyah’s Strategic Wins:
✅ Narrative Control: Cemented Ali as "Uthman’s killer" and himself as the avenger.
✅ Testing Loyalties: Confirmed Syrian obedience and Iraqi fickleness.
✅ Scapegoating: Shifted blame for massacres to Ali and arbitration failures to Amr ibn Al-As.
✅ Eliminating Threats: Suspicious deaths (e.g., Ubaidullah ibn Umar).
The Real Culprits?
Imam Ali (ع) identified two groups that broke his back [6]:
1. Hypocritical Eloquents (منافقین): Corrupt scholars like Ash'ath who masked evil with rhetoric.
2. Ignorant Devotees (مقدسمآبان جاهل): Naive ascetics like Abu Musa Al-Ash'ari who undermined justice through misplaced piety.
⚠️ Conclusion:
- The Umayyad "tree of damnation" survived due to these infiltrators.
- "Jews had minimal direct presence because the Umayyads safeguarded all Jewish interests."
📚 Sources:
[1] Ibn Kathir, Al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya
[2] Ibn al-Jawzi, Al-Muntazam
[3] Bihar al-Anwar
[6] Al-Khisal
#BattleOfSiffin #ImamAli #UmayyadConspiracy #IslamicHistory #JewishInfluence #EarlyIslam #ReligiousPolitics
✅ @rahyafte_en
📜 A Controversial Reading of Early Islamic History
🔗 Source: Introduction to Understanding the Lineage of Deviance (Hosseinpour & Rezaei, 2022)
🔗 Full article: https://jscenter.ir/judaism-and-islam/jewish-intrigue/17899
Key Events:
1️⃣ Muawiyah’s Provocation
- When Imam Ali (ع) prepared to fight Muawiyah, the latter rallied Syrians by framing Ali as a "disturber of peace" and positioning himself as the avenger of Uthman’s murder. Syrians unanimously pledged: "We will avenge Uthman’s blood!" [1]
2️⃣ Devastating Toll
- 70,000 killed (54k Syrians, 25k Iraqis, including 25 veterans of Badr).
- 90 clashes over 100 days at Siffin. [2]
3️⃣ The "Jewish Infiltrator" Role
- Ash'ath bin Qays (alleged crypto-Jewish agent) is presented as a key saboteur who manipulated events in Muawiyah’s favor.
- Claim: Removing his influence would reveal a "radically different narrative" of Siffin.
4️⃣ Prophetic Signs Ignored
- Imam Ali’s legitimacy was marked by companions like Ammar Yasir (ع) – whom Prophet Muhammad (ص) foretold would be "killed by the transgressors" [3].
- Yet Syrians remained loyal to Muawiyah, suggesting they followed "a separate prophet named Muawiyah."
Muawiyah’s Strategic Wins:
✅ Narrative Control: Cemented Ali as "Uthman’s killer" and himself as the avenger.
✅ Testing Loyalties: Confirmed Syrian obedience and Iraqi fickleness.
✅ Scapegoating: Shifted blame for massacres to Ali and arbitration failures to Amr ibn Al-As.
✅ Eliminating Threats: Suspicious deaths (e.g., Ubaidullah ibn Umar).
The Real Culprits?
Imam Ali (ع) identified two groups that broke his back [6]:
1. Hypocritical Eloquents (منافقین): Corrupt scholars like Ash'ath who masked evil with rhetoric.
2. Ignorant Devotees (مقدسمآبان جاهل): Naive ascetics like Abu Musa Al-Ash'ari who undermined justice through misplaced piety.
⚠️ Conclusion:
- The Umayyad "tree of damnation" survived due to these infiltrators.
- "Jews had minimal direct presence because the Umayyads safeguarded all Jewish interests."
📚 Sources:
[1] Ibn Kathir, Al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya
[2] Ibn al-Jawzi, Al-Muntazam
[3] Bihar al-Anwar
[6] Al-Khisal
#BattleOfSiffin #ImamAli #UmayyadConspiracy #IslamicHistory #JewishInfluence #EarlyIslam #ReligiousPolitics
✅ @rahyafte_en
Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
🔷 How to Understand History Intelligently Approaches to the Burning of the House of Fāṭimah To understand the hidden realities of early Islamic history, we must avoid two extremes: blind acceptance of every historical report and blind denial of every uncomfortable…
The first historical questions should be more precise:
Was there a confrontation at Fāṭimah's house?
Were there threats involving fire?
Was pressure applied to obtain allegiance?
Which early sources preserve these reports?
How independent are the traditions?
What details are historically secure, and which remain disputed?
How did later political and theological developments affect the transmission of these reports?
This is what understanding history means.
Not accepting everything.
Not denying everything.
But following the evidence wherever it leads.
And when the evidence concerns Fāṭimah al-Zahrāʾ (سلام الله عليها), the daughter of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, the subject deserves particular care, precision, and intellectual honesty.
The name of Fāṭimah remains one of the clearest moral dividing lines in the history of Islam.
History may be censored.
Sources may be selective.
Narratives may be rewritten.
But the task of the historian remains the same: search, compare, verify—and never surrender the truth to inherited slogans.
#History #IslamicHistory #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #EarlyIslam #HouseOfFatimah #HistoricalResearch #SourceCriticism #UmarIbnAlKhattab #UrwahIbnAlZubayr #MusaIbnUqbah #AlWaqidi #AhlulBaytHistory #UnderstandingHistory
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2722
🆔 @rahyafte_en
Was there a confrontation at Fāṭimah's house?
Were there threats involving fire?
Was pressure applied to obtain allegiance?
Which early sources preserve these reports?
How independent are the traditions?
What details are historically secure, and which remain disputed?
How did later political and theological developments affect the transmission of these reports?
This is what understanding history means.
Not accepting everything.
Not denying everything.
But following the evidence wherever it leads.
And when the evidence concerns Fāṭimah al-Zahrāʾ (سلام الله عليها), the daughter of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, the subject deserves particular care, precision, and intellectual honesty.
The name of Fāṭimah remains one of the clearest moral dividing lines in the history of Islam.
History may be censored.
Sources may be selective.
Narratives may be rewritten.
But the task of the historian remains the same: search, compare, verify—and never surrender the truth to inherited slogans.
#History #IslamicHistory #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #EarlyIslam #HouseOfFatimah #HistoricalResearch #SourceCriticism #UmarIbnAlKhattab #UrwahIbnAlZubayr #MusaIbnUqbah #AlWaqidi #AhlulBaytHistory #UnderstandingHistory
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2722
🆔 @rahyafte_en