🌿 A Remarkable Debate by Allama Amini
During the height of his fame, the renowned scholar Allama Abdul Husayn Amini was invited to a dinner gathering while visiting either Makkah or Madinah.
The hosts were known for theological disputes and intended to engage him in debate. Allama Amini accepted the invitation on one condition:
"I will attend only if there is no discussion or argument—just a dinner gathering."
They agreed, but among themselves they thought, "Let him come; we will find a way to challenge him."
When he arrived, there were around seventy or eighty prominent scholars present, many of whom were renowned memorizers of hadith, some said to have memorized tens of thousands of narrations.
After the meal, they sought a pretext to begin a discussion. Allama Amini reminded them:
"Our agreement was that this would be only a dinner gathering."
One of them replied:
"Very well. Let us not debate. Instead, each scholar can simply recite a hadith."
The suggestion was accepted. One by one, the scholars recited narrations.
When it was Allama Amini's turn, he said:
"I will narrate a hadith on one condition: after I recite it, each of you must state your opinion regarding its authenticity."
They agreed.
He then narrated:
After the narration was recited, he turned to the scholars one by one and asked them about its chain of transmission and authenticity.
Each acknowledged that the hadith was authentic.
Then Allama Amini asked a single question:
"Did Fatimah al-Zahra know the Imam of her time or not?"
Silence filled the gathering.
"Who was the Imam of Fatimah?"
No one answered.
The scholars lowered their heads. For a long while, no response was given. Eventually, they began leaving one by one without saying a word.
A preacher who later recounted this incident said:
"I swear by Allah that I myself raised this very question in Masjid al-Haram."
He described how his discussion partner simply smiled when asked to answer.
"Why are you smiling?" he asked.
The man replied:
"I am smiling at myself, because I do not know what to say."
"If I say that Fatimah did not know the Imam of her time, then according to the hadith I must conclude something impossible regarding the daughter of the Prophet. But if I say she did know the Imam of her time, how can I say that Abu Bakr was her Imam when the historical reports state that she passed away while deeply displeased with him? Can someone be angry with the Imam whom he is religiously obliged to follow?"
And so, the question remained unanswered.
#AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #Hadith
https://eitaa.com/solok_shieh/13651
🆔 @rahyafte_en
During the height of his fame, the renowned scholar Allama Abdul Husayn Amini was invited to a dinner gathering while visiting either Makkah or Madinah.
The hosts were known for theological disputes and intended to engage him in debate. Allama Amini accepted the invitation on one condition:
"I will attend only if there is no discussion or argument—just a dinner gathering."
They agreed, but among themselves they thought, "Let him come; we will find a way to challenge him."
When he arrived, there were around seventy or eighty prominent scholars present, many of whom were renowned memorizers of hadith, some said to have memorized tens of thousands of narrations.
After the meal, they sought a pretext to begin a discussion. Allama Amini reminded them:
"Our agreement was that this would be only a dinner gathering."
One of them replied:
"Very well. Let us not debate. Instead, each scholar can simply recite a hadith."
The suggestion was accepted. One by one, the scholars recited narrations.
When it was Allama Amini's turn, he said:
"I will narrate a hadith on one condition: after I recite it, each of you must state your opinion regarding its authenticity."
They agreed.
He then narrated:
"Whoever dies without knowing the Imam of his time dies the death of ignorance (Jahiliyyah)."
After the narration was recited, he turned to the scholars one by one and asked them about its chain of transmission and authenticity.
Each acknowledged that the hadith was authentic.
Then Allama Amini asked a single question:
"Did Fatimah al-Zahra know the Imam of her time or not?"
Silence filled the gathering.
"Who was the Imam of Fatimah?"
No one answered.
The scholars lowered their heads. For a long while, no response was given. Eventually, they began leaving one by one without saying a word.
A preacher who later recounted this incident said:
"I swear by Allah that I myself raised this very question in Masjid al-Haram."
He described how his discussion partner simply smiled when asked to answer.
"Why are you smiling?" he asked.
The man replied:
"I am smiling at myself, because I do not know what to say."
"If I say that Fatimah did not know the Imam of her time, then according to the hadith I must conclude something impossible regarding the daughter of the Prophet. But if I say she did know the Imam of her time, how can I say that Abu Bakr was her Imam when the historical reports state that she passed away while deeply displeased with him? Can someone be angry with the Imam whom he is religiously obliged to follow?"
And so, the question remained unanswered.
#AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #Hadith
https://eitaa.com/solok_shieh/13651
🆔 @rahyafte_en
The End of an Era 🕋
On the occasion of the collapse of the Umayyad dynasty following the assassination of Marwan ibn Muhammad (Marwan al-Himar) , the last Umayyad caliph, in 132 AH (750 CE) .
But was this merely the fall of a ruling family, or the logical conclusion of a much deeper legacy?
🔍 A controversial genealogical inquiry suggests that the Umayyads were not just political rivals of the Hashimites, but perhaps ideological and racial adversaries with a very different origin.
Key points from the analysis:
· The Cursed Tree: The Prophet (PBUH) reportedly applied the “accursed tree” in the Qur’an to the Umayyads.
· Monkey Metaphor: A disturbing dream of monkeys climbing his pulpit was interpreted by the Prophet as referring to the Umayyads, reminiscent of the Jewish punishment of being transformed into apes.
· Unnatural Hostility: An unrelenting, generational war against the Hashimites – from Abu Sufyan vs. the Prophet, Muawiyah vs. Imam Ali, to Yazid vs. Imam Husayn (AS).
· Questionable Lineage: Strong evidence from early Islamic historians suggesting Abu Amr (Dhukwan) was a Jewish freed slave from Saffuriyya, not a true Qurayshi. Accusations of adultery, adoption, and Roman/Jewish roots surround the Umayyad ancestry.
📜 One striking quote from Imam Ali (AS) to Muawiyah:
“Freedmen and their children have nothing to do with the early migrants… the sound of the gaming piece proves it is not from the same set.” (Nahj al-Balaghah)
📖 Read the full documented study (Persian original with footnotes):
👉 Click here for the in-depth article (En)
Was the Umayyad Caliphate a continuation of a non-Arab, Judeo-Roman priestly ambition? Judge for yourself.
#IslamicHistory #Umayyads #EndOfUmayyad #MarwanII #HistoryUnveiled
---
🆔 @rahyafte_en
On the occasion of the collapse of the Umayyad dynasty following the assassination of Marwan ibn Muhammad (Marwan al-Himar) , the last Umayyad caliph, in 132 AH (750 CE) .
But was this merely the fall of a ruling family, or the logical conclusion of a much deeper legacy?
🔍 A controversial genealogical inquiry suggests that the Umayyads were not just political rivals of the Hashimites, but perhaps ideological and racial adversaries with a very different origin.
Key points from the analysis:
· The Cursed Tree: The Prophet (PBUH) reportedly applied the “accursed tree” in the Qur’an to the Umayyads.
· Monkey Metaphor: A disturbing dream of monkeys climbing his pulpit was interpreted by the Prophet as referring to the Umayyads, reminiscent of the Jewish punishment of being transformed into apes.
· Unnatural Hostility: An unrelenting, generational war against the Hashimites – from Abu Sufyan vs. the Prophet, Muawiyah vs. Imam Ali, to Yazid vs. Imam Husayn (AS).
· Questionable Lineage: Strong evidence from early Islamic historians suggesting Abu Amr (Dhukwan) was a Jewish freed slave from Saffuriyya, not a true Qurayshi. Accusations of adultery, adoption, and Roman/Jewish roots surround the Umayyad ancestry.
📜 One striking quote from Imam Ali (AS) to Muawiyah:
“Freedmen and their children have nothing to do with the early migrants… the sound of the gaming piece proves it is not from the same set.” (Nahj al-Balaghah)
📖 Read the full documented study (Persian original with footnotes):
👉 Click here for the in-depth article (En)
Was the Umayyad Caliphate a continuation of a non-Arab, Judeo-Roman priestly ambition? Judge for yourself.
#IslamicHistory #Umayyads #EndOfUmayyad #MarwanII #HistoryUnveiled
---
🆔 @rahyafte_en
📆 Today's Calendar
🌞 Thursday | July 2, 2026
☪️ 17 Muharram 1448 AH
✝️ July 2, 2026 CE
🕎 17 Tammuz 5786 Hebrew
✍ Islamic Occasion: Demise of Abdullah, Father of the Prophet (PBUH)
---
📚 Islam and Historical Jewish Terrorism
🔍 Tabar-e Enheraf (The Deviation Lineage); Part 13
---
🎯 Defining "Terror":
• Terror (Assassination) = Targeted, surprise killing (Arabic: Fatik)
• Contrary to claims, the Prophet (PBUH) never committed blind terror
• The killing of Ka'b ibn al-Ashraf was NOT terrorism, as the ruling was public and he knew he was wanted
---
🕯️ Jewish Efforts to Extinguish the Light of Prophethood:
1️⃣ Assassination of Hashim (Prophet's Grandfather):
• Poisoned in Gaza; his will emphasized protecting his unborn son (Abdul-Muttalib)
• 📍 His grave is in Gaza, Palestine
2️⃣ Assassination Attempt on Abdul-Muttalib:
• Jews attacked him on the road to Mecca, but he was miraculously saved
3️⃣ Assassination Attempts on Abdullah (Prophet's Father):
• Jews tried multiple times to kill him
• After marrying Amina, the prophetic light in his forehead transferred to her
• He died mysteriously in Medina (the Jewish center) while returning from Syria ⚠️
4️⃣ Attempts to Assassinate the Prophet (PBUH) Himself:
• A Jewish scholar recognized him the day after his birth, exclaiming: "This is the one who will destroy the Children of Israel!"
• 😱 He fainted from shock!
---
🛡️ Protective Measures for the Prophet (PBUH):
🔹 Sent Away from Mecca (to Haleemah al-Sa'diyah):
• Under pretexts (mother's lack of milk, bad climate, Arab custom) – but all are critiqueable 🧐
• Stayed 5 years (unlike the usual 2-year custom)
• When Jews identified him in that region, Haleemah returned him
🔹 Abdul-Muttalib's Constant Guard:
• Even brought the Prophet to council meetings
• In his will, he appointed Abu Talib (not his eldest son) as guardian, with the primary command to protect Muhammad (PBUH) ✍️
🔹 Abu Talib's Sacrifices:
• Gave up trade for 4 years to protect the Prophet
• Ate before the Prophet to check for poison ☠️
• Slept next to him at night
• On a trip to Syria, Bahira (a Christian monk) warned: "Return him to Mecca quickly, lest the Jews get to him" ✝️⚠️
---
💡 Important Note:
🔴 7 Jews came near Bahira to assassinate the Prophet (PBUH) – but they failed
---
📚 Source: Tabar-e Enheraf (The Deviation Lineage), by Hojjat al-Islam Mahdi Taeb, 8th Edition
https://jscenter.ir/judaism-and-islam/jewish-intrigue/3582
---
#IslamicHistory #Judaism #Terrorism #ProphetMuhammad #TabarEnheraf #Ashura #Muharram
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🌞 Thursday | July 2, 2026
☪️ 17 Muharram 1448 AH
✝️ July 2, 2026 CE
🕎 17 Tammuz 5786 Hebrew
✍ Islamic Occasion: Demise of Abdullah, Father of the Prophet (PBUH)
---
📚 Islam and Historical Jewish Terrorism
🔍 Tabar-e Enheraf (The Deviation Lineage); Part 13
---
🎯 Defining "Terror":
• Terror (Assassination) = Targeted, surprise killing (Arabic: Fatik)
• Contrary to claims, the Prophet (PBUH) never committed blind terror
• The killing of Ka'b ibn al-Ashraf was NOT terrorism, as the ruling was public and he knew he was wanted
---
🕯️ Jewish Efforts to Extinguish the Light of Prophethood:
1️⃣ Assassination of Hashim (Prophet's Grandfather):
• Poisoned in Gaza; his will emphasized protecting his unborn son (Abdul-Muttalib)
• 📍 His grave is in Gaza, Palestine
2️⃣ Assassination Attempt on Abdul-Muttalib:
• Jews attacked him on the road to Mecca, but he was miraculously saved
3️⃣ Assassination Attempts on Abdullah (Prophet's Father):
• Jews tried multiple times to kill him
• After marrying Amina, the prophetic light in his forehead transferred to her
• He died mysteriously in Medina (the Jewish center) while returning from Syria ⚠️
4️⃣ Attempts to Assassinate the Prophet (PBUH) Himself:
• A Jewish scholar recognized him the day after his birth, exclaiming: "This is the one who will destroy the Children of Israel!"
• 😱 He fainted from shock!
---
🛡️ Protective Measures for the Prophet (PBUH):
🔹 Sent Away from Mecca (to Haleemah al-Sa'diyah):
• Under pretexts (mother's lack of milk, bad climate, Arab custom) – but all are critiqueable 🧐
• Stayed 5 years (unlike the usual 2-year custom)
• When Jews identified him in that region, Haleemah returned him
🔹 Abdul-Muttalib's Constant Guard:
• Even brought the Prophet to council meetings
• In his will, he appointed Abu Talib (not his eldest son) as guardian, with the primary command to protect Muhammad (PBUH) ✍️
🔹 Abu Talib's Sacrifices:
• Gave up trade for 4 years to protect the Prophet
• Ate before the Prophet to check for poison ☠️
• Slept next to him at night
• On a trip to Syria, Bahira (a Christian monk) warned: "Return him to Mecca quickly, lest the Jews get to him" ✝️⚠️
---
💡 Important Note:
🔴 7 Jews came near Bahira to assassinate the Prophet (PBUH) – but they failed
---
📚 Source: Tabar-e Enheraf (The Deviation Lineage), by Hojjat al-Islam Mahdi Taeb, 8th Edition
https://jscenter.ir/judaism-and-islam/jewish-intrigue/3582
---
#IslamicHistory #Judaism #Terrorism #ProphetMuhammad #TabarEnheraf #Ashura #Muharram
🆔 @rahyafte_en
Forwarded from Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
🔴 From Banu Umayyah to Sufyani—The Role of Iranians in Two Historical Eras
✍️ By Mostafa Amiri
🔹 The rise of Sufyani mirrors the actions of Banu Umayyah against Imam Ali, Imam Hasan, and Imam Husayn.
🔸 Muawiyah established his dominance over Sham (Syria) during Imam Ali’s time. Under Imam Hasan, he extended control over Iraq, and during Yazid’s rule, the takeover of Hijaz was completed.
🔺 Similarly, Sufyani will begin his march from Syria and advance toward Arabia.
Key Difference Between the Two Eras
📌 In early Islamic history:
🔹 Iranians were at their lowest political influence, and the Arabs were tested in leadership.
📌 In the End Times:
🔹 Iranians will reach the peak of their historical power, playing a crucial role in regional events, ensuring the success of the global Islamic movement.
📖 Quranic verses and narrations affirm Iran’s significant role in these events.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1093
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🌐 @rahyafte_en
#IslamicHistory #Sufyani #Iran #EndTimes #ImamMahdi #Geopolitics
✍️ By Mostafa Amiri
🔹 The rise of Sufyani mirrors the actions of Banu Umayyah against Imam Ali, Imam Hasan, and Imam Husayn.
🔸 Muawiyah established his dominance over Sham (Syria) during Imam Ali’s time. Under Imam Hasan, he extended control over Iraq, and during Yazid’s rule, the takeover of Hijaz was completed.
🔺 Similarly, Sufyani will begin his march from Syria and advance toward Arabia.
Key Difference Between the Two Eras
📌 In early Islamic history:
🔹 Iranians were at their lowest political influence, and the Arabs were tested in leadership.
📌 In the End Times:
🔹 Iranians will reach the peak of their historical power, playing a crucial role in regional events, ensuring the success of the global Islamic movement.
📖 Quranic verses and narrations affirm Iran’s significant role in these events.
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/asrzohur110/1093
🆔 @ASRZOHUR110
🌐 @rahyafte_en
#IslamicHistory #Sufyani #Iran #EndTimes #ImamMahdi #Geopolitics
❌ “Perhaps the Prophet ﷺ meant only friendship.”
The proposed document, according to this interpretation, would have removed such ambiguity.
6⃣ 📖 OTHER HADITHS CONCERNING IMAM ALI (ع)
Al-Maliki also stresses that Ghadir is not the only evidence discussed in the Islamic tradition.
He refers to other reports and virtues associated with Imam Ali (ع), including:
🔹 Hadith al-Manzilah — “You are to me as Aaron was to Moses…”
🔹 The Hadith of Brotherhood
🔹 The narration concerning Buraidah
🔹 Other reports concerning Ali’s (ع) exceptional position and virtues.
His argument is that these narrations should not necessarily be examined in isolation.
Rather, their combined meaning and historical context should be considered.
7⃣ ❗ “THE UMMAH FAILED THE TEST”
Perhaps the most provocative conclusion in al-Maliki’s discussion is his assessment of what followed.
According to his interpretation, the Prophet ﷺ made the matter clear, but the Ummah ultimately failed to accept the full implications of that declaration.
Thus, the question becomes much larger than a disagreement between historical personalities.
It becomes a question of:
Who has the final authority when the Messenger of Allah ﷺ speaks?
📌 The Prophet ﷺ — or the political judgment of those around him?
🧩 THE CENTRAL QUESTION
The entire episode can therefore be summarized in one fundamental question:
If the Prophet ﷺ asked for a written document that would prevent the Ummah from going astray, why was that request not fulfilled?
And if the answer is that another person believed his own judgment was sufficient, then:
⚠️ Can a believer place that judgment above the explicit request of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ?
This is precisely the dilemma that Hasan Farhan al-Maliki argues Sunnis must confront honestly.
🔥 THE QUESTION OF GHADIR REMAINS
Was Ghadir merely a declaration of love and friendship toward Imam Ali (ع)?
Or was it part of a broader prophetic effort to establish Ali’s position and leadership after the Messenger of Allah ﷺ?
And was the Calamity of Thursday the final opportunity to put that matter beyond dispute?
These are not merely historical questions. They go to the heart of how the authority of the Prophet ﷺ is understood.
🎬 https://t.me/jscenter/22029
🇮🇷 👉 @jew_media
#HasanFarhanAlMaliki #HadithOfThePen #RaziyyatAlKhamis #Ghadir #GhadirKhumm #ImamAli #AliIbnAbiTalib #AhlulBayt #SunniIslam #Hadith #IslamicHistory
🆔 @rahyafte_en
The proposed document, according to this interpretation, would have removed such ambiguity.
6⃣ 📖 OTHER HADITHS CONCERNING IMAM ALI (ع)
Al-Maliki also stresses that Ghadir is not the only evidence discussed in the Islamic tradition.
He refers to other reports and virtues associated with Imam Ali (ع), including:
🔹 Hadith al-Manzilah — “You are to me as Aaron was to Moses…”
🔹 The Hadith of Brotherhood
🔹 The narration concerning Buraidah
🔹 Other reports concerning Ali’s (ع) exceptional position and virtues.
His argument is that these narrations should not necessarily be examined in isolation.
Rather, their combined meaning and historical context should be considered.
7⃣ ❗ “THE UMMAH FAILED THE TEST”
Perhaps the most provocative conclusion in al-Maliki’s discussion is his assessment of what followed.
According to his interpretation, the Prophet ﷺ made the matter clear, but the Ummah ultimately failed to accept the full implications of that declaration.
Thus, the question becomes much larger than a disagreement between historical personalities.
It becomes a question of:
Who has the final authority when the Messenger of Allah ﷺ speaks?
📌 The Prophet ﷺ — or the political judgment of those around him?
🧩 THE CENTRAL QUESTION
The entire episode can therefore be summarized in one fundamental question:
If the Prophet ﷺ asked for a written document that would prevent the Ummah from going astray, why was that request not fulfilled?
And if the answer is that another person believed his own judgment was sufficient, then:
⚠️ Can a believer place that judgment above the explicit request of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ?
This is precisely the dilemma that Hasan Farhan al-Maliki argues Sunnis must confront honestly.
🔥 THE QUESTION OF GHADIR REMAINS
Was Ghadir merely a declaration of love and friendship toward Imam Ali (ع)?
Or was it part of a broader prophetic effort to establish Ali’s position and leadership after the Messenger of Allah ﷺ?
And was the Calamity of Thursday the final opportunity to put that matter beyond dispute?
These are not merely historical questions. They go to the heart of how the authority of the Prophet ﷺ is understood.
🎬 https://t.me/jscenter/22029
🇮🇷 👉 @jew_media
#HasanFarhanAlMaliki #HadithOfThePen #RaziyyatAlKhamis #Ghadir #GhadirKhumm #ImamAli #AliIbnAbiTalib #AhlulBayt #SunniIslam #Hadith #IslamicHistory
🆔 @rahyafte_en
Telegram
اندیشکده مطالعات یهود
🚨 اعترافات جالب حسن فرحان مالکی از محققین و علمای بزرگ اهل سنت
💥 خلاصهٔ کلام این عالم و محقق بزرگ عربستانی:
1⃣ #حدیث_قرطاس یا حدیث قلم و دوات (رَزِيَّةُ يَوْمِ الْخَميس) علاوه بر اینکه در صحیح بخاری و صحیح مسلم آمده، با ٣ سند متفاوت در آنجا ذکر شده است.…
💥 خلاصهٔ کلام این عالم و محقق بزرگ عربستانی:
1⃣ #حدیث_قرطاس یا حدیث قلم و دوات (رَزِيَّةُ يَوْمِ الْخَميس) علاوه بر اینکه در صحیح بخاری و صحیح مسلم آمده، با ٣ سند متفاوت در آنجا ذکر شده است.…
This protection continued until Muhammad ﷺ reached approximately 25 years of age.
At that point, Muhammad ﷺ himself asked to enter the world of trade.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🌙 A Life Protected for a Greater Mission
From the birth of ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib to the childhood of Muhammad ﷺ, the story follows a continuous chain:
Hāshim → ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib → ʿAbdullah → Muhammad ﷺ
The narrative is one of prophetic lineage, recognition, danger, sacrifice, and protection.
ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib protected his grandson until his final days.
Then Abū Ṭālib inherited that responsibility and devoted himself to safeguarding Muhammad ﷺ through his childhood and youth.
✨ The story of the Prophet's ﷺ early life is therefore also a story of those who stood around him, protected him, and preserved the child who would become the final Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📚 Further Reading
📖 Islam and Historical Jewish Terrorism
https://jscenter.ir/judaism-and-islam/jewish-intrigue/3582
📖 Source cited:
Hojjat al-Islam Mehdi Taeb, Tabar-e Enheraf (Genealogy of Deviation), Qom, 2013.
🔹 JS Center — Institute for Jewish Studies
🇮🇷 👉 @jscenter
#Islam #ProphetMuhammad #Muhammadﷺ #AbdulMuttalib #Abdullah #AbuTalib #Aminah #Halima #Bahira #Seerah #IslamicHistory #RabiAlAwwal #ProphetOfIslam
🆔 @rahyafte_en
At that point, Muhammad ﷺ himself asked to enter the world of trade.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🌙 A Life Protected for a Greater Mission
From the birth of ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib to the childhood of Muhammad ﷺ, the story follows a continuous chain:
Hāshim → ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib → ʿAbdullah → Muhammad ﷺ
The narrative is one of prophetic lineage, recognition, danger, sacrifice, and protection.
ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib protected his grandson until his final days.
Then Abū Ṭālib inherited that responsibility and devoted himself to safeguarding Muhammad ﷺ through his childhood and youth.
✨ The story of the Prophet's ﷺ early life is therefore also a story of those who stood around him, protected him, and preserved the child who would become the final Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📚 Further Reading
📖 Islam and Historical Jewish Terrorism
https://jscenter.ir/judaism-and-islam/jewish-intrigue/3582
📖 Source cited:
Hojjat al-Islam Mehdi Taeb, Tabar-e Enheraf (Genealogy of Deviation), Qom, 2013.
🔹 JS Center — Institute for Jewish Studies
🇮🇷 👉 @jscenter
#Islam #ProphetMuhammad #Muhammadﷺ #AbdulMuttalib #Abdullah #AbuTalib #Aminah #Halima #Bahira #Seerah #IslamicHistory #RabiAlAwwal #ProphetOfIslam
🆔 @rahyafte_en
اندیشکده مطالعات یهود | Jewish Studies Center
اسلام و تروریسم تاریخی یهود - اندیشکده مطالعات یهود | Jewish Studies Center
اگر ریشه تروریسم را در تاریخ بجوییم، درمییابیم که یهودیان بنیانگذار آن بودهاند. ازجمله تلاشهای یهود برای جلوگیری از تولد پیامبر اسلام
The Day God Was Pleased—and the Day the Prophet Was Martyred
🔷 The Day God Was Pleased—and the Day the Prophet Was Martyred
The verses of Tabligh (5:67) and Ikmal (5:3) illuminate the central place of the wilayah of Imam Ali (peace be upon him) within the structure of Islam.
The mission of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ did not reach its completion merely by conveying a collection of laws and teachings. The proclamation of wilayah was the link that completed this divine mission.
The Qur’an declares:
And following the event of Ghadir, Allah declares:
Ghadir, therefore, was not merely a political or historical event. It was the moment when the structure of divine religion was completed through wilayah, ensuring that the path of guidance would continue after the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
Even during the final days of his life, amid illness and suffering, the Prophet ﷺ continued to strive to preserve this path and establish the wilayah of Imam Ali (peace be upon him).
From this perspective, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ can be regarded as the first martyr of the path of wilayah—the Prophet who carried his mission to his final breath in defense of the true path of Islam.
His final days reveal not only the depth of his suffering, but also the magnitude of his concern for the future of the Ummah. His message was not merely about establishing a religion; it was about ensuring that divine guidance would not be abandoned after his departure.
The loneliness of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, his suffering, and the events surrounding his final illness remain among the most painful chapters in the history of Islam.
The Prophet completed his mission.
Ghadir completed the religion.
And the Messenger of Allah ﷺ became the first martyr on the path of wilayah.
May Allah grant us the understanding and loyalty to the path of Muhammad ﷺ and the Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them).
#Ghadir #Wilayah #ImamAli #AliIbnAbiTalib #AyatAlTabligh #AyatAlIkmal #Imamate #ProphetMuhammad #AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #Shiism #GhadirKhum #MessengerOfAllah #MartyrdomOfTheProphet #Seerah #MuhammadKhaneifarzadeh #SahebMedia
🔗 Saheb Media:
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2699
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔷 The Day God Was Pleased—and the Day the Prophet Was Martyred
The verses of Tabligh (5:67) and Ikmal (5:3) illuminate the central place of the wilayah of Imam Ali (peace be upon him) within the structure of Islam.
The mission of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ did not reach its completion merely by conveying a collection of laws and teachings. The proclamation of wilayah was the link that completed this divine mission.
The Qur’an declares:
“O Messenger! Convey what has been revealed to you from your Lord…”
(Qur’an 5:67)
And following the event of Ghadir, Allah declares:
“Today I have perfected your religion for you, completed My favor upon you, and chosen Islam as your religion.”
(Qur’an 5:3)
Ghadir, therefore, was not merely a political or historical event. It was the moment when the structure of divine religion was completed through wilayah, ensuring that the path of guidance would continue after the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.
Even during the final days of his life, amid illness and suffering, the Prophet ﷺ continued to strive to preserve this path and establish the wilayah of Imam Ali (peace be upon him).
From this perspective, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ can be regarded as the first martyr of the path of wilayah—the Prophet who carried his mission to his final breath in defense of the true path of Islam.
His final days reveal not only the depth of his suffering, but also the magnitude of his concern for the future of the Ummah. His message was not merely about establishing a religion; it was about ensuring that divine guidance would not be abandoned after his departure.
The loneliness of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, his suffering, and the events surrounding his final illness remain among the most painful chapters in the history of Islam.
The Prophet completed his mission.
Ghadir completed the religion.
And the Messenger of Allah ﷺ became the first martyr on the path of wilayah.
May Allah grant us the understanding and loyalty to the path of Muhammad ﷺ and the Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them).
#Ghadir #Wilayah #ImamAli #AliIbnAbiTalib #AyatAlTabligh #AyatAlIkmal #Imamate #ProphetMuhammad #AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #Shiism #GhadirKhum #MessengerOfAllah #MartyrdomOfTheProphet #Seerah #MuhammadKhaneifarzadeh #SahebMedia
🔗 Saheb Media:
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2699
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔷 A Strange Admission by Abu Bakr
One of the well-known principles of Islamic jurisprudence is:
In other words, when a mentally competent person acknowledges something against his own interests, that admission carries significant legal weight.
This principle raises an important historical question concerning Abu Bakr, the first caliph.
According to reports attributed to Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf, Abu Bakr, during the final hours of his life, expressed deep regret over three matters. Among the statements attributed to him is:
If this report is accepted as authentic, its implications are profound.
It would mean that, at the end of his life, Abu Bakr himself expressed regret over actions involving the house of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (peace be upon her)—the daughter of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ and a member of the Ahl al-Bayt.
The issue becomes even more serious when considered alongside reports concerning the use of fire as a means of punishment. The Prophetic tradition contains explicit prohibitions against punishing people by fire, reserving punishment by fire for Allah.
Therefore, the historical question remains:
If the report of Abu Bakr’s final admission is authentic, what does his own regret tell us about what happened to the household of Fatimah al-Zahra (peace be upon her)?
For those who study the history of the early Islamic period, this is not merely a question of politics.
It is a question of testimony, responsibility, and the sanctity of the household of the Prophet ﷺ.
May Allah grant us the courage to examine history with honesty, justice, and without fear.
#HistoricalAdmission #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #HouseOfFatimah #IslamicHistory #AbuBakr #Wilayah #ShiaIslam #ProphetMuhammad #AhlAlBayt #IslamicJurisprudence #HistoryOfIslam #SahebMedia #MuhammadKhaneifarzadeh
🔗 Saheb Media:
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2720
🆔 @rahyafte_en
One of the well-known principles of Islamic jurisprudence is:
“The admission of a sane person against himself is legally binding.”
(Al-iqrar ‘ala al-nafs)
In other words, when a mentally competent person acknowledges something against his own interests, that admission carries significant legal weight.
This principle raises an important historical question concerning Abu Bakr, the first caliph.
According to reports attributed to Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf, Abu Bakr, during the final hours of his life, expressed deep regret over three matters. Among the statements attributed to him is:
“I wish I had not opened Fatimah’s house, even if it had been closed for confrontation, and I wish I had not sent men into it by force.”
If this report is accepted as authentic, its implications are profound.
It would mean that, at the end of his life, Abu Bakr himself expressed regret over actions involving the house of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (peace be upon her)—the daughter of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ and a member of the Ahl al-Bayt.
The issue becomes even more serious when considered alongside reports concerning the use of fire as a means of punishment. The Prophetic tradition contains explicit prohibitions against punishing people by fire, reserving punishment by fire for Allah.
Therefore, the historical question remains:
If the report of Abu Bakr’s final admission is authentic, what does his own regret tell us about what happened to the household of Fatimah al-Zahra (peace be upon her)?
For those who study the history of the early Islamic period, this is not merely a question of politics.
It is a question of testimony, responsibility, and the sanctity of the household of the Prophet ﷺ.
May Allah grant us the courage to examine history with honesty, justice, and without fear.
#HistoricalAdmission #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #HouseOfFatimah #IslamicHistory #AbuBakr #Wilayah #ShiaIslam #ProphetMuhammad #AhlAlBayt #IslamicJurisprudence #HistoryOfIslam #SahebMedia #MuhammadKhaneifarzadeh
🔗 Saheb Media:
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2720
🆔 @rahyafte_en
Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
🔷 How to Understand History Intelligently Approaches to the Burning of the House of Fāṭimah To understand the hidden realities of early Islamic history, we must avoid two extremes: blind acceptance of every historical report and blind denial of every uncomfortable…
The first historical questions should be more precise:
Was there a confrontation at Fāṭimah's house?
Were there threats involving fire?
Was pressure applied to obtain allegiance?
Which early sources preserve these reports?
How independent are the traditions?
What details are historically secure, and which remain disputed?
How did later political and theological developments affect the transmission of these reports?
This is what understanding history means.
Not accepting everything.
Not denying everything.
But following the evidence wherever it leads.
And when the evidence concerns Fāṭimah al-Zahrāʾ (سلام الله عليها), the daughter of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, the subject deserves particular care, precision, and intellectual honesty.
The name of Fāṭimah remains one of the clearest moral dividing lines in the history of Islam.
History may be censored.
Sources may be selective.
Narratives may be rewritten.
But the task of the historian remains the same: search, compare, verify—and never surrender the truth to inherited slogans.
#History #IslamicHistory #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #EarlyIslam #HouseOfFatimah #HistoricalResearch #SourceCriticism #UmarIbnAlKhattab #UrwahIbnAlZubayr #MusaIbnUqbah #AlWaqidi #AhlulBaytHistory #UnderstandingHistory
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2722
🆔 @rahyafte_en
Was there a confrontation at Fāṭimah's house?
Were there threats involving fire?
Was pressure applied to obtain allegiance?
Which early sources preserve these reports?
How independent are the traditions?
What details are historically secure, and which remain disputed?
How did later political and theological developments affect the transmission of these reports?
This is what understanding history means.
Not accepting everything.
Not denying everything.
But following the evidence wherever it leads.
And when the evidence concerns Fāṭimah al-Zahrāʾ (سلام الله عليها), the daughter of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, the subject deserves particular care, precision, and intellectual honesty.
The name of Fāṭimah remains one of the clearest moral dividing lines in the history of Islam.
History may be censored.
Sources may be selective.
Narratives may be rewritten.
But the task of the historian remains the same: search, compare, verify—and never surrender the truth to inherited slogans.
#History #IslamicHistory #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #EarlyIslam #HouseOfFatimah #HistoricalResearch #SourceCriticism #UmarIbnAlKhattab #UrwahIbnAlZubayr #MusaIbnUqbah #AlWaqidi #AhlulBaytHistory #UnderstandingHistory
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2722
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔷 What Did Ibn Taymiyyah Say About Abu Bakr?
A Historical Admission—or a Defensive Justification?
Sometimes, when investigating a historical event, the most revealing evidence does not come from its opponents, but from the way its defenders attempt to explain it.
One noteworthy example is a passage found in Ibn Taymiyyah’s famous work Minhāj al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah, volume 8, page 291, in his discussion of the reports concerning the house of Fāṭimah al-Zahrāʾ (سلام الله عليها).
Ibn Taymiyyah writes:
This passage deserves careful attention.
🔸 Ibn Taymiyyah himself preserves the claim that Abū Bakr entered Fāṭimah’s house in order to investigate whether public property was present there.
🔸 He uses the expression “kabas al-bayt” (كبس البيت)—a term that does not ordinarily describe a casual visit, but rather conveys the idea of entering upon a place with force or pressure.
🔸 However, it would be historically inaccurate to claim that Ibn Taymiyyah thereby accepted the entire Shīʿī account of the attack. He presents the statement within an argument and then attempts to justify Abū Bakr’s alleged action. Therefore, the passage should be understood in its full context.
So the more precise historical question is not simply:
❌ “Did Ibn Taymiyyah openly accept the Shīʿī version of the attack?”
Rather, we should ask:
Why does Ibn Taymiyyah, while defending Abū Bakr, even discuss a scenario in which Abū Bakr entered Fāṭimah’s house to investigate property?
And more importantly:
What source was Ibn Taymiyyah relying upon when presenting this claim?
This is precisely where historical research must move beyond slogans and enter the realm of source criticism and contextual analysis.
🔸 An Important Point
In the same discussion, Ibn Taymiyyah attempts to argue that Abū Bakr did not harm ʿAlī, al-Zubayr, or the other opponents of his rule, while presenting the alleged entry into the house as an act motivated by concern over “the property of Allah” and its distribution.
Therefore, even someone who rejects the Shīʿī interpretation of these events cannot simply claim:
“There is absolutely no historical report about Abū Bakr entering Fāṭimah’s house.”
Such a statement would be difficult to reconcile with the passage preserved in Minhāj al-Sunnah.
At the same time, intellectual honesty requires another distinction:
This passage by itself does not establish every detail found in Shīʿī accounts—such as the breaking of the door, physical assault, or the martyrdom of al-Muḥassin.
Each of those claims requires its own independent examination of the sources.
But the passage is still historically significant enough to raise an important question:
🔻 This Is How We Should Read History
Do not accept every claim without examination.
But do not reject every uncomfortable report simply because it challenges a familiar narrative.
Read the text.
Examine the wording.
Study the context.
Identify the source.
Then draw the conclusion.
The house of Fāṭimah al-Zahrāʾ (سلام الله عليها) is not merely a historical detail.
It is one of the most important points of dispute in understanding the events that followed the death of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.
And if we truly want to understand history, we must be willing to examine both the evidence and the arguments of those who oppose our interpretation.
📚 Minhāj al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah, Ibn Taymiyyah, vol. 8, p. 291.
#IbnTaymiyyah #MinhajAlSunnah #AbuBakr #FatimahAlZahra #HouseOfFatimah #AttackOnFatimahsHouse #AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #HistoricalResearch #SourceCriticism #EarlyIslamicHistory #AhlulBaytHistory #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2723
🆔 @rahyafte_en
A Historical Admission—or a Defensive Justification?
Sometimes, when investigating a historical event, the most revealing evidence does not come from its opponents, but from the way its defenders attempt to explain it.
One noteworthy example is a passage found in Ibn Taymiyyah’s famous work Minhāj al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah, volume 8, page 291, in his discussion of the reports concerning the house of Fāṭimah al-Zahrāʾ (سلام الله عليها).
Ibn Taymiyyah writes:
“The most that can be said is that he entered the house to see whether there was any of the public treasury’s property there…”
This passage deserves careful attention.
🔸 Ibn Taymiyyah himself preserves the claim that Abū Bakr entered Fāṭimah’s house in order to investigate whether public property was present there.
🔸 He uses the expression “kabas al-bayt” (كبس البيت)—a term that does not ordinarily describe a casual visit, but rather conveys the idea of entering upon a place with force or pressure.
🔸 However, it would be historically inaccurate to claim that Ibn Taymiyyah thereby accepted the entire Shīʿī account of the attack. He presents the statement within an argument and then attempts to justify Abū Bakr’s alleged action. Therefore, the passage should be understood in its full context.
So the more precise historical question is not simply:
❌ “Did Ibn Taymiyyah openly accept the Shīʿī version of the attack?”
Rather, we should ask:
Why does Ibn Taymiyyah, while defending Abū Bakr, even discuss a scenario in which Abū Bakr entered Fāṭimah’s house to investigate property?
And more importantly:
What source was Ibn Taymiyyah relying upon when presenting this claim?
This is precisely where historical research must move beyond slogans and enter the realm of source criticism and contextual analysis.
🔸 An Important Point
In the same discussion, Ibn Taymiyyah attempts to argue that Abū Bakr did not harm ʿAlī, al-Zubayr, or the other opponents of his rule, while presenting the alleged entry into the house as an act motivated by concern over “the property of Allah” and its distribution.
Therefore, even someone who rejects the Shīʿī interpretation of these events cannot simply claim:
“There is absolutely no historical report about Abū Bakr entering Fāṭimah’s house.”
Such a statement would be difficult to reconcile with the passage preserved in Minhāj al-Sunnah.
At the same time, intellectual honesty requires another distinction:
This passage by itself does not establish every detail found in Shīʿī accounts—such as the breaking of the door, physical assault, or the martyrdom of al-Muḥassin.
Each of those claims requires its own independent examination of the sources.
But the passage is still historically significant enough to raise an important question:
If there was no historical basis whatsoever for such an incident, why would one of Abū Bakr’s strongest defenders discuss his entering Fāṭimah’s house in the first place?
🔻 This Is How We Should Read History
Do not accept every claim without examination.
But do not reject every uncomfortable report simply because it challenges a familiar narrative.
Read the text.
Examine the wording.
Study the context.
Identify the source.
Then draw the conclusion.
The house of Fāṭimah al-Zahrāʾ (سلام الله عليها) is not merely a historical detail.
It is one of the most important points of dispute in understanding the events that followed the death of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.
And if we truly want to understand history, we must be willing to examine both the evidence and the arguments of those who oppose our interpretation.
📚 Minhāj al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah, Ibn Taymiyyah, vol. 8, p. 291.
#IbnTaymiyyah #MinhajAlSunnah #AbuBakr #FatimahAlZahra #HouseOfFatimah #AttackOnFatimahsHouse #AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #HistoricalResearch #SourceCriticism #EarlyIslamicHistory #AhlulBaytHistory #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2723
🆔 @rahyafte_en
Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
🔷 Abū Bakr’s Alleged Regret Concerning Fāṭimah’s House A Controversial Report from the Final Hours of His Life One of the most striking reports concerning the events after the death of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ appears in accounts describing Abū Bakr’s final…
And that alone makes this one of the most important reports to investigate when studying the events surrounding the succession after the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.
The truth does not become false because it is uncomfortable.
And historical research does not become sectarian simply because it asks difficult questions.
📚 Tārīkh al-Ṭabarī; al-ʿIqd al-Farīd; Tārīkh Madīnat Dimashq.
#AbuBakr #FatimahAlZahra #HouseOfFatimah #Saqifah #EarlyIslamicHistory #IslamicHistory #AhlulBayt #HistoricalResearch #HistoryOfIslam #UmarIbnAlKhattab #UthmanIbnAffan #HistoricalSources #AhlulBaytHistory #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2724
🆔 @rahyafte_en
The truth does not become false because it is uncomfortable.
And historical research does not become sectarian simply because it asks difficult questions.
📚 Tārīkh al-Ṭabarī; al-ʿIqd al-Farīd; Tārīkh Madīnat Dimashq.
#AbuBakr #FatimahAlZahra #HouseOfFatimah #Saqifah #EarlyIslamicHistory #IslamicHistory #AhlulBayt #HistoricalResearch #HistoryOfIslam #UmarIbnAlKhattab #UthmanIbnAffan #HistoricalSources #AhlulBaytHistory #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2724
🆔 @rahyafte_en
It should be answered by returning to the earliest sources, reading them carefully, and allowing the historical evidence to speak.
The standard applied to the Prophet ﷺ must not become weaker than the standard applied to those who came after him.
#RazziyyatAlKhamis #CalamityOfThursday #ProphetMuhammad #AbuBakr #UmarIbnAlKhattab #FinalTestament #SahihBukhari #SahihMuslim #Saqifah #IslamicHistory #EarlyIslamicHistory #AhlulBayt #HistoricalResearch #HistoryOfIslam #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2725
🆔 @rahyafte_en
The standard applied to the Prophet ﷺ must not become weaker than the standard applied to those who came after him.
#RazziyyatAlKhamis #CalamityOfThursday #ProphetMuhammad #AbuBakr #UmarIbnAlKhattab #FinalTestament #SahihBukhari #SahihMuslim #Saqifah #IslamicHistory #EarlyIslamicHistory #AhlulBayt #HistoricalResearch #HistoryOfIslam #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2725
🆔 @rahyafte_en
Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
🔷 Examples of Censorship and Alteration in Historical Sources How Can We Detect Changes in the Historical Record? When studying the final days of Abū Bakr, we previously examined reports attributed to ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn ʿAwf, according to which Abū Bakr…
A later version is not automatically more reliable merely because it is easier to read or more favorable to a particular narrative.
🔸 The Historian's Responsibility
When we encounter conflicting versions, the correct response is not:
“This proves a conspiracy.”
Nor is it:
“There is nothing to investigate.”
The correct response is:
Find the earliest available version.
Compare every surviving transmission.
Identify what was added.
Identify what disappeared.
Examine the chains of transmission.
Check manuscript and edition differences.
Then determine which reading has the strongest historical basis.
This is the essence of historical source criticism.
And it becomes especially important when the subject concerns the political legitimacy of the earliest Islamic governments.
Because when an event has implications for legitimacy, succession, and the relationship between the ruling authorities and the household of the Prophet ﷺ, the possibility of selective transmission must be taken seriously—but also demonstrated, not merely asserted.
🔻 One Final Point
If a report appears in an early source, and a later source preserves the same report but removes its most sensitive sentence, the disappearance itself becomes a historical question.
The historian should ask:
That is how we move beyond inherited narratives.
History is not understood by repeating the latest version.
It is understood by tracing the history of the text itself.
#HistoricalCensorship #SourceCriticism #AbuBakr #FatimahAlZahra #HouseOfFatimah #IslamicHistory #EarlyIslamicHistory #AhlulBayt #HistoricalSources #HistoryOfIslam #Saqifah #Kallalah #ManuscriptStudies #TextualCriticism #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2726
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔸 The Historian's Responsibility
When we encounter conflicting versions, the correct response is not:
“This proves a conspiracy.”
Nor is it:
“There is nothing to investigate.”
The correct response is:
Find the earliest available version.
Compare every surviving transmission.
Identify what was added.
Identify what disappeared.
Examine the chains of transmission.
Check manuscript and edition differences.
Then determine which reading has the strongest historical basis.
This is the essence of historical source criticism.
And it becomes especially important when the subject concerns the political legitimacy of the earliest Islamic governments.
Because when an event has implications for legitimacy, succession, and the relationship between the ruling authorities and the household of the Prophet ﷺ, the possibility of selective transmission must be taken seriously—but also demonstrated, not merely asserted.
🔻 One Final Point
If a report appears in an early source, and a later source preserves the same report but removes its most sensitive sentence, the disappearance itself becomes a historical question.
The historian should ask:
What did the earliest form say?
When did the wording change?
Who transmitted the altered version?
And what historical context might explain the change?
That is how we move beyond inherited narratives.
History is not understood by repeating the latest version.
It is understood by tracing the history of the text itself.
#HistoricalCensorship #SourceCriticism #AbuBakr #FatimahAlZahra #HouseOfFatimah #IslamicHistory #EarlyIslamicHistory #AhlulBayt #HistoricalSources #HistoryOfIslam #Saqifah #Kallalah #ManuscriptStudies #TextualCriticism #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2726
🆔 @rahyafte_en
Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
🔷 Saqīfah and the Killing of a Child When Historical Events Are Measured Against the Prophet’s Own Moral Standards To understand the events surrounding Saqīfah and what followed, we must begin with a basic question: What did the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ teach…
🔻 History Must Be Judged by Its Own Standards
This is why the discussion surrounding the house of Fāṭimah cannot be reduced to a simple argument over political allegiance.
The deeper question is:
Did the actions attributed to the actors of that period conform to the moral and religious standards taught by the Prophet ﷺ?
If the answer is no, then the historian must explain the contradiction.
And if someone rejects the reports concerning physical violence or the loss of al-Muḥassin, then the correct approach is not merely to dismiss them.
Examine the sources.
Examine the chains.
Compare the versions.
Determine what is early and what is late.
Separate established facts from disputed details.
That is how history should be studied.
Not through blind loyalty.
Not through blind hatred.
But through evidence, context, and moral consistency.
🔻 One Final Question
The Prophet ﷺ spent his life teaching mercy toward the weak.
He prohibited the killing of women and children.
He condemned the killing of infants.
He taught his followers to respect human dignity.
So when we study what happened immediately after his death, we should ask one simple question:
That question deserves an honest historical investigation.
Because Saqīfah was not merely about who would govern.
It was also about what happened to the Prophet's family when political power was being established.
And the house of Fāṭimah remains one of the most painful and consequential questions in the history of early Islam.
#Saqifah #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #HouseOfFatimah #AlMuhassin #EarlyIslamicHistory #IslamicHistory #ProphetMuhammad #HistoryOfIslam #HistoricalResearch #SourceCriticism #AhlulBaytHistory #Justice #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2727
🆔 @rahyafte_en
This is why the discussion surrounding the house of Fāṭimah cannot be reduced to a simple argument over political allegiance.
The deeper question is:
Did the actions attributed to the actors of that period conform to the moral and religious standards taught by the Prophet ﷺ?
If the answer is no, then the historian must explain the contradiction.
And if someone rejects the reports concerning physical violence or the loss of al-Muḥassin, then the correct approach is not merely to dismiss them.
Examine the sources.
Examine the chains.
Compare the versions.
Determine what is early and what is late.
Separate established facts from disputed details.
That is how history should be studied.
Not through blind loyalty.
Not through blind hatred.
But through evidence, context, and moral consistency.
🔻 One Final Question
The Prophet ﷺ spent his life teaching mercy toward the weak.
He prohibited the killing of women and children.
He condemned the killing of infants.
He taught his followers to respect human dignity.
So when we study what happened immediately after his death, we should ask one simple question:
If the reports of violence against Fāṭimah's household are true, how can those actions be reconciled with the moral legacy of the Prophet ﷺ?
That question deserves an honest historical investigation.
Because Saqīfah was not merely about who would govern.
It was also about what happened to the Prophet's family when political power was being established.
And the house of Fāṭimah remains one of the most painful and consequential questions in the history of early Islam.
#Saqifah #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #HouseOfFatimah #AlMuhassin #EarlyIslamicHistory #IslamicHistory #ProphetMuhammad #HistoryOfIslam #HistoricalResearch #SourceCriticism #AhlulBaytHistory #Justice #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2727
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔷 What Does “Thirty Years of Hadith Prohibition” Mean?
[An Image of a Catastrophe in Islam]
🔸 How severe was the censorship?
Consider a government whose legitimacy was built upon a particular historical event. If the truth of that event were exposed, the very basis of its legitimacy would be called into question.
So how could such a government allow that event to be accurately transmitted to future generations?
The answer was censorship.
For approximately thirty years after the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, the transmission and recording of his sayings and traditions were subjected to severe restrictions.
Think about what that means.
🌱 Imagine a gardener planting a seed.
He waters it, nourishes it, protects it, and patiently helps it grow until the plant can stand on its own.
Now imagine that instead of nurturing it, someone steps on it and crushes it.
What happens to its growth?
It becomes distorted.
Its development is disrupted.
It no longer grows naturally.
This is how a religious tradition can be damaged when its connection to the words and teachings of its Prophet is deliberately suppressed.
🔹 For thirty years, “The Messenger of Allah said…” was not something that could simply be transmitted freely.
And then we are told:
📖 “We have the Book of Allah; that is sufficient for us.”
But does the Qur’an itself not assign the Prophet ﷺ the responsibility of explaining and clarifying revelation?
The Qur’an speaks of the Prophet teaching people the Book and wisdom.
So what happens when the Prophet’s explanations and teachings are pushed aside?
A gap is created—and someone will eventually fill it.
⚠️ And this is where another danger emerges: the infiltration of foreign narratives and Israeliyyat into Islamic interpretation.
Figures such as Ka'b al-Ahbar gained influence in the field of religious interpretation. Narratives attributed to earlier traditions began entering the process of explaining the Qur’an.
A person could simply enter the Muslim community, declare:
And then, remarkably, the next day, begin publicly interpreting the Qur’an.
📌 Whoever controls religious interpretation can profoundly influence how a generation understands its religion.
And remember:
When authentic Prophetic teachings are suppressed, the vacuum does not remain empty.
Someone else steps in.
Someone else speaks.
Someone else interprets.
Someone else becomes the “source” through which people understand their faith.
🔻 This is why understanding the history of hadith censorship is not a minor historical detail.
It is a key to understanding:
How was the memory of the Prophet preserved?
Who was allowed to transmit his words?
Who was allowed to interpret the Qur’an?
And how did foreign narratives enter Islamic thought?
The Qur’an says that the Prophet ﷺ was sent to teach and explain.
So if for decades people are prevented from saying:
“The Messenger of Allah said…”
we should seriously ask:
❓ What happens to a religion when its divinely appointed teacher is silenced?
🔷 Thirty years is not a small period of time.
Thirty years is enough to shape a generation.
And sometimes, to understand the tragedies that came later,
we must first understand what was prevented from being remembered.
#HadithProhibition #Hadith #SuppressionOfHadith #Saqifah #KaabAlAhbar #IslamicHistory #AhlulBayt #PropheticTradition #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
🔗 https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2729
🆔 @rahyafte_en
[An Image of a Catastrophe in Islam]
🔸 How severe was the censorship?
Consider a government whose legitimacy was built upon a particular historical event. If the truth of that event were exposed, the very basis of its legitimacy would be called into question.
So how could such a government allow that event to be accurately transmitted to future generations?
The answer was censorship.
For approximately thirty years after the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, the transmission and recording of his sayings and traditions were subjected to severe restrictions.
Think about what that means.
🌱 Imagine a gardener planting a seed.
He waters it, nourishes it, protects it, and patiently helps it grow until the plant can stand on its own.
Now imagine that instead of nurturing it, someone steps on it and crushes it.
What happens to its growth?
It becomes distorted.
Its development is disrupted.
It no longer grows naturally.
This is how a religious tradition can be damaged when its connection to the words and teachings of its Prophet is deliberately suppressed.
🔹 For thirty years, “The Messenger of Allah said…” was not something that could simply be transmitted freely.
And then we are told:
📖 “We have the Book of Allah; that is sufficient for us.”
But does the Qur’an itself not assign the Prophet ﷺ the responsibility of explaining and clarifying revelation?
The Qur’an speaks of the Prophet teaching people the Book and wisdom.
So what happens when the Prophet’s explanations and teachings are pushed aside?
A gap is created—and someone will eventually fill it.
⚠️ And this is where another danger emerges: the infiltration of foreign narratives and Israeliyyat into Islamic interpretation.
Figures such as Ka'b al-Ahbar gained influence in the field of religious interpretation. Narratives attributed to earlier traditions began entering the process of explaining the Qur’an.
A person could simply enter the Muslim community, declare:
“I bear witness that there is no god but Allah, and I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.”
And then, remarkably, the next day, begin publicly interpreting the Qur’an.
📌 Whoever controls religious interpretation can profoundly influence how a generation understands its religion.
And remember:
When authentic Prophetic teachings are suppressed, the vacuum does not remain empty.
Someone else steps in.
Someone else speaks.
Someone else interprets.
Someone else becomes the “source” through which people understand their faith.
🔻 This is why understanding the history of hadith censorship is not a minor historical detail.
It is a key to understanding:
How was the memory of the Prophet preserved?
Who was allowed to transmit his words?
Who was allowed to interpret the Qur’an?
And how did foreign narratives enter Islamic thought?
The Qur’an says that the Prophet ﷺ was sent to teach and explain.
So if for decades people are prevented from saying:
“The Messenger of Allah said…”
we should seriously ask:
❓ What happens to a religion when its divinely appointed teacher is silenced?
🔷 Thirty years is not a small period of time.
Thirty years is enough to shape a generation.
And sometimes, to understand the tragedies that came later,
we must first understand what was prevented from being remembered.
#HadithProhibition #Hadith #SuppressionOfHadith #Saqifah #KaabAlAhbar #IslamicHistory #AhlulBayt #PropheticTradition #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
🔗 https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2729
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔷 Examples of Historical Fabrication in the Present Day
🔸 The pain of history does not end with the events of Saqifah.
From the Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates to certain modern movements and media, efforts have continued in different forms to conceal, soften, or reinterpret the painful events of early Islamic history—particularly the reported attack on the house of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) and the loss of her unborn child.
📚 Even today, historical narratives can be presented in ways that leave out essential details.
For example, in some educational materials, the children of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ are presented merely as children who died at a young age, without adequately addressing the broader historical disputes surrounding the Prophet’s family.
🎬 And in modern television productions, historical figures such as Mu'awiyah may sometimes be portrayed through narratives that significantly differ from the accounts found in classical Islamic sources.
🔻 But why does this matter?
Because controlling the narrative of history can shape how generations understand justice, oppression, and the legacy of the Prophet ﷺ.
History tells us that during the Umayyad period, commanders such as Busr ibn Abi Artat, acting on Mu'awiyah’s orders according to historical reports, carried out brutal campaigns that included the killing of civilians and children.
These are not merely stories from a distant past.
They raise a fundamental question:
❓ What happens when the painful parts of history are systematically forgotten, softened, or removed?
When the suffering of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) is concealed,
when the events surrounding her home are dismissed or ignored,
when the historical persecution of the Ahlul Bayt (as) is minimized,
then an important part of the history of Islam disappears from public memory.
🌹 Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) was not an ordinary woman.
She was the beloved daughter of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ,
the mother of Imam al-Hasan and Imam al-Husayn (peace be upon them),
and a central figure in the household of revelation.
Yet even today, the location of her grave remains unknown.
🔹 According to traditions within Shi'a Islam, even in the era of the reappearance, the exact location of her grave will remain undisclosed.
Think about the meaning of that.
A woman who was the daughter of the Prophet ﷺ,
the mother of the leaders of the youth of Paradise,
and revered as al-Siddiqah al-Kubra—
her final resting place remains hidden.
💔 Why?
Perhaps the hidden grave itself has become a permanent historical testimony.
A silent question addressed to every generation:
🔷 The question is not merely what happened in the past.
The deeper question is:
What are we doing with the truth today?
Are we willing to study history honestly—even when it challenges the narratives we inherited?
Are we willing to distinguish between historical evidence and historical propaganda?
And most importantly:
🌱 Will we allow the suffering of the Ahlul Bayt (as) to become merely a forgotten chapter of history—or will we learn from it?
#HistoricalCensorship #LadyFatimah #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #Umayyads #Muawiyah #Saqifah #HistoricalTruth #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
🔗 https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2730
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔸 The pain of history does not end with the events of Saqifah.
From the Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates to certain modern movements and media, efforts have continued in different forms to conceal, soften, or reinterpret the painful events of early Islamic history—particularly the reported attack on the house of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) and the loss of her unborn child.
📚 Even today, historical narratives can be presented in ways that leave out essential details.
For example, in some educational materials, the children of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ are presented merely as children who died at a young age, without adequately addressing the broader historical disputes surrounding the Prophet’s family.
🎬 And in modern television productions, historical figures such as Mu'awiyah may sometimes be portrayed through narratives that significantly differ from the accounts found in classical Islamic sources.
🔻 But why does this matter?
Because controlling the narrative of history can shape how generations understand justice, oppression, and the legacy of the Prophet ﷺ.
History tells us that during the Umayyad period, commanders such as Busr ibn Abi Artat, acting on Mu'awiyah’s orders according to historical reports, carried out brutal campaigns that included the killing of civilians and children.
These are not merely stories from a distant past.
They raise a fundamental question:
❓ What happens when the painful parts of history are systematically forgotten, softened, or removed?
When the suffering of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) is concealed,
when the events surrounding her home are dismissed or ignored,
when the historical persecution of the Ahlul Bayt (as) is minimized,
then an important part of the history of Islam disappears from public memory.
🌹 Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) was not an ordinary woman.
She was the beloved daughter of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ,
the mother of Imam al-Hasan and Imam al-Husayn (peace be upon them),
and a central figure in the household of revelation.
Yet even today, the location of her grave remains unknown.
🔹 According to traditions within Shi'a Islam, even in the era of the reappearance, the exact location of her grave will remain undisclosed.
Think about the meaning of that.
A woman who was the daughter of the Prophet ﷺ,
the mother of the leaders of the youth of Paradise,
and revered as al-Siddiqah al-Kubra—
her final resting place remains hidden.
💔 Why?
Perhaps the hidden grave itself has become a permanent historical testimony.
A silent question addressed to every generation:
How could the daughter of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ suffer such oppression, while those who came after her claimed to represent his religion?
🔷 The question is not merely what happened in the past.
The deeper question is:
What are we doing with the truth today?
Are we willing to study history honestly—even when it challenges the narratives we inherited?
Are we willing to distinguish between historical evidence and historical propaganda?
And most importantly:
🌱 Will we allow the suffering of the Ahlul Bayt (as) to become merely a forgotten chapter of history—or will we learn from it?
#HistoricalCensorship #LadyFatimah #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #Umayyads #Muawiyah #Saqifah #HistoricalTruth #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
🔗 https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2730
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔷 Two Balls in Football and a Rooster Laying Eggs!
[Don’t Even Mention the Evidence of the Burning of the House of Revelation…]
🔸 Explaining historical facts to someone who has replaced thinking with blind partisanship is like arguing with a person who watches a football match for fifteen minutes and then insists:
“Why doesn’t each team have its own ball?” ⚽⚽
You explain the rules.
You explain the game.
You give him one reason after another.
But he keeps inventing new arguments to defend an idea that makes absolutely no sense.
Now imagine trying to discuss one of the most painful controversies in early Islamic history: the reported attack and burning of the house of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa).
You present evidence.
📚 You cite historical sources.
📖 You bring reports from Sunni sources themselves.
🔎 You present chains of transmission and historical accounts.
And yet, some people will still reject everything—not because there is no evidence, but because they have already decided that they do not want to accept the conclusion.
It becomes an endless cycle:
You provide one source →
they demand another.
You provide ten →
they question all ten.
You provide dozens →
they simply move the goalposts again.
At some point, you have to ask:
Are we actually discussing evidence—or are we simply refusing to think?
⚠️ There is an old saying:
The problem is not always a lack of evidence.
Sometimes the problem is the refusal to accept evidence.
🔻 Over the centuries, countless books were lost, destroyed, or suppressed. Scholars and historical figures were attacked, marginalized, or discredited simply because they transmitted accounts that challenged powerful narratives.
And yet, despite all of this:
☀️ Truth does not disappear simply because someone refuses to look at it.
The question surrounding the house of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) is therefore not something that can be dismissed with a simple:
“There is no evidence.”
The serious question is:
📌 Have you actually examined the historical evidence?
Have you looked at the sources?
Have you examined what was transmitted in the earliest records?
Have you compared different accounts?
Have you considered what even prominent historical figures and sources attributed to the events?
Because when evidence is repeatedly presented from sources that you yourself consider authoritative, simply rejecting everything because it conflicts with an inherited narrative is not scholarship.
It is partisanship.
🔷 History deserves investigation—not blind loyalty.
And when it comes to the suffering and oppression of Ahlul Bayt (peace be upon them), we should have the courage to ask uncomfortable questions, examine the evidence, and follow the truth wherever it leads.
Because…
⚽ A football match needs one ball.
🐓 A rooster does not lay eggs.
📚 And historical claims require evidence—not endless excuses.
☀️ Truth may be hidden behind clouds for a time, but it does not cease to be the sun.
#HistoricalTruth #HistoricalCensorship #HouseOfFatimah #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #Saqifah #HistoricalEvidence #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
🔗 https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2731
🆔 @rahyafte_en
[Don’t Even Mention the Evidence of the Burning of the House of Revelation…]
🔸 Explaining historical facts to someone who has replaced thinking with blind partisanship is like arguing with a person who watches a football match for fifteen minutes and then insists:
“Why doesn’t each team have its own ball?” ⚽⚽
You explain the rules.
You explain the game.
You give him one reason after another.
But he keeps inventing new arguments to defend an idea that makes absolutely no sense.
Now imagine trying to discuss one of the most painful controversies in early Islamic history: the reported attack and burning of the house of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa).
You present evidence.
📚 You cite historical sources.
📖 You bring reports from Sunni sources themselves.
🔎 You present chains of transmission and historical accounts.
And yet, some people will still reject everything—not because there is no evidence, but because they have already decided that they do not want to accept the conclusion.
It becomes an endless cycle:
You provide one source →
they demand another.
You provide ten →
they question all ten.
You provide dozens →
they simply move the goalposts again.
At some point, you have to ask:
Are we actually discussing evidence—or are we simply refusing to think?
⚠️ There is an old saying:
“You can give a thousand arguments that a rooster cannot lay eggs, but someone determined to believe otherwise will keep asking for another proof.” 🐓🥚
The problem is not always a lack of evidence.
Sometimes the problem is the refusal to accept evidence.
🔻 Over the centuries, countless books were lost, destroyed, or suppressed. Scholars and historical figures were attacked, marginalized, or discredited simply because they transmitted accounts that challenged powerful narratives.
And yet, despite all of this:
☀️ Truth does not disappear simply because someone refuses to look at it.
The question surrounding the house of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) is therefore not something that can be dismissed with a simple:
“There is no evidence.”
The serious question is:
📌 Have you actually examined the historical evidence?
Have you looked at the sources?
Have you examined what was transmitted in the earliest records?
Have you compared different accounts?
Have you considered what even prominent historical figures and sources attributed to the events?
Because when evidence is repeatedly presented from sources that you yourself consider authoritative, simply rejecting everything because it conflicts with an inherited narrative is not scholarship.
It is partisanship.
🔷 History deserves investigation—not blind loyalty.
And when it comes to the suffering and oppression of Ahlul Bayt (peace be upon them), we should have the courage to ask uncomfortable questions, examine the evidence, and follow the truth wherever it leads.
Because…
⚽ A football match needs one ball.
🐓 A rooster does not lay eggs.
📚 And historical claims require evidence—not endless excuses.
☀️ Truth may be hidden behind clouds for a time, but it does not cease to be the sun.
#HistoricalTruth #HistoricalCensorship #HouseOfFatimah #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #Saqifah #HistoricalEvidence #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
🔗 https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2731
🆔 @rahyafte_en
Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
🔷 From Self-Censorship to the Destruction of Sunni Hadith Scholars 🔸 Even within major Sunni historical and biographical sources, despite centuries of attempts to suppress uncomfortable accounts, traces of historical reports sometimes emerge from the very…
Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
🔷 THE WRITING OF THE PROPHET’S SĪRAH: DELETION, EDITING & CENSORSHIP ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔸 Was the history of the Prophet ﷺ simply preserved — or selectively transmitted? The censorship of Islamic history did not necessarily stop at the restriction of hadith.…
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🔷 So before declaring a historical narrative “settled,” ask one question:
WHO DECIDED WHAT WE WERE ALLOWED TO READ?
#Sīrah
#IbnIshaq
#IbnHisham
#IslamicHistory
#HistoricalCriticism
#HadithStudies
#HistoryOfIslam
#AhlulBayt
#FāṭimahAlZahrā
#PropheticBiography
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2740
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔷 So before declaring a historical narrative “settled,” ask one question:
WHO DECIDED WHAT WE WERE ALLOWED TO READ?
#Sīrah
#IbnIshaq
#IbnHisham
#IslamicHistory
#HistoricalCriticism
#HadithStudies
#HistoryOfIslam
#AhlulBayt
#FāṭimahAlZahrā
#PropheticBiography
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2740
🆔 @rahyafte_en
Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
🔷 ANOTHER CASE OF DELETION & CENSORSHIP: THE EVENTS OF SAQĪFA ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔸 What happens when the sources themselves disappear? The problem of early Islamic historiography is not limited to the transmission of hadith. A much bigger question concerns…
Some reports connect the Ridda conflicts not simply with rejection of Islam, but with refusal to accept the political authority established after the Prophet’s death, refusal to pay certain obligations, or disputes over allegiance.
Therefore, historians must ask:
❓ Who was actually considered a “rebel”?
❓ Who was called an “apostate”?
❓ Was every such designation purely theological — or could political considerations also have played a role?
These are not questions to be answered by slogans.
They require source criticism.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🟢 The real lesson is methodological.
When early books disappear, we should not automatically conclude:
❌ “The event never happened.”
But neither should we conclude:
❌ “Every surviving quotation must be authentic.”
Instead:
✅ Examine the earliest surviving references.
✅ Trace quotations back to their alleged sources.
✅ Compare Sunni and Shiʿi transmissions.
✅ Study the isnāds.
✅ Examine the political context.
✅ Distinguish lost sources from fabricated reports.
✅ Ask why certain narratives survived while others disappeared.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🔷 History is not only about the books we possess.
It is also about the books we lost.
And sometimes, the most important historical question is not:
but:
“What happened to the evidence that once existed?”
📌 When the original books disappear, fragments become witnesses.
#Saqifah #IslamicHistory #HistoricalCriticism #FāṭimahAlZahrā #ImamAli #IbnAlKalbi #HishamAlKalbi #AbanIbnUthman #Ridda #HistoryOfIslam #LostBooks #AhlulBayt
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2741
🆔 @rahyafte_en
Therefore, historians must ask:
❓ Who was actually considered a “rebel”?
❓ Who was called an “apostate”?
❓ Was every such designation purely theological — or could political considerations also have played a role?
These are not questions to be answered by slogans.
They require source criticism.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🟢 The real lesson is methodological.
When early books disappear, we should not automatically conclude:
❌ “The event never happened.”
But neither should we conclude:
❌ “Every surviving quotation must be authentic.”
Instead:
✅ Examine the earliest surviving references.
✅ Trace quotations back to their alleged sources.
✅ Compare Sunni and Shiʿi transmissions.
✅ Study the isnāds.
✅ Examine the political context.
✅ Distinguish lost sources from fabricated reports.
✅ Ask why certain narratives survived while others disappeared.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🔷 History is not only about the books we possess.
It is also about the books we lost.
And sometimes, the most important historical question is not:
“Where is the evidence?”
but:
“What happened to the evidence that once existed?”
📌 When the original books disappear, fragments become witnesses.
#Saqifah #IslamicHistory #HistoricalCriticism #FāṭimahAlZahrā #ImamAli #IbnAlKalbi #HishamAlKalbi #AbanIbnUthman #Ridda #HistoryOfIslam #LostBooks #AhlulBayt
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2741
🆔 @rahyafte_en