🔷 Two Balls in Football and a Rooster Laying Eggs!
[Don’t Even Mention the Evidence of the Burning of the House of Revelation…]

🔸 Explaining historical facts to someone who has replaced thinking with blind partisanship is like arguing with a person who watches a football match for fifteen minutes and then insists:

“Why doesn’t each team have its own ball?” ⚽⚽

You explain the rules.
You explain the game.
You give him one reason after another.

But he keeps inventing new arguments to defend an idea that makes absolutely no sense.

Now imagine trying to discuss one of the most painful controversies in early Islamic history: the reported attack and burning of the house of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa).

You present evidence.
📚 You cite historical sources.
📖 You bring reports from Sunni sources themselves.
🔎 You present chains of transmission and historical accounts.

And yet, some people will still reject everything—not because there is no evidence, but because they have already decided that they do not want to accept the conclusion.

It becomes an endless cycle:

You provide one source →
they demand another.

You provide ten →
they question all ten.

You provide dozens →
they simply move the goalposts again.

At some point, you have to ask:

Are we actually discussing evidence—or are we simply refusing to think?

⚠️ There is an old saying:

“You can give a thousand arguments that a rooster cannot lay eggs, but someone determined to believe otherwise will keep asking for another proof.” 🐓🥚

The problem is not always a lack of evidence.

Sometimes the problem is the refusal to accept evidence.

🔻 Over the centuries, countless books were lost, destroyed, or suppressed. Scholars and historical figures were attacked, marginalized, or discredited simply because they transmitted accounts that challenged powerful narratives.

And yet, despite all of this:

☀️ Truth does not disappear simply because someone refuses to look at it.

The question surrounding the house of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) is therefore not something that can be dismissed with a simple:

“There is no evidence.”

The serious question is:

📌 Have you actually examined the historical evidence?

Have you looked at the sources?
Have you examined what was transmitted in the earliest records?
Have you compared different accounts?
Have you considered what even prominent historical figures and sources attributed to the events?

Because when evidence is repeatedly presented from sources that you yourself consider authoritative, simply rejecting everything because it conflicts with an inherited narrative is not scholarship.

It is partisanship.

🔷 History deserves investigation—not blind loyalty.

And when it comes to the suffering and oppression of Ahlul Bayt (peace be upon them), we should have the courage to ask uncomfortable questions, examine the evidence, and follow the truth wherever it leads.

Because…

⚽ A football match needs one ball.
🐓 A rooster does not lay eggs.
📚 And historical claims require evidence—not endless excuses.

☀️ Truth may be hidden behind clouds for a time, but it does not cease to be the sun.

#HistoricalTruth #HistoricalCensorship #HouseOfFatimah #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #Saqifah #HistoricalEvidence #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia

🔗 https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2731

🆔 @rahyafte_en