🔴 The Verse of Dhul-Qurba and Banu Umayyah?
✍️ By: Mostafa Amiri
1️⃣ In discussing the Verse of Dhul-Qurba, the criterion is Banu Hashim. If Banu Umayyah were also among the Prophet's close kin, why were they excluded from the ruling of this verse? And why did Uthman object to its exclusive application to Banu Hashim?
2️⃣ Why did Muawiyah insist multiple times, according to historical records, that Dhakwan (a Jewish adoptee of Umayya) was his biological son, while he had no hesitation in affiliating Ziyad ibn Abihi as his brother?
3️⃣ Why do the Ahl al-Bayt explicitly confirm the Jewish origins and adopted status of Walid and Uqbah, but regarding Muawiyah and Abu Sufyan, there are only implicit references rather than direct statements?
4️⃣ The reason: Muawiyah had to be presented as a Qurayshi, because according to hadiths from both Sunni and Shia sources, all caliphs after the Prophet had to be from Quraysh.
5️⃣ It has also been recorded that Abi al-As, the ancestor of Uthman, the Third Caliph, and another son of Umayya, was not an Arab but of Roman origin. Uthman’s ancestors were Roman slaves from Sepphoris, not Arabs:
📜 "The sons of Abi al-As were foreigners from the people of Sepphoris."
(Tabari, Tarikh al-Tabari, Vol. 5, p. 157)
#IslamicHistory #BanuUmayyah #DhulQurba #Quraysh #BanuHashim #Tabari #NahjAlBalagha #Muawiyah #Uthman
https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/32476
🌐 @rahyafte_en
✍️ By: Mostafa Amiri
1️⃣ In discussing the Verse of Dhul-Qurba, the criterion is Banu Hashim. If Banu Umayyah were also among the Prophet's close kin, why were they excluded from the ruling of this verse? And why did Uthman object to its exclusive application to Banu Hashim?
2️⃣ Why did Muawiyah insist multiple times, according to historical records, that Dhakwan (a Jewish adoptee of Umayya) was his biological son, while he had no hesitation in affiliating Ziyad ibn Abihi as his brother?
3️⃣ Why do the Ahl al-Bayt explicitly confirm the Jewish origins and adopted status of Walid and Uqbah, but regarding Muawiyah and Abu Sufyan, there are only implicit references rather than direct statements?
4️⃣ The reason: Muawiyah had to be presented as a Qurayshi, because according to hadiths from both Sunni and Shia sources, all caliphs after the Prophet had to be from Quraysh.
5️⃣ It has also been recorded that Abi al-As, the ancestor of Uthman, the Third Caliph, and another son of Umayya, was not an Arab but of Roman origin. Uthman’s ancestors were Roman slaves from Sepphoris, not Arabs:
📜 "The sons of Abi al-As were foreigners from the people of Sepphoris."
(Tabari, Tarikh al-Tabari, Vol. 5, p. 157)
#IslamicHistory #BanuUmayyah #DhulQurba #Quraysh #BanuHashim #Tabari #NahjAlBalagha #Muawiyah #Uthman
https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/32476
🌐 @rahyafte_en
🔴 Were All the Children of Abu Sufyan of Jewish Descent?
✍️ By: Mostafa Amiri
1️⃣ Abu al-As and Dhakwan (Abu Amr), the two brothers of Abu Sufyan, were explicitly mentioned as being from Sepphoris and of Roman origin.
2️⃣ If one argues that Umayya, Abu Sufyan’s grandfather, had only one wife, then how is it that among Umayya’s four sons, only Harb (Abu Sufyan’s father) remained unquestioned, while historical records state that Abu al-As and Dhakwan were not of Qurayshi descent?
3️⃣ The reason: There was a deliberate effort to present Uthman and Muawiyah as Qurayshi, because according to both Sunni and Shia hadiths, the Prophet’s successors had to be from Quraysh.
4️⃣ More importantly, Umayya (Muawiyah’s ancestor and Abu Sufyan’s grandfather) was not Arab or Qurayshi at all, but Roman—which renders these debates secondary.
🔹 The idea that Banu Umayyah were not Arabs has been discussed since the 4th century AH among Shi’a scholars. It is not a new topic.
#IslamicHistory #BanuUmayyah #AbuSufyan #Muawiyah #Uthman #Quraysh #Sepphoris #ArabLineage
https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/32477
🌐 @rahyafte_em
✍️ By: Mostafa Amiri
1️⃣ Abu al-As and Dhakwan (Abu Amr), the two brothers of Abu Sufyan, were explicitly mentioned as being from Sepphoris and of Roman origin.
2️⃣ If one argues that Umayya, Abu Sufyan’s grandfather, had only one wife, then how is it that among Umayya’s four sons, only Harb (Abu Sufyan’s father) remained unquestioned, while historical records state that Abu al-As and Dhakwan were not of Qurayshi descent?
3️⃣ The reason: There was a deliberate effort to present Uthman and Muawiyah as Qurayshi, because according to both Sunni and Shia hadiths, the Prophet’s successors had to be from Quraysh.
4️⃣ More importantly, Umayya (Muawiyah’s ancestor and Abu Sufyan’s grandfather) was not Arab or Qurayshi at all, but Roman—which renders these debates secondary.
🔹 The idea that Banu Umayyah were not Arabs has been discussed since the 4th century AH among Shi’a scholars. It is not a new topic.
#IslamicHistory #BanuUmayyah #AbuSufyan #Muawiyah #Uthman #Quraysh #Sepphoris #ArabLineage
https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/32477
🌐 @rahyafte_em
🔴 Sufyani Has Roman Ancestry
✍️ By: Mostafa Amiri
1️⃣ Umayya, as Allameh Majlisi states, was a Roman slave who was later adopted by Shams. Through this adoption, Banu Umayyah falsely claimed kinship with the Prophet.
2️⃣ Umayya’s mother was Jewish.
3️⃣ Umayya committed adultery with a married Jewish woman, resulting in the birth of Dhakwan, whom he later claimed as his son and renamed Abu Amr.
4️⃣ Umayya had several children, including:
Dhakwan
Harb (father of Abu Sufyan)
Abi al-As (grandfather of Uthman and Marwan)
5️⃣ As a result, Abu Sufyan, Muawiyah, and Yazid were of Roman origin and not Qurayshi. As Imam Ali stated in Nahj al-Balagha, they were merely "attached" (Lasiq) to Quraysh.
6️⃣ Therefore, Sufyani, being a descendant of Muawiyah ibn Abu Sufyan, is undoubtedly of Roman descent.
#IslamicHistory #BanuUmayyah #Sufyani #Quraysh #Muawiyah #NahjAlBalagha #RomanLineage
https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/32478
🌐 @rahyafte_en
✍️ By: Mostafa Amiri
1️⃣ Umayya, as Allameh Majlisi states, was a Roman slave who was later adopted by Shams. Through this adoption, Banu Umayyah falsely claimed kinship with the Prophet.
2️⃣ Umayya’s mother was Jewish.
3️⃣ Umayya committed adultery with a married Jewish woman, resulting in the birth of Dhakwan, whom he later claimed as his son and renamed Abu Amr.
4️⃣ Umayya had several children, including:
Dhakwan
Harb (father of Abu Sufyan)
Abi al-As (grandfather of Uthman and Marwan)
5️⃣ As a result, Abu Sufyan, Muawiyah, and Yazid were of Roman origin and not Qurayshi. As Imam Ali stated in Nahj al-Balagha, they were merely "attached" (Lasiq) to Quraysh.
6️⃣ Therefore, Sufyani, being a descendant of Muawiyah ibn Abu Sufyan, is undoubtedly of Roman descent.
#IslamicHistory #BanuUmayyah #Sufyani #Quraysh #Muawiyah #NahjAlBalagha #RomanLineage
https://t.me/Monji_EmamMahdi/32478
🌐 @rahyafte_en
Telegram
مصطفی امیری in اخبار عصر ظهور | AkhbarZohuor
🔴 سفیانی، اصالت رومی دارد
✍️ مصطفی امیری
1. امیه که علامه مجلسی میفرماید: برده رومی بوده که بعدها فرزندخوانده شمس شد و از این طریق بنی امیه خود را خویشاوند پیامبر معرفی میکردند.
2. مادر امیه هم یهودی بوده است.
3. خود امیه هم با زن شوهردار یهودی، زنا کرد…
✍️ مصطفی امیری
1. امیه که علامه مجلسی میفرماید: برده رومی بوده که بعدها فرزندخوانده شمس شد و از این طریق بنی امیه خود را خویشاوند پیامبر معرفی میکردند.
2. مادر امیه هم یهودی بوده است.
3. خود امیه هم با زن شوهردار یهودی، زنا کرد…
🔷 Examples of Historical Fabrication in the Present Day
🔸 The pain of history does not end with the events of Saqifah.
From the Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates to certain modern movements and media, efforts have continued in different forms to conceal, soften, or reinterpret the painful events of early Islamic history—particularly the reported attack on the house of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) and the loss of her unborn child.
📚 Even today, historical narratives can be presented in ways that leave out essential details.
For example, in some educational materials, the children of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ are presented merely as children who died at a young age, without adequately addressing the broader historical disputes surrounding the Prophet’s family.
🎬 And in modern television productions, historical figures such as Mu'awiyah may sometimes be portrayed through narratives that significantly differ from the accounts found in classical Islamic sources.
🔻 But why does this matter?
Because controlling the narrative of history can shape how generations understand justice, oppression, and the legacy of the Prophet ﷺ.
History tells us that during the Umayyad period, commanders such as Busr ibn Abi Artat, acting on Mu'awiyah’s orders according to historical reports, carried out brutal campaigns that included the killing of civilians and children.
These are not merely stories from a distant past.
They raise a fundamental question:
❓ What happens when the painful parts of history are systematically forgotten, softened, or removed?
When the suffering of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) is concealed,
when the events surrounding her home are dismissed or ignored,
when the historical persecution of the Ahlul Bayt (as) is minimized,
then an important part of the history of Islam disappears from public memory.
🌹 Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) was not an ordinary woman.
She was the beloved daughter of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ,
the mother of Imam al-Hasan and Imam al-Husayn (peace be upon them),
and a central figure in the household of revelation.
Yet even today, the location of her grave remains unknown.
🔹 According to traditions within Shi'a Islam, even in the era of the reappearance, the exact location of her grave will remain undisclosed.
Think about the meaning of that.
A woman who was the daughter of the Prophet ﷺ,
the mother of the leaders of the youth of Paradise,
and revered as al-Siddiqah al-Kubra—
her final resting place remains hidden.
💔 Why?
Perhaps the hidden grave itself has become a permanent historical testimony.
A silent question addressed to every generation:
🔷 The question is not merely what happened in the past.
The deeper question is:
What are we doing with the truth today?
Are we willing to study history honestly—even when it challenges the narratives we inherited?
Are we willing to distinguish between historical evidence and historical propaganda?
And most importantly:
🌱 Will we allow the suffering of the Ahlul Bayt (as) to become merely a forgotten chapter of history—or will we learn from it?
#HistoricalCensorship #LadyFatimah #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #Umayyads #Muawiyah #Saqifah #HistoricalTruth #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
🔗 https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2730
🆔 @rahyafte_en
🔸 The pain of history does not end with the events of Saqifah.
From the Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates to certain modern movements and media, efforts have continued in different forms to conceal, soften, or reinterpret the painful events of early Islamic history—particularly the reported attack on the house of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) and the loss of her unborn child.
📚 Even today, historical narratives can be presented in ways that leave out essential details.
For example, in some educational materials, the children of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ are presented merely as children who died at a young age, without adequately addressing the broader historical disputes surrounding the Prophet’s family.
🎬 And in modern television productions, historical figures such as Mu'awiyah may sometimes be portrayed through narratives that significantly differ from the accounts found in classical Islamic sources.
🔻 But why does this matter?
Because controlling the narrative of history can shape how generations understand justice, oppression, and the legacy of the Prophet ﷺ.
History tells us that during the Umayyad period, commanders such as Busr ibn Abi Artat, acting on Mu'awiyah’s orders according to historical reports, carried out brutal campaigns that included the killing of civilians and children.
These are not merely stories from a distant past.
They raise a fundamental question:
❓ What happens when the painful parts of history are systematically forgotten, softened, or removed?
When the suffering of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) is concealed,
when the events surrounding her home are dismissed or ignored,
when the historical persecution of the Ahlul Bayt (as) is minimized,
then an important part of the history of Islam disappears from public memory.
🌹 Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) was not an ordinary woman.
She was the beloved daughter of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ,
the mother of Imam al-Hasan and Imam al-Husayn (peace be upon them),
and a central figure in the household of revelation.
Yet even today, the location of her grave remains unknown.
🔹 According to traditions within Shi'a Islam, even in the era of the reappearance, the exact location of her grave will remain undisclosed.
Think about the meaning of that.
A woman who was the daughter of the Prophet ﷺ,
the mother of the leaders of the youth of Paradise,
and revered as al-Siddiqah al-Kubra—
her final resting place remains hidden.
💔 Why?
Perhaps the hidden grave itself has become a permanent historical testimony.
A silent question addressed to every generation:
How could the daughter of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ suffer such oppression, while those who came after her claimed to represent his religion?
🔷 The question is not merely what happened in the past.
The deeper question is:
What are we doing with the truth today?
Are we willing to study history honestly—even when it challenges the narratives we inherited?
Are we willing to distinguish between historical evidence and historical propaganda?
And most importantly:
🌱 Will we allow the suffering of the Ahlul Bayt (as) to become merely a forgotten chapter of history—or will we learn from it?
#HistoricalCensorship #LadyFatimah #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #Umayyads #Muawiyah #Saqifah #HistoricalTruth #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia
🔗 https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2730
🆔 @rahyafte_en