Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
📆 Daily Calendar 🌺 Today: Monday 🌞 13 Mordad 1404 (Solar Hijri) ☪️ 10 Safar 1447 (Lunar Hijri) ✝️ 4 August 2025 (Gregorian) 🕎 10 Av 5785 (Hebrew) 🌍 Islamic Historical Events 1⃣ Qur'an raised on spears by the Syrians in the Battle of Siffin, a deceit by…
⚔️ The Battle of Siffin: Battleground of Jewish Infiltration
📜 A Controversial Reading of Early Islamic History
🔗 Source: Introduction to Understanding the Lineage of Deviance (Hosseinpour & Rezaei, 2022)
🔗 Full article: https://jscenter.ir/judaism-and-islam/jewish-intrigue/17899
Key Events:
1️⃣ Muawiyah’s Provocation
- When Imam Ali (ع) prepared to fight Muawiyah, the latter rallied Syrians by framing Ali as a "disturber of peace" and positioning himself as the avenger of Uthman’s murder. Syrians unanimously pledged: "We will avenge Uthman’s blood!" [1]
2️⃣ Devastating Toll
- 70,000 killed (54k Syrians, 25k Iraqis, including 25 veterans of Badr).
- 90 clashes over 100 days at Siffin. [2]
3️⃣ The "Jewish Infiltrator" Role
- Ash'ath bin Qays (alleged crypto-Jewish agent) is presented as a key saboteur who manipulated events in Muawiyah’s favor.
- Claim: Removing his influence would reveal a "radically different narrative" of Siffin.
4️⃣ Prophetic Signs Ignored
- Imam Ali’s legitimacy was marked by companions like Ammar Yasir (ع) – whom Prophet Muhammad (ص) foretold would be "killed by the transgressors" [3].
- Yet Syrians remained loyal to Muawiyah, suggesting they followed "a separate prophet named Muawiyah."
Muawiyah’s Strategic Wins:
✅ Narrative Control: Cemented Ali as "Uthman’s killer" and himself as the avenger.
✅ Testing Loyalties: Confirmed Syrian obedience and Iraqi fickleness.
✅ Scapegoating: Shifted blame for massacres to Ali and arbitration failures to Amr ibn Al-As.
✅ Eliminating Threats: Suspicious deaths (e.g., Ubaidullah ibn Umar).
The Real Culprits?
Imam Ali (ع) identified two groups that broke his back [6]:
1. Hypocritical Eloquents (منافقین): Corrupt scholars like Ash'ath who masked evil with rhetoric.
2. Ignorant Devotees (مقدسمآبان جاهل): Naive ascetics like Abu Musa Al-Ash'ari who undermined justice through misplaced piety.
⚠️ Conclusion:
- The Umayyad "tree of damnation" survived due to these infiltrators.
- "Jews had minimal direct presence because the Umayyads safeguarded all Jewish interests."
📚 Sources:
[1] Ibn Kathir, Al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya
[2] Ibn al-Jawzi, Al-Muntazam
[3] Bihar al-Anwar
[6] Al-Khisal
#BattleOfSiffin #ImamAli #UmayyadConspiracy #IslamicHistory #JewishInfluence #EarlyIslam #ReligiousPolitics
✅ @rahyafte_en
📜 A Controversial Reading of Early Islamic History
🔗 Source: Introduction to Understanding the Lineage of Deviance (Hosseinpour & Rezaei, 2022)
🔗 Full article: https://jscenter.ir/judaism-and-islam/jewish-intrigue/17899
Key Events:
1️⃣ Muawiyah’s Provocation
- When Imam Ali (ع) prepared to fight Muawiyah, the latter rallied Syrians by framing Ali as a "disturber of peace" and positioning himself as the avenger of Uthman’s murder. Syrians unanimously pledged: "We will avenge Uthman’s blood!" [1]
2️⃣ Devastating Toll
- 70,000 killed (54k Syrians, 25k Iraqis, including 25 veterans of Badr).
- 90 clashes over 100 days at Siffin. [2]
3️⃣ The "Jewish Infiltrator" Role
- Ash'ath bin Qays (alleged crypto-Jewish agent) is presented as a key saboteur who manipulated events in Muawiyah’s favor.
- Claim: Removing his influence would reveal a "radically different narrative" of Siffin.
4️⃣ Prophetic Signs Ignored
- Imam Ali’s legitimacy was marked by companions like Ammar Yasir (ع) – whom Prophet Muhammad (ص) foretold would be "killed by the transgressors" [3].
- Yet Syrians remained loyal to Muawiyah, suggesting they followed "a separate prophet named Muawiyah."
Muawiyah’s Strategic Wins:
✅ Narrative Control: Cemented Ali as "Uthman’s killer" and himself as the avenger.
✅ Testing Loyalties: Confirmed Syrian obedience and Iraqi fickleness.
✅ Scapegoating: Shifted blame for massacres to Ali and arbitration failures to Amr ibn Al-As.
✅ Eliminating Threats: Suspicious deaths (e.g., Ubaidullah ibn Umar).
The Real Culprits?
Imam Ali (ع) identified two groups that broke his back [6]:
1. Hypocritical Eloquents (منافقین): Corrupt scholars like Ash'ath who masked evil with rhetoric.
2. Ignorant Devotees (مقدسمآبان جاهل): Naive ascetics like Abu Musa Al-Ash'ari who undermined justice through misplaced piety.
⚠️ Conclusion:
- The Umayyad "tree of damnation" survived due to these infiltrators.
- "Jews had minimal direct presence because the Umayyads safeguarded all Jewish interests."
📚 Sources:
[1] Ibn Kathir, Al-Bidaya wa al-Nihaya
[2] Ibn al-Jawzi, Al-Muntazam
[3] Bihar al-Anwar
[6] Al-Khisal
#BattleOfSiffin #ImamAli #UmayyadConspiracy #IslamicHistory #JewishInfluence #EarlyIslam #ReligiousPolitics
✅ @rahyafte_en