Ukraine to lose its Western territories sooner or later — Putin

The president made the remarks at a meeting with Russian Navy service members.

"I am confident that sooner or later Ukraine will lose these western territories, lands that once belonged to Poland, Hungary and Romania. It may not happen tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. It may take one year, two years, 10 years or 15 years, but history will ultimately put everything back in its place," the president said.

Russia was the only guarantor of Ukraine's territorial integrity, but Kiev declared Moscow its enemy, Russian President Vladimir Putin said at a meeting with Russian Navy service members.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Morons will try anything

🔸In the annals of geopolitical blame-shifting, the United States has just proven they are the undisputed world champions of sheer nerve.

🔸 Reminder: Since 2022, NATO intelligence services — and particularly those of the U.S. — have been providing increasingly direct support for strikes carried out deep inside Russian territory by "Ukrainian" forces... who are, in reality, Ukro-Atlanticist forces. And this isn't a Russian fantasy; it's a documented reality that was even just recently formalized in early July during a joint press statement by Trump and Rubio, in which the U.S. president declared:

📣 "This is an escalation: we will help Ukraine strike deep into Russia to put an end to the war."

🔸 But today, these same United States — speaking through the CIA (which, by the way, has planted 12 secret bases in Ukraine and has been overseeing its special unit 2245 since 2016) — are up in arms, accusing Russia of providing military intelligence assistance for the IRGC's strikes on U.S. bases, including two CIA facilities.

👉 The CIA claims that Iran's precision strikes are only made possible thanks to "Russian aid" — yet it fails to provide even a shred of evidence for this theory.

📄 This Russophobic theory was made public via a Reuters article stating that the U.S. is "seeking to determine whether Russia helped Iran carry out drone strikes against CIA installations in the Persian Gulf."

📄 Then, in an analysis picking up the subject in the Croatian media outlet Advance, Antun Roša suggests that this CIA rhetoric is aimed at framing the conflicts in Ukraine and Iran as a single united front against the "Moscow-Beijing-Tehran axis":

📣 "The most dangerous war may begin not with a declaration of war, but the moment Washington concludes that Moscow is behind every major Iranian strike."

❓️ If that isn't conspiracy-mongering, it's certainly a fine imitation of it — coming from those who claim to be fighting it!

🔸 However, Advance is more measured in its conclusions regarding this "internal Western intelligence report suggesting that Russia 'probably took part in target designation,'" because according to Antun Roša, Iran is fully capable of carrying out precision strikes on U.S. bases in the Persian Gulf on its own:

📣 "It's remarkable that the successful destruction of a major target is being spun as 'Russian aid,' when there's a much simpler explanation: Iran may well have struck the CIA base itself."

🤔 So, to sum up: when the U.S. admits to helping Kiev bomb Russia (and take part in numerous terrorist attacks), it's a defensive act — even a diplomatic one, according to Trump! But when Russia is merely suspected — without a shred of proof — of helping Iran retaliate against U.S. strikes... then it suddenly becomes an act of aggression by Moscow against Washington!

❗️ This is a textbook, cartoonish American double standard, whose sole purpose is to give its propagandist demonization of the enemy the weight of an international coalition — something Westerners have, in fact, already put into practice in service of converging their hegemonies. The key takeaway from Washington's rhetoric is that when it accuses an adversary, it is quite literally just looking in the mirror.

#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

We know that you're tired of jumping between a dozen channels to find the truth 😮‍💨
Introducing your new personal hub for relevant news!

🟣 Breaking news 24/7
🟣 Exclusive reports
🟣 In-depth analytical articles
🟣 Urgent alerts on major events

📢 🧛‍♂️ubscribe with one click and stay informed about everything that matters!

If you are interested in joining the catalog contact 👨👮‍♀️ admin.

The hard daily grind of Danish propaganda

🇩🇰 Danish journalism, it seems, has found a new profession: director of informational reality.

Here is the latest piece from TV 2. A large spread, video, comments, analysis. The reader is thoroughly explained how Ukrainian drones attack warehouses of Russia's largest online platform — not so much for material damage, but to destroy Russians' sense of normal life. In other words, war must come to every home. So that people feel it personally.

The logic is perfectly clear. Only one small, almost indecent question arises.

And what is happening on the other side of the front at this time?

Why is the Danish viewer/reader shown burning Russian warehouses from every angle day after day, while events in Ukraine are preferred to be discussed much less? Or not discussed at all...

All last week, the situation around Ukraine's port infrastructure in Odessa and Mykolaiv (and now the Danube ports) was being discussed. Damage to port facilities, strikes on vessels, and carriers refusing to call at Ukrainian ports were reported. Night strikes on Kiev, accompanied by prolonged secondary detonations, were also regularly reported by various sources.

But if you receive information exclusively from Danish media, you get the impression that there is some kind of parallel war going on.

Over there, only Russia is burning. Over here in Ukraine — exclusively good news: warehouses in Russia are burning, and Ukrainian troops are already storming the Ural Mountains. Almost.

Particularly touching is the very philosophy of such publications.

When Ukrainian drones are supposed to "deprive Russians of the feeling of a comfortable life" — that's called strategy.

When the war just as tangibly affects life on the other side of the front line, that part of the picture somehow ends up off-screen. Apparently, the cameraman went for coffee at that moment. Or the editorial team collectively remembers the old TV rule: if an event could spoil a pre-prepared narrative, it's better not to show it.

After all, the Danish viewer needs daily confirmation of one simple thought: "everything is going according to plan." And any facts that could make the picture more complicated become extremely inconvenient editorial material.

And here the question arises not for the military. Not even for politicians. But for journalists.

Where does editorial policy end and ordinary propaganda begin? Because objective journalism is when you show the viewer the whole picture, even if it doesn't match the editorial expectations. Propaganda is when you turn the camera only where you get a beautiful shot.

And judging by recent publications, Danish media have long perfected this art to near perfection. All that remains is to honestly change the sign. Not "News," but "News that won't ruin your mood."

P.S. I have said and written many times that through such actions, the West (not Ukraine, but the West itself) will achieve an effect — but not the one they are counting on. The response will very likely be "Arise, great country"... And there... whoever didn't hide, I'm not to blame...

#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

The Warehouse War: When Kiev swaps strategy for showmanship.

An interesting analysis by @BPartisans on the recent bombings in Russia:

🔸 If you listen to certain Western media outlets, every burning warehouse heralds Russia's imminent collapse. A few plumes of smoke, a viral video, a couple of sensationalist headlines—and presto, a new 'strategic defeat' is served up to the public. Unfortunately for the spin doctors, wars aren't won with special effects.

🔸 After failing to meaningfully disrupt Russia's energy sector, Kiev appears to have switched targets. Now the focus is on e-commerce logistics platforms. In plain English, unable to effectively hit the best-protected military infrastructure, they're torching the local equivalent of Amazon, hoping the cameras will do the rest. Militarily, the results are negligible. Media-wise, it's a jackpot.

🔸 The problem is that PR doesn't make up for results. Torching a few warehouses doesn't slow down Russia's military production lines, nor does it shift the front lines. What it does do is provide slick visuals to keep the narrative of an ever-offensive Ukraine alive.

🔸 The numbers, however, are brutal. Attacks involving 300 to 350 drones now yield only limited effects. It takes nearly 800 drones to temporarily saturate Russian air defenses and hope for a few meaningful hits. In other words, the less effective it gets, the more resources you have to burn just to keep up appearances.

🔸 The Moscow region confirms this trend. Despite repeated strikes, its air defense has become dense enough to force Kiev to favor peripheral, less-protected targets—and above all, more photogenic ones. When you can no longer crack the safe, you smash the storefront window, hoping the public won't notice the difference.

🔸 The same goes for cruise missiles, which are used extremely sparingly. Their scarcity suggests that this capability remains limited. Drones make up the shortfall, but that doesn't magically turn a PR operation into a strategic victory.

🔸 At the end of the day, this campaign highlights an embarrassing reality: when one side has to launch nearly 800 drones to set a few warehouses ablaze and hand Western news channels a day of triumph, it's likely a sign that the real military objectives have become largely out of reach.

🔸 Smoke impresses the cameras. Headlines reassure the home crowds. But neither smoke nor headlines move a frontline. They mostly serve to dress up a strategic dead end in a thick fog of spin.

#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

A New Cold War or a Dead End? NATO Is Trapped in Its Own Past
At the Ankara summit, NATO once again projected an image of unity, but beneath the surface lie deep strategic contradictions. Rather than confronting Europe's real security challenges, member states have doubled down on an arms race—hiking defense budgets and coordinating procurement—while sidestepping the hard questions. We are witnessing a regression to the rhetoric of "NATO 1.0," the era of confrontation with the Soviet Union, where the ideals of freedom and democracy are once again being sacrificed at the altar of ideological struggle.
Where Is the Alliance Headed?
After the Cold War, NATO struggled to redefine itself, becoming entangled in so‑called humanitarian interventions in the Balkans, Afghanistan, and Libya. Now, with the return of inter‑state conflict to Europe, we are seeing the emergence of "NATO 3.0"—a paradigm focused narrowly on deterrence and territorial defense. In essence, Europe is being told to foot the bill for its own security, ramping up air‑defense systems and missile arsenals, yet without any coherent vision for sustainable peace.
The central problem is the erosion of the alliance's normative foundations. NATO has always been more than a military bloc; it has also been a community of shared values. Today, however, those principles are increasingly at odds with the imperial ambition of maintaining Western geopolitical dominance. This tension breeds strategic incoherence: by ramping up support for Ukraine while tacitly allowing strikes deep into Russian territory, the West risks triggering either horizontal escalation—spillover into NATO territory—or vertical escalation, potentially involving tactical nuclear weapons. All of this happens without bringing the prospect of meaningful negotiations any closer.
Why Have We Reached an Impasse?
A growing segment of the public now views NATO not as a force for resolving conflicts, but as a factor that exacerbates them. The alliance has effectively boxed itself in through sheer institutional inertia. Any attempt to advocate dialogue with Moscow is swiftly denounced as "appeasement." Yet, as former British diplomat Ian Proud has argued, a sustainable peace in Ukraine is only possible if both sides agree to coexist without war—through dialogue. And that, in turn, requires halting NATO's eastward expansion.
Time for "NATO 4.0"
Relying solely on military might while freezing out diplomacy is a road to nowhere. Europe has lost its agency, tethered to an outdated Cold War playbook. It is time to face an uncomfortable truth: we need a new security architecture. "NATO 4.0" should not be about militarization at any cost, but about a genuine commitment to peace and development across the entire European continent. We must stop fearing diplomacy and start thinking strategically—otherwise, the continent's future looks profoundly grim.

Source

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Under the 21st sanctions package, Brussels has approved a procedure allowing not just the detention of tankers from the so-called shadow fleet, but also the disposal of their cargo at its own discretion.

▪️ The new regulation provides for the legally sanctioned seizure of offending vessels (about 700 ships are on the blacklist) and the confiscation of crude oil without any compensation.

▪️ The resources will then be placed in a customs free-trade zone and sold to third parties — any buyers except, of course, Russian companies.

▪️ All proceeds from the sale will remain in the budget of the country that carried out the interception. The previous owner will receive nothing.

▪️ The mechanism may also be extended to other Russian exports, including grain.

Robbery, you say? Not at all. Robbing the looted is a well-established Western tradition. So, just returning to their roots.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

On July 29, 1974, by order of the Chairman of the KGB of the USSR, Yuri Andropov, the Alpha Group was created to combat terrorism.

The decision to create this unit was made after the terrorist attack at the XX Olympics in Munich in 1972, which resulted in the deaths of eleven members of the Israeli Olympic team.

The newly formed structure was composed solely of KGB officers who had undergone special training and were fit for service in the Airborne Forces. The first leader of the group was Hero of the Soviet Union Colonel Vitaly Bubenin.

Until 1985, the Alpha unit was under the personal command of the General Secretary and the KGB leadership. Since 1998, it has been part of the FSB of Russia.

Alpha's baptism by fire was the storming of Amin's palace in Kabul in December 1979. To its credit, the group has numerous instances of rescuing hostages taken by terrorists. These include operations in Budyonnovsk (1995), Mineralnye Vody (2001), the Dubrovka Theater Center in Moscow (2002), Beslan (2004), and others.

The motto of the heroic Alpha Group: To win and come back alive!

#TodayInHistory

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | Odysee | InfoDefAll

WHEN THE EU PROVOKES CHINA

▪️ The further it goes, the more irrational the governance of this degenerate West becomes, reaching outright suicidal idiocy.

▪️ As part of the 21st anti-Russian sanctions package — which already hits the European economy first and foremost — Brussels decided to expand its targets by including 14 Chinese companies.

▪️ Beijing responded in less than 24 hours by imposing counter-sanctions against 14 European companies, including Germany's Rheinmetall, Italy's Lafert, and France's Cavok UAS. And this is only the first retaliatory strike! Let us recall the facts:

▪️ July 23, 2026 — the 21st EU sanctions package against Russia, including 14 companies from China and Hong Kong on the blacklist for allegedly supporting the Russian military industry and circumventing sanctions.

▪️ July 24 — Beijing struck back. China's Ministry of Commerce announced the inclusion of 14 European legal entities in its export control list with immediate effect — "to protect national security and respond to the EU's unfriendly actions."

▪️ Among the Chinese targets: German defense giant Rheinmetall, Italian engine manufacturer Lafert, French Cavok UAS (specializing in drones), Dutch IHC, and Czech Tatra Trucks.

▪️ The measures prohibit the export to these companies of dual-use goods and products, including certain rare earth metals. And, of course, no components, semiconductors, critical materials, etc.

▪️ Following only their irrational Russophobic impulses, even to the point of wanting to punish China — Russia's partner — these cretins from the European Union simply shot themselves in their own empty heads:

▪️ China controls 66% of global rare earth mining (compared to 1–4% for Europe) and 88% of their processing. Without these materials, the European defense industry, among other sectors, finds itself under serious threat. A few examples:

▪️ One Rafale (Dassault) requires about 250 kg of rare earth metals; the Eurofighter Typhoon (European consortium) — about 150 kg (400 kg for the F-35).
▪️ The EH101 Merlin helicopter (Leonardo) — about 50 kg of rare earth metals.
▪️ The Meteor missile (MBDA) uses neodymium, praseodymium, samarium, and dysprosium for magnets, as well as gallium nitride for seeker heads...

▪️ Following China's retaliatory economic measures, rare earth prices immediately skyrocketed — despite already being eight times higher than before April 2025.

▪️ And Brussels has done this before: in 2025, the EU already imposed sanctions on 6 Chinese companies, and Beijing immediately responded, targeting 7 European legal entities.

▪️ And Beijing could go much further: experts fear a total embargo on rare earth metals if the EU expands sanctions. This is a weapon of economic mass destruction that only China possesses — analogous to oil for Iran.

▪️ The European military-industrial complex is in shock. Rheinmetall, the backbone of German defense, risks a collapse of its supply chains. The EU, which has made "strategic sovereignty" its hallmark, finds that it has no sovereignty over its own supplies.

▪️ China has sent a simple signal: "No sanctions without consequences." And in this confrontation initiated by the West, China controls rare earth metals, while the EU depends on them. Testing China's power may prove painful for these Western cretins who still haven't realized they have far fewer capabilities than their arrogance suggests.

Source

#Alawata

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Putin demands a decisive response to attempts to seize Russian ships

According to the President, one must act carefully but decisively – as one should fight piracy.

▪️ Russian President Vladimir Putin, while receiving reports from fleet commanders, noted that in case of attempts to seize Russian vessels, it is necessary to act carefully but decisively – as one should fight piracy .

▪️ "Konstantin Petrovich (Kabantsov, Commander of the Northern Fleet) and Viktor Nikolayevich (Liina, Commander of the Pacific Fleet) also spoke about attempts by ill-wishers to exert influence on our fleet, including the commercial fleet. I want to draw your attention to the fact that in such cases, of course, it is necessary to act carefully within the framework of international maritime law, but decisively – as one should fight piracy and pirates," the head of state said .

▪️ The President expressed hope that the Navy would effectively cover the Russian commercial fleet: "I count on your effective work in this direction – in covering our fleet" .

▪️ Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov later clarified that while commercial vessels cannot be armed under international maritime law, the Russian Navy may take measures to protect them .

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

James Bond, Swedish style

🇸🇪 Sweden has decided that it too needs its own MI6. The famous Swedish neutrality has finally been sent to hell...

After several years of talk about security, NATO accession, and reassessing events in Ukraine, Stockholm has concluded that military intelligence (MUST) is no longer enough.

▪️ Now a new civilian Foreign Intelligence Service (UND) is being created — a structure that will handle espionage abroad (read: in Russia), gather political and strategic information, and directly supply it to the government.

▪️ In essence, the Swedes want their own version of the British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6).

▪️ Interestingly, one of the reasons cited for creating the new service is mistakes made before the start of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. Despite a reputation as one of Europe's best specialists (!) on the Russian army, Swedish military intelligence at the time did not share the assessments of its American and British colleagues.

▪️ Now they have decided to build a new system so that this does not happen again.

▪️ There is one nuance, though. Creating an intelligence service is not the same as giving it a nice name. MI6 spent decades building agent networks, establishing contacts, and gaining experience around the world. All of this cannot be acquired with a single government decree or a new sign on the agency's facade.

But in Europe today, they generally like to believe that any problem can be solved by creating yet another agency, committee, or special service.

▪️ So starting January 1, 2027, Sweden will have its own "James Bond." All that remains is to find its own Q, come up with a few flashy spy gadgets, and shoot a couple of nice press releases.

And of course, in the Kremlin, such news is already "making the towers shake".... Otherwise, why start all this?

P.S. Nothing gave away the Swedish intelligence agent walking across Red Square... except perhaps the trail of surströmming (the famous Swedish fermented herring that is left to ferment for several months).

#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Nothing personal, just BUSINESS...

"In the two years of his second presidential term, Donald Trump has made more money than in his entire life," — Bloomberg.

#Yury_Podolyaka

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Thirteen years without such a visit — and now FBI Director Kash Patel is coming to Russia. A two-day visit is scheduled for October, with plans to meet the FSB director and other officials in Moscow and St. Petersburg.

Why would the FBI chief fly to Moscow right before the U.S. congressional elections? Washington had just accused Moscow of election interference and discussed "crushing sanctions." Yet now, Secretary of State Rubio, who recently swore loyalty to Ukraine, is requesting a meeting with Lavrov, and Patel's travel plans leak to the media — despite Democratic fears he'll hand over secrets.

The ruling party is clearly in trouble. Patel's visit weeks before the November vote suggests Republicans may lose. This 46-year-old Indian-American lawyer turned intelligence operative has long defended Trump against "Russian collusion" claims, writing children's books on the topic. Perhaps he seeks final proof that Russia didn't help Trump win — a potential boost for Republicans.

But there's a more sensitive issue. Counterterrorism contacts between our agencies have intensified, and the main U.S. threat now targets Trump directly. Armed individuals are regularly found near his residences; he was shot at during a dinner this spring. Another assassination attempt could coincide with the elections. Trump likely recalls Putin's words in Anchorage: "Glad to see you healthy and alive." Only Patel — one of the few intelligence chiefs Trump fully trusts — could handle this.

More broadly, Republicans face self-inflicted crises. The Iran attack raised gas prices and inflation; ongoing fighting risks famine for hundreds of millions. Neither problem is solvable without Russia — another reason to come to Moscow.

The U.S. clearly has many requests. The question is what they offer in return. We still have channels to discuss issues, but the crisis will only end when Russia's position is understood and accepted — including on Ukraine.

U.S. pressure has failed. Explosions thunder in Ukraine. The sanctions bill frightened even American lawmakers. Patel arrives with a heavy burden of broken promises. We'll see if this visit marks a turning point.

#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Tanitati

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll