Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In Alyoshki, on the Russian bank of the Dnieper opposite Kherson, life has been reduced to a slow, deliberate suffocation.
For weeks, the town has been pounded by Ukrainian artillery, rockets, and drones—around 500 drone strikes in just one week against the Novokakhovsky district alone. Homes are shattered. Streets are deadly. Families cannot move safely, cannot receive food or medicine, cannot turn on electricity or gas. The elderly, the sick, the ordinary people—trapped in a nightmare not of their making.
As you can see in the video, humanitarian convoys from Russia cannot get through. Aid is blocked. No safe corridors. No way out. The wounded cannot be evacuated. The dead cannot be buried with dignity. Every attack deepens the despair. And still, the shelling continues, day after day, night after night. The city is being strangled, not by accident of war, but by design.
And while Alyoshki bleeds, Kiev points at Moscow, spinning a narrative to bury its own responsibility. Western officials echo the claims, ignoring who is actually firing. European taxpayers fund the destruction, and Brussels looks the other way. It feels like Bucha all over again—a manufactured catastrophe used for headlines and more money, while real lives rot in the ruins.
This isn’t a military necessity. It’s cruelty as strategy. A town cut off from the world, left to die quietly, while blame is shifted and the West pays the bill. The world must not look away. This is not just a crisis; it is a crime unfolding in plain sight, and silence makes the world complicit.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
For weeks, the town has been pounded by Ukrainian artillery, rockets, and drones—around 500 drone strikes in just one week against the Novokakhovsky district alone. Homes are shattered. Streets are deadly. Families cannot move safely, cannot receive food or medicine, cannot turn on electricity or gas. The elderly, the sick, the ordinary people—trapped in a nightmare not of their making.
As you can see in the video, humanitarian convoys from Russia cannot get through. Aid is blocked. No safe corridors. No way out. The wounded cannot be evacuated. The dead cannot be buried with dignity. Every attack deepens the despair. And still, the shelling continues, day after day, night after night. The city is being strangled, not by accident of war, but by design.
And while Alyoshki bleeds, Kiev points at Moscow, spinning a narrative to bury its own responsibility. Western officials echo the claims, ignoring who is actually firing. European taxpayers fund the destruction, and Brussels looks the other way. It feels like Bucha all over again—a manufactured catastrophe used for headlines and more money, while real lives rot in the ruins.
This isn’t a military necessity. It’s cruelty as strategy. A town cut off from the world, left to die quietly, while blame is shifted and the West pays the bill. The world must not look away. This is not just a crisis; it is a crime unfolding in plain sight, and silence makes the world complicit.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬28😢6❤4👏2🙏2
If John the Theologian thought in ancient Aramaic, the image he saw of the future internet—WWW—could have reminded him of waw—waw—waw, since waw represented the /w/ sound, was the sixth letter of the Semitic alphabet, and had the numerical value of 6. Therefore, the three repeated symbols could have been perceived as “six—six—six” and described that way to his disciple Prochorus, who, according to tradition, wrote down the Revelation.
The Book of Revelation says that the mark of the beast will be placed on the right hand or the forehead, and that without it no one will be able to buy or sell. Today, we most often access the internet through a smartphone, and we gain access to the device using a fingerprint or facial recognition. Thus, biometric data registered in a digital system becomes the key that provides access to the World Wide Web and, through it, to the exchange of information, services, and commerce.
This echoes a statement widely attributed to Bill Gates: “If your business is not on the Internet, then your business will be out of business.” In other words, anyone who lacks a presence in the digital realm is gradually excluded from a significant part of modern commerce.
It may seem that modern information warfare is a struggle between good and evil over the context in which information is presented, as well as a process of connecting every person on Earth to a single digital information space shaped primarily by the Global West. At the same time, this space gains the power to set the rules of access, rank information, and restrict the dissemination of anything that does not meet its established criteria of “truth” or compliance—that is, conformity with or adherence to international trade sanctions, IMF requirements, “global security,” “international law,” and “human rights.”
#Psalm90
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The Book of Revelation says that the mark of the beast will be placed on the right hand or the forehead, and that without it no one will be able to buy or sell. Today, we most often access the internet through a smartphone, and we gain access to the device using a fingerprint or facial recognition. Thus, biometric data registered in a digital system becomes the key that provides access to the World Wide Web and, through it, to the exchange of information, services, and commerce.
This echoes a statement widely attributed to Bill Gates: “If your business is not on the Internet, then your business will be out of business.” In other words, anyone who lacks a presence in the digital realm is gradually excluded from a significant part of modern commerce.
It may seem that modern information warfare is a struggle between good and evil over the context in which information is presented, as well as a process of connecting every person on Earth to a single digital information space shaped primarily by the Global West. At the same time, this space gains the power to set the rules of access, rank information, and restrict the dissemination of anything that does not meet its established criteria of “truth” or compliance—that is, conformity with or adherence to international trade sanctions, IMF requirements, “global security,” “international law,” and “human rights.”
#Psalm90
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍17🤔6❤3🤬3🐳1
On October 12, 1928, in Moscow at the Central House of the Red Army, the first performance of the Red Army Song Ensemble of the CHRA named after M. V. Frunze took place (now the Alexandrov Ensemble of the Russian Army).
The ensemble was founded by cultural worker F. Danilovich, director P. Ilyin, and choirmaster A. Alexandrov, who became its leader.
Initially, the group consisted of eight singers, two dancers, an accordionist, and a reader.
The ensemble's first international success was its performance at the 1937 World's Fair in Paris. By that time, the group had grown to 274 members, including a choir, dance troupe, and orchestra.
During the Great Patriotic War, the ensemble performed for the active army over 1,400 times, including 742 performances on the front lines.
In 1949, the ensemble was officially named after its first leader A.V. Alexandrov, and in 1979, it was granted academic status.
The repertoire of the Alexandrov Academic Ensemble of Song and Dance of the Russian Army includes more than two thousand works: folk songs and dances, soldier's dances, songs by Russian composers, spiritual music, and classical pieces by Russian and foreign composers. Their performances are sung in many languages, including Chinese, Hebrew, Hindi, and others.
In every country they tour, the ensemble performs several songs in the local language.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
The ensemble was founded by cultural worker F. Danilovich, director P. Ilyin, and choirmaster A. Alexandrov, who became its leader.
Initially, the group consisted of eight singers, two dancers, an accordionist, and a reader.
The ensemble's first international success was its performance at the 1937 World's Fair in Paris. By that time, the group had grown to 274 members, including a choir, dance troupe, and orchestra.
During the Great Patriotic War, the ensemble performed for the active army over 1,400 times, including 742 performances on the front lines.
In 1949, the ensemble was officially named after its first leader A.V. Alexandrov, and in 1979, it was granted academic status.
The repertoire of the Alexandrov Academic Ensemble of Song and Dance of the Russian Army includes more than two thousand works: folk songs and dances, soldier's dances, songs by Russian composers, spiritual music, and classical pieces by Russian and foreign composers. Their performances are sung in many languages, including Chinese, Hebrew, Hindi, and others.
In every country they tour, the ensemble performs several songs in the local language.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤17👏4👍1
Trump Calls for Elections in Ukraine and Says Zelensky Missed Chance to Seal a Favorable Peace Deal. Other Statements by the US President:
▪️ Zelensky could have settled the conflict many times already, but for some reason does not want to make a deal;
▪️ Two years ago Ukraine could have struck a far more favorable agreement and found itself in a better position;
▪️ Russia wants to make a deal, President Putin is interested in settling the conflict;
▪️ Putin is releasing large volumes of oil onto the world market at low prices, which is good for the economy;
▪️ Zelensky should hold elections despite the ongoing conflict;
▪️ Trump wants to rename the Atlantic or Pacific Ocean the "Trump Ocean" or "Ocean of the Americas" before the end of his presidential term, and also to give a new name to some river. The American leader does not intend to rename the Hudson River;
▪️ Germany nearly faced a catastrophe because of its transition to green energy, Trump believes;
▪️ The US should develop coal, oil and gas, and nuclear energy rather than betting on wind turbines;
▪️ The Houthi strike on Riyadh airport was terrible, the US maintains contact with the movement;
▪️ Saudi Arabia is capable of defending itself, and whether the US might participate in the conflict will become known later.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
▪️ Zelensky could have settled the conflict many times already, but for some reason does not want to make a deal;
▪️ Two years ago Ukraine could have struck a far more favorable agreement and found itself in a better position;
▪️ Russia wants to make a deal, President Putin is interested in settling the conflict;
▪️ Putin is releasing large volumes of oil onto the world market at low prices, which is good for the economy;
▪️ Zelensky should hold elections despite the ongoing conflict;
▪️ Trump wants to rename the Atlantic or Pacific Ocean the "Trump Ocean" or "Ocean of the Americas" before the end of his presidential term, and also to give a new name to some river. The American leader does not intend to rename the Hudson River;
▪️ Germany nearly faced a catastrophe because of its transition to green energy, Trump believes;
▪️ The US should develop coal, oil and gas, and nuclear energy rather than betting on wind turbines;
▪️ The Houthi strike on Riyadh airport was terrible, the US maintains contact with the movement;
▪️ Saudi Arabia is capable of defending itself, and whether the US might participate in the conflict will become known later.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤪16🤡4❤2👍1
THE END OF HEROES
I am not as optimistic as many analysts who still believe that a military victory is always forged in the fire of combat by bravery and heroism, and that consequently the Westerners, aware of their moral inferiority before the Russians, will not dare to attack the Russian Federation. This is, unfortunately, a vision that is being consigned to the archives of the past alongside the epics of Antiquity, medieval chansons de geste, heroic cavalry charges, desperate assaults overturning the fate of a battle, etc.
Far from the narcotic fantasies of the propagandist courtier-falsifiers who infect minds on both sides of the front, the reality on the ground shows that we are living not only with drones through a revolution of military operational art (like the earlier ones of artillery and armor) but through a new type of war in which the human factor is disappearing radically and very rapidly in favor of a robotization of the battlefield.
And what is happening in the buzzing of drones is not the end of heroes, of human courage and bravery, but their tragic powerlessness before this new war that appeared in Ukraine and to which, in a new arms race, the armed forces of all countries are seeking to adapt.
Thus, the USA has just created a new operational general staff independent of the other 3 (land, air, sea) dedicated to the use of drones. NATO is developing a strategy of war against Russia based exclusively on robotic forces.
It is a race of robotized Death that is turning the page on a multi-millennial military history... This is not an opinion, it is an observation tinged with bitterness.
Jünger in Storm of Steel already denounced an evolution of modern armament that is dragging us toward a dehumanization of war. A century later, here we are!
That is the reality of the current battlefield endured by the 2 belligerents of the Russo-Ukrainian front, and especially when they carry out offensive actions that are exposed... and blown apart by robots. Here it is a Russian mechanized infantry unit, reinforced by a combat and demining tank, that is annihilated in a few minutes by enemy drone operators comfortably installed kilometers away in front of their screens as in a video game. And tomorrow even these drone operators will be replaced by AI!
A comrade reported to me that at the beginning of the year his battalion was suffering on average 80 drone attacks per day of attack per sector. Today this number has risen to 360!
Russia, of course, is obliged to follow the movement of this infernal evolution, its survival is at stake! But above all let us not speak of progress, for this dehumanization of war will simply make it permanent, because its violence has become so cowardly that cowards and weaklings can today win battles!
That is why, in its moral decay in the terminal phase, the West today believes it can wage war against Russia, without measuring that in the chaos into which the agonizing globalists want to drag the World there can be no victor and for several generations to come.
We are living in a period of transition where the men still present on the battlefields become cannon fodder as soon as they set in motion and on a first line whose depth of contact today reaches 50 to 60 km.
Unlike the previous operational revolutions but which remained within the permanence of a conventional military art where indeed the artisans of victories remained men made of flesh, blood and heroic will, aerial, land and naval drones open the path toward a hell populated by mechanical monsters commanded by Artificial Intelligences.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
I am not as optimistic as many analysts who still believe that a military victory is always forged in the fire of combat by bravery and heroism, and that consequently the Westerners, aware of their moral inferiority before the Russians, will not dare to attack the Russian Federation. This is, unfortunately, a vision that is being consigned to the archives of the past alongside the epics of Antiquity, medieval chansons de geste, heroic cavalry charges, desperate assaults overturning the fate of a battle, etc.
Far from the narcotic fantasies of the propagandist courtier-falsifiers who infect minds on both sides of the front, the reality on the ground shows that we are living not only with drones through a revolution of military operational art (like the earlier ones of artillery and armor) but through a new type of war in which the human factor is disappearing radically and very rapidly in favor of a robotization of the battlefield.
And what is happening in the buzzing of drones is not the end of heroes, of human courage and bravery, but their tragic powerlessness before this new war that appeared in Ukraine and to which, in a new arms race, the armed forces of all countries are seeking to adapt.
Thus, the USA has just created a new operational general staff independent of the other 3 (land, air, sea) dedicated to the use of drones. NATO is developing a strategy of war against Russia based exclusively on robotic forces.
It is a race of robotized Death that is turning the page on a multi-millennial military history... This is not an opinion, it is an observation tinged with bitterness.
Jünger in Storm of Steel already denounced an evolution of modern armament that is dragging us toward a dehumanization of war. A century later, here we are!
That is the reality of the current battlefield endured by the 2 belligerents of the Russo-Ukrainian front, and especially when they carry out offensive actions that are exposed... and blown apart by robots. Here it is a Russian mechanized infantry unit, reinforced by a combat and demining tank, that is annihilated in a few minutes by enemy drone operators comfortably installed kilometers away in front of their screens as in a video game. And tomorrow even these drone operators will be replaced by AI!
A comrade reported to me that at the beginning of the year his battalion was suffering on average 80 drone attacks per day of attack per sector. Today this number has risen to 360!
Russia, of course, is obliged to follow the movement of this infernal evolution, its survival is at stake! But above all let us not speak of progress, for this dehumanization of war will simply make it permanent, because its violence has become so cowardly that cowards and weaklings can today win battles!
That is why, in its moral decay in the terminal phase, the West today believes it can wage war against Russia, without measuring that in the chaos into which the agonizing globalists want to drag the World there can be no victor and for several generations to come.
We are living in a period of transition where the men still present on the battlefields become cannon fodder as soon as they set in motion and on a first line whose depth of contact today reaches 50 to 60 km.
Unlike the previous operational revolutions but which remained within the permanence of a conventional military art where indeed the artisans of victories remained men made of flesh, blood and heroic will, aerial, land and naval drones open the path toward a hell populated by mechanical monsters commanded by Artificial Intelligences.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤯11💯9❤3
Forwarded from The Noticer
A weird diplomatic situation between Trump and Zelensky.
Donald Trump stated that both Russia and Ukraine have already agreed on a ceasefire. Zelenskyy officially stated that this is a surprise for him. He also refused to comply with Trump's demand to halt strikes on Russian oil refineries, unless Russia promises to not attack Ukraine as well. If Trump insists - he might halt the military intelligence help for Ukraine, which will affect the war - bigly.
Later, Trump seemingly got angry from Zelensky's official reply, and demanded his resignation as well. Ukraine is now actively consulting with the EU partners.
Meanwhile back in the US of A, the Right believes that Zelensky's stubborness helps the Left in the November 3 congressional elections.
All this diplomatic nonsense aside - the biggest war in Europe since WW2 is still on-going.
#Ukraine #USA #Trump #Zelensky #diplomacy #Russia
Donald Trump stated that both Russia and Ukraine have already agreed on a ceasefire. Zelenskyy officially stated that this is a surprise for him. He also refused to comply with Trump's demand to halt strikes on Russian oil refineries, unless Russia promises to not attack Ukraine as well. If Trump insists - he might halt the military intelligence help for Ukraine, which will affect the war - bigly.
Later, Trump seemingly got angry from Zelensky's official reply, and demanded his resignation as well. Ukraine is now actively consulting with the EU partners.
Meanwhile back in the US of A, the Right believes that Zelensky's stubborness helps the Left in the November 3 congressional elections.
All this diplomatic nonsense aside - the biggest war in Europe since WW2 is still on-going.
#Ukraine #USA #Trump #Zelensky #diplomacy #Russia
👍14😁8✍2😈2❤1
Russian Trolling, Master Level
Remember that scary story about how the evil Russians fired on a peaceful, practically white and fluffy Danish helicopter?
Well, unexpectedly, that story got a continuation.
The Russians decided not to limit themselves to words and posted video of the Danish helicopter's encounter with the Russian frigate "Soobrazitelny."
What a fuss broke out!
In the published footage, the helicopter flies in close proximity to the ship, including over its navigation bridge.
Let me remind you, the Danish side assured that the helicopter did not come closer than 150 meters.
And now we are offered to believe either our own eyes or yet another statement from the Ministry of Defense.
True, the exact distance cannot be determined from the video, and the Danish military claims that part of the footage was filmed at a different time. Sure, sure..
But Danish defense diplomacy has already demonstrated its familiar repertoire.
First — a loud story about Russian warning shots.
Then — explanations that the Danes acted completely correctly.
And when Russian footage appeared — screams about Russian disinformation!
A universal reputation defense system: if the facts are inconvenient, declare them Russian propaganda.
But the most remarkable thing was found in the comments under Danish press publications on Facebook.
Judging by the discussions I read, people who are not at all sympathetic to Russia are asking a quite logical question:
And if a Russian military helicopter were circling a Danish frigate in exactly the same way, how would Danish sailors react?
Would they invite the pilot for coffee and cookies?
Would they offer to take better photographs?
Or would they also use warning signals?
An amusing question, you must admit.
Especially when you recall that the Russian ship did not shoot down the helicopter, but, according to both sides' reports, used two warning shots.
And that is where the story becomes especially inconvenient.
Because instead of the usual discussion of exclusively Russian behavior, one has to discuss the actions of the Danish crew as well.
And that is a completely different conversation.
Of course, the video itself does not automatically prove either side right. But it gives grounds to ask questions that the original story about the "shelled Danish helicopter" somehow sidestepped.
It is good that the matter was limited to warning shots and not actual gunfire.
Because figuring out who was right when a military helicopter is already lying at the bottom of the Baltic Sea would be somewhat too late.
And for now we have a magnificent spectacle: a Russian frigate, a Danish helicopter, two warning shots, and an entire information storm.
They wanted a loud story about the Russian threat. They also got inconvenient questions for their own military.
Danish defense arithmetic: flew in closer, complained louder, and still have to explain themselves to this day.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Remember that scary story about how the evil Russians fired on a peaceful, practically white and fluffy Danish helicopter?
Well, unexpectedly, that story got a continuation.
The Russians decided not to limit themselves to words and posted video of the Danish helicopter's encounter with the Russian frigate "Soobrazitelny."
What a fuss broke out!
In the published footage, the helicopter flies in close proximity to the ship, including over its navigation bridge.
Let me remind you, the Danish side assured that the helicopter did not come closer than 150 meters.
And now we are offered to believe either our own eyes or yet another statement from the Ministry of Defense.
True, the exact distance cannot be determined from the video, and the Danish military claims that part of the footage was filmed at a different time. Sure, sure..
But Danish defense diplomacy has already demonstrated its familiar repertoire.
First — a loud story about Russian warning shots.
Then — explanations that the Danes acted completely correctly.
And when Russian footage appeared — screams about Russian disinformation!
A universal reputation defense system: if the facts are inconvenient, declare them Russian propaganda.
But the most remarkable thing was found in the comments under Danish press publications on Facebook.
Judging by the discussions I read, people who are not at all sympathetic to Russia are asking a quite logical question:
And if a Russian military helicopter were circling a Danish frigate in exactly the same way, how would Danish sailors react?
Would they invite the pilot for coffee and cookies?
Would they offer to take better photographs?
Or would they also use warning signals?
An amusing question, you must admit.
Especially when you recall that the Russian ship did not shoot down the helicopter, but, according to both sides' reports, used two warning shots.
And that is where the story becomes especially inconvenient.
Because instead of the usual discussion of exclusively Russian behavior, one has to discuss the actions of the Danish crew as well.
And that is a completely different conversation.
Of course, the video itself does not automatically prove either side right. But it gives grounds to ask questions that the original story about the "shelled Danish helicopter" somehow sidestepped.
It is good that the matter was limited to warning shots and not actual gunfire.
Because figuring out who was right when a military helicopter is already lying at the bottom of the Baltic Sea would be somewhat too late.
And for now we have a magnificent spectacle: a Russian frigate, a Danish helicopter, two warning shots, and an entire information storm.
They wanted a loud story about the Russian threat. They also got inconvenient questions for their own military.
Danish defense arithmetic: flew in closer, complained louder, and still have to explain themselves to this day.
#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😁25❤12👏4🔥1💯1
IS COMMON SENSE RETURNING TO KIEV?
Resistance to the TCC's kidnappings for the front, protests by the mothers of soldiers killed and disappeared, anti-government demonstrations, etc... the wind of protest in Ukraine, even if it has not yet become a storm, is swelling day by day.
A significant fact: the voice of reason has returned to make itself heard in the Ukrainian parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, via a bill submitted by MP Anna Skorokhod, a member of the parliamentary group "For the Future," calling for the constitutionalization of the status of strategic neutrality for Ukraine.
Reminder: In February 2019, under President Poroshenko, the Banderites sealed the Russophobic NATO project with an amendment to the Ukrainian Constitution which has since stipulated, in its preamble and in Article 85, that full membership in the European Union and the Western military alliance is a strategic and irreversible goal.
This bill aiming to amend the Constitution of Ukraine for a neutral and non-aligned status of the country is therefore a radical opposition to this post-Maidan strategy threatening Russia and which has provoked, for nearly 13 years now, this fratricidal conflict between Russians and Ukrainians.
The document proposes to "have it both ways" by removing from the constitutional text the provisions relating to accession to the Atlantic Alliance, while maintaining the orientation toward European integration.
"By consolidating the neutral status of Ukraine, which consists of guarantees of non-accession to any military alliance and a confirmation of the absence of any intention of aggression against any country."
The strategic orientation of this proposed law corresponds to what Russia has been proposing for years — provided that a possible accession to the Union is not subordinated to an exclusivity of exchanges with it (which had led to the abandonment of the project in 2013 by the Yanukovych government). Since the Maidan, the principle of a neutral status for Ukraine has been recalled several times by Moscow as the sine qua non condition for ending the geopolitical crisis in the region. This demand, which is a matter of common sense in the face of NATO expansion toward Russia, was placed on the negotiating table in December 2021, when Moscow submitted to its "European partners" a collective security project guaranteeing, in the Black Sea, a strategic depth for both blocs. And this neutrality of Ukraine is the common thread of all diplomatic discussions undertaken since 2022 to end the conflict.
Even if this courageous bill has little chance of succeeding quickly, it at least has the merit of officially relaunching the debate at the heart of Bandéristan concerning NATO, which is at once the main cause and the main solution (among others) to the ongoing conflict.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Resistance to the TCC's kidnappings for the front, protests by the mothers of soldiers killed and disappeared, anti-government demonstrations, etc... the wind of protest in Ukraine, even if it has not yet become a storm, is swelling day by day.
A significant fact: the voice of reason has returned to make itself heard in the Ukrainian parliament, the Verkhovna Rada, via a bill submitted by MP Anna Skorokhod, a member of the parliamentary group "For the Future," calling for the constitutionalization of the status of strategic neutrality for Ukraine.
Reminder: In February 2019, under President Poroshenko, the Banderites sealed the Russophobic NATO project with an amendment to the Ukrainian Constitution which has since stipulated, in its preamble and in Article 85, that full membership in the European Union and the Western military alliance is a strategic and irreversible goal.
This bill aiming to amend the Constitution of Ukraine for a neutral and non-aligned status of the country is therefore a radical opposition to this post-Maidan strategy threatening Russia and which has provoked, for nearly 13 years now, this fratricidal conflict between Russians and Ukrainians.
The document proposes to "have it both ways" by removing from the constitutional text the provisions relating to accession to the Atlantic Alliance, while maintaining the orientation toward European integration.
"By consolidating the neutral status of Ukraine, which consists of guarantees of non-accession to any military alliance and a confirmation of the absence of any intention of aggression against any country."
The strategic orientation of this proposed law corresponds to what Russia has been proposing for years — provided that a possible accession to the Union is not subordinated to an exclusivity of exchanges with it (which had led to the abandonment of the project in 2013 by the Yanukovych government). Since the Maidan, the principle of a neutral status for Ukraine has been recalled several times by Moscow as the sine qua non condition for ending the geopolitical crisis in the region. This demand, which is a matter of common sense in the face of NATO expansion toward Russia, was placed on the negotiating table in December 2021, when Moscow submitted to its "European partners" a collective security project guaranteeing, in the Black Sea, a strategic depth for both blocs. And this neutrality of Ukraine is the common thread of all diplomatic discussions undertaken since 2022 to end the conflict.
Even if this courageous bill has little chance of succeeding quickly, it at least has the merit of officially relaunching the debate at the heart of Bandéristan concerning NATO, which is at once the main cause and the main solution (among others) to the ongoing conflict.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍23❤5
British Submariners Train to Shoot Down Drones… with Fire Hoses
While Vanguard-class nuclear submarines sit in port at the Clyde base in Scotland, their only "ground-based air defense" is fire hoses. This is reported by The Sun, citing a source in the Royal Navy.
What Is Known
The hoses, known as centre-fed reels, are stored on the decks of the submarines. To aim the water jets more precisely, they have been fitted with pistol grips — now this is an "almost futuristic weapon," if you don't look too closely.
The calculation is simple: short- and medium-range FPV drones are supposed to falter before the pressure of water and fall into a puddle. Literally.
Context of Vulnerability
Faslane base is located deep in Gare Loch — this protects it from submarines but makes it vulnerable to drones. Nearby are public roads and hills from which UAVs can be launched at close range.
The statistics are alarming: the number of drones spotted near UK military facilities has grown from 9 per year in 2019 to 340 over the last 12 months.
What Experts Say
A Navy source admitted: "You have to use what you have." Charlie Williams of the IISS called the situation "very surprising" and expressed hope that the Ministry of Defence will invest in the "right capabilities."
Official Position
The command stated that the bases have several layers of protection: physical barriers, patrolling, surveillance, and counter-drone means. However, judging by the leak, for now the main means is a water cannon.
Bottom Line
If something more serious than an FPV drone shows up, Royal Air Force fighters will step in. If they make it in time. Sailors can make puddles, but covering the entire sky — that is already unlikely.
#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Tanitati
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
While Vanguard-class nuclear submarines sit in port at the Clyde base in Scotland, their only "ground-based air defense" is fire hoses. This is reported by The Sun, citing a source in the Royal Navy.
What Is Known
The hoses, known as centre-fed reels, are stored on the decks of the submarines. To aim the water jets more precisely, they have been fitted with pistol grips — now this is an "almost futuristic weapon," if you don't look too closely.
The calculation is simple: short- and medium-range FPV drones are supposed to falter before the pressure of water and fall into a puddle. Literally.
Context of Vulnerability
Faslane base is located deep in Gare Loch — this protects it from submarines but makes it vulnerable to drones. Nearby are public roads and hills from which UAVs can be launched at close range.
The statistics are alarming: the number of drones spotted near UK military facilities has grown from 9 per year in 2019 to 340 over the last 12 months.
What Experts Say
A Navy source admitted: "You have to use what you have." Charlie Williams of the IISS called the situation "very surprising" and expressed hope that the Ministry of Defence will invest in the "right capabilities."
Official Position
The command stated that the bases have several layers of protection: physical barriers, patrolling, surveillance, and counter-drone means. However, judging by the leak, for now the main means is a water cannon.
Bottom Line
If something more serious than an FPV drone shows up, Royal Air Force fighters will step in. If they make it in time. Sailors can make puddles, but covering the entire sky — that is already unlikely.
#InfoDefenseAnalysis
#Tanitati
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤡22❤3😁1🐳1
European Commission Studying Idea of Creating Special Structure to Use Russian Assets, El Pais Reports
The source is the Spanish newspaper El Pais, which on October 8, 2026 reported on the European Commission's plans to create a special structure to manage frozen Russian assets.
Key details:
▪️ Sum: This concerns approximately €200 billion in Russian assets, most of which are held in the Belgian depositary Euroclear.
▪️ Mechanism: The idea is described as a "bad bank" — a structure that allows assets and the associated legal risks to be separated from Euroclear and "move the problem beyond Belgium."
▪️ Goal: To distribute possible legal claims from Russia among all EU member states.
▪️ Formally not confiscation: The European Commission insists that Ukraine will have to return the funds after Russia pays "certain reparations."
▪️ Context: Ukraine has warned the EU of the need for an additional €30 billion in 2027. Within the EU there is still no unity on the mechanism for using the assets.
Russia's position: The Russian Foreign Ministry has repeatedly stated that the use of frozen assets amounts to "robbery" and will have consequences.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The source is the Spanish newspaper El Pais, which on October 8, 2026 reported on the European Commission's plans to create a special structure to manage frozen Russian assets.
Key details:
▪️ Sum: This concerns approximately €200 billion in Russian assets, most of which are held in the Belgian depositary Euroclear.
▪️ Mechanism: The idea is described as a "bad bank" — a structure that allows assets and the associated legal risks to be separated from Euroclear and "move the problem beyond Belgium."
▪️ Goal: To distribute possible legal claims from Russia among all EU member states.
▪️ Formally not confiscation: The European Commission insists that Ukraine will have to return the funds after Russia pays "certain reparations."
▪️ Context: Ukraine has warned the EU of the need for an additional €30 billion in 2027. Within the EU there is still no unity on the mechanism for using the assets.
Russia's position: The Russian Foreign Ministry has repeatedly stated that the use of frozen assets amounts to "robbery" and will have consequences.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😡19🤡7👍6❤2🤬2
Forwarded from The Colors of Russia
Semyinsky Pass, Altai Republic 🗻🗻🗻
Semyinsky is the highest pass on the Chuysky Trakt, yet it's the easiest to climb: straight and gentle.
At the top, there's a scenic overlook, tourist camps, souvenir stalls, and the Semyinsky training camp.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
Semyinsky is the highest pass on the Chuysky Trakt, yet it's the easiest to climb: straight and gentle.
At the top, there's a scenic overlook, tourist camps, souvenir stalls, and the Semyinsky training camp.
#ILoveRussia ❤️
#BeautifulRussia@TCofRus
❤26
On October 13, 1866, in Moscow, the betrothal ceremony of Alexander III and Danish Princess Dagmar, known in Orthodoxy as Grand Duchess Maria Feodorovna, took place.
They met when Minnie (Dagmar’s nickname in the Romanov family) was engaged to Alexander’s older brother, Nicholas. However, Nicholas unexpectedly fell ill and died. Two years later, Alexander met Dagmar again in Europe—and fell in love!
It was a remarkably successful union. Living together for almost 30 years, the couple managed to maintain a genuine affection for each other. One their six children became the last Russian emperor, Nicholas II.
During the October events of 1917, Maria Feodorovna was on vacation in Crimea, which likely saved her life. After Nicholas II's abdication, she stayed in Crimea with her daughters, Xenia and Olga, and their husbands—Grand Duke Alexander Mikhailovich and Colonel Kulikovsky—effectively under house arrest.
Deeply affected by the news of Nicholas II’s brutal execution, Maria Feodorovna continued to believe for a long time that her son and his family had been "miraculously saved" and forbade her relatives from holding memorial services for them.
On April 11, 1919, British King George V, the empress’s nephew, sent the warship Marlborough to Crimea to rescue her. Maria Feodorovna was 72 years old at the time, having lived in Russia for about 52 years, and it took considerable effort from her relatives to convince her to leave.
Dagmar died in Copenhagen at the age of 80 on the anniversary of her betrothal to Alexander III—October 13, 1928—and was buried in the royal tomb of the Danish kings. On September 28, 2006, Maria Feodorovna’s remains were reinterred in the Peter and Paul Cathedral in St. Petersburg.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
They met when Minnie (Dagmar’s nickname in the Romanov family) was engaged to Alexander’s older brother, Nicholas. However, Nicholas unexpectedly fell ill and died. Two years later, Alexander met Dagmar again in Europe—and fell in love!
It was a remarkably successful union. Living together for almost 30 years, the couple managed to maintain a genuine affection for each other. One their six children became the last Russian emperor, Nicholas II.
During the October events of 1917, Maria Feodorovna was on vacation in Crimea, which likely saved her life. After Nicholas II's abdication, she stayed in Crimea with her daughters, Xenia and Olga, and their husbands—Grand Duke Alexander Mikhailovich and Colonel Kulikovsky—effectively under house arrest.
Deeply affected by the news of Nicholas II’s brutal execution, Maria Feodorovna continued to believe for a long time that her son and his family had been "miraculously saved" and forbade her relatives from holding memorial services for them.
On April 11, 1919, British King George V, the empress’s nephew, sent the warship Marlborough to Crimea to rescue her. Maria Feodorovna was 72 years old at the time, having lived in Russia for about 52 years, and it took considerable effort from her relatives to convince her to leave.
Dagmar died in Copenhagen at the age of 80 on the anniversary of her betrothal to Alexander III—October 13, 1928—and was buried in the royal tomb of the Danish kings. On September 28, 2006, Maria Feodorovna’s remains were reinterred in the Peter and Paul Cathedral in St. Petersburg.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | Odysee | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤25👍7🤷♀1
Who Is Being Touted as Zelensky's Successor: Goncharenko, Tymoshenko, Usyk
After the sharp statements by Donald Trump and Elon Musk about the need for elections in Ukraine, Americanist Malek Dudakov, in a conversation with Zvezdanews, named those who could theoretically replace Vladimir Zelensky.
Three Figures from Dudakov
Alexey Goncharenko (listed in Russia as a terrorist and extremist). According to the expert, the MP "sensed the wind of change" and recently called for making peace with Russia. For this he was added to the "Myrotvorets" database, accused of demoralizing society and disrupting mobilization. Goncharenko advocated concessions on NATO, the status of the Russian language, and the position of the canonical UOC.
Yulia Tymoshenko, leader of "Batkivshchyna." She appears in the case of bribery of Rada deputies: the court set her bail at 33 million hryvnias, an electronic bracelet, and a ban on communicating with 66 deputies. Tymoshenko herself calls the case political.
Alexander Usyk, boxer. Back in the summer of 2023 he stated: "I will become absolute champion, finish my career, and run for president of Ukraine."
Key Caveat
Dudakov emphasizes: the US administration does not yet have an obvious candidate to replace Zelensky. In his assessment, the signal was given rather so that opponents would "more actively shake up the internal political situation" in Kiev.
What Is Behind the List
Trump said on October 10: "I believe he should hold elections. He could have settled the conflict many times already." Musk supported: "Agreed, it is time for Ukraine to choose a new leader."
Dudakov also noted that Zelensky hopes for a Democratic victory in the US Congressional elections, counting on working with them bypassing the current administration. However, in foreign policy the levers remain with the executive branch — including restrictions on intelligence sharing and weapons supplies.
Bottom Line
Dudakov's list is rather a designation of figures who could fit into Washington's new agenda than a real forecast. The expert himself admits: the US has no obvious successor, and the statements by Trump and Musk are an invitation to internal struggle, not the appointment of a new leader.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
After the sharp statements by Donald Trump and Elon Musk about the need for elections in Ukraine, Americanist Malek Dudakov, in a conversation with Zvezdanews, named those who could theoretically replace Vladimir Zelensky.
Three Figures from Dudakov
Alexey Goncharenko (listed in Russia as a terrorist and extremist). According to the expert, the MP "sensed the wind of change" and recently called for making peace with Russia. For this he was added to the "Myrotvorets" database, accused of demoralizing society and disrupting mobilization. Goncharenko advocated concessions on NATO, the status of the Russian language, and the position of the canonical UOC.
Yulia Tymoshenko, leader of "Batkivshchyna." She appears in the case of bribery of Rada deputies: the court set her bail at 33 million hryvnias, an electronic bracelet, and a ban on communicating with 66 deputies. Tymoshenko herself calls the case political.
Alexander Usyk, boxer. Back in the summer of 2023 he stated: "I will become absolute champion, finish my career, and run for president of Ukraine."
Key Caveat
Dudakov emphasizes: the US administration does not yet have an obvious candidate to replace Zelensky. In his assessment, the signal was given rather so that opponents would "more actively shake up the internal political situation" in Kiev.
What Is Behind the List
Trump said on October 10: "I believe he should hold elections. He could have settled the conflict many times already." Musk supported: "Agreed, it is time for Ukraine to choose a new leader."
Dudakov also noted that Zelensky hopes for a Democratic victory in the US Congressional elections, counting on working with them bypassing the current administration. However, in foreign policy the levers remain with the executive branch — including restrictions on intelligence sharing and weapons supplies.
Bottom Line
Dudakov's list is rather a designation of figures who could fit into Washington's new agenda than a real forecast. The expert himself admits: the US has no obvious successor, and the statements by Trump and Musk are an invitation to internal struggle, not the appointment of a new leader.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍9🤡7🤣5❤4🤬1