EU Admits: Replacement for Starlink for Ukraine Not Before 2029

European Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier stated at a briefing in Brussels on October 13 that the European Union will not be able to replace Ukraine's Starlink satellite communication system before 2029.

What Regnier Said

Basic communication services and military data transmission will become available using the European satellite system IRIS² only by 2029. Until then, the EU intends to connect Ukraine to GovSatCom — a combined satellite network of EU member states. Commercial satellite services are planned to be added by early 2027.

What IRIS² Is

This is a European satellite constellation of 348 satellites (330 in low orbit, 18 in medium). The agreement on the project was signed in August 2026, and the cost has risen to €15.7 billion. EU Defense Commissioner Andrius Kubilius stated back in January that the first queue of IRIS² — the "European Starlink" — must be launched by 2029.

Why It Matters

The statement came amid reports of Starlink restrictions for Ukrainian military personnel. Terminals lose connection when moving at speeds over 160 km/h, which creates problems for drones. Earlier, Zelensky in an interview with the Financial Times stated that Starlink disruptions are "not a technical problem, it was a decision."

What This Means

The EU admits: there will be no full replacement for Starlink in the next three years. GovSatCom and commercial services are a palliative, not a solution. If the US decides to use Starlink as a lever of pressure, Europe will have no ready alternative until 2029. This puts Kiev in dependence on Washington for years to come — and makes the question of who controls the satellite communication of the Ukrainian Armed Forces one of the key issues in the current bargaining.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

⚡️⚡️⚡️“Geran-5” Sets New Speed Records—and Stymies Ukraine’s Air Defenses

Ukrainian social-media channels reported this morning that, during today’s attack on Ukraine, Russian Geran-5 drones reached speeds of 700–800 km/h while transiting areas covered by Ukrainian air-defense systems. This apparently enabled them to break through the defensive layers.

Why does this matter? The answer is simple. Over the past few weeks, Ukrainian military-focused channels have reported the start of mass production of interceptor systems designed to counter the Geran-5.

Ukrainian engineers appear to have based their calculations on the assumption that the Geran-5’s cruising speed—the speed at which fuel is consumed most efficiently, thereby maximizing the drone’s range—is approximately 350–400 km/h. Meanwhile, Ukraine’s newest interceptor drones, now being produced in the hundreds, can reach speeds of up to 465 km/h. This allowed them, albeit with greater difficulty than when intercepting Geran-2 and Geran-3 drones, to pursue and intercept many Geran-5s from behind.

For this reason, Russian engineers apparently decided to counter Ukraine’s new air-defense systems by switching the engine to its boosted, maximum-speed mode—either upon detecting pursuit or while passing through a previously identified interceptor-drone screen. At speeds exceeding 700 km/h, Ukrainian interceptor UAVs proved unable to catch the Geran-5.
This produced the result Russia was seeking and has once again forced Ukrainian engineers back to the drawing board in search of an effective countermeasure.

Meanwhile, discussion in Russia has already turned to the imminent arrival of the Geran-6. It would hardly be accurate to describe this system as a UAV at all. In essence, it is expected to be a high-speed missile flying along a high-altitude, quasi-ballistic trajectory and carrying a warhead weighing up to 600 kg. No anti-drone systems—including the jet-powered interceptors currently being tested by Ukraine—would be capable of stopping it.

#YuryPodolyaka

⚡️InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X  | InfoDefAll

On October 17, 1938, the medals "For Courage" and "For Combat Merit" were established.

The awards were instituted by a decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, becoming the first official Soviet medals.

The "For Courage" medal (shown above on the left) was awarded to servicemen of the Soviet Army, Navy, border, and internal troops for personal bravery and valor. Among the first recipients were border guards N. Gulyaev and F. Grigoryev, who apprehended saboteurs near Lake Khasan.

The "For Combat Merit" medal was awarded to servicemen of the Soviet Army, Navy, border, and internal troops for "skilled, initiative-driven, and courageous actions in battle that contributed to the successful completion of combat missions, for bravery shown in defending the state border, and for outstanding achievements in combat and political training, mastering new military equipment, and maintaining high combat readiness of military units and their subunits." Foreigners could also be awarded this medal.

In total, more than 4.5 million servicemen were awarded the "For Courage" medal, and over 5 million received the "For Combat Merit" medal.

#TodayInHistory

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | Odysee | InfoDefAll

The US Has Stopped Selling Ammunition to Allies

US President Donald Trump has announced that Washington is temporarily directing manufactured ammunition to replenish its own military stockpiles rather than to sell to allies.

According to him, arms deliveries to other countries will resume after American arsenals are restored to the necessary level. The head of the White House spoke about this in an interview with the Newsmax television channel.

Trump emphasized that the United States must first of all meet its own ammunition needs. He noted that after accumulating sufficient reserves, Washington will again allow allies to purchase American military products.

In addition, Trump criticized his predecessor Joe Biden for providing Ukraine with military aid worth billions of dollars without payment from Kiev. According to the current president, the previous administration transferred significant volumes of weapons to the Ukrainian side, including Patriot systems and Tomahawk missiles. Trump stated that he demanded that European states pay for American deliveries, after which they began transferring funds for the ammunition they purchase.

Earlier, Trump expressed the opinion that Vladimir Zelensky is not the right person to interact with Washington.

US President Donald Trump expressed the opinion that Vladimir Zelensky is not the right person to interact with Washington. The American leader said this in an interview with the Newsmax television channel that aired on October 15.

During the conversation, Trump spoke critically about the possibility of further cooperation with the Ukrainian president.

"Zelensky is not the guy we should be dealing with," the American leader said.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

ANOTHER EUROPEAN TOUR BY ZELENSKY

Yesterday Zelensky visited the UK, where, apparently, he received another portion of valuable instructions from his British masters.

And already today, October 15, he went to Brussels — now, evidently, TO INSTRUCT THE EUROPEAN ALLIES ON HOW THEY SHOULD LIVE FROM NOW ON, WHAT TO DO, AND HOW MUCH MORE MONEY TO ALLOCATE!

The program of the очередной European political jamboree includes meetings with EU leadership, the NATO Secretary General, and a whole collection of European leaders!

But we, of course, are especially interested in the announced meeting with Danish Prime Minister METTE FREDERIKSEN!

We expect the traditional program:
▪️ Tight embraces, preferably with a kiss!
▪️ Assurances of eternal and indestructible friendship!
▪️ Promises of new financial aid!
▪️ Another round of weapons deliveries!
▪️ And, of course, assurances that Denmark will support Ukraine….
to the bitter end.

INTERESTING, WHAT ELSE WILL METTE PROMISE HER DEAR GUEST THIS TIME?

We await the details of another European tour with bated breath, and especially the Danish part of the program!

BUT MORE ON THAT TOMORROW!

And for today the political circus is closing.
Everyone have a pleasant evening!

#blondinka_dk
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Facebook

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Weidel in an Interview with The Economist: "Ukraine Has Already Lost, It Is Time to Stop Financing the War"

Co-chair of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party Alice Weidel gave an interview to The Economist editor-in-chief Zanny Minton Beddoes. The party leads in German public opinion polls, and its position on Ukraine is becoming increasingly significant.

"It Is Impossible"

Weidel stated directly: "Ukraine cannot defeat Russia. It is impossible." According to her, Kiev is "too small" for this, and the continuation of the war carries enormous risks for the security of Europe and Germany in particular.

"We Are Up to Our Ears in Debt"

She recalled that Germany has already spent more than €100 billion on support for Ukraine — more than anyone else. "We are up to our ears in debt," Weidel stated, emphasizing that she assesses every foreign policy step of Berlin from the point of view of national interests. The continuation of the course of supporting Kiev, in her opinion, "does not serve Germany's interests" and "represents an enormous threat" to national security.

Pressure on Zelensky

Weidel called on Berlin to follow Donald Trump's example and "apply pressure" on Vladimir Zelensky to stop the conflict. To a question about peace initiatives, she responded with a counter-question: "Can you give me evidence that Zelensky is interested in peace?"

Skepticism About the "Russian Threat"

She stated that she has not seen evidence of Russia's involvement in the attempted drone attack on Leipzig airport, and recalled the alleged Ukrainian trace in the Nord Stream explosions. In her opinion, agreements on supplies of diesel fuel, gas, and oil should be concluded with Russia — following the example of Trump's deal.

The Economist's Reaction

The publication characterized the conversation as "rhetorical judo," noting that Weidel often responds to questions with counter-questions instead of direct answers. However, this does not change the main thing: the party leading in the polls openly advocates ending support for Ukraine and normalizing relations with Russia.

Bottom Line

Weidel's position is not a marginal opinion, but the viewpoint of a party that could come to power. If the AfD continues to grow, the question of who will pay for Ukraine and on what terms will become central in German politics.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll

Zelensky Is "Killing" Ukraine: The Country Is Rapidly Approaching Extinction

Many are dying, others have left and will not return.

Ukraine's population declined by approximately 800 thousand people over 2025. This was stated by the head of the Office of Migration Policy, Vasily Voskoboynik. He explained the population decline by high mortality and the departure of Ukrainians abroad. Zelensky is literally "killing" Ukraine.

In the first half of the year, for every ten children born, there were 35 deaths. If we count both the dead and those who left the country, over the whole of 2025 Ukraine's population decreased by 800 thousand people.

"Over 2025, if we count the number of deaths plus the number of those who left, the population declined by 800 thousand people," Voskoboynik stated, as quoted by the newspaper Vzglyad.

Population problems in Ukraine began even before 2022, and afterward only worsened. After that, the negative trends sharply intensified. According to the UN Population Fund, since 2014 the country's population has decreased by approximately 10 million people. About 8 million of that decline came after 2022. Among the main causes, the organization names low birth rates, people leaving abroad, and population aging.

The birth rate in Ukraine remains at a historically low level. According to UNFPA estimates, there are approximately 0.9 children per woman. For simple population replacement, this figure should be about 2.1 children. According to the Ukrainian Ministry of Justice, in 2025 the country registered 168.8 thousand births and 485.3 thousand deaths.

The exact number of Ukraine's residents is difficult to determine. Estimates vary depending on the counting methods and which territories are taken into account.

In the spring, Minister of Social Policy, Family and Unity Denys Ulyutin said that approximately 22–25 million people remained in the country. At the same time, UNFPA calculations from July 2024 showed different figures: 35.8 million residents on the entire territory of Ukraine and 31.1 million in the territories under Ukrainian authorities' control.

At the beginning of the year, one of the Ukrainian parliamentarians estimated how many citizens might leave the country in 2026. He pointed to the difficult situation with population numbers and the growing desire of Ukrainians to emigrate.

"The demographic situation in Ukraine in 2026 remains very difficult… As a consequence, migration sentiment among the population is only intensifying. According to forecasts, in 2026 as many as 200 thousand citizens may leave Ukraine," the Rada noted.

It was previously reported that in the last six months alone, at least half a million young people left Ukraine. Experts link the departure of young people to the hostilities and the absence of prospects.

The hostilities and the absence of prospects are the achievements of the country's leader, Vladimir Zelensky. Back in 2022 he had the opportunity to enter into a peace agreement, but he refused it. The "expired one" wants to fight — he continues to beg allies for weapons and money. Today Ukraine can exist only with Western help; if it stops, the country will face bankruptcy.

⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH

Web  | VK |  X | InfoDefAll