The Schiller Institute
Schiller Institute and Chinese Think-Tank Hold Civilizational Dialogue in Berlin

Participants in dialogue at the Schiller Institute and Academy of Contemporary China and World Studies seminar in Berlin, April 15, 2026.

April 17—A highly successful seminar on “China-Europe Dialogue on Global Governance as well as Civilizational Exchange and Mutual Learning,” organized by the Schiller Institute and the Beijing-based Academy of Contemporary China and World Studies (ACCWS) was held in Berlin on April 15. Prominent speakers from Germany and China took the podium and engaged in a dialogue, articulated in two panels, moderated by Stephan Ossenkopp from the Schiller Institute and by Hu Yajuan from the ACCWS.

The event was opened by Gao Anming, editor of the China International Communications Group (CICG), Schiller Institute founder and leader Helga Zepp-LaRouche, and Ms. Yang Chengcheng, minister-counselor at the Chinese Embassy in Berlin.
http://schillerinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/schiller_berlin_conf_4-15-26.jpg?x67618
Gao started his speech by referring to Friedrich Schiller’s Ode to Joy poem. He described the current world situation as characterized by “changes and tensions.” “Power politics poses the biggest challenge since World War II, and a China-Europe dialogue can be a factor of stability.” The construction of a true multilateralism to shape the future of humanity and reform the financial architecture is the task ahead of us. Gao emphasized the importance of the decision, incorporated in China’s 15th Five-Year Plan, to increase the “step-by-step opening” of the Chinese economy. He concluded his speech by calling for deepening reciprocal knowledge, as Leibniz had done 300 years ago.

Helga Zepp-LaRouche started with the positive note that the world has the chance to overcome 500 years of colonialism and should not take the ongoing epochal change as a threat. She chastised the Western attitude of looking at China with “augmented-reality spectacles,” not seeing the tremendous achievement China has made since 1971, when she first visited the country. She then went into the immediate task ahead, of solving conflicts, starting with Southwest Asia, where, if a nuclear war does not break out, there must be an “enlarged Oasis Plan” that includes Africa. The Schiller Institute has produced a report on the perspectives of a tripartite Europe-China-Africa development strategy that is consistent with Africa’s own 2063 Agenda. The second edition of the report is available in a few advanced copies. Chinese President Xi Jinping’s Global Governance Initiative also reflects principles laid out by the Schiller Institute’s own proposals. Not accidentally, the organization’s complete name is the “Schiller Institute, Association for Statecraft.” Promising Perspectives of China-German Cooperation

Ms. Yang welcomed participants and outlined the promising perspectives of China-German cooperation. China’s economy grew 5% in the first quarter of 2026 and will further open itself to foreign investments, as it was stressed during German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s Feb. 25-26 visit. She mentioned that BASF had opened the world’s most modern chemical plant in China, as an example of the broad potential for cooperation between the world’s second- and third-largest economies.

The first panel, “Quality Opening as Engine of Global Governance,” was opened by ACCWS deputy director Fan Daqi, who briefly presented the result of a research paper by his institute. The paper shows the complementarity of the two economies and the perspective of cooperation in third state markets. He called for strengthening institutional guarantees. He was followed by Michael Bose, chairman of Automotive Berlin Brandenburg (ABB), who addressed the “complex interrelations” of the automobile industry. Comparing the German aut[...]

o industry with the Chinese one today, he said, you must admit that the “teachers have become students.”

Shi Shiwei, director of the Research Center for German-Chinese Trade at China’s University of International Business and Economics, detailed the innovative sectors that are significant for Germany where investments should be directed according to the new Five-Year Plan.

Bernd Einmeier, chairman of the German-Chinese Society for Economy, Education and Culture, stated bluntly that “Germany has no idea of what China is.” He highlighted the high symbolism of the treatment given to Merz’s visit to China, as Chinese leaders agreed to receive him on the day of their most important traditional period, the New Year celebrations.

Oliver Lubich, sales manager at Hainan Airlines in Berlin, said that the potential for air traffic between the German capital and Hainan is much larger than the 55 flights currently established by treaty.

At the end of the panel, moderated by Ossenkopp, the speakers joined the podium for two rounds of questions. Importantly, Einmeier pointed to the different quality of teaching in Germany’s dual-purpose vocational schools, and proposed to integrate Germany’s and China’s educational methods. Director Shi criticized the EU 2030 strategy, which is “focused on only one thing,” namely decarbonization.

The second panel, “Civilizational Exchange and Mutual Learning,” was moderated by Hu Yajuan and was opened by Michael Müller, former mayor of Berlin and member of the Bundestag, the German parliament. Müller recalled how he had opposed the idea of “decoupling” from China when the issue was discussed in German political circles, and is happy that it has been rejected. “We should discuss not if, but how to develop cooperation,” he said. His experience as mayor tells him that a lot can be done with partnerships at the municipal level. Another field where cooperation can advance is science. The third issue is BRICS: it is a reality which one must face. Fourth, climate and demography. “There is not one single crisis which either we or China, alone, can solve.” Müller insisted that in a partnership, both parties must have the right also to address critical aspects. Reason as a Precondition for Learning

Cord Eberspächer, a sinologist and historian at Bonn University, informed the audience that Confucius insisted that “the right content of terms” must be clarified before starting a dialogue. Another way to say this is “reason as precondition,” a curiosity for learning which was key in Leibniz’s fundamental work on China. Unfortunately, this does not occur today. Dialogue is meant differently in China and the West. The West believes that its idea of values is the right one, Eberspächer said in a veiled answer to Müller. So, when Germany sells cars to every country in the world it is called “successful export economy,” but when the Chinese do the same thing, it is called “overcapacity.”

Zhou Hengxiang, Germanist and author, addressed the issue of differences between the German and the Chinese system of law. He gave the example of how the German terms “person” and “man” (human being) are merged in one single term in the Chinese system, thus making it less “clean” to extend the legal term from human beings to corporations, etc.

Rainer Dumpff, CEO of Dumpff Project Management, reported about his decades-long experience in China, from where, as a young man, he wanted to know China in two weeks and soon realized that that was impossible. Among other occupations, he has worked with the aeronautic industry and has represented the Dresdner Musikfestspiele (musical festival) in China.

Yuan Jie, Germanist and columnist, highlighted the recent positive shift in the German government attitude toward China, mentioning statements by Industry Minister Katherina Reiche in a video connection to the inauguration of the BASF plant mentioned above, Merz’s statements on the eve of his visit to China, burying decoupling forever, and the German International Chamb[...]

er of Commerce calling China “a reliable partner.”

In the following podium’s interviews with the panelists, the question was posed: Where do prejudices come from? Eberspächer, among others, said they come from ignorance, and joined the call for more learning about China in schools.

The event was judged by all participants as a promising starting point toward a paradigmatic change in Germany (Europe)-China relations.

Independent Candidates Roundtable:
Untiting to Save the Nation

[Diane Sare was] joined by U.S. Senate candidate Brian McGinnis (NC), and Florida congressional candidates Mark Davis (FL-16) and Aaron Baker (FL-6). This week, we will hash out overcoming the phony political divides in America which are deliberately obstructing the implementation of policy solutions required to save the nation.

youtube.com/live/0kBDxYDfW6c

Movisol
Chi è un partner “inaffidabile”: gli Stati Uniti o la Cina?

La guerra degli Stati Uniti contro l’Iran è vista dai leader cinesi come minaccia diretta ed esistenziale alla Cina per una serie di ragioni, delle quali il petrolio non è la principale. Sebbene il 43% delle importazioni petrolifere del Paese provenga effettivamente dalla regione del Golfo, ora tagliata fuori dalla chiusura dello Stretto di Ormuz, Pechino aveva previsto il problema e ha aumentato di conseguenza le proprie riserve strategiche. Ciò ha fatto infuriare uno dei “cervelli” dietro l’azione bellica del presidente Trump, il segretario al Tesoro Scott Bessent (foto), che accusa la Cina di “inaffidabilità”: “La Cina si è dimostrata un partner globale inaffidabile per tre volte negli ultimi cinque anni”, ha affermato, “una volta durante il Covid, quando ha accumulato scorte di prodotti sanitari, la seconda volta per quanto riguarda le terre rare” (riferendosi ai controlli sulle esportazioni imposti da Pechino in risposta a quelli di Washington). E ora, “ha continuato ad acquistare [petrolio], ha accumulato scorte e ha interrotto le esportazioni di molti prodotti”.
Conoscendo Bessent, dichiarare il falso è il suo mestiere. Le riserve strategiche di petrolio della Cina non sono più grandi di quelle degli Stati Uniti (nonostante oltre il quadruplo della popolazione). In tempi normali, sono stimate in circa 350-400 miliardi di barili per entrambi, ma gli USA hanno una capacità di stoccaggio maggiore. Ora, il Segretario al Tesoro degli Stati Uniti sta minacciando di sanzioni i paesi che continuano ad acquistare petrolio iraniano.
Le sue minacce, tuttavia, non sono una reazione: la Cina era l’obiettivo della guerra fin dall’inizio, come delineato nella Strategia di Sicurezza 2026 del Pentagono. In questo documento la Cina è presentata come una minaccia all’egemonia globale degli Stati Uniti, che a sua volta è in declino perché si basa esclusivamente sulla potenza militare e sul ruolo del dollaro come valuta di riserva. La favola narrata dal governo statunitense è che la Cina e i paesi BRICS vogliano sostituire il dollaro (“de-dollarizzazione”). Ma l’uso dello yuan, legato al commercio fisico ed è perciò in incremento inarrestabile, è aumentato a causa della strumentalizzazione del dollaro da parte di Washington (compreso il sequestro dei beni russi).
La Strategia di Difesa Nazionale 2026 del Pentagono, pur invocando la deterrenza della Cina “attraverso la forza e non il confronto”, sostiene che “la sicurezza, la libertà e la prosperità del popolo americano sono […] direttamente legate alla nostra capacità di commerciare e di agire da una posizione di forza nell’Indo-Pacifico. Se la Cina – o chiunque altro, del resto – dovesse dominare questa vasta e cruciale regione, sarebbe in grado di porre di fatto un veto all’accesso degli americani al centro di gravità economico mondiale, con implicazioni durature per le prospettive economiche della nostra nazione”.
L’attacco all’Iran, sebbene in parte guidato dalle ambizioni di Israele di conquistare l’egemonia regionale, mira a ostacolare la politica cinese della Belt and Road. L’Iran si trova al crocevia tra Asia centrale, Asia meridionale e Medio Oriente, collegando la Cina con la Turchia e l’Europa. Ciò rende l’Iran un nodo di transito per le rotte ferroviarie, stradali e dei gasdotti, collegando sia la cintura terrestre che le rotte marittime.

Sanità italiana e sanità britannica

Una bella notizia sulla sanità di un Paese, l'Italia, il quale, tuttavia, da alcuni decennî sta imitando il Paese anglosassone, la Gran Bretagna, che aveva considerato spacciato un suo suddito.

Movisol
Netanyahu, furioso, se la prende con l’IDF; Israele trattiene il fiato

Per la maggior parte degli israeliani, la fine ufficiale della tregua di due settimane proclamata da Donald Trump ha generato paura e ansia incredibili, poiché nessuno sa cosa accadrà in seguito. La maggior parte presume che la guerra riprenderà, poiché sembra che l’Iran non accetterà i termini richiesti da Netanyahu, che includono, tanto per cominciare, la chiusura totale e verificabile del programma di armi nucleari, la rimozione dell’uranio arricchito e lo smantellamento delle milizie di Hamas e Hezbollah. Benché ciò sia il desiderio dalla maggior parte dei cittadini, un’analisi della stampa israeliana e di diverse fonti indica che Netanyahu e la sua cerchia ristretta nutrirebbero una speranza quasi unanime che la guerra ricominci.
Ciò è dovuto al consenso generale sul fatto che Netanyahu non sia riuscito a raggiungere nessuno dei suoi principali obiettivi bellici e che il raggiungimento di questi obiettivi è una questione esistenziale per Israele. Di conseguenza, nonostante l’accordo di cessate il fuoco con il Libano, l’IDF sta conducendo un assalto in stile Gaza in diverse aree del Libano meridionale, il che include la distruzione di case, scuole, lo smantellamento delle strade e si prevede che ciò continui.
Mentre continua a sbandierare la sua “grande e produttiva amicizia” con Trump, Netanyahu ribolle di rabbia per l’ordine di Trump di interrompere gli attacchi contro il Libano. L’IDF ha sfruttato il cessate il fuoco per “ricaricarsi” in vista di un blitz, che potrebbe comprendere azioni in Siria e persino in Turchia. La notizia che gli Stati Uniti avevano abbordato una nave iraniana è stata interpretata come conferma del fatto che i combattimenti potrebbero riprendere a breve.
Allo stesso tempo, si dice che i capi dell’IDF siano preoccupati che Netanyahu stia preparando un attacco di grande portata contro di loro, in parte per distogliere da sé la colpa di essere stato “impreparato” all’attacco del 7 ottobre, ma anche per il cambiamento di strategia che ha portato al fallimento. Un articolo su Haaretz ha affermato che Netanyahu avrebbe usato l’attacco del 7 ottobre per abbandonare la strategia tradizionale dell’esercito israeliano – basata sulla deterrenza e su attacchi rapidi e devastanti per punire il nemico – e adottare una strategia di genocidio, per forzare l’accettazione del “trasferimento” (leggi: pulizia etnica). Il modello di riferimento era l’espulsione dell’OLP dal Libano nel 1982. Riteneva che l’uccisione dei leader di Hamas e il massacro a Gaza, l’assassinio di Nasrallah e degli alti dirigenti di Hezbollah in Libano, avrebbero spezzato lo spirito di resistenza, consentendo il trasferimento della maggior parte della popolazione rimanente. Questo fallimento è stato causato da valutazioni errate dei servizi segreti riguardo alla resilienza dei nemici, da una strategia fallimentare o da una stima irrealistica della forza militare di Israele? Con le elezioni alle porte, chi se ne assumerà la responsabilità?
Qualunque sia la conclusione finale, l’idea che la vocazione di Israele sia quella di essere una “nuova Sparta”, capace di miracolose vittorie militari con l’aiuto degli Stati Uniti, ha subito un duro colpo. La credenza popolare e ampiamente accettata secondo cui “Israele è il luogo più sicuro al mondo per gli ebrei” è stata definitivamente infranta da questa esperienza, poiché gli israeliani sono stati costretti a correre nei rifugi antiaerei due o tre volte al giorno. E alla base di tutte le paure c’è il timore che, se Trump tentasse di frenare Netanyahu, questi potrebbe rispondere lanciando un attacco nucleare.

The Schiller Institute
‘Let’s Get Real.’

International Peace Coalition, Report on #151

by EIR staff

April 24—The International Peace Coalition (IPC) commenced its 151st consecutive weekly online meeting with an overview by Schiller Institute founder and IPC initiator Helga Zepp-LaRouche, who noted that the Chinese government has called upon its citizens to leave Iran, which may mean that they have information on the immanent resumption of the war with United States and Israel. The continuous two month blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which has been caused by this unprovoked war of aggression against Iran, has put the world in acute danger of falling into an economic depression with incredible social consequences. There are already severe shortages of oil, energy prices are increasing, and shortages of fertilizer are endangering the world’s food supply.
Zepp-LaRouche said that there is an urgent need to establish a New International Security and Development Architecture which takes account of the interests of all nations. Although that idea had been dismissed by many in the past, she said, now that the world is collapsing that idea is gaining resonance and people are beginning to ask how international relations among nations can be reestablished based upon principles. The only institution which has called for a such a principled return to international law, other than the Schiller Institute and the IPC, is the government of China which has put forward its four global initiatives, in particular its Global Governance Initiative, which is a framework of how to rearrange international relations based on the UN Charter and the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence.

Other consequences of the collapse of the present system include the Persian Gulf states, which had a business model where they relied on the presence of American bases to guarantee their security, but as it turns out, the United States only protects Israel. These countries are now in a very difficult position, she said, feeling the economic effects of the war. There is an urgent need to discuss: what do we do with this region of Southwest Asia when the war ends? Zepp-LaRouche said that for this reason, the Schiller Institute has put forward an Extended Oasis Plan for the region; the creation of large amounts of new fresh water with nuclear desalination of ocean water brought in by canals; the building of economic development corridors extending from India to the Mediterranean, from the Caucuses to the Persian Gulf.

Pope Leo XIV’s trip to Africa has been a very significant development, she said. In the United States, support for President Donald Trump is rapidly declining, even among his MAGA base. Since the U.S. Congress abdicated the right to declare war, “it is their urgent responsibility to take it back.”

María de los Ángeles Huerta del Río, former Congresswoman from Mexico, warned that most important wars of the 21st Century are fought not with drones and missiles, but with algorithms and the battlefield is the human mind. This is called “hybrid warfare.” Ultraconservative think tanks like the Atlas Network are linked with Silicon Valley tech giants and legions of propaganda influencers. Latin America has become a testing ground for these techniques. We need instead to make it into a zone of “cognitive peace.”  She proposed that the nations of this region reassert the role of national media to combat propaganda, and that they join forces in these endeavors in a “South-South” alliance to stand up to the power of the global media giants, an alliance for “cognitive sovereignty and digital justice.”

Dennis Fritz, U.S. Air Force Command Chief Master Sergeant (ret.) and current Senior Fellow at the Eisenhower Media Network, spoke as a military man who has seen the inner workings of the Pentagon. He said that he has been warning about the Iran war which is happening right now for decades. “How did I know it was comin[...]

g? I saw the plan” and it goes back to 1992. Retired U.S. four-star General Wesley Clark revealed that after the September 11, 2001 terror attacks he was told by a Pentagon general of the plan for the United States to take out seven countries within five years. “We are the cause of the majority of the problems around the world,” Fritz said. We claim to stand for democracy and freedom, but we destroy those things around the world. We started a war in Ukraine, at the expense of Ukraine, to weaken Russia. The entire world is being held hostage to an economic disaster, due to a war that we started in Iran. We are currently blockading Cuba, starving women and children. The huge sums of money we spend on war could have enormous benefits to the civilian economy.

Zepp-LaRouche responded that the idea of billionaires becoming trillionaires through war profiteering must become a topic of public debate.

Independent U.S. presidential candidate Diane Sare said that she has been in a fight to get the U.S. Congress to assume the responsibility for declaring war, as the Constitution requires in Article I, Section 8. We see partisan posturing; Democrats hope that the war continues so that Trump and the Republicans will be held responsible on election day. Sare and congressional candidate Jose Vega—who has qualified for ballot status as a Democrat and is now petitioning to also get on the ballot as an independent in New York’s 15th congressional district (the Bronx)— are pulling together a coalition of independent candidates across the United States. Regarding the physical economy, she said, “Let’s get real.” We used to understand the relationship between maintaining our infrastructure and meeting the needs of the population.

Mike Callicrate, Kansas cattle rancher and founder of Ranch Foods Direct, warned that we cannot feed ourselves currently, we have lost more than half our ranchers, and we import food from poor countries. “Global food policy should protect people, not predators.”

Jack Gilroy, of Veterans for Peace and Pax Christi, reported on a visit to Washington D.C., where 150 individuals from 5 or 6 different veterans’ organizations went into the U.S. Capitol Rotunda bearing red tulips for the people killed in Iran. Seventy U.S. veterans were arrested as they stood at parade rest.

Larry Johnson is a former CIA analyst and Deputy Director of the U.S. State Department’s Office of Counterterrorism from 1989 to 1993. He said that Trump is delusional about his accomplishments and shows lack of emotional control. This is particularly apparent in Trump’s attacks on his former supporters like American conservative commentator Tucker Carlson and former Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (from Georgia’s 14th Congressional District) who have become his critics. The petulant name-calling is what we might expect from a twelve-year-old. At the recent emergency meeting on Iran, Trump began to openly talk about using a nuclear weapon, according to multiple sources. Later in public statements he ruled out the use of nukes, and we hope that he remembers that he said that. Trump said that he is waiting for a specific proposal from Iran, when Iran’s ten-point plan proposal was sent ten days ago. The United States does not have enough ships to have a full blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, despite the claims that they are making.

Johnson said that neither the Iranians nor the Americans appreciate the global consequences of closing the Strait. Those consequences are beginning to be seen now. In particular, the disruption of supplies of urea for fertilizer will devastate world food production. People in our government who are responsible for anticipating and addressing this impending crisis are clueless.

Independent presidential candidate Diane Sare recalled that President Joe Biden was senile, but everyone pretended he was fine, as he pursued a policy of war and genocide. Now Trump continues Biden’s policies, and Trump is also losing his mind, while public figures pretend t[...]

hat his behavior is normal.

LaRouche Organization organizer Tim Rush reported on the activity of delegations of citizens who visited Congress on April 22, reaching roughly 40 offices of leading members of the House of Representatives to hand-deliver letters, both from their constituents, and from leaders of other nations, who emphasized that “it’s a question of world heritage that the founding principles of the United States must be revived.” Co-moderator Dennis Small read from a selection of these international letters, including from a 90-year-old nun in Barcelona, Spain. In response, Zepp-LaRouche sent special greetings to this nun, and called attention to the exemplary role of Spain in the current strategic situation. She said that she hoped that the people of Spain would “encourage the idea” of Spain being kicked out of NATO.

Discussion

Mike Callicrate stressed the importance of restoring a relationship between farmers and ranchers, and the communities in which they operate. Global agribusinesses have strangled food production and created food scarcity.

A participant asked, What if Iran were to reopen the Strait of Hormuz as a benevolent gesture, in the expectation of fairness. Is this thinkable? Zepp-LaRouche replied that the questioner should put herself in the shoes of Iranian leaders who have no reason to trust the United States or Israel, and they must look out for the safety and welfare of their citizens. Dennis Small reminded the meeting that it is actually the United States which is presently blocking the Strait.

A Spanish participant stressed the injustice of the U.S. siege of Cuba, a nation which has often demonstrated solidarity with other developing nations.

In concluding remarks, Zepp-LaRouche stated that the need to unite the international peace movement is more urgent than ever. She referred to the presentation by former Congresswoman María de los Ángeles Huerta del Río as being particularly important, since the issue of “narrative control” has emerged as central in the struggle for peace.

«Sviluppo nuovo nome della pace».

Il paradigma soluzione alle guerre in Gaza, in Libano, in Iran, ecc. è il PIANO OASI di Lyndon LaRouche e dello Schiller Institute

https://youtube.com/shorts/VNoinK0TY7c

The Schiller Institute
Live Dialogue with Helga Zepp-LaRouche:Trump Rolls Out the Red Carpet for the British Malthusian King.

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org.
Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Wednesday, April 29 2026, 11am ET/ 5pm CET Take a step back from the rush of the day’s events, and the fact that the old order has collapsed is dramatically evident. The Western casino economics system is cracking up with debt, crypto, and non-production. The Western military system—whether Global NATO or unilateral U.S. or EU—is exposed as dead-head bellicosity. The Western political and cultural system is seen as an Epstein Class horror show. Emblematic is this week’s trip by the British King and Queen to the United States during the U.S. 250th anniversary of America defeating the British Empire. The spectacle began today with music, flags and red carpet on the tarmac at Air Force Base Andrews, followed by a tea party in town.

The LaRouche Organization has released a statement for Washington, D.C. and international circulation: “The British Are Back To Finish the War of 1812— This Time by Invitation” ,or, “LaRouche Was Right!”

The statement reads: … “Who invited the British Royals to address a joint session of the U.S. Congress on the 250th anniversary of the American Declaration of Independence? Formally speaking, the invitation was issued appropriately enough on April Fool’s Day, 2026, by the following fools: Speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. But as we’ve seen on too many occasions, it doesn’t seem to be the members of Congress calling the shots, but rather their big-money Epstein-class owners.

American economist and eight-time presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche was famous for his identification of the British Empire as the source of most of the evil on the planet, particularly since British Lord Bertrand Russell took over science at the turn of the 20th century.

This assessment has not been unique to LaRouche: In 1776 it was the subject of the American Declaration of Independence, which includes a long list of grievances (crimes) committed by the British against the American colonists. The British never apologized for these abuses, but went on to attempt to burn down Washington in 1812, and to promote the slave trade and the Confederacy during the misnamed “Civil War.”

After the United States became an independent republic, the British were also involved in a series of assassinations of American presidents, as documented in a report commissioned by Lyndon LaRouche and written by historian Anton Chaitkin: “Why the British Kill American Presidents.” While the British have never offered reparations for their crimes, it is to be noted that God sent Queen Elizabeth II to hell on the 100th anniversary of Lyndon LaRouche’s birth, September 8, 2022 (and thus bringing her son Charles to the throne). …”

Helga Zepp-LaRouche, Schiller Institute founder and leader, emphatically made the observation today that “the collapse of the old order is undeniable.” This means that, “it is no longer utopian” to mobilize for a new system. “We must have a new order.”

The extreme danger if this change of direction does not come about is seen in the insanity of certain European nations squaring off against Russia, a nuclear power. German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius issued a statement April 22 about the military strategy of the German armed forces, stressing that Russia poses an acute threat to Germany, [...]

and hence a massive mobilization for re-armament is necessary. He proclaimed, “We are developing the Bundeswehr into the strongest conventional army in Europe,” and went into short-, medium- and long-term goals for superiority. The prospects for the German economy to succeed in doing this are delusionary, but the intent itself is madness.

Join the mobilization of the LaRouche Movement, join the 152nd meeting of the International Peace Coalition this coming Friday.

Oggi pomeriggio, ore 17 italiane

🇮🇹 Trump stende il tappeto rosso per il re malthusiano

🇺🇸 Trump Rolls Out the Red Carpet for the British Malthusian King

youtube.com/live/eoml7b5-PdE

Join Helga Zepp-LaRouche in her live dialogue and discuss the issues and solutions that move the world and its people. Send your questions & comments to questions@schillerinstitute.org

Please share the YouTube link with your friends, acquaintances, and colleagues to increase the reach of the solutions presented by the LaRouche movement.

Il Corriere della Sera titola «Re Carlo, missione compiuta»

Ascolta quel che ha avuto da dire Harley Schlanger:

https://t.me/MoviSol/9714

Oppure oggi pomeriggio Helga Zepp-LaRouche:

https://t.me/MoviSol/9715

Movisol
Un’occasione di cambiamento che non possiamo permetterci di perdere

Tra le notizie in rapida evoluzione che arrivano ogni giorno, è utile fare un passo indietro e riflettere sul quadro strategico più ampio del mondo. Ciò che emerge è che l’ordine mondiale che ha prevalso almeno dalla fine della Guerra Fredda è innegabilmente finito. Abbiamo ampiamente trattato vari aspetti di tale crollo nella nostra newsletter, proponendo al contempo un’alternativa che soddisfi le aspirazioni del mondo non occidentale, ovvero della “Maggioranza Globale”.
La guerra di aggressione illegale contro l’Iran conferma la fine del mondo “unipolare”, poiché gli Stati Uniti e Israele non sono stati in grado di sconfiggere la Repubblica Islamica, né di attuare un cambio di regime, e si trovano in un dilemma su come procedere. La parte iraniana ha rifiutato negoziati diretti con Washington fintanto che il blocco navale rimane in vigore, ma è comunque impegnata in attivi sforzi diplomatici, in particolare con il Pakistan, la Russia e l’Oman. Prima dell’incontro con il presidente russo Putin il 27 aprile, il ministro degli Esteri iraniano Araghchi si era recato nuovamente a Islamabad per ulteriori colloqui con le autorità pakistane, che sono in contatto con i negoziatori statunitensi. Secondo quanto riferito, Teheran propone ora di separare la questione dell’arricchimento nucleare dai colloqui sulla riapertura dello Stretto di Hormuz e sulla fine della guerra, che potrebbero andare avanti.
La proposta sembra ragionevole, dati gli effetti disastrosi della chiusura dello Stretto, ma la risposta della squadra di Trump non è stata resa nota pubblicamente, al momento della stesura di questo articolo. È vero che, a parte le spacconate, l’amministrazione Trump non è in una posizione di forza. In tale contesto, sono trapelate notizie sulla reale entità dei danni alle basi e alle attrezzature statunitensi nel Golfo, nonché sulla carenza di munizioni, missili e intercettori. Inoltre, il presidente degli Stati Uniti è impegnato a festeggiare re Carlo, giunto a Washington per cercare di rilanciare la “relazione speciale” anglo-americana. Tale relazione include il sostegno alla politica imperiale delle guerre infinite (quelle che l’Impero britannico era solito definire “splendide piccole guerre nelle colonie”), come l’aggressione contro l’Iran e il più ampio scontro con Russia e Cina.
Ad aggiungersi al caos a Washington, c’è l’attentato avvenuto durante la cena dei corrispondenti all’Hilton Hotel il 25 aprile. Se scartiamo l’ipotesi del lupo solitario, dobbiamo ipotizzare che esso sia stato un avvertimento. A fare o non fare che cosa? Dato che il timone della politica della Casa Bianca è retto da chi di solito trae profitto dagli attentati, c’è da pensare che il messaggio lanciato è: non sgarrare. Questo perché è evidente che comunque ci sono linee discordi a Washington, su come uscire dalla trappola iraniana. Qualunque sia la verità su quell’incidente, e al di là delle narrazioni che ora circolano ampiamente, esso non ha certamente aumentato la fiducia dei cittadini americani nei loro funzionari eletti e anche nei media. Il tasso di approvazione di Donald Trump è sceso a circa il 33%, e l’umore della popolazione, compresi gli elettori MAGA, si è decisamente spostato contro la guerra USA-Israele.
Benché i pericoli siano grandi, ciò crea anche l’opportunità di eliminare una volta per tutte il fallito ordine unipolare e di introdurre una nuova prospettiva, come quella delineata da Helga Zepp-LaRouche nella sua intervista alla televisione pakistana (foto).

Movisol
Re Carlo negli Stati Uniti: una vergogna per la Repubblica americana

Il 27 aprile, re Carlo III e la regina Camilla hanno dato il via a una visita di Stato di quattro giorni negli Stati Uniti, al fine di celebrare, secondo Buckingham Palace, “i legami storici e le moderne relazioni bilaterali” tra la Gran Bretagna e gli Stati Uniti. Dopo aver partecipato a un banchetto di Stato alla Casa Bianca in onore delle due teste coronate il 27 aprile, Carlo ha parlato davanti a una seduta congiunta del Congresso degli Stati Uniti, il secondo monarca britannico a farlo, dopo sua madre Elisabetta nel 1991. Sull’invito dei leader del Congresso era scritto, senza alcun apparente imbarazzo, che “l’esperimento americano perdura in gran parte grazie alla tradizione britannica da cui ha avuto origine”.
Una dichiarazione diffusa dall’Organizzazione LaRouche ricorda che re Carlo è l’erede di un impero il cui bilancio include: la tratta degli schiavi e la spartizione dell’Africa; la conquista, lo smembramento e la fame dell’Irlanda; le guerre dell’oppio contro la Cina; la colonizzazione e la spartizione dell’India, comprese le carestie del Bengala; lo smembramento dell’Asia sud-occidentale con l’accordo Sykes-Picot; e, cosa più rilevante per questa settimana, il progetto post-guerra fredda di organizzazione dell’Anglosfera per un confronto permanente contro Russia, Cina e Iran.
Questa non è la “tradizione” da cui è “scaturito” l’esperimento americano. È, più precisamente, la tradizione contro la quale è stata condotta la Rivoluzione Americana e su cui è stata fondata la Repubblica degli Stati Uniti. I membri del Congresso avrebbero dovuto interrogare Carlo sul suo insabbiamento della vicenda Epstein, ovvero su ciò che sapeva della lunga frequentazione del fratello minore, l’ex principe Andrea, con il pederasta Jeffrey Epstein e sui reati finanziari della “classe Epstein” che continuano ancora oggi. Quanto al presidente Trump, aveva ampiamente messo in mostra l’infantile fascino per lo sfarzo britannico durante la sua visita al Castello di Windsor lo scorso settembre.
Abbiamo chiesto alla candidata presidenziale indipendente Diane Sare un commento sulla visita il giorno in cui i reali sono arrivati a Washington: “Se Benjamin Franklin fosse stato a conoscenza del fatto che nel 250° anniversario della Dichiarazione di Indipendenza, re Carlo avrebbe pronunciato un discorso davanti a una sessione congiunta del Congresso e ci avrebbe invitato a entrare a far parte del Commonwealth britannico, avrebbe concluso che il popolo americano aveva deciso di non ‘mantenere’ la Repubblica”, ci ha detto la Sare (il suo riferimento è alla famosa risposta di Franklin quando gli fu chiesto cosa fosse stato dato agli americani con la firma della Dichiarazione d’Indipendenza: “una Repubblica, se riuscite a mantenerla”).
Diane Sare ha inoltre osservato: “Considero la sua [di Carlo] visita in linea con quella del criminale di guerra Bibi Netanyahu e del truffatore ucraino Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Purtroppo, come possiamo vedere dall’incapacità di promulgare una Risoluzione sui Poteri di Guerra e di porre fine alla guerra illegale di aggressione contro l’Iran, il Congresso degli Stati Uniti non si prende sul serio. Sono lieta di sostenere l’iniziativa dell’Organizzazione LaRouche, che manifesterà contro la sua visita a Washington, D.C.”

Diane Sare: Did you hear what the King said to Congress?

Below is a short excerpt of King Charles' address to the joint session of Congress. I'm sure George Washington, Ben Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and too many others to mention here are turning over in their graves at the thought of the United States and the British Empire sharing a common outlook on the world.

We have nearly lost the republic on the 250th anniversary of our Declaration of Independence, and it is a campaign promise of mine that I will do everything possible to restore Americans' knowledge of the history of our nation, as well as a dedication to upholding the universal principles expressed in our founding documents.

To that end, a few months ago, I began a project of reading short excerpts of speeches, essays, and letters of great American leaders. I discovered that it was impossible to do this on a daily basis, and I would like to share the joy of re-reading these treasured documents with a broad base of the American people.

📹 Video submissions welcome

Therefore, my campaign is inviting you to read aloud your favorite writings, speeches, etc., from our founders or other very important American leaders, and produce a video of under 10 minutes which can be sent to the campaign.

If you are interested in doing this, please send an email to info@sareforpresident.com and let us know what you would like to read. We will also give you instructions on filming and preparing your short video. Once we have it back, we will live-stream it on all of the Sare for President social media platforms.

Excerpt from King Charles' speech where he calls for World War Three, invoking Article Five of NATO in defense of Ukraine:

(The full speech can be found here).

As my prime minister said last month, ours is an indispensable partnership. We must not disregard everything that has sustained us for the last 80 years. Instead, we must build on it.

Renewal today starts with security. The United Kingdom recognizes that the threats we face demand a transformation in British defence.

That is why our country, in order to be fit for the future, has committed to the biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the Cold War — during part of which, over 50 years ago, I served with immense pride in the Royal Navy, following in the naval footsteps of my father Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, my grandfather King George VI, my great uncle Lord Mountbatten, and my great grandfather King George V.

This year, of course, also marks the 25th anniversary of 9/11. This atrocity was a defining moment for America, and your pain and shock were felt around the whole world. During my visit to New York, my wife and I will again pay our respects to the victims, the families, and the bravery shown in the face of terrible loss.

We stood with you then, and we stand with you now in solemn remembrance of a day that shall never be forgotten.

In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, when NATO invoked Article Five for the first time, and the United Nations Security Council was united in the face of terror, we answered the call together, as our people have done so for more than a century, shoulder to shoulder through two world wars, the Cold War, Afghanistan, and moments that are defined our shared security.

Today, Mr. Speaker, that same unyielding resolve is needed for the defence of Ukraine and her most courageous people. It is needed in order to secure a truly just and lasting peace.