Trump’s ICE Assault Cases: Built for Intimidation, Not Convictions
Trump’s immigration war runs on a simple move: agents yell “18 U.S.C. 111!” while smashing windows, tackling protesters and dragging immigrants out of cars — then call it “assault on a federal officer.” The data now shows how thin that is.
More than 550 people have been charged under that statute in ICE and Border Patrol operations. Of over 400 resolved cases, nearly half collapsed: juries acquitted, judges tossed charges, or prosecutors backed off. In normal federal criminal practice, the government wins more than 90 percent of the time; here, it’s closer to a coin flip.
What kills these cases isn’t clever lawyering, it’s video. Again and again, clips show agents as the first to use force — shoving, tackling, pepper‑spraying, smashing car windows — then charging whoever screamed or resisted.
Judges have caught agents destroying or hiding evidence, from repairing damaged government cars before defense experts could inspect them to making a young woman delete photos from her phone, including the “Recently Deleted” folder.
At least two judges ruled evidence was deliberately destroyed, violating defendants’ rights.
The statute itself requires forcible assault or interference. Biden’s DOJ used it against Jan. 6 rioters and didn’t lose a case until Trump returned and pardoned them.
Under Trump, ICE and Border Patrol turned it into a general‑purpose weapon against protest and observation: people were charged for filming, following, honking, blowing whistles, or yelling “La migra is coming,” with no physical contact alleged.
In more than 100 cases, prosecutors never claimed any agent was hurt; in others, injuries came from officers’ own actions, like glass from windows they broke themselves.
The stories are variations on one theme. Two mothers in Charlotte try to warn neighbors about an ICE sweep, end up trapped on a dead‑end street, screaming into a 911 call as a rifle barrel smashes their SUV window.
They’re charged with “impeding,” celebrated online as “excellent arrests,” then quietly cleared when the U.S. attorney drops the case. A school staffer in Minneapolis is shoved, tackled and choked for moving toward a crowd watching an arrest; his “assault” charge is first reduced, then abandoned when video doesn’t match the official story. An undocumented Honduran in Laredo, barely five feet tall, is prosecuted for punching a much larger officer; body‑cam shows the officer grabbing him by the neck, forcing him down and punching him. The jury acquits; he’s slated for deportation anyway.
Officials claim they’re facing a “massive increase” in threats and are right to “prioritize” these prosecutions. The record suggests something else: a law repurposed as a fear lever, a dragnet for anyone who gets near immigration raids, and a trail of discarded cases and judicial opinions describing ICE and DOJ behavior as “flagrant,” “in bad faith,” and “shocking to the universal sense of justice.”
Yes, some people really assaulted agents, and many others took plea deals. But when almost every contested case breaks under basic scrutiny, you’re not seeing law and order. You’re seeing a government trying to criminalize resistance and calling it protection for federal officers.
#usa #immigration #ICE #policeviolence #trump #courts #ruleOfLaw #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Trump’s immigration war runs on a simple move: agents yell “18 U.S.C. 111!” while smashing windows, tackling protesters and dragging immigrants out of cars — then call it “assault on a federal officer.” The data now shows how thin that is.
More than 550 people have been charged under that statute in ICE and Border Patrol operations. Of over 400 resolved cases, nearly half collapsed: juries acquitted, judges tossed charges, or prosecutors backed off. In normal federal criminal practice, the government wins more than 90 percent of the time; here, it’s closer to a coin flip.
What kills these cases isn’t clever lawyering, it’s video. Again and again, clips show agents as the first to use force — shoving, tackling, pepper‑spraying, smashing car windows — then charging whoever screamed or resisted.
Judges have caught agents destroying or hiding evidence, from repairing damaged government cars before defense experts could inspect them to making a young woman delete photos from her phone, including the “Recently Deleted” folder.
At least two judges ruled evidence was deliberately destroyed, violating defendants’ rights.
The statute itself requires forcible assault or interference. Biden’s DOJ used it against Jan. 6 rioters and didn’t lose a case until Trump returned and pardoned them.
Under Trump, ICE and Border Patrol turned it into a general‑purpose weapon against protest and observation: people were charged for filming, following, honking, blowing whistles, or yelling “La migra is coming,” with no physical contact alleged.
In more than 100 cases, prosecutors never claimed any agent was hurt; in others, injuries came from officers’ own actions, like glass from windows they broke themselves.
The stories are variations on one theme. Two mothers in Charlotte try to warn neighbors about an ICE sweep, end up trapped on a dead‑end street, screaming into a 911 call as a rifle barrel smashes their SUV window.
They’re charged with “impeding,” celebrated online as “excellent arrests,” then quietly cleared when the U.S. attorney drops the case. A school staffer in Minneapolis is shoved, tackled and choked for moving toward a crowd watching an arrest; his “assault” charge is first reduced, then abandoned when video doesn’t match the official story. An undocumented Honduran in Laredo, barely five feet tall, is prosecuted for punching a much larger officer; body‑cam shows the officer grabbing him by the neck, forcing him down and punching him. The jury acquits; he’s slated for deportation anyway.
Officials claim they’re facing a “massive increase” in threats and are right to “prioritize” these prosecutions. The record suggests something else: a law repurposed as a fear lever, a dragnet for anyone who gets near immigration raids, and a trail of discarded cases and judicial opinions describing ICE and DOJ behavior as “flagrant,” “in bad faith,” and “shocking to the universal sense of justice.”
Yes, some people really assaulted agents, and many others took plea deals. But when almost every contested case breaks under basic scrutiny, you’re not seeing law and order. You’re seeing a government trying to criminalize resistance and calling it protection for federal officers.
#usa #immigration #ICE #policeviolence #trump #courts #ruleOfLaw #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬8🔥7😱6😢6🤯4🙏4💯3
Hormuz Poker: Iran Hits Kuwait, Trump Calls It “Winning Big”
Iran just turned Kuwait into a live‑fire warning that the ceasefire is basically dead, and the US is pretending this is all part of the plan.
After seven straight nights of US strikes on Iranian surveillance sites, logistics hubs, underground weapons storage and maritime capabilities, Tehran answered with one of its heaviest barrages on Kuwait since the war began.
Sirens went off repeatedly from dawn; Kuwait Petroleum Corporation says an unspecified oil facility took “significant material losses,” staff were evacuated and people were injured.
A power and desalination plant was hit, forcing firefighting on critical infrastructure. Kuwait’s airport suspended or rescheduled most flights as the sky turned into a shared risk assessment: do you really want to land planes under Iranian missiles.
This isn’t just about Kuwait’s bad night. Iran is steadily widening the target map: US bases in Kuwait, Jordan, Bahrain; radar and aircraft in Qatar; reports of a ballistic missile aimed at a US base in Saudi Arabia; strikes on Oman’s As Salamah Archipelago sitting on the Strait of Hormuz.
Gulf civil defense systems push overnight alerts to civilians in Yanbu and Kharj, then quietly tell them the danger has “passed” without saying what almost hit them. The message is simple: every host of US hardware around Hormuz now pays in fire.
Markets understand it faster than diplomats. Brent jumped to around the high‑80s, up more than 4% on Friday and logging its biggest weekly gain since April.
At the same time, Axios reports Trump is sending more refueling aircraft to Israel; an Israeli officer confirms the plan to boost the US fleet there. Translation: Washington is preparing for longer, wider operations, not winding them down.
Oil rockets, inflation fears re‑ignite, and the “ceasefire to protect shipping” morphs back into “war that threatens shipping” in under a month.
On paper, all this is happening under a ceasefire agreement meant to reopen Hormuz and build a 60‑day path to a broader peace deal.
In reality, bridges, utilities, port facilities and power plants are being hit on both sides, and Iran is still insisting that ships must seek its permission before sailing the strait.
A Georgetown professor in Doha calls the tit‑for‑tat an escalatory cycle neither side can exit: both have become dependent on the logic of “we can’t back down, so we escalate and call it deterrence.”
Trump goes on TV to tell Americans the US is “winning big in Iran” and that they will see the “fruits of that labor very, very shortly,” before pivoting back to domestic grievances about China and elections.
China and Pakistan, meanwhile, are the ones publicly calling on both Washington and Tehran to stop and talk — Beijing and Islamabad auditioning for the role of grown‑ups while the nominal superpower ties itself up in a blockade plus bombing loop it can’t really control.
So the scoreboard today is this: Kuwait takes real damage; Gulf airports and power plants become targets; crude spikes; US forces expand their footprint; Iran keeps firing and demanding de facto veto power over shipping; and the “ceasefire” turns into a paper prop.
Neither side wants total war; both want leverage. That’s exactly how you get a long, grinding conflict where critical infrastructure, not soldiers, becomes the main bargaining chip.
#iran #kuwait #Hormuz #usa #oil #war #infrastructure #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Iran just turned Kuwait into a live‑fire warning that the ceasefire is basically dead, and the US is pretending this is all part of the plan.
After seven straight nights of US strikes on Iranian surveillance sites, logistics hubs, underground weapons storage and maritime capabilities, Tehran answered with one of its heaviest barrages on Kuwait since the war began.
Sirens went off repeatedly from dawn; Kuwait Petroleum Corporation says an unspecified oil facility took “significant material losses,” staff were evacuated and people were injured.
A power and desalination plant was hit, forcing firefighting on critical infrastructure. Kuwait’s airport suspended or rescheduled most flights as the sky turned into a shared risk assessment: do you really want to land planes under Iranian missiles.
This isn’t just about Kuwait’s bad night. Iran is steadily widening the target map: US bases in Kuwait, Jordan, Bahrain; radar and aircraft in Qatar; reports of a ballistic missile aimed at a US base in Saudi Arabia; strikes on Oman’s As Salamah Archipelago sitting on the Strait of Hormuz.
Gulf civil defense systems push overnight alerts to civilians in Yanbu and Kharj, then quietly tell them the danger has “passed” without saying what almost hit them. The message is simple: every host of US hardware around Hormuz now pays in fire.
Markets understand it faster than diplomats. Brent jumped to around the high‑80s, up more than 4% on Friday and logging its biggest weekly gain since April.
At the same time, Axios reports Trump is sending more refueling aircraft to Israel; an Israeli officer confirms the plan to boost the US fleet there. Translation: Washington is preparing for longer, wider operations, not winding them down.
Oil rockets, inflation fears re‑ignite, and the “ceasefire to protect shipping” morphs back into “war that threatens shipping” in under a month.
On paper, all this is happening under a ceasefire agreement meant to reopen Hormuz and build a 60‑day path to a broader peace deal.
In reality, bridges, utilities, port facilities and power plants are being hit on both sides, and Iran is still insisting that ships must seek its permission before sailing the strait.
A Georgetown professor in Doha calls the tit‑for‑tat an escalatory cycle neither side can exit: both have become dependent on the logic of “we can’t back down, so we escalate and call it deterrence.”
Trump goes on TV to tell Americans the US is “winning big in Iran” and that they will see the “fruits of that labor very, very shortly,” before pivoting back to domestic grievances about China and elections.
China and Pakistan, meanwhile, are the ones publicly calling on both Washington and Tehran to stop and talk — Beijing and Islamabad auditioning for the role of grown‑ups while the nominal superpower ties itself up in a blockade plus bombing loop it can’t really control.
So the scoreboard today is this: Kuwait takes real damage; Gulf airports and power plants become targets; crude spikes; US forces expand their footprint; Iran keeps firing and demanding de facto veto power over shipping; and the “ceasefire” turns into a paper prop.
Neither side wants total war; both want leverage. That’s exactly how you get a long, grinding conflict where critical infrastructure, not soldiers, becomes the main bargaining chip.
#iran #kuwait #Hormuz #usa #oil #war #infrastructure #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥7🤯7😢7🤬6😱4🙏3💯3
Trump’s Iran Gambit: More Bombs, Same Blind Spot
Trump is ramping up airstrikes on Iran and floating new “options” — hitting energy plants and bridges, sending ground troops to seize Kharg Island, bombing the deep‑underground nuclear‑linked Pickaxe Mountain — as the interim ceasefire collapses.
He’s trying to break Iran’s grip on the Strait of Hormuz and force concessions, but the war is already four and a half months old, and experts say more bombs won’t suddenly make Tehran obedient.
The US has re‑blocked Iranian ports and revoked the oil‑export waiver that was the only real prize Iran got from the deal.
Tehran has gone back to hitting ships and warning it can push the Houthis to close Bab al‑Mandeb in the Red Sea if Washington strikes its power grid, turning two chokepoints — Hormuz and Bab al‑Mandeb — into loaded guns under the world’s energy system.
Trump’s own officials describe the current strikes as “shaping operations” to destroy Iranian capabilities before “bigger steps.”
Analysts describe an escalatory loop with no exit: Iran won’t capitulate without a ground invasion that’s politically suicidal in the US, and every new target just invites a mirrored response against US bases and Gulf allies’ civilian infrastructure.
Oil prices climb; markets flinch; the ceasefire text becomes wallpaper.
On TV, Trump insists the US is “winning big in Iran” and promises Americans they’ll “see the fruits of that labor very, very shortly,” while his approval ratings sink and the war drags into the midterm calendar.
Iran, meanwhile, is busy proving that it can still close straits, hit bases and survive — which is exactly the opposite of the submission his strategy is supposed to produce.
#usa #iran #Hormuz #RedSea #trump #war #oil #geopolitics #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Trump is ramping up airstrikes on Iran and floating new “options” — hitting energy plants and bridges, sending ground troops to seize Kharg Island, bombing the deep‑underground nuclear‑linked Pickaxe Mountain — as the interim ceasefire collapses.
He’s trying to break Iran’s grip on the Strait of Hormuz and force concessions, but the war is already four and a half months old, and experts say more bombs won’t suddenly make Tehran obedient.
The US has re‑blocked Iranian ports and revoked the oil‑export waiver that was the only real prize Iran got from the deal.
Tehran has gone back to hitting ships and warning it can push the Houthis to close Bab al‑Mandeb in the Red Sea if Washington strikes its power grid, turning two chokepoints — Hormuz and Bab al‑Mandeb — into loaded guns under the world’s energy system.
Trump’s own officials describe the current strikes as “shaping operations” to destroy Iranian capabilities before “bigger steps.”
Analysts describe an escalatory loop with no exit: Iran won’t capitulate without a ground invasion that’s politically suicidal in the US, and every new target just invites a mirrored response against US bases and Gulf allies’ civilian infrastructure.
Oil prices climb; markets flinch; the ceasefire text becomes wallpaper.
On TV, Trump insists the US is “winning big in Iran” and promises Americans they’ll “see the fruits of that labor very, very shortly,” while his approval ratings sink and the war drags into the midterm calendar.
Iran, meanwhile, is busy proving that it can still close straits, hit bases and survive — which is exactly the opposite of the submission his strategy is supposed to produce.
#usa #iran #Hormuz #RedSea #trump #war #oil #geopolitics #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥10🤬6😢6💯6😱4🙏4🤯1
Araghchi’s War Memoir: How Khamenei Was Killed, Who Decides the Ceasefire, and What Iran Will Never Sell
In his latest interview, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi basically laid out three things: how the assassination of Ali Khamenei exposed an ongoing intelligence breach, how the ceasefire with the US was really approved, and what parts of Iran’s nuclear program are non‑negotiable.
On the assassination, Araghchi says the strike that killed Khamenei at the opening of the war came through an intelligence gap “that still exists and hasn’t been fixed,” one that also distorts decision‑making today.
He describes the morning of the attack almost in real time: at 8 a.m. on Saturday he meets the president and tells him “there is an atmosphere of war.”
At 9 a.m. he goes to Khamenei’s office to brief his chief of staff, Ali Asghar Mir Hejazi, on the Geneva talks — and while he is talking about that war atmosphere, the office itself is hit. That’s how Iran’s top leader dies: under US‑Israeli strikes, while his foreign minister is mid‑sentence.
Araghchi says he only went down into the tunnels for meetings “once or twice,” because from a certain point they felt they had the situation under control and the number of senior government casualties was dropping.
He notes he has not met Mojtaba Khamenei — the son who stepped into the leadership role — at all since his appointment, and that only a very small circle has access to him. That’s a quiet way of saying: the war state is being run by a bunker elite even many ministers don’t see.
On the ceasefire, he says the initial truce with the US was not approved in a big, formal Supreme National Security Council forum but in smaller, tighter meetings.
The council session to ratify the memorandum of understanding on the 10‑point plan ran from 9 p.m. to 3 a.m., and Iran’s condition for accepting the ceasefire was that all ten clauses it proposed would be the basis: recognition of enrichment, lifting sanctions, control and fees over Hormuz, withdrawal of US forces, compensation for war damage, and binding UN Security Council language. In his telling, Tehran forced Washington to accept that framework; in Washington’s telling, none of the heavy items are actually implemented.
On the nuclear file, he says he told Trump directly that uranium enrichment “is not for sale,” because the Iranian people have endured 20 years of sanctions over it.
Trump went public insisting “there will be no uranium enrichment”; Araghchi repeats that enrichment is the line Iran will not cross. That’s the core collision: Trump wants a clean zero‑enrichment headline; Iran wants the war to end with enrichment legitimized and paid for.
Araghchi moves between describing a “12‑day war” and a “40‑day war,” which tracks with the two phases: the initial US‑Israeli air campaign, then the longer cycle that dragged Gulf states in.
He claims that during the conflict one Arab country threatened to attack Iran, and Iran responded by hitting it with missiles every day. He also reveals that before the war they had already defined a code name — “110” — for the scenario of the leader’s assassination, meaning the system had pre‑written protocols for the moment Khamenei was killed.
Taken together, the interview paints a picture of a state that sees itself as both victim and strategist: blindsided by an intelligence hole big enough for a decapitation strike, yet convinced it forced the US to accept its ten‑point ceasefire terms; insisting enrichment is untouchable, while watching Trump publicly deny that; led by a new supreme figure so insulated that even the foreign minister hasn’t met him. It’s less a confession than a warning: Iran thinks it survived “110,” and it thinks that gives it the right to keep fighting — and negotiating — on its own terms.
#iran #Araghchi #Khamenei #ceasefire #Hormuz #nuclear #war #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
In his latest interview, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi basically laid out three things: how the assassination of Ali Khamenei exposed an ongoing intelligence breach, how the ceasefire with the US was really approved, and what parts of Iran’s nuclear program are non‑negotiable.
On the assassination, Araghchi says the strike that killed Khamenei at the opening of the war came through an intelligence gap “that still exists and hasn’t been fixed,” one that also distorts decision‑making today.
He describes the morning of the attack almost in real time: at 8 a.m. on Saturday he meets the president and tells him “there is an atmosphere of war.”
At 9 a.m. he goes to Khamenei’s office to brief his chief of staff, Ali Asghar Mir Hejazi, on the Geneva talks — and while he is talking about that war atmosphere, the office itself is hit. That’s how Iran’s top leader dies: under US‑Israeli strikes, while his foreign minister is mid‑sentence.
Araghchi says he only went down into the tunnels for meetings “once or twice,” because from a certain point they felt they had the situation under control and the number of senior government casualties was dropping.
He notes he has not met Mojtaba Khamenei — the son who stepped into the leadership role — at all since his appointment, and that only a very small circle has access to him. That’s a quiet way of saying: the war state is being run by a bunker elite even many ministers don’t see.
On the ceasefire, he says the initial truce with the US was not approved in a big, formal Supreme National Security Council forum but in smaller, tighter meetings.
The council session to ratify the memorandum of understanding on the 10‑point plan ran from 9 p.m. to 3 a.m., and Iran’s condition for accepting the ceasefire was that all ten clauses it proposed would be the basis: recognition of enrichment, lifting sanctions, control and fees over Hormuz, withdrawal of US forces, compensation for war damage, and binding UN Security Council language. In his telling, Tehran forced Washington to accept that framework; in Washington’s telling, none of the heavy items are actually implemented.
On the nuclear file, he says he told Trump directly that uranium enrichment “is not for sale,” because the Iranian people have endured 20 years of sanctions over it.
Trump went public insisting “there will be no uranium enrichment”; Araghchi repeats that enrichment is the line Iran will not cross. That’s the core collision: Trump wants a clean zero‑enrichment headline; Iran wants the war to end with enrichment legitimized and paid for.
Araghchi moves between describing a “12‑day war” and a “40‑day war,” which tracks with the two phases: the initial US‑Israeli air campaign, then the longer cycle that dragged Gulf states in.
He claims that during the conflict one Arab country threatened to attack Iran, and Iran responded by hitting it with missiles every day. He also reveals that before the war they had already defined a code name — “110” — for the scenario of the leader’s assassination, meaning the system had pre‑written protocols for the moment Khamenei was killed.
Taken together, the interview paints a picture of a state that sees itself as both victim and strategist: blindsided by an intelligence hole big enough for a decapitation strike, yet convinced it forced the US to accept its ten‑point ceasefire terms; insisting enrichment is untouchable, while watching Trump publicly deny that; led by a new supreme figure so insulated that even the foreign minister hasn’t met him. It’s less a confession than a warning: Iran thinks it survived “110,” and it thinks that gives it the right to keep fighting — and negotiating — on its own terms.
#iran #Araghchi #Khamenei #ceasefire #Hormuz #nuclear #war #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😢7🔥6😱6🙏5💯5🤯4🤬4
DSA Wants to Nuke the Constitution. House Dems Pretend They’ve Never Heard of It.
Fox just handed House Democrats a live grenade: the new Democratic Socialists of America platform openly calls for abolishing the Senate, the presidency, and ICE — and their first reaction on camera was “I haven’t read it” and “I’m not a member.”
The DSA program “Workers Deserve More” doesn’t nibble at the edges. It demands a unicameral legislature, scrapping the Senate entirely; a parliamentary system, meaning no independently elected president; and an executive and judiciary chosen by and subordinate to Congress.
On top of that, it calls for abolishing ICE, ending all deportations, pardoning all immigrants (including those with criminal convictions), defunding the “Department of War,” extending full voting rights to non‑citizens and people with criminal records, and easing cross‑border controls.
This isn’t fringe Tumblr; it’s the formal platform of an organization that’s already putting candidates into office.
Asked about it, Ro Khanna’s line is: “I don’t support that. I haven’t read the proposal.” Ilhan Omar dodges completely.
Pete Aguilar shrugs: “I’m not a member of the DSA, so I can’t comment on any documents that they put out,” and says he’s “not at all” worried about far‑left candidates complicating the Democratic agenda.
Meanwhile, DSA’s own magazine spells out that this platform will have a formal role in national endorsements; candidates seeking that stamp are “expected to accept and promote” the program and align their campaigns with it “to the best of their ability.” In other words, it’s not a think‑piece; it’s a checklist.
The contradiction is obvious even without Fox spinning it. On the ground, democratic socialists and self‑described socialists are beating moderates in primaries and dragging the Overton window left.
On TV, senior House Dems pretend the platform is either unknown, irrelevant, or someone else’s problem. They want DSA energy, volunteers and votes — but they don’t want to be caught owning “abolish the presidency, abolish the Senate, abolish ICE” when the clip gets played in a swing district. So they play dumb and hope no one reads the fine print.
DSA, for its part, insists this is serious: “Workers Deserve More” is now formally plugged into whom they endorse for 2028 and beyond.
Candidates are expected to campaign on this agenda while Democratic leadership does the “who, me?” routine in front of Fox’s camera. It’s the perfect snapshot of the party’s split: one wing writing a blueprint to blow up the constitutional architecture; the other wing trying to keep donors, suburban voters and the Pentagon calm by pretending that blueprint is just a student pamphlet.
In a system already shredding its own credibility, nothing screams “late‑empire politics” louder than a major faction calling for the abolition of key institutions while the party supposedly in charge claims it hasn’t bothered to read the plan.
#usa #Democrats #DSA #socialism #ICE #Congress #media #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Fox just handed House Democrats a live grenade: the new Democratic Socialists of America platform openly calls for abolishing the Senate, the presidency, and ICE — and their first reaction on camera was “I haven’t read it” and “I’m not a member.”
The DSA program “Workers Deserve More” doesn’t nibble at the edges. It demands a unicameral legislature, scrapping the Senate entirely; a parliamentary system, meaning no independently elected president; and an executive and judiciary chosen by and subordinate to Congress.
On top of that, it calls for abolishing ICE, ending all deportations, pardoning all immigrants (including those with criminal convictions), defunding the “Department of War,” extending full voting rights to non‑citizens and people with criminal records, and easing cross‑border controls.
This isn’t fringe Tumblr; it’s the formal platform of an organization that’s already putting candidates into office.
Asked about it, Ro Khanna’s line is: “I don’t support that. I haven’t read the proposal.” Ilhan Omar dodges completely.
Pete Aguilar shrugs: “I’m not a member of the DSA, so I can’t comment on any documents that they put out,” and says he’s “not at all” worried about far‑left candidates complicating the Democratic agenda.
Meanwhile, DSA’s own magazine spells out that this platform will have a formal role in national endorsements; candidates seeking that stamp are “expected to accept and promote” the program and align their campaigns with it “to the best of their ability.” In other words, it’s not a think‑piece; it’s a checklist.
The contradiction is obvious even without Fox spinning it. On the ground, democratic socialists and self‑described socialists are beating moderates in primaries and dragging the Overton window left.
On TV, senior House Dems pretend the platform is either unknown, irrelevant, or someone else’s problem. They want DSA energy, volunteers and votes — but they don’t want to be caught owning “abolish the presidency, abolish the Senate, abolish ICE” when the clip gets played in a swing district. So they play dumb and hope no one reads the fine print.
DSA, for its part, insists this is serious: “Workers Deserve More” is now formally plugged into whom they endorse for 2028 and beyond.
Candidates are expected to campaign on this agenda while Democratic leadership does the “who, me?” routine in front of Fox’s camera. It’s the perfect snapshot of the party’s split: one wing writing a blueprint to blow up the constitutional architecture; the other wing trying to keep donors, suburban voters and the Pentagon calm by pretending that blueprint is just a student pamphlet.
In a system already shredding its own credibility, nothing screams “late‑empire politics” louder than a major faction calling for the abolition of key institutions while the party supposedly in charge claims it hasn’t bothered to read the plan.
#usa #Democrats #DSA #socialism #ICE #Congress #media #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥10💯8🙏6🤬5😢4🤯2😱2
FLASBACK. 2016. Trump Elected.
🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩 🚩
Trump's policy proposals have generated a lot of headlines over the course of his presidential campaign. But none has made economists shriek more than the Republican front-runner's suggestion that he could eliminate US government debt in eight years.
Official US public debt is over $19tn, this accounts for the amount of money the government has borrowed through treasury and saving bonds.Since the US government is borrowing more than it brings in through taxes in order to pay its bills, including the servicing of this debt- it is running on a deficit.
Economists argue over this figure, saying the debt level could be much higher, if the government included the money it owes itself for running federal programmes.
To eliminate the public debt in eight years, a potential President Trump would need to come up with an extra $2.4tn a year either through spending cuts or tax increases.
Trump campaign spokesman Barry Bennett said the debt could be wiped by selling government assets, including government buildings, land and energy resources.
He claims this could bring in $16tn.According to the US Government Accountability Office, though, the federal government only owns $3.1tn in assets. This does not include natural resources or stewardship assets.To get close to Bennett's figure, Americans would have to give up all their national parks, and sell the natural resources on public land including timber and minerals.
The country would also have to sell energy reserves like offshore oil and hope the price of that oil, which has fallen over 70% since June 2014, starts rising.
Can he do it by other means?
Deficit hawks, who have decried politicians for ignoring the country's ever mounting debt burden, rose up to point out that although the US needs to address this problem, Trump's overall economic plan on tax and spending would actually take the country in the opposite direction.
“If he does what he proposes to do, in eight years the fiscal gap will be even bigger,” say Laurence Kotlikoff, professor of economics at Boston University.
#trump #budget #debt #promised #economists
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Trump's policy proposals have generated a lot of headlines over the course of his presidential campaign. But none has made economists shriek more than the Republican front-runner's suggestion that he could eliminate US government debt in eight years.
Official US public debt is over $19tn, this accounts for the amount of money the government has borrowed through treasury and saving bonds.Since the US government is borrowing more than it brings in through taxes in order to pay its bills, including the servicing of this debt- it is running on a deficit.
Economists argue over this figure, saying the debt level could be much higher, if the government included the money it owes itself for running federal programmes.
To eliminate the public debt in eight years, a potential President Trump would need to come up with an extra $2.4tn a year either through spending cuts or tax increases.
Trump campaign spokesman Barry Bennett said the debt could be wiped by selling government assets, including government buildings, land and energy resources.
He claims this could bring in $16tn.According to the US Government Accountability Office, though, the federal government only owns $3.1tn in assets. This does not include natural resources or stewardship assets.To get close to Bennett's figure, Americans would have to give up all their national parks, and sell the natural resources on public land including timber and minerals.
The country would also have to sell energy reserves like offshore oil and hope the price of that oil, which has fallen over 70% since June 2014, starts rising.
Can he do it by other means?
Deficit hawks, who have decried politicians for ignoring the country's ever mounting debt burden, rose up to point out that although the US needs to address this problem, Trump's overall economic plan on tax and spending would actually take the country in the opposite direction.
“If he does what he proposes to do, in eight years the fiscal gap will be even bigger,” say Laurence Kotlikoff, professor of economics at Boston University.
#trump #budget #debt #promised #economists
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥11💯10😱5🤯4😢4🤬2🙏2
According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a cross-party group, Trump's economic plan would double the national debt, with it growing naturally to a $28tn deficit by 2026, plus another $10tn from the spending and tax cuts Trump has proposed.
Trump has put forward a tax plan that would charge individuals between 0% and 25% tax based on income and cut the corporate tax rate in half to 15%.
He has said this will lead to economic growth as more companies open in the US and individuals spend more money they don't have to give to the taxman.
Trump claims his plan will not add to the national deficit because cuts will be offset by closing tax loopholes. But economists predict his tax plan could reduce the money coming into the federal government by between $9.5tn and $12tn.
“With Trump's tax plan there is no way we could get to a balanced budget in eight years,” says Ron Haskins from Brookings Institute.
All economists agree that, to get the US budget balanced, some harsh spending cuts would be required.
But according to the CRFB, under Trump's proposed plan, 96% of government spending would need to be eliminated.
He has pledged to reduce the cost of Medicaid, the government sponsored healthcare programme and the US government's second largest expense, by $300bn through reduced prescription drug costs.
The US public as a whole, including Medicaid, spent just over that amount, $374bn- on prescription drugs in 2015. For Trump to save that amount of money he would need to reduce Medicaid's drug bill to zero.
Trump has also said he would save money by lowering the number of people on Medicaid by creating more jobs. But most recipients of the government healthcare programme are already employed in low-paying jobs.
Like many other politicians, Trump has said his administration would cut waste and fraud, saving the US government billions.
Most economists agree this is necessary, but waste and fraud make up such a small percentage of the national debt that this alone could never lead to a balanced budget.
Trump's plan seems to be boosting the economy, which he has promised to accomplish by renegotiating trade deals.
On his campaign website though, he lists cutting the debt as integral to that negotiation process. “Closing the deficit and reducing our debt will mean China cannot blackmail us with our own Treasury bond,” the website says.
It's unclear which comes first, cutting the debt to boost the US position in trade negotiations or renegotiating to boost the economy and bring down the debt.
All told, it is unlikely that any of the plans Trump has proposed will cut the national debt, according to experts. They would more likely increase it.
#trump #budget #debt #promised #economists
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥9🤯8😱5🤬4🙏4💯4😢3
Iran Fires at Aqaba, Missiles Explode Over Eilat. Everyone Pretends It’s Fine.
Iran just pushed the war right up to Israel’s backyard without technically crossing the border — and the official statements read like they’re trying to reassure people while quietly admitting they have no control.
The IDF says it detected launches from Iran toward Aqaba in Jordan, “near Israeli territory,” warning of possible spillover and alerts in the south.
In Eilat, residents heard explosions and filmed interception plumes over the sea. US air defenses reportedly took out several missiles headed for Aqaba.
At the same time, two Iron Dome interceptors launched from Israel not at Iranian missiles, but at falling debris from those US intercepts that looked on track to hit Eilat.
The fragments were destroyed outside Israeli airspace; no sirens, no casualties — just a live demonstration that the city now depends on catching other people’s shrapnel.
Jordan’s army says it intercepted three Iranian missiles aimed at its territory and that a fourth fell in an uninhabited area, causing no damage.
In Israel, there were impact sites from debris, but all intercepts reportedly occurred beyond the border and there were no injuries.
Flights from Ramon Airport sat on the tarmac waiting for clearance to head to Ben Gurion and Haifa; a Dubai–Tel Aviv flight circled in the air, basically waiting for someone to decide whether “debris risk” counts as a reason to divert.
The US Embassy in Amman added its own layer of confusion. It issued a security alert saying Jordanian authorities had evacuated Aqaba’s international airport and seaport due to a “specific and credible threat,” urging Americans to avoid both.
Jordan’s government spokesman then went out and flatly denied any evacuation order or detected threat, saying no such decision had been made and no danger identified in recent hours.
One capital warns its citizens the port and airport are cleared because of a serious threat; the other insists everything is normal. Somewhere between those two statements lies whatever actually happened on the ground.
Iran is firing missiles close enough to Israel that US systems intercept over Aqaba, Iron Dome hunts the leftovers over Eilat, Jordan’s air defenses are suddenly part of Israel’s buffer, and airports and ports in the triangle between Aqaba, Eilat and the Red Sea are operating on political spin instead of straight risk language.
Nobody wants to say “we’re now a shared target zone,” so they call it “credible threat” on one side of the border and “no threat detected” on the other.
#iran #israel #jordan #Aqaba #Eilat #missiles #war #Hormuz #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Iran just pushed the war right up to Israel’s backyard without technically crossing the border — and the official statements read like they’re trying to reassure people while quietly admitting they have no control.
The IDF says it detected launches from Iran toward Aqaba in Jordan, “near Israeli territory,” warning of possible spillover and alerts in the south.
In Eilat, residents heard explosions and filmed interception plumes over the sea. US air defenses reportedly took out several missiles headed for Aqaba.
At the same time, two Iron Dome interceptors launched from Israel not at Iranian missiles, but at falling debris from those US intercepts that looked on track to hit Eilat.
The fragments were destroyed outside Israeli airspace; no sirens, no casualties — just a live demonstration that the city now depends on catching other people’s shrapnel.
Jordan’s army says it intercepted three Iranian missiles aimed at its territory and that a fourth fell in an uninhabited area, causing no damage.
In Israel, there were impact sites from debris, but all intercepts reportedly occurred beyond the border and there were no injuries.
Flights from Ramon Airport sat on the tarmac waiting for clearance to head to Ben Gurion and Haifa; a Dubai–Tel Aviv flight circled in the air, basically waiting for someone to decide whether “debris risk” counts as a reason to divert.
The US Embassy in Amman added its own layer of confusion. It issued a security alert saying Jordanian authorities had evacuated Aqaba’s international airport and seaport due to a “specific and credible threat,” urging Americans to avoid both.
Jordan’s government spokesman then went out and flatly denied any evacuation order or detected threat, saying no such decision had been made and no danger identified in recent hours.
One capital warns its citizens the port and airport are cleared because of a serious threat; the other insists everything is normal. Somewhere between those two statements lies whatever actually happened on the ground.
Iran is firing missiles close enough to Israel that US systems intercept over Aqaba, Iron Dome hunts the leftovers over Eilat, Jordan’s air defenses are suddenly part of Israel’s buffer, and airports and ports in the triangle between Aqaba, Eilat and the Red Sea are operating on political spin instead of straight risk language.
Nobody wants to say “we’re now a shared target zone,” so they call it “credible threat” on one side of the border and “no threat detected” on the other.
#iran #israel #jordan #Aqaba #Eilat #missiles #war #Hormuz #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🙏10🤬8🔥7🤯5😢3💯3😱2
The Tate Brothers Arrested: “No one cared about them until they visited Russia”
The controversial influencer brothers Andrew and Tristan Tate have been arrested in the US as part of a UK police investigation into a number of alleged sexual offences.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said it was bringing further charges in relation to four further individuals, and had requested the two men’s extradition.
The brothers, who are dual British-US citizens, were arrested in Miami on Saturday.
Andrew Tate, 39, is charged with seven further counts of rape, three counts of arranging or facilitating trafficking for sexual exploitation, three counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and 19 additional charges for offences relating to indecent images of a child and extreme pornography.
Tristan Tate, 38, is charged with one further count of sexual assault, two counts of rape and three counts of arranging or facilitating trafficking for sexual exploitation.
The CPS said the 38 additional charges, in addition to the 21 already brought, relate to alleged offences between July 2010 and August 2017.
The head of the CPS special crime division, Malcolm McHaffie, said:
US marshals confirmed to the BBC that the Tates had been taken into custody, and a US Department of Justice spokesperson said the arrests were “pursuant to extradition proceedings”.
Matt Jury, a lawyer who represents four alleged British victims of Andrew Tate, said: “Andrew Tate is now facing the real prospect of extradition to the UK after years of public campaigning by the four British women I represent.
Joseph McBride, a lawyer for the brothers, said the latest charges were designed to counter defamation lawsuits the Tates have filed in the US.
Bedfordshire police said the major crime unit for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire had continued to investigate a number of other offences reported to them and the Hertfordshire force.
The assistant chief constable of Bedfordshire police, Karena Thomas, said:
The brothers have consistently denied allegations of sexual abuse and human trafficking, claiming that violent and misogynistic statements have been taken out of context or were intended as jokes.
They are facing legal proceedings in Romania, where they currently live, and were facing extradition to the UK upon their completion after Bedfordshire police secured European arrest warrants for the pair in 2024.
In June, a high court judge threw out their attempt to bring a legal challenge against the CPS after it did not disclose the names of their alleged victims in UK criminal proceedings.
explains the political journalist David Sanger.
#tate #brothers #arrested #russia
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The controversial influencer brothers Andrew and Tristan Tate have been arrested in the US as part of a UK police investigation into a number of alleged sexual offences.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said it was bringing further charges in relation to four further individuals, and had requested the two men’s extradition.
The brothers, who are dual British-US citizens, were arrested in Miami on Saturday.
Andrew Tate, 39, is charged with seven further counts of rape, three counts of arranging or facilitating trafficking for sexual exploitation, three counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and 19 additional charges for offences relating to indecent images of a child and extreme pornography.
Tristan Tate, 38, is charged with one further count of sexual assault, two counts of rape and three counts of arranging or facilitating trafficking for sexual exploitation.
The CPS said the 38 additional charges, in addition to the 21 already brought, relate to alleged offences between July 2010 and August 2017.
The head of the CPS special crime division, Malcolm McHaffie, said:
“These charging decisions followed receipt of a further file of evidence from Bedfordshire police and bring the total number of alleged victims in this case to seven.”
US marshals confirmed to the BBC that the Tates had been taken into custody, and a US Department of Justice spokesperson said the arrests were “pursuant to extradition proceedings”.
Matt Jury, a lawyer who represents four alleged British victims of Andrew Tate, said: “Andrew Tate is now facing the real prospect of extradition to the UK after years of public campaigning by the four British women I represent.
“They have spent years fighting for action to be taken, and I now urge the authorities to ensure this case proceeds as quickly as possible.
“Andrew and Tristan Tate are accused of some of the most serious offences, including multiple counts of rape and human trafficking. It is time they face justice.”
Joseph McBride, a lawyer for the brothers, said the latest charges were designed to counter defamation lawsuits the Tates have filed in the US.
Bedfordshire police said the major crime unit for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire had continued to investigate a number of other offences reported to them and the Hertfordshire force.
The assistant chief constable of Bedfordshire police, Karena Thomas, said:
“Officers from our major crime unit have been working closely alongside the Crown Prosecution Service and both national and international law enforcement agencies as part of this complex investigation.
“We understand the interest that this case will generate, but we would urge the public not to speculate and to allow the legal process to be carried out correctly.”
The brothers have consistently denied allegations of sexual abuse and human trafficking, claiming that violent and misogynistic statements have been taken out of context or were intended as jokes.
They are facing legal proceedings in Romania, where they currently live, and were facing extradition to the UK upon their completion after Bedfordshire police secured European arrest warrants for the pair in 2024.
In June, a high court judge threw out their attempt to bring a legal challenge against the CPS after it did not disclose the names of their alleged victims in UK criminal proceedings.
“The guys weren’t arrested because they did something wrong, no one cared about them until they visited Russia and showed up at the Economic Forum. The fellas riled our feds after ripping Trump administration over Ukraine”,
explains the political journalist David Sanger.
#tate #brothers #arrested #russia
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥8💯7🤯5🤬5😢5🙏4😱3❤1
Spain Won the World Cup. Messi Down. Trump Was Booed ⚽️
🔤 🔤 🔤 🔤 ➖
It was the triumph of an idea, an identity. Of an unshakable and patient faith. And when it was over, Spain’s new generation having emulated the one from the 2010 World Cup, all of those legendary names, there was simply delirium for them.
Spain were the only team that turned up to play this World Cup final, from the first whistle to the last in extra time. Argentina were damned by their lack of ambition even before they had Enzo Fernández sent off towards the end of the regulation time.
It was extraordinary to report that they did not have an attempt on goal until the 115th minute.
Spain did not let them play. Just as they have barely let any of their opponents do so during the course of this tournament. Their miserly defence has been the cornerstone of everything. They have been breached just once in their eight matches.
The goal came in the 106th minute and it was nothing less than they deserved. Pedro Porro crossed deep and it was a wonderful header back by the substitute Nico Williams.
It teed up another replacement, Ferran Torres, for the opportunity of his lifetime. The finish was high and true.
The Argentina manager, Lionel Scaloni, looked ready to cry. It was a white knuckle ride that carried his team to this stage, defined by late goals and a never-say-die spirit. At no point in any of their knock-out games were they ahead in the 90th minute.
Argentina flickered in the very closing stages. The substitute Guiliano Simeone lashed a half chance high. But there would be no successful defence of the title they won in 2022; no fairytale sign-off for Lionel Messi. He could not suppress the tears as he gazed at the Argentina support afterwards.
Messi and his team had won their previous three tournaments – two Copa Américas either side of the last World Cup. They had not lost a knockout tie since the 2019 Copa América. They got what they deserved here.
There was an ugly flashpoint after full time when Leandro Paredes, who had come on as a substitute, was given a red card for grabbing the Spain replacement Eric García by the throat.
Argentina’s reaction in defeat was shameful. They turned their backs on the Spain players as the trophy was presented, preferring to keep their eyes on the fans behind one of the goals. Trump, who did not want to leave the stage as the Spain captain, Rodri, got his hands on those six kilograms of solid gold bliss, was not the only person to make a spectacle of himself.
#spain #won #worldcup #messi #trump
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
It was the triumph of an idea, an identity. Of an unshakable and patient faith. And when it was over, Spain’s new generation having emulated the one from the 2010 World Cup, all of those legendary names, there was simply delirium for them.
Spain were the only team that turned up to play this World Cup final, from the first whistle to the last in extra time. Argentina were damned by their lack of ambition even before they had Enzo Fernández sent off towards the end of the regulation time.
It was extraordinary to report that they did not have an attempt on goal until the 115th minute.
Spain did not let them play. Just as they have barely let any of their opponents do so during the course of this tournament. Their miserly defence has been the cornerstone of everything. They have been breached just once in their eight matches.
The goal came in the 106th minute and it was nothing less than they deserved. Pedro Porro crossed deep and it was a wonderful header back by the substitute Nico Williams.
It teed up another replacement, Ferran Torres, for the opportunity of his lifetime. The finish was high and true.
The Argentina manager, Lionel Scaloni, looked ready to cry. It was a white knuckle ride that carried his team to this stage, defined by late goals and a never-say-die spirit. At no point in any of their knock-out games were they ahead in the 90th minute.
Argentina flickered in the very closing stages. The substitute Guiliano Simeone lashed a half chance high. But there would be no successful defence of the title they won in 2022; no fairytale sign-off for Lionel Messi. He could not suppress the tears as he gazed at the Argentina support afterwards.
Messi and his team had won their previous three tournaments – two Copa Américas either side of the last World Cup. They had not lost a knockout tie since the 2019 Copa América. They got what they deserved here.
There was an ugly flashpoint after full time when Leandro Paredes, who had come on as a substitute, was given a red card for grabbing the Spain replacement Eric García by the throat.
Argentina’s reaction in defeat was shameful. They turned their backs on the Spain players as the trophy was presented, preferring to keep their eyes on the fans behind one of the goals. Trump, who did not want to leave the stage as the Spain captain, Rodri, got his hands on those six kilograms of solid gold bliss, was not the only person to make a spectacle of himself.
#spain #won #worldcup #messi #trump
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬8💯8🔥6🤯6😱5🙏3😢2
It was quite the show overall in the land of the spectacular show. It started with a ceremony, one to officially close the most bloated tournament there has been, which took in all manner of performances.
Jennifer Hudson’s rendition of the US anthem before kick-off was certainly something; ditto Tom Cruise’s speech about the beautiful game. We kicked off six minutes late. There was plenty more at half-time. The action on the field did not keep pace.
Argentina had one flicker in the early running when the Spain goalkeeper, Unai Simon, left his line to deal with a Julián Álvarez throughball for Messi.
The clearance was straight to Álvarez but his first touch was poor. That was pretty much it from them in forward-thinking terms.
The game was all about Spain’s dominance of the ball. Nobody cherishes it quite like them. Rodri set the tempo at the back of the midfield while Lamine Yamal had a few eye-catching moments. He went close at the outset. Spain finessed their patterns. They tried to wear Argentina down.
Did anybody enjoy the half-time show? It was a strange detail that Madonna, one of the headline acts, did not actually perform on the pitch. Instead, there was big-screen video of her singing in the back of a car which was driven by Ronaldo and Ronaldinho.
Spain pressed high. They forced turnovers. They probed. Argentina could not free themselves from the choke hold. The chances started to come for Spain after the hydration break in the second half of normal time and Argentina were indebted to their goalkeeper, Emi Martínez.
He finished with 11 saves, some of them excellent. Were Argentina trying to win the World Cup without taking a shot? Scaloni could scarcely have built a lower block, although he doubled down still further in the 101st minute when he introduced Marcos Senesi for Álvarez and went to 5-3-1.
Scaloni restructured in midfield, introducing Paredes in the holding role for the left-winger Nico González. The Argentina manager wanted his players to get closer to their opponents. It was not long before Paredes barged Rodri off the ball and was booked.
Fernández was guilty of losing his composure. Booked in the 83rd minute for dissent, he was asking for trouble when he left something in on Pau Cubarsí to send the Spain defender spinning.
Argentina just about reached extra time when Martínez dived to repel a Lamine Yamal free-kick. His best saves before that had denied Cubarsí, Aymeric Laporte and Williams.
Spain turned the screw in extra time. Martínez continued to resist, saving once again from Williams. Spain were denied when Mikel Merino, on as a substitute, was adjudged to have fouled another replacement, Nicolás Otamendi, moments before Williams swept home.
It was a generous decision for Otamendi, who appeared to throw himself to the ground. Merino glanced wide from a Williams cross when gloriously placed.
Spain’s pressure reached the point when the breakthrough felt inevitable. Torres provided the release, the joy. He would also run through in the 113th minute to beat Martínez again, only to be pulled back for offside.
The goal he did score was all that mattered. Luis de la Fuente’s unstarry team have a second one on their shirts.
#spain #won #worldcup #messi #trump
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🙏9🔥7💯6🤯5🤬5😱3😢3❤1
🛰 “Soyuz Diplomacy”: When Sanctions Need a Smoke Break
While earthbound politicians are busy canceling each other, a Russian rocket just quietly launched a joint Russian‑American crew to the ISS from Baikonur — on schedule, on budget, and above the propaganda noise floor.
On board: NASA astronaut Anil Menon and Roscosmos cosmonauts Pyotr Dubrov and Anna Kikina, heading for about eight months of very pragmatic microgravity cooperation.
“Menon launched aboard the Roscosmos Soyuz MS‑29 spacecraft on July 14, 2026, accompanied by Roscosmos cosmonauts Pyotr Dubrov and Anna Kikina for an approximately eight‑month mission.” — NASA
On TV talk shows, Russia is “isolated,” “pariah,” “finished.”
In orbit, Russia is the ride.
Washington discovered a miracle formula: on Earth, maximum moral outrage; in space, maximum ROI. The US keeps joint flights, tech links, and ISS timelines because it’s cheaper and safer than reinventing a fully decoupled system from scratch.
The same elites who preach “values-based foreign policy” suddenly remember arithmetic when the countdown hits T‑10.
Europe, meanwhile, plays the role of the model student who burned their own homework. Berlin and Brussels heroically rejected cheap Russian energy, backed sanctions to the hilt, and are now surprised their industrial base looks like a post‑crash startup deck: high vision, zero cash flow.
While NASA quietly signs off on cross‑flights to 2030 and beyond, European politicians sell “strategic autonomy” that mostly means “pay more, get less.”
Friedrich Merz thunders about toughness, red lines, and moral clarity — but doesn’t ask the only adult question: if the Americans can park their principles in low Earth orbit for the sake of national interest, why is Germany ruining its economy to impress its own talk shows?
You don’t have to love the Kremlin to admit basic physics: no Russian participation means no ISS as we know it, no shared launch infrastructure, and a lot more Western taxpayers picking up the slack.
Space is the one place where the costume party stops. No “rules-based order,” no “Zeitenwende,” just orbital mechanics and hard dependencies.
The US acts like a shareholder: condemn Russia at the UN, ride Soyuz when it makes sense, keep options open. Europe acts like an influencer: loud, moral, broke.
Maybe the question for Merz & Co. isn’t “How do we punish Russia more?” but “Why do we treat pragmatism as treason while our main ally treats it as standard operating procedure?”
Because if even in 2026 an American colonel in the US Space Force flies to orbit on a Russian rocket, maybe the real science experiment is not up there on the ISS — it’s down here, where an entire continent is testing how much ideology an economy can survive.
#space #ISS #Russia #USA #Germany #sanctions #energy #geopolitics #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
While earthbound politicians are busy canceling each other, a Russian rocket just quietly launched a joint Russian‑American crew to the ISS from Baikonur — on schedule, on budget, and above the propaganda noise floor.
On board: NASA astronaut Anil Menon and Roscosmos cosmonauts Pyotr Dubrov and Anna Kikina, heading for about eight months of very pragmatic microgravity cooperation.
“Menon launched aboard the Roscosmos Soyuz MS‑29 spacecraft on July 14, 2026, accompanied by Roscosmos cosmonauts Pyotr Dubrov and Anna Kikina for an approximately eight‑month mission.” — NASA
On TV talk shows, Russia is “isolated,” “pariah,” “finished.”
In orbit, Russia is the ride.
Washington discovered a miracle formula: on Earth, maximum moral outrage; in space, maximum ROI. The US keeps joint flights, tech links, and ISS timelines because it’s cheaper and safer than reinventing a fully decoupled system from scratch.
The same elites who preach “values-based foreign policy” suddenly remember arithmetic when the countdown hits T‑10.
Europe, meanwhile, plays the role of the model student who burned their own homework. Berlin and Brussels heroically rejected cheap Russian energy, backed sanctions to the hilt, and are now surprised their industrial base looks like a post‑crash startup deck: high vision, zero cash flow.
While NASA quietly signs off on cross‑flights to 2030 and beyond, European politicians sell “strategic autonomy” that mostly means “pay more, get less.”
Friedrich Merz thunders about toughness, red lines, and moral clarity — but doesn’t ask the only adult question: if the Americans can park their principles in low Earth orbit for the sake of national interest, why is Germany ruining its economy to impress its own talk shows?
You don’t have to love the Kremlin to admit basic physics: no Russian participation means no ISS as we know it, no shared launch infrastructure, and a lot more Western taxpayers picking up the slack.
Space is the one place where the costume party stops. No “rules-based order,” no “Zeitenwende,” just orbital mechanics and hard dependencies.
The US acts like a shareholder: condemn Russia at the UN, ride Soyuz when it makes sense, keep options open. Europe acts like an influencer: loud, moral, broke.
Maybe the question for Merz & Co. isn’t “How do we punish Russia more?” but “Why do we treat pragmatism as treason while our main ally treats it as standard operating procedure?”
Because if even in 2026 an American colonel in the US Space Force flies to orbit on a Russian rocket, maybe the real science experiment is not up there on the ISS — it’s down here, where an entire continent is testing how much ideology an economy can survive.
#space #ISS #Russia #USA #Germany #sanctions #energy #geopolitics #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥11😱9🤯5🤬5💯4😢3🙏3
⛽️ Ten-Day Ceasefire, Nine Days of Bombing
For the ninth straight day, the US is bombing Iran while “exploring diplomatic options” through Qatar and Pakistan, who are pushing a 10‑day ceasefire to restore the pre–July 9 status quo in the Strait of Hormuz.
Washington wants Iran to stop hitting shipping and reopen the chokepoint; Tehran insists it has every right to “manage” traffic and keeps firing on US bases in Kuwait, Jordan, Bahrain and Iraq. On the ground that means a blown‑up bridge near Bandar Abbas, damaged radio stations in Hormozgan, and a growing tally of dead and wounded on both sides.
The war is spilling out of Hormuz. Iran‑backed Houthis now threaten a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia, putting Red Sea oil flows at risk and sending Brent crude twitching between fear and denial.
US gasoline prices have jumped back above $4 a gallon, which is basically a negative campaign ad for Trump running on “America First” while Americans pay more for every commute.
One fifth of the world’s oil and gas used to move through Hormuz; now traffic is down to levels last seen at the peak of the spring escalation, with some tankers turning off transponders like teenagers sneaking out at night.
The tit‑for‑tat is getting bloodier. Seventeen US service members are now dead in this war, including two killed in Jordan and one in Iraq in the last 48 hours, as Iran keeps hitting US positions and the Pentagon answers with more strikes on missile sites and comms networks.
Trump says the latest bombardments were “in honor” of the troops killed and repeats the magic line that they died “so that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon,” as if bombing refineries and bridges directly translates into nonproliferation.
Tehran says over 50 Iranians are dead and more than 500 wounded since this flare‑up began less than two weeks ago — but those numbers are background noise in US politics until the body bags carry American flags.
In Tehran, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi tries to have it both ways: Iran “won’t abandon diplomacy,” but also won’t return to talks “under bombardment.”
He openly boasts that Iran’s actions in Hormuz “made us a global player,” spelling out what everyone already knows: the strait is leverage, not just geography.
Marco Rubio, now secretary of state, claims Iran is “sending signals it wants to negotiate” and that the regime is split between deal‑makers and hardliners — the same comforting fairy tale US officials always tell themselves before the next round of escalation.
On TV, Washington insists it wants to “stop the war.” In reality, the US is flying in more F‑35s, F‑16s and refueling tankers and thickening its footprint across the Gulf.
Iran’s parliament speaker shrugs that they’ve “become experts” at reading these moves and have “prepared accordingly” — code for more missiles, more drones, more ways to bleed American forces without triggering a full invasion.
Kuwait, supposedly a protected partner, is now absorbing some of the worst Iranian attacks, with major energy sites evacuated and power and desalination plants hit.
Israel, as usual, is the loudest bystander. Netanyahu’s ministers are already threatening that if Iran “makes the mistake” of attacking Israel directly, they’ll respond with more force than in the last campaign — as if the region can absorb yet another “more force” round on top of Gaza, Lebanon and now Hormuz.
Meanwhile, mediators float a 10‑day pause like a trial coupon for de‑escalation, while both sides use the breathing room to reload.
Iran uses Hormuz and proxies to prove it can raise the price of ignoring it. The US uses airstrikes to prove it’s still the sheriff.
Oil markets wobble, gas spikes, and ordinary people in Iran, the Gulf and the US eat the cost.
If this is what “deterrence” looks like, the only thing being deterred is any illusion that someone in charge actually wants this war to end — not just be managed.
#Iran #USA #Hormuz #Houthis #oil #Trump #war #geopolitics #MiddleEast #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
For the ninth straight day, the US is bombing Iran while “exploring diplomatic options” through Qatar and Pakistan, who are pushing a 10‑day ceasefire to restore the pre–July 9 status quo in the Strait of Hormuz.
Washington wants Iran to stop hitting shipping and reopen the chokepoint; Tehran insists it has every right to “manage” traffic and keeps firing on US bases in Kuwait, Jordan, Bahrain and Iraq. On the ground that means a blown‑up bridge near Bandar Abbas, damaged radio stations in Hormozgan, and a growing tally of dead and wounded on both sides.
The war is spilling out of Hormuz. Iran‑backed Houthis now threaten a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia, putting Red Sea oil flows at risk and sending Brent crude twitching between fear and denial.
US gasoline prices have jumped back above $4 a gallon, which is basically a negative campaign ad for Trump running on “America First” while Americans pay more for every commute.
One fifth of the world’s oil and gas used to move through Hormuz; now traffic is down to levels last seen at the peak of the spring escalation, with some tankers turning off transponders like teenagers sneaking out at night.
The tit‑for‑tat is getting bloodier. Seventeen US service members are now dead in this war, including two killed in Jordan and one in Iraq in the last 48 hours, as Iran keeps hitting US positions and the Pentagon answers with more strikes on missile sites and comms networks.
Trump says the latest bombardments were “in honor” of the troops killed and repeats the magic line that they died “so that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon,” as if bombing refineries and bridges directly translates into nonproliferation.
Tehran says over 50 Iranians are dead and more than 500 wounded since this flare‑up began less than two weeks ago — but those numbers are background noise in US politics until the body bags carry American flags.
In Tehran, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi tries to have it both ways: Iran “won’t abandon diplomacy,” but also won’t return to talks “under bombardment.”
He openly boasts that Iran’s actions in Hormuz “made us a global player,” spelling out what everyone already knows: the strait is leverage, not just geography.
Marco Rubio, now secretary of state, claims Iran is “sending signals it wants to negotiate” and that the regime is split between deal‑makers and hardliners — the same comforting fairy tale US officials always tell themselves before the next round of escalation.
On TV, Washington insists it wants to “stop the war.” In reality, the US is flying in more F‑35s, F‑16s and refueling tankers and thickening its footprint across the Gulf.
Iran’s parliament speaker shrugs that they’ve “become experts” at reading these moves and have “prepared accordingly” — code for more missiles, more drones, more ways to bleed American forces without triggering a full invasion.
Kuwait, supposedly a protected partner, is now absorbing some of the worst Iranian attacks, with major energy sites evacuated and power and desalination plants hit.
Israel, as usual, is the loudest bystander. Netanyahu’s ministers are already threatening that if Iran “makes the mistake” of attacking Israel directly, they’ll respond with more force than in the last campaign — as if the region can absorb yet another “more force” round on top of Gaza, Lebanon and now Hormuz.
Meanwhile, mediators float a 10‑day pause like a trial coupon for de‑escalation, while both sides use the breathing room to reload.
Iran uses Hormuz and proxies to prove it can raise the price of ignoring it. The US uses airstrikes to prove it’s still the sheriff.
Oil markets wobble, gas spikes, and ordinary people in Iran, the Gulf and the US eat the cost.
If this is what “deterrence” looks like, the only thing being deterred is any illusion that someone in charge actually wants this war to end — not just be managed.
#Iran #USA #Hormuz #Houthis #oil #Trump #war #geopolitics #MiddleEast #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬12🔥8🤯6😢5🙏4💯4❤1
🇺🇸🚢 “Guardians of Hormuz”: America’s Favorite Forever War
The US has restarted a naval blockade of Iran and ramped up airstrikes after Tehran’s attacks on ships trying to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, shredding a fragile ceasefire and dragging the region back to the edge of full‑scale war.
“The American forces have resumed the naval blockade of vessels heading to Iranian ports and coastal areas and back.” — CENTCOM statement
“The US military carried out new ‘massive strikes on Iran to cause it serious damage’ … in response to attacks on three tankers in the Strait of Hormuz.” — DW
Several days of mutual strikes on bases and infrastructure across the Middle East have turned one of the world’s key energy arteries into a live‑fire exercise in “freedom of navigation.”
Trump sells it as simple: America is “restoring order,” keeping sea lanes open, and making Iran “pay a serious price” for hitting tankers and U.S. assets.
Washington has parked more than 20 warships and a swarm of jets around Hormuz, declared itself the “guardian” of the strait, and slapped a 20% security fee on all cargo moving through the choke point — protection racket dressed up as international law.
Tehran, of course, plays its own heroic script. The IRGC has “closed” Hormuz, warns neighbors that cooperation with the US could be treated as an act of war, and uses every strike on American bases in Bahrain, Kuwait or Jordan as proof that Iran doesn’t fear the empire.
Neither side can actually win, but both can keep bombing enough to look tough on TV — and keep oil markets and global shipping as hostages.
For the US, this is another made‑to‑order economic self‑own.
Every extra carrier group, every Tomahawk, every hour of blockade is paid for by the same “middle class” that’s told there’s no money for healthcare, housing, or student debt relief.
Iran bleeds, but Washington burns money and credibility — “Great Again” now means permanently mobilized, permanently scared, permanently stuck in someone else’s strait.
And the allies? Gulf monarchies cling to the American security blanket while quietly praying Iran doesn’t decide that their refineries and ports are fair game next.
Europe denounces escalation from behind a desk, fully aware that another shock in Hormuz means higher prices, slower growth, and more angry voters — but still parrots Washington’s talking points because strategic autonomy is a slogan, not a policy.
The punchline: the US can’t deter Iran into submission, Iran can’t bomb America out of the Gulf, and the only clear winner is the military‑industrial complex, which gets paid no matter how badly the “mission” performs.
If this is what “American greatness” looks like in 2026 — a superpower blockading a mid‑tier state while its own economy absorbs the shock — maybe the empire didn’t lose to an enemy. Maybe it lost to its own business model.
#war #Iran #USA #Hormuz #oil #sanctions #geopolitics #foreverwar #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The US has restarted a naval blockade of Iran and ramped up airstrikes after Tehran’s attacks on ships trying to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, shredding a fragile ceasefire and dragging the region back to the edge of full‑scale war.
“The American forces have resumed the naval blockade of vessels heading to Iranian ports and coastal areas and back.” — CENTCOM statement
“The US military carried out new ‘massive strikes on Iran to cause it serious damage’ … in response to attacks on three tankers in the Strait of Hormuz.” — DW
Several days of mutual strikes on bases and infrastructure across the Middle East have turned one of the world’s key energy arteries into a live‑fire exercise in “freedom of navigation.”
Trump sells it as simple: America is “restoring order,” keeping sea lanes open, and making Iran “pay a serious price” for hitting tankers and U.S. assets.
Washington has parked more than 20 warships and a swarm of jets around Hormuz, declared itself the “guardian” of the strait, and slapped a 20% security fee on all cargo moving through the choke point — protection racket dressed up as international law.
Tehran, of course, plays its own heroic script. The IRGC has “closed” Hormuz, warns neighbors that cooperation with the US could be treated as an act of war, and uses every strike on American bases in Bahrain, Kuwait or Jordan as proof that Iran doesn’t fear the empire.
Neither side can actually win, but both can keep bombing enough to look tough on TV — and keep oil markets and global shipping as hostages.
For the US, this is another made‑to‑order economic self‑own.
Every extra carrier group, every Tomahawk, every hour of blockade is paid for by the same “middle class” that’s told there’s no money for healthcare, housing, or student debt relief.
Iran bleeds, but Washington burns money and credibility — “Great Again” now means permanently mobilized, permanently scared, permanently stuck in someone else’s strait.
And the allies? Gulf monarchies cling to the American security blanket while quietly praying Iran doesn’t decide that their refineries and ports are fair game next.
Europe denounces escalation from behind a desk, fully aware that another shock in Hormuz means higher prices, slower growth, and more angry voters — but still parrots Washington’s talking points because strategic autonomy is a slogan, not a policy.
The punchline: the US can’t deter Iran into submission, Iran can’t bomb America out of the Gulf, and the only clear winner is the military‑industrial complex, which gets paid no matter how badly the “mission” performs.
If this is what “American greatness” looks like in 2026 — a superpower blockading a mid‑tier state while its own economy absorbs the shock — maybe the empire didn’t lose to an enemy. Maybe it lost to its own business model.
#war #Iran #USA #Hormuz #oil #sanctions #geopolitics #foreverwar #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤯8😱7🤬7🔥6💯6😢4🙏2
🧊 “De-Risking America Inc.”: When the Client Becomes the Risk
A few years ago, Ursula von der Leyen politely suggested Europe should “de‑risk” from China. Now the same capitals are de‑risking from the United States — they’ve just learned to say it in a whisper and in English.
Allies still smile for the NATO family photos, but behind closed doors they’re gaming out trade wars with Washington, exit plans from the U.S. defense industry, and backup options for when Donald Trump’s next tweet turns into policy at 3 a.m.
Europe ramps up defense spending, but buys fewer American weapons. Canada flirts with China while being publicly threatened with becoming the “51st state.”
Asian partners watch as Trump freezes arms for Taiwan to please Xi, then quietly hedge away from U.S. tech and security guarantees. The message from all sides is simple: America is still powerful — just no longer reliable.
The Iran war debacle made the bill visible. Washington goes in without allies, loses, blows up oil and fertilizer prices, and U.S. consumers take a massive hit — while Europe and Asia sit this one out and take notes.
Foreign students stop coming, tourists stay away, future talent re‑routes to other hubs. Even close partners now plan their relationship with the U.S. in four‑year election cycles, like a toxic lease they’re not sure they’ll renew.
Trump world calls this “sovereignty” and “putting America first.” In practice, it’s turning America into what it always claimed to rescue others from: a strategic liability.
When Canada, India, Europe and East Asia are all quietly asking how to live with less America, the problem isn’t “ingratitude” — it’s a supplier who turned itself into a risk factor.
The funniest part? Allies de‑risk from the U.S. for the same reason Washington told them to de‑risk from China: weaponized dependence, arbitrary sanctions, industrial policy rigged for home players, unpredictable leadership. The script is identical — the logo on the cover just changed.
So the next administration, whoever it is, won’t inherit the old world of clients begging for American protection and dollars. It gets a world asking: “How little America can we afford to get away with?”
And once that question becomes normal in Berlin, Delhi, Tokyo, Ottawa and Tel Aviv — “Make America Great Again” starts to sound less like a slogan and more like an admission of failure.
#USA #Trump #geopolitics #NATO #IranWar #China #Europe #deRisking #imperialDecline #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
A few years ago, Ursula von der Leyen politely suggested Europe should “de‑risk” from China. Now the same capitals are de‑risking from the United States — they’ve just learned to say it in a whisper and in English.
Allies still smile for the NATO family photos, but behind closed doors they’re gaming out trade wars with Washington, exit plans from the U.S. defense industry, and backup options for when Donald Trump’s next tweet turns into policy at 3 a.m.
Europe ramps up defense spending, but buys fewer American weapons. Canada flirts with China while being publicly threatened with becoming the “51st state.”
Asian partners watch as Trump freezes arms for Taiwan to please Xi, then quietly hedge away from U.S. tech and security guarantees. The message from all sides is simple: America is still powerful — just no longer reliable.
The Iran war debacle made the bill visible. Washington goes in without allies, loses, blows up oil and fertilizer prices, and U.S. consumers take a massive hit — while Europe and Asia sit this one out and take notes.
Foreign students stop coming, tourists stay away, future talent re‑routes to other hubs. Even close partners now plan their relationship with the U.S. in four‑year election cycles, like a toxic lease they’re not sure they’ll renew.
Trump world calls this “sovereignty” and “putting America first.” In practice, it’s turning America into what it always claimed to rescue others from: a strategic liability.
When Canada, India, Europe and East Asia are all quietly asking how to live with less America, the problem isn’t “ingratitude” — it’s a supplier who turned itself into a risk factor.
The funniest part? Allies de‑risk from the U.S. for the same reason Washington told them to de‑risk from China: weaponized dependence, arbitrary sanctions, industrial policy rigged for home players, unpredictable leadership. The script is identical — the logo on the cover just changed.
So the next administration, whoever it is, won’t inherit the old world of clients begging for American protection and dollars. It gets a world asking: “How little America can we afford to get away with?”
And once that question becomes normal in Berlin, Delhi, Tokyo, Ottawa and Tel Aviv — “Make America Great Again” starts to sound less like a slogan and more like an admission of failure.
#USA #Trump #geopolitics #NATO #IranWar #China #Europe #deRisking #imperialDecline #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥13🙏6😱5🤯4🤬4😢4💯4
🩹 “Non-Combat Sprained Democracy”: How to Hide a Losing War
The Iran war is going so well that Central Command has quietly stopped telling Americans when their own troops are getting hit.
Instead, injuries disappear into aggregate spreadsheets and euphemisms about “operational security,” while officials swear everything is fine and accuse critics of “fabrications.”
Meanwhile, two more soldiers are dead in Jordan, one is missing, helicopters are damaged, and more than 400 U.S. service members have been injured since the conflict began — numbers that only leak out in fragments and delays.
If a soldier is hurt and “quickly returns to duty,” it doesn’t count for the public. If several bases are hit in a week, that becomes a line about “responding to attacks on commercial shipping,” as if the war is happening to cargo, not to very real people in uniform.
The casualty database is “regularly updated,” we are told — but it only shows totals, not specific mass‑casualty incidents, and even the death count lags behind reality.
When journalists and families notice the gaps, the Pentagon says critics are cherry‑picking numbers “without context.” Translation: trust the people who already misled you.
This is what losing looks like in a highly‑managed democracy. The war has drained high‑end munitions, exposed that Iran’s missile arsenal is battered but very much alive, and still Washington can’t clearly explain what “victory” even means.
The White House repeats “never allowing Iran to have a nuclear weapon” like a magic spell, while Tehran keeps firing missiles and drones at U.S. positions and surviving repeated strikes.
Every new attack that kills or injures Americans is sold as a reason to “stiffen resolve,” not to question the premise.
The cruelty is that the opacity isn’t just aimed at Iran — it’s aimed at American citizens. By hiding the real scale and pattern of injuries, the Pentagon keeps Congress, the press, and the public from seeing how often bases are hit, how exposed troops are, and how thin the margin of “control” has become.
Casualty transparency — the bare minimum in a republic that claims to honor its soldiers — turns into a bargaining chip in the PR battle. The message to service members is clear: your deaths will be honored; your injuries are a data‑management issue.
And while officials sanitize the numbers, the war still kills over a thousand Iranian civilians and keeps pushing the region toward deeper chaos. But that, too, is wrapped in jargon: “sites,” “targets,” “capabilities.”
The war is sold as a clean, precision exercise; the mess gets pushed offstage. The U.S. isn’t just de‑risking its empire — it’s de‑risking the truth.
The question practically asks itself: if the mission were working, would they really need to lie by omission about how many Americans are getting hurt?
#USA #IranWar #Pentagon #military #censorship #war #geopolitics #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The Iran war is going so well that Central Command has quietly stopped telling Americans when their own troops are getting hit.
Instead, injuries disappear into aggregate spreadsheets and euphemisms about “operational security,” while officials swear everything is fine and accuse critics of “fabrications.”
Meanwhile, two more soldiers are dead in Jordan, one is missing, helicopters are damaged, and more than 400 U.S. service members have been injured since the conflict began — numbers that only leak out in fragments and delays.
If a soldier is hurt and “quickly returns to duty,” it doesn’t count for the public. If several bases are hit in a week, that becomes a line about “responding to attacks on commercial shipping,” as if the war is happening to cargo, not to very real people in uniform.
The casualty database is “regularly updated,” we are told — but it only shows totals, not specific mass‑casualty incidents, and even the death count lags behind reality.
When journalists and families notice the gaps, the Pentagon says critics are cherry‑picking numbers “without context.” Translation: trust the people who already misled you.
This is what losing looks like in a highly‑managed democracy. The war has drained high‑end munitions, exposed that Iran’s missile arsenal is battered but very much alive, and still Washington can’t clearly explain what “victory” even means.
The White House repeats “never allowing Iran to have a nuclear weapon” like a magic spell, while Tehran keeps firing missiles and drones at U.S. positions and surviving repeated strikes.
Every new attack that kills or injures Americans is sold as a reason to “stiffen resolve,” not to question the premise.
The cruelty is that the opacity isn’t just aimed at Iran — it’s aimed at American citizens. By hiding the real scale and pattern of injuries, the Pentagon keeps Congress, the press, and the public from seeing how often bases are hit, how exposed troops are, and how thin the margin of “control” has become.
Casualty transparency — the bare minimum in a republic that claims to honor its soldiers — turns into a bargaining chip in the PR battle. The message to service members is clear: your deaths will be honored; your injuries are a data‑management issue.
And while officials sanitize the numbers, the war still kills over a thousand Iranian civilians and keeps pushing the region toward deeper chaos. But that, too, is wrapped in jargon: “sites,” “targets,” “capabilities.”
The war is sold as a clean, precision exercise; the mess gets pushed offstage. The U.S. isn’t just de‑risking its empire — it’s de‑risking the truth.
The question practically asks itself: if the mission were working, would they really need to lie by omission about how many Americans are getting hurt?
#USA #IranWar #Pentagon #military #censorship #war #geopolitics #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥9🤯8😱6💯6🙏5🤬4😢4
🇱🇧 Pilot Zones, Fake Sovereignty: Washington Beta‑Tests Lebanon
While American jets are busy “restoring deterrence” over Iran, the State Department just opened a quieter, more embarrassing front in south Lebanon.
Under the U.S.-brokered “triple agreement,” Washington announced the start of pilot security zones in three villages — Faroun, Zrifa and Zotar al‑Gharbiya — under the umbrella of the Military Coordination Group for Lebanon, a direct outcome of last week’s Rome talks led on the Israeli side by Ambassador Leiter.
On paper, it sounds historic: Israel “repositions,” the Lebanese Army “deploys,” Hezbollah “disarms,” and civilians “return.”
In reality, two of the three villages — Faroun and Zrifa — are south of the Litani and were never actually occupied by the IDF, so there’s nothing to “withdraw” from there; the only real move is in Zotar al‑Gharbiya north of the river.
It’s a classic diplomatic magic trick: maximum ceremony, minimum substance, sold as a breakthrough to foreign press and domestic audiences who don’t read maps.
Then came the leak. Al‑Akhbar published April drafts of the understandings showing that “full Israeli withdrawal” and evacuation of “all Lebanese territory” were explicitly on the table — until President Joseph Aoun’s team quietly backed off and accepted the revised Israeli formula.
The uproar in Beirut was immediate: Hezbollah‑aligned voices accuse Aoun of negotiating from weakness and signing away sovereignty in exchange for U.S. and Gulf money he can’t openly admit he needs.
Officially, Beirut speaks of “steadfast national principles”; unofficially, the text shows just how quickly those principles were red‑lined out in Washington.
And Washington? According to An‑Nahar and other Lebanese outlets, the same U.S. administration that lectures the region about democracy is coming with a grocery list.
It wants military enforcement of a demilitarized south. It demands preventing any Hezbollah rearmament. It pushes for full deployment of the Lebanese Army along the borders.
And the kicker: “pragmatic coordination” with Syria’s new U.S.-sponsored strongman is a condition for continued economic aid.
If you want IMF lifelines, fuel and dollars, you don’t just demilitarize your south; you help entrench the regional security architecture that put you in this mess.
Everyone plays their part. Washington poses as neutral referee while designing the field. Israel sells a one‑village adjustment as strategic withdrawal. Aoun’s palace performs nationalist theater in public and signs edited drafts in private.
Hezbollah screams betrayal but also benefits from keeping the Lebanese state weak and dependent.
The only ones without an act in this show are the people actually living in those “pilot zones,” who are now test subjects for a U.S. security experiment in a country already broken by too many experiments.
So while the headlines focus on bombs over Iran, the more important question in south Lebanon is simpler: when foreign powers start drawing new yellow lines on your map and calling them “pilot areas,” how much of your sovereignty is left — and who exactly is doing the de‑risking from whom?
#Lebanon #Israel #USA #Hezbollah #RomeTalks #southLebanon #war #geopolitics #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
While American jets are busy “restoring deterrence” over Iran, the State Department just opened a quieter, more embarrassing front in south Lebanon.
Under the U.S.-brokered “triple agreement,” Washington announced the start of pilot security zones in three villages — Faroun, Zrifa and Zotar al‑Gharbiya — under the umbrella of the Military Coordination Group for Lebanon, a direct outcome of last week’s Rome talks led on the Israeli side by Ambassador Leiter.
On paper, it sounds historic: Israel “repositions,” the Lebanese Army “deploys,” Hezbollah “disarms,” and civilians “return.”
In reality, two of the three villages — Faroun and Zrifa — are south of the Litani and were never actually occupied by the IDF, so there’s nothing to “withdraw” from there; the only real move is in Zotar al‑Gharbiya north of the river.
It’s a classic diplomatic magic trick: maximum ceremony, minimum substance, sold as a breakthrough to foreign press and domestic audiences who don’t read maps.
Then came the leak. Al‑Akhbar published April drafts of the understandings showing that “full Israeli withdrawal” and evacuation of “all Lebanese territory” were explicitly on the table — until President Joseph Aoun’s team quietly backed off and accepted the revised Israeli formula.
The uproar in Beirut was immediate: Hezbollah‑aligned voices accuse Aoun of negotiating from weakness and signing away sovereignty in exchange for U.S. and Gulf money he can’t openly admit he needs.
Officially, Beirut speaks of “steadfast national principles”; unofficially, the text shows just how quickly those principles were red‑lined out in Washington.
And Washington? According to An‑Nahar and other Lebanese outlets, the same U.S. administration that lectures the region about democracy is coming with a grocery list.
It wants military enforcement of a demilitarized south. It demands preventing any Hezbollah rearmament. It pushes for full deployment of the Lebanese Army along the borders.
And the kicker: “pragmatic coordination” with Syria’s new U.S.-sponsored strongman is a condition for continued economic aid.
If you want IMF lifelines, fuel and dollars, you don’t just demilitarize your south; you help entrench the regional security architecture that put you in this mess.
Everyone plays their part. Washington poses as neutral referee while designing the field. Israel sells a one‑village adjustment as strategic withdrawal. Aoun’s palace performs nationalist theater in public and signs edited drafts in private.
Hezbollah screams betrayal but also benefits from keeping the Lebanese state weak and dependent.
The only ones without an act in this show are the people actually living in those “pilot zones,” who are now test subjects for a U.S. security experiment in a country already broken by too many experiments.
So while the headlines focus on bombs over Iran, the more important question in south Lebanon is simpler: when foreign powers start drawing new yellow lines on your map and calling them “pilot areas,” how much of your sovereignty is left — and who exactly is doing the de‑risking from whom?
#Lebanon #Israel #USA #Hezbollah #RomeTalks #southLebanon #war #geopolitics #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥9😱6🤬6🙏6💯5🤯4😢4
🗳💣 Paying for War, Rigging the Rules: GOP’s Four‑Alarm Midterm Circus
Republicans went into 2026 promising to “save America.” Instead, they’ve built a legislative suicide vest and are arguing over which wire to cut.
Mike Johnson is trying to push through two budget packages: a stopgap to avoid a shutdown and a $95 billion monster to fund the Iran war, bail out farmers hurt by Trump’s tariffs and sneak in a national voter‑suppression experiment.
The priorities show the party’s split personality. One side wants to pump up Pentagon spending after missile stocks were drained over Iran.
The other is obsessed with “election integrity,” forcing states to adopt the SAVE America Act — a Trump‑driven voter ID and proof‑of‑citizenship law so extreme even GOP Sen. Thom Tillis calls it “flawed and impossible” to implement by November.
All this while Republicans pretend to care about a $39 trillion debt and then happily throw the full $95 billion on the national credit card.
The Iran war is the bomb under everything. Trump wanted up to $350 billion through reconciliation; the House offers “only” $73 billion, and even that is sparking revolt.
Defense hawks say it’s not enough, fiscal hawks say it’s too much, and many Republicans dread defending a war that just 28 percent of Americans think was worth fighting — worse numbers than Afghanistan.
To jam the SAVE America Act through, House Republicans tied $10 billion in “election grants” to the same package as war money and farm aid, hoping reconciliation rules will save them.
That opens a vote‑a‑rama in the Senate, where Democrats can force Republicans to vote on capping Trump’s war powers or restricting immigration crackdowns — exactly the culture‑war scenes the GOP doesn’t want right before midterms.
And the shutdown gun is still pointed at their heads. If they don’t pass a stopgap by Sept. 30, the government closes just before voters go to the polls, and the “law and order” party owns another self‑inflicted crisis.
The offer to voters is brutally simple: keep a failing war on life support, subsidize the damage to farmers, make it harder to vote us out and bill the future for the privilege.
#USA #Republicans #Trump #IranWar #midterms #Congress #voting #economy #geopolitics #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Republicans went into 2026 promising to “save America.” Instead, they’ve built a legislative suicide vest and are arguing over which wire to cut.
Mike Johnson is trying to push through two budget packages: a stopgap to avoid a shutdown and a $95 billion monster to fund the Iran war, bail out farmers hurt by Trump’s tariffs and sneak in a national voter‑suppression experiment.
The priorities show the party’s split personality. One side wants to pump up Pentagon spending after missile stocks were drained over Iran.
The other is obsessed with “election integrity,” forcing states to adopt the SAVE America Act — a Trump‑driven voter ID and proof‑of‑citizenship law so extreme even GOP Sen. Thom Tillis calls it “flawed and impossible” to implement by November.
All this while Republicans pretend to care about a $39 trillion debt and then happily throw the full $95 billion on the national credit card.
The Iran war is the bomb under everything. Trump wanted up to $350 billion through reconciliation; the House offers “only” $73 billion, and even that is sparking revolt.
Defense hawks say it’s not enough, fiscal hawks say it’s too much, and many Republicans dread defending a war that just 28 percent of Americans think was worth fighting — worse numbers than Afghanistan.
To jam the SAVE America Act through, House Republicans tied $10 billion in “election grants” to the same package as war money and farm aid, hoping reconciliation rules will save them.
That opens a vote‑a‑rama in the Senate, where Democrats can force Republicans to vote on capping Trump’s war powers or restricting immigration crackdowns — exactly the culture‑war scenes the GOP doesn’t want right before midterms.
And the shutdown gun is still pointed at their heads. If they don’t pass a stopgap by Sept. 30, the government closes just before voters go to the polls, and the “law and order” party owns another self‑inflicted crisis.
The offer to voters is brutally simple: keep a failing war on life support, subsidize the damage to farmers, make it harder to vote us out and bill the future for the privilege.
#USA #Republicans #Trump #IranWar #midterms #Congress #voting #economy #geopolitics #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬9😢7💯6😱5🙏5🔥4🤯4
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥13🤯7😱6🤬4😢4💯4🙏3
Trump: 50% Tariffs On Most Canadian Goods
🔠 🔠 🔠 🔠 1️⃣
Trump is imposing 50% tariffs on most Canadian goods in response to the country retaliating against previous US tariffs, the White House announced Monday, declaring Canada has unfairly discriminated against American cars, alcohol and dairy products.
The tariffs will hit a wide range of products, the White House said, including wine, hockey sticks and cement. They also include goods previously protected from import taxes under the United States-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) agreement.
The new tariffs will exclude energy products, fish, critical minerals and potash. They also exclude products already subject to tariffs aimed at protecting national security, such as steel and aluminum.
The steep tariffs will probably unleash a new wave of economic chaos, with risks of higher inflation and further fraying of relations between two nations that had been closely woven together before Trump’s return to the White House.
The Canadian prime minister, Mark Carney, said in a statement that his government has made comprehensive proposals to resolve trade disputes with Washington, asserting that Trump’s past tariffs violated a trade pact between the two countries.
“This trade dispute has raised costs for families, particularly in the US,” he said. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the US to the mutual benefit of our citizens.”
The White House said the tariffs will go into effect in 30 days, leaving time for possible negotiations between the two countries.
Trump signed three proclamations to launch the tariffs under Section 338 of the 1930 Trade Act. Several Democratic lawmakers last year proposed repealing the section because they said Trump could use it to destabilize the economy.
A White House fact sheet claims Trump is “taking action to hold Canada accountable for its continued discrimination against and unreasonable and unequal treatment of U.S. commerce that has burdened and disadvantaged hardworking Americans”.
Trump claims in the proclamations that Canada discriminates against American automobiles, alcohol and cheese relative to other nations, but his argument rests in large part on retaliatory actions taken by Canada after the US president imposed tariffs on Canada under the pretext that it should do more to stop fentanyl smuggling into the US.
Trump noted in his autos proclamation that Canada maintained, starting in April 2025, a 25% tariff on the imports of US motor vehicles that did not qualify for preferential treatment under the USMCA.
The White House also cited all but two Canadian provinces and territories stopping the sale of US alcoholic beverages, while not imposing similar restrictions on other countries.
Trump also objected to Canada’s treatment of US cheese, saying in his proclamation that Canada discriminates against the US compared to Europe on dairy products.
#trump #carney #canada #tariffs #ontario
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Trump is imposing 50% tariffs on most Canadian goods in response to the country retaliating against previous US tariffs, the White House announced Monday, declaring Canada has unfairly discriminated against American cars, alcohol and dairy products.
The tariffs will hit a wide range of products, the White House said, including wine, hockey sticks and cement. They also include goods previously protected from import taxes under the United States-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) agreement.
The new tariffs will exclude energy products, fish, critical minerals and potash. They also exclude products already subject to tariffs aimed at protecting national security, such as steel and aluminum.
The steep tariffs will probably unleash a new wave of economic chaos, with risks of higher inflation and further fraying of relations between two nations that had been closely woven together before Trump’s return to the White House.
The Canadian prime minister, Mark Carney, said in a statement that his government has made comprehensive proposals to resolve trade disputes with Washington, asserting that Trump’s past tariffs violated a trade pact between the two countries.
“This trade dispute has raised costs for families, particularly in the US,” he said. “Canada stands ready to engage intensively to address outstanding issues with the US to the mutual benefit of our citizens.”
The White House said the tariffs will go into effect in 30 days, leaving time for possible negotiations between the two countries.
Trump signed three proclamations to launch the tariffs under Section 338 of the 1930 Trade Act. Several Democratic lawmakers last year proposed repealing the section because they said Trump could use it to destabilize the economy.
A White House fact sheet claims Trump is “taking action to hold Canada accountable for its continued discrimination against and unreasonable and unequal treatment of U.S. commerce that has burdened and disadvantaged hardworking Americans”.
Trump claims in the proclamations that Canada discriminates against American automobiles, alcohol and cheese relative to other nations, but his argument rests in large part on retaliatory actions taken by Canada after the US president imposed tariffs on Canada under the pretext that it should do more to stop fentanyl smuggling into the US.
Trump noted in his autos proclamation that Canada maintained, starting in April 2025, a 25% tariff on the imports of US motor vehicles that did not qualify for preferential treatment under the USMCA.
The White House also cited all but two Canadian provinces and territories stopping the sale of US alcoholic beverages, while not imposing similar restrictions on other countries.
Trump also objected to Canada’s treatment of US cheese, saying in his proclamation that Canada discriminates against the US compared to Europe on dairy products.
#trump #carney #canada #tariffs #ontario
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😢7🔥6🤯6😱6🤬6💯6🙏3