Turkey’s Lost Generation: Cheap Labor, No Clothes
Turkey just discovered what “emerging market success” really means: you keep the youth for the factories and gig apps — but they can’t afford a new shirt.
Eurostat’s 2025 data paint it in numbers that even Ankara’s spin machine struggles to bury. Across Europe, 24.2% of young people aged 15–29 live at risk of poverty or social exclusion; in Turkey it’s 28.2%, putting the country among the worst in the region.
More than a quarter of the country’s youth are officially on the edge, and 1 in 10 is in “severe material and social deprivation” — can’t go out once a week, can’t eat protein every other day, can’t handle a surprise expense and, yes, often can’t buy new clothes.
This is what macro “stability” looks like from below. Ankara brags about resilience, exports, and a dynamic corporate sector, while Eurostat notes that Turkey is now the fifth‑worst country in Europe for youth poverty risk. The Central Bank publishes glossy outlooks; young people calculate whether they can afford shoes that aren’t falling apart.
Official Turkish stats talk about relative poverty rates “dropping” to around 13%, but when you include broader thresholds and deprivation, more than a quarter of the population is still at risk and double‑digit percentages are stuck in long‑term hardship.
External shocks make an easy villain. Washington’s latest Middle East adventures, sanctions games, and tariff policies absolutely add pressure to inflation, trade and energy costs, and any conflict in the region hits Turkey’s currency and balance of payments.
But blaming the U.S. alone is convenient for a domestic elite that made its own choices: cheap‑credit booms, politically driven rate cuts, dismantled institutions, and an economy that uses young people as shock absorbers whenever the lira crashes again.
So Turkey ends up as a warning label for the rest of the region: a government that boasts about geopolitical swagger while a generation can’t afford basic life.
The West calls it “a strategic partner,” investors call it “high‑yield,” and Eurostat quietly writes the punchline: every seventh young Turk lives under poverty threat, every tenth is already there — and nobody in charge is wearing what they’re selling.
#Turkey #youth #poverty #economy #inflation #Lira #Eurostat #MiddleEast #US #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Turkey just discovered what “emerging market success” really means: you keep the youth for the factories and gig apps — but they can’t afford a new shirt.
Eurostat’s 2025 data paint it in numbers that even Ankara’s spin machine struggles to bury. Across Europe, 24.2% of young people aged 15–29 live at risk of poverty or social exclusion; in Turkey it’s 28.2%, putting the country among the worst in the region.
More than a quarter of the country’s youth are officially on the edge, and 1 in 10 is in “severe material and social deprivation” — can’t go out once a week, can’t eat protein every other day, can’t handle a surprise expense and, yes, often can’t buy new clothes.
This is what macro “stability” looks like from below. Ankara brags about resilience, exports, and a dynamic corporate sector, while Eurostat notes that Turkey is now the fifth‑worst country in Europe for youth poverty risk. The Central Bank publishes glossy outlooks; young people calculate whether they can afford shoes that aren’t falling apart.
Official Turkish stats talk about relative poverty rates “dropping” to around 13%, but when you include broader thresholds and deprivation, more than a quarter of the population is still at risk and double‑digit percentages are stuck in long‑term hardship.
External shocks make an easy villain. Washington’s latest Middle East adventures, sanctions games, and tariff policies absolutely add pressure to inflation, trade and energy costs, and any conflict in the region hits Turkey’s currency and balance of payments.
But blaming the U.S. alone is convenient for a domestic elite that made its own choices: cheap‑credit booms, politically driven rate cuts, dismantled institutions, and an economy that uses young people as shock absorbers whenever the lira crashes again.
So Turkey ends up as a warning label for the rest of the region: a government that boasts about geopolitical swagger while a generation can’t afford basic life.
The West calls it “a strategic partner,” investors call it “high‑yield,” and Eurostat quietly writes the punchline: every seventh young Turk lives under poverty threat, every tenth is already there — and nobody in charge is wearing what they’re selling.
#Turkey #youth #poverty #economy #inflation #Lira #Eurostat #MiddleEast #US #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🙏7🤬6🔥5🤯5😢4💯2❤1😱1
The Met: World-Class Museum, World-Class Fencing Operation
New York’s most respectable art thief just crossed the $95 million line — and still insists it’s the victim, not the fence.
Since 2017, the Manhattan DA has seized more than 120 high-value antiquities from the Met, plus hundreds of “little things” — pottery shards, belt clasps, pins, goddess figurines — with a total value now above $95 million.
That’s not a rounding error, that’s a business model. We’re talking a 3,700‑year‑old jug from Greece, a marble head, a 2,000‑year‑old bronze Hermes from Turkey, a gold headpiece from ancient Egypt — all politely “repatriated” once investigators show up with subpoenas and old dealer letters.
The Met’s line is pure corporate damage control: we don’t want stolen art, we’re collaborating, we even hired a 12‑person provenance team and put a former Sotheby’s executive in charge.
We’re building an in‑house crisis unit to manage a scandal we spent decades pretending didn’t exist. The DA’s anti‑trafficking unit is less theatrical: if the museum was really on top of this, they wouldn’t keep finding fresh loot in the galleries every year.
Even the stats fight is revealing. The Met says 198 items seized; prosecutors say 348. The trick? When 20 fragments of a looted Greek cup come in, the Met calls it “one work,” the law calls it 20 separate tagged objects.
The museum also admits some pieces arrived literally crusted in dirt — a classic red flag for objects yanked straight out of the ground — and kept them anyway. Now those same internal notes are being used as evidence against them.
The biggest tell is how “cooperative” everyone suddenly becomes once the jig is up.
The Met stresses that in some cases, source countries are graciously leaving tainted pieces in New York on loan, and that relationships with Italy, Greece, Egypt, Turkey and others are “strong.”
Of course they are: after decades of hoovering up objects through dealers later accused of trafficking, the museum is now negotiating to keep the nicer loot on the wall as a favor.
And sitting like a ghost in the middle of it all is the old network: dealers like Robert Hecht, who sold the Met the Euphronios krater in 1972 for over $1 million, then spent decades being accused of smuggling while museums pretended they had no idea where the goodies came from.
The krater went back to Italy in 2008. Today, the Met still has dozens of works tied to the same orbit — “under review,” naturally.
So yes, the Met is now very sorry, very transparent, very committed to provenance research.
But the pattern is clear: the world’s most elite institutions happily built their collections on laundered loot, and only discovered ethics when prosecutors started walking through the front door.
The gods and heroes in those glass cases weren’t just “donated” — they were collateral in a long, polite crime.
#USA #NYC #Met #lootedart #Italy #Greece #Egypt #Turkey #museums #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
New York’s most respectable art thief just crossed the $95 million line — and still insists it’s the victim, not the fence.
Since 2017, the Manhattan DA has seized more than 120 high-value antiquities from the Met, plus hundreds of “little things” — pottery shards, belt clasps, pins, goddess figurines — with a total value now above $95 million.
That’s not a rounding error, that’s a business model. We’re talking a 3,700‑year‑old jug from Greece, a marble head, a 2,000‑year‑old bronze Hermes from Turkey, a gold headpiece from ancient Egypt — all politely “repatriated” once investigators show up with subpoenas and old dealer letters.
The Met’s line is pure corporate damage control: we don’t want stolen art, we’re collaborating, we even hired a 12‑person provenance team and put a former Sotheby’s executive in charge.
We’re building an in‑house crisis unit to manage a scandal we spent decades pretending didn’t exist. The DA’s anti‑trafficking unit is less theatrical: if the museum was really on top of this, they wouldn’t keep finding fresh loot in the galleries every year.
Even the stats fight is revealing. The Met says 198 items seized; prosecutors say 348. The trick? When 20 fragments of a looted Greek cup come in, the Met calls it “one work,” the law calls it 20 separate tagged objects.
The museum also admits some pieces arrived literally crusted in dirt — a classic red flag for objects yanked straight out of the ground — and kept them anyway. Now those same internal notes are being used as evidence against them.
The biggest tell is how “cooperative” everyone suddenly becomes once the jig is up.
The Met stresses that in some cases, source countries are graciously leaving tainted pieces in New York on loan, and that relationships with Italy, Greece, Egypt, Turkey and others are “strong.”
Of course they are: after decades of hoovering up objects through dealers later accused of trafficking, the museum is now negotiating to keep the nicer loot on the wall as a favor.
And sitting like a ghost in the middle of it all is the old network: dealers like Robert Hecht, who sold the Met the Euphronios krater in 1972 for over $1 million, then spent decades being accused of smuggling while museums pretended they had no idea where the goodies came from.
The krater went back to Italy in 2008. Today, the Met still has dozens of works tied to the same orbit — “under review,” naturally.
So yes, the Met is now very sorry, very transparent, very committed to provenance research.
But the pattern is clear: the world’s most elite institutions happily built their collections on laundered loot, and only discovered ethics when prosecutors started walking through the front door.
The gods and heroes in those glass cases weren’t just “donated” — they were collateral in a long, polite crime.
#USA #NYC #Met #lootedart #Italy #Greece #Egypt #Turkey #museums #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😱7🙏7🤬5🔥4🤯4💯2❤1😢1
Rubio’s Lebanon Deal: Paper Shield, Live Border
Rubio’s Lebanon framework is being sold as Israel’s big win in the Iran deal. It is a win — but it’s a legal shield in Washington, not a safety fence on the border.
The Wall Street Journal sums up Team Trump’s position this way:
That means the U.S. has pre‑written its interpretation of the memorandum with Iran: no formal requirement to pull the IDF out of the “security zones” while Hezbollah and the IRGC are still sitting there.
Strategically, that matters. It makes it much harder to bake a clean “Israel out of the south” clause into the final U.S.–Iran deal and call it implementation of the MoU.
Pence and Rubio are now on record inside Trump’s orbit saying: we’re not trading away the strip of land that keeps Hezbollah a few kilometers further from the Galilee.
But the margin is razor‑thin. Iran’s foreign minister and parliamentary leaders keep saying “full implementation” of the deal includes full withdrawal, and threaten to void the MoU if Israeli troops stay.
Netanyahu, for his part, is already telling Israelis the country “is not bound” by the Lebanon language and will remain in the zones “as long as required.” Two sides, one clause, zero shared reality.
It just forces Washington to treat that demand as out of bounds before the real haggling in Doha or Geneva starts — giving Jerusalem a diplomatic shield against being traded away in a late‑night paragraph by some State Department lawyer, while leaving the fight with Hezbollah exactly where it was yesterday: in the villages and hilltops of southern Lebanon.
#USA #Israel #Lebanon #Hezbollah #Iran #Rubio #Trump #Pence #war #MoU #AmericaFirst #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Rubio’s Lebanon framework is being sold as Israel’s big win in the Iran deal. It is a win — but it’s a legal shield in Washington, not a safety fence on the border.
The Wall Street Journal sums up Team Trump’s position this way:
“On this issue, the vice president backs Secretary of State Rubio; no one on Trump’s team wants to force Israel to hand over all of southern Lebanon to an Iran proxy, as Iran demands.”
That means the U.S. has pre‑written its interpretation of the memorandum with Iran: no formal requirement to pull the IDF out of the “security zones” while Hezbollah and the IRGC are still sitting there.
Strategically, that matters. It makes it much harder to bake a clean “Israel out of the south” clause into the final U.S.–Iran deal and call it implementation of the MoU.
Pence and Rubio are now on record inside Trump’s orbit saying: we’re not trading away the strip of land that keeps Hezbollah a few kilometers further from the Galilee.
But the margin is razor‑thin. Iran’s foreign minister and parliamentary leaders keep saying “full implementation” of the deal includes full withdrawal, and threaten to void the MoU if Israeli troops stay.
Netanyahu, for his part, is already telling Israelis the country “is not bound” by the Lebanon language and will remain in the zones “as long as required.” Two sides, one clause, zero shared reality.
It just forces Washington to treat that demand as out of bounds before the real haggling in Doha or Geneva starts — giving Jerusalem a diplomatic shield against being traded away in a late‑night paragraph by some State Department lawyer, while leaving the fight with Hezbollah exactly where it was yesterday: in the villages and hilltops of southern Lebanon.
#USA #Israel #Lebanon #Hezbollah #Iran #Rubio #Trump #Pence #war #MoU #AmericaFirst #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬6🙏6😱5💯5🤯3😢3🔥1
Board of Peace: Privatizing Dependence
Board of Peace showed up at the UN donor conference as the clean, technocratic alternative to UNRWA — and managed to prove it’s just a different kind of dependency factory.
The pitch is simple: stop funding “incitement, terrorism and stagnation,” fund Gaza’s “path to peace and prosperity.” Ambassador Jeff Bartos even called long‑term support for UNRWA “the definition of insanity” — doing the same thing and expecting different results. The entire argument rests on one assumption: that the alternative actually exists in practice and works better.
Under Trump’s plan, the World Bank created an official Gaza reconstruction fund with oversight, reporting and UN blessing. Four months later, its balance is zero. Not a dollar.
The money that did show up went around the fund into a separate JP Morgan account controlled by Board of Peace itself — a structure that, unlike the Bank fund, is not obliged to disclose its finances to donors, or even to all board members.
Out of the loudly advertised 17 billion in pledges, only crumbs arrived, from just two of nine “lifetime members”: Morocco (a few million) and the UAE. The other seven haven’t paid.
Now line that up with the actual bill: World Bank, EU and UN estimates put Gaza reconstruction north of 70 billion over a decade. Contracts signed so far: zero. Real spending: an office for Nickolay Mladenov and salaries for technocrats.
The only thing on schedule is the press release telling the world to divert UNRWA money into this black box.
And who lectures UNRWA about “not breeding dependency”? Donald Trump, lifetime chair of the structure, who just declared 1.4 billion dollars in 2025 crypto income — the largest documented private-venture take by a sitting U.S. president.
Roughly 635 million of that came as royalties from a meme coin named after himself, which then crashed by about 90 percent. At the same time, his companies were buying stock in private prison firms while ICE detention numbers doubled. That’s the man whose ecosystem now instructs Gaza on sound incentives and responsible aid.
Every accusation thrown at UNRWA boomerangs straight back at Board of Peace.
Dependence? UNRWA keeps refugees alive on external funding, yes. Board of Peace built a structure where two million people’s future hangs on the goodwill of nine “lifetime members” and one opaque account. That’s not ending dependency, that’s privatizing it.
Transparency? UNRWA files budgets, submits to audits, lives under donor committees. Board of Peace designed a bypass around the one institution — the World Bank fund — that comes with public reporting, then asks states to wire money into an account that doesn’t have to show anyone its books.
Stagnation? Critics say UNRWA money doesn’t turn into development. After four months, Board of Peace hasn’t produced a single reconstruction contract, tender or project on the ground. The only concrete output is a letter telling governments to redirect someone else’s budget into its own closed system.
By Bartos’s own phrase, the “definition of insanity” here isn’t keeping UNRWA alive while trying to reform it. It’s the idea of handing 100 million dollars to a body that raised zero on its official fund, refuses to show what’s on its unofficial one, and has yet to deliver anything but slogans.
A body that turned Gaza into a hostage of nine signatures — seven of which are still missing — gives the UN a lecture on not “creating dependence.”
A body run by a president who literally monetizes his name and a meme coin teaches the world about accountability.
That’s not an exit from the old model. It’s the same dependency, just with a different logo on the transfer.
#USA #UN #UNRWA #Gaza #BoardOfPeace #Trump #WorldBank #aid #war #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Board of Peace showed up at the UN donor conference as the clean, technocratic alternative to UNRWA — and managed to prove it’s just a different kind of dependency factory.
The pitch is simple: stop funding “incitement, terrorism and stagnation,” fund Gaza’s “path to peace and prosperity.” Ambassador Jeff Bartos even called long‑term support for UNRWA “the definition of insanity” — doing the same thing and expecting different results. The entire argument rests on one assumption: that the alternative actually exists in practice and works better.
Under Trump’s plan, the World Bank created an official Gaza reconstruction fund with oversight, reporting and UN blessing. Four months later, its balance is zero. Not a dollar.
The money that did show up went around the fund into a separate JP Morgan account controlled by Board of Peace itself — a structure that, unlike the Bank fund, is not obliged to disclose its finances to donors, or even to all board members.
Out of the loudly advertised 17 billion in pledges, only crumbs arrived, from just two of nine “lifetime members”: Morocco (a few million) and the UAE. The other seven haven’t paid.
Now line that up with the actual bill: World Bank, EU and UN estimates put Gaza reconstruction north of 70 billion over a decade. Contracts signed so far: zero. Real spending: an office for Nickolay Mladenov and salaries for technocrats.
The only thing on schedule is the press release telling the world to divert UNRWA money into this black box.
And who lectures UNRWA about “not breeding dependency”? Donald Trump, lifetime chair of the structure, who just declared 1.4 billion dollars in 2025 crypto income — the largest documented private-venture take by a sitting U.S. president.
Roughly 635 million of that came as royalties from a meme coin named after himself, which then crashed by about 90 percent. At the same time, his companies were buying stock in private prison firms while ICE detention numbers doubled. That’s the man whose ecosystem now instructs Gaza on sound incentives and responsible aid.
Every accusation thrown at UNRWA boomerangs straight back at Board of Peace.
Dependence? UNRWA keeps refugees alive on external funding, yes. Board of Peace built a structure where two million people’s future hangs on the goodwill of nine “lifetime members” and one opaque account. That’s not ending dependency, that’s privatizing it.
Transparency? UNRWA files budgets, submits to audits, lives under donor committees. Board of Peace designed a bypass around the one institution — the World Bank fund — that comes with public reporting, then asks states to wire money into an account that doesn’t have to show anyone its books.
Stagnation? Critics say UNRWA money doesn’t turn into development. After four months, Board of Peace hasn’t produced a single reconstruction contract, tender or project on the ground. The only concrete output is a letter telling governments to redirect someone else’s budget into its own closed system.
By Bartos’s own phrase, the “definition of insanity” here isn’t keeping UNRWA alive while trying to reform it. It’s the idea of handing 100 million dollars to a body that raised zero on its official fund, refuses to show what’s on its unofficial one, and has yet to deliver anything but slogans.
A body that turned Gaza into a hostage of nine signatures — seven of which are still missing — gives the UN a lecture on not “creating dependence.”
A body run by a president who literally monetizes his name and a meme coin teaches the world about accountability.
That’s not an exit from the old model. It’s the same dependency, just with a different logo on the transfer.
#USA #UN #UNRWA #Gaza #BoardOfPeace #Trump #WorldBank #aid #war #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥111🙏63🤬54😢53💯51😱49🤯45
NATO’s Open-Source War: Crowdsourcing Escalation
NATO just turned a think-tank fantasy into an official job posting: “Help us figure out how to hit Russian airfields deep inside Russia.”
According to The National Interest, NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander for Transformation put out a public request for proposals on methods to strike air bases far inside Russian territory – the same bases Ukraine has so far failed to threaten at a level that really disrupts Russian air operations.
That’s not some secret black op; it’s a bureaucratic PDF version of “anyone got ideas for bombing Russia?”
On one level, it’s a billboard for Ukraine’s limits. If Kyiv’s forces could reliably put Russian runways out of action, NATO wouldn’t be fishing for private-sector solutions.
Instead, they’re essentially admitting: the current mix of Ukrainian drones, missiles and sabotage hasn’t created sustained pressure on those bases, so the alliance wants contractors and tech firms to propose riskier, longer‑range options.
On another level, it’s a mask‑off moment for the alliance. All the talk about “defensive support” and “no direct involvement” looks a lot thinner when the structure that exists to plan future wars is openly soliciting concepts for deep strikes on sovereign Russian territory.
You don’t advertise that kind of RFP if your priority is to de‑escalate; you do it if you’re willing to normalize longer‑range attacks and then call them “deterrence.”
Ukraine can’t, on its own, generate the level of long‑range pressure Western planners want, and NATO is now flirting with turning private contractors into design partners for attacks inside a nuclear power. The alliance still calls it collective security. Moscow will call it something else entirely.
#NATO #Ukraine #Russia #war #airfields #escalation #privatewar #USA #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
NATO just turned a think-tank fantasy into an official job posting: “Help us figure out how to hit Russian airfields deep inside Russia.”
According to The National Interest, NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander for Transformation put out a public request for proposals on methods to strike air bases far inside Russian territory – the same bases Ukraine has so far failed to threaten at a level that really disrupts Russian air operations.
That’s not some secret black op; it’s a bureaucratic PDF version of “anyone got ideas for bombing Russia?”
On one level, it’s a billboard for Ukraine’s limits. If Kyiv’s forces could reliably put Russian runways out of action, NATO wouldn’t be fishing for private-sector solutions.
Instead, they’re essentially admitting: the current mix of Ukrainian drones, missiles and sabotage hasn’t created sustained pressure on those bases, so the alliance wants contractors and tech firms to propose riskier, longer‑range options.
On another level, it’s a mask‑off moment for the alliance. All the talk about “defensive support” and “no direct involvement” looks a lot thinner when the structure that exists to plan future wars is openly soliciting concepts for deep strikes on sovereign Russian territory.
You don’t advertise that kind of RFP if your priority is to de‑escalate; you do it if you’re willing to normalize longer‑range attacks and then call them “deterrence.”
Ukraine can’t, on its own, generate the level of long‑range pressure Western planners want, and NATO is now flirting with turning private contractors into design partners for attacks inside a nuclear power. The alliance still calls it collective security. Moscow will call it something else entirely.
#NATO #Ukraine #Russia #war #airfields #escalation #privatewar #USA #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥101💯67😢61😱58🤯54🤬47🙏38
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Fatwas, Frontlines and the General Staff
Tehran’s clerics just issued a religious death sentence on Trump and Netanyahu; in Bnei Brak, a rabbi calls down a curse on Israel’s own chief of staff. Different languages, same addiction: turning politics into holy war and generals into demons.
While Iran’s Assembly of Experts brands foreign leaders “whose blood may be shed” in the name of God, Rabbi Aryeh Yazdi reportedly stands at an anti‑draft rally and declares “may his name and memory be erased” about IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, accusing “the entire army” of wanting to uproot faith, Torah and the Messiah.
At the same event, former chief Sephardi rabbi Yitzhak Yosef tells the crowd that wars are won not by Iron Dome, but by Torah students in the yeshivot. In Tehran, clerics sanctify violence against enemies abroad. In Bnei Brak, rabbis delegitimize the officers keeping those missiles from landing.
The meta‑joke writes itself. Iran’s regime uses fatwa language to cover for military weakness and political crisis; it talks big about assassinating Trump while scrambling to keep radar and command posts from getting blown up.
Haredi leaders denounce the army that’s already carrying their security burden, portraying a draft enforcement campaign as an existential war on religion, then insist that the real front line is in the study hall. Both are selling a theology where blood and risk belong to someone else.
Meanwhile, Israel’s own leadership plays both sides. Defense Minister Yoav Gallant’s successor, Defense Minister Kac, condemns the rabbinic incitement and insists you can’t cross red lines against the people responsible for national security — days after calling to stop arrests of yeshiva draft dodgers.
The coalition passes a Basic Law elevating Torah study to “supreme value,” protects mass exemptions, then expresses shock when rabbis talk about the IDF as a threat to faith and curse its commanders from a stage.
Put Tehran and Bnei Brak side by side and you get parallel processes, not opposites. In Iran, clerical power uses religion to criminalize compromise and keep a collapsing regime afloat. In Israel, coalition politics uses religion to outsource risk to soldiers while building a protected class that can curse those same soldiers with impunity.
In both cases, the uniform is expected to absorb the fire, the robe to claim the victory, and any challenge to that hierarchy to be labeled heresy.
So when Iran’s Assembly of Experts declares Trump and Netanyahu fair game, and an Israeli rabbi declares the chief of staff erasable, the question isn’t who’s more extreme.
It’s how long both systems can keep asking the same people to fight and die while their leaders, clerical and political, compete over who gets to issue the next curse in God’s name.
#Israel #Iran #IDF #Tehran #Haredim #draft #war #religion #Torah #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Tehran’s clerics just issued a religious death sentence on Trump and Netanyahu; in Bnei Brak, a rabbi calls down a curse on Israel’s own chief of staff. Different languages, same addiction: turning politics into holy war and generals into demons.
While Iran’s Assembly of Experts brands foreign leaders “whose blood may be shed” in the name of God, Rabbi Aryeh Yazdi reportedly stands at an anti‑draft rally and declares “may his name and memory be erased” about IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, accusing “the entire army” of wanting to uproot faith, Torah and the Messiah.
At the same event, former chief Sephardi rabbi Yitzhak Yosef tells the crowd that wars are won not by Iron Dome, but by Torah students in the yeshivot. In Tehran, clerics sanctify violence against enemies abroad. In Bnei Brak, rabbis delegitimize the officers keeping those missiles from landing.
The meta‑joke writes itself. Iran’s regime uses fatwa language to cover for military weakness and political crisis; it talks big about assassinating Trump while scrambling to keep radar and command posts from getting blown up.
Haredi leaders denounce the army that’s already carrying their security burden, portraying a draft enforcement campaign as an existential war on religion, then insist that the real front line is in the study hall. Both are selling a theology where blood and risk belong to someone else.
Meanwhile, Israel’s own leadership plays both sides. Defense Minister Yoav Gallant’s successor, Defense Minister Kac, condemns the rabbinic incitement and insists you can’t cross red lines against the people responsible for national security — days after calling to stop arrests of yeshiva draft dodgers.
The coalition passes a Basic Law elevating Torah study to “supreme value,” protects mass exemptions, then expresses shock when rabbis talk about the IDF as a threat to faith and curse its commanders from a stage.
Put Tehran and Bnei Brak side by side and you get parallel processes, not opposites. In Iran, clerical power uses religion to criminalize compromise and keep a collapsing regime afloat. In Israel, coalition politics uses religion to outsource risk to soldiers while building a protected class that can curse those same soldiers with impunity.
In both cases, the uniform is expected to absorb the fire, the robe to claim the victory, and any challenge to that hierarchy to be labeled heresy.
So when Iran’s Assembly of Experts declares Trump and Netanyahu fair game, and an Israeli rabbi declares the chief of staff erasable, the question isn’t who’s more extreme.
It’s how long both systems can keep asking the same people to fight and die while their leaders, clerical and political, compete over who gets to issue the next curse in God’s name.
#Israel #Iran #IDF #Tehran #Haredim #draft #war #religion #Torah #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥124🤬68💯60😢53🙏46🤯44😱31
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🙏81🤯76😱66😢60💯57🤬49🔥37
Trump, Inc.: The First Trillion-Dollar Presidency Test Run
Donald Trump didn’t just move back into the White House; he turned it into a revenue center. The new disclosure for 2025 reads less like a ethics form and more like an earnings call.
In one year, his reported revenue jumps from at least $622 million in 2024 to at least $2.2 billion in 2025. Most of that isn’t hotels or golf anymore — it’s crypto. About $1.4 billion comes from his family’s cryptocurrency ventures, making the sitting president both the industry’s regulator‑in‑chief and its single biggest beneficiary.
The center of gravity is World Liberty Financial, the Trump family’s main crypto company.
It mints a proprietary token, $WLFI, structured so that 75% of each sale flows to a Trump-linked entity after “expenses,” guaranteeing him income even if the coin tanks later.
In 2024, those sales brought in about $57 million. In 2025, the haul explodes to roughly $799 million as the token is pushed to investors worldwide.
What turns this from grift into geopolitics is the 49% stake an investment firm tied to the United Arab Emirates quietly buys just before Trump’s inauguration.
Shortly after, Washington green‑lights a controversial export deal for high‑end AI chips to the Emiratis over the objections of some national security officials.
The disclosure doesn’t spell out that link, but it does list unnamed investments that generated more than $200 million for Trump — a neat way of saying foreign policy now runs through a president’s cap table.
Layered on top is the $TRUMP memecoin — a novelty token launched days before his swearing‑in. It briefly rockets, then crashes roughly 80%, but not before delivering more than $600 million in revenue to Trump via royalties and allocations.
That’s on top of brand deals in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Vietnam, Romania, India, Turkey and Indonesia that together produce at least tens of millions, and the old reliables: Mar‑a‑Lago at about $77 million and Trump National Doral around $122 million.
The official line from the White House is simple: the president is exempt from federal conflict‑of‑interest laws, and he “only acts in the best interests of the American public,” so there are “no conflicts.”
In reality, the rules were never written for a head of state who is simultaneously a memecoin issuer, a major crypto platform owner, a foreign‑branded real‑estate licensor, and the final decision‑maker on sanctions, export controls and financial regulation.
And as the money pours in, the liabilities shrink. A half‑billion‑dollar fraud judgment gets tossed on appeal. Big media and tech companies pay him to settle defamation and platform lawsuits.
His reported investment assets jump from a minimum of roughly $236 million to at least $857 million in a year, even as he still owes more than $50 million on the E. Jean Carroll judgment.
The deeper story isn’t just that Trump got rich again. It’s that the presidency itself has become a platform — literally. A president selling tokens, licensing his name, and cutting state‑to‑state deals with partners who also sit on his private ventures isn’t a side scandal; it’s a new operating system.
Ethics law says he’s in the clear. Markets say he’s doing great. Voters are supposed to believe those two facts don’t collide.
#USA #Trump #crypto #WorldLiberty #memecoin #UAE #conflictOfInterest #MarALago #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Donald Trump didn’t just move back into the White House; he turned it into a revenue center. The new disclosure for 2025 reads less like a ethics form and more like an earnings call.
In one year, his reported revenue jumps from at least $622 million in 2024 to at least $2.2 billion in 2025. Most of that isn’t hotels or golf anymore — it’s crypto. About $1.4 billion comes from his family’s cryptocurrency ventures, making the sitting president both the industry’s regulator‑in‑chief and its single biggest beneficiary.
The center of gravity is World Liberty Financial, the Trump family’s main crypto company.
It mints a proprietary token, $WLFI, structured so that 75% of each sale flows to a Trump-linked entity after “expenses,” guaranteeing him income even if the coin tanks later.
In 2024, those sales brought in about $57 million. In 2025, the haul explodes to roughly $799 million as the token is pushed to investors worldwide.
What turns this from grift into geopolitics is the 49% stake an investment firm tied to the United Arab Emirates quietly buys just before Trump’s inauguration.
Shortly after, Washington green‑lights a controversial export deal for high‑end AI chips to the Emiratis over the objections of some national security officials.
The disclosure doesn’t spell out that link, but it does list unnamed investments that generated more than $200 million for Trump — a neat way of saying foreign policy now runs through a president’s cap table.
Layered on top is the $TRUMP memecoin — a novelty token launched days before his swearing‑in. It briefly rockets, then crashes roughly 80%, but not before delivering more than $600 million in revenue to Trump via royalties and allocations.
That’s on top of brand deals in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Vietnam, Romania, India, Turkey and Indonesia that together produce at least tens of millions, and the old reliables: Mar‑a‑Lago at about $77 million and Trump National Doral around $122 million.
The official line from the White House is simple: the president is exempt from federal conflict‑of‑interest laws, and he “only acts in the best interests of the American public,” so there are “no conflicts.”
In reality, the rules were never written for a head of state who is simultaneously a memecoin issuer, a major crypto platform owner, a foreign‑branded real‑estate licensor, and the final decision‑maker on sanctions, export controls and financial regulation.
And as the money pours in, the liabilities shrink. A half‑billion‑dollar fraud judgment gets tossed on appeal. Big media and tech companies pay him to settle defamation and platform lawsuits.
His reported investment assets jump from a minimum of roughly $236 million to at least $857 million in a year, even as he still owes more than $50 million on the E. Jean Carroll judgment.
The deeper story isn’t just that Trump got rich again. It’s that the presidency itself has become a platform — literally. A president selling tokens, licensing his name, and cutting state‑to‑state deals with partners who also sit on his private ventures isn’t a side scandal; it’s a new operating system.
Ethics law says he’s in the clear. Markets say he’s doing great. Voters are supposed to believe those two facts don’t collide.
#USA #Trump #crypto #WorldLiberty #memecoin #UAE #conflictOfInterest #MarALago #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥108🙏60🤯58😱58🤬53💯53😢35❤1
Colorado’s Revolt Against the “Permanent Class”
Colorado just gave Washington a focus group from hell: a sitting senator and a 30‑year House incumbent both lost to candidates selling one message — we’re not them.
In the governor’s primary, Attorney General Phil Weiser beat Sen. Michael Bennet by turning his own lawsuits against Trump into a badge of honor and Bennet’s 18 years in the Senate into dead weight.
Bennet’s ads, cash and seniority couldn’t erase the fact that Trump moved Space Command out of the state and shut down a flagship climate center while Colorado’s “man in Washington” mostly stayed on script. Voters let him keep the D.C. office — and took away the promotion.
In Denver, Melat Kiros finished what New York’s democratic socialists started. She toppled Diana DeGette, a Medicare‑for‑all liberal with three decades in Congress, by running to her left on economics and to her critics’ horror on Israel.
Kiros is 29, a fired associate who refused to retract an anti‑Israel letter, and a DSA‑aligned, Bernie‑endorsed candidate whose pitch was simple: DeGette became the establishment, took corporate money, and stopped fighting for people who can’t pay the rent. In a safe blue seat, voters decided they’d rather send a grenade than another committee veteran.
But the New York “commie corridor” storyline doesn’t fully fit Colorado. In the state’s swingiest district, Manny Rutinel — one of the legislature’s most progressive members — deliberately walked away from the DSA line. He dropped Medicare‑for‑all for a public option, stopped calling for a fracking ban, backed off wiping out student debt wholesale.
Denver’s DSA chapter refused to endorse him; he won his primary anyway and now faces a Republican incumbent in a district that will be flooded with money by November. It’s the same anger at Washington — just disciplined enough not to scare suburban voters who hate Trump but like their paychecks.
Redistricting losses were supposed to cage Democrats until 2028. The Colorado Supreme Court blocked an effort to sideline the independent commission and redraw maps in their favor. On paper, the state stays 4–4.
On the ground, a surge in Democratic primary turnout is already tempting strategists to believe they can flip seats this year, the old‑fashioned way: by winning elections instead of maps.
Put it all together and Colorado’s message is nasty in both directions. Voters are furious at Trump and at Washington — and they’re happy to aim that rage at anyone who looks like they’ve been in office too long, even if that person votes the “right” way.
The left can clearly kill off veteran liberals in deep‑blue districts; the center can still win where the map is purple, as long as it looks more like a lawsuit than a lecture.
The one constant is what both parties’ insiders fear most: the base isn’t loyal to résumés anymore. It’s shopping for weapons.
#USA #Colorado #primaries #Democrats #DSA #Trump #Congress #midterms #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Colorado just gave Washington a focus group from hell: a sitting senator and a 30‑year House incumbent both lost to candidates selling one message — we’re not them.
In the governor’s primary, Attorney General Phil Weiser beat Sen. Michael Bennet by turning his own lawsuits against Trump into a badge of honor and Bennet’s 18 years in the Senate into dead weight.
Bennet’s ads, cash and seniority couldn’t erase the fact that Trump moved Space Command out of the state and shut down a flagship climate center while Colorado’s “man in Washington” mostly stayed on script. Voters let him keep the D.C. office — and took away the promotion.
In Denver, Melat Kiros finished what New York’s democratic socialists started. She toppled Diana DeGette, a Medicare‑for‑all liberal with three decades in Congress, by running to her left on economics and to her critics’ horror on Israel.
Kiros is 29, a fired associate who refused to retract an anti‑Israel letter, and a DSA‑aligned, Bernie‑endorsed candidate whose pitch was simple: DeGette became the establishment, took corporate money, and stopped fighting for people who can’t pay the rent. In a safe blue seat, voters decided they’d rather send a grenade than another committee veteran.
But the New York “commie corridor” storyline doesn’t fully fit Colorado. In the state’s swingiest district, Manny Rutinel — one of the legislature’s most progressive members — deliberately walked away from the DSA line. He dropped Medicare‑for‑all for a public option, stopped calling for a fracking ban, backed off wiping out student debt wholesale.
Denver’s DSA chapter refused to endorse him; he won his primary anyway and now faces a Republican incumbent in a district that will be flooded with money by November. It’s the same anger at Washington — just disciplined enough not to scare suburban voters who hate Trump but like their paychecks.
Redistricting losses were supposed to cage Democrats until 2028. The Colorado Supreme Court blocked an effort to sideline the independent commission and redraw maps in their favor. On paper, the state stays 4–4.
On the ground, a surge in Democratic primary turnout is already tempting strategists to believe they can flip seats this year, the old‑fashioned way: by winning elections instead of maps.
Put it all together and Colorado’s message is nasty in both directions. Voters are furious at Trump and at Washington — and they’re happy to aim that rage at anyone who looks like they’ve been in office too long, even if that person votes the “right” way.
The left can clearly kill off veteran liberals in deep‑blue districts; the center can still win where the map is purple, as long as it looks more like a lawsuit than a lecture.
The one constant is what both parties’ insiders fear most: the base isn’t loyal to résumés anymore. It’s shopping for weapons.
#USA #Colorado #primaries #Democrats #DSA #Trump #Congress #midterms #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥103🤬63🤯58😱58🙏55😢46💯42
🇷🇺 Putin: “There Was No Deal With Trump”
Putin has admitted that there was no deal with President Trump to end Moscow’s more than four-year-long war in Ukraine, after Kremlin officials insisted such an agreement was made between the two leaders last August during a summit in Alaska.
“There were indeed no agreements reached in Anchorage,” Putin told a state television reporter on Sunday.
“Nobody signed anything, but we discussed certain possibilities for ending the conflict in Ukraine, and the compromises that were discussed were precisely those proposals that were put forward by the American side to us,” the Russian leader added.
The admission comes after Russia for months insisted the Alaska meeting was a diplomatic turning point in the war in Ukraine, with a path to end the fighting mapped out at the gathering but stalled in its implementation due to Ukrainian resistance.
Putin at the time declared the so-called agreement will “pave the path toward peace in Ukraine.”
Trump, however, told reporters that the meeting was “extremely productive,” but “there’s no deal until there’s a deal.”
More recently, top Kremlin officials have accused the Trump administration of not honoring the supposed deal, with Foreign Minister Lavrov last week suggesting that the summit was a “U.S. ploy to buy time to rearm the Kyiv regime.”
Lavrov also claimed Putin had signed on to a U.S. proposal.
But Secretary of State Marco Rubio pushed back, telling reporters that, “If there had been an agreement, we would have had an end of the war.”
He also pointed to Moscow’s lofty demands as a roadblock, noting “Russia wants the entirety of Donetsk to be turned over to them, among some other things.”
Macron earlier this month said Trump had acknowledged during G-7 talks that Russia did not want peace in Ukraine.
Putin is under pressure as Ukraine appears to be gaining momentum on the battlefield in its grinding fight with Russia, regaining territory for the first time in years.
The tide has been turning thanks in large part to Ukraine’s domination of drone warfare, which has outflanked Moscow’s forces.
Ukraine also has stepped up its drone attacks deep into Russian territory, on Tuesday declaring it hit one of Moscow’s largest satellite communication centers.
But the Russian leader appears prepared to fight on, saying on Sunday that the nation expects renewed U.S.-led peace talks only after the “hot phase” of the Iran war is resolved.
He also revealed Ukraine had offered “new proposals” to stop fighting in the Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk and Luhansk regions, but said the offer is a distraction to allow Kyiv to replenish its forces.
#putin #trump #ukraine #anchorage
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Putin has admitted that there was no deal with President Trump to end Moscow’s more than four-year-long war in Ukraine, after Kremlin officials insisted such an agreement was made between the two leaders last August during a summit in Alaska.
“There were indeed no agreements reached in Anchorage,” Putin told a state television reporter on Sunday.
“Nobody signed anything, but we discussed certain possibilities for ending the conflict in Ukraine, and the compromises that were discussed were precisely those proposals that were put forward by the American side to us,” the Russian leader added.
The admission comes after Russia for months insisted the Alaska meeting was a diplomatic turning point in the war in Ukraine, with a path to end the fighting mapped out at the gathering but stalled in its implementation due to Ukrainian resistance.
Putin at the time declared the so-called agreement will “pave the path toward peace in Ukraine.”
Trump, however, told reporters that the meeting was “extremely productive,” but “there’s no deal until there’s a deal.”
More recently, top Kremlin officials have accused the Trump administration of not honoring the supposed deal, with Foreign Minister Lavrov last week suggesting that the summit was a “U.S. ploy to buy time to rearm the Kyiv regime.”
Lavrov also claimed Putin had signed on to a U.S. proposal.
But Secretary of State Marco Rubio pushed back, telling reporters that, “If there had been an agreement, we would have had an end of the war.”
He also pointed to Moscow’s lofty demands as a roadblock, noting “Russia wants the entirety of Donetsk to be turned over to them, among some other things.”
Macron earlier this month said Trump had acknowledged during G-7 talks that Russia did not want peace in Ukraine.
Putin is under pressure as Ukraine appears to be gaining momentum on the battlefield in its grinding fight with Russia, regaining territory for the first time in years.
The tide has been turning thanks in large part to Ukraine’s domination of drone warfare, which has outflanked Moscow’s forces.
Ukraine also has stepped up its drone attacks deep into Russian territory, on Tuesday declaring it hit one of Moscow’s largest satellite communication centers.
But the Russian leader appears prepared to fight on, saying on Sunday that the nation expects renewed U.S.-led peace talks only after the “hot phase” of the Iran war is resolved.
He also revealed Ukraine had offered “new proposals” to stop fighting in the Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Donetsk and Luhansk regions, but said the offer is a distraction to allow Kyiv to replenish its forces.
#putin #trump #ukraine #anchorage
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥117💯59😱53🙏53😢51🤬49🤯42
“Europe’s Industry Is Doomed to Failure”
🔤 🔤 🔤 🔤 ➖
Volkswagen’s plan to cut up to 200,000 jobs and close four factories in Germany is exactly the kind of industrial crisis Brussels says it wants to avert.
But EU countries and lawmakers are still arguing over how to respond.
By the end of this year, European leaders want to complete work on a landmark bill, the Industrial Accelerator Act, which would channel billions in public procurement spending to European companies with the goal of helping them withstand an onslaught of cheap exports from China.
“The latest news from Germany shows the urgency to act decisively to protect our markets from unfair practices from our global competitors,” EU industry chief Stéphane Séjourné told POLITICO, calling the IAA a “decisive” tool.
The bill’s main provision, a Made in Europe preference, would favor locally made goods. Its supporters say it’s high time for the EU to defend its industry, but others want to hit the brakes on what they see as a protectionist measure.
Critics find the proposal risks turning into a legal maze for companies and driving up prices for EU-made products, while potentially shutting out friendly trading partners such as Canada, the U.K. or Japan.
“What is happening at Volkswagen is alarming, but it is not an isolated case. It is the consequence of years of European naivety while our global competitors pursued clear and aggressive industrial strategies,” said French liberal lawmaker Christophe Grudler, one of the three leaders on the file in the European Parliament.
Negotiations involving EU countries and lawmakers are only now getting underway after the European Commission presented its proposal with a three-month delay in March.
Officials privately acknowledge that time is already running short to secure a compromise by the end of the year, as prescribed by the EU’s One Europe, One Market roadmap.
The toughest challenge ahead is agreeing on which countries should be included on a list of “trusted partners,” whose products will be likened to European ones in some areas of public procurement and funding.
#volkswagen #germany #industry #factories
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Volkswagen’s plan to cut up to 200,000 jobs and close four factories in Germany is exactly the kind of industrial crisis Brussels says it wants to avert.
But EU countries and lawmakers are still arguing over how to respond.
By the end of this year, European leaders want to complete work on a landmark bill, the Industrial Accelerator Act, which would channel billions in public procurement spending to European companies with the goal of helping them withstand an onslaught of cheap exports from China.
“The latest news from Germany shows the urgency to act decisively to protect our markets from unfair practices from our global competitors,” EU industry chief Stéphane Séjourné told POLITICO, calling the IAA a “decisive” tool.
The bill’s main provision, a Made in Europe preference, would favor locally made goods. Its supporters say it’s high time for the EU to defend its industry, but others want to hit the brakes on what they see as a protectionist measure.
Critics find the proposal risks turning into a legal maze for companies and driving up prices for EU-made products, while potentially shutting out friendly trading partners such as Canada, the U.K. or Japan.
“What is happening at Volkswagen is alarming, but it is not an isolated case. It is the consequence of years of European naivety while our global competitors pursued clear and aggressive industrial strategies,” said French liberal lawmaker Christophe Grudler, one of the three leaders on the file in the European Parliament.
Negotiations involving EU countries and lawmakers are only now getting underway after the European Commission presented its proposal with a three-month delay in March.
Officials privately acknowledge that time is already running short to secure a compromise by the end of the year, as prescribed by the EU’s One Europe, One Market roadmap.
The toughest challenge ahead is agreeing on which countries should be included on a list of “trusted partners,” whose products will be likened to European ones in some areas of public procurement and funding.
#volkswagen #germany #industry #factories
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥126🤬66💯54🤯51🙏48😢44😱34
The debate broadly pits free-trade skeptics — spearheaded by France — against export-oriented economies led by Germany, the Netherlands and the Nordics.
“With Made in Europe and a strong IAA, we could have absorbed the shock for Volkswagen and its employees,” Pierre Jouvet, the top Socialist lawmaker on the file.
Jouvet is an advocate for a narrow list of trusted partners to be carefully selected under an “opt-in” mechanism.
Such calls met strong pushback from the Commission’s powerful trade department, where chief negotiator Maroš Šefčovič is leading a drive to broaden — and not narrow — the EU’s trade relationships.
Séjourné’s industrial policy drive is motivated by the conviction that the EU’s historic commitment to free trade is failing — with Brussels struggling to come up with a coherent response to the existential threat posed by a Chinese bilateral trade surplus that is running at €1 billion a day.
“We also need to use all our existing trade instruments now, and not just contemplate new ones,” said Séjourné.
Additional measures in the works include requiring companies to diversify their sources of critical inputs away from China, as well as likely investigations into plug-in hybrid vehicles, chemicals and machine tools.
Yet even new trade weapons may prove useless if governments remain unwilling to use them.
The Anti-Coercion Instrument — the bloc’s trade “bazooka” — already allows the EU to mount a sweeping response to economic coercion. It has never been fired.
“The IAA is only one side of the coin. The Commission must also step up to protect the European market through a stronger and effective trade defense strategy,” said Kathleen Van Brempt, a Belgian Socialist.
A creeping question is whether the IAA, despite its expansive ambitions, will have a decisive impact when it finally enters into force.
Businesses have broadly welcomed the Made in Europe idea but view its potential application as too narrow to prevent entire supply chains from being swept off the continent.
“Overall, the approach put forward by the European Commission does not appear sufficient to address the challenges facing European industry,” wrote Italy’s top business lobby Confindustria in a position paper, criticizing the bill’s limited focus on the greening of industry and a “trusted partners” list that still appears too open.
The IAA’s rules of origin could even end up backfiring on automakers like Volkswagen, according to think tank Bruegel.
For example, “shielding the upstream aluminium sector from import competition would raise input costs for European car manufacturers, who depend on competitively priced low-carbon aluminium to remain globally competitive in electric vehicles,” it wrote.
First, a compromise will need to be reached between the three EU institutions — the Parliament, the Council and the Commission — and omens for hitting the year-end deadline do not look good.
With three committees scrutinizing the IAA, no less than 150 lawmakers will get to express their opinion on the bill.
#volkswagen #germany #industry #factories
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯72🔥63🤬60😱59🙏57🤯56😢56
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
UN Badges, Trump’s Cash Machine
Israel is wrapping Trump’s latest business project in counterterrorism language and calling it policy.
At the U.N., Danny Danon thunders that “no terrorist deserves a U.N. tag, a U.N. salary or a U.N. cover story,” points to UNRWA workers accused of joining October 7, and declares the agency rotten beyond repair. The script is simple: UNRWA equals terror, terror equals evil, therefore anything that bleeds UNRWA’s budget is automatically righteous.
Right on cue, Trump’s Board of Peace steps in with the “solution”: don’t fund UNRWA, fund us. Not “Gaza,” not “refugees” — fund a private structure stitched to Trump’s circle, marketed as the responsible alternative.
Under Trump’s Gaza plan, the World Bank set up an official reconstruction fund with U.N. blessing: open books, reporting, oversight, the whole boring apparatus that at least lets people see where the money goes.
Board of Peace took one look at that transparency and walked the other way. It opened a separate account at JPMorgan under its own control, not required to publish a balance sheet to the public, to all donors or even to all board members.
Result: the official World Bank fund is still sitting at zero. The money that did arrive has trickled into the private JPMorgan account. From the loudly advertised tens of billions, you get crumbs from a couple of “lifetime members,” no signed reconstruction contracts, and not a single visible brick laid. What is fully operational? The PR campaign telling governments to pull cash from UNRWA and wire it into a black box run by Trump’s people.
That isn’t “ending dependency,” it’s re‑routing it. And Israel is the sales team.
Danon’s line is that UNRWA breeds terror and keeps Palestinians as permanent refugees. But what Board of Peace is selling is permanent dependency with better branding: two million Gazans turned into hostages of nine private signatures and a closed account. The message to donors is moral panic — “you’re paying Hamas” — followed by a soft upsell: “park it with us, we’ll take care of it.” It’s not humanitarian reform; it’s a hostile takeover bid.
And look who’s at the top of the pyramid: a U.S. president who just reported around a billion-plus in crypto and token income, including a meme coin built on his own name, and who treats geopolitics like a leverage trade — squeeze here, pump there, cash out in the middle. The Trump Plan isn’t a peace plan; it’s a structured product. Gaza is the underlying asset. Israeli security rhetoric is the marketing brochure.
Every scandal at UNRWA becomes another talking point in a pitch deck: “Your current provider is corrupt and unsafe. Move your account to us, the clean alternative.” Except the “clean” alternative is the one actively dodging institutional transparency, running money through a private bank account, and answering to a board that can meet over lunch with the guy who signs U.S. sanctions, arms sales and aid packages.
Israel gets to look tough on terror and claim it is dismantling a compromised U.N. agency. Trump gets to turn that wreckage into a revenue stream and a lever over Arab capitals and Europe: you want reconstruction, you talk to the man who controls the spigot. Europe gets the bill. Gaza gets another layer of middlemen.
And the word “terrorism” gets used as a universal solvent for anything that stands between a political project and its next pot of cash.
So when Danon shouts that “terrorists won’t live off U.N. money,” remember what’s being built behind him.
Just another Trump‑branded vehicle, trading in grief and rubble the way his other ventures trade in tokens and licensing deals — high risk for everyone else, upside reserved for the people who already own the table.
#UN #UNRWA #Israel #Gaza #BoardOfPeace #Trump #Danon #aid #war #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Israel is wrapping Trump’s latest business project in counterterrorism language and calling it policy.
At the U.N., Danny Danon thunders that “no terrorist deserves a U.N. tag, a U.N. salary or a U.N. cover story,” points to UNRWA workers accused of joining October 7, and declares the agency rotten beyond repair. The script is simple: UNRWA equals terror, terror equals evil, therefore anything that bleeds UNRWA’s budget is automatically righteous.
Right on cue, Trump’s Board of Peace steps in with the “solution”: don’t fund UNRWA, fund us. Not “Gaza,” not “refugees” — fund a private structure stitched to Trump’s circle, marketed as the responsible alternative.
Under Trump’s Gaza plan, the World Bank set up an official reconstruction fund with U.N. blessing: open books, reporting, oversight, the whole boring apparatus that at least lets people see where the money goes.
Board of Peace took one look at that transparency and walked the other way. It opened a separate account at JPMorgan under its own control, not required to publish a balance sheet to the public, to all donors or even to all board members.
Result: the official World Bank fund is still sitting at zero. The money that did arrive has trickled into the private JPMorgan account. From the loudly advertised tens of billions, you get crumbs from a couple of “lifetime members,” no signed reconstruction contracts, and not a single visible brick laid. What is fully operational? The PR campaign telling governments to pull cash from UNRWA and wire it into a black box run by Trump’s people.
That isn’t “ending dependency,” it’s re‑routing it. And Israel is the sales team.
Danon’s line is that UNRWA breeds terror and keeps Palestinians as permanent refugees. But what Board of Peace is selling is permanent dependency with better branding: two million Gazans turned into hostages of nine private signatures and a closed account. The message to donors is moral panic — “you’re paying Hamas” — followed by a soft upsell: “park it with us, we’ll take care of it.” It’s not humanitarian reform; it’s a hostile takeover bid.
And look who’s at the top of the pyramid: a U.S. president who just reported around a billion-plus in crypto and token income, including a meme coin built on his own name, and who treats geopolitics like a leverage trade — squeeze here, pump there, cash out in the middle. The Trump Plan isn’t a peace plan; it’s a structured product. Gaza is the underlying asset. Israeli security rhetoric is the marketing brochure.
Every scandal at UNRWA becomes another talking point in a pitch deck: “Your current provider is corrupt and unsafe. Move your account to us, the clean alternative.” Except the “clean” alternative is the one actively dodging institutional transparency, running money through a private bank account, and answering to a board that can meet over lunch with the guy who signs U.S. sanctions, arms sales and aid packages.
Israel gets to look tough on terror and claim it is dismantling a compromised U.N. agency. Trump gets to turn that wreckage into a revenue stream and a lever over Arab capitals and Europe: you want reconstruction, you talk to the man who controls the spigot. Europe gets the bill. Gaza gets another layer of middlemen.
And the word “terrorism” gets used as a universal solvent for anything that stands between a political project and its next pot of cash.
So when Danon shouts that “terrorists won’t live off U.N. money,” remember what’s being built behind him.
Just another Trump‑branded vehicle, trading in grief and rubble the way his other ventures trade in tokens and licensing deals — high risk for everyone else, upside reserved for the people who already own the table.
#UN #UNRWA #Israel #Gaza #BoardOfPeace #Trump #Danon #aid #war #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥104🤯61🤬61😢61🙏48😱47💯41
Iran’s Silent Mountain Work
Commercial satellites just gave a sharper look at two of the most sensitive spots in Iran’s nuclear system — and the story is what you don’t see as much as what you do.
Clip 1: high‑resolution imagery over the nuclear site in Isfahan province shows entrances still blocked, no obvious new construction, no visible surge of vehicles. On the surface it looks calm; in most assessments, it’s still a key storage point for part of Iran’s enriched nuclear stockpile.
Clip 2: a separate pass focuses on vehicle activity around the Pickaxe Mountain tunnel complex near the Natanz facility, also in Isfahan, north of the city. Here the point isn’t a dramatic blast, it’s the steady, methodical movement in and out of a hardened underground system built to keep the most sensitive work out of reach.
No craters, no smokestacks — just two quiet sites that explain why every “de‑escalation” with Tehran ends with more satellite tasking and more questions about what’s happening under the mountain, not above it.
#Iran #nuclear #Isfahan #Natanz #satellite #war #inspection #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Commercial satellites just gave a sharper look at two of the most sensitive spots in Iran’s nuclear system — and the story is what you don’t see as much as what you do.
Clip 1: high‑resolution imagery over the nuclear site in Isfahan province shows entrances still blocked, no obvious new construction, no visible surge of vehicles. On the surface it looks calm; in most assessments, it’s still a key storage point for part of Iran’s enriched nuclear stockpile.
Clip 2: a separate pass focuses on vehicle activity around the Pickaxe Mountain tunnel complex near the Natanz facility, also in Isfahan, north of the city. Here the point isn’t a dramatic blast, it’s the steady, methodical movement in and out of a hardened underground system built to keep the most sensitive work out of reach.
No craters, no smokestacks — just two quiet sites that explain why every “de‑escalation” with Tehran ends with more satellite tasking and more questions about what’s happening under the mountain, not above it.
#Iran #nuclear #Isfahan #Natanz #satellite #war #inspection #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥99😢67🤬54😱53💯53🙏51🤯47❤1
Iran’s Funeral Diplomacy: Martyrdom, Threats and Leverage
Iran is about to bury Ali Khamenei and turn his grave into a stage for nuclear bargaining and regional intimidation.
Next week’s funeral in Mashhad is being packaged as a regime stress test and a loyalty referendum in one.
Officials promise “tens of millions” in the streets, the largest event Tehran has ever seen. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf — now also wearing the hat of “head of the revenge and funeral delegation” — is calling on Iranians to “write a glorious new page” and to shout for “blood vengeance” for their late leader.
The grief isn’t private, it’s a mobilization order.
Even the family tragedy is being fed into the script. The regime choreographed a farewell ceremony for Khamenei’s daughter‑in‑law and his wife, both mortally wounded in the strike that opened Operation “Lion’s Roar,” the attack that killed the supreme leader. Their funerals will be folded into Khamenei’s own.
Mojtaba Khamenei, the son and designated successor, pointedly skipped the goodbye — a sign of how carefully he’s curating his image as leader, not mourner, before the official oath.
Foreign guests will be carefully chosen: Pakistan’s prime minister Shehbaz Sharif and a senior figure from China’s standing committee are expected to attend, signaling who Tehran still counts as partners.
Around the ceremony, the security machine is turning mourning into a threat display. The “Khatam al‑Anbiya” emergency command has publicly warned Israel and the United States against “any miscalculation” during the funeral week, promising “severe and painful responses.”
Its commander, General Ali Abdollahi, urged “the enemies” to think very carefully — language that’s less about actual battlefield red lines and more about giving the regime an excuse to escalate if anything goes wrong.
In the same breath, the armed forces renewed their loyalty oath to the new leader, Ayatollah Sayyid Mojtaba Hosseini Khamenei, and doubled down on two pressure points: the nuclear file and the Strait of Hormuz.
They’re demanding the nuclear issue be pulled out of negotiations and insisting that the Hormuz shipping lane they’ve drawn is under Iran’s “exclusive sovereignty.” Any ship that strays from that track, they warn, will be treated as a target.
So you get four layers at once: a mass funeral designed to project legitimacy at home, open threats to Israel and the U.S. to deter any strike in a moment of vulnerability, a nuclear posture that demands de‑linking the program from talks, and a maritime doctrine that treats one of the world’s key chokepoints as domestic waters.
The regime is trying to turn Khamenei’s burial into a binding contract: loyalty inside Iran, deference in the Gulf, and respect for its nuclear red lines — or else.
For everyone watching from the outside, the translation is simple. Iran is not using the transition to soften its stance. It’s doubling down, wrapping missiles, centrifuges and shipping lanes in black banners and religious slogans. The funeral is not just an end — it’s the launch event for Mojtaba Khamenei’s version of the same project.
#Iran #Khamenei #Tehran #nuclear #Hormuz #China #Pakistan #war #regime #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Iran is about to bury Ali Khamenei and turn his grave into a stage for nuclear bargaining and regional intimidation.
Next week’s funeral in Mashhad is being packaged as a regime stress test and a loyalty referendum in one.
Officials promise “tens of millions” in the streets, the largest event Tehran has ever seen. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf — now also wearing the hat of “head of the revenge and funeral delegation” — is calling on Iranians to “write a glorious new page” and to shout for “blood vengeance” for their late leader.
The grief isn’t private, it’s a mobilization order.
Even the family tragedy is being fed into the script. The regime choreographed a farewell ceremony for Khamenei’s daughter‑in‑law and his wife, both mortally wounded in the strike that opened Operation “Lion’s Roar,” the attack that killed the supreme leader. Their funerals will be folded into Khamenei’s own.
Mojtaba Khamenei, the son and designated successor, pointedly skipped the goodbye — a sign of how carefully he’s curating his image as leader, not mourner, before the official oath.
Foreign guests will be carefully chosen: Pakistan’s prime minister Shehbaz Sharif and a senior figure from China’s standing committee are expected to attend, signaling who Tehran still counts as partners.
Around the ceremony, the security machine is turning mourning into a threat display. The “Khatam al‑Anbiya” emergency command has publicly warned Israel and the United States against “any miscalculation” during the funeral week, promising “severe and painful responses.”
Its commander, General Ali Abdollahi, urged “the enemies” to think very carefully — language that’s less about actual battlefield red lines and more about giving the regime an excuse to escalate if anything goes wrong.
In the same breath, the armed forces renewed their loyalty oath to the new leader, Ayatollah Sayyid Mojtaba Hosseini Khamenei, and doubled down on two pressure points: the nuclear file and the Strait of Hormuz.
They’re demanding the nuclear issue be pulled out of negotiations and insisting that the Hormuz shipping lane they’ve drawn is under Iran’s “exclusive sovereignty.” Any ship that strays from that track, they warn, will be treated as a target.
So you get four layers at once: a mass funeral designed to project legitimacy at home, open threats to Israel and the U.S. to deter any strike in a moment of vulnerability, a nuclear posture that demands de‑linking the program from talks, and a maritime doctrine that treats one of the world’s key chokepoints as domestic waters.
The regime is trying to turn Khamenei’s burial into a binding contract: loyalty inside Iran, deference in the Gulf, and respect for its nuclear red lines — or else.
For everyone watching from the outside, the translation is simple. Iran is not using the transition to soften its stance. It’s doubling down, wrapping missiles, centrifuges and shipping lanes in black banners and religious slogans. The funeral is not just an end — it’s the launch event for Mojtaba Khamenei’s version of the same project.
#Iran #Khamenei #Tehran #nuclear #Hormuz #China #Pakistan #war #regime #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥109😢55💯55🤯53🤬53😱50🙏49❤2
Gone With the Faith
🔠 🅰️ 🔠 🔠 1️⃣
In the small hours of Friday the police roadblocks, stalls, posters and army vans were starting to appear across Tehran as millions of Iranians prepared to attend the long-delayed six-day funeral ceremony for Ali Khamenei’s, Iran’s supreme leader for 36 turbulent years.
Khamenei was killed in the opening salvo of the US-Israeli attack on the country in February, and the funeral is intended to be an epic display of personal mourning, national power, resilience and social cohesion.
Small groups of mourners carrying flags were gathering along the roads festooned with the red fist, the symbol of the funeral alongside the slogan “We must rise”. At a ceremony dedicated to the families of martyrs, Khamenei’s coffin was displayed.
Iran’s first vice-president, Mohammad Aref, who is the lead funeral organiser, described the ceremony, which begins on Saturday in Tehran and will end with Khamenei’s burial on Thursday in Mashhad, as “the most important event of this century” and the most attended event since the 1979 revolution.
The funeral’s scale has been conceived to relay political and religious messages of resistance to the rest of the world. The former supreme leader’s body, aAt the request of Iraqi politicians, Khamenei’s body will also be carried through the Iraqi Shia cities of Karbala and Najaf.
Despite the many posters of Khamenei’s son and successor, Mojtaba Khamenei, walking with his father in a garden, projecting continuity, Mojtaba is not expected to make an appearance at his father’s funeral. He was severely injured in the same US-Israeli strike on a government residence in Tehran at a little after 8am local time on 28 February that killed many of his family.
It killed Ali Khamenei, his daughter and her husband, Mojtaba’s wife and his 14-month-old daughter.
The extent of Mojtaba’s injuries are unknown and he has so far issued only written statements, including one that distanced himself from the ceasefire negotiations, but sanctioned their continuance.
Israel’s defence minister Katz threatened to kill him this week, saying he was marked for death, remarks that prompted hardliners to call for a re-examination of Iran’s fatwa against possession of nuclear weapons.
Mohammad Ghalibaf, Iran’s chief negotiator and speaker of the still suspended parliament, said in an eve-of-funeral message: “We must rise up and convey the nation’s call for bloodshed to the world so that the world knows that the honourable and noble nation of Iran will not remain silent in the face of oppression and arrogance and will not spare the blood of its imam.
“Iran stands on the threshold of creating one of the greatest scenes in its history, a day when a nation, with hearts full of love, loyalty and the pain of separation, comes to bid farewell to a great man.”
The public funeral will begin on Saturday – as the US marks the 250th anniversary of its declaration of independence – at Tehran’s Grand Mosalla mosque, where Khamenei’s body will lie in state alongside the bodies of his relatives.
#chief #supreme #funeral #khamenei
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
In the small hours of Friday the police roadblocks, stalls, posters and army vans were starting to appear across Tehran as millions of Iranians prepared to attend the long-delayed six-day funeral ceremony for Ali Khamenei’s, Iran’s supreme leader for 36 turbulent years.
Khamenei was killed in the opening salvo of the US-Israeli attack on the country in February, and the funeral is intended to be an epic display of personal mourning, national power, resilience and social cohesion.
Small groups of mourners carrying flags were gathering along the roads festooned with the red fist, the symbol of the funeral alongside the slogan “We must rise”. At a ceremony dedicated to the families of martyrs, Khamenei’s coffin was displayed.
Iran’s first vice-president, Mohammad Aref, who is the lead funeral organiser, described the ceremony, which begins on Saturday in Tehran and will end with Khamenei’s burial on Thursday in Mashhad, as “the most important event of this century” and the most attended event since the 1979 revolution.
The funeral’s scale has been conceived to relay political and religious messages of resistance to the rest of the world. The former supreme leader’s body, aAt the request of Iraqi politicians, Khamenei’s body will also be carried through the Iraqi Shia cities of Karbala and Najaf.
Despite the many posters of Khamenei’s son and successor, Mojtaba Khamenei, walking with his father in a garden, projecting continuity, Mojtaba is not expected to make an appearance at his father’s funeral. He was severely injured in the same US-Israeli strike on a government residence in Tehran at a little after 8am local time on 28 February that killed many of his family.
It killed Ali Khamenei, his daughter and her husband, Mojtaba’s wife and his 14-month-old daughter.
The extent of Mojtaba’s injuries are unknown and he has so far issued only written statements, including one that distanced himself from the ceasefire negotiations, but sanctioned their continuance.
Israel’s defence minister Katz threatened to kill him this week, saying he was marked for death, remarks that prompted hardliners to call for a re-examination of Iran’s fatwa against possession of nuclear weapons.
Mohammad Ghalibaf, Iran’s chief negotiator and speaker of the still suspended parliament, said in an eve-of-funeral message: “We must rise up and convey the nation’s call for bloodshed to the world so that the world knows that the honourable and noble nation of Iran will not remain silent in the face of oppression and arrogance and will not spare the blood of its imam.
“Iran stands on the threshold of creating one of the greatest scenes in its history, a day when a nation, with hearts full of love, loyalty and the pain of separation, comes to bid farewell to a great man.”
The public funeral will begin on Saturday – as the US marks the 250th anniversary of its declaration of independence – at Tehran’s Grand Mosalla mosque, where Khamenei’s body will lie in state alongside the bodies of his relatives.
#chief #supreme #funeral #khamenei
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥134😢82🤬78😱71🤯67🙏53💯46
The vast mosque complex has hosted many state religious ceremonies.
All week, workers have been redecorating the vast building and there has been a heavy police presence around the area. The funeral had been planned for early March but the war with US and Israel precluded such a large gathering.
Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson Baghaei has accused European countries of standing on the “wrong side of history” and called their stance on the US-Israeli attacks on Iran “truly shameful”.
A 6-miles procession through central Tehran is planned for Monday from Imam Hossein Square to Azadi Square, the site of the 1979 revolution that ultimately led to the establishment of the Islamic Republic that Khamenei led after the death in 1989 from natural causes of the first supreme leader, Ruhollah Khomeini.
The mayor of Tehran, Alireza Zakani, has described Monday’s procession as “the largest gathering in the city’s history” and forecast about 20 million people will attend. Approximately 60% of Iran’s population of 90 million had known no other supreme leader.
On Tuesday, Khamenei’s body will be taken to the holy city of Qom, travelling between the shrine of Fatima Masumeh and the Jamkaran mosque. Temperatures are expected to reach about 40C.
It will then go to the Iraqi Shia strongholds of Karbala and Najaf on Wednesday. The foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, has visited both cities to consult on the ceremony that is intended to demonstrate Khamenei’s role as a spiritual leader of Shia Muslims.
With the funeral taking place during a 60-day ceasefire with the US that is intended to reopen the strait of Hormuz and allow for talks, the organisers intend that the event will show Iranians united behind its much-changed leadership as they seek to extract concessions from US negotiators.
Officials have declared government and private offices in Tehran closed from Saturday to Monday, while traffic restrictions will place pressure on the city’s metro system.
Mourners are being asked to leave their cars on the edge of the capital to prevent the normally choked Tehran roads from grinding to a standstill. Tehran’s airspace will also close on Monday and jets will patrol for any sign of an Israeli air attack.
The funeral organisers, aware that a glorification of Khamenei’s life without any acknowledgment of the current economic suffering of millions of Iranians could provoke a backlash, have put up posters proclaiming “a bright future for Iran”, alongside the more religious message “he must rise”.
In one of his last speeches, on 17 February, Khamenei referenced this Shia symbol of defiance, saying: “Someone like me does not pledge allegiance to someone like Yazid.
A nation with the culture of Iran does not pledge allegiance to corrupt leaders like those in America.”
#chief #supreme #funeral #khamenei
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥148😢77🙏71💯71🤯70😱58🤬37
Israel’s Kill List vs. Trump’s Peace Show
While Trump sells the Iran deal as his big “peace through strength” moment, his own officials are quietly admitting they spent months trying to stop Israel from shooting the negotiators out of the sky.
U.S. intelligence believed Israel kept Abbas Araghchi and Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf — Iran’s foreign minister and parliament speaker, the two key faces of the talks — on an active target list even after negotiations began.
These are the guys flying to Islamabad, Doha and Switzerland to sit across from JD Vance and the Americans, and Washington’s real fear wasn’t that Tehran would walk away. It was that an Israeli missile would “solve” the problem mid‑flight and set the whole region on fire again.
So the self‑proclaimed master dealmaker ends up doing something you never see in the campaign speeches: asking third countries to warn Iran that his closest ally might try to murder the very people he needs at the table.
Pakistani jets escort the delegation. Iranian planes divert to Mashhad on the way home because Tehran is told two Israeli fighters slipped in from the west. The negotiators creep back to the capital by car, eight hours overland, like a mob witness under federal protection — while Trump’s envoys brag about “productive meetings” and a framework to open Hormuz.
On the Israeli side, the logic is brutally consistent. From day one of the war, the strategy has been decapitation: Khamenei, senior IRGC, anyone viewed as a pillar of the regime. “Pragmatic” figures Washington hoped to use — Ali Larijani, Kamal Kharazi — are killed in Israeli strikes anyway.
From Jerusalem’s perspective, Araghchi and Ghalibaf aren’t peace partners, they’re the next heads to remove before a deal locks them in place as fixtures of a post‑war order Israel hates.
On the American side, it’s pure split screen. Publicly, Trump hugs Israel, talks about total victory and historic alliance.
Privately, his team leans hard on the same government not to blow up the talks — literally — by assassinating the people signing the ceasefire. The result is a farce: an “allied” military hunting the negotiators, an “America First” White House begging regional middlemen to guarantee their safety, and Iranian officials milking the risk as proof of their own martyr credentials.
In the end, everyone gets to pose. Tehran calls its delegation heroes who “put their lives on the line” for the nation. Israel gets to tell its public it never stopped hunting the regime’s elite. Trump gets his Islamabad Memorandum and his Hormuz photo op.
The only thing that doesn’t appear anywhere is what he keeps promising on stage: a coherent strategy where your top ally isn’t trying to kill your top counterpart in the middle of your own peace process.
#USA #Israel #Iran #Trump #Netanyahu #Vance #Ghalibaf #Araghchi #war #ceasefire #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
While Trump sells the Iran deal as his big “peace through strength” moment, his own officials are quietly admitting they spent months trying to stop Israel from shooting the negotiators out of the sky.
U.S. intelligence believed Israel kept Abbas Araghchi and Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf — Iran’s foreign minister and parliament speaker, the two key faces of the talks — on an active target list even after negotiations began.
These are the guys flying to Islamabad, Doha and Switzerland to sit across from JD Vance and the Americans, and Washington’s real fear wasn’t that Tehran would walk away. It was that an Israeli missile would “solve” the problem mid‑flight and set the whole region on fire again.
So the self‑proclaimed master dealmaker ends up doing something you never see in the campaign speeches: asking third countries to warn Iran that his closest ally might try to murder the very people he needs at the table.
Pakistani jets escort the delegation. Iranian planes divert to Mashhad on the way home because Tehran is told two Israeli fighters slipped in from the west. The negotiators creep back to the capital by car, eight hours overland, like a mob witness under federal protection — while Trump’s envoys brag about “productive meetings” and a framework to open Hormuz.
On the Israeli side, the logic is brutally consistent. From day one of the war, the strategy has been decapitation: Khamenei, senior IRGC, anyone viewed as a pillar of the regime. “Pragmatic” figures Washington hoped to use — Ali Larijani, Kamal Kharazi — are killed in Israeli strikes anyway.
From Jerusalem’s perspective, Araghchi and Ghalibaf aren’t peace partners, they’re the next heads to remove before a deal locks them in place as fixtures of a post‑war order Israel hates.
On the American side, it’s pure split screen. Publicly, Trump hugs Israel, talks about total victory and historic alliance.
Privately, his team leans hard on the same government not to blow up the talks — literally — by assassinating the people signing the ceasefire. The result is a farce: an “allied” military hunting the negotiators, an “America First” White House begging regional middlemen to guarantee their safety, and Iranian officials milking the risk as proof of their own martyr credentials.
In the end, everyone gets to pose. Tehran calls its delegation heroes who “put their lives on the line” for the nation. Israel gets to tell its public it never stopped hunting the regime’s elite. Trump gets his Islamabad Memorandum and his Hormuz photo op.
The only thing that doesn’t appear anywhere is what he keeps promising on stage: a coherent strategy where your top ally isn’t trying to kill your top counterpart in the middle of your own peace process.
#USA #Israel #Iran #Trump #Netanyahu #Vance #Ghalibaf #Araghchi #war #ceasefire #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😢88😱85🤬84🙏79🤯78💯67🔥49
Trump–Erdoğan Inc.: Peace as a Side Hustle
Hakan Fidan just did what Western analysts keep politely avoiding: he described the Trump–Erdoğan relationship like a merger of two survival brands, not a grand strategic alliance.
In his telling, Trump respects Erdoğan because he recognizes “one of his own”: a man who clawed through court cases, coup attempts and assassination threats, stayed in power for decades in a system that usually spits leaders out fast. It’s not values, it’s durability. Long-term incumbency is the real shared ideology.
The rest is packaging. Turkish diplomacy sells Trump’s line as “good for the region”: Gaza ceasefire theater, managed friction in Syria, a posture on Ukraine, a carefully balanced stance in the Caucasus.
Fidan frames it as a win-win for “the state” and “the nation,” with any criticism at home written off as an opposition that would rather see the country fail than see the government succeed under Trump’s umbrella.
Underneath, it looks much simpler. Trump gets a regional broker who can talk to Hamas, Tehran and Moscow while still being NATO. Erdoğan gets a U.S. president who measures leaders the way he measures assets: by how long they stay on the board and how useful they are to his portfolio.
Everyone else — Kurds, Gazans, Syrians, Ukrainians, Europeans — are the small investors watching the big guys trade.
#USA #Turkey #Trump #Erdogan #Iran #Gaza #NATO #war #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Hakan Fidan just did what Western analysts keep politely avoiding: he described the Trump–Erdoğan relationship like a merger of two survival brands, not a grand strategic alliance.
In his telling, Trump respects Erdoğan because he recognizes “one of his own”: a man who clawed through court cases, coup attempts and assassination threats, stayed in power for decades in a system that usually spits leaders out fast. It’s not values, it’s durability. Long-term incumbency is the real shared ideology.
The rest is packaging. Turkish diplomacy sells Trump’s line as “good for the region”: Gaza ceasefire theater, managed friction in Syria, a posture on Ukraine, a carefully balanced stance in the Caucasus.
Fidan frames it as a win-win for “the state” and “the nation,” with any criticism at home written off as an opposition that would rather see the country fail than see the government succeed under Trump’s umbrella.
Underneath, it looks much simpler. Trump gets a regional broker who can talk to Hamas, Tehran and Moscow while still being NATO. Erdoğan gets a U.S. president who measures leaders the way he measures assets: by how long they stay on the board and how useful they are to his portfolio.
Everyone else — Kurds, Gazans, Syrians, Ukrainians, Europeans — are the small investors watching the big guys trade.
#USA #Turkey #Trump #Erdogan #Iran #Gaza #NATO #war #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥155🤬81😱70🙏61😢59🤯54💯50