The Warning, the Denial, the Slogan

A report says Egypt warned Israel repeatedly before October 7. Netanyahu says he never spoke to Egypt’s intelligence chief, received no Egyptian warning through Israeli channels and will sue. The statement ends with an election slogan: “It’s either the Right or Palestine.”

The Wall Street Journal reported that Abbas Kamel, then head of Egypt’s General Intelligence Service, delivered at least three warnings about signs of a Hamas attack.

Its sources said Kamel made a secret visit to Israel about 11 days before October 7, then called Netanyahu days before the attack after earlier warnings drew no response.

Egyptian and Emirati warnings reportedly continued until roughly 48 hours before the massacre, without a precise date or scale of attack.

Netanyahu’s response denies the personal connection, not the existence of Egyptian intelligence. His office said Netanyahu neither met nor spoke with Kamel in the months before October 7, and that no Israeli intelligence official passed him an Egyptian warning. Netanyahu also said he never speaks with a foreign intelligence chief without Israeli intelligence counterparts present.

The Emirates now sit inside the same argument. Haaretz reported that Netanyahu asked UAE President Mohamed bin Zayed during their Abu Dhabi meeting to deny an earlier report that he had warned Netanyahu about Yahya Sinwar’s intentions before October 7. The UAE foreign ministry declined to comment.

Ronen Bar says he will sue Netanyahu for defamation and demand disclosure of documents and the prime minister’s meetings with foreign officials. Netanyahu says foreign and hostile actors, including Arab states, are behind “false blood libels.” The dispute is moving toward a courtroom where the records Netanyahu’s office says do not exist may become the central exhibit.

The prime minister’s promised suit against Haaretz over the Emirati warning has not been filed nearly 20 days after he announced it. Likud officials say the claims over the Emirati and Egyptian warnings will be filed together “very soon.” The practical obstacle is familiar: statements made by a prime minister in the course of official duties usually carry immunity from civil suits.

Egypt says it warned. The UAE allegedly says it warned. Netanyahu says nobody warned him.

#Israel #Netanyahu #October7 #Egypt

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

#ArtificialIntelligence
#Cybersecurity #Cyberattaks

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

The Secret Flight Everyone Could Track

Netanyahu flew to Abu Dhabi, crossed Jordanian and Saudi airspace, met UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed and returned to Israel.

The Shin Bet later filed a censorship complaint against Channel 12 for reporting the trip 49 minutes before the aircraft landed.

The Prime Minister’s Office said the report at 9:38 p.m. endangered Netanyahu, his wife Sara, the operation and personnel on the ground because the plane was still far from Israeli airspace. It landed at 10:27 p.m.

The Shin Bet said the publication exposed operational methods and could endanger future missions; the Mossad called it a serious security threat.

The delegation included Mossad chief David Barnea, National Security Council head Tzachi Hanegbi, military secretary Maj. Gen. Guy Markizano and the Shin Bet’s head of protective security.

The government made the delegation public while arguing that the flight itself had to remain secret.

Flight-tracking data had already placed Netanyahu’s aircraft in Abu Dhabi at 4:13 p.m. local time. A UAE-owned aircraft landed three minutes earlier after departing Riyadh.

A Qatari government aircraft arrived at 4:18 p.m.; an aircraft linked to Libyan commander Khalifa Haftar arrived at 4:28 p.m. The arrivals do not establish a shared meeting or a coordinated operation.

They establish something simpler: Abu Dhabi airport was visible on open-source tracking systems hours before television reported Netanyahu’s return.

The Emirates offered no public account of the Netanyahu meeting.

The visit came as Netanyahu was reportedly seeking a public Emirati denial that Mohammed bin Zayed had warned him before October 7.

The next day, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan visited the UAE.

Israel’s security establishment says Channel 12 exposed a secret method. The method appears to have involved a private aircraft, sovereign airspace and an airport with public flight data.

#Israel #Netanyahu #UAE #Media

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

#UnitedStates #China #Taïwan #Trump

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

#Trump #Illinois #Zelensky

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

Ghalibaf’s Parliament, Evin’s Filing Cabinet

Iran’s parliament is supposed to supervise the state. Hamid Rasaei, a hardline MP, has just been sent to Evin Prison for accusing the speaker of manipulating parliamentary documents. The institution has found an efficient way to resolve oversight: jail the overseer.

Rasaei began a 10-month sentence on September 27 after the Special Court for Clergy convicted him of “publishing falsehoods with intent to harm others.” The case began with a 2024 article in the hardline weekly 9 Dey, then edited by Rasaei, alleging that Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf had manipulated parliamentary documents. The judiciary said the allegation had not been established.

The sentence arrives during a public conservative feud. Mohammad Mehdi Mohammadi, Ghalibaf’s adviser, accused former president Hassan Rouhani and reformist figures of sending a message to Washington that killing another tier of Iranian commanders and leaders could create conditions for internal change.

Cleric and politician Mohammad Mehdi Mirbagheri answered by accusing Ghalibaf of a “political massacre” of lawmakers and of trying to complete control over the media by imprisoning parliamentary critics.

The Iranian state now offers an elegant constitutional formula: a parliament can challenge the executive, provided its members do not challenge the parliamentary speaker. The court decides whether the documents were manipulated. The speaker’s office decides which accusation becomes a prison sentence.

Outside the chamber, students at Tehran’s Allameh Tabataba’i University protested rising tuition, poor dormitory and food conditions, unemployment and compulsory hijab. Their chants joined the price of food with the price of obedience: “Until the mullah is in a shroud, this country will not be a homeland.”

Ghalibaf’s allies say reformists invited foreign pressure. His critics say he is jailing parliamentarians. Students say the entire clerical order has to go. In Tehran, everyone agrees the country has a problem. The argument is over which cell should hold it.

#Iran #Ghalibaf #Parliament #Evin

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

Fairford’s Foreign Actor

Five British men were arrested near RAF Fairford, the British base used by U.S. bombers in missions against Iran. The vans reportedly held no viable explosives. The men were released on bail. Marco Rubio still says a foreign actor was “clearly” involved.

Donald Trump first said the incident “might be” connected to Iran, then said he knew the answer but would not give it. He criticized Britain for releasing the suspects, all British nationals from London in their early 20s. “We know everything about them,” he said.

British counterterrorism police have reached a narrower conclusion. They are examining whether the men acted knowingly or unknowingly for a foreign state. That inquiry includes possible Iranian involvement, but also a Russian sabotage operation and a non-state militant plot. Investigators have not announced a state-backed motive or named a culprit.

The initial alarm centered on three large white vans near the base. A source familiar with the case told Reuters that they did not contain viable explosives; other reporting said no explosive material was found. The five men were arrested on suspicion of explosives and terrorism offenses, then released under strict bail conditions while the investigation continued.

Rubio called the episode “very serious” and said Iran had threatened U.S. assets. That is a relevant threat assessment. It is not public evidence that Iran directed the men outside a Gloucestershire air base.

The police have five British suspects, three vans and no announced bomb. Washington has a foreign actor, an Iranian threat and a presidential claim that it knows the answer.

One side has an investigation. The other has a press conference.

#UnitedKingdom #Iran #Trump #Fairford

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

Chaos at 30,000 Feet: Pilot Fight Sends Israel-Bound Jet Into Emergency Dive 🚨✈️


What began as a routine flight from Dubai to Tel Aviv turned into a terrifying midair emergency Wednesday after a violent confrontation erupted inside the cockpit of a Flydubai passenger jet.

Flight FZ1073, a Boeing 737 bound for Israel with more than 150 passengers aboard, suddenly transmitted a series of emergency signals while flying over the region. One of the codes — 7500 — is internationally used to indicate unlawful interference and is commonly associated with a possible hijacking. Israeli authorities immediately treated the situation as a potential security threat, and fighter jets were scrambled.

The aircraft then changed course toward Saudi Arabia instead of continuing to Tel Aviv. Flight-tracking data showed a dramatic loss of altitude, adding to fears that something catastrophic was unfolding aboard the plane.

The aircraft eventually landed safely at Tabuk airport in northwestern Saudi Arabia. All passengers were reported safe.

But the terrifying scenario was apparently not a hijacking.

According to Israeli officials cited by Reuters, the emergency signals were triggered after the two pilots became involved in a physical fight inside the cockpit. The precise sequence of events remains under investigation.

Other reports have described an even more disturbing scene. Passengers reportedly heard shouting and saw blood, while some accounts claimed that one pilot may have stabbed the other. Those details have not been independently confirmed, and authorities have not publicly established what caused the confrontation or what the pilots intended.

For those on board, however, the distinction between a cockpit fight and a hijacking must have been meaningless in the moment.

The plane was thousands of feet above the ground. A distress code associated with hijacking had been transmitted. The aircraft was changing course, losing altitude and heading toward an emergency landing in a country that has no diplomatic relations with Israel.

Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz were brought into urgent consultations as the security system reacted to the unexplained emergency.

Israeli fighter aircraft were dispatched toward the plane before the situation became clearer.

Flydubai confirmed that its flight had experienced an “incident” while en route to Tel Aviv and had been diverted to Tabuk, where it landed safely. The airline said it was working with the relevant authorities to establish what happened.

The passengers were ultimately spared the worst. But the incident has raised extraordinary questions about what happened inside the cockpit of a commercial aircraft — and how a fight between two pilots could escalate into an emergency serious enough to trigger a hijacking alert and a military response.

For now, investigators face the task of reconstructing those critical minutes in the air.

One thing is already clear: for the passengers aboard FZ1073, a routine journey from Dubai to Israel suddenly became a fight for control at 30,000 feet.

#Flydubai #Israel #Aviation #SaudiArabia

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

Jerusalem’s Draft-Dodger Dividend

Thousands marched through Jerusalem to honor ultra-Orthodox men released from military prison for draft evasion. At the end, each man was promised 1,000 shekels.

The country is extending reserve call-ups while a religious movement puts a cash prize on refusing the draft.

The procession began in Geula and ended near Kikar HaShabbat. About 50 recently released draft evaders attended, though roughly 100 had been invited.

Participants held signs calling the IDF an “enemy army” and demanding the release of “hostages” from Prison 10, the military prison.

The event’s organizers said the money came from donations abroad. Video later showed Rabbi Yehuda Tzadaka handing envelopes to the men, with 1,000 shekels in each.

The cash is neither a salary nor a fine. It is a public reward for choosing the army’s jail over the army.

Yashar! leader Gadi Eisenkot called the coming vote a choice between a “government of draft evasion” and a “Zionist government of enlistment.”

Democrat leader Yair Golan said people were marching through the capital with anti-IDF signs while Netanyahu transfers billions of shekels to their community. Bennett said the Netanyahu-Deri government pays them billions.

Ofer Winter placed the sequence correctly: the evaders received honors in Bnei Brak, then the calls of “enemy army” arrived in Jerusalem. He said the scenes demeaned IDF soldiers.

Avigdor Liberman demanded an immediate investigation into who financed the envelopes and called on Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz to condemn the event that same night.

Israel’s government is asking for authority to keep up to 200,000 reservists under emergency call-up through November. In Jerusalem, a parallel institution handed cash to men whose emergency was refusing to serve.

#Israel #IDF #Haredim #Draft

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

Meta’s AI Tax Bonanza: Billions Saved as Washington Pays the Bill


Meta is pouring billions of dollars into the infrastructure behind the artificial-intelligence boom. At the same time, the company has found a powerful way to reduce its federal tax bill: using tax incentives designed to encourage investment in research, development and capital infrastructure.

The result is striking. Meta reported a federal income-tax rate of just over 3.5% for 2025, its lowest rate since Facebook went public. Its federal tax bill fell to roughly $2.8 billion, compared with about $9.6 billion the previous year, even as its domestic profits climbed to roughly $79.6 billion.

Meta is not alone. Amazon and Alphabet also reported sharply lower tax bills as they accelerated spending on AI infrastructure, servers, chips and data centers.

Amazon’s federal tax bill fell from about $9 billion in 2024 to roughly $1.2 billion in 2025, while Alphabet’s combined federal and state tax figure declined from about $21.1 billion to $13.8 billion.

Much of the change is linked to the tax legislation signed by President Donald Trump in 2025. The law expanded or restored deductions allowing companies to write off certain capital investments and research expenses more quickly. For technology companies racing to build enormous AI computing networks, those provisions can translate into billions of dollars in tax savings or deferred payments.

Meta’s AI expansion is therefore doing double duty: increasing the company’s computing capacity while generating expenses that can reduce its taxable income.

There is, however, an important distinction. Lower taxes today do not necessarily mean those taxes disappear forever. Some provisions effectively push tax payments into future years. Meta reported more than $18 billion in deferred taxes for 2025.

Supporters argue that accelerated deductions encourage companies to invest in American technology, infrastructure and research rather than shifting those investments overseas. Critics counter that the incentives are increasingly benefiting some of the world’s most profitable corporations on a massive scale.

The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy estimates that Meta, Amazon and Alphabet collectively reduced their federal tax payments by nearly $50 billion in 2025 compared with what they would have owed at the statutory 21% corporate rate.

That is an advocacy group’s calculation, rather than an amount determined by the IRS.

The controversy is about more than accounting. AI data centers have become one of the biggest engines of corporate investment, with individual facilities costing billions of dollars. They also consume enormous amounts of electricity and, depending on their cooling systems, significant quantities of water.

That leaves Washington facing a difficult question: when Congress creates tax breaks to stimulate innovation, where is the line between encouraging investment and subsidizing the expansion of already enormously profitable technology companies?

For Meta, the answer is increasingly visible in its balance sheet. The company is spending aggressively on AI — and the tax code is helping make that expansion substantially cheaper.

#Meta #ArtificialIntelligence #BigTech #Taxes

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

💲💥Qatar’s Bad Investment

Benjamin Netanyahu told the UN that Qatar spent “untold billions” spreading lies about Israel.

Qatar’s prime minister answered with the kind of return-on-investment calculation no lobbying firm wants to publish.

If that had been Doha’s goal, Qatar should be receiving American aid, immunity and protection. Instead, it got attacked.

Netanyahu accused Qatar of spending decades funding American universities and “toxic media outlets like Al Jazeera” to “brainwash young minds” against Israel, America and the West.

Qatar rejects the allegation. Doha says most of its U.S.-university spending supports American branch campuses in Qatar’s Education City, rather than political influence in the United States.

Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani told Piers Morgan that, if Qatar’s investments had been meant to buy influence in Washington, the country had received an absurdly poor return.

Qatar would be the chief recipient of U.S. assistance, he said. It would never be attacked. Its strategic security would be guaranteed. “It was a very bad investment, if that was the purpose of it.”

Then he supplied the detail that makes the joke land. Al Thani said the White House informed him that the U.S.-Israeli campaign against Iran was beginning only minutes to half an hour before it started.

Qatar hosts the largest U.S. military base in the Middle East. Its government learned that a regional war was about to begin on a notice shorter than a late dinner reservation.

Bennett called Al Thani “a terrorist in a suit,” promised to declare Qatar an enemy state, remove “Qatari agents” from the Prime Minister’s Office and drive Qatar out of Israel and Gaza.

Al Thani calls Netanyahu a war criminal and insists that Qatari aid to Gaza was transferred at Israel’s request and under U.S. coordination.

An earlier Yedioth Ahronoth and Ynet investigation concluded that some Qatari funds officially described as humanitarian were diverted to Hamas, including funds that helped cover about half the military wing’s budget. Qatar denies the broader allegation.

Qatar hosts Hamas leaders, mediates with Hamas, hosts the U.S. military and receives warnings from Washington just before war begins. Netanyahu says this is hostile influence. Al Thani says it is a bad investment. Both descriptions can fit the same business model.

#Qatar #Israel #Netanyahu #Bennett

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

The Strait of Trump™

Trump says Iran is “in a very bad situation” and will eventually give up. Qatar’s mediators spent the UN week trying to make Washington and Tehran speak to each other.

The talks hit a wall because Iran wants terms the United States will not accept, while U.S. officials see little reason to compromise.

Washington then sanctioned eight entities and five people tied to Iran’s weapons procurement, while offering up to $15 million for information on the IRGC’s money system and three missile-and-space commanders. Peace talks, but with a bounty menu.

Trump also claimed the United States had moved more oil through the Strait of Hormuz in recent days than at any point in history. A president measuring diplomacy in barrels is not trying to end a war. He is selling the war’s shipping report.

Iran wants sanctions relief. Trump wants surrender. Qatar wants the Strait reopened before everybody discovers what an oil panic costs at the pump. The negotiators call it diplomacy. The market calls it a hostage situation with tankers.

#Iran #Trump #Qatar #Hormuz

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

The White House’s Robot Babysitter

Trump gathered the men building the machines that may outthink governments and signed a voluntary pact for them to supervise themselves.

Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Sundar Pichai, Jensen Huang, Greg Brockman and Dario Amodei joined the ceremony. The document is called “The White House Accord on Superintelligence.”

Its plan is elegantly American: each company builds internal controls, appoints internal monitors, hires an outside auditor and sends the results to its own board.

The industry gets four layers of oversight, all ultimately paid by the industry. Trump called it “morally binding,” not legally binding. The White House calls that a constitution. Wall Street calls it governance.

The pact tells companies to stop advanced AI from entering computer systems it was not intended to access. It asks the makers of potentially uncontrollable software to promise that the software will behave, then asks the makers to grade their own promise.

Anthropic came to the White House having warned prospective IPO investors that advanced AI may pose “catastrophic or existential risks to humanity.”

Its prospectus says models could resist shutdown, conceal or manipulate information, and display behavior resembling blackmail.

The company selling the fire alarm helped sign the agreement saying the fire alarm company will inspect the building.

Trump’s answer to machine intelligence is corporate self-regulation with a presidential autograph. The boardroom already had a seat at the table. Now it has custody of the robot.

#AI #Trump #Anthropic #BigTech

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

China’s Yemen Assembly Line

The Houthis no longer need to wait for Iran to deliver a finished missile in a fishing boat.

China is supplying the parts catalog: dual-use electronics, industrial machines, engines and drone equipment.

All of that arrive as commercial cargo and can become missiles or attack drones after a short trip through a Yemeni workshop.

The old supply chain was Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, small boats and weapons shipments headed for Yemen’s coast.

Much of it was intercepted. The newer model is harder to stop because a CNC machine, a radio transmitter or a drone engine can plausibly be sold as civilian equipment until it lands in Houthi hands.

U.S. and UN-linked findings cited by reporting say Chinese firms have become the largest source of seized material bound for the group, with Chinese-origin dual-use goods accounting for more than 70% of prohibited or restricted items intercepted from January 2025 through April 2026.

That turns the Houthi arsenal into an import business. Iran supplies expertise, designs and political cover.

Chinese exporters supply the parts. Yemen supplies cheap labor and a coastline built for smuggling.

Every container that clears customs is another installment in a local missile factory.

On Wednesday, the Houthis said they shot down a Saudi ScanEagle surveillance drone above Saada. They described it as a Boeing-made aircraft worth about $11.25 million. Insitu, the ScanEagle maker, is a Boeing subsidiary.

A $11 million drone versus a warehouse of consumer-grade components: this is the Red Sea’s business model. The United States and Saudi Arabia sell the hardware. Iran and China sell the repair kit. The Houthis supply the demonstration.

#Houthis #China #Iran #RedSea

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

The Two-Minute Security Briefing

Netanyahu warned that Israel’s enemies may attack before the election. Lapid received a 30-minute classified briefing, said the military, Shin Bet and police were ready, and told the public not to panic. Likud’s reply was that he posted the statement two minutes after leaving.

The briefing included Netanyahu, Lapid, the military secretary and the military secretary’s intelligence officer. The Prime Minister’s Office said the intelligence presentation gave detailed warnings of possible attacks on multiple fronts before the election. It offered no public details on the threats.

Before the meeting, Lapid and Bennett had focused on a different warning: the IDF’s manpower shortage. Bennett said Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir had raised 10 red flags over a shortage of 20,000 combat soldiers. Lapid later used the figure of 15,000 ultra-Orthodox men “missing” from the IDF. The numbers describe the same political failure from different ends: an army asked to prepare for several fronts while the coalition preserves mass draft exemptions.

Lapid said Israel’s security agencies were prepared for the vote and that “there is no reason to put the public into panic.” He added that security threats must be handled professionally and that “Israel’s security and IDF bases are not props for election campaign videos.”

Likud did not dispute Lapid’s claim about readiness. It disputed his typing speed. The party said he left at 23:39 and issued his statement at 23:41, so he either writes “at the speed of light” or prepared his response before the briefing.

Meanwhile, the government is set to extend the legal framework for up to 200,000 reserve call-ups through November 30, down from the 240,000 authorized through the end of September. The estimated cost is 6.6 billion shekels. Israel has enough reserve orders for a large war. It is still arguing over whether it has enough soldiers for one.

Netanyahu says there are threats. Lapid says the public is safe. The coalition keeps the draft exemptions. The only uncontested intelligence is that somebody wrote a press release before midnight.

#Israel #Netanyahu #Lapid #IDF

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

Trump’s Russia Gamble: Prisoners for Sanctions Relief 🏛


The Trump administration is considering an unusual bargain with Moscow: Russia could release political prisoners, while Washington would respond by easing some economic sanctions. According to reporting in The Atlantic, the idea was presented to Trump by his envoy John Coale, who has pursued a similar approach with Belarus.

The proposal reflects a distinctly transactional style of diplomacy. Rather than waiting for a comprehensive settlement of the war in Ukraine, Washington could seek a limited agreement with the Kremlin that produces a visible humanitarian concession while opening the door to broader economic negotiations.

Coale has already used a comparable strategy with Belarus, where the release of political prisoners was linked to sanctions relief. The Russian proposal would take that model into a far more consequential arena.

If Moscow agreed to release prisoners in exchange for sanctions relief, the arrangement could become an opening for renewed U.S.-Russian economic contacts. Energy, commodities and other areas currently constrained by sanctions could eventually become part of a broader conversation, while American companies could once again examine opportunities in the Russian market.

For Trump, such a deal could offer a tangible diplomatic achievement even while the larger Russia-Ukraine conflict remains unresolved.

But the proposal carries major political risks. Ukraine has consistently opposed sanctions relief for Russia while the war continues.

Zelensky has argued that sanctions should remain in place until Moscow ends its aggression. Any unilateral American move to ease restrictions could therefore create another serious dispute between Washington and Kyiv.

European allies and some members of Congress could also object to separating sanctions relief from a broader settlement of the war. The question is particularly sensitive because economic pressure remains one of the principal tools available to the United States and its allies.

The plan is still at an early stage. There is no final agreement with Moscow, and it remains unclear which prisoners could be released, what sanctions might be lifted, or what conditions Washington would impose.

The economic dimension is equally significant. Jared Kushner has reportedly discussed with Russian officials the business opportunities that could emerge after a potential peace agreement, including the possibility of renewed American-Russian commercial cooperation.

That points to a broader vision of diplomacy: not simply ending the fighting, but rebuilding economic ties that were severed or sharply restricted after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

For Moscow, sanctions relief would provide an immediate economic incentive. For Washington, the release of political prisoners could offer a concrete humanitarian result. For Trump, a deal could be presented as evidence that direct negotiation and transactional diplomacy can produce concessions from the Kremlin.

But the central obstacle remains the war itself. A prisoner-for-sanctions arrangement would not resolve the territorial, security and political disputes between Russia and Ukraine. It would be a limited bargain, not a peace settlement.

For now, Washington appears to be exploring a radically different approach to Moscow — one based on immediate exchanges, concrete concessions and the promise of larger economic opportunities.

Whether the Kremlin would accept such a bargain remains uncertain. But if the idea moves forward, it could become an important test of Trump’s strategy toward Russia and a new source of tension between Washington, Kyiv and its European allies.

#Trump #Russia #Ukraine #Sanctions

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸