πEvolution of Education Policy
β University Education Commission (1948-49)
β Secondary Education Commission (1952-53)
β Education Commission (1964-66) under Dr. D.S. Kothari
β National Policy on Education, 1968
β 42nd Constitutional Amendment,1976-Education in Concurrent List
β National Policy on Education (NPE), 1986
β NPE 1986 Modified in 1992 (Program of Action, 1992)
β T.S.R. Subramaniam Committee Report (27 May, 2016)
β Dr. K. Kasturirangan Committee Report (31 May, 2019)
β New Education Policy 2020
#revision_notes
#Prelim
#modern_history
#Education
Join @CSE_EXAM
β University Education Commission (1948-49)
β Secondary Education Commission (1952-53)
β Education Commission (1964-66) under Dr. D.S. Kothari
β National Policy on Education, 1968
β 42nd Constitutional Amendment,1976-Education in Concurrent List
β National Policy on Education (NPE), 1986
β NPE 1986 Modified in 1992 (Program of Action, 1992)
β T.S.R. Subramaniam Committee Report (27 May, 2016)
β Dr. K. Kasturirangan Committee Report (31 May, 2019)
β New Education Policy 2020
#revision_notes
#Prelim
#modern_history
#Education
Join @CSE_EXAM
πReport of All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) 2019-20
β This Report provides key performance indicators on the current status of Higher education in the country. In the last five years from 2015-16 to 2019-20, there has been a growth of 11.4% in the student enrolment.
β The rise in female enrolment in higher education during the period is 18.2%.
β Total Enrolment in Higher Education stands at 3.85 crorein 2019-20 as compared to 3.74 crore in 2018-19, registering a growth of 11.36 lakh (3.04 %). Total enrolment was 3.42 crore in 2014-15.
β Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER), the percentage of students belonging to the eligible age group enrolled in Higher Education, in 2019-20 is 27.1% against 26.3% in 2018-19 and 24.3% in 2014-2015.
β Gender Parity Index (GPI) in Higher Education in 2019-20 is 1.01 against 1.00 in 2018-19 indicating an improvement in the relative access to higher education for females of eligible age group compared to males.
β Pupil Teacher Ratio in Higher Education in 2019-20 is 26.
β 3.38 crore Students enrolled in programmes at under-graduate and post-graduate level. Out of these, nearly 85% of the students (2.85 crore) were enrolled in the six major disciplines such as Humanities, Science, Commerce, Engineering & Technology, Medical Science and IT & Computer.
β The number of students pursuing PhD in 2019-20 is 2.03 lakh against 1.17 lakh in 2014-15.
β The Total Number of Teachers stands at 15,03,156 comprising of 57.5% male and 42.5% female.
#mains
#gs2
#education
PIB
Join @CSE_EXAM
β This Report provides key performance indicators on the current status of Higher education in the country. In the last five years from 2015-16 to 2019-20, there has been a growth of 11.4% in the student enrolment.
β The rise in female enrolment in higher education during the period is 18.2%.
β Total Enrolment in Higher Education stands at 3.85 crorein 2019-20 as compared to 3.74 crore in 2018-19, registering a growth of 11.36 lakh (3.04 %). Total enrolment was 3.42 crore in 2014-15.
β Gross Enrolment Ratio (GER), the percentage of students belonging to the eligible age group enrolled in Higher Education, in 2019-20 is 27.1% against 26.3% in 2018-19 and 24.3% in 2014-2015.
β Gender Parity Index (GPI) in Higher Education in 2019-20 is 1.01 against 1.00 in 2018-19 indicating an improvement in the relative access to higher education for females of eligible age group compared to males.
β Pupil Teacher Ratio in Higher Education in 2019-20 is 26.
β 3.38 crore Students enrolled in programmes at under-graduate and post-graduate level. Out of these, nearly 85% of the students (2.85 crore) were enrolled in the six major disciplines such as Humanities, Science, Commerce, Engineering & Technology, Medical Science and IT & Computer.
β The number of students pursuing PhD in 2019-20 is 2.03 lakh against 1.17 lakh in 2014-15.
β The Total Number of Teachers stands at 15,03,156 comprising of 57.5% male and 42.5% female.
#mains
#gs2
#education
PIB
Join @CSE_EXAM
πEducation Minister Releases Report on united district information system for education plus(udise+) 2019-20
β What is the News?
The Union Education Minister has released the report on United Information System for Education Plus(UDISE+) 2019-20 for School Education in India.
βͺοΈAbout UDISE:
β Unified District Information on School Education(UDISE) is one of the largest Management Information Systems on school education.
β UDISE was initiated in 2012-13 by the Ministry of Education by integrating DISE for elementary education and SEMIS for secondary education.
β Purpose: It helps measure the education parameters from classes 1 to 12 in government and private schools across India.
β UDISE+ is an updated and improved version of UDISE. It was developed in the year 2018-19 to speed up data entry, reduce errors, improve data quality and ease its verification.
β The present publication relates to the data for the reference year 2019-20.
Key Findings of the Report:
βͺοΈEnrollment in Schools:
β Gross Enrolment Ratio at all levels of school education has improved in 2019-20 compared to 2018-19.
β The GER is at 98% for students of Classes 1-8. For secondary and senior secondary students, GER stood at 78% and 51% respectively.
β Pupil-Teacher Ratio(PTR) has also improved at all levels of school education.
β The enrolment of girls increased at all levels of school education in 2019-20 compared to 2018-19. The increase was highest in the pre-primary level. Between 2012-13 and 2019-20, the Gender Parity Index (GPI) at both Secondary and Higher Secondary levels have also improved.
βͺοΈFacilities in Schools:
β More than 80% of schools in India in 2019-20 had functional electricity. This is an improvement of more than 6% over the previous year 2018-19.
β The number of schools having functional computers increased to 5.2 lakh in 2019-20 from 4.7 lakh in 2018-19.
β The number of schools having internet facilities increased to 3.36 lakh in 2019-20 from 2.9 lakh in 2018-19.
β More than 90% of schools in India had hand wash facilities in 2019-20. This is a major improvement as this percentage was only 36.3% in 2012-13.
β More than 83% of schools had electricity in 2019-20, an improvement of almost 7% over the previous year, 2018-19. In 2012-13, about 54.6% of schools had electricity.
β More than 82% of schools conducted medical check-ups of students in 2019-20, an increase of more than 4% compared to the previous year 2018-19.
#prelims
#education
Source PIB
Join @CSE_EXAM
β What is the News?
The Union Education Minister has released the report on United Information System for Education Plus(UDISE+) 2019-20 for School Education in India.
βͺοΈAbout UDISE:
β Unified District Information on School Education(UDISE) is one of the largest Management Information Systems on school education.
β UDISE was initiated in 2012-13 by the Ministry of Education by integrating DISE for elementary education and SEMIS for secondary education.
β Purpose: It helps measure the education parameters from classes 1 to 12 in government and private schools across India.
β UDISE+ is an updated and improved version of UDISE. It was developed in the year 2018-19 to speed up data entry, reduce errors, improve data quality and ease its verification.
β The present publication relates to the data for the reference year 2019-20.
Key Findings of the Report:
βͺοΈEnrollment in Schools:
β Gross Enrolment Ratio at all levels of school education has improved in 2019-20 compared to 2018-19.
β The GER is at 98% for students of Classes 1-8. For secondary and senior secondary students, GER stood at 78% and 51% respectively.
β Pupil-Teacher Ratio(PTR) has also improved at all levels of school education.
β The enrolment of girls increased at all levels of school education in 2019-20 compared to 2018-19. The increase was highest in the pre-primary level. Between 2012-13 and 2019-20, the Gender Parity Index (GPI) at both Secondary and Higher Secondary levels have also improved.
βͺοΈFacilities in Schools:
β More than 80% of schools in India in 2019-20 had functional electricity. This is an improvement of more than 6% over the previous year 2018-19.
β The number of schools having functional computers increased to 5.2 lakh in 2019-20 from 4.7 lakh in 2018-19.
β The number of schools having internet facilities increased to 3.36 lakh in 2019-20 from 2.9 lakh in 2018-19.
β More than 90% of schools in India had hand wash facilities in 2019-20. This is a major improvement as this percentage was only 36.3% in 2012-13.
β More than 83% of schools had electricity in 2019-20, an improvement of almost 7% over the previous year, 2018-19. In 2012-13, about 54.6% of schools had electricity.
β More than 82% of schools conducted medical check-ups of students in 2019-20, an increase of more than 4% compared to the previous year 2018-19.
#prelims
#education
Source PIB
Join @CSE_EXAM
πNational Education Policy
β National Education Policy, 2020 (NEP 2020) is the fi rst policy of the 21st century, and has come after 34 years, replacing the New Education Policy of 1986.
β It aims to transform India into a vibrant knowledge society and global knowledge superpower by making both school and college education more holistic and fl exible.
β The new system will have 12 years of schooling with three years of Anganwadi/ pre-schooling.
NCERT will develop a National Curricular and Pedagogical Framework for Early Childhood Care and Education (NCPFECCE) for children up to the age of 8 years.
β The policy has emphasised mother tongue/local language/ regional language as the medium of instruction at least till grade 5, but preferably till grade 8 and beyond, as far as possible.
β NEP aims to increase gross enrolment ratio in higher education (including vocational education) to 50 per cent by 2035.
β There will be a single overarching umbrella body - Higher Education Commission of India (HECI) - for entire higher education, excluding medical and legal education.
HECI will have four independent verticals:
πΈNational Higher Education Regulatory Council (NHERC) for regulation,
πΈGeneral Education Council (GEC ) for standard setting,
πΈ Higher Education Grants Council (HEGC) for funding, and
πΈNational Accreditation Council (NAC) for accreditation.
β An autonomous body, the National Educational Technology Forum (NETF), will be created to provide a platform for the free exchange of ideas on the use of technology to enhance learning, assessment, planning, administration.
#revision_notes
#gs2
#Education
#prelims
Join @CSE_EXAM
β National Education Policy, 2020 (NEP 2020) is the fi rst policy of the 21st century, and has come after 34 years, replacing the New Education Policy of 1986.
β It aims to transform India into a vibrant knowledge society and global knowledge superpower by making both school and college education more holistic and fl exible.
β The new system will have 12 years of schooling with three years of Anganwadi/ pre-schooling.
NCERT will develop a National Curricular and Pedagogical Framework for Early Childhood Care and Education (NCPFECCE) for children up to the age of 8 years.
β The policy has emphasised mother tongue/local language/ regional language as the medium of instruction at least till grade 5, but preferably till grade 8 and beyond, as far as possible.
β NEP aims to increase gross enrolment ratio in higher education (including vocational education) to 50 per cent by 2035.
β There will be a single overarching umbrella body - Higher Education Commission of India (HECI) - for entire higher education, excluding medical and legal education.
HECI will have four independent verticals:
πΈNational Higher Education Regulatory Council (NHERC) for regulation,
πΈGeneral Education Council (GEC ) for standard setting,
πΈ Higher Education Grants Council (HEGC) for funding, and
πΈNational Accreditation Council (NAC) for accreditation.
β An autonomous body, the National Educational Technology Forum (NETF), will be created to provide a platform for the free exchange of ideas on the use of technology to enhance learning, assessment, planning, administration.
#revision_notes
#gs2
#Education
#prelims
Join @CSE_EXAM
π2
πNational Digital University(NDU):
β The Central Government in its Budget 2022-23 announced the establishment of a digital university that provides access to students for world-class quality universal education with personalized learning experiences at their doorsteps.
βͺοΈStructure of NDU:
β The institution will function under a hub-and-spoke model, which is where one product is delivered to various stakeholders from a central location.
β The digital content for various courses will be hosted on the Study Webs of Active-Learning for Young Aspiring Minds (SWAYAM) platform.
β The IT and administrative services will be provided through the government's Samarth portal.
βͺοΈFacilities offered:
β The university will offer exclusively online courses from its partner institutes, which could be both private and public universities, so far as they follow the NDUβs model.
β The students can opt for certificate, diploma, or degree courses.
β NDU will allow students to pursue multiple courses at a time from the various partner institutes of NDU.
β Students will be able to register for programmes of individual universities through this Digital University.
β NDU aims to give students the liberty to design their own courses.
β How are academic credits granted?
β Students will have the option of earning credits from multiple institutions and will have multiple exit points throughout the course.
β Courses will hold a certain number of credits, and students will be eligible for a degree from a particular institute when they have accumulated 50% of the credits of a programme from the institute concerned.
β In case the student earns credits from multiple institutions and crosses the credit threshold, the degree awarded will be by NDU.
#education
#prelims
#mains
PIB
Join @PIB_UPSC
β The Central Government in its Budget 2022-23 announced the establishment of a digital university that provides access to students for world-class quality universal education with personalized learning experiences at their doorsteps.
βͺοΈStructure of NDU:
β The institution will function under a hub-and-spoke model, which is where one product is delivered to various stakeholders from a central location.
β The digital content for various courses will be hosted on the Study Webs of Active-Learning for Young Aspiring Minds (SWAYAM) platform.
β The IT and administrative services will be provided through the government's Samarth portal.
βͺοΈFacilities offered:
β The university will offer exclusively online courses from its partner institutes, which could be both private and public universities, so far as they follow the NDUβs model.
β The students can opt for certificate, diploma, or degree courses.
β NDU will allow students to pursue multiple courses at a time from the various partner institutes of NDU.
β Students will be able to register for programmes of individual universities through this Digital University.
β NDU aims to give students the liberty to design their own courses.
β How are academic credits granted?
β Students will have the option of earning credits from multiple institutions and will have multiple exit points throughout the course.
β Courses will hold a certain number of credits, and students will be eligible for a degree from a particular institute when they have accumulated 50% of the credits of a programme from the institute concerned.
β In case the student earns credits from multiple institutions and crosses the credit threshold, the degree awarded will be by NDU.
#education
#prelims
#mains
PIB
Join @PIB_UPSC
Government of India
Text of opening remarks of Union Minister of Education and Minister of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship during Education Ministersββ¦
Excellencies from Barbados, Republic of Costa Rica, Commonwealth of The Bahamas, Republic of Cuba, R
π7
π Why has West Bengal Developed its Own Education Policy Instead of Implementing NEP 2020?
βͺοΈAutonomy and Regional Needs:
β One of the primary reasons is the desire for autonomy in shaping the education system according to the unique needs and priorities of West Bengal.
β Education is a Concurrent Subject in India, which means both the central and state governments can legislate on it.
β States often seek to customize educational policies to align with their cultural, linguistic, and socio-economic contexts.
βͺοΈRural Disadvantage:
β The proposal for a common entrance test for undergraduate courses, as suggested by NEP 2020, raised worries in Bengal.
β The state government fears this could put rural students at a disadvantage and prefers a decentralized admission approach to ensure fairness for all.
βͺοΈHistorical and Cultural Factors:
β West Bengal has a rich cultural and linguistic diversity, with Bengali being the predominant language.
β The state has felt that it is important to preserve and promote the Bengali language and culture through its education policy.
β This could lead to variations from the NEP, which seeks to implement a uniform policy across the country.
β Another point of contention is the NEP's encouragement of private-sector participation in education.
β Bengal remains cautious about this, advocating for a stronger role of the public sector to ensure equal and accessible education opportunities.
βͺοΈConsideration of Alternatives:
β The West Bengal government has indicated its intention to analyze educational initiatives in states like Maharashtra and Kerala to propose an alternative approach.
β This signals a willingness to explore different models and adapt best practices from other states.
#education
#prelims
#gs2
#polity
Join @CSE_EXAM
@upsc_polity_Governance
βͺοΈAutonomy and Regional Needs:
β One of the primary reasons is the desire for autonomy in shaping the education system according to the unique needs and priorities of West Bengal.
β Education is a Concurrent Subject in India, which means both the central and state governments can legislate on it.
β States often seek to customize educational policies to align with their cultural, linguistic, and socio-economic contexts.
βͺοΈRural Disadvantage:
β The proposal for a common entrance test for undergraduate courses, as suggested by NEP 2020, raised worries in Bengal.
β The state government fears this could put rural students at a disadvantage and prefers a decentralized admission approach to ensure fairness for all.
βͺοΈHistorical and Cultural Factors:
β West Bengal has a rich cultural and linguistic diversity, with Bengali being the predominant language.
β The state has felt that it is important to preserve and promote the Bengali language and culture through its education policy.
β This could lead to variations from the NEP, which seeks to implement a uniform policy across the country.
β Another point of contention is the NEP's encouragement of private-sector participation in education.
β Bengal remains cautious about this, advocating for a stronger role of the public sector to ensure equal and accessible education opportunities.
βͺοΈConsideration of Alternatives:
β The West Bengal government has indicated its intention to analyze educational initiatives in states like Maharashtra and Kerala to propose an alternative approach.
β This signals a willingness to explore different models and adapt best practices from other states.
#education
#prelims
#gs2
#polity
Join @CSE_EXAM
@upsc_polity_Governance
π11β€1
πHistorical Evolution of Education Status in India
β Provincial List (1935) : Education placed under the provincial list, giving provinces control over educational matters.
β State List (Post- Independence) ; Education listed under the State List, making it the responsibility of state legislatures.
β Swaran Singh Committee (1976) : Recommended moving education to the Concurrent List for nationwide policy development.
β 42nd Amendment (1976) : Shifted education from the State List to the Concurrent List, allowing both Centre and States to legislate.
β Attempt to 2 Revert (1978) : Janata Party's effort to return education to the State List failed in the Rajya Sabha.
β Current Status : Education is under Entry 25 of the Concurrent List, enabling both Union and State governments to enact laws.
#mains
#education
Join @CSE_EXAM
β Provincial List (1935) : Education placed under the provincial list, giving provinces control over educational matters.
β State List (Post- Independence) ; Education listed under the State List, making it the responsibility of state legislatures.
β Swaran Singh Committee (1976) : Recommended moving education to the Concurrent List for nationwide policy development.
β 42nd Amendment (1976) : Shifted education from the State List to the Concurrent List, allowing both Centre and States to legislate.
β Attempt to 2 Revert (1978) : Janata Party's effort to return education to the State List failed in the Rajya Sabha.
β Current Status : Education is under Entry 25 of the Concurrent List, enabling both Union and State governments to enact laws.
#mains
#education
Join @CSE_EXAM
π13β€1
πKey Facts on Education, Skill Development, and Research in India:
β Literacy Rate: India's literacy rate stands at 77.7% (2024). Kerala leads with 96.2%, while Bihar reports 69.8%. Gender gap persists with male literacy at 84.7% and female literacy at 70.3%.
π Adult Illiteracy:
β Approximately 20.7 crore adults (23% of the adult population) are non-literate, the largest in the world.
β Women constitute a significant majority of the adult illiterate population, reflecting persistent gender disparities.
πGross Enrollment Ratio (GER):
β Primary: 103.4% (Girls > Boys)
β Upper Primary: 94.7% (Girls > Boys)
β Secondary: 79.6% (Girls > Boys)
β Higher Education: 28.4% (Girls > Boys)
π Dropout Rates: Definition (Ministry of Education): A dropout is defined as a student who has enrolled in school but has been absent for 45 days or more continuously without providing prior intimation or officially leaving the institution.
β Primary Level: 1.5%
β Upper Primary Level: 3.0%
β Secondary Level: 12.6%
β Note: High attrition rates at the secondary level highlight retention challenges.
πPupil-Teacher Ratio (PTR):
β Primary (Grades I-V): 26:1 (Better than RTE-prescribed 30:1)
β Upper Primary (Grades VI-VIII): 19:1 (Much better than RTE-prescribed 35:1)
β Secondary (Grades IX-X): 17:1 (No specific RTE prescription)
π Vocational Education:
β Total Trained Under Skill India Mission: 68 lakh individuals since inception.
β Placement Rate: Approximately 23%, with sectors like electronics achieving 54%, and apparel about 20%.
πExpenditure on Education:
β Union Budget 2024-25: βΉ1,20,628 crore allocated to education, constituting 2.5% of total budgeted expenditure.
β Department of School Education & Literacy: βΉ73,008 crore allocated.
β Department of Higher Education: βΉ47,620 crore allocated.
β Percentage of GDP: Education spending remains at approximately 4.1-4.6% of GDP, below the 6% target set by the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.
πResearch & Development (R&D):
β Gross Expenditure on R&D (GERD): βΉ1,27,381 crore (FY2021).
β Percentage of GDP: 0.64%, significantly lower than South Korea (4.8%) and the USA (3.5%).
β Private Sector Contribution: Only 0.2% of GDP, highlighting the need for increased corporate R&D investment.
πMajor Investments in 2024:
β NXP Semiconductors: $1 billion investment in R&D in India.
β Delta Electronics: $500 million investment in India's largest R&D center in Bengaluru.
#education #GS2 #social_issues
Join @CSE_EXAM
β Literacy Rate: India's literacy rate stands at 77.7% (2024). Kerala leads with 96.2%, while Bihar reports 69.8%. Gender gap persists with male literacy at 84.7% and female literacy at 70.3%.
π Adult Illiteracy:
β Approximately 20.7 crore adults (23% of the adult population) are non-literate, the largest in the world.
β Women constitute a significant majority of the adult illiterate population, reflecting persistent gender disparities.
πGross Enrollment Ratio (GER):
β Primary: 103.4% (Girls > Boys)
β Upper Primary: 94.7% (Girls > Boys)
β Secondary: 79.6% (Girls > Boys)
β Higher Education: 28.4% (Girls > Boys)
π Dropout Rates: Definition (Ministry of Education): A dropout is defined as a student who has enrolled in school but has been absent for 45 days or more continuously without providing prior intimation or officially leaving the institution.
β Primary Level: 1.5%
β Upper Primary Level: 3.0%
β Secondary Level: 12.6%
β Note: High attrition rates at the secondary level highlight retention challenges.
πPupil-Teacher Ratio (PTR):
β Primary (Grades I-V): 26:1 (Better than RTE-prescribed 30:1)
β Upper Primary (Grades VI-VIII): 19:1 (Much better than RTE-prescribed 35:1)
β Secondary (Grades IX-X): 17:1 (No specific RTE prescription)
π Vocational Education:
β Total Trained Under Skill India Mission: 68 lakh individuals since inception.
β Placement Rate: Approximately 23%, with sectors like electronics achieving 54%, and apparel about 20%.
πExpenditure on Education:
β Union Budget 2024-25: βΉ1,20,628 crore allocated to education, constituting 2.5% of total budgeted expenditure.
β Department of School Education & Literacy: βΉ73,008 crore allocated.
β Department of Higher Education: βΉ47,620 crore allocated.
β Percentage of GDP: Education spending remains at approximately 4.1-4.6% of GDP, below the 6% target set by the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.
πResearch & Development (R&D):
β Gross Expenditure on R&D (GERD): βΉ1,27,381 crore (FY2021).
β Percentage of GDP: 0.64%, significantly lower than South Korea (4.8%) and the USA (3.5%).
β Private Sector Contribution: Only 0.2% of GDP, highlighting the need for increased corporate R&D investment.
πMajor Investments in 2024:
β NXP Semiconductors: $1 billion investment in R&D in India.
β Delta Electronics: $500 million investment in India's largest R&D center in Bengaluru.
#education #GS2 #social_issues
Join @CSE_EXAM
π19β€6π₯2π1
π PRERANA: AN EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING PROGRAM
β Launched by: Department of School Education & Literacy, Ministry of Education, Government of India
β Aim: To provide a distinctive, motivational, and experiential learning experience to students, focusing on leadership qualities.
β Headquarters: Vernacular school in Vadnagar, Gujarat.
β Program Duration: Weekly residential program.
β Curriculum Developed by: IIT Gandhinagar.
β Target Group: 20 students from different parts of the country on a rotational basis.
π OBJECTIVES
β To integrate the principles of the Indian education system and the philosophy of value-based education, in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.
β The core focus is to nurture leadership qualities and promote unity in diversity.
π NINE CORE VALUES-BASED THEMES
β The program is based on 9 core values-based themes:
β’ Self-respect and humility
β’ Courage and determination
β’ Hard work and dedication
β’ Compassion and service
β’ Diversity and unity
β’ Truthfulness and cleanliness
β’ Innovation and curiosity
β’ Faith and trust
β’ Independence and responsibility
π ACTIVITIES UNDER PRERANA
β The program features activities like yoga, meditation, and cultural experiences, coupled with experiential learning, thematic discussions, and hands-on educational activities.
β Sessions will include visits to historical and heritage sites, inspirational film screenings, and career-oriented discussions.
β Mentors from prestigious institutions will guide participants in this transformative experience.
π SELECTION PROCESS
β Eligibility: Students in Classes 9 to 12
β How to Apply: Interested students can register through the portal: [prerana.education.gov.in](http://prerana.education.gov.in).
β Total Participants: 20 students (10 male, 10 female) from various regions.
#Prerana #Leadership #ExperientialLearning #Education #NEP2020 #ValueBasedEducation
β Launched by: Department of School Education & Literacy, Ministry of Education, Government of India
β Aim: To provide a distinctive, motivational, and experiential learning experience to students, focusing on leadership qualities.
β Headquarters: Vernacular school in Vadnagar, Gujarat.
β Program Duration: Weekly residential program.
β Curriculum Developed by: IIT Gandhinagar.
β Target Group: 20 students from different parts of the country on a rotational basis.
π OBJECTIVES
β To integrate the principles of the Indian education system and the philosophy of value-based education, in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020.
β The core focus is to nurture leadership qualities and promote unity in diversity.
π NINE CORE VALUES-BASED THEMES
β The program is based on 9 core values-based themes:
β’ Self-respect and humility
β’ Courage and determination
β’ Hard work and dedication
β’ Compassion and service
β’ Diversity and unity
β’ Truthfulness and cleanliness
β’ Innovation and curiosity
β’ Faith and trust
β’ Independence and responsibility
π ACTIVITIES UNDER PRERANA
β The program features activities like yoga, meditation, and cultural experiences, coupled with experiential learning, thematic discussions, and hands-on educational activities.
β Sessions will include visits to historical and heritage sites, inspirational film screenings, and career-oriented discussions.
β Mentors from prestigious institutions will guide participants in this transformative experience.
π SELECTION PROCESS
β Eligibility: Students in Classes 9 to 12
β How to Apply: Interested students can register through the portal: [prerana.education.gov.in](http://prerana.education.gov.in).
β Total Participants: 20 students (10 male, 10 female) from various regions.
#Prerana #Leadership #ExperientialLearning #Education #NEP2020 #ValueBasedEducation
π3β€βπ₯1
π Three-Language Formula: A Double-Edged Sword?
π Arguments For
β Expands educational access for diverse linguistic backgrounds
β Boosts parental involvement by using native languages
β Improves socio-emotional growth and cognitive abilities
β Enhances academic performance across subjects
β Preserves cultural identity and linguistic traditions
β Offers economic, social, and environmental benefits (e.g., multilingual Switzerland)
π Arguments Against
β Risks politicizing language issuesβmay hinder national integration
β Overburdens primary education, especially for monolingual children
β Shortage of qualified teachers for additional languages
β Implementation hurdles in linguistically diverse states
β Administrative execution challenges (e.g., Haryanaβs Tamil case)
β Tech tools (e.g., AI) may reduce the need for traditional language learning
#GS2 #EducationPolicy #education #IndiaLanguages #GS1
π Arguments For
β Expands educational access for diverse linguistic backgrounds
β Boosts parental involvement by using native languages
β Improves socio-emotional growth and cognitive abilities
β Enhances academic performance across subjects
β Preserves cultural identity and linguistic traditions
β Offers economic, social, and environmental benefits (e.g., multilingual Switzerland)
π Arguments Against
β Risks politicizing language issuesβmay hinder national integration
β Overburdens primary education, especially for monolingual children
β Shortage of qualified teachers for additional languages
β Implementation hurdles in linguistically diverse states
β Administrative execution challenges (e.g., Haryanaβs Tamil case)
β Tech tools (e.g., AI) may reduce the need for traditional language learning
π Mains Question (GS2)ο»Ώ
Critically examine the feasibility and implications of implementing the three-language formula in a multilingual country like India.
#GS2 #EducationPolicy #education #IndiaLanguages #GS1
β€6π1
doc2025728593201.pdf
1.5 MB
π NEP 2020: A 5-Year Transformation in Indian Schooling
π Structural Reforms & Learning Shift
β Introduced 5+3+3+4 system, replacing 10+2
β NCF-SE 2023 promotes competency-based learning
β Board exams: 50% questions now competency-based
β Multilingual textbooks like Mridang, Sarangi, Joyful Mathematics
π Foundational Learning & ECCE
β 85% brain development occurs before age 6 β focus on ECCE + FLN
β Launched NIPUN Bharat, Vidya Pravesh, Balvatikas
β 12.97 lakh teachers trained under NISHTHA for FLN
β Jadui Pitara & e-Jadui Pitara bring play-based multilingual learning
β PARAKH & ASER 2024: Govt school kids outperform private peers in Grade 3 reading & math
π Equity & Inclusion
β Samagra Shiksha enhanced dropout reduction & school access
β 1.15 lakh SEDG students in inclusive hostels; 7.58 lakh girls in KGBVs
β NIOS & PM JANMAN provide flexible education & hostel infra for tribal learners
β PRASHAST App enables early disability screening; ISL introduced in schools
π Technology for Learning
β DIKSHA: QR-coded multilingual content, teacher training modules
β PM eVidya: 200 DTH channels ensure education access
β Rashtriya Vidya Samiksha Kendra: Data-driven decision-making
π Assessment Reform
β Shift from rote to formative & holistic evaluation
β Holistic Progress Cards (HPCs) now track academic + emotional growth
β PARAKH & SQAAF ensure quality & equity in school standards
π Vocational & Skill Education
β Vocational education starts from Grade 6
β National Credit Framework (NCrF) aligns school and skill education
π Recognition
β UNESCOβs King Sejong Literacy Prize (2021) for inclusive efforts
π Conclusion
NEP 2020 is creating classrooms that are flexible, multilingual, inclusive, and joyful. It aims to nurture confidence, curiosity, and capability, not just test scores.
#education #social_issue #GS2
π Structural Reforms & Learning Shift
β Introduced 5+3+3+4 system, replacing 10+2
β NCF-SE 2023 promotes competency-based learning
β Board exams: 50% questions now competency-based
β Multilingual textbooks like Mridang, Sarangi, Joyful Mathematics
π Foundational Learning & ECCE
β 85% brain development occurs before age 6 β focus on ECCE + FLN
β Launched NIPUN Bharat, Vidya Pravesh, Balvatikas
β 12.97 lakh teachers trained under NISHTHA for FLN
β Jadui Pitara & e-Jadui Pitara bring play-based multilingual learning
β PARAKH & ASER 2024: Govt school kids outperform private peers in Grade 3 reading & math
π Equity & Inclusion
β Samagra Shiksha enhanced dropout reduction & school access
β 1.15 lakh SEDG students in inclusive hostels; 7.58 lakh girls in KGBVs
β NIOS & PM JANMAN provide flexible education & hostel infra for tribal learners
β PRASHAST App enables early disability screening; ISL introduced in schools
π Technology for Learning
β DIKSHA: QR-coded multilingual content, teacher training modules
β PM eVidya: 200 DTH channels ensure education access
β Rashtriya Vidya Samiksha Kendra: Data-driven decision-making
π Assessment Reform
β Shift from rote to formative & holistic evaluation
β Holistic Progress Cards (HPCs) now track academic + emotional growth
β PARAKH & SQAAF ensure quality & equity in school standards
π Vocational & Skill Education
β Vocational education starts from Grade 6
β National Credit Framework (NCrF) aligns school and skill education
π Recognition
β UNESCOβs King Sejong Literacy Prize (2021) for inclusive efforts
π Conclusion
NEP 2020 is creating classrooms that are flexible, multilingual, inclusive, and joyful. It aims to nurture confidence, curiosity, and capability, not just test scores.
π UPSC Mains Questions (GS2)
The NEP 2020 seeks to reimagine education by making it inclusive, engaging, and future-ready.β Discuss the key reforms introduced in school education and their impact in the last five years. (250 words)
#education #social_issue #GS2
β€7
π Pythagoras Theorem Controversy: India vs Greece Origins?
π Whatβs in the News?
β A Karnataka Govt position paper under NEP 2020 described Pythagorasβs theorem as βfake newsβ, claiming Baudhayana Sulbasutra already stated it.
π Who was Pythagoras?
β A Greek philosopher (c. 570β490 BCE)
β Known more through his followers; no direct writings survive
β Founded a secretive school in Italy
β Contributions are hard to attribute directly to him
π What is the Pythagoras Theorem?
β Applies to right-angled triangles
β Formula: aΒ² + bΒ² = cΒ² (where βcβ is hypotenuse)
β If any 2 sides are known, the third can be calculated
π Indiaβs Ancient Knowledge β Baudhayana Sulbasutra
β Dated to around 800 BCE (older than Pythagoras)
β Vedic text on altar construction for yajnas
β States the Pythagorean relation as a geometric truth (not a theorem)
β Used in designing vedis (altars) in isosceles triangles, trapezia, rectangles
β Considered one of the earliest geometric texts in India
π Global Evolution of the Theorem
β Babylonian civilisation (1900β1600 BCE) referred to it as Diagonal Rule
β Euclidβs Elements (~300 BCE) has the first axiomatic proof
π Conclusion
β While Pythagoras popularized it in Greece, evidence suggests Indians, Babylonians, and others knew it much earlier
β The term βfake newsβ is controversial β but ancient Indian texts like Sulbasutras did state the concept well before Greek formalization
#Culture #Education #ScienceHeritage #UPSCMains #GS1 #AncientIndia
π Whatβs in the News?
β A Karnataka Govt position paper under NEP 2020 described Pythagorasβs theorem as βfake newsβ, claiming Baudhayana Sulbasutra already stated it.
π Who was Pythagoras?
β A Greek philosopher (c. 570β490 BCE)
β Known more through his followers; no direct writings survive
β Founded a secretive school in Italy
β Contributions are hard to attribute directly to him
π What is the Pythagoras Theorem?
β Applies to right-angled triangles
β Formula: aΒ² + bΒ² = cΒ² (where βcβ is hypotenuse)
β If any 2 sides are known, the third can be calculated
π Indiaβs Ancient Knowledge β Baudhayana Sulbasutra
β Dated to around 800 BCE (older than Pythagoras)
β Vedic text on altar construction for yajnas
β States the Pythagorean relation as a geometric truth (not a theorem)
β Used in designing vedis (altars) in isosceles triangles, trapezia, rectangles
β Considered one of the earliest geometric texts in India
π Global Evolution of the Theorem
β Babylonian civilisation (1900β1600 BCE) referred to it as Diagonal Rule
β Euclidβs Elements (~300 BCE) has the first axiomatic proof
π Conclusion
β While Pythagoras popularized it in Greece, evidence suggests Indians, Babylonians, and others knew it much earlier
β The term βfake newsβ is controversial β but ancient Indian texts like Sulbasutras did state the concept well before Greek formalization
#Culture #Education #ScienceHeritage #UPSCMains #GS1 #AncientIndia
β€10
π Crisis in Indiaβs Examination System
π Why in Focus?
β Recent controversies involving NEET, CBSE Class 12 evaluation, and CUET-UG have exposed deep structural flaws in Indiaβs examination system, raising concerns over governance, transparency, accountability, and institutional credibility.
π Current Crisis
β NEET: Paper leaks and integrity issues undermined trust in the National Testing Agency (NTA).
β CBSE: Faulty On-Screen Marking (OSM) system led to blurred scans, missing answer scripts and evaluation errors affecting 18 lakh students.
β CUET-UG: Technical glitches disrupted examinations at multiple centres across the country.
π Key Governance Challenges
β Operational & Technological Issues
β’ Excessive outsourcing to private vendors without adequate due diligence.
β’ Lack of pilot testing and stress-testing before nationwide implementation.
β’ Poor digital capacity building and inadequate teacher training.
β Administrative Failures
β’ Top-down decision-making ignored ground-level feedback.
β’ Defensive institutional culture discouraged transparency.
β’ Hyper-centralised examinations created a single point of failure, affecting millions simultaneously.
β Socio-Economic Implications
β’ Over 4 lakh re-evaluation requests indicate declining public trust.
β’ Financially weaker students face barriers in seeking re-evaluation and legal remedies.
β’ Digital divide and economic inequality are further aggravated.
β Ethical & Accountability Concerns
β’ Absence of institutional accountability despite systemic failures.
β’ Pressure on officials to defend institutions undermines civil service ethics, neutrality and transparency.
β’ Weak grievance redressal mechanisms erode public confidence.
π Way Forward
β Strengthen Technological Infrastructure
β’ Use NIC-hosted sovereign cloud infrastructure with end-to-end encryption.
β’ Mandatory third-party audits by institutions like IITs before deployment.
β Administrative Reforms
β’ Introduce multi-stage, flexible examinations throughout the year.
β’ Separate responsibilities among independent agencies for:
β’ Question paper preparation
β’ Exam conduct
β’ Independent auditing
β Legal & Institutional Measures
β’ Strict implementation of the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act.
β’ Strong whistleblower protection and time-bound grievance redressal.
β’ Penal action and blacklisting of defaulting vendors and officials.
π Value Addition
β Good Governance Principles
β’ Transparency
β’ Accountability
β’ Responsiveness
β’ Efficiency
β’ Rule of Law
β’ Citizen-centric administration
β Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024
Provides stringent penalties against paper leaks, organised cheating and malpractice in public examinations.
π UPSC Mains Practice Question
βRepeated examination-related controversies highlight deeper governance deficits rather than isolated technological failures. Critically examine the structural challenges in Indiaβs examination system and suggest institutional reforms to ensure transparency, accountability and public trust.β (GS-II | 15 Marks | 250 Words)
#GS2 #Governance #Education #mains
π Why in Focus?
β Recent controversies involving NEET, CBSE Class 12 evaluation, and CUET-UG have exposed deep structural flaws in Indiaβs examination system, raising concerns over governance, transparency, accountability, and institutional credibility.
π Current Crisis
β NEET: Paper leaks and integrity issues undermined trust in the National Testing Agency (NTA).
β CBSE: Faulty On-Screen Marking (OSM) system led to blurred scans, missing answer scripts and evaluation errors affecting 18 lakh students.
β CUET-UG: Technical glitches disrupted examinations at multiple centres across the country.
π Key Governance Challenges
β Operational & Technological Issues
β’ Excessive outsourcing to private vendors without adequate due diligence.
β’ Lack of pilot testing and stress-testing before nationwide implementation.
β’ Poor digital capacity building and inadequate teacher training.
β Administrative Failures
β’ Top-down decision-making ignored ground-level feedback.
β’ Defensive institutional culture discouraged transparency.
β’ Hyper-centralised examinations created a single point of failure, affecting millions simultaneously.
β Socio-Economic Implications
β’ Over 4 lakh re-evaluation requests indicate declining public trust.
β’ Financially weaker students face barriers in seeking re-evaluation and legal remedies.
β’ Digital divide and economic inequality are further aggravated.
β Ethical & Accountability Concerns
β’ Absence of institutional accountability despite systemic failures.
β’ Pressure on officials to defend institutions undermines civil service ethics, neutrality and transparency.
β’ Weak grievance redressal mechanisms erode public confidence.
π Way Forward
β Strengthen Technological Infrastructure
β’ Use NIC-hosted sovereign cloud infrastructure with end-to-end encryption.
β’ Mandatory third-party audits by institutions like IITs before deployment.
β Administrative Reforms
β’ Introduce multi-stage, flexible examinations throughout the year.
β’ Separate responsibilities among independent agencies for:
β’ Question paper preparation
β’ Exam conduct
β’ Independent auditing
β Legal & Institutional Measures
β’ Strict implementation of the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act.
β’ Strong whistleblower protection and time-bound grievance redressal.
β’ Penal action and blacklisting of defaulting vendors and officials.
π Value Addition
β Good Governance Principles
β’ Transparency
β’ Accountability
β’ Responsiveness
β’ Efficiency
β’ Rule of Law
β’ Citizen-centric administration
β Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024
Provides stringent penalties against paper leaks, organised cheating and malpractice in public examinations.
π UPSC Mains Practice Question
βRepeated examination-related controversies highlight deeper governance deficits rather than isolated technological failures. Critically examine the structural challenges in Indiaβs examination system and suggest institutional reforms to ensure transparency, accountability and public trust.β (GS-II | 15 Marks | 250 Words)
#GS2 #Governance #Education #mains
β€3
π Supreme Court-Appointed National Task Force (NTF) on Student Mental Health & Suicides
π Why in Focus?
β The Supreme Court-appointed National Task Force (NTF) submitted its interim report, emphasizing that student suicides are a structural and institutional issue, not merely an individual mental health problem.
π Key Highlights:
β Constituted by the Supreme Court in Amit Kumar & Ors v. Union of India (2026) under the chairmanship of Justice S. Ravindra Bhat (Retd.).
β The report identifies institutional, academic, social and economic pressures as major drivers of student suicides, calling for systemic reforms.
β India lacks a dedicated statutory framework for suicide prevention in higher educational institutions and relies mainly on non-binding guidelines.
β Over 70% of institutions lack full-time mental health professionals, while less than 4% have suicide-risk management protocols.
β SC, ST and OBC students face disproportionately higher dropout rates due to discrimination, financial hardship and inadequate institutional support.
π Key Recommendations:
β Fill all faculty vacancies, including reserved-category posts, within 3 months and key administrative posts within 1 month.
β Make mandatory reporting of every student suicide to regulators and State nodal authorities, irrespective of the place of death.
β Ensure 24Γ7 access to qualified medical and mental health professionals in all residential educational institutions.
β Direct the NCRB to maintain separate data on school and higher education student suicides for evidence-based policymaking.
π Significance:
β Promotes a shift from an individual-centric to an institution-centric approach towards student well-being.
β Strengthens inclusive education, social justice, accountability and mental health governance in educational institutions.
β Aligns with the constitutional values of equality, dignity and the right to life under Article 21.
β Mains Question (GS-II | 150 Words):
βStudent suicides reflect deeper institutional and social failures rather than merely individual mental health challenges.β Examine the findings of the Supreme Court-appointed National Task Force and suggest measures to build a supportive higher education ecosystem in India.
#GS2 #Education #mains
π Why in Focus?
β The Supreme Court-appointed National Task Force (NTF) submitted its interim report, emphasizing that student suicides are a structural and institutional issue, not merely an individual mental health problem.
π Key Highlights:
β Constituted by the Supreme Court in Amit Kumar & Ors v. Union of India (2026) under the chairmanship of Justice S. Ravindra Bhat (Retd.).
β The report identifies institutional, academic, social and economic pressures as major drivers of student suicides, calling for systemic reforms.
β India lacks a dedicated statutory framework for suicide prevention in higher educational institutions and relies mainly on non-binding guidelines.
β Over 70% of institutions lack full-time mental health professionals, while less than 4% have suicide-risk management protocols.
β SC, ST and OBC students face disproportionately higher dropout rates due to discrimination, financial hardship and inadequate institutional support.
π Key Recommendations:
β Fill all faculty vacancies, including reserved-category posts, within 3 months and key administrative posts within 1 month.
β Make mandatory reporting of every student suicide to regulators and State nodal authorities, irrespective of the place of death.
β Ensure 24Γ7 access to qualified medical and mental health professionals in all residential educational institutions.
β Direct the NCRB to maintain separate data on school and higher education student suicides for evidence-based policymaking.
π Significance:
β Promotes a shift from an individual-centric to an institution-centric approach towards student well-being.
β Strengthens inclusive education, social justice, accountability and mental health governance in educational institutions.
β Aligns with the constitutional values of equality, dignity and the right to life under Article 21.
β Mains Question (GS-II | 150 Words):
βStudent suicides reflect deeper institutional and social failures rather than merely individual mental health challenges.β Examine the findings of the Supreme Court-appointed National Task Force and suggest measures to build a supportive higher education ecosystem in India.
#GS2 #Education #mains
β€12π1
π Public Examination Reform 2.0 (PER 2.0)
π Why in News?
π’ An education reform expert has called for Public Examination Reform 2.0 (PER 2.0) to shift India from reactive post-breach responses to systemic examination security.
π What is PER 2.0?
π’ A lifecycle-oriented integrity architecture for high-stakes entrance and recruitment examinations.
π’ Moves beyond PER 1.0 (2006β2015), which focused mainly on candidate-facing transparency.
π’ Emphasises auditable SOPs, end-to-end chain of custody and institutional accountability.
π Why Needed?
π’ Question-paper compromises can occur at the question-setting and moderation stage, not merely during physical transport.
π’ Physical security is ineffective when digital workflows and database access remain vulnerable.
π’ Repeated content errors and translation glitches undermine examination credibility.
π’ Earlier committees produced recommendations but often lacked enforceable Action Taken Reports.
π’ Irregularities, score inflation and abnormal clustering of high scores threaten the sanctity of merit.
π Core Pillars
π’ Secure Question Setting: Background checks, conflict-of-interest declarations, rotation and secure translation.
π’ Digital Custody: Role-based access, biometrics, digital watermarking and activity logs.
π’ Risk-Based Centres: Algorithmic centre allocation, infrastructure audits and CCTV-based proctoring.
π’ Independent Audits: Statistical anomaly detection, cybersecurity audits, whistleblower mechanisms and public integrity reports.
π Major Challenges
π’ Massive scale and linguistic diversity.
π’ Dependence on private testing infrastructure and vendors.
π’ Commercial coaching networks and possible intermediary nexuses.
π’ Cyberattacks and AI-generated forgeries.
π’ Coordination difficulties between central and State examination bodies.
π Way Forward
π’ Publish a National White Paper on Exam Integrity.
π’ Establish a Unified Public Examination Integrity Framework for NTA, UPSC, State PSCs and recruitment boards.
π’ Adopt secure-by-design examination architecture.
π’ Implement relevant Nilekani & Radhakrishnan Committee recommendations with time-bound accountability.
π’ Strengthen fast-track legal mechanisms and whistleblower protection.
π― Mains Question
βThe repeated collapse of examination systems reflects deeper structural weaknesses in public administration.β Examine the institutional factors contributing to recurring examination controversies in India. Outline the reforms required in exam governance mechanisms.
#Education
π Why in News?
π’ An education reform expert has called for Public Examination Reform 2.0 (PER 2.0) to shift India from reactive post-breach responses to systemic examination security.
π What is PER 2.0?
π’ A lifecycle-oriented integrity architecture for high-stakes entrance and recruitment examinations.
π’ Moves beyond PER 1.0 (2006β2015), which focused mainly on candidate-facing transparency.
π’ Emphasises auditable SOPs, end-to-end chain of custody and institutional accountability.
π Why Needed?
π’ Question-paper compromises can occur at the question-setting and moderation stage, not merely during physical transport.
π’ Physical security is ineffective when digital workflows and database access remain vulnerable.
π’ Repeated content errors and translation glitches undermine examination credibility.
π’ Earlier committees produced recommendations but often lacked enforceable Action Taken Reports.
π’ Irregularities, score inflation and abnormal clustering of high scores threaten the sanctity of merit.
π Core Pillars
π’ Secure Question Setting: Background checks, conflict-of-interest declarations, rotation and secure translation.
π’ Digital Custody: Role-based access, biometrics, digital watermarking and activity logs.
π’ Risk-Based Centres: Algorithmic centre allocation, infrastructure audits and CCTV-based proctoring.
π’ Independent Audits: Statistical anomaly detection, cybersecurity audits, whistleblower mechanisms and public integrity reports.
π Major Challenges
π’ Massive scale and linguistic diversity.
π’ Dependence on private testing infrastructure and vendors.
π’ Commercial coaching networks and possible intermediary nexuses.
π’ Cyberattacks and AI-generated forgeries.
π’ Coordination difficulties between central and State examination bodies.
π Way Forward
π’ Publish a National White Paper on Exam Integrity.
π’ Establish a Unified Public Examination Integrity Framework for NTA, UPSC, State PSCs and recruitment boards.
π’ Adopt secure-by-design examination architecture.
π’ Implement relevant Nilekani & Radhakrishnan Committee recommendations with time-bound accountability.
π’ Strengthen fast-track legal mechanisms and whistleblower protection.
π― Mains Question
βThe repeated collapse of examination systems reflects deeper structural weaknesses in public administration.β Examine the institutional factors contributing to recurring examination controversies in India. Outline the reforms required in exam governance mechanisms.
#Education
β€1
π International Literacy Day 2026: ULLAS Mela
π Why in News?
The two-day International Literacy Day 2026 observance concluded in New Delhi with the ULLAS Mela, inaugurated by DoSEL Secretary Shri T. K. Anil Kumar.
π ULLAS Mela
π’ The Mela showcased literacy best practices through exhibition stalls.
π’ 28 States/UTs participated.
π’ Key institutional participants included NCERT, NCTE and NIOS.
π’ It serves as the annual public showcase of the ULLAS initiative.
π ULLAS
π’ Full Form: Understanding of Lifelong Learning for All in Society.
π’ It is the Centreβs ongoing movement for adult literacy and functional literacy.
π’ It extends the literacy agenda beyond basic reading and writing towards practical capabilities needed in everyday life.
π Emerging Dimensions of Literacy
π’ Financial literacy β understanding financial services and decisions.
π’ Legal literacy β awareness of rights and legal provisions.
π’ Digital literacy β ability to engage effectively with digital technologies.
π’ Electoral literacy β awareness and informed participation in the electoral process.
π Key Institutional Stakeholders
π’ DoSEL: Department of School Education & Literacy.
π’ NCERT: National Council of Educational Research and Training.
π’ NCTE: National Council for Teacher Education.
π’ NIOS: National Institute of Open Schooling.
π’ States/UTs: Key partners in implementing and showcasing adult-literacy initiatives.
π Key Takeaway
ULLAS reflects the changing meaning of literacyβfrom traditional literacy towards lifelong, functional, financial, legal, digital and electoral literacy, supporting more informed and empowered citizens.
π Prelims Quick Fact
ULLAS β Understanding of Lifelong Learning for All in Society
ULLAS Mela β 28 States/UTs + NCERT + NCTE + NIOS
#Education
π Why in News?
The two-day International Literacy Day 2026 observance concluded in New Delhi with the ULLAS Mela, inaugurated by DoSEL Secretary Shri T. K. Anil Kumar.
π ULLAS Mela
π’ The Mela showcased literacy best practices through exhibition stalls.
π’ 28 States/UTs participated.
π’ Key institutional participants included NCERT, NCTE and NIOS.
π’ It serves as the annual public showcase of the ULLAS initiative.
π ULLAS
π’ Full Form: Understanding of Lifelong Learning for All in Society.
π’ It is the Centreβs ongoing movement for adult literacy and functional literacy.
π’ It extends the literacy agenda beyond basic reading and writing towards practical capabilities needed in everyday life.
π Emerging Dimensions of Literacy
π’ Financial literacy β understanding financial services and decisions.
π’ Legal literacy β awareness of rights and legal provisions.
π’ Digital literacy β ability to engage effectively with digital technologies.
π’ Electoral literacy β awareness and informed participation in the electoral process.
π Key Institutional Stakeholders
π’ DoSEL: Department of School Education & Literacy.
π’ NCERT: National Council of Educational Research and Training.
π’ NCTE: National Council for Teacher Education.
π’ NIOS: National Institute of Open Schooling.
π’ States/UTs: Key partners in implementing and showcasing adult-literacy initiatives.
π Key Takeaway
ULLAS reflects the changing meaning of literacyβfrom traditional literacy towards lifelong, functional, financial, legal, digital and electoral literacy, supporting more informed and empowered citizens.
π Prelims Quick Fact
ULLAS β Understanding of Lifelong Learning for All in Society
ULLAS Mela β 28 States/UTs + NCERT + NCTE + NIOS
#Education
β€3