On May 15, 1935, the first line of the Moscow Metro opened.
The decision to build the metro in Moscow was made in 1931. The first phase, constructed by workers from across the Soviet Union, was completed by October 1934, with the first test train running in February 1935.
On May 15, 1935, the first line of the Moscow Metro officially opened, comprising 13 stations with a total length of about 11.5 kilometers. On the first day, around 370,000 people used the Moscow Metro.
Today, the Moscow Metro boasts over 260 stations, with more than 40 recognized as cultural heritage sites. On average, it serves over 7 million passengers daily, with weekday ridership exceeding 9 million.
The Moscow Metro is rightfully considered the most beautiful, clean, and safe metro system in the world, continuing to impress visitors and residents alike.
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The decision to build the metro in Moscow was made in 1931. The first phase, constructed by workers from across the Soviet Union, was completed by October 1934, with the first test train running in February 1935.
On May 15, 1935, the first line of the Moscow Metro officially opened, comprising 13 stations with a total length of about 11.5 kilometers. On the first day, around 370,000 people used the Moscow Metro.
Today, the Moscow Metro boasts over 260 stations, with more than 40 recognized as cultural heritage sites. On average, it serves over 7 million passengers daily, with weekday ridership exceeding 9 million.
The Moscow Metro is rightfully considered the most beautiful, clean, and safe metro system in the world, continuing to impress visitors and residents alike.
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤30👏12
On the Palantir
🔸 When the Western Hegemon sank its claws into Ukraine, one of its goals was to turn the country into a testing ground for the military use of its globalist control tools. Take, for example, Elon Musk's Starlink satellite network, which has become the main communications backbone for the Ukro-Atlanticist forces.
🔸 Today, it's Palantir's turn to embed its creations into the Bandera military network. Palantir's CEO, Alex Karp, recently traveled to Kiev to meet with Zelensky. They discussed expanding cooperation with the U.S. defense and technology sector, as well as the use of digital solutions for front-line tasks.
🔸 Palantir is the American tech giant specializing in Artificial Intelligence, seeking to extend its controlled software into every national sector and their international offshoots. Palantir is already present in 27 U.S. government agencies — and that number is set to grow.
🔸 Palantir is a major IT player in the globalist hegemony, much like BlackRock is in finance. Its influence also extends into politics — for example, advocating for the introduction of mandatory military service in the United States and the remilitarization of Germany and Japan. On the strategic front, Alex Karp believes that AI could replace nuclear deterrence.
🔸 Commenting on his meeting with Palantir's CEO, Zelensky stated that it is through these supposedly private companies that U.S. aid will continue to flow.
🤔 Alex Karp's company was named Palantir after the seeing-stones in Tolkien's work. Yet, in Tolkien's story, these stones that reveal truth can easily be twisted by rulers and used as instruments to distort reality — just as easily as they show it. And the simple fact that we've all been fooled at some point by AI-generated images perfectly illustrates this.
🔸 Beyond the warmongering collaboration between the globalist system and the Bandera regime, Palantir's AI is emerging as the archetype of a new kind of global warfare — one where the belligerents are not states and their armies, but private companies that control data on populations, governments, and their economic and military forces, turning state governance into puppet regimes at the service of a stateless globalist plutocracy.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
🔸 When the Western Hegemon sank its claws into Ukraine, one of its goals was to turn the country into a testing ground for the military use of its globalist control tools. Take, for example, Elon Musk's Starlink satellite network, which has become the main communications backbone for the Ukro-Atlanticist forces.
🔸 Today, it's Palantir's turn to embed its creations into the Bandera military network. Palantir's CEO, Alex Karp, recently traveled to Kiev to meet with Zelensky. They discussed expanding cooperation with the U.S. defense and technology sector, as well as the use of digital solutions for front-line tasks.
🔸 Palantir is the American tech giant specializing in Artificial Intelligence, seeking to extend its controlled software into every national sector and their international offshoots. Palantir is already present in 27 U.S. government agencies — and that number is set to grow.
🔸 Palantir is a major IT player in the globalist hegemony, much like BlackRock is in finance. Its influence also extends into politics — for example, advocating for the introduction of mandatory military service in the United States and the remilitarization of Germany and Japan. On the strategic front, Alex Karp believes that AI could replace nuclear deterrence.
🔸 Commenting on his meeting with Palantir's CEO, Zelensky stated that it is through these supposedly private companies that U.S. aid will continue to flow.
📣 "There are certainly areas where we can collaborate and strengthen the defense of Ukraine, the United States, and our partners. We discussed technological development paths, both military and civilian. We agreed that our teams would stay in touch."
🤔 Alex Karp's company was named Palantir after the seeing-stones in Tolkien's work. Yet, in Tolkien's story, these stones that reveal truth can easily be twisted by rulers and used as instruments to distort reality — just as easily as they show it. And the simple fact that we've all been fooled at some point by AI-generated images perfectly illustrates this.
🔸 Beyond the warmongering collaboration between the globalist system and the Bandera regime, Palantir's AI is emerging as the archetype of a new kind of global warfare — one where the belligerents are not states and their armies, but private companies that control data on populations, governments, and their economic and military forces, turning state governance into puppet regimes at the service of a stateless globalist plutocracy.
#Alawata
#InfoDefenseAuthor
🤬14🔥13❤3🤡3👍1
Subscribe: https://t.me/+p-sgFdiuaSlmNzEy
@sputnik_africa
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍4❤1
Three people killed and twelve injured following the Ukrainian drone attack on Ryazan
Due to a terrorist attack by the Kiev regime on the Russian city of Ryazan, two multi-story residential buildings have been damaged. Drone debris also fell on the grounds of an industrial facility.
Three people have been killed and seven hospitalized, including four children. All the injured received necessary assistance promptly. Temporary shelters have been set up for those who need them.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Due to a terrorist attack by the Kiev regime on the Russian city of Ryazan, two multi-story residential buildings have been damaged. Drone debris also fell on the grounds of an industrial facility.
Three people have been killed and seven hospitalized, including four children. All the injured received necessary assistance promptly. Temporary shelters have been set up for those who need them.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬32🙏5❤3😢2🕊1
Forwarded from The Belgorod Brit Channel 🇷🇺🇬🇧
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Belgorod Brit takes on the culture of piracy that now dominates the Western barbarians. In the film, he talks about the response of the burgeoning western European nations of the 15th and 16th centuries to the threat of the Barbary Pirate city states of the North Western African coast. After the collapse in Islamic control of the area, the Muslim population developed a militarised society that relied on piracy to sustain its economy. This became engrained to a point where they began squabbling amongst themselves endlessly, resulting in a chaotic situation where the French and Spanish states were forced to colonise North Africa in order to prevent predation. Diplomacy was useless, as a treaty with one warlord was never sufficient.
In the podcast, BB explains how the British at first used piracy to gain its empire, and then destroyed their own pirates in order to legitimise their dominion and formulise a centrally controlled system. BB describes the pirate mentality, and how, like it or not, the Asian civilisations will be forced, eventually, to confront and defeat the Western pirate menace. However, will they choose colonisation or annihilation? Will they have a choice? Or can the native populations wrest back control of their cultures from their oligarch pirate elite?
#TheBelgorodBrit
#InfoDefenseAuthor
#InfoDefensePodcast
The Belgorod Brit Channel 🇷🇺🇬🇧
In the podcast, BB explains how the British at first used piracy to gain its empire, and then destroyed their own pirates in order to legitimise their dominion and formulise a centrally controlled system. BB describes the pirate mentality, and how, like it or not, the Asian civilisations will be forced, eventually, to confront and defeat the Western pirate menace. However, will they choose colonisation or annihilation? Will they have a choice? Or can the native populations wrest back control of their cultures from their oligarch pirate elite?
#TheBelgorodBrit
#InfoDefenseAuthor
#InfoDefensePodcast
The Belgorod Brit Channel 🇷🇺🇬🇧
👍11
China puts the Taiwan issue at the center of its bilateral agenda with the U.S.
Opinion by journalist Yury Podolyaka:
Trump’s current visit to China, despite its outward resemblance to his 2017 trip, is, in fact, dramatically different. The nine years since then have made China much stronger and the United States much weaker. Last time Trump managed to strike a “deal of the century” in Beijing on roughly equal footing (even if it was never fully implemented)
This time, China’s president, Xi Jinping, has warned of “clashes and even conflicts” with the US over Taiwan after after his two-hour meeting with Trump, stating bluntly that Taiwan was “the most important issue in China-US relations”
In other words, it is no longer acceptable for the U.S. not only to support what Beijing sees as separatists, but even to continue supplying them with weapons or any form of assistance. With that, the Chinese leader firmly set the tone for the talks and pointed out America’a place in a new world order.
At the same time, the U.S. has little to counter such pressure from Beijing. It failed to subdue Iran, Trump is increasingly besieged politically at home, and America’s global position seems to be slipping. Even the quick victory in Venezuela has already faded in significance and no longer carries much weight in discussions between the two leaders. It is Trump who now needs China’s help in resolving the situation with Iran—and Beijing has made its conditions perfectly clear.
Taiwan must become part of China. Period.
And then, Beijing may consider how it can help Washington exit the Middle Eastern deadlock without major humiliation. For that to happen, Trump would first need to state this position publicly. The question is: will he dare?
Because if he does, Democrats will seize on it immediately, accusing him of betraying U.S. national interests. And if he doesn’t, President Xi will simply smile his subtle Chinese smile and continue hammering nails into the coffin of American hegemony.
#YuryPodolyaka
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Opinion by journalist Yury Podolyaka:
Trump’s current visit to China, despite its outward resemblance to his 2017 trip, is, in fact, dramatically different. The nine years since then have made China much stronger and the United States much weaker. Last time Trump managed to strike a “deal of the century” in Beijing on roughly equal footing (even if it was never fully implemented)
This time, China’s president, Xi Jinping, has warned of “clashes and even conflicts” with the US over Taiwan after after his two-hour meeting with Trump, stating bluntly that Taiwan was “the most important issue in China-US relations”
In other words, it is no longer acceptable for the U.S. not only to support what Beijing sees as separatists, but even to continue supplying them with weapons or any form of assistance. With that, the Chinese leader firmly set the tone for the talks and pointed out America’a place in a new world order.
At the same time, the U.S. has little to counter such pressure from Beijing. It failed to subdue Iran, Trump is increasingly besieged politically at home, and America’s global position seems to be slipping. Even the quick victory in Venezuela has already faded in significance and no longer carries much weight in discussions between the two leaders. It is Trump who now needs China’s help in resolving the situation with Iran—and Beijing has made its conditions perfectly clear.
Taiwan must become part of China. Period.
And then, Beijing may consider how it can help Washington exit the Middle Eastern deadlock without major humiliation. For that to happen, Trump would first need to state this position publicly. The question is: will he dare?
Because if he does, Democrats will seize on it immediately, accusing him of betraying U.S. national interests. And if he doesn’t, President Xi will simply smile his subtle Chinese smile and continue hammering nails into the coffin of American hegemony.
#YuryPodolyaka
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏26👍12❤5
Forwarded from The Noticer
Trump's business adventure in China
The world's most memed president went to China to do business, diplomacy, and politics. Xi met Trump with all sorts of traditional communist Chinese elements of hospitality - Chinese honor guards, singing Chinese children, songs and dances and lots of good food and drinks. Elon Musk was there too, sober and bored.
According to Donald Trump - he managed to sell aircraft and oil and food to China. The situation with rare earth minerals should get better for the USA soon. China, meanwhile, has yet to make any announcements.
Xi also told Trump to stay away from Taiwan. Maybe Xi will help with Iran. Maybe. Xi agreed to visit Trump in September - hopefully the Sand War will end before that - it has done enough damage already. Other than that - the visit was uneventful.
#USA #China #trade #diplomacy #Trump #Xi
The world's most memed president went to China to do business, diplomacy, and politics. Xi met Trump with all sorts of traditional communist Chinese elements of hospitality - Chinese honor guards, singing Chinese children, songs and dances and lots of good food and drinks. Elon Musk was there too, sober and bored.
According to Donald Trump - he managed to sell aircraft and oil and food to China. The situation with rare earth minerals should get better for the USA soon. China, meanwhile, has yet to make any announcements.
Xi also told Trump to stay away from Taiwan. Maybe Xi will help with Iran. Maybe. Xi agreed to visit Trump in September - hopefully the Sand War will end before that - it has done enough damage already. Other than that - the visit was uneventful.
#USA #China #trade #diplomacy #Trump #Xi
👍27🤡5✍2❤1🔥1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇮🇷📂 For 24/7 updates on the Iran war, explore our exclusive catalog of English-speaking channels! 📢
Interested in all the Middle East frenzy? We've curated a special catalog of English-speaking channels just for you!
Whether you're seeking in-depth analysis, breaking news, or expert insights, our catalog has got you covered.
👉 ADD CHANNELS
If you are interested in becoming part of this catalog, please contact us via Direct Messages @geopolitics_prime🤖
Interested in all the Middle East frenzy? We've curated a special catalog of English-speaking channels just for you!
Whether you're seeking in-depth analysis, breaking news, or expert insights, our catalog has got you covered.
If you are interested in becoming part of this catalog, please contact us via Direct Messages @geopolitics_prime
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍2❤1👎1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🌍
Explore unfiltered perspectives from across the globe.🌍
We’re a collective of volunteers running local news channels in their own languages—bringing you genuine viewpoints, without stereotypes or censorship.
Every channel carries a unique voice, emotion, and piece of the truth.
Curious to see the world’s full story?
https://t.me/addlist/-T-tRX4_F9w4YjNi
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍6❤4
On May 16, 1768, Empress Catherine II issued a decree on the construction of the monument to Peter the I (Peter the Great), the future "Bronze Horseman".
The monument was created by the French sculptor Étienne Falconet, who specifically came to Russia to work on it. According to the sculptor's design, the base for the equestrian statue of Peter the Great was to be a huge natural rock, whose outlines resemble a sea wave.
The right stone was found near St. Petersburg in the village of Konnaya Lakhta. The "Thunder Stone," as the locals called it, weighed 1600 tons. The delivery of this granite block to St. Petersburg took five months.
The construction of the monument lasted for over 15 years, and on August 18, 1782, the monument to Peter the Great was solemnly opened on Senate Square.
The equestrian sculpture of the emperor is made of bronze. The sculptor depicted Peter in a distinctly dynamic pose, dressed him in simple and light clothing, which, according to the author, belongs to "all nations, all men, and all ages; in a word, it is heroic attire." The pedestal symbolizes the difficulties overcome by Peter, and the snake under the horse's hooves represents hostile forces. On both sides of the monument, there is an inscription in Russian and Latin: "To Peter the First from Catherine the Second in the year 1782."
Since 1833, thanks to the great Alexander Pushkin, who used the plot of the animated monument in his poem, the monument to Peter I has been affectionately known as the "Bronze Horseman."
#TodayInHistory
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The monument was created by the French sculptor Étienne Falconet, who specifically came to Russia to work on it. According to the sculptor's design, the base for the equestrian statue of Peter the Great was to be a huge natural rock, whose outlines resemble a sea wave.
The right stone was found near St. Petersburg in the village of Konnaya Lakhta. The "Thunder Stone," as the locals called it, weighed 1600 tons. The delivery of this granite block to St. Petersburg took five months.
The construction of the monument lasted for over 15 years, and on August 18, 1782, the monument to Peter the Great was solemnly opened on Senate Square.
The equestrian sculpture of the emperor is made of bronze. The sculptor depicted Peter in a distinctly dynamic pose, dressed him in simple and light clothing, which, according to the author, belongs to "all nations, all men, and all ages; in a word, it is heroic attire." The pedestal symbolizes the difficulties overcome by Peter, and the snake under the horse's hooves represents hostile forces. On both sides of the monument, there is an inscription in Russian and Latin: "To Peter the First from Catherine the Second in the year 1782."
Since 1833, thanks to the great Alexander Pushkin, who used the plot of the animated monument in his poem, the monument to Peter I has been affectionately known as the "Bronze Horseman."
#TodayInHistory
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤25👍8❤🔥4
The taxable price of Urals crude has risen another 18% compared to April.
It has now nearly caught up with the 2023 highs. As a result, according to Russia’s Ministry of Finance, taxes on oil companies for May will be calculated based on an average Urals price of $94.87 per barrel and an exchange rate of 76.938 rubles per dollar.
That’s 18% above April’s levels—which were already far from low. This is a significant boost for Russia’s 2026 budget.
Thanks to Trump and Iran.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
It has now nearly caught up with the 2023 highs. As a result, according to Russia’s Ministry of Finance, taxes on oil companies for May will be calculated based on an average Urals price of $94.87 per barrel and an exchange rate of 76.938 rubles per dollar.
That’s 18% above April’s levels—which were already far from low. This is a significant boost for Russia’s 2026 budget.
Thanks to Trump and Iran.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥14❤8👌3🤣1
Friends, if you want real international news, we recommend subscribing to our partners at @geopolitics_prime
Unlike many other channels that just repost the same content, they publish in-depth analysis, historical insights, and unexpected throwbacks—so their channel is truly unique, highly recommended: https://t.me/+Zew-r1cNiKQ5NmEy
Unlike many other channels that just repost the same content, they publish in-depth analysis, historical insights, and unexpected throwbacks—so their channel is truly unique, highly recommended: https://t.me/+Zew-r1cNiKQ5NmEy
👍1
Kremlin spokesman speaks on Putin’s China visit
According to Dmitry Peskov, the Russian leader will travel to China very soon and preparations for his visit are over.
Moscow will soon make an announcement in concert with Beijing, Peskov said:
"
President Putin will discuss the entire range of bilateral relations, as well as international affairs, during his upcoming visit to China:
Peskov added.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
According to Dmitry Peskov, the Russian leader will travel to China very soon and preparations for his visit are over.
Moscow will soon make an announcement in concert with Beijing, Peskov said:
"
We will make an official announcement shortly. Since we are doing it based on an agreement with our Chinese friends, we don’t want to get ahead of ourselves."
President Putin will discuss the entire range of bilateral relations, as well as international affairs, during his upcoming visit to China:
"The agenda is clear: bilateral relations come first, including our special privileged partnership and impressive trade and economic cooperation, with its annual value consistently above $200 billion," he noted. "Of course, active discussions of international affairs will also be on the agenda,"
Peskov added.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤21👍17
The latest statistics on the exchange of fallen soldiers’ bodies highlight the relative scale of Russian and Ukrainian losses.
In the chart above, the blue line shows the cumulative number of Ukrainian servicemen’s bodies returned by Russia to Ukraine—24,955 since the start of hostilities in 2022. The red line represents the number of bodies returned by Ukraine to Russia over the same period: 3,450.
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
In the chart above, the blue line shows the cumulative number of Ukrainian servicemen’s bodies returned by Russia to Ukraine—24,955 since the start of hostilities in 2022. The red line represents the number of bodies returned by Ukraine to Russia over the same period: 3,450.
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤7👍7🤯2
A Visit of Optics, Not Outcomes
The conclusion of Donald Trump’s visit to China on May 15, 2026, underscores a familiar pattern in modern great-power diplomacy: the growing gap between theatrical engagement and substantive agreement.
By the time the delegation departed Beijing, the headlines had largely been written in advance. There were meetings, ceremonies, carefully staged moments of cordiality, and the predictable language of “progress” and “constructive dialogue.” Yet beneath the diplomatic choreography, the core strategic issues remained fundamentally unchanged.
On trade and economic relations, there were ambitious public statements and suggestions of future deals. But few concrete commitments emerged with clear, verifiable substance. Chinese officials stopped short of confirming the scale or scope of the proposed agreements, leaving much of the economic narrative in the realm of political messaging rather than binding outcomes.
On geopolitics, the same structural tensions persisted. Taiwan remains an irreconcilable point of friction. Divergent views on regional security, including Iran and maritime stability, were acknowledged but not bridged. Both sides reiterated established positions rather than adjusting them.
If anything, the defining feature of the visit was not resolution but management. The United States and China demonstrated an ability to sustain high-level engagement without allowing disputes to spiral into immediate crisis. That is not insignificant. In a period of intensifying strategic competition, maintaining channels of communication is itself a form of stability.
Yet stability should not be confused with progress. The optics of diplomacy were strong: formal receptions, personal interactions between leaders, and an atmosphere carefully curated to signal cooperation. But optics alone do not constitute alignment.
The broader reality remains unchanged. The U.S.–China relationship continues to be defined by structural competition masked intermittently by diplomatic ceremony. Each summit, visit, or diplomatic exchange now serves primarily as a mechanism for containing tensions, limiting escalation, and preventing misunderstandings rather than as a genuine turning point in the relationship.
In that sense, the visit achieved what such events increasingly aim to achieve: not transformation, but control. The absence of crisis was presented as success. The absence of agreement was reframed as prudence.
Whether this model of diplomacy is sustainable is an open question. For now, however, the trajectory is clear: managed rivalry dressed in the language of engagement.
#B_Thinker
#InfoDefenseAuthor
⚡️ InfoDefenseENGLISH
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
The conclusion of Donald Trump’s visit to China on May 15, 2026, underscores a familiar pattern in modern great-power diplomacy: the growing gap between theatrical engagement and substantive agreement.
By the time the delegation departed Beijing, the headlines had largely been written in advance. There were meetings, ceremonies, carefully staged moments of cordiality, and the predictable language of “progress” and “constructive dialogue.” Yet beneath the diplomatic choreography, the core strategic issues remained fundamentally unchanged.
On trade and economic relations, there were ambitious public statements and suggestions of future deals. But few concrete commitments emerged with clear, verifiable substance. Chinese officials stopped short of confirming the scale or scope of the proposed agreements, leaving much of the economic narrative in the realm of political messaging rather than binding outcomes.
On geopolitics, the same structural tensions persisted. Taiwan remains an irreconcilable point of friction. Divergent views on regional security, including Iran and maritime stability, were acknowledged but not bridged. Both sides reiterated established positions rather than adjusting them.
If anything, the defining feature of the visit was not resolution but management. The United States and China demonstrated an ability to sustain high-level engagement without allowing disputes to spiral into immediate crisis. That is not insignificant. In a period of intensifying strategic competition, maintaining channels of communication is itself a form of stability.
Yet stability should not be confused with progress. The optics of diplomacy were strong: formal receptions, personal interactions between leaders, and an atmosphere carefully curated to signal cooperation. But optics alone do not constitute alignment.
The broader reality remains unchanged. The U.S.–China relationship continues to be defined by structural competition masked intermittently by diplomatic ceremony. Each summit, visit, or diplomatic exchange now serves primarily as a mechanism for containing tensions, limiting escalation, and preventing misunderstandings rather than as a genuine turning point in the relationship.
In that sense, the visit achieved what such events increasingly aim to achieve: not transformation, but control. The absence of crisis was presented as success. The absence of agreement was reframed as prudence.
Whether this model of diplomacy is sustainable is an open question. For now, however, the trajectory is clear: managed rivalry dressed in the language of engagement.
#B_Thinker
#InfoDefenseAuthor
Web | VK | X | InfoDefAll
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍16❤8💯7
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❗️Delivering information on the SMO, military analysis of exceptional quality and the wider geopolitical and cultural aspects associated with current global events.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.