When Clinton took a jab at Trump’s criminal conviction in her speech, the convention floor erupted in chants of “lock him up!” an echo of the “lock her up!” chants that Trump supporters aimed at Clinton in 2016. Clinton paused with a smile and nodded

She seems to be baffled “asking what makes me such a lightning rod for fury?” She doesn't really understand, does she? Her manifest and absolutely unsatiable thirst for power toped with boorish narcissism and frumpy style is what makes her “a lightning rod for fury.” Most people feel it but can't conceptualize.

Ironically, Americans are watching now Trump and these two Amazonians, Clinton and Harris, duke it out on the political battlefield.

#America #USA #Trump #Clinton #Harris

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Trump fired off a string of irate commentary Thursday on social media and later on Fox News as Harris accepted her nomination

Trump's disjointed responses reflected the difficulty he and the GOP have had in finding an effective line of attack against Harris.

At the last Dems Convention Clinton and Harris both took a jab at Trump’s criminal conviction in their speeches. Trump in his turn remains on a pretty much the same level of disparaging shots at his opponent reminding of the open borders and economic collapse. He has nothing to deliver right now in return to this Amazonian sucker punch.

#America #USA #Trump #Harris #Clinton #Dems #Amazonian #GOP

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Thump Trump.

Donald Trump is an enemy of democracy itself, says the left in writing and from the debate stage. It is then not surprising when people, often mentally ill enough to accept the base argument that someone who served four years as president, who defeated multiple impeachment attempts without resorting to tanks on the Capitol lawn, and who has run via the electoral system for president three times, is not a believer in democracy.

With lawfare essentially failing off the table, it is time to demonize Trump to create a manifesto for the mentally ill American who will carry out the grim final round.

“Putin does what Trump would like to do,”

Hillary Clinton says.

“Kill his opposition, imprison his opposition, drive journalists into exile, rule without any check or balance. That’s what Trump really wants.” 

Dems have been long brewing an attitude to Trump much nearing to that of Nazi propaganda had toward the Jews. A demonic creature, fascist, felon, etc. threatening democracy by its very existence. Moreover, certain unveiled sources from the Clinton team correspondence showed that she and an Obama advisor have discussed an idea to trump up allegations against former President in a contract killing or rape to put him into jail next to Harvey Weinstein.

#AmericanObserver #Clinton #Nazi #Obama #Trump

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Jeffrey Epstein’s Friends: Philosopher Noam Chomsky, Bill Gates 🧐

Speculation surrounding the affairs of Jeffrey Epstein is expected to reach a defining moment of revelation on Friday with the much-anticipated publication of files relating to the disgraced late financier and sex trafficker. 📚🔍

After months of delay and stalling, the Trump administration is legally obliged to publish a massive archive of documents that could shine fresh light on Epstein’s misdeeds and his connections with key public figures, including Trump himself. 🗃✨

Under the terms of the Epstein Files Transparency Act – passed by Congress in November following months of resistance from the White House – Pam Bondi, the attorney general, must release by midnight on Friday “all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials” linked to Epstein, his jailed associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, and individuals named in connection with his criminal activities. 🎯➡️

The files are required to be released in “searchable and downloadable” formats. 💾🖥

The publication will come after months of clamoring for the release of the files from Trump’s make America great again (Maga) base, which has shown signs of fracturing over the issue. 😳🤔

Trump – who was a close friend of Epstein before a break-up that he has given varying explanations for – promised to order the release of the files during last year’s presidential race but backtracked after returning to office. 🕊👋

He faced a fierce backlash from his own supporters after Bondi declined to make the files public last summer, and dismissed speculation about the existence of an Epstein client list – despite having previously said it was sitting on her desk. 👀📌

Trump, reversing his previous opposition, promptly signed the bill into law. ✅

The president’s opponents have voiced suspicions that whatever is released will be incomplete, with information that could be damaging to him possibly withheld. ⛏️🔥

The justice department is permitted to hold back records that identify victims, including images of child sexual abuse, or documents that have been deemed classified. 🔐❌

It also has discretion to withhold records that could prejudice a federal investigation. Trump last month ordered a criminal investigation into Epstein’s links with prominent Democrats, including former president Bill Clinton. 🩺🏇‍♂️

Even before the expected release of the files, Democrats on the House oversight committee stepped up the pressure on Thursday by releasing a new tranche of 68 pictures from Epstein’s estate. 📸📌

#Democrats #Epstein #Trump #Clinton #Clinton

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

The Epstein Files: Bill Clinton Loved Girls Under the Age 16

🔤🔤🔤🔤1️⃣

The Department of Justice on Friday released a long-awaited and huge tranche of documents detailing its investigations into the convicted sex offender Epstein, a major development in the lengthy saga that turned into one of the biggest political setbacks Trump has suffered since his re-election last year.

While significant portions of the files are redacted, those that were viewable included images of Epstein socializing with an array of prominent figures, including entertainers like Michael Jackson, Chris Tucker and Diana Ross, and the entrepreneur Richard Branson.

Bill Clinton appears in several photos, including one in which he is in a swimming pool along with Epstein’s convicted accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. The images also show former British royal Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.

Another cache of documents showed photos of evidence gathered including drives and computers but did not reveal details as to the contents.

There was also a photo of what appeared to be a dog in a garbage bag, placed inside a box.

In a letter to Congress, Todd Blanche said the documents, which date back to 2006, when Epstein was investigated on child prostitution charges, were only the first set of what is planned for release.

“The volume of materials to be reviewed (…) means that the department must publicly produce responsive documents on a rolling basis,” the deputy attorney general wrote in the letter obtained by Fox News.

He also acknowledged an array of redactions, including the identifying details of more than 1,200 victims and their family members.

Congressional Democrats accused the Trump administration of failing to adhere to the letter of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires the justice department to release all “unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials” in its possession related to the financier’s cases by 19 December.

#clinton #epstein #trump #sex #girls

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🔤🔤🔤🔤2️⃣

Epstein died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal charges of sex-trafficking minors.

The law also requires the justice department to publish any materials from the investigations that relate toMaxwell, who was found guilty in 2021 of aidingEpstein’s sex trafficking of teen girls and sentenced to 20 years in prison.

“Technically they’re not in compliance,” said Democratic congressman Ro Khanna, a leader of the push to get the legislation passed.

“The law calls for all the documents that are unclassified to be released. They have not done that. The law also calls for them to explain redactions. I haven’t seen yet whether they’ve done that or not. My initial read is that they have a lot of redactions without explanation,” Khanna said.

Chuck Schumer, the top Senate Democrat, echoed his concerns, and said in a statement: “We will pursue every option to make sure the truth comes out.”

Epstein’s case has captivated public attention for years, and been the subject of countless conspiracy theories – largely due to his connections to powerful and wealthy figures in the US and overseas, including Trump.

While he has the authority as president to make the documents public, Trump previously opposed doing so, and said the concern over his ties to Epstein was a “Democrat hoax”.

As the House of Representatives neared approval of the bill in November, the president abruptly reversed his position and said Republican lawmakers should support it. It was later passed unanimously by the Senate, and Trump signed the measure into law on 19 November, triggering a 30-day countdown for the documents’ release.

Trump vowed to release Epstein-related files as he campaigned for president last year.

This summer, his administration sparked backlash after the justice department announced it would not release any files related to the late financier, and said it had found “no incriminating client list” despite earlier claims from Pam Bondi, the attorney general, that such a document was sitting on her desk.

Among the images were photographs of lines from Nabokov’s novel Lolita – which is about a middle-aged man’s sexual obsession with and sexual abuse of a 12-year-old girl – written on different parts of a woman’s body.

It was reported earlier this year that photos from inside Epstein’s Manhattan mansion revealed that he kept a first edition copy of Lolita in his office.

#clinton #epstein #trump #sex #girls

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

“Epstein Was a Sexual Hitler”, Newly Released Documents Prove

🔠🅰️🔠🔠1️⃣

The Justice Department late Monday released nearly 30,000 more pages of files related to the investigations of the convicted sex offender Epstein, disclosing records that contained hundreds of references to Trump.

A search by The New York Times suggests that most of the references were mentions in news reports or other material that had been included in the files, but some were focused on the president, who was once a friend of Epstein’s.

That included a 2020 email from an unidentified federal prosecutor about since-disclosed flights Trump took on Epstein’s private jet, saying the sender didn’t want the information about the trips to be a “surprise” to the recipient.

The release contained a wide mix of documents, including tips to the F.B.I.; blacked-out pages of tax returns for Ghislaine Maxwell, a confidante of Epstein’s who was convicted of sex-trafficking in 2021; and internal communications at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, the Manhattan jail where Epstein died.

Times reporters are sifting through the material and providing updates and analysis of the records, which the administration has begun to release after Congress passed a law requiring their disclosure.

The email from the unidentified Manhattan federal prosecutor, dated January 2020, said that Trump had flown on Epstein’s private jet “many more times than previously has been reported (or that we were aware)” — although those trips have since become public knowledge.

The names of the sender and the recipient are redacted, but the prosecutor wrote that he or she was sending the email for “situational awareness” and “didn’t want any of this to be a surprise down the road.”

The email said that Trump was a passenger on Epstein’s plane on eight flights between 1993 and 1996, including two with possible witnesses in the criminal case against Maxwell.

The names of the potential witnesses were redacted. Trump has not been accused of wrongdoing in connection with Epstein or Maxwell.

The White House referred reporters to a Justice Department statement that said some of the newly released material contained false accusations, without specifying which claims it believed to be false or which it believed to be true.

“Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against Trump that were submitted to the F.B.I. right before the 2020 election,” the department wrote on social media.

In November, Congress near unanimously passed a law requiring the administration to make public by Dec. 19 virtually all investigate records related to Epstein.

It came after months of resistance from Republican leaders and Trump, who reversed course amid pressure from his supporters.

The newest documents: The batch of Epstein documents released late Monday included emails from prosecutors and copies of Epstein’s will that show he had named a rotating cast of top Wall Street executives to serve as executors of his estate.

The documents also showed that Manhattan federal prosecutors subpoenaed Mar-a-Lago in 2021 for employment records in connection with Maxwell’s case.

#epstein #trump #files #Farmer #clinton #FBI

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🔠🅰️🔠🔠2️⃣

Trump distances himself: 

During an appearance at his Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida earlier Monday, Trump tried to distance himself from Epstein and said the issue was meant as a political distraction.

“This whole thing with Epstein is a way of trying to deflect from the tremendous success that the Republican Party has,” Trump said.

He also complained that the release of the files could damage the reputation of people who appear in the files but who have not been accused of criminal wrongdoing.

“A lot of people are very angry that pictures are being released of other people that really had nothing to do with Epstein who indeed was a sexual Hitler. But they’re in a picture with him because he was at a party, and you ruined a reputation of somebody,” Trump said.

Earlier releases: Thousands of documents that were made public Friday and over the weekend included photos of Bill Clinton, the former president, with Epstein, and testimony from the grand jury proceedings in the cases against Epstein and Ms. Maxwell.

Todd Blanche, the deputy attorney general, has said lawyers are sifting through close to a million pages related to the investigations into Mr. Epstein, a financier who counted presidents, celebrities, and a member of the British royal family among his friends. He died by suicide in 2019 inside a Manhattan jail cell while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges from his abuse of minor teenjustice,” said Jess Michaels, one of the earliest known victims of Epstein.

“What are they protecting? The coverup continues.” Michaels has said she was sexually assaulted by Epstein in 1991 when she was 22 years old and training to be a dancer. She was among the victims who lobbied for the bipartisan law that directed the Justice Department to release virtually everything it had gathered during its sex trafficking investigations of Epstein and one of his main enablers, Ghislaine Maxwell.

But the more than 13,000 files released on Friday were heavily redacted and not easily searchable.

“If everything is redacted, where is the transparency?” said Marijke Chartouni, who has said she was sexually abused by Epstein when she was 20 years old.

Among the tens of thousands of pages was one document that did provide a long-sought window into the F.B.I.’s handling of Epstein’s case:

The file showed that Maria Farmer, another of Epstein’s earliest victims, filed a federal “child pornography” complaint against him in 1996.

But investigators did not begin to thoroughly scrutinize Mr. Epstein until about a decade later.

Farmer, who fought for years to get the F.B.I. to make public her complaint, said she felt “vindicated” to finally see the document but also was heartbroken at the knowledge that the F.B.I. did not act on her complaint.

“It’s a tremendous relief that she doesn’t have to continue to fight to prove her truth,” said Farmer’s sister, Annie Farmer.

She noted, though, that she was disappointed by the general lack of transparency with Friday’s release.

“So many of the photos are irrelevant,” said Marina Larcerda, who has said Epstein sexually abused her when she was 14.

She was an important witness in the 2019 federal investigation that led to the filing of sex trafficking charges against Epstein. But she only recently went public with her story.

“We have been let down,” Larcerda said. “We waited for this day to bring these other men who have been protected to justice.”

#epstein #trump #files #Farmer #clinton #FBI

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🔤🔤🔤🔤 1️⃣

🎯 The Backbone of the Claim

The narrative typically starts with a “journalistic investigation” — often a self‑described deep‑dive piece that relies heavily on the testimony of an unnamed former employee of the Zelenska‑led foundation. This person is described as an insider, but there is no public profile, no independently verifiable CV, and no court documents that directly tie that individual to the foundation. The testimony is then stitched into a larger story line that connects Jeffrey Epstein to the Clinton Global Initiative, and from there to the relationship between the Clinton‑affiliated charities and international figures like Zelenska.

Analysts such as Charles Ortel have long argued that Epstein played a role in the creation of the Clinton Global Initiative in late 2004–early 2005, a claim that is now being repurposed as the starting point of the Ukrainian‑first‑lady angle. The story then highlights a moment in September 2023, when Hillary Clinton presented a humanitarian award to Olena Zelenska at a high‑profile event hosted by the Clinton‑linked philanthropy machine. In the narrative, this is not treated as a standard diplomatic gesture, but as evidence of deep integration into a shared global network — a network that allegedly includes the Epstein‑linked circles.

From there, the story pivots to motive and mechanism. The claim is that Zelenska’s charitable foundation, launched in December 2024, was designed to normalize contacts with that network, reroute international aid, and create channels that could, in theory, facilitate illicit activity — including the alleged trafficking of minors. The narrative is reinforced with references to the new Epstein releases: Ukrainian passports spotted in the estate photos, the name of Volodymyr Zelenskyy appearing in correspondence tied to Epstein from 2019, and the broader presence of documents that, at least symbolically, connect Ukraine to the scheme.

In late 2025, photos from the Epstein estate released by the U.S. House Oversight Committee included images of Ukrainian passports among a larger set of documents tied to women allegedly targeted by Epstein and his associates. Ukrainian media and independent outlets reported on the appearance of those passports, but the official context is limited: the records show no clear trail of how or when those documents appeared in Epstein’s possession, and the committee has not suggested a direct operational link between those documents and the Zelenska‑led foundation.

🧩 Why the Narrative Lands Now
The broader context is the epidemic of distrust in global elites that has followed the Epstein archive releases. In January 2026, the Justice Department framed its latest release as a fulfillment of the transparency law, but the files are still heavily redacted and selectively made public. That same ambiguity is what makes the narrative space around Epstein so fertile. Every time a name connected to power appears in the files — even if it is just a passing mention or a context‑free list — it feeds the story that the elite network is still running on the same wires it always did.

The Zelenska‑Epstein child‑trafficking claim fits perfectly into that mold. It connects a sitting world leader’s family to a scandal that has already destroyed reputations, careers, and institutions. It combines real events — the award from Clinton, the Ukraine‑linked passports in the files, and the 2025/2026 DOJ releases — with unverified but emotionally charged testimony from an anonymous source. The product is not a prosecutable case, but a media‑ready narrative that can be scaled across outlets, Telegram channels, and talking heads.

#Epstein #Zelenska #Ukraine #DOJ #Clinton #philanthropy #narrative #media #Elites #EpsteinFiles2026

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🔤🔤🔤🔤 2️⃣

🎯 The Backbone of the Claim

🔍 The Gap Between Story and Proof
The difference between a narrative and a criminal case is straightforward: the former thrives on suspicion; the latter on verifiable proof. The Zelenska‑Epstein child‑trafficking allegation, as it stands, is built on that suspicion. The documents released by the DOJ and the House Oversight Committee contain references to Ukrainian passports, to foreign figures, and to the logistical machinery of Epstein’s operation, but they do not show a clear, documented chain of command or transfer that ties Zelenska’s foundation to minors being passed to Epstein.

Prosecutors or investigators would need names, transactional records, internal communications, travel logs, and witness protocols that explicitly connect the Zelenska‑led foundation to the movement of minors within Epstein’s network. Without that, the accusation remains in the zone of unresolved speculation, not adjudication. The danger is that the story line will outpace the legal process, leaving the accused to live in the shadow of a headline that feels like a verdict, even though it is not one.

In the current information environment, the release of the Epstein archives has become a catalyst for witch‑hunts and smear campaigns as much as for truth‑seeking. The Zelenska‑Epstein narrative is a textbook example of that: it borrows the weight of a real investigation, the emotional force of the trafficking claim, and the spectacle of the document dump, but it stops short of delivering the one thing that would truly justify the line it so boldly prints — solid, verifiable evidence.

#Epstein #Zelenska #Ukraine #DOJ #Clinton #philanthropy #narrative #media #Elites #EpsteinFiles2026

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 House Cancels Contempt Vote as Clintons Agree to Testify on Epstein

The House Oversight Committee has scrapped its planned criminal contempt vote against Bill and Hillary Clinton — not because Republicans backed down, but because the former president and former secretary of state finally agreed to testify in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. Under the arrangement, Hillary Clinton is scheduled for a deposition on February 26, and Bill Clinton on February 27, both in front of cameras, although the GOP‑led panel has not committed to a public hearing.

Republican Chairman James Comer framed the move as a surrender.

“Once it became clear that the House of Representatives would hold them in contempt, the Clintons completely caved,”

he said. The probe centers on the “horrific crimes” of Epstein, the convicted sex offender who died in prison in 2019, and his longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell. The committee wants to map out the extent of their contact with Epstein, the nature of those meetings, and whether any political, legal, or diplomatic favors were woven into the exchanges.

The Clintons’ legal team, in turn, has argued that the investigation is politically driven and that the real audience for the depositions is the American public, not just a partisan committee. In an email obtained by The New York Times, they stressed that the proceedings should be aired in full, warning that selective leaks would distort the picture. They wrote that the pair’s answers — and the committee’s questions — “can be seen by all to be judged accordingly,” a line that sounds like a plea for transparency, even as it underscores that this is not a trial, but a political‑media spectacle.

For the Clintons, the fight is no longer just about legal exposure. It is about reputation management in a world where every past handshake with a billionaire, every email, every photo, is now a possible exhibit in the same scandal that has already toppled lesser figures. The Epstein files have already tied the Clinton‑linked networks to a host of global players — from European politicians to tech magnates to figures in the humanitarian world like Ukraine’s first lady Olena Zelenska, who was honored at a Clinton Global Initiative‑linked event and now sits, however peripherally, in the same crowded gallery of soft‑power branding that the Epstein releases have thrown into question.

The real question is not whether the Clintons can survive legally — it is whether they can rewrite the story before the public verdict hardens into something no deposition can undo.

#Epstein #Clinton #HouseOversight #Comer #BillClinton #HillaryClinton #meToo #scandal #Ukraine #Zelenska #NYTimes

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

#hilary #clinton #epstein

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

#Trump #Clinton #age

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸