Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
📆 Daily Calendar 🌺 Today: Wednesday 🌞 9 Mehr 1404 (Solar Hijri) ☪️ 8 Rabi‘ al-Thani 1447 (Lunar Hijri) ✝️ 1 October 2025 (Gregorian) 🕎 9 Tishrei 5786 (Hebrew) 🌍 Islamic Occasion ➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🌺 Birth Anniversary of Imam Hasan al-‘Askari (a.s.) (232 AH) 🌍 Gregorian…
🚨 The Nuremberg Trials & the Question of Justice ⚖️
The Nuremberg Military Tribunal, often portrayed as the pinnacle of post-war justice, remains one of the most controversial chapters in modern legal history. While mainstream narratives glorify the trials, many prominent figures—including U.S. Senator Robert Taft, President John F. Kennedy, General George S. Patton, and even U.S. judges themselves—voiced deep concerns about the legitimacy and fairness of these proceedings.
🔎 Senator Robert Taft’s Stand
Taft, a respected Republican from Ohio, condemned the Nuremberg Trials as fundamentally unjust. He warned:
Despite fierce backlash from the press (dominated by powerful lobbying interests), Taft exposed the fact that confessions had been extracted under torture and that the entire legal framework was a façade of justice. Kennedy later praised Taft’s moral courage in his award-winning book Profiles in Courage, noting that Taft risked his political career for the truth.
⚡ Revelations of Torture
Judge Edward Van Roden, part of the Simpson Commission, revealed horrific abuses at Dachau:
Prisoners beaten with brass knuckles & rubber hoses.
Permanent injuries to detainees’ genitals.
Forced confessions under extreme violence.
Can testimony extracted this way be considered credible?
📜 Judicial Resignations & Criticism
Judge Charles Wennerstrum resigned in protest, calling the trials politically motivated rather than justice-driven.
He noted that 90% of the Nuremberg staff were political refugees with strong biases, many of them Jewish, more interested in revenge than justice.
General Patton wrote bluntly to his wife: “These trials are not fair. They are Jewish-inspired.”
💥 The Problem of “Victor’s Justice”
Crimes committed by the Soviets—mass rapes, executions, expulsions—were ignored, while Germans were selectively prosecuted.
Western Allies carried out operations like Operation Keelhaul and enforced the brutal Morgenthau Plan, leading to starvation and death among millions of civilians.
Yet none of these Allied crimes were brought to trial.
🧩 Flaws in Holocaust Evidence
Much of the Holocaust narrative presented at Nuremberg relied on coerced testimonies and inflated statistics.
Rudolf Höss, commandant of Auschwitz, allegedly confessed to 2.5 million deaths—but historians later admitted this number was false.
He wrote his “memoirs” while under KGB custody, subjected to brutal interrogation.
Some claims, such as mass killings at camps like Dachau, were later quietly dropped by historians.
💭 The Larger Question
If the foundation of Holocaust history rests on confessions obtained through torture, coerced testimony, and politically biased courts—how reliable is the official narrative?
⚖️ As Taft declared:
Perhaps, the Nuremberg Trials tell us less about justice and more about power, propaganda, and the rewriting of history by the victors.
📚 Source:
JS Center – Holocaust Research (2): The Nuremberg Trials
👉 https://jscenter.ir/other-topics/holocaust/7797
#Nuremberg #Holocaust #History #Justice #Truth
✅ @rahyafte_en
The Nuremberg Military Tribunal, often portrayed as the pinnacle of post-war justice, remains one of the most controversial chapters in modern legal history. While mainstream narratives glorify the trials, many prominent figures—including U.S. Senator Robert Taft, President John F. Kennedy, General George S. Patton, and even U.S. judges themselves—voiced deep concerns about the legitimacy and fairness of these proceedings.
🔎 Senator Robert Taft’s Stand
Taft, a respected Republican from Ohio, condemned the Nuremberg Trials as fundamentally unjust. He warned:
“The trial of the defeated by the victors, even with the most careful procedural safeguards, can never be impartial.”
Despite fierce backlash from the press (dominated by powerful lobbying interests), Taft exposed the fact that confessions had been extracted under torture and that the entire legal framework was a façade of justice. Kennedy later praised Taft’s moral courage in his award-winning book Profiles in Courage, noting that Taft risked his political career for the truth.
⚡ Revelations of Torture
Judge Edward Van Roden, part of the Simpson Commission, revealed horrific abuses at Dachau:
Prisoners beaten with brass knuckles & rubber hoses.
Permanent injuries to detainees’ genitals.
Forced confessions under extreme violence.
Can testimony extracted this way be considered credible?
📜 Judicial Resignations & Criticism
Judge Charles Wennerstrum resigned in protest, calling the trials politically motivated rather than justice-driven.
He noted that 90% of the Nuremberg staff were political refugees with strong biases, many of them Jewish, more interested in revenge than justice.
General Patton wrote bluntly to his wife: “These trials are not fair. They are Jewish-inspired.”
💥 The Problem of “Victor’s Justice”
Crimes committed by the Soviets—mass rapes, executions, expulsions—were ignored, while Germans were selectively prosecuted.
Western Allies carried out operations like Operation Keelhaul and enforced the brutal Morgenthau Plan, leading to starvation and death among millions of civilians.
Yet none of these Allied crimes were brought to trial.
🧩 Flaws in Holocaust Evidence
Much of the Holocaust narrative presented at Nuremberg relied on coerced testimonies and inflated statistics.
Rudolf Höss, commandant of Auschwitz, allegedly confessed to 2.5 million deaths—but historians later admitted this number was false.
He wrote his “memoirs” while under KGB custody, subjected to brutal interrogation.
Some claims, such as mass killings at camps like Dachau, were later quietly dropped by historians.
💭 The Larger Question
If the foundation of Holocaust history rests on confessions obtained through torture, coerced testimony, and politically biased courts—how reliable is the official narrative?
⚖️ As Taft declared:
“Justice of the winner is never justice.”
Perhaps, the Nuremberg Trials tell us less about justice and more about power, propaganda, and the rewriting of history by the victors.
📚 Source:
JS Center – Holocaust Research (2): The Nuremberg Trials
👉 https://jscenter.ir/other-topics/holocaust/7797
#Nuremberg #Holocaust #History #Justice #Truth
✅ @rahyafte_en
اندیشکده مطالعات یهود | Jewish Studies Center
دادگاه نورنبرگ - اندیشکده مطالعات یهود | Jewish Studies Center
نخستین دیدگاه متفاوت درباره دادگاه نورنبرگ متعلق به شخصی بود که از نظر من دشمن اهالی جنوب آمریکا به شمار میرفت. رئیس جمهور جان اف کندی
Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
📆 Daily Calendar 🌺 Today: Wednesday 🌞 9 Mehr 1404 (Solar Hijri) ☪️ 8 Rabi‘ al-Thani 1447 (Lunar Hijri) ✝️ 1 October 2025 (Gregorian) 🕎 9 Tishrei 5786 (Hebrew) 🌍 Islamic Occasion ➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🌺 Birth Anniversary of Imam Hasan al-‘Askari (a.s.) (232 AH) 🌍 Gregorian…
🚨 Modern Purim in the Nuremberg Trials 🚨
📝 Based on Louis Marschalko’s The World Conquerors (Part V)
https://jscenter.ir/jewish-methods/jews-and-politics/18532
💡 The fifth part of Marschalko’s groundbreaking book exposes one of the darkest traditions of World Jewry: the festival of Purim.
While Purim is celebrated annually as a joyful holiday in Jewish communities worldwide, Marschalko uncovers its chilling roots: a massacre of 75,000 Persians orchestrated by Esther and Mordechai during the reign of Xerxes (Ahasuerus).
📖 In the Book of Esther, this genocide is narrated as a “victory” for the Jewish people. For over 2,500 years, Jews have preserved this tradition, celebrating the execution of innocents with wine, feasts, and revelry.
🔴 Purim as a Model for Modern Genocides
Marschalko argues that the spirit of Purim resurfaced in 1946, just one year after WWII, during the Nuremberg Trials.
Like Haman and his sons, who were executed through Esther’s schemes, German leaders—military men, doctors, intellectuals, and politicians—were condemned and executed in what Marschalko calls a “show trial”.
He writes that:
➡️ The Nuremberg executions were a modern Purim, a judicially cloaked act of vengeance.
➡️ Judges, witnesses, and staff were overwhelmingly Jewish, often concealing their identity.
➡️ Evidence was fabricated, testimonies coerced under torture, and cinematic tricks (e.g., Death Mills, 1945) were used to manipulate public opinion.
📌 Key Insights from Marschalko
1. Purim = Holocaust of Persians 👥
75,000 Persians were slaughtered in an ancient genocide.
Esther & Mordechai manipulated the Persian king through deception.
2. Political Lessons of Esther 🏛️
Mordechai established a model: infiltrating royal courts through marriage and influence, a tactic that echoes in modern political history.
3. Nuremberg as Purim 2.0 ⚖️
Just as Haman was falsely accused, German leaders were vilified.
The trials became a spectacle of vengeance, not justice.
Torture, fabricated evidence, and staged propaganda films reinforced the narrative.
4. A Festival of Hatred vs. a Festival of Love ✝️✡️
Purim, Marschalko says, is the “Feast of Hatred and Revenge.”
By contrast, Christianity’s greatest celebration, Christmas, commemorates the birth of Love and Mercy: Jesus Christ (AS).
📚 References & Notes
Louis Marschalko, The World Conquerors, Ch. 10 “The New Purim and Nuremberg.”
Shlomo Sand, The Invention of the Jewish People.
Eyewitness accounts of torture at Nuremberg (e.g., Julius Streicher, Oswald Pohl).
Critical testimony: Judge Charles F. Wennerstrum (Chicago Tribune, 1948).
🔥 Marschalko’s warning is clear: whenever World Jewry gains dominance, they repeat the same ancient pattern—celebrating victory not with peace, but with mass executions and fabricated trials.
✡️ Purim = Hatred and Blood
✝️ Christmas = Love and Redemption
📢 Stay awake. History repeats itself.
#Purim #Nuremberg #JewishPower #WorldPolitics #HiddenHistory
✅ @rahyafte_en
📝 Based on Louis Marschalko’s The World Conquerors (Part V)
https://jscenter.ir/jewish-methods/jews-and-politics/18532
💡 The fifth part of Marschalko’s groundbreaking book exposes one of the darkest traditions of World Jewry: the festival of Purim.
While Purim is celebrated annually as a joyful holiday in Jewish communities worldwide, Marschalko uncovers its chilling roots: a massacre of 75,000 Persians orchestrated by Esther and Mordechai during the reign of Xerxes (Ahasuerus).
📖 In the Book of Esther, this genocide is narrated as a “victory” for the Jewish people. For over 2,500 years, Jews have preserved this tradition, celebrating the execution of innocents with wine, feasts, and revelry.
🔴 Purim as a Model for Modern Genocides
Marschalko argues that the spirit of Purim resurfaced in 1946, just one year after WWII, during the Nuremberg Trials.
Like Haman and his sons, who were executed through Esther’s schemes, German leaders—military men, doctors, intellectuals, and politicians—were condemned and executed in what Marschalko calls a “show trial”.
He writes that:
➡️ The Nuremberg executions were a modern Purim, a judicially cloaked act of vengeance.
➡️ Judges, witnesses, and staff were overwhelmingly Jewish, often concealing their identity.
➡️ Evidence was fabricated, testimonies coerced under torture, and cinematic tricks (e.g., Death Mills, 1945) were used to manipulate public opinion.
📌 Key Insights from Marschalko
1. Purim = Holocaust of Persians 👥
75,000 Persians were slaughtered in an ancient genocide.
Esther & Mordechai manipulated the Persian king through deception.
2. Political Lessons of Esther 🏛️
Mordechai established a model: infiltrating royal courts through marriage and influence, a tactic that echoes in modern political history.
3. Nuremberg as Purim 2.0 ⚖️
Just as Haman was falsely accused, German leaders were vilified.
The trials became a spectacle of vengeance, not justice.
Torture, fabricated evidence, and staged propaganda films reinforced the narrative.
4. A Festival of Hatred vs. a Festival of Love ✝️✡️
Purim, Marschalko says, is the “Feast of Hatred and Revenge.”
By contrast, Christianity’s greatest celebration, Christmas, commemorates the birth of Love and Mercy: Jesus Christ (AS).
📚 References & Notes
Louis Marschalko, The World Conquerors, Ch. 10 “The New Purim and Nuremberg.”
Shlomo Sand, The Invention of the Jewish People.
Eyewitness accounts of torture at Nuremberg (e.g., Julius Streicher, Oswald Pohl).
Critical testimony: Judge Charles F. Wennerstrum (Chicago Tribune, 1948).
🔥 Marschalko’s warning is clear: whenever World Jewry gains dominance, they repeat the same ancient pattern—celebrating victory not with peace, but with mass executions and fabricated trials.
✡️ Purim = Hatred and Blood
✝️ Christmas = Love and Redemption
📢 Stay awake. History repeats itself.
#Purim #Nuremberg #JewishPower #WorldPolitics #HiddenHistory
✅ @rahyafte_en
Rahyafte (The Guided Ones)
📆 Yesterday’s Daily Calendar 🌺 Today: Thursday 🌞 24 Mehr 1404 (Solar Hijri) ☪️ 23 Rabi al-Thani 1447 (Lunar Hijri) ✝️ 16 October 2025 (Gregorian) 🕎 24 Tishrei 5786 (Hebrew) 🌍 Solar Calendar Events ✍️ Biological Assassination and Martyrdom of the Renowned…
📜 The Modern Purim: From Ancient Persia to the Nuremberg Trials
Source: jscenter.ir/jewish-methods/jews-and-politics/18532
#Purim #Nuremberg #LouisMarschalko #TheWorldConquerors
In the fifth part of “The World Conquerors”, Hungarian author Louis Marschalko exposes what he describes as the modern reincarnation of the Purim festival — the Nuremberg Trials of 1946.
Purim, the most celebrated Jewish festival, commemorates the alleged deliverance of the Jews from Haman, the Persian minister of King Ahasuerus (Xerxes I), as recorded in the Book of Esther. Yet, according to Marschalko, the essence of Purim is not liberation but revenge and bloodshed, recalling what he calls the “Holocaust of 75,000 Persians” engineered by Esther and Mordechai.
🕎 From Persia to Europe
Marschalko argues that the same spirit of vengeance reappeared two and a half millennia later — in Nuremberg, 1946, when Jewish influence allegedly shaped the post-war tribunals. He calls the Nuremberg executions the “New Purim”, symbolizing the triumph of what he terms “the World Jewish Government” over its ideological enemies.
⚖️ The Nuremberg “Spectacle”
In his view, the trials were a theatrical display of power rather than impartial justice. He claims that:
• The prosecution, witnesses, and investigators were overwhelmingly Jewish;
• Prisoners faced brutal torture and forced confessions;
• Fake evidence and cinematic propaganda — such as the film Death Mills — were used to manipulate global opinion;
• Executions of German officers mirrored the biblical hanging of Haman and his sons.
Marschalko quotes the American judge Charles F. Wennerstrum, who resigned in protest, stating that the Nuremberg proceedings were “dominated by those seeking vengeance rather than justice.”
🕊️ Between Cross and Sword
Contrasting Purim’s “festival of hatred and revenge” with Christianity’s “feast of love and mercy” — Christmas — Marschalko sees an eternal struggle between two spiritual worldviews:
📚 Conclusion
For Marschalko, the Nuremberg Purim marked not the end of war crimes, but the beginning of a new world order — one cloaked in the language of democracy, yet driven by ancient vengeance.
✅ @rahyafte_en
Source: jscenter.ir/jewish-methods/jews-and-politics/18532
#Purim #Nuremberg #LouisMarschalko #TheWorldConquerors
In the fifth part of “The World Conquerors”, Hungarian author Louis Marschalko exposes what he describes as the modern reincarnation of the Purim festival — the Nuremberg Trials of 1946.
Purim, the most celebrated Jewish festival, commemorates the alleged deliverance of the Jews from Haman, the Persian minister of King Ahasuerus (Xerxes I), as recorded in the Book of Esther. Yet, according to Marschalko, the essence of Purim is not liberation but revenge and bloodshed, recalling what he calls the “Holocaust of 75,000 Persians” engineered by Esther and Mordechai.
🕎 From Persia to Europe
Marschalko argues that the same spirit of vengeance reappeared two and a half millennia later — in Nuremberg, 1946, when Jewish influence allegedly shaped the post-war tribunals. He calls the Nuremberg executions the “New Purim”, symbolizing the triumph of what he terms “the World Jewish Government” over its ideological enemies.
⚖️ The Nuremberg “Spectacle”
In his view, the trials were a theatrical display of power rather than impartial justice. He claims that:
• The prosecution, witnesses, and investigators were overwhelmingly Jewish;
• Prisoners faced brutal torture and forced confessions;
• Fake evidence and cinematic propaganda — such as the film Death Mills — were used to manipulate global opinion;
• Executions of German officers mirrored the biblical hanging of Haman and his sons.
Marschalko quotes the American judge Charles F. Wennerstrum, who resigned in protest, stating that the Nuremberg proceedings were “dominated by those seeking vengeance rather than justice.”
🕊️ Between Cross and Sword
Contrasting Purim’s “festival of hatred and revenge” with Christianity’s “feast of love and mercy” — Christmas — Marschalko sees an eternal struggle between two spiritual worldviews:
“Wherever the Children of Mordechai rise to power,” he writes, “they celebrate victory not with peace, but with the gallows.”
📚 Conclusion
For Marschalko, the Nuremberg Purim marked not the end of war crimes, but the beginning of a new world order — one cloaked in the language of democracy, yet driven by ancient vengeance.
✅ @rahyafte_en
اندیشکده مطالعات یهود | Jewish Studies Center
نسخه مدرن پوریم در دادگاه نورنبرگ - اندیشکده مطالعات یهود | Jewish Studies Center
لوئیس مارشالکو کشتار دادگاه نورنبرگ را یک پوریم یهودی دیگر میداند که استر و مردخای بهراه انداخته و بهموجب آن ۷۵ هزار ایرانی را کشتند.