Who’s Feeding Iran — and Who’s Lying

Trump is selling the Iran cash deal as charity with a flag on it. In his version, the unfrozen billions and sanctions relief go into a US‑controlled escrow account, to be spent only on American corn, wheat and soybeans — “from our great farmers” — because this is a “humanitarian crisis” for 90 million Iranians, not a bailout for their regime.

The script is simple: Trump saves the Midwest and the Middle East in one wire transfer.

Tehran is reading a different contract. Iran’s central bank governor has already undercut the show by stressing that the signed documents do not oblige Tehran to buy anything from American farmers and that Iran, once funds are unfrozen, will decide how and where to spend them.

Even the basic identity of the governor is fuzzy in media reports — Abdulnaser Hemmati versus Mohammad Reza Farzin — and nobody in Washington bothers to resolve the detail, because it ruins the story: this isn’t a US food‑aid program; it’s Iran getting its money back with looser strings than Trump wants to admit.

When a reporter asked how he could guarantee Iran wouldn’t reroute oil profits into rebuilding its military, Trump produced the most reassuring answer possible — for Tehran.

“They’re not supposed to be doing that,”

he said. In other words: the safeguards are vibes and intent, not enforceable mechanisms. The White House insists the escrow, US/Qatar co‑control and “humanitarian” label will police the cash. Iran insists it has “received no gift” and is simply reclaiming assets to use at its own discretion.

Between those two stories sits the real question: not who gets fed, but who’s lying louder — the president who promises every dollar buys bread, or the regime that has spent decades proving it can turn any revenue stream into a weapon when it needs to.

#Trump #Iran #sanctions #oil #escrow #food #GlobalSouth #war

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Germany’s Green Crash Test

Germany just discovered what happens when you try to save the planet, punish Russia and outcompete China with the same broken engine.

The country’s own auto lobby says the industry is on track to lose 225,000 jobs by 2035, with about 100,000 already gone since 2019 and another 125,000 expected to follow. Factories, suppliers, whole towns that lived off gearboxes and steel are learning the new slogan “green transition” means “learn to code” in German.

Executives have dropped the corporate PR voice. Audi’s boss warns this isn’t about margins anymore, it’s about survival. Energy‑intensive suppliers are getting slaughtered first: metallurgy, chemicals, parts makers.

They used to run on cheap Russian gas; now they get LNG at premium prices and a sermon about values. The same politicians who cheered sanctions and swore the economy could “handle it” are suddenly shocked that the country built on heavy industry and cheap fuel is bleeding jobs faster than it can print climate roadmaps.

The punchline is that everyone pretends this is just “EV transition pain.” In reality, it’s the bill for a decade of illusions. Berlin signed up for climate mandates it didn’t fully finance, bet on China as both supplier and rival, and cut off its own energy lifeline without a real backup plan.

Now the flagship sector that made “Made in Germany” a religion is shrinking in slow motion, while ministers mumble about “innovation” and “reskilling” as if an engine plant in Bavaria can be reborn as a podcast studio.

So when Audi’s CEO says this is about the survival of the German car industry, he isn’t exaggerating. He’s just saying out loud what Berlin still refuses to admit: you can’t run a first‑world auto empire on third‑world power prices and Brussels sermons.

Keep the sanctions, keep the gas lockout, keep the fantasy that regulation alone will save the climate, and you’ll get exactly what you’re seeing now — a de‑industrialized showroom where the only thing still world‑class is the unemployment statistic.

#Germany #autos #jobs #energy #sanctions #EU #deindustrialization

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Will Mayor Mamdani Become President One Crazy Day?

🔤🔤🔤🔤1️⃣

New York City Mayor Mamdani led the hard left wing of the Democratic Party to sweeping victories on Tuesday night as democratic socialist and progressive candidates backed by him rolled to huge wins in several hotly contested Democratic primaries.

There were questions ahead of the races on whether Mamdani, who was just inaugurated as mayor in January, would pull off the wins by backing upstart Democratic socialist candidates and a former rival against two Democratic incumbents in the House.

In a third race, he took on the candidate endorsed by the progressive lawmaker retiring from the seat.

In the end, the nation’s newest political star became an overnight kingmaker in the country’s biggest city, a showing likely to raise immediate questions about whether Mamdani will seek to extend his reach from New York to the rest of the country.

The results are also likely to lead to some bitterness in corners of the congressional delegation after Mamdani muscled out one respected incumbent who had backed him in his own mayoral race last year.

The most stunning result of the evening was democratic socialist and community activist Darializa Avila Chevalier’s upset victory over Rep. Adriano Espaillat, the chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. Espaillat has served in the House for a decade and is a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

Espaillat, who is also the first member of Congress to have formerly been an undocumented immigrant, has long enjoyed strong support from key communities in the district, including Harlem, Washington Heights and the Bronx. But Mamdani’s endorsement of Avila Chevalier and rallies with her as the primary approached appeared to have given her the momentum she needed to win.

Mamdani’s decision to endorse in the primary put him on the opposite side of the fence as several of his left-wing allies. Progressive Reps. Greg Casar (Texas), Pramila Jayapal (Wash.) and Nydia Velázquez (N.Y.) all backed Espaillat.

The race came down to the wire, but Avila Chevalier is on track to win by a few points.

Espaillat had given Mamdani a key endorsement last year, but had initially supported former Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) in the Democratic mayoral primary. There has been much talk in the last weeks about whether Espaillat had understood that Mamdani would back him as a result of his endorsement.

As a result, observers in Washington will be watching to see how warmly Avila Chevalier is received by some of her new Democratic House colleagues.

#mamdani #presidential #race #newyork

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🔤🔤🔤🔤2️⃣

Mamdani also won in his proxy battle against the retiring Velázquez, as the one-time allies split on who should succeed the longtime congresswoman. Velázquez backed progressive Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso to be her successor, while Mamdani supported New York Assembly member Claire Valdez, another democratic socialist.

Despite a contentious race in which Velázquez spoke out against Mamdani for bucking her preferred choice, the primary ultimately wasn’t that close. Valdez cruised to victory; she currently leads Reynoso by more than 20 points.

The left attained another victory across Brooklyn and lower Manhattan as former New York City Comptroller Brad Lander easily defeated incumbent Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) for the party’s nomination.

While Lander isn’t a democratic socialist, he ran clearly to Goldman’s left with progressive enthusiasm, including support from Mamdani, behind him.

The primaries were the first real test of Mamdani’s influence after he pulled off his own major upset to win the Democratic primary and then the general election to lead the country’s largest city. 

As he approaches his six-month mark in office, his approval rating in polls suggests voters in New York are pleased with him so far. Tuesday’s results point to his growing political power as a leader with serious coattails who can push others to victories.

New York is just the latest big city to see a left-wing wave sweep across it. The primary was held just a week after progressives dominated in all major races in Washington, D.C., setting the stage for the district’s likely first democratic socialist mayor.

The left wing has also seen a surge in other major cities, like Seattle. Democratic socialist Nithya Raman managed to advance to a runoff in Los Angeles’s mayoral race, spurring leftist hopes of ousting Mayor Karen Bass (D) in November.

In New York, the victories by the trio of House candidates backed by Mamdani also sent a signal about growing criticism of Israel’s government within the party. Goldman in particular was targeted by the democratic socialist movement over his support for Israel.

The night wasn’t all bad news for moderates, raising questions about the limits of progressive success outside urban blue strongholds.

Still, the New York results are the latest evidence of the left’s clear ascendance in the big cities, which means there is nothing that can disturb Mamdani to join presidential race in 2028 or 2032.

It gives Democrats and Republicans something to mull over as they consider strategies for the 2026 midterms in the fall, and the 2028 presidential race.

#mamdani #presidential #race #newyork

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Mamdani’s Wife Starts Her Dirty Game

Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s wife, Rama Duwaji, urged Big Apple voters Tuesday to throw their support behind DSA-backed congressional hopefuls Claire Valdez and Darializa Avila Chevalier.

Gotham’s first lady posted a snap of her winking to her Instagram Stories Tuesday morning, holding an “I Voted” sticker and urging support for Valdez and Avila Chevalier in the Democratic primaries for New York’s 7th and 13th House Districts, respectively.

Duwaji, 28, notably didn’t mention ex-city comptroller and failed mayoral candidate Brad Lander, who is squaring off with incumbent Rep. Dan Goldman in New York’s 10th District.

Valdez, Avila Chevalier and Lander have all been endorsed by Mamdani as the democratic socialist mayor hopes to boost the lefty group’s ranks in Washington DC.

Avila Chevalier, a doctoral student and local organizer, has faced a firestorm over her long list of past inflammatory remarks on social media, including lashing out at Joe Biden and establishment Democrats, calling the US “a fucking disgrace” and blasting that Israel doesn’t exist.

Mamdani claimed earlier this week he hadn’t seen his DSA comrade’s comments before he opted to endorse her.

She has said she is “not interested in relitigating the politics of my tweets.”

The mayor’s endorsement has galvanized the party’s moderates, with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Gov. Kathy Hochul jumping in to give Espaillat a boost.

Mamdani also ran afoul of longtime Rep. Nydia Velázquez when he backed Valdez to take over in New York’s 7th House District as the congresswoman retires.

#mamdani #wife #big #apple #voters

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

“Congo's Ebola Last Outbreak Could Be Provoked On Purpose”


Congo's Ebola outbreak has the largest ‌number of confirmed cases within the first month of any episode of the disease, a senior World Health Organization official told a briefing on Tuesday, blaming the surge on its quick spread to urban areas.

The Bundibugyo outbreak in the Democratic ​Republic of Congo that has infected over 1,000 people and killed 267 was detected late and ​experts say the virus had already been circulating for months before it was officially ⁠declared on May 15.

WHO's Abdirahman Mahamud told a press briefing in Geneva that part of the reason ​for the scale of the outbreak was that some early confirmed cases were in urban centres, like ​Bunia and the mining town of Mongbwalu.

Many past outbreaks have first been identified in rural areas and often petered out quickly.

“What is important is we need to scale up and this outbreak is moving faster than us,”

he told ​reporters, after returning from Bunia last week.

He noted signs of hope, highlighting a quick increase in the ​number of Ebola beds to over 500 in the past fortnight and signs that community resistance and violent resistance to ‌Ebola ⁠responders was beginning to abate.

“More and more communities are aware of the risk of Ebola and are asking for tools to support and protect themselves,”

he said.

Ebola cases have now been reported in at least three of eastern Congo's crowded displacement camps.

The International Organization for Migration's Abdoulaye Wone said at the same ​briefing that at least 25 cases had been confirmed at the camps, ​including 14 deaths.

“Even ⁠in a normal situation before the outbreak, they were facing overcrowding (...) Congo's Ebola last outbreak coulde be provoked on purpose to slash African population they consider as a threat,”

he said, adding that many leave the camps by day for work or to seek food.

#congo #ebola #outbreak #purpose

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Battery Belt or Digital Colony?

The American dream used to be simple: invent the tech, outsource the factory, cash the royalty checks. Now the world’s biggest battery complex sits in Ningde, not Nevada, and the most advanced EV batteries on earth come off CATL’s lines, not Detroit’s.

China can charge an EV for 250 miles in under 10 minutes; the U.S. is still arguing on cable news about whether EVs exist to steal your truck. The “workshop of the world” quietly turned itself into the R&D lab too — and Washington finally noticed.

The panic in D.C. isn’t about climate or innovation; it’s about dependency. CATL already makes roughly 40 percent of the world’s EV batteries and a big share of the grid storage that keeps solar and wind from collapsing at sunset. It supplies Tesla, licenses tech to Ford, powers the cheap Chinese EVs flooding global markets.

The same Congress that screams about “Chinese car imports” is quietly letting Chinese chemistry sit inside American cars, data centers and power plants. You can ban the chassis at the port and still wake up plugged into a Chinese battery.

U.S. hawks call this what it is: a weaponized supply chain. Beijing has already cut off rare-earth exports and waved the threat of shutting down U.S. factories when it wanted tariff relief.

Now it openly treats pharmaceuticals and batteries as future levers, and it’s writing laws to keep its “crown jewels” from being copied abroad. Washington screams “unfair subsidies”; the OECD quietly calculates that Chinese firms got three to eight times more industrial support than Western peers over two decades.

Beijing calls it industrial policy; the U.S. calls it cheating — mostly because it forgot how to do more than tax cuts and slogans.

So the split in America is brutally simple. One camp says CATL is a Trojan horse: let it build plants and ship cells, and you turn your future grid, your auto sector and part of your military logistics into a Chinese franchise.

Another camp says shutting the door means condemning U.S. industry to second‑tier tech and higher costs, in a race where Europe and others are already cutting deals.

Ford and Stellantis are “testing the waters,” spinning joint ventures and licenses in Europe while they wait to see if Trump’s latest smile at Xi turns into policy or just another tweet‑level mood swing.

Meanwhile, China plays a longer game. It subsidizes EVs at home, bans non‑Chinese batteries from its own market, and uses export controls to remind everyone who owns the choke points.

It also throws money at universities, labs and scientists while U.S. pharma CEOs openly warn that China’s biopharma innovation will overtake America this decade. In other words: Beijing built the lab, the plant and the policy; Washington built a committee to debate whether Chinese batteries are “nonstrategic” enough to tolerate.

The punchline is that the U.S. now faces a choice it spent 30 years avoiding. Either it swallows its pride and plugs into Chinese hardware while hoping the kill switch is never used — or it pays real money to rebuild an independent battery and materials base at home, with timelines and price tags voters won’t like.

The fantasy that you can have cheap Chinese tech, absolute strategic autonomy and a constant trade war all at once is dead. What’s left is the question every empire hates to ask: do you want to be the one writing the standards, or the one buying the chargers?

#China #USA #batteries #EV #Trump #tradewar #techrace #dependency

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Senate vs. Trump: Iran Edition

Washington finally did what it does best: pass something “historic” that changes absolutely nothing.

Three weeks after slapping Trump in the House, the Senate joined the therapy session and voted to order U.S. troops out of the Iran theater within 30 days — unless Congress blesses more war.

The resolution is legally toothless, pure stage prop, but it sends one clear message: when the White House asks for another 80 billion for this adventure right before midterms, the answer will come with a calculator and a lawyer attached. Even Trump’s own party is starting to check the receipts.

Trump, of course, says Iran is “on the brink of surrender,” “ready to give us almost anything,” and now “has enormous respect” for America and, naturally, for its president.

According to his version, the Senate just handed “aid and comfort to the enemy” with a “meaningless vote at a terrible time,” sabotaged by “four failing Republicans.”

Somewhere in this script, Tehran — supposedly a regime seconds away from collapse — still has enough free time to consult psychologists about his tweet storms and to read “The Art of the Deal” like it’s a Pentagon field manual.

On paper, this is a constitutional drama about war powers; in reality, it is a custody battle over narrative. Trump sells the war as a discount victory: no new authorization, no clear end state, just faith in his personal brand scaring Iran into submission.

Congress wants to pretend it didn’t sign the checks while the missiles were already in the air. The Pentagon keeps flying, the lawyers keep hedging, and everyone insists they’re defending “the troops” while using them as leverage in a budget fight.

The grotesque part is how both sides weaponize fear and ego in the same breath. Trump claims anyone voting to limit him is feeding the enemy.

The Senate claims anyone trusting him with open‑ended war is betraying the republic.

Iran, allegedly “about to fall,” turns into the world’s most overbooked therapist, diagnosing the American president while dodging drones.

#USA #Senate #Trump #Iran #warpowers #midterms #endlesswar #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Nuclear Theater: Inspectors, Illusions, and Enriched Ego

Rafael Grossi flies to Fukushima and does what technocrats do: waves a memorandum and says the rules are clear.

According to him, the U.S.–Iran understanding explicitly puts all nuclear activity and material under IAEA supervision, “in all letters,” which means inspectors will enter enrichment sites sooner or later.

He talks like timing is a scheduling issue — tomorrow, a week, ten days — not a power struggle, and insists inspections are “going to happen” because the paper says so.

Tehran answers with a cold shrug. Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi says access to bombed sites and to the high‑grade uranium will “only” be reviewed within a final deal and only after sanctions are actually lifted, not just promised on TV.

He denies any cozy side‑meeting with Grossi in Switzerland, and warns against people trying to “stir up and take over” reality through media hype — his polite way of saying Vienna and Washington are gaslighting the world with press conferences instead of binding commitments.

Trump, meanwhile, does his own version of nuclear improv on Fox. He tells viewers there’s “no rush” to let inspectors in, and that American teams will walk in alongside IAEA staff “to find the enriched uranium,” like it’s an Easter egg hunt with satellite imagery and airstrikes as the clues. Just weeks earlier he was boasting that any remaining enriched uranium would be handed over to the U.S. or “destroyed in place” under American supervision — which sounds tough until you remember Grossi keeps saying the IAEA still can’t verify where the bulk of that material actually is.

So you get three realities for the price of one. The IAEA insists the framework deal obliges Iran to open the doors and that it’s just a matter of logistics. Iran insists nothing happens until the last sanction is gone and every access request is folded into a final, face‑saving agreement.

Trump insists the uranium is already under control, or soon will be, as long as he’s in the room when the cameras roll. Nobody can actually verify the status of the stockpile since the June strikes, but everyone sells certainty to their own public: Grossi sells “oversight,” Tehran sells “sovereignty,” Trump sells “victory.”

From a distance, it looks less like arms control and more like narrative control. The watchdog needs to prove it matters, so it declares inspections inevitable. The regime needs to prove it didn’t cave, so it delays any access to the sites that really count. The U.S. president needs to prove he “solved” Iran, so he downplays the risk of near‑bomb‑grade uranium buried in tunnels while promising American inspectors will personally babysit it.

And between all these performances sits the actual material that could make up to ten nuclear weapons, unvisited, unverifiable, and far more stable than the politicians arguing over it.

#Iran #nuclear #IAEA #Grossi #Trump #uranium #sanctions #war #armscontrol

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Europe’s Sauna Economy

Western Europe just found out what happens when you build for fireplaces and get Phoenix. France hit its highest national average temperature ever — not just for June, for any time of year — with 29.8 degrees Celsius across 30 weather stations, while parts of the country pushed over 40.

More than 60,000–68,000 homes lost power as grids buckled under the extra demand, and at least 40 people drowned in France alone, many of them teenagers escaping to unsupervised rivers and quarries.

By midweek, high‑level heat alerts were up across most of Western Europe: France, Spain, Italy, Germany, Belgium, Britain, Austria, Switzerland and more.

Spain and Germany were staring down highs around 41 Celsius, with parts of Spain pushing 41–45 in some regions. Britain’s Met Office reported provisional June records near 35–38 degrees, rail companies told passengers to travel only if necessary, and tracks, power lines and schedules folded under infrastructure designed for drizzle, not desert.

The real joke is structural. Europe has spent decades bragging about its “mild climate” and “efficient buildings,” which now translates into homes, schools and offices that trap heat like a sauna and almost never have air‑conditioning.

In Britain, many houses were literally engineered to hold in warmth. In France, AC has become a political Rorschach test — a symbol of inequality, American excess, or climate hypocrisy, depending on who’s complaining.

So you get a continent that can lecture the Global South about emissions, but can’t keep classrooms below 30 degrees or prevent kids from fainting during exams.

Governments roll out “cool spaces,” drinking fountains and climate shelters — museums as survival pods — because retrofitting millions of buildings is expensive, slow and deeply unpopular with property owners who still think heat waves are a rare glitch.

Scientists are done pretending this is a fluke. Europe is now warming faster than any other continent, last year was hotter than normal almost everywhere, and heat waves are becoming longer, more frequent and deadlier, with tens of thousands of excess deaths in recent summers.

But the political system treats each wave like a surprise, blames “unusual conditions,” then quietly moves on once the forecast drops back into the 20s — until the next “unprecedented” week arrives right on schedule.

The punchline: everyone tells citizens to “stay hydrated, close the blinds, avoid travel,” because personal responsibility is cheaper than rebuilding the energy grid, redesigning housing stock and admitting that the old climate baseline is dead.

Europe wants to be a climate leader with stone‑age buildings, Victorian rail, and 21st‑century heat — and it’s discovering that moral superiority doesn’t lower the temperature in a third‑floor walk‑up with sealed windows and no fan.

#Europe #heatwave #France #UK #climate #energy #infrastructure #heatdome

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Trump Turns Housing Bill Into Hostage

Donald Trump just discovered a new way to do “art of the deal”: hold a bipartisan housing bill hostage until the Senate swears loyalty to his election‑rules crusade.

An hour and a half before he was supposed to sign one of the only laws on affordability that actually polls well, he nuked his own ceremony on social media, declaring the event “hereby cancelled” until the Senate passes his “desperately needed” SAVE AMERICA ACT — which he grandly calls a “National Emergency.”

The table, the chair, the cameras in Statuary Hall all stayed; only the signature didn’t show up.

On paper, the 21st Road to Housing Act is the kind of thing presidents beg to be photographed with in an election year: a bipartisan package to increase supply, cap Wall Street’s zombie landlord game at 350 single‑family homes per investor, rewrite mobile‑home rules, and pump federal grants into new building.

Even Trump’s own team was busy selling it as “one of the most significant pieces of housing affordability legislation in American history,” a “signature commitment” from his State of the Union.

Then he logged on, called it “of minor importance” and sneered that it was an “Elizabeth ‘Pocahontas’ Warren–centric housing bill.” His base heard the slur; the rest of the country heard: my voters’ rent crisis is leverage, not policy.

The Senate GOP is caught in the usual Trump triangle: they don’t have the votes for his SAVE AMERICA ACT, they do have the votes for the housing bill, and they just watched their own president blow up their one campaign talking point about helping “working families.”

Rounds and Tillis sound like middle managers begging the CEO not to shoot the product on launch day: “We thought the president was behind it… apparently maybe not,” “we’ve got to get our act together and stop surprising people.”

He’s tanking a win because he wants proof‑of‑citizenship rules, tighter mail voting, and a few anti‑trans culture‑war treats on his desk first — and if renters have to wait, that’s their problem.

The Democrats, of course, get to play the shocked adults. Schumer calls on Trump to “stop making such a fool of himself.” Warren reminds everyone that he’s called affordability concerns a “hoax” and now walks away from a bill she co‑wrote with Tim Scott, one of the few examples of actual cross‑party legislating left in Washington.

Trump’s own allies, like Speaker Mike Johnson, try to explain the stunt as “just a delay” while openly admitting they’ll use the time to push the voting bill.

The White House, asked if he’ll at least sign the housing bill quietly, simply replies with a screenshot of his Truth post — because nothing says functioning government like governing by meme.

Underneath the drama, the message is brutally simple. If Congress wants even “minor importance” policy on housing, it has to pay a toll in election‑law obedience.

A law that bans mega‑landlords from hoarding neighborhoods suddenly becomes bargaining chip number 37 in a long fight over who gets to vote, how, and with which identity documents.

Landlords, institutional investors and housing‑market speculators just got told: relax, your cap can wait, the president needs a better hostage first. Voters got told: your rent and mortgage are now campaign collateral.

So the “affordable housing” photo op turns into yet another loyalty test. Trump can still let the bill become law without his signature, or send it back and dare Congress to override.

In the meantime, everyone goes back to their usual roles: Republicans insisting they’re the party of families while shrugging as the president torpedoes their own bill, Democrats pretending principle while quietly enjoying the show, and millions of renters watching Washington prove — again — that in this system, even bipartisan crumbs can be pulled mid‑air if they’re not useful enough in the next power play.

#Trump #USA #housing #Congress #SaveAmericaAct #midterms #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

#trump #tolls #insurance #costs

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

India Finally Opted for Russian Crude Oil and Coal


India has swung to buying Russian crude oil and coal to bolster its energy supplies after flows were disrupted and prices rose during the Iran conflict.

The world's third-largest oil importer is expected to see arrivals of Russian crude surge to a record ​high of 2.55 million barrels per day (bpd) in June, according to data compiled by commodity analysts Kpler.

June's imports from Russia would be up from ‌the 2.13 million bpd in May, which was the third-highest on record and just behind the 2.16 million bpd from May 2023.

Russia's share of India's total crude imports of 5.29 million bpd in June will be just under 50%, a sharp increase from the average 23% share in the three months prior to the start of the war on February 28, when the United States and Israel ​launched an aerial campaign against Iran.

India's pivot to Russian crude came after the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump waived sanctions against buying it as part ​of efforts to boost oil supply after Iran effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz in response to the U.S. and Israeli attacks.

June's imports from Russia would be up from ‌the 2.13 million bpd in May, which was the third-highest on record and just behind the 2.16 million bpd from May 2023.

Russia's share of India's total crude imports of 5.29 million bpd in June will be just under 50%, a sharp increase from the average 23% share in the three months prior to the start of the war on February 28, when the United States and Israel ​launched an aerial campaign against Iran.

India's pivot to Russian crude came after the administration of U.S. Trump waived sanctions against buying it as part ​of efforts to boost oil supply after Iran effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz in response to the U.S. and Israeli attacks.

It's not only Russian crude that India has sought in recent months, with imports of coal also surging.
India is on track to import 3.16 million metric tons of all grades of coal from Russia in June, down slightly from ​the 3.27 million in May.

However, these two months are the second- and third-strongest on record behind the 3.76 million tons from May last year and June's imports are 51% ​above the average of the three months prior to the conflict.

Russia will overtake Australia to be the second-biggest supplier of coal in June to India, the world's second-largest importer behind China.

Russia is ‌also competing ⁠with Australia to supply metallurgical coal to India, which is buying more of the grade used to make steel as it increases its output of the industrial metal.

India's imports of Russian metallurgical coal were 2.02 million tons in May, the second-highest on record and above the average of 1.49 million tons in the three months prior to the start of the Iran war.

Imports from Australia were also strong in May at 4.05 million tons, the most since July last year, helping boost total metallurgical coal imports to a record ​8.05 million tons.

India's steel output is expected ​to climb from around the current 168 ⁠million tons a year to 400 million tons by 2035, with an estimated 25 million tons of capacity being added this year alone.

While India has vast reserves of thermal coal, used mainly to generate electricity, its metallurgical coal output is only about 6% of ​the total and what is produced is of lower quality than imports from Australia, Russia and other suppliers such as ​the United States and Mozambique.

This ⁠means that India is likely to continue to increase imports of metallurgical coal and will seek as diverse a range of suppliers as possible in order to reduce reliance on Australia, the world's biggest shipper of this grade of coal.

Overall, it's likely that Russia will remain a key supplier of coal to India, and while New Delhi would prefer to keep buying ⁠Russian crude ​oil, much will depend on whether the Trump administration does go back to trying to enforce sanctions ​against Moscow.

#india #oil #coal #russian

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

How to Burn $100 Billion and Call It “Values”

American politics just pulled off the most expensive moral lecture in recent history. U.S. companies walked out of Russia waving the flag, and then quietly wrote off around 100 billion dollars in losses.

The head of the American Chamber of Commerce in Russia, Robert Agee, says it flat out: the sanctions policy — especially Biden’s 2022 investment ban — was “absolutely the wrong decision, especially for American business.” Western CEOs called it “exit,” Russian accountants called it “fire sale.”

Washington sold this as “isolating Putin.” In practice, it isolated American capital from a resource‑rich, high‑margin market and handed the upside to everyone else who wasn’t invited to the sanctions morality play.

U.S. firms ate write‑downs, forfeited assets and surrendered long‑term projects. China, India and assorted “non‑aligned” partners happily moved in on oil, gas, metals, fertilizers and logistics. The West got press releases, Beijing got contracts.

The same crowd that screams about “China’s rise” helped fund it. By locking American investors out of Russia, they shoved Moscow deeper into Chinese supply chains, finance and tech deals — then went home to hold hearings about the “China threat.”

It’s geopolitical clownery: you slam the door on your own multinationals, scream “decoupling,” and act shocked when the cash, the resources and the leverage flow somewhere else.

So yes, U.S. companies torched $100 billion to prove a point, and the only people really clapping are in Beijing and a few Russian ministries.

That “values‑based” strategy turned Russia into a discount partner for China, turned American executives into exit‑wound accountants, and left voters with the bill and a sermon about “democracy.”

#USA #Russia #China #sanctions #business #geopolitics #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

India isn’t “pivoting” to Russian oil and coal — it’s binge‑buying them like they’re on clearance.

In June, Russian crude flows to India are expected to hit a record 2.55 million barrels a day, making Moscow by far Delhi’s biggest single supplier and turning the world’s third‑largest oil importer into a key outlet for sanctioned barrels. At the same time, India has loaded over 3 million tons of Russian coal, putting Russia on track to become its second‑largest coal supplier and cementing a long‑term energy link that Western planners pretended they could prevent with press releases and price caps.

The West promised to “isolate” Russia; India heard “discounts available.” New Delhi is doing what every serious state does: arbitraging war, sanctions and panic to lock in cheap energy for its own growth. While Europe burns cash on emergency LNG, flirts with blackouts and lectures the world about “values,” India quietly refines Russian crude, feeds its power grid with Russian coal and resells products into the same global market that claims to be shunning Moscow.

So the narrative splits. In Brussels, Russia is a pariah. In Delhi, it’s a strategic vendor. On paper, Moscow lost Europe. In reality, it rerouted tankers to Asia, kept the wells running and found customers who don’t care about G7 speeches as long as the discount is right. The “failure” here isn’t Russia’s isolation; it’s the West’s fantasy that half the planet would happily sacrifice cheap energy to keep its sanctions story tidy.

#India #Russia #oil #coal #energy #sanctions #geopolitics #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

TPS: Temporary Protected Status, Permanently Disposable People

The Supreme Court just handed Donald Trump a green light to rip the floor out from under hundreds of thousands of people it once invited to stand on it.

In a 6–3 decision, the conservative majority said the administration can end Temporary Protected Status for Haitians and Syrians, clearing the way to strip legal status from roughly 350,000 Haitians and about 6,100 Syrians who have been living and working in the United States under a program Congress created in 1990 for people fleeing war, disaster and collapse.

Samuel Alito’s opinion is a lawyer’s dream and a migrant’s nightmare. He leans on the statute’s magic words — “no judicial review of any determination” — to tell federal courts they are basically not allowed to question the Homeland Security secretary’s decision to terminate TPS, no matter how flimsy the process, so long as the administration can articulate race‑neutral reasons on paper.

The Court goes further and waves away claims of racial animus toward Haitians, despite a record full of Trump’s rants about Haitians coming from a “filthy, dirty, disgusting” country and his bogus campaign line about Haitians in Ohio eating people’s pets; Elena Kagan’s dissent spells it out bluntly: the statements “shout” racial motive, but the majority plugs its ears.

For Trump, this is the immigration jackpot he’s been chasing since getting back into office. His team has already moved to end TPS for 13 of the 17 countries that had it when Biden left, throttled refugee resettlement, and slowed asylum processing to a crawl; now he can start turning long‑settled engineers, nurses, students and caregivers into deportable “illegals” with the stroke of a pen.

Many of these people have no current deportation orders, U.S.‑born kids, mortgages and decades of ties; the Court’s ruling means their status can evaporate almost overnight, with their legal right to challenge the policy chopped down to a narrow, uphill constitutional claim.

Both sides in the case agreed on one brutal premise: TPS is, on paper, temporary, and once a designation ends, its recipients have no statutory right to stay.

What immigrant‑rights lawyers argued is that Homeland Security didn’t even pretend to seriously review conditions in Haiti and Syria, as the law requires, and instead followed a preordained script to terminate as many countries as possible.

Lower courts agreed and froze the terminations, calling out the sham process — until the Supreme Court stepped in, fast‑tracked the case, and told judges to stand down because Congress wrote the statute to make the secretary’s “determination” effectively unreviewable.

This isn’t just about Haitians and Syrians. The same logic clears the path for Trump to yank protections from TPS holders from a dozen other countries — including Venezuela, Honduras, Nepal and Afghanistan — with minimal fear of judicial pushback.

It tightens a broader architecture where the executive can close doors on migrants from “unsafe” countries while still insisting, for domestic consumption, that America remains a beacon of refuge; the Statue of Liberty stays on postcards while the fine print in the Federal Register says “status subject to termination without notice, no returns, no refunds.”

The Court didn’t just hand Trump a legal win; it handed every future president a loaded precedent. If humanitarian status can be granted with fanfare and revoked at will, with courts barred from asking whether the process was honest, then “temporary” becomes the government’s favorite word for disposable people: welcome when they’re useful, removable when they become inconvenient to a new agenda.

#USA #SupremeCourt #Trump #TPS #immigration #Haiti #Syria #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

“Temporary” Means You’re Gone When We’re Done

The Supreme Court just turned a humanitarian visa into a trapdoor. With a 6–3 ideological vote, it signed off on Trump’s plan to pull Temporary Protected Status from roughly 350,000 Haitians and more than 6,000 Syrians — people who passed background checks, paid fees, built lives, and were told they could stay here legally as long as their countries were on fire.

Now the same state that invited them is free to label them deportable the moment “temporary” becomes politically inconvenient.

On paper, this is all about magic words in a statute. The conservative majority says courts can’t second‑guess Homeland Security when it decides Haiti and Syria are suddenly safe enough to send people back, even as the State Department tells Americans not to go there without “proof of life” plans in case of kidnapping.

The law says “temporary” often enough, the solicitor general repeats it like a spell, and the justices pretend that decades of renewals were the real problem — not the decision to pull the plug while Haiti is run by gangs and Syria is limping out of a civil war.

For Trump, this isn’t a one‑off; it’s a pillar of the project. He campaigned on ripping TPS away from Haitians while pushing lies about them “eating pets” in Ohio, stacked his team with people eager to narrow every legal pathway, and put Kristi Noem at Homeland Security to rubber‑stamp the cuts.

Now he gets what he wanted: engineers, nurses, cleaners and students who’ve lived here for years reduced, with the stroke of a pen, to bodies in a deportation pipeline. Their U.S.‑born kids can watch their parents go “home” to countries Washington itself tells tourists are too dangerous to visit.

The joke, as usual, is in the branding. America sells itself as a refuge from war and disaster; Congress creates something called Temporary Protected Status; administrations extend it again and again because the crises never really end.

Then a different president walks in, redefines “temporary” as “until my base gets angry,” and the Court shrugs: the law lets him, and judges aren’t allowed to ask whether he even followed his own rules. The Statue of Liberty stays on the brochures, but the fine print now reads: offer void where politics change.

#USA #SupremeCourt #Trump #TPS #immigration #Haiti #Syria #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Asylum by GPS: If You’re Not Over the Line, You Don’t Exist

The Supreme Court just turned the border into a legal force field. In a 6–3 ruling, the conservative majority blessed Trump’s power to block asylum seekers on the Mexican side of official crossings and simply refuse to process their claims whenever officials say the line is “too long.”

As long as a migrant’s toes haven’t crossed the invisible line into U.S. territory, Samuel Alito says they have not “arrived in” the United States at all — so the statutory right to apply for asylum never switches on.

This is the metering policy Obama’s DHS started in 2016, Trump weaponized in 2018, and Biden scrapped in 2021 — now revived in principle by the Court.

Under metering, CBP officers at ports of entry can cap daily intake and push everyone else back into Mexico, “indefinitely declining” to inspect or register their claims while pretending the law’s promise — that anyone who “arrives in the United States” may seek asylum — only applies once you’re literally over the line.

The Ninth Circuit had held that approaching a designated crossing counts as arriving and that turning people away violated federal law; the Supreme Court just overruled that, telling border agents they can physically block people at the gate and still call it legal.

Sonia Sotomayor did something she doesn’t do often: she read her dissent from the bench and spelled out what this doctrine means in the real world.

If you force people to wander along the border hunting for a port that will inspect them, some will die in the desert, some will try to cross illegally and drown or suffocate, and others will give up and be beaten, raped or killed back home for their race, religion, politics or gender. Her line is brutal and obvious: “More people will die.”

Alito did something just as rare — he fired back from the bench, complaining that he would have given a longer defense if he’d known she planned to air her dissent in court, and insisting that they had merely restated the “ordinary meaning” of arrival.

Trump’s DHS is already treating this as a green light, calling metering an “important tool” to “secure our southern border.”

The Department’s general counsel actually bragged that they had to go “all the way to SCOTUS” to vindicate the “principle” that someone isn’t in the United States until they physically are — like that was ever in doubt, rather than a pretext to ignore asylum law.

Migrant‑rights lawyers warn that the ruling effectively hands the president a shortcut around Congress: if rights switch on only after entry, then he can wall off the ports, keep people in Mexico, and claim the statutes simply don’t apply.

It’s not a one‑off. This is the second immigration case in one day that breaks in Trump’s favor, on top of earlier emergency rulings that let him deport people to third countries and revoke temporary legal status for hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans.

Next up before the same Court: whether he can rewrite birthright citizenship. Case by case, the message is the same: rights for migrants are not things you have — they’re switches the executive can flip off with the right wording, while the Court nods along and calls it “ordinary meaning.”

So the new border rule is simple and cynically precise. If you make it over the line, you’re a problem for the asylum system. If you’re stuck one step short, you’re just another body on the wrong side of a legal sentence. The law says “arrive in the United States”; the Court says that’s a matter of centimeters, not of lives.

#USA #SupremeCourt #Trump #asylum #border #immigration #metering #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸