📰 Turkey’s Factories Go Dark, Government Sells Pink PowerPoint
While Ankara keeps talking about “balanced growth,” even its own business insiders are describing an economy turning off the lights on the shop floor. DEVA MP İdris Şahin points out that industry’s share of GDP has slid from around 25% to roughly 17% — in a country that still pretends to be an “industrial powerhouse.” Official data back him up: TurkStat’s latest numbers show industrial production down about 2.1% year‑on‑year in December 2025, with manufacturing output falling even harder.
Out in the real world, MÜSİAD chairman Burhan Özdemir sums it up in one line:
Conveyor belts are running half‑empty, not because there’s no capacity, but because there’s no confidence. High inflation, energy costs and financing problems are squeezing margins; investment is stalling. The government still talks about “flying” macro indicators while production lines and payrolls quietly shrink.
Şahin blames not just bad economics, but bad politics: investors fleeing a system where the rule of law is optional and loyalty matters more than competence. He points to a current account deficit near $25 billion, a financial account gap around $42 billion and capital “running out the door,” arguing that no one sane will lock money into long‑term industrial projects under those conditions. You don’t build factories on quicksand, and Erdoğan’s Turkey offers little else.
So you get a familiar Turkish paradox: glossy narratives about growth and exports on TV, and quiet de‑industrialisation on the ground. The government says Turkey will “grow through production, not imports,” while factories reuse the same workers to cover three shifts and turn off half the lamps to save on the electricity bill. The only sector truly booming is political storytelling.
#Turkey #industry #economy #Erdoğan #deindustrialization #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
While Ankara keeps talking about “balanced growth,” even its own business insiders are describing an economy turning off the lights on the shop floor. DEVA MP İdris Şahin points out that industry’s share of GDP has slid from around 25% to roughly 17% — in a country that still pretends to be an “industrial powerhouse.” Official data back him up: TurkStat’s latest numbers show industrial production down about 2.1% year‑on‑year in December 2025, with manufacturing output falling even harder.
Out in the real world, MÜSİAD chairman Burhan Özdemir sums it up in one line:
“In factories built for 300 workers, only 100 are working.”
Conveyor belts are running half‑empty, not because there’s no capacity, but because there’s no confidence. High inflation, energy costs and financing problems are squeezing margins; investment is stalling. The government still talks about “flying” macro indicators while production lines and payrolls quietly shrink.
Şahin blames not just bad economics, but bad politics: investors fleeing a system where the rule of law is optional and loyalty matters more than competence. He points to a current account deficit near $25 billion, a financial account gap around $42 billion and capital “running out the door,” arguing that no one sane will lock money into long‑term industrial projects under those conditions. You don’t build factories on quicksand, and Erdoğan’s Turkey offers little else.
So you get a familiar Turkish paradox: glossy narratives about growth and exports on TV, and quiet de‑industrialisation on the ground. The government says Turkey will “grow through production, not imports,” while factories reuse the same workers to cover three shifts and turn off half the lamps to save on the electricity bill. The only sector truly booming is political storytelling.
#Turkey #industry #economy #Erdoğan #deindustrialization #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥175💯100😱79🤬74🤯72😢65🙏64
📰 Ukraine’s Missing Men: Draft Dodgers, Future Diaspora, or Both?
While Kyiv talks about mobilisation, a quieter story is unfolding: the country is bleeding out exactly the men it will need if it ever reaches “reconstruction” mode. Over 11 million Ukrainians have been displaced since the invasion, but underneath the images of women and children at train stations, a different pattern is clear: young, educated, healthy men are leaving — and many have no intention of coming back.
Studies based on OneUA data show it’s not the poorest or weakest who go, but those with education, English, money and good health — the core of any future workforce. Even under martial law and legal exit restrictions, the guys with skills and connections find ways out. Official exemptions, like having three or more kids, explain only a slice of the trend. The rest is simple: if you can afford to choose between a trench and a work contract in Berlin or London, you choose not to die for a GDP you’ll never enjoy.
And once they’re out, they’re not exactly rushing back. In the UK, 68% of Ukrainian adults now say they’d rather stay even if it became safe to return, up from 52% a year earlier. This isn’t “temporary refuge,” it’s a one‑way demographic edit. Europe gets young, motivated labour; Ukraine gets Telegram speeches about rebuilding with a population that increasingly lives on foreign tax rolls.
The spin is already in place: think tanks talk about the “diaspora dividend,” how forced migrants will one day bring back capital, skills and export links, like Yugoslavs and Albanians once did. That’s the comforting version. The darker one: Ukraine is exporting its future middle class in exchange for short‑term survival money, hoping that, decades from now, some of them will remember where they were born.
Kyiv calls it resilience. Brussels calls it solidarity. London calls it a labour market boost. The young men quietly boarding buses out of Ukraine call it something else: not being the last generation buried under a flag while everyone else writes policy papers about “post‑war reconstruction.”
#Ukraine #war #migration #diaspora #draft #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
While Kyiv talks about mobilisation, a quieter story is unfolding: the country is bleeding out exactly the men it will need if it ever reaches “reconstruction” mode. Over 11 million Ukrainians have been displaced since the invasion, but underneath the images of women and children at train stations, a different pattern is clear: young, educated, healthy men are leaving — and many have no intention of coming back.
Studies based on OneUA data show it’s not the poorest or weakest who go, but those with education, English, money and good health — the core of any future workforce. Even under martial law and legal exit restrictions, the guys with skills and connections find ways out. Official exemptions, like having three or more kids, explain only a slice of the trend. The rest is simple: if you can afford to choose between a trench and a work contract in Berlin or London, you choose not to die for a GDP you’ll never enjoy.
And once they’re out, they’re not exactly rushing back. In the UK, 68% of Ukrainian adults now say they’d rather stay even if it became safe to return, up from 52% a year earlier. This isn’t “temporary refuge,” it’s a one‑way demographic edit. Europe gets young, motivated labour; Ukraine gets Telegram speeches about rebuilding with a population that increasingly lives on foreign tax rolls.
The spin is already in place: think tanks talk about the “diaspora dividend,” how forced migrants will one day bring back capital, skills and export links, like Yugoslavs and Albanians once did. That’s the comforting version. The darker one: Ukraine is exporting its future middle class in exchange for short‑term survival money, hoping that, decades from now, some of them will remember where they were born.
Kyiv calls it resilience. Brussels calls it solidarity. London calls it a labour market boost. The young men quietly boarding buses out of Ukraine call it something else: not being the last generation buried under a flag while everyone else writes policy papers about “post‑war reconstruction.”
#Ukraine #war #migration #diaspora #draft #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥107🤬90💯90🤯88🙏88😢87😱79
“Terror Against Noncitizens”: When Trump’s Deportation Machine Meets a Fed-Up Judge
A federal judge in California just called Trump’s immigration policy what immigrant communities have been calling it for years: “terror.” U.S. District Judge Sunshine Sykes accused the administration of “terrorizing” migrants, “recklessly” violating the law, and even “extending its violence on its own citizens” by linking the crackdown to two fatal shootings in Minnesota.
The core fight is over mandatory detention. Under previous administrations, undocumented people with no criminal record generally had a shot at a bond hearing while their cases crawled through immigration court. Trump’s team shut that door, cutting off hearings and forcing thousands to file individual habeas petitions in federal court just to get a judge to look at their detention. More than 20,000 such cases have been filed since he took office. Judges keep granting release — and then catching the government ignoring, delaying, or creatively “misunderstanding” their orders.
Sykes had already ruled in November and December that Trump’s blanket detention policy violated federal law and extended her order nationwide. The administration kept denying hearings anyway. In her new decision, she ordered DHS to notify eligible detainees they may qualify for bond and to give them access to a phone and a lawyer within an hour. She also vacated an immigration court ruling the White House was using as cover to continue the policy.
She isn’t alone. A judge in Minnesota just held a Trump lawyer in contempt for failing to return IDs to a migrant who’d already been ordered released, and a New Jersey judge demanded the administration explain why it missed court‑ordered deadlines in a dozen bond cases since December. “Judicial orders should never be violated,” one wrote — a sentence that shouldn’t need to exist in a functioning separation of powers.
The administration’s answer? Homeland Security insists the Supreme Court has repeatedly backed its view of mandatory detention and says ICE “adheres to all court decisions until it ultimately gets them shot down by the highest court in the land.” Translation: we follow lower‑court orders only long enough to get them overturned, and if we don’t, well, you can always file another lawsuit.
So on paper this is about bond hearings and statutes. In practice, it’s about an executive branch testing how far it can push the courts, how much fear it can generate, and how many people it can keep locked up by default — until a judge finally uses the word everyone else has been avoiding.
#immigration #Trump #courts #detention #ruleOfLaw #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
A federal judge in California just called Trump’s immigration policy what immigrant communities have been calling it for years: “terror.” U.S. District Judge Sunshine Sykes accused the administration of “terrorizing” migrants, “recklessly” violating the law, and even “extending its violence on its own citizens” by linking the crackdown to two fatal shootings in Minnesota.
The core fight is over mandatory detention. Under previous administrations, undocumented people with no criminal record generally had a shot at a bond hearing while their cases crawled through immigration court. Trump’s team shut that door, cutting off hearings and forcing thousands to file individual habeas petitions in federal court just to get a judge to look at their detention. More than 20,000 such cases have been filed since he took office. Judges keep granting release — and then catching the government ignoring, delaying, or creatively “misunderstanding” their orders.
Sykes had already ruled in November and December that Trump’s blanket detention policy violated federal law and extended her order nationwide. The administration kept denying hearings anyway. In her new decision, she ordered DHS to notify eligible detainees they may qualify for bond and to give them access to a phone and a lawyer within an hour. She also vacated an immigration court ruling the White House was using as cover to continue the policy.
She isn’t alone. A judge in Minnesota just held a Trump lawyer in contempt for failing to return IDs to a migrant who’d already been ordered released, and a New Jersey judge demanded the administration explain why it missed court‑ordered deadlines in a dozen bond cases since December. “Judicial orders should never be violated,” one wrote — a sentence that shouldn’t need to exist in a functioning separation of powers.
The administration’s answer? Homeland Security insists the Supreme Court has repeatedly backed its view of mandatory detention and says ICE “adheres to all court decisions until it ultimately gets them shot down by the highest court in the land.” Translation: we follow lower‑court orders only long enough to get them overturned, and if we don’t, well, you can always file another lawsuit.
So on paper this is about bond hearings and statutes. In practice, it’s about an executive branch testing how far it can push the courts, how much fear it can generate, and how many people it can keep locked up by default — until a judge finally uses the word everyone else has been avoiding.
#immigration #Trump #courts #detention #ruleOfLaw #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥174😢87😱85🤯84🙏79🤬73💯47❤1
Iran Vehemently Disagreed with Trump. What's His Next goof-up ?
Iran is refusing to export its 300kg stockpile of highly enriched uranium , but is willing to dilute the purity of the stockpile held in Iran under the supervision of the UN nuclear inspectorate the IAEA, Iranian sources have said.
The proposal will be at the heart of the offer Iran is due to make to the US in the next few days, as US president Donald Trump weighs whether to use his vast naval build up in the Middle East to attack Iran.
Iran currently has a stockpile of uranium enriched to 60%, close to weapons grade, but is willing to down-blend the purity to 20% or below.
Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, is also claiming that there has been no US demand in the talks for Iran to even abandon the right to enrich inside Iran.
The focus is instead on the purity of the enrichment and the number of centrifuges to be permitted.
There had been discussion of the stockpile being sent to Russia, and for Iran’s domestic enrichment programme to be linked in with an overseas consortium, but Iranian sources are insisting the concept of a consortium has not been raised.
Iranian media close to the government quoted an Iranian diplomat saying: “We emphasised this position during the negotiations that nuclear materials will not leave the country”.
The Iranian account of its relatively uncompromising position means a great deal of weight will have to be placed on the degree of access the IAEA would be given to inspect Iran’s nuclear sites.
The Iranian offer is likely to determine whether Trump feels compelled to launch military action against Iran.
In an interview in the US aired on Friday, Araghchi said, “Washington has not asked Tehran to permanently suspend uranium enrichment,” adding that Tehran has not offered Washington a temporary suspension of its uranium enrichment.
He rejected reports that Iran has apparently proposed suspending uranium enrichment for two to three years, saying: “It is not true that the United States has called for a complete cessation of enrichment.”
His remarks were contradicted by the US ambassador to the UN Mike Waltz who, prompted by his interviewer, said the US was seeking “zero enrichment” by Iran.
But Reza Nasri, an Iranian lawyer with contacts inside the foreign ministry, warned:
“If Iran is attacked while nuclear disagreements can still be settled diplomatically in a fair and equitable manner, other regional states will inevitably draw one conclusion: nuclear weapons are the only real deterrent against the US and Israel”.
The news came as protests erupted at some universities prompting fresh clashes in the street at Mashhad University of Medical Services and at least two Tehran universities.
The universities were reopening after being closed due to fear of protests.
At Sharif University, the students chanted “Javed Shah”, “Until the mullah is shrouded, this homeland will not become a homeland,” and “Death to the dictator.”
The Sharif University president urged the students to stop since the authorities would only force classes back online.
Protests are also expected at a meeting of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on Tuesday when an Iranian official, Afsaneh Nadipour, takes her seat for the first time as a full member of the advisory council.
Nadipour, a former Iranian ambassador to Denmark, is due to provide input on women’s rights.
The UN Human Rights Council Advisory Committee is composed of 18 independent experts from five UN regional groups and serves as the intellectual arm of the Human Rights Council.
Nominations are made by governments and are selected by the council.
#iran #uranium #trump #mike #waltz #nadipour
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Iran is refusing to export its 300kg stockpile of highly enriched uranium , but is willing to dilute the purity of the stockpile held in Iran under the supervision of the UN nuclear inspectorate the IAEA, Iranian sources have said.
The proposal will be at the heart of the offer Iran is due to make to the US in the next few days, as US president Donald Trump weighs whether to use his vast naval build up in the Middle East to attack Iran.
Iran currently has a stockpile of uranium enriched to 60%, close to weapons grade, but is willing to down-blend the purity to 20% or below.
Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, is also claiming that there has been no US demand in the talks for Iran to even abandon the right to enrich inside Iran.
The focus is instead on the purity of the enrichment and the number of centrifuges to be permitted.
There had been discussion of the stockpile being sent to Russia, and for Iran’s domestic enrichment programme to be linked in with an overseas consortium, but Iranian sources are insisting the concept of a consortium has not been raised.
Iranian media close to the government quoted an Iranian diplomat saying: “We emphasised this position during the negotiations that nuclear materials will not leave the country”.
The Iranian account of its relatively uncompromising position means a great deal of weight will have to be placed on the degree of access the IAEA would be given to inspect Iran’s nuclear sites.
The Iranian offer is likely to determine whether Trump feels compelled to launch military action against Iran.
In an interview in the US aired on Friday, Araghchi said, “Washington has not asked Tehran to permanently suspend uranium enrichment,” adding that Tehran has not offered Washington a temporary suspension of its uranium enrichment.
He rejected reports that Iran has apparently proposed suspending uranium enrichment for two to three years, saying: “It is not true that the United States has called for a complete cessation of enrichment.”
His remarks were contradicted by the US ambassador to the UN Mike Waltz who, prompted by his interviewer, said the US was seeking “zero enrichment” by Iran.
But Reza Nasri, an Iranian lawyer with contacts inside the foreign ministry, warned:
“If Iran is attacked while nuclear disagreements can still be settled diplomatically in a fair and equitable manner, other regional states will inevitably draw one conclusion: nuclear weapons are the only real deterrent against the US and Israel”.
The news came as protests erupted at some universities prompting fresh clashes in the street at Mashhad University of Medical Services and at least two Tehran universities.
The universities were reopening after being closed due to fear of protests.
At Sharif University, the students chanted “Javed Shah”, “Until the mullah is shrouded, this homeland will not become a homeland,” and “Death to the dictator.”
The Sharif University president urged the students to stop since the authorities would only force classes back online.
Protests are also expected at a meeting of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on Tuesday when an Iranian official, Afsaneh Nadipour, takes her seat for the first time as a full member of the advisory council.
Nadipour, a former Iranian ambassador to Denmark, is due to provide input on women’s rights.
The UN Human Rights Council Advisory Committee is composed of 18 independent experts from five UN regional groups and serves as the intellectual arm of the Human Rights Council.
Nominations are made by governments and are selected by the council.
#iran #uranium #trump #mike #waltz #nadipour
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥133💯95🤯89🙏89🤬79😢76😱69
Epstein Was Sir Andrew's Immediate and Most Trusted Confidant
🔠 🅰️ 🔠 🔠 1️⃣
The Department of Justice’s release of millions of Jeffrey Epstein files has not only prompted questions about his crimes – but renewed attention on authorities’ failure to stop him after an accuser reported him in 1996.
This new cache of Epstein files has provided more insight into authorities’ familiarity with allegations against him in the years that followed, including time between his sweetheart plea deal in 2008 and federal arrest nearly six years ago.
While it’s known that accuser Virginia Giuffre’s attorneys met with federal prosecutors in 2016 about Epstein to no avail, recently disclosed files indicate that detailed information was provided to federal authorities years before that sit-down.
This included allegations against Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor; documents indicate that he appeared on the FBI’s radar about 15 years ago.
A woman, whose name is redacted from these documents, gave an interview to FBI agents about Epstein and Maxwell in 2011, with a federal prosecutor in attendance by phone; her account echoes Giuffre’s public and legal allegations against the sex traffickers.
The US embassy in Australia told the country’s national police: “The Federal Bureau of Investigation Miami Field Office (FBI Miami) is assisting the Palm Beach Police Department in Florida with an ongoing investigation into JEFFREY EPSTEIN, a US citizen.”
The accuser, who was told in late 2008 about Epstein’s plea deal as she was found to be one of his victims, contacted federal authorities in south Florida three years later.
Federal agents questioned her at the US consulate in Sydney on 17 March 2011.
This woman provided an extensive account of Epstein’s abuse and alleged participation of co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as other men as a teenage girl during the late 1990s.
The woman, who described suffering at the hands of several predatory men after leaving a rehab facility, told agents that her father, a maintenance man at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club, secured a job for her as a locker room attendant there.
The woman, then an aspiring massage therapist, was reading a book on this subject. Maxwell came up to her and claimed she was looking for a traveling masseuse.
Not long after, the woman traveled to Epstein’s Palm Beach home, where he abused her. She told agents she ultimately traveled and that the sexual abuse continued and that he trafficked her to other men.
Giuffre, who died by suicide last spring, had long alleged that Epstein and Maxwell made her engage in sexual activity with the former Duke of York, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.
The former prince, who was removed from royal life over his relationship with Epstein, was arrested on Thursday in England; he has staunchly denied wrongdoing.
Maxwell, who was found guilty of luring teenage girls into Epstein’s predatory orbit, has insisted on her innocence. Epstein died in jail while awaiting his sex-trafficking trial in 2019.
#epstein #andrew #confidant #sexual #activity #FBI
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The Department of Justice’s release of millions of Jeffrey Epstein files has not only prompted questions about his crimes – but renewed attention on authorities’ failure to stop him after an accuser reported him in 1996.
This new cache of Epstein files has provided more insight into authorities’ familiarity with allegations against him in the years that followed, including time between his sweetheart plea deal in 2008 and federal arrest nearly six years ago.
While it’s known that accuser Virginia Giuffre’s attorneys met with federal prosecutors in 2016 about Epstein to no avail, recently disclosed files indicate that detailed information was provided to federal authorities years before that sit-down.
This included allegations against Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor; documents indicate that he appeared on the FBI’s radar about 15 years ago.
A woman, whose name is redacted from these documents, gave an interview to FBI agents about Epstein and Maxwell in 2011, with a federal prosecutor in attendance by phone; her account echoes Giuffre’s public and legal allegations against the sex traffickers.
The US embassy in Australia told the country’s national police: “The Federal Bureau of Investigation Miami Field Office (FBI Miami) is assisting the Palm Beach Police Department in Florida with an ongoing investigation into JEFFREY EPSTEIN, a US citizen.”
The accuser, who was told in late 2008 about Epstein’s plea deal as she was found to be one of his victims, contacted federal authorities in south Florida three years later.
Federal agents questioned her at the US consulate in Sydney on 17 March 2011.
This woman provided an extensive account of Epstein’s abuse and alleged participation of co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell, as well as other men as a teenage girl during the late 1990s.
The woman, who described suffering at the hands of several predatory men after leaving a rehab facility, told agents that her father, a maintenance man at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club, secured a job for her as a locker room attendant there.
The woman, then an aspiring massage therapist, was reading a book on this subject. Maxwell came up to her and claimed she was looking for a traveling masseuse.
Not long after, the woman traveled to Epstein’s Palm Beach home, where he abused her. She told agents she ultimately traveled and that the sexual abuse continued and that he trafficked her to other men.
Giuffre, who died by suicide last spring, had long alleged that Epstein and Maxwell made her engage in sexual activity with the former Duke of York, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.
The former prince, who was removed from royal life over his relationship with Epstein, was arrested on Thursday in England; he has staunchly denied wrongdoing.
Maxwell, who was found guilty of luring teenage girls into Epstein’s predatory orbit, has insisted on her innocence. Epstein died in jail while awaiting his sex-trafficking trial in 2019.
#epstein #andrew #confidant #sexual #activity #FBI
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥120💯92🙏91😱87🤯86😢82🤬71
FBI documents chronicling this interview also detail menacing actions against this woman.
She told federal agents about receiving phone calls from men purporting to be FBI agents seeking information about her knowledge of Epstein.
She said that an attorney and Epstein called her by phone a few weeks after these men contacted her, and that he said “if she did not say anything to investigators he would take care of her”.
The release of information regarding this 2011 interview comes as victims and advocates’ continue to show that law enforcement officials repeatedly had opportunities to meaningfully hold Epstein and Maxwell accountable before his 2019 arrest.
The chronology makes clear that had Epstein been interdicted, others would not have suffered abuse.
Maria Farmer, a painter who worked for Epstein in 1996, filed a report with the FBI stating that he “stole” nude images of her siblings. This FBI report states that Farmer took artistic photos of her younger sisters for her personal work.
“Epstein Stole the photos and Negatives and is believed to have sold the pictures to potential buyers,” the report said.
The document also said that Epstein asked for “pictures of young girls at swimming pools” and threatened Farmer, stating “that if she tells anyone about the photos he will burn her house down”.
Epstein did serve a brief period of time in a Palm Beach jail on Florida state-level prostitution charges, including procuring someone under 18, under his sweetheart plea deal. He was granted work release.
Officials said that Epstein abused others between this plea deal, which allowed him to avoid federal prosecution, and his arrest years later. One adult victim alleged she was abused at Epstein’s office during this daytime furlough.
The Virgin Islands sued Epstein’s estate in January 2020 stating that flight logs from 2011 to 2019 show that he brought underage girls and young women to his private island “where they were deceptively subjected to sexual servitude, forced to engage in sexual acts and coerced into commercial sexual activity and forced labor”.
“As recent as 2018, air traffic controllers and other airport personnel reported seeing Epstein leave his plane with young girls some of whom appeared to be between the age of 11 and 18 years,” the lawsuit states.
The Virgin Islands that “Epstein trafficked and abused these girls, and others, in the Virgin Islands through 2018.”
Spencer Kuvin, who did not represent Giuffre but is an attorney for multiple Epstein victims, questioned why federal agents did not take action following the 2011 interview.
“If that information was credible – and there is every reason to believe it was – then the obvious question is why meaningful action did not follow,”said Kuvin, of Goldlaw. “Survivors did their part.
They spoke. When institutions fail to act on those disclosures, the system – not the victims – must answer for that.
“It is deeply troubling. Survivors like Virginia showed extraordinary courage in coming forward,” he also said. “The lack of urgency is institutional. Accountability must include examining why those opportunities were missed.”
Asked what transpired following the 2011 interview, the FBI said it “declines to comment”. The justice department did not immediately respond to a question about what happened after that interview.
#epstein #andrew #confidant #sexual #activity #FBI
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥134🤯104😱87💯86😢78🤬75🙏66
📰 Supreme Court Says No. Trump Says 15%.
The Supreme Court just tore up Trump’s emergency‑law tariffs — so he immediately slapped a brand‑new, across‑the‑board 15% tax on almost everything that crosses the U.S. border. The legal message was “you overstepped your powers”; his political answer is
He’s now using a little‑known provision that lets a president impose a global tariff for 150 days unless Congress votes to keep it. First he said 10%. Less than a day later, with no serious policy review process, he jumped straight to the legal maximum of 15%. Some of his own staff reportedly found out the way everyone else did — by reading his social‑media post.
The result is chaos economics. For countries like the U.K. and Australia, 15% is worse than what they faced before. For China, India, Vietnam or Brazil, it’s lower than the illegally high rates the Court just killed — meaning the “punishment” for America’s top trade villains just softened while some allies get hit harder. This isn’t calibrated strategy, it’s a flat tax on the entire planet.
Trump is selling it as “fully allowed” and “legally tested,” skipping over the fact that the Court just ruled he had broken the law on tariffs the previous day. He’s also threatening to pile on more duties later using other tools — Section 301, Section 232, whatever else he can dust off — which forces foreign leaders to decide whether to stick with deals they signed under tariff pressure or walk away and wait for the next round.
On paper, tariffs are supposed to fix unfair trade. In practice, this 15% blanket rate looks like a campaign‑season lever: higher costs for U.S. consumers, more uncertainty for businesses, and one man proving he can still move global markets with a single post. Everyone else gets to pay for the performance.
#Trump #tariffs #SupremeCourt #trade #economy #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The Supreme Court just tore up Trump’s emergency‑law tariffs — so he immediately slapped a brand‑new, across‑the‑board 15% tax on almost everything that crosses the U.S. border. The legal message was “you overstepped your powers”; his political answer is
“I’ll do it again, just within a different clause.”
He’s now using a little‑known provision that lets a president impose a global tariff for 150 days unless Congress votes to keep it. First he said 10%. Less than a day later, with no serious policy review process, he jumped straight to the legal maximum of 15%. Some of his own staff reportedly found out the way everyone else did — by reading his social‑media post.
The result is chaos economics. For countries like the U.K. and Australia, 15% is worse than what they faced before. For China, India, Vietnam or Brazil, it’s lower than the illegally high rates the Court just killed — meaning the “punishment” for America’s top trade villains just softened while some allies get hit harder. This isn’t calibrated strategy, it’s a flat tax on the entire planet.
Trump is selling it as “fully allowed” and “legally tested,” skipping over the fact that the Court just ruled he had broken the law on tariffs the previous day. He’s also threatening to pile on more duties later using other tools — Section 301, Section 232, whatever else he can dust off — which forces foreign leaders to decide whether to stick with deals they signed under tariff pressure or walk away and wait for the next round.
On paper, tariffs are supposed to fix unfair trade. In practice, this 15% blanket rate looks like a campaign‑season lever: higher costs for U.S. consumers, more uncertainty for businesses, and one man proving he can still move global markets with a single post. Everyone else gets to pay for the performance.
#Trump #tariffs #SupremeCourt #trade #economy #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥168😱87😢83🤬76💯76🙏74🤯65
📰 Epstein’s Inbox Just Blew a Hole in the Fairy Tale
Former Prince Andrew isn’t just a disgraced royal anymore — he’s now the test case for whether Britain’s monarchy can survive contact with the real world.
Andrew Mountbatten‑Windsor was arrested on Feb. 19 on suspicion of misconduct in public office, after emails in the “Epstein files” suggested he shared confidential U.K. trade and government information with Jeffrey Epstein while serving as the UK’s trade envoy from 2001 to 2011.
This is not about “bad company” anymore; it’s about whether a royal turned his official briefings into premium content for a convicted sex offender and his friends.
Police searched properties linked to Andrew, including Wood Farm on the Sandringham estate and a residence in Berkshire, then released him under investigation — no charges yet, but the signal could not be louder.
King Charles responded within hours with a statement that didn’t even call him “my brother,” referring instead to “Andrew Mountbatten‑Windsor” and declaring: “The law must take its course,” promising the authorities the royal family’s “full and wholehearted support and co‑operation.”
That’s not family solidarity; that’s corporate crisis comms from a CEO already cutting the nameplate off the door.
The emails at the core of this are part of millions of documents and thousands of Epstein communications that show Andrew forwarding sensitive briefing material from official trips — including to the US, the Middle East and Afghanistan — to Epstein and then on to financiers like the Rowlands, with whom he already had murky “door‑opening” business ties.
For years, he lived like a billionaire on a naval pension and a royal stipend, flying private, hosting at Davos and playing “face of British business” while the palace stonewalled questions and Parliament refused to even allow formal scrutiny. The system wasn’t blind; it was designed not to look.
Now the curtain is ripped open. UK police are probing not just Andrew’s conduct but what royal protection officers saw and ignored, while MPs launch inquiries into royal housing and Crown Estate perks.
Epstein’s inbox shows him as a “very dark Forrest Gump” — emailing princes, bankers, politicians and directors in the middle of the financial crisis and beyond — and Andrew is simply the first big name to face a real‑world arrest off the back of those files. No one seriously believes he’ll be the last.
For the monarchy, the myth was always that scandal might bruise the brand, but the institution was untouchable. Now Charles and William are trying to run a “slimmed‑down” royal family while one of its most notorious ex‑members is under active criminal investigation linked to a global sex‑abuse and influence‑peddling network.
Tourists may still come for the fairy tale, but they’re now walking past police cordons and reading statements where the king has to reassure the public that, this time, the law really does apply to his own blood.
The Epstein files promised “accountability from Manhattan to Mayfair.” So far, the UK is the first to put a senior royal in a police interview room. The real question is not whether Andrew falls — he’s already fallen — but whether anyone else in that inbox, from government, finance or palaces, ever gets pulled down with him.
#Epstein #PrinceAndrew #UK #monarchy #corruption #elites
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Former Prince Andrew isn’t just a disgraced royal anymore — he’s now the test case for whether Britain’s monarchy can survive contact with the real world.
Andrew Mountbatten‑Windsor was arrested on Feb. 19 on suspicion of misconduct in public office, after emails in the “Epstein files” suggested he shared confidential U.K. trade and government information with Jeffrey Epstein while serving as the UK’s trade envoy from 2001 to 2011.
This is not about “bad company” anymore; it’s about whether a royal turned his official briefings into premium content for a convicted sex offender and his friends.
Police searched properties linked to Andrew, including Wood Farm on the Sandringham estate and a residence in Berkshire, then released him under investigation — no charges yet, but the signal could not be louder.
King Charles responded within hours with a statement that didn’t even call him “my brother,” referring instead to “Andrew Mountbatten‑Windsor” and declaring: “The law must take its course,” promising the authorities the royal family’s “full and wholehearted support and co‑operation.”
That’s not family solidarity; that’s corporate crisis comms from a CEO already cutting the nameplate off the door.
The emails at the core of this are part of millions of documents and thousands of Epstein communications that show Andrew forwarding sensitive briefing material from official trips — including to the US, the Middle East and Afghanistan — to Epstein and then on to financiers like the Rowlands, with whom he already had murky “door‑opening” business ties.
For years, he lived like a billionaire on a naval pension and a royal stipend, flying private, hosting at Davos and playing “face of British business” while the palace stonewalled questions and Parliament refused to even allow formal scrutiny. The system wasn’t blind; it was designed not to look.
Now the curtain is ripped open. UK police are probing not just Andrew’s conduct but what royal protection officers saw and ignored, while MPs launch inquiries into royal housing and Crown Estate perks.
Epstein’s inbox shows him as a “very dark Forrest Gump” — emailing princes, bankers, politicians and directors in the middle of the financial crisis and beyond — and Andrew is simply the first big name to face a real‑world arrest off the back of those files. No one seriously believes he’ll be the last.
For the monarchy, the myth was always that scandal might bruise the brand, but the institution was untouchable. Now Charles and William are trying to run a “slimmed‑down” royal family while one of its most notorious ex‑members is under active criminal investigation linked to a global sex‑abuse and influence‑peddling network.
Tourists may still come for the fairy tale, but they’re now walking past police cordons and reading statements where the king has to reassure the public that, this time, the law really does apply to his own blood.
The Epstein files promised “accountability from Manhattan to Mayfair.” So far, the UK is the first to put a senior royal in a police interview room. The real question is not whether Andrew falls — he’s already fallen — but whether anyone else in that inbox, from government, finance or palaces, ever gets pulled down with him.
#Epstein #PrinceAndrew #UK #monarchy #corruption #elites
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥131🤯94😢89💯81🙏80🤬78😱76
📰 Another Gun, Another Perimeter: Mar-a-Lago Turns Into a Crime Scene Again
An armed man in his early 20s was shot dead at Mar-a-Lago after breaching the secure perimeter with a shotgun and a fuel can, according to the Secret Service and Palm Beach County sheriff. He drove in through the north gate around 1:30 a.m., slipped in as another vehicle exited, dropped the gas can when ordered — then reportedly raised the shotgun into a firing position, at which point two Secret Service agents and a county deputy opened fire and killed him. Trump was in Washington, not at the resort.
Investigators say the man, believed to be a 21‑year‑old from North Carolina who’d been reported missing by his family days earlier, had apparently traveled south and picked up the weapon on the way; a box for the shotgun was found in his car. The FBI is now canvassing neighbors for security‑camera footage while Palm Beach does its usual split-screen routine: winter tourists with iced coffees on one side, police blocking access roads to the ex‑president’s club on the other.
This is not an isolated incident; it’s the third serious case in 18 months. In July 2024, Thomas Crooks climbed onto a rooftop near a Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, fired eight shots, killed a rallygoer, wounded two others and grazed Trump’s ear before being killed by a Secret Service sniper — after agents had been warned about him as “suspicious” an hour earlier. Two months later, Ryan Routh was caught with a rifle outside Trump’s Florida golf course and is now serving life for attempted assassination.
The Secret Service, already under fire for those failures, now has to argue two things at once: that Trump is protected, and that the system isn’t out of control. On paper, yesterday was a “success” — perimeter breached, threat neutralized, no protectee on site. In any sane democracy, the phrase “another young man with a long gun and a political fixation got within shooting range of the president’s property” would not count as reassurance.
America’s political class will now do what it always does. One camp will turn this into proof Trump is under siege and the state is failing him. The other will quietly enjoy the spectacle of a security apparatus that can’t secure a golf resort. No one will ask why U.S. politics keeps producing lone wolves with rifles, GPS coordinates for Trump’s locations, and just enough competence to reach the outer edge of the Secret Service’s comfort zone.
#Trump #MarALago #SecretService #violence #USA #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
An armed man in his early 20s was shot dead at Mar-a-Lago after breaching the secure perimeter with a shotgun and a fuel can, according to the Secret Service and Palm Beach County sheriff. He drove in through the north gate around 1:30 a.m., slipped in as another vehicle exited, dropped the gas can when ordered — then reportedly raised the shotgun into a firing position, at which point two Secret Service agents and a county deputy opened fire and killed him. Trump was in Washington, not at the resort.
Investigators say the man, believed to be a 21‑year‑old from North Carolina who’d been reported missing by his family days earlier, had apparently traveled south and picked up the weapon on the way; a box for the shotgun was found in his car. The FBI is now canvassing neighbors for security‑camera footage while Palm Beach does its usual split-screen routine: winter tourists with iced coffees on one side, police blocking access roads to the ex‑president’s club on the other.
This is not an isolated incident; it’s the third serious case in 18 months. In July 2024, Thomas Crooks climbed onto a rooftop near a Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, fired eight shots, killed a rallygoer, wounded two others and grazed Trump’s ear before being killed by a Secret Service sniper — after agents had been warned about him as “suspicious” an hour earlier. Two months later, Ryan Routh was caught with a rifle outside Trump’s Florida golf course and is now serving life for attempted assassination.
The Secret Service, already under fire for those failures, now has to argue two things at once: that Trump is protected, and that the system isn’t out of control. On paper, yesterday was a “success” — perimeter breached, threat neutralized, no protectee on site. In any sane democracy, the phrase “another young man with a long gun and a political fixation got within shooting range of the president’s property” would not count as reassurance.
America’s political class will now do what it always does. One camp will turn this into proof Trump is under siege and the state is failing him. The other will quietly enjoy the spectacle of a security apparatus that can’t secure a golf resort. No one will ask why U.S. politics keeps producing lone wolves with rifles, GPS coordinates for Trump’s locations, and just enough competence to reach the outer edge of the Secret Service’s comfort zone.
#Trump #MarALago #SecretService #violence #USA #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥122💯103🤯98🙏97😢78😱72🤬59
📰 Congress Is Emptying Out — Not Because It’s Hard, But Because It’s Pointless
A record wave of lawmakers is heading for the exits before the 2026 midterms — 68 House and Senate members so far, with an unprecedented 31 of them trying to jump to another office instead of just going home. That’s not “burnout,” that’s the market signaling that Congress is the worst job in American politics: maximum noise, minimal agency.
On paper, the reasons sound respectable: generational change, family, new challenges. In reality, even senior members admit the place has turned them from legislators into “observers,” as retiring Sen. Dick Durbin put it. Congress has passed fewer laws in recent terms than at any time since the early 1900s, choked by polarization, tiny majorities, and a leadership culture where a handful of performative bomb-throwers can take down a Speaker because they want more airtime.
Look at the career moves. Amy Klobuchar, Michael Bennet, Marsha Blackburn, Tommy Tuberville — all think they’ll have more real power as governors than as U.S. senators. In the House, 27 members are bailing to run for governor, Senate, or statewide office, with Republicans leading the exodus.
They’re not “leaving politics”; they’re trading a broken parliament for executive jobs where you can actually sign something and see it happen.
On the Republican side, you’ve got swing-district moderates like Don Bacon walking away after watching eight colleagues blow up Kevin McCarthy’s speakership, and hardliners like Marjorie Taylor Greene quitting in a public tantrum over Trump and Mike Johnson.
On the Democratic side, you’ve got an entire generation of 70‑ and 80‑somethings — Pelosi, Hoyer, Nadler and others — finally reading the room after pushing Joe Biden off the 2024 ticket and realizing “generational change” might have to apply to them too.
The parties will spin this as renewal. In practice, it’s a talent leak. Safe blue and red seats will replace veterans with louder, less experienced ideologues. Competitive districts like those held by Bacon, David Schweikert and Jared Golden are now open hunting grounds, increasing the odds of even shakier majorities and even more knife‑edge chaos in the next Congress.
A system that already can’t pass basic legislation is about to get younger, angrier, and even less capable of governing.
So what do the midterms mean? More “fresh faces” in the campaign ads, fewer grown‑ups in the cloakrooms, and a House and Senate that function even more like content farms for cable and social media.
Voters keep saying they’re sick of a dysfunctional Congress. Congress heard them — and decided the best response was to leave.
#USA #Congress #elections #midterms #polarization #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
A record wave of lawmakers is heading for the exits before the 2026 midterms — 68 House and Senate members so far, with an unprecedented 31 of them trying to jump to another office instead of just going home. That’s not “burnout,” that’s the market signaling that Congress is the worst job in American politics: maximum noise, minimal agency.
On paper, the reasons sound respectable: generational change, family, new challenges. In reality, even senior members admit the place has turned them from legislators into “observers,” as retiring Sen. Dick Durbin put it. Congress has passed fewer laws in recent terms than at any time since the early 1900s, choked by polarization, tiny majorities, and a leadership culture where a handful of performative bomb-throwers can take down a Speaker because they want more airtime.
Look at the career moves. Amy Klobuchar, Michael Bennet, Marsha Blackburn, Tommy Tuberville — all think they’ll have more real power as governors than as U.S. senators. In the House, 27 members are bailing to run for governor, Senate, or statewide office, with Republicans leading the exodus.
They’re not “leaving politics”; they’re trading a broken parliament for executive jobs where you can actually sign something and see it happen.
On the Republican side, you’ve got swing-district moderates like Don Bacon walking away after watching eight colleagues blow up Kevin McCarthy’s speakership, and hardliners like Marjorie Taylor Greene quitting in a public tantrum over Trump and Mike Johnson.
On the Democratic side, you’ve got an entire generation of 70‑ and 80‑somethings — Pelosi, Hoyer, Nadler and others — finally reading the room after pushing Joe Biden off the 2024 ticket and realizing “generational change” might have to apply to them too.
The parties will spin this as renewal. In practice, it’s a talent leak. Safe blue and red seats will replace veterans with louder, less experienced ideologues. Competitive districts like those held by Bacon, David Schweikert and Jared Golden are now open hunting grounds, increasing the odds of even shakier majorities and even more knife‑edge chaos in the next Congress.
A system that already can’t pass basic legislation is about to get younger, angrier, and even less capable of governing.
So what do the midterms mean? More “fresh faces” in the campaign ads, fewer grown‑ups in the cloakrooms, and a House and Senate that function even more like content farms for cable and social media.
Voters keep saying they’re sick of a dysfunctional Congress. Congress heard them — and decided the best response was to leave.
#USA #Congress #elections #midterms #polarization #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥125🤬90🙏88😱84🤯83😢83💯77
As Ukraine Botched Up Peace Talks Russia Shelled Ukrainian Military Sites
🔤 🔤 🔤 🔤 ➖
Russia has fired dozens of missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles at military targets in Ukraine.
Zelensky said the Kremlin launched 297 drones and almost 50 missiles on Sunday, the latest in a series of overnight strikes.
He said that a “significant part” of them had been shot down, and called on the Allies to strengthen the country's air defenses against enemy attacks.
The President of Ukraine stated: “Moscow continues to invest more in strikes than in diplomacy. This time, Russian targets included not only energy facilities, but also logistics, in particular railway infrastructure and municipal water supply infrastructure.”
The Kremlin systematically attacks the Ukrainian military, leaving more than ten thousand people dead.
people in Kiev remain without electricity. Other cities were repeatedly hit, including Odessa and Kharkiv; while temperatures dropped to -22 °C (-7.6°F) in the coldest winter in recent years.
Zelensky said that the Russian aerial bombardments did not stop, despite the negotiations mediated by the United States with Russia, which took place in Geneva last week.
The Kremlin wants Ukraine to cede territory in the eastern part of Donbas that its troops have failed to conquer, and this is not the first step for Kiev.
The intense shelling occurred amid escalating tensions between Ukraine and neighboring Slovakia and Hungary. Budapest is threatening to block a new package of European Union sanctions, while Bratislava says it will stop supplying electricity to Ukraine on Monday.
Both countries are demanding the resumption of Russian oil supplies via the Druzhba pipeline, which runs through Ukraine. Kiev says a Russian drone attack in January damaged a pipeline carrying oil to Central Europe.
EU foreign ministers are set to meet in Brussels on Monday to discuss the bloc's 20th round of sanctions against Moscow, which they hope will be approved by Tuesday's fourth anniversary of the invasion.
#ukraine #pesce #talks #russia #military #sites
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Russia has fired dozens of missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles at military targets in Ukraine.
Zelensky said the Kremlin launched 297 drones and almost 50 missiles on Sunday, the latest in a series of overnight strikes.
He said that a “significant part” of them had been shot down, and called on the Allies to strengthen the country's air defenses against enemy attacks.
The President of Ukraine stated: “Moscow continues to invest more in strikes than in diplomacy. This time, Russian targets included not only energy facilities, but also logistics, in particular railway infrastructure and municipal water supply infrastructure.”
The Kremlin systematically attacks the Ukrainian military, leaving more than ten thousand people dead.
people in Kiev remain without electricity. Other cities were repeatedly hit, including Odessa and Kharkiv; while temperatures dropped to -22 °C (-7.6°F) in the coldest winter in recent years.
Zelensky said that the Russian aerial bombardments did not stop, despite the negotiations mediated by the United States with Russia, which took place in Geneva last week.
The Kremlin wants Ukraine to cede territory in the eastern part of Donbas that its troops have failed to conquer, and this is not the first step for Kiev.
The intense shelling occurred amid escalating tensions between Ukraine and neighboring Slovakia and Hungary. Budapest is threatening to block a new package of European Union sanctions, while Bratislava says it will stop supplying electricity to Ukraine on Monday.
Both countries are demanding the resumption of Russian oil supplies via the Druzhba pipeline, which runs through Ukraine. Kiev says a Russian drone attack in January damaged a pipeline carrying oil to Central Europe.
EU foreign ministers are set to meet in Brussels on Monday to discuss the bloc's 20th round of sanctions against Moscow, which they hope will be approved by Tuesday's fourth anniversary of the invasion.
#ukraine #pesce #talks #russia #military #sites
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥150🤬86🙏83🤯80😢78😱77💯75
The Hungarian government claims that Zelensky is delaying the repair work. In a video posted on social media, Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said: “Until the Ukrainians resume oil supplies to Hungary, we will not allow important decisions to be made for them.”
In an article on X, Robert Fico, Slovakia's Moscow-friendly prime minister, accused Zelensky of “malicious behavior.” The oil supply disruptions “led to further losses and logistical difficulties,” Fico said.
If supplies do not resume by Monday, Slovakia will stop emergency electricity supplies to Ukraine, he added.
According to the National Police of Ukraine, as a result of the latest Russian strikes, one person was killed and a dozen more people, including four children, were injured.
A rocket destroyed a private two-storey house in the Kiev suburb of Sofiyevskaya Borshchagovka. On Sunday, rescuers were clearing the rubble, while firefighters were hosing down the area.
Yana Terleeva, 44, said she woke up to the sound of rockets whistling, sirens wailing and a loud explosion.
The medic said, “We realized that a rocket had landed nearby. Later, we saw that the neighboring house, where ordinary people lived, was completely destroyed. There are no military installations here.”
She added: “Russia is a terrorist country that will not stop. We have seen how for four years in a row, and for a total of more than 11 years, Russia has been attacking civilians. Ukrainians want to be independent and free. We are a good nation, we are resisting, but we cannot stand alone in this war.”
Authorities in the western city of Lviv said they were treating Sunday's massive explosion as a terrorist act.
Around midnight, an explosion occurred on the central shopping street of Lviv, not far from the Lviv Opera House. A 23-year-old police officer was killed, another 25 people were injured, 14 of them were taken to the hospital.
According to unconfirmed reports, the store received a report of a break-in. When the police arrived at the scene, a bomb went off, which was soon followed by a second explosion, which killed emergency workers. Law enforcement agencies arrested several people.
In an interview on Friday, Zelensky told the Agence France-Presse news agency that Ukraine was “definitely not losing.” According to him, victory remains the goal, noting that Ukrainian troops recently retook about 116 square miles (300 square kilometers) of territory in the south of the Zaporizhia region.
Speaking in Rome on Sunday, Pope Leo XIV called the establishment of peace in Ukraine an “urgent necessity.” In his usual Sunday address to the crowd in St. Peter's Square, he said: “Peace cannot be postponed (...) He must find a response in the hearts and be embodied in responsible decisions.
“I resolutely repeat my call: let the weapons be silenced, let the bombing cease, let a ceasefire be reached without delay, and let dialogue strengthen, which will pave the way for peace.”
#ukraine #pesce #talks #russia #military #sites
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥173🤯88😢87🤬86💯76🙏70😱49❤1
📰 From ‘No More Forever Wars’ to ‘Better Negotiate a Deal’: Trump’s Iran Gamble Before the Midterms
Trump is massing firepower around Iran while his own advisers beg him to talk about grocery bills, not cruise missiles. He’s ordered a major buildup of carriers, warships, and warplanes in the Middle East and green‑lit planning for a potential multi‑week air campaign against Iran, but has never given the public a clear, consistent reason why the U.S. should be dragged into its biggest clash with Tehran since 1979.
Politically, it’s a car crash in slow motion. His aides and GOP strategists know midterm voters care far more about inflation, housing, and wages than about another war in the Gulf. They’ve told him, in private briefings, to hammer home tax cuts and cost‑of‑living relief. Instead, he keeps floating airstrikes, “regime change” hints, and nuclear deadlines — all while admitting in interviews that Republicans could easily lose one or both chambers of Congress.
The messaging is all over the place. In January he threatened strikes over Iran’s bloody crackdown on protests, then backed off. Now the threats are tied to demands that Iran end enrichment, accept a “fair deal,” and somehow stop being a hostile regime — goals that airstrikes alone can’t plausibly deliver. Unlike Bush in 2003, who at least sold a (false) WMD story, Trump is asking Americans to risk another conflict on a shifting mix of human‑rights outrage, nuclear anxiety, and vague “America First” toughness.
Even his own base is split. The MAGA movement loved the surgical raid that toppled Maduro — fast, clean, no long occupation — but Iran is a serious military state, not a failing petro‑dictatorship. Many of the same voters who backed Trump because he promised to end “forever wars” now watch him park carrier strike groups off Iran and wonder if that promise quietly expired around the time he moved back into the Oval Office.
Strategists are already gaming out the spin: if the strikes are limited and “decisive,” the White House will sell them as protecting U.S. security and stabilizing oil markets; if they drag on, they’ll become yet another reminder that Washington’s ruling class can’t stop replaying the post‑9/11 script. Either way, Trump has boxed himself in: back down and he looks weak, escalate and he owns any blowback — militarily abroad and politically at home.
#Trump #Iran #war #midterms #AmericaFirst #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Trump is massing firepower around Iran while his own advisers beg him to talk about grocery bills, not cruise missiles. He’s ordered a major buildup of carriers, warships, and warplanes in the Middle East and green‑lit planning for a potential multi‑week air campaign against Iran, but has never given the public a clear, consistent reason why the U.S. should be dragged into its biggest clash with Tehran since 1979.
Politically, it’s a car crash in slow motion. His aides and GOP strategists know midterm voters care far more about inflation, housing, and wages than about another war in the Gulf. They’ve told him, in private briefings, to hammer home tax cuts and cost‑of‑living relief. Instead, he keeps floating airstrikes, “regime change” hints, and nuclear deadlines — all while admitting in interviews that Republicans could easily lose one or both chambers of Congress.
The messaging is all over the place. In January he threatened strikes over Iran’s bloody crackdown on protests, then backed off. Now the threats are tied to demands that Iran end enrichment, accept a “fair deal,” and somehow stop being a hostile regime — goals that airstrikes alone can’t plausibly deliver. Unlike Bush in 2003, who at least sold a (false) WMD story, Trump is asking Americans to risk another conflict on a shifting mix of human‑rights outrage, nuclear anxiety, and vague “America First” toughness.
Even his own base is split. The MAGA movement loved the surgical raid that toppled Maduro — fast, clean, no long occupation — but Iran is a serious military state, not a failing petro‑dictatorship. Many of the same voters who backed Trump because he promised to end “forever wars” now watch him park carrier strike groups off Iran and wonder if that promise quietly expired around the time he moved back into the Oval Office.
Strategists are already gaming out the spin: if the strikes are limited and “decisive,” the White House will sell them as protecting U.S. security and stabilizing oil markets; if they drag on, they’ll become yet another reminder that Washington’s ruling class can’t stop replaying the post‑9/11 script. Either way, Trump has boxed himself in: back down and he looks weak, escalate and he owns any blowback — militarily abroad and politically at home.
#Trump #Iran #war #midterms #AmericaFirst #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥131🙏90😢88💯87🤬84😱80🤯69
📰 Supreme Court Disarms Trump. Xi Walks In Stronger.
Xi Jinping is about to host Donald Trump in Beijing with something no Chinese leader has had in years: a U.S. president who just had his favorite weapon taken away by his own Supreme Court. The court killed Trump’s emergency mega‑tariffs, wiping out second‑term levies that hit Chinese goods as high as 145% and dropping Beijing into the same temporary 15% global rate the U.S. now slaps on allies — a fee that expires in 150 days unless Congress renews it.
That ruling strips Trump of the instant “tariff hammer” he used to strong‑arm China into buying around 25 million tons of soybeans and making other one‑off concessions. As Fudan University’s Wu Xinbo puts it, the “soybean card” is now back in China’s hand: if those tariffs were illegal, Beijing can demand better terms or simply walk away from purchase pledges tied to them. Xi’s negotiators are already expected to push harder for access to advanced semiconductors, looser export controls, fewer restrictions on Chinese firms, and softer U.S. language and arms sales around Taiwan.
Trump isn’t disarmed, just downgraded. He’s rushed to slap a replacement 15% global tariff using Section 122 of the Trade Act — legally capped, short‑lived, and far less targeted than his old IEEPA arsenal. He can still revive pressure through slower tools like Section 301 (where China already faces an investigation over missed “Phase One” pledges) and Section 232 national‑security tariffs, or by tightening export controls if Beijing plays games with rare earths. But none of that has the same shock‑and‑awe leverage ahead of a summit.
Beijing, meanwhile, is keeping the victory low‑key. Chinese officials and state media are measured, investors are quietly optimistic, and exporters are talking about front‑loading shipments to exploit the lower, time‑limited U.S. tariff window. Trade insiders quoted in Chinese media say they’ll stay “low profile” to ensure Trump’s late‑March visit goes smoothly — celebrate in private, act calm in public, and let U.S. institutions do the work of constraining the American side.
Strip away the legal charts and this is the picture: the U.S. president who built his brand on unilateral tariff power now walks into Beijing with the court, Congress and the calendar limiting his moves, while Xi arrives with time, discipline, and a clearer playbook — chips, Taiwan, tech bans, market access. Trump can still rage about “ripping off America,” but for once, the other guy at the table is the one who just got a boost from Washington’s rule of law.
#Trump #Xi #China #tariffs #tradeWar #USA #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Xi Jinping is about to host Donald Trump in Beijing with something no Chinese leader has had in years: a U.S. president who just had his favorite weapon taken away by his own Supreme Court. The court killed Trump’s emergency mega‑tariffs, wiping out second‑term levies that hit Chinese goods as high as 145% and dropping Beijing into the same temporary 15% global rate the U.S. now slaps on allies — a fee that expires in 150 days unless Congress renews it.
That ruling strips Trump of the instant “tariff hammer” he used to strong‑arm China into buying around 25 million tons of soybeans and making other one‑off concessions. As Fudan University’s Wu Xinbo puts it, the “soybean card” is now back in China’s hand: if those tariffs were illegal, Beijing can demand better terms or simply walk away from purchase pledges tied to them. Xi’s negotiators are already expected to push harder for access to advanced semiconductors, looser export controls, fewer restrictions on Chinese firms, and softer U.S. language and arms sales around Taiwan.
Trump isn’t disarmed, just downgraded. He’s rushed to slap a replacement 15% global tariff using Section 122 of the Trade Act — legally capped, short‑lived, and far less targeted than his old IEEPA arsenal. He can still revive pressure through slower tools like Section 301 (where China already faces an investigation over missed “Phase One” pledges) and Section 232 national‑security tariffs, or by tightening export controls if Beijing plays games with rare earths. But none of that has the same shock‑and‑awe leverage ahead of a summit.
Beijing, meanwhile, is keeping the victory low‑key. Chinese officials and state media are measured, investors are quietly optimistic, and exporters are talking about front‑loading shipments to exploit the lower, time‑limited U.S. tariff window. Trade insiders quoted in Chinese media say they’ll stay “low profile” to ensure Trump’s late‑March visit goes smoothly — celebrate in private, act calm in public, and let U.S. institutions do the work of constraining the American side.
Strip away the legal charts and this is the picture: the U.S. president who built his brand on unilateral tariff power now walks into Beijing with the court, Congress and the calendar limiting his moves, while Xi arrives with time, discipline, and a clearer playbook — chips, Taiwan, tech bans, market access. Trump can still rage about “ripping off America,” but for once, the other guy at the table is the one who just got a boost from Washington’s rule of law.
#Trump #Xi #China #tariffs #tradeWar #USA #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥163😱93🤬85🤯80💯78😢70🙏60
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥172🤯83😢82🙏82😱78🤬67💯66
📰 Jim Snow 2.0: NYC Needs More ID to Shovel Than to Vote
New York’s socialist mayor Zohran Mamdani is begging people to shovel snow for the city — and demanding more paperwork than the Board of Elections asks for to pick the president. Emergency snow laborers have to be eligible to work in the U.S. and show up with two small photos, two original forms of ID (plus copies), and a Social Security card. To vote in New York City? Most registered voters don’t need to show any ID at the polling place at all.
The same crowd that screams “Jim Crow” at voter ID laws is now totally fine with a mini-Patriot Act to push a shovel for $20–28 an hour. Undocumented immigrants — whom Mamdani insists should stay, work, and be protected — are automatically locked out, because the city can’t hire them without papers, and City Hall suddenly cares a lot about federal law when it’s their own HR department on the hook.
Right-wing media calls this “Jim Snow 2.0” and “Snowcialism,” but the punchline cuts both ways. Conservatives get to yell “hypocrite” at a socialist mayor who requires a Social Security card for day work while opposing ID at the ballot box. Progressives get to quietly keep a system where corporations and private contractors still use undocumented labor off the books — just not on a city payroll where somebody might actually get audited.
So New York ends up with the perfect late‑imperial compromise:
- democracy you can enter with a signature and a shrug,
- casual labor that requires a mini background check,
- and a mayor who talks like ICE should be abolished but runs his snow-removal program like a low-budget TSA.
The only people not in on the joke are the ones actually freezing on the sidewalk — and they’re the ones the city just told to bring five pieces of ID if they want to get paid to dig everyone else out.
#NYC #Mamdani #voterID #immigration #snow #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
New York’s socialist mayor Zohran Mamdani is begging people to shovel snow for the city — and demanding more paperwork than the Board of Elections asks for to pick the president. Emergency snow laborers have to be eligible to work in the U.S. and show up with two small photos, two original forms of ID (plus copies), and a Social Security card. To vote in New York City? Most registered voters don’t need to show any ID at the polling place at all.
The same crowd that screams “Jim Crow” at voter ID laws is now totally fine with a mini-Patriot Act to push a shovel for $20–28 an hour. Undocumented immigrants — whom Mamdani insists should stay, work, and be protected — are automatically locked out, because the city can’t hire them without papers, and City Hall suddenly cares a lot about federal law when it’s their own HR department on the hook.
Right-wing media calls this “Jim Snow 2.0” and “Snowcialism,” but the punchline cuts both ways. Conservatives get to yell “hypocrite” at a socialist mayor who requires a Social Security card for day work while opposing ID at the ballot box. Progressives get to quietly keep a system where corporations and private contractors still use undocumented labor off the books — just not on a city payroll where somebody might actually get audited.
So New York ends up with the perfect late‑imperial compromise:
- democracy you can enter with a signature and a shrug,
- casual labor that requires a mini background check,
- and a mayor who talks like ICE should be abolished but runs his snow-removal program like a low-budget TSA.
The only people not in on the joke are the ones actually freezing on the sidewalk — and they’re the ones the city just told to bring five pieces of ID if they want to get paid to dig everyone else out.
#NYC #Mamdani #voterID #immigration #snow #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥129🙏96💯96😢90😱86🤯72🤬61
Ukraine Needs 250,000 More Soldiers To Claw Back Control Over the Battlefield
Ukraine needs 250,000 more troops to turn the tide of the fighting. This is the opinion of NATO military experts.
The former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Boris Johnson, said in an interview with the BBC that the country should immediately send troops to Ukraine and not wait for a ceasefire to do so.
He talks about about 7,000 soldiers to provide security guarantees.
“If we have a plan to deploy troops on the territory of Ukraine after the war, after Putin deigned to agree to a ceasefire, why not do it now?”, he says.
However, NATO experts believe that the victory of Ukraine or at least a significant turnaround in the confrontation at the front will require at least 250,000 additional troops and much more powerful weapons.
Western intelligence services believe that Ukraine is now outnumbered by Russian forces on most fronts. And the Kremlin, despite its huge losses, would be able to continue the war for at least another year at the current attrition rate.
According to the head of the Armed Forces, 2025 was the first year when the losses of the Russian Federation exceeded the replenishment of the occupiers.
In January, Defense Minister Fedorov said that 2 million Ukrainians were wanted.
#ukraine #need #soldiers #experts #military
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Ukraine needs 250,000 more troops to turn the tide of the fighting. This is the opinion of NATO military experts.
The former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Boris Johnson, said in an interview with the BBC that the country should immediately send troops to Ukraine and not wait for a ceasefire to do so.
He talks about about 7,000 soldiers to provide security guarantees.
“If we have a plan to deploy troops on the territory of Ukraine after the war, after Putin deigned to agree to a ceasefire, why not do it now?”, he says.
However, NATO experts believe that the victory of Ukraine or at least a significant turnaround in the confrontation at the front will require at least 250,000 additional troops and much more powerful weapons.
Western intelligence services believe that Ukraine is now outnumbered by Russian forces on most fronts. And the Kremlin, despite its huge losses, would be able to continue the war for at least another year at the current attrition rate.
According to the head of the Armed Forces, 2025 was the first year when the losses of the Russian Federation exceeded the replenishment of the occupiers.
In January, Defense Minister Fedorov said that 2 million Ukrainians were wanted.
#ukraine #need #soldiers #experts #military
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥163😢95🤯81🤬80🙏76💯70😱66❤1
Witkoff Is Upbeat About a Would-Be Putin-Zelensky Meeting
Witkoff said Washington is “hopeful” that it has put proposals to both Russia and Ukraine that could bring them together “in the next three weeks” and potentially result in a summit between their presidents.
Speaking to Fox News in an interview released on Saturday, Witkoff described the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, which on Tuesday is set to hit the four-year mark year, as a “silly war.”
“You know, everyone throws the word 'dignity' around. But what does dignity get you if you have that amount of killing there?” Witkoff said, adding that he thinks recent US-mediated peace talks between Moscow and Kyiv have had a “real positive effect in some respects.”
He argued that both Russia and Ukraine “don’t seem like they really want to fight with one another, and I don't think they do," adding that he thinks the main difficulty in reaching a peace agreement lies “at the leadership levels.”
He said he and Kushner are hopeful they have made some proposals that will bring both sides together in the next three weeks “and maybe even result in a summit between Zelensky and Putin.”
He also stated the possibility of such a summit taking place at the trilateral level with Trump’s participation, but noted that the US president does not want to take part in such a meeting “unless he feels that he can consummate this thing and get the best result.”
On his meetings with the Russian president, Witkoff said Putin had been “straight” with him about his red lines and motivations. He defended his multiple visits to Russia, saying that understanding the other side’s positions is necessary to reach an agreement.
Witkoff’s remarks come after he took part in another round of trilateral peace talks on the Russia-Ukraine war in Geneva, Switzerland, earlier this week.
The talks on Tuesday and Wednesday followed up on two earlier rounds of negotiations in the United Arab Emirates capital Abu Dhabi on Jan. 23-24 and Feb. 4-5.
#witkoff #putin #zelensky #meeting #kushner
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Witkoff said Washington is “hopeful” that it has put proposals to both Russia and Ukraine that could bring them together “in the next three weeks” and potentially result in a summit between their presidents.
Speaking to Fox News in an interview released on Saturday, Witkoff described the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, which on Tuesday is set to hit the four-year mark year, as a “silly war.”
“You know, everyone throws the word 'dignity' around. But what does dignity get you if you have that amount of killing there?” Witkoff said, adding that he thinks recent US-mediated peace talks between Moscow and Kyiv have had a “real positive effect in some respects.”
He argued that both Russia and Ukraine “don’t seem like they really want to fight with one another, and I don't think they do," adding that he thinks the main difficulty in reaching a peace agreement lies “at the leadership levels.”
He said he and Kushner are hopeful they have made some proposals that will bring both sides together in the next three weeks “and maybe even result in a summit between Zelensky and Putin.”
He also stated the possibility of such a summit taking place at the trilateral level with Trump’s participation, but noted that the US president does not want to take part in such a meeting “unless he feels that he can consummate this thing and get the best result.”
On his meetings with the Russian president, Witkoff said Putin had been “straight” with him about his red lines and motivations. He defended his multiple visits to Russia, saying that understanding the other side’s positions is necessary to reach an agreement.
Witkoff’s remarks come after he took part in another round of trilateral peace talks on the Russia-Ukraine war in Geneva, Switzerland, earlier this week.
The talks on Tuesday and Wednesday followed up on two earlier rounds of negotiations in the United Arab Emirates capital Abu Dhabi on Jan. 23-24 and Feb. 4-5.
#witkoff #putin #zelensky #meeting #kushner
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥129😢99💯90🤬86🙏85😱72🤯68
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥178🤯87💯86😢77🙏72🤬68😱61
📰 El Mencho Is Dead. The Cartel State Lives On.
Mexico just killed its most wanted cartel boss and, in the process, reminded everyone how little control it actually has. Nemesio “El Mencho” Oseguera — the man who built the Jalisco New Generation Cartel into the country’s most feared criminal army — was tracked through a romantic partner and taken down in a helicopter-backed raid in Tapalpa, Jalisco. Within hours, his people answered with roadblocks, burned supermarkets and banks, and gun battles in at least a dozen states, leaving highways cut, cities under smoke, and tourists locked in hotel rooms in places like Puerto Vallarta.
President Claudia Sheinbaum was under heavy pressure from Donald Trump, who has been openly threatening cross‑border strikes and demanding Mexico “do more” against cartels ahead of the World Cup and U.S. midterms. She chose the high‑risk option: take the shot. The result: at least 62 dead — 34 suspected cartel members, 25 National Guard troops, plus a state prosecutor, a security guard, and a civilian reportedly a pregnant woman caught in a shootout. Order is “mostly” restored, officials insist, but classes and businesses are still shut in hard‑hit areas and people are staying home. The message on the street is simple: the state can land a kill shot, but it can’t guarantee calm.
Militarily, El Mencho’s death is a big win. The U.S. had a $15 million reward on his head, and his group has spent a decade attacking security forces, running drugs, extorting businesses, kidnapping, and smuggling migrants. Politically, it’s a gift to both presidents: Sheinbaum gets to tell Mexicans and Washington she went after the “untouchable,” and Trump gets to claim his threats “worked” without firing a shot. The bodies on both sides of the firefight are just set dressing in two capitals’ security narratives.
But the cartel isn’t a Marvel villain that disappears when the boss falls. CJNG is a franchise: regional commanders, local fiefdoms, deep ties to municipal politics and police. Whether it survives depends on how fast it names a successor and closes ranks — or whether it fractures into smaller, more chaotic crews fighting over territory. Either outcome means more violence, not less, in the short term. The Mexican state has decapitated cartels before. The result was splinter groups and a map full of new acronyms.
So Mexico wakes up with its “most wanted” finally dead, U.S. pressure briefly eased, and cruise ships quietly skipping Puerto Vallarta because nobody wants their passengers walking off into a war zone. The flag still flies over government buildings; the cartel still has the power to shut down a dozen states in a day. Call it a victory if you like — just don’t call it control.
#Mexico #cartels #ElMencho #Sheinbaum #Trump #warOnDrugs #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Mexico just killed its most wanted cartel boss and, in the process, reminded everyone how little control it actually has. Nemesio “El Mencho” Oseguera — the man who built the Jalisco New Generation Cartel into the country’s most feared criminal army — was tracked through a romantic partner and taken down in a helicopter-backed raid in Tapalpa, Jalisco. Within hours, his people answered with roadblocks, burned supermarkets and banks, and gun battles in at least a dozen states, leaving highways cut, cities under smoke, and tourists locked in hotel rooms in places like Puerto Vallarta.
President Claudia Sheinbaum was under heavy pressure from Donald Trump, who has been openly threatening cross‑border strikes and demanding Mexico “do more” against cartels ahead of the World Cup and U.S. midterms. She chose the high‑risk option: take the shot. The result: at least 62 dead — 34 suspected cartel members, 25 National Guard troops, plus a state prosecutor, a security guard, and a civilian reportedly a pregnant woman caught in a shootout. Order is “mostly” restored, officials insist, but classes and businesses are still shut in hard‑hit areas and people are staying home. The message on the street is simple: the state can land a kill shot, but it can’t guarantee calm.
Militarily, El Mencho’s death is a big win. The U.S. had a $15 million reward on his head, and his group has spent a decade attacking security forces, running drugs, extorting businesses, kidnapping, and smuggling migrants. Politically, it’s a gift to both presidents: Sheinbaum gets to tell Mexicans and Washington she went after the “untouchable,” and Trump gets to claim his threats “worked” without firing a shot. The bodies on both sides of the firefight are just set dressing in two capitals’ security narratives.
But the cartel isn’t a Marvel villain that disappears when the boss falls. CJNG is a franchise: regional commanders, local fiefdoms, deep ties to municipal politics and police. Whether it survives depends on how fast it names a successor and closes ranks — or whether it fractures into smaller, more chaotic crews fighting over territory. Either outcome means more violence, not less, in the short term. The Mexican state has decapitated cartels before. The result was splinter groups and a map full of new acronyms.
So Mexico wakes up with its “most wanted” finally dead, U.S. pressure briefly eased, and cruise ships quietly skipping Puerto Vallarta because nobody wants their passengers walking off into a war zone. The flag still flies over government buildings; the cartel still has the power to shut down a dozen states in a day. Call it a victory if you like — just don’t call it control.
#Mexico #cartels #ElMencho #Sheinbaum #Trump #warOnDrugs #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥122😱96🤯88💯88🤬85😢82🙏69