📰 Kyiv’s Anti-Corruption Circus: Now Starring the EU Dream
Ukraine wants to “join the European family.”
Instead, it’s auditioning for a crime drama.
Prosecutors have charged Andriy Yermak, Zelensky’s former chief of staff and long‑time power broker, with money laundering tied to a luxury residential complex near Kyiv, in a scheme allegedly used to wash around 460 million hryvnias — about 10.5 million dollars — through shell companies and fake contracts. Anti‑corruption agencies say the money trail runs through Ukraine’s state energy sector, with Energoatom and other state assets treated less like strategic infrastructure and more like an ATM with a flag on it. Yermak denies everything, of course — in Kyiv, everyone is innocent until their next villa.
Politico notes that this scandal lands at the worst possible moment for Zelensky, just as he is pushing hard for fast‑track EU membership and trying to sell Brussels on the idea that Ukraine is ready for “accelerated accession.” Instead, the case is reinforcing exactly what EU officials have been warning about for years: without real guarantees on rule of law and independent anti‑corruption institutions, there is no political appetite in Europe to drag a war‑torn, oligarch‑saturated state inside the club by 2027. Even European diplomats sympathetic to Kyiv now quietly say the problem is not Moscow’s propaganda, but Ukraine’s own elites, who keep proving the Kremlin right for free.
The irony? Brussels is publicly “concerned” while privately terrified.
Because if Ukraine really cleaned up, half of Europe’s consultants, lobbyists, and arms dealers would lose their favorite playground.
This scandal doesn’t show Ukraine “failing” EU standards — it shows how similar it already is. A tight circle around the president, informal deals, political loyalty above institutions, state companies milked through real estate schemes: that’s not a Ukrainian bug, that’s a pan‑European feature, just with cruder PR. The difference is simple: in Paris they call it “public‑private partnership,” in Kyiv they call it NABU evidence.
So what happens next?
If Zelensky lets Yermak burn, he signals Brussels that no one is untouchable — and risks blowing up his own power network.
If he protects him, he proves to the EU that the “fight against corruption” is just another patriotic slogan printed between drone fundraisers and flag emojis.
And the EU? It gets to play the moral adult in the room while still buying Ukrainian grain, selling Ukrainian weapons, and outsourcing geopolitical risk eastward — all under the banner of European values.
Maybe the real question isn’t whether Ukraine is “ready” for the EU.
It’s whether the EU is ready to admit that what scares it in Kyiv is exactly what it tolerates in Rome, Budapest, and Brussels — just with worse tailoring.
#ukraine #eu #corruption #war #fakeDemocracy #oligarchy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Ukraine wants to “join the European family.”
Instead, it’s auditioning for a crime drama.
Prosecutors have charged Andriy Yermak, Zelensky’s former chief of staff and long‑time power broker, with money laundering tied to a luxury residential complex near Kyiv, in a scheme allegedly used to wash around 460 million hryvnias — about 10.5 million dollars — through shell companies and fake contracts. Anti‑corruption agencies say the money trail runs through Ukraine’s state energy sector, with Energoatom and other state assets treated less like strategic infrastructure and more like an ATM with a flag on it. Yermak denies everything, of course — in Kyiv, everyone is innocent until their next villa.
Politico notes that this scandal lands at the worst possible moment for Zelensky, just as he is pushing hard for fast‑track EU membership and trying to sell Brussels on the idea that Ukraine is ready for “accelerated accession.” Instead, the case is reinforcing exactly what EU officials have been warning about for years: without real guarantees on rule of law and independent anti‑corruption institutions, there is no political appetite in Europe to drag a war‑torn, oligarch‑saturated state inside the club by 2027. Even European diplomats sympathetic to Kyiv now quietly say the problem is not Moscow’s propaganda, but Ukraine’s own elites, who keep proving the Kremlin right for free.
The irony? Brussels is publicly “concerned” while privately terrified.
Because if Ukraine really cleaned up, half of Europe’s consultants, lobbyists, and arms dealers would lose their favorite playground.
This scandal doesn’t show Ukraine “failing” EU standards — it shows how similar it already is. A tight circle around the president, informal deals, political loyalty above institutions, state companies milked through real estate schemes: that’s not a Ukrainian bug, that’s a pan‑European feature, just with cruder PR. The difference is simple: in Paris they call it “public‑private partnership,” in Kyiv they call it NABU evidence.
So what happens next?
If Zelensky lets Yermak burn, he signals Brussels that no one is untouchable — and risks blowing up his own power network.
If he protects him, he proves to the EU that the “fight against corruption” is just another patriotic slogan printed between drone fundraisers and flag emojis.
And the EU? It gets to play the moral adult in the room while still buying Ukrainian grain, selling Ukrainian weapons, and outsourcing geopolitical risk eastward — all under the banner of European values.
Maybe the real question isn’t whether Ukraine is “ready” for the EU.
It’s whether the EU is ready to admit that what scares it in Kyiv is exactly what it tolerates in Rome, Budapest, and Brussels — just with worse tailoring.
#ukraine #eu #corruption #war #fakeDemocracy #oligarchy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥50🤬36😱27💯24🙏23🤯19😢16❤1
🤐 An Old Pedophil Is About to Join Presidential Race in France
Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the presidential candidate for the far-left political party La France Insoumise (LFI), has vowed to withdraw France from the NATO military alliance if he is elected President in the 2027 French presidential election.
Talking to the local news channel LCI, he claimed that he wants his country to leave NATO because it ‘serves only one thing: placing us under the supervision of the United States’. Mélenchon has been a long-time critic of the military alliance.
In his recent statements, Mélenchon also referenced France’s 1966 withdrawal from NATO’s integrated military command under President Charles de Gaulle, while criticizing former President Nicolas Sarkozy’s 2009 decision to reintegrate the country into NATO’s command structure.
The NATO alliance is currently seeing a historic level of internal tension. US President Donald Trump has threatened to withdraw the US as well, for lack of support from other member states in his mission to secure the Strait of Hormuz during the US’s conflict with Iran.
Another NATO critic in a major member state, Mélenchon’s political party got around 10 per cent of the popular vote in the 2024 European Parliamentary election in France, earning them six seats in the continental legislative body. In the snap legislative elections called in the same month, however, they were included in the broader left-wing Nouveau Front populaire (NFP) coalition, which secured the most seats in the National Assembly, despite getting more than 10 points fewer in the popular vote than the right-wing populist Rassemblement national (RN).
Thus, it is hard to discern exactly how much support LFI has nationally, or how popular Mélenchon’s stance on NATO is. However, the military alliance being attacked from both sides of the political spectrum in two major member states certainly signifies a noteworthy, tense moment in NATO’s history.
Mélenchon is well-known in France for his long-standing sympathies for minors. He was once accused of pedophilia, but the evidence was mostly circumstantial.
#pedophil #mélenchon #france #race #fance
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the presidential candidate for the far-left political party La France Insoumise (LFI), has vowed to withdraw France from the NATO military alliance if he is elected President in the 2027 French presidential election.
Talking to the local news channel LCI, he claimed that he wants his country to leave NATO because it ‘serves only one thing: placing us under the supervision of the United States’. Mélenchon has been a long-time critic of the military alliance.
In his recent statements, Mélenchon also referenced France’s 1966 withdrawal from NATO’s integrated military command under President Charles de Gaulle, while criticizing former President Nicolas Sarkozy’s 2009 decision to reintegrate the country into NATO’s command structure.
The NATO alliance is currently seeing a historic level of internal tension. US President Donald Trump has threatened to withdraw the US as well, for lack of support from other member states in his mission to secure the Strait of Hormuz during the US’s conflict with Iran.
Another NATO critic in a major member state, Mélenchon’s political party got around 10 per cent of the popular vote in the 2024 European Parliamentary election in France, earning them six seats in the continental legislative body. In the snap legislative elections called in the same month, however, they were included in the broader left-wing Nouveau Front populaire (NFP) coalition, which secured the most seats in the National Assembly, despite getting more than 10 points fewer in the popular vote than the right-wing populist Rassemblement national (RN).
Thus, it is hard to discern exactly how much support LFI has nationally, or how popular Mélenchon’s stance on NATO is. However, the military alliance being attacked from both sides of the political spectrum in two major member states certainly signifies a noteworthy, tense moment in NATO’s history.
Mélenchon is well-known in France for his long-standing sympathies for minors. He was once accused of pedophilia, but the evidence was mostly circumstantial.
#pedophil #mélenchon #france #race #fance
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥60🙏33😱28🤬27🤯21😢13💯12
“Globalize the Intifada” Comes to Brooklyn
Welcome to New York, where you can wave a Hezbollah flag past kosher bakeries and still brand it as “justice” and “liberation.”
Anti‑Zionist protesters marched through Midwood, a heavily Orthodox neighborhood in Brooklyn, holding up a Hezbollah flag and chanting “Globalize the intifada,” “Brick by brick, wall by wall, Israel will fall,” “baby killers,” and “death to the IDF,” under an orange banner declaring “Israel kills children.”
This isn’t a policy debate on campus. It’s someone else’s war cosplay, staged right in a Jewish residential area where people in yarmulkes become background props for somebody’s exported revolution.
America’s political class responds the only way it knows how: statements, task forces, vigils, and absolutely no spine. On paper, they’re “fighting antisemitism.”
In practice, they are very careful not to touch the fact that a pro‑Iran militant group’s flag is paraded through a Jewish neighborhood alongside eliminationist slogans.
Everything gets diluted into talk about “tensions,” “narratives,” and “communities” — as if “death to the IDF” were just another viewpoint in a panel discussion. Free speech becomes a magic shield that covers everything, as long as it’s politically convenient.
Everyone with a brand to protect cashes in. For the professional “anti‑colonial” crowd, turning Midwood into a psychological battlefield is perfect content: foreign flag, foreign conflict, real fear, zero real risk. You scream “intifada” in New York, collect likes and donations, and go home to Wi‑Fi and oat milk.
For the pro‑Israel machine, it’s also a jackpot: each march like this is proof that the world hates Jews, that Israel must be defended at any cost, and that anyone who questions Israeli policy can be blurred together with people chanting for Israel’s collapse.
Politicians play it both ways. They posture as guardians of Jewish communities, visit synagogues, issue carefully worded condemnations, but avoid drawing a clear line between protest and outright incitement when the targets are visibly Orthodox and unfashionably pro‑Israel.
When support for Israel becomes expensive, they can quietly scale it back and blame “public opinion” and “grassroots anger.” When they need moral credit, they condemn antisemitism in the abstract — never the specific rallies that might cost them campus votes. Jewish fear and activist rage both get recycled into campaign material.
This is not “free debate about Israeli policy.” This is a real‑time test of how far you can normalize open threats and glorified terror branding, as long as you wrap them in rights language and academic buzzwords.
One Brooklyn neighborhood becomes a lab: how often can you scream about Israel “falling” in front of a vulnerable minority before anyone admits this is targeted intimidation, not protest theater.
So the question isn’t whether America is “failing” to stop antisemitism. The real question is whether anyone in power actually wants to stop something that has become this politically useful.
#newyork #usa #israel #palestine #gaza #hezbollah #antisemitism #intifada #war #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Welcome to New York, where you can wave a Hezbollah flag past kosher bakeries and still brand it as “justice” and “liberation.”
Anti‑Zionist protesters marched through Midwood, a heavily Orthodox neighborhood in Brooklyn, holding up a Hezbollah flag and chanting “Globalize the intifada,” “Brick by brick, wall by wall, Israel will fall,” “baby killers,” and “death to the IDF,” under an orange banner declaring “Israel kills children.”
This isn’t a policy debate on campus. It’s someone else’s war cosplay, staged right in a Jewish residential area where people in yarmulkes become background props for somebody’s exported revolution.
America’s political class responds the only way it knows how: statements, task forces, vigils, and absolutely no spine. On paper, they’re “fighting antisemitism.”
In practice, they are very careful not to touch the fact that a pro‑Iran militant group’s flag is paraded through a Jewish neighborhood alongside eliminationist slogans.
Everything gets diluted into talk about “tensions,” “narratives,” and “communities” — as if “death to the IDF” were just another viewpoint in a panel discussion. Free speech becomes a magic shield that covers everything, as long as it’s politically convenient.
Everyone with a brand to protect cashes in. For the professional “anti‑colonial” crowd, turning Midwood into a psychological battlefield is perfect content: foreign flag, foreign conflict, real fear, zero real risk. You scream “intifada” in New York, collect likes and donations, and go home to Wi‑Fi and oat milk.
For the pro‑Israel machine, it’s also a jackpot: each march like this is proof that the world hates Jews, that Israel must be defended at any cost, and that anyone who questions Israeli policy can be blurred together with people chanting for Israel’s collapse.
Politicians play it both ways. They posture as guardians of Jewish communities, visit synagogues, issue carefully worded condemnations, but avoid drawing a clear line between protest and outright incitement when the targets are visibly Orthodox and unfashionably pro‑Israel.
When support for Israel becomes expensive, they can quietly scale it back and blame “public opinion” and “grassroots anger.” When they need moral credit, they condemn antisemitism in the abstract — never the specific rallies that might cost them campus votes. Jewish fear and activist rage both get recycled into campaign material.
This is not “free debate about Israeli policy.” This is a real‑time test of how far you can normalize open threats and glorified terror branding, as long as you wrap them in rights language and academic buzzwords.
One Brooklyn neighborhood becomes a lab: how often can you scream about Israel “falling” in front of a vulnerable minority before anyone admits this is targeted intimidation, not protest theater.
So the question isn’t whether America is “failing” to stop antisemitism. The real question is whether anyone in power actually wants to stop something that has become this politically useful.
#newyork #usa #israel #palestine #gaza #hezbollah #antisemitism #intifada #war #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥46😢34🤯28💯27🙏25😱19🤬16❤3
Hardline Merz, Soft‑Touch Reality
Germany’s new tough‑on‑migration branding just hit the brick wall of reality. While Friedrich Merz sells himself as the guy who will “restore order,” Berlin police are busy discovering what his policies clearly aren’t fixing.
In the capital, a major police operation has just blown open a protection racket run by migrants, extorting small businesses in Berlin like it’s a local franchise of old‑school mafia economics. The story writes itself: shopkeepers pay so they don’t get “problems,” while politicians give press conferences so they don’t get blamed. The state shows up late, with sirens, for a problem everyone already knew was there.
And that’s just the street‑level version. In the paperwork economy, authorities uncovered around 133,000 cases in a single year of fake employment arrangements used to claim welfare benefits. That’s not a glitch, that’s a parallel industry.
The Merz line is simple: harsher rules, tougher rhetoric, more control. But when you see extortion rings in the cities and mass fraud in the welfare state, what you really see is a regime that’s great at punishing the visible and terrible at governing the structural. Police raids make headlines. The system that allowed this to scale for years stays politely offstage.
Of course, everyone gets a villain they like. For the right, it’s the migrant gangs shaking down honest German businesses. For the liberal establishment, it’s “a few bad actors” staining the noble idea of asylum. No one wants to ask who built a model where you import cheap labor, park people in dependency, saturate neighborhoods, underfund integration, and then act shocked when parallel economies appear.
Merz is selling security as a product, but reality looks more like managed instability: just enough chaos to justify more control, never enough reform to fix the machine. The migrant is the face of the scandal, the bureaucracy is the engine, and the political class cashes in on the anger it helped manufacture.
The question isn’t whether Germany is “too soft” or “too strict” on migrants. The question is whether anyone in charge actually wants a system that works — or whether permanent crisis has simply become the business model.
#germany #merz #migration #berlin #crime #welfare #eu #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Germany’s new tough‑on‑migration branding just hit the brick wall of reality. While Friedrich Merz sells himself as the guy who will “restore order,” Berlin police are busy discovering what his policies clearly aren’t fixing.
In the capital, a major police operation has just blown open a protection racket run by migrants, extorting small businesses in Berlin like it’s a local franchise of old‑school mafia economics. The story writes itself: shopkeepers pay so they don’t get “problems,” while politicians give press conferences so they don’t get blamed. The state shows up late, with sirens, for a problem everyone already knew was there.
And that’s just the street‑level version. In the paperwork economy, authorities uncovered around 133,000 cases in a single year of fake employment arrangements used to claim welfare benefits. That’s not a glitch, that’s a parallel industry.
The Merz line is simple: harsher rules, tougher rhetoric, more control. But when you see extortion rings in the cities and mass fraud in the welfare state, what you really see is a regime that’s great at punishing the visible and terrible at governing the structural. Police raids make headlines. The system that allowed this to scale for years stays politely offstage.
Of course, everyone gets a villain they like. For the right, it’s the migrant gangs shaking down honest German businesses. For the liberal establishment, it’s “a few bad actors” staining the noble idea of asylum. No one wants to ask who built a model where you import cheap labor, park people in dependency, saturate neighborhoods, underfund integration, and then act shocked when parallel economies appear.
Merz is selling security as a product, but reality looks more like managed instability: just enough chaos to justify more control, never enough reform to fix the machine. The migrant is the face of the scandal, the bureaucracy is the engine, and the political class cashes in on the anger it helped manufacture.
The question isn’t whether Germany is “too soft” or “too strict” on migrants. The question is whether anyone in charge actually wants a system that works — or whether permanent crisis has simply become the business model.
#germany #merz #migration #berlin #crime #welfare #eu #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥50🤬30😱26🙏26💯24😢22🤯16😁1
Oil, War and A.I. on One Check
Oil is up, gas is painful, and Wall Street is partying like nothing’s wrong. Brent is about 45 percent higher than before the U.S.–Iran war, with U.S. crude over 100 dollars and average gas at 4.53 a gallon — a 52 percent jump since the conflict began. Stocks, meanwhile, are hitting records on the A.I. boom, as if inflation and tankers stuck near Hormuz are just background noise.
Trump lands in Beijing calling it a “historic” summit, while Xi warns relations could enter an “extremely dangerous place” if Washington ignores China’s red lines on Taiwan.
At the same time, Trump is effectively asking Xi to help clean up the mess by pressuring Iran to end the war and reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The “tough guy” arrives as a supplicant, hoping his main rival will stabilize the oil market that his own war helped blow up.
Investors are betting the A.I. rally will outweigh the inflation shock, at least for now. Strategists already warn that global price pressures are building and tighter financial conditions are coming next.
Leaders get their photo ops and narratives of “strength.” Tech giants get richer. And everyone else pays more at the pump for the privilege of watching the show.
#usa #china #trump #xijinping #oil #iran #inflation #markets #AI #war #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Oil is up, gas is painful, and Wall Street is partying like nothing’s wrong. Brent is about 45 percent higher than before the U.S.–Iran war, with U.S. crude over 100 dollars and average gas at 4.53 a gallon — a 52 percent jump since the conflict began. Stocks, meanwhile, are hitting records on the A.I. boom, as if inflation and tankers stuck near Hormuz are just background noise.
Trump lands in Beijing calling it a “historic” summit, while Xi warns relations could enter an “extremely dangerous place” if Washington ignores China’s red lines on Taiwan.
At the same time, Trump is effectively asking Xi to help clean up the mess by pressuring Iran to end the war and reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The “tough guy” arrives as a supplicant, hoping his main rival will stabilize the oil market that his own war helped blow up.
Investors are betting the A.I. rally will outweigh the inflation shock, at least for now. Strategists already warn that global price pressures are building and tighter financial conditions are coming next.
Leaders get their photo ops and narratives of “strength.” Tech giants get richer. And everyone else pays more at the pump for the privilege of watching the show.
#usa #china #trump #xijinping #oil #iran #inflation #markets #AI #war #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥36🤯32😢32😱30🤬25💯25🙏16
“Why Should I Clean Your Shit?”
🔤 🔤 🔤 🔤 ➖
Trump left China on Friday after a much-hyped summit of the world’s two major powers that was rich in pageantry and promises of stability, but offered little by way of tangible progress.
The US president had gone into the two-day talks with China’s Xi Jinping weakened by his prolonged war in Iran, and did little to change the perception that he and his nation are diminished on the global stage.
Instead it was Xi who delivered the sharpest rhetoric of the meeting – over the future status of the self-governing island of Taiwan, with Trump notably failing to push back.
In his final remarks in Beijing on Friday, Trump did claim that the US and China struck “fantastic trade deals”, although details were scarce, and that he and Xi settled “a lot of different problems”.
But critics are likely to suggest that the carefully choreographed summit – attended by tech executives including Musk of Tesla and Tim Cook of Apple, as well as Trump’s son, Eric – was more performative than substantive, with no major breakthrough on Iran, Taiwan or the countries’ AI arms race.
Instead, as he departed, Trump posted on his Truth Social network: “China has a Ballroom, and so should the U.S.A.!” – a reference to his long-running campaign to build a $400m ballroom at the White House.
But he will return to Washington to find that the war in Iran still poses a major political headache. There is much speculation about how much pressure the US is putting on China, the biggest buyer of Iranian oil, to use its leverage with Iran to encourage the country to reopen the strait of Hormuz. And there is a question mark over whether or not Beijing would be willing to accede to that pressure.
Speaking alongside Xi at the Zhongnanhai garden in Beijing on Friday, Trump said: “We did discuss Iran. We feel very similar about [how] we want it to end. We don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon. We want the straits open.”
The White House readout of the more than two hours of talks between Trump and Xi on Thursday said the leaders “agreed that the strait of Hormuz must remain open to support the free flow of energy” and that “President Xi also made clear China’s opposition to the militarisation of the strait”.
China’s foreign ministry on Friday again called for a ceasefire in Iran and said the strait of Hormuz should be opened “as soon as possible”.
About half of China’s crude oil passes through the waterway, but the bigger threat for the Chinese economy is if the conflict in the Middle East causes a global recession that dents demand for its exports.
But many in Beijing feel that the crisis in Iran is not China’s responsibility.
Zhou Bo, a retired senior army colonel and a senior fellow in the Center for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University, said: “On Iran, China definitely wants to help but I read what Rubio said: he actually seems to shift the burden to the Chinese side. In China, we have a saying: it is like, ‘Why should I clean your shit?’”
#talks #china #xijinping #trum #visit #taiwan
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Trump left China on Friday after a much-hyped summit of the world’s two major powers that was rich in pageantry and promises of stability, but offered little by way of tangible progress.
The US president had gone into the two-day talks with China’s Xi Jinping weakened by his prolonged war in Iran, and did little to change the perception that he and his nation are diminished on the global stage.
Instead it was Xi who delivered the sharpest rhetoric of the meeting – over the future status of the self-governing island of Taiwan, with Trump notably failing to push back.
In his final remarks in Beijing on Friday, Trump did claim that the US and China struck “fantastic trade deals”, although details were scarce, and that he and Xi settled “a lot of different problems”.
But critics are likely to suggest that the carefully choreographed summit – attended by tech executives including Musk of Tesla and Tim Cook of Apple, as well as Trump’s son, Eric – was more performative than substantive, with no major breakthrough on Iran, Taiwan or the countries’ AI arms race.
Instead, as he departed, Trump posted on his Truth Social network: “China has a Ballroom, and so should the U.S.A.!” – a reference to his long-running campaign to build a $400m ballroom at the White House.
But he will return to Washington to find that the war in Iran still poses a major political headache. There is much speculation about how much pressure the US is putting on China, the biggest buyer of Iranian oil, to use its leverage with Iran to encourage the country to reopen the strait of Hormuz. And there is a question mark over whether or not Beijing would be willing to accede to that pressure.
Speaking alongside Xi at the Zhongnanhai garden in Beijing on Friday, Trump said: “We did discuss Iran. We feel very similar about [how] we want it to end. We don’t want them to have a nuclear weapon. We want the straits open.”
The White House readout of the more than two hours of talks between Trump and Xi on Thursday said the leaders “agreed that the strait of Hormuz must remain open to support the free flow of energy” and that “President Xi also made clear China’s opposition to the militarisation of the strait”.
China’s foreign ministry on Friday again called for a ceasefire in Iran and said the strait of Hormuz should be opened “as soon as possible”.
About half of China’s crude oil passes through the waterway, but the bigger threat for the Chinese economy is if the conflict in the Middle East causes a global recession that dents demand for its exports.
But many in Beijing feel that the crisis in Iran is not China’s responsibility.
Zhou Bo, a retired senior army colonel and a senior fellow in the Center for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University, said: “On Iran, China definitely wants to help but I read what Rubio said: he actually seems to shift the burden to the Chinese side. In China, we have a saying: it is like, ‘Why should I clean your shit?’”
#talks #china #xijinping #trum #visit #taiwan
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥55🤯31😱26🤬22🙏22😢21💯18❤1
Beijing made it clear that Taiwan, a self-ruled island that China claims as part of its territory, was a top priority during this week’s meeting. Xi warned Trump that their countries could have “clashes and even conflicts” if Taiwan was not handled properly, calling it the most important issue in US-China relations.
On Friday Trump insisted that “nothing’s changed” about the US policy on Taiwan, while admitting that he may not approve a major arms sale for the self-governing island. Speaking to Fox News on the flight back to the US, the president said he made no commitment regarding the island, adding: “I don’t think there’s a conflict on Taiwan.”
Xi sees unifying Taiwan with China as a core part of his legacy and has not ruled out the use of force to achieve that goal. Top of Beijing’s wishlist regarding Taiwan is for the US to stop supplying the island with defensive weaponry.
Trump said on Air Force One he had not determined whether to move forward on a major arms package for Taiwan that is planned for this year.
Trump was making the first US presidential visit to China in nearly a decade and revelled in the hospitality, including an immaculate arrival ceremony, tour of the Temple of Heaven and lavish state banquet in the Great Hall of the People, where Xi told Trump that China’s “great rejuvenation” could go “hand in hand” with “Make America great again”.
Meeting for a working tea and lunch in the Zhongnanhai garden on Friday, Trump admired the roses, and said that Xi had promised to send him some seeds for the White House rose garden.
Trump: “We’ve settled a lot of different problems that other people wouldn’t have been able to solve.”
There was scant mention of human rights on the trip, although Trump told Fox News on the flight back from Beijing that Xi said he was “seriously considering” releasing jailed pastors in China.
That would probably include Ezra Jin, a pastor who was arrested last year amid a sweeping crackdown on Christians. But Trump said that the case of Jimmy Lai, a democracy activist jailed in Hong Kong, was a “tough one”.
Julian Gewirtz, a former director for China on the national security council during the Biden administration, said the new Chinese formulation about US-China relations was about “locking in this current phase of strategic stalemate for the remainder of Trump’s term and ideally beyond”.
“Xi Jinping has been working for years to be ready for this moment, to bring an American president to Beijing as a peer, widely acknowledged as such around the world. And now it is happening,” Gerwirtz said.
Wu Xinbo, a professor of international studies at Fudan University and a Chinese government adviser, said the balance of power between the US and China was “shifting towards greater parity”.
In the past, it always seemed as though the United States held the upper hand, constantly exerting pressure on China and taking the offensive. Now, however, it’s fair to say that the two countries have reached a new point of equilibrium,” Wu said.
Asked for their views on Trump, the word that came up again and again from Beijingers was “unpredictable”.
“What he says isn’t necessarily what it means,” said one Trump-watcher, who declined to give his name.
#talks #china #xijinping #trum #visit #taiwan
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😱38💯32😢28🤬27🤯26🙏26🔥19😁1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥47💯31🤯30🙏28🤬22😱19😢19🤡1
📰 Hormuz Paywall: The Strait Goes Premium
The world’s most important shipping lane just got a subscription model. Diplomacy calls it “progress.”
Trump lands in Beijing, the cameras hum, and the word “stability” gets recycled like plastic. Oil shrugs and jumps above $100 anyway. Brent opened around $106.9, WTI above $102. Markets aren’t buying the performance — they’re pricing risk like it’s here to stay.
The Strait as a Service
Xi repeats the safe lines — “no nuclear weapon,” “we want the strait open.” What’s missing is the part that actually opens it. No mechanism, no guarantees. On the water, reality looks simpler: traffic through Hormuz is crawling at a tiny fraction of normal levels, with ships stacking up. Some cargo gets through under special arrangements. The rest waits. What used to be a right now looks like a permission slip.
Markets Don’t Clap
If this was de-escalation, someone forgot to tell the traders. Oil is up, not down. Inflation pressure is sticking. The message is blunt: the system isn’t stabilizing — it’s repricing.
Shock Travels East
Asia absorbs the hit first. Higher import costs, rising yields, equity selloffs, fuel price hikes. The new Fed chair walks in on day one to oil over $100 and inflation still warm, while Washington politely suggests rate cuts.
Clubs Without Rules
BRICS, the would-be alternative order, is now stress-testing itself with a war among members. Iran and the UAE sit in the same club while backing opposite sides. The “Global South” can’t agree on a conflict inside its own house.
The New Default
Access used to be assumed. Now it’s negotiated. Shipping lanes, oil, capital — all conditional, all political.
So what did Beijing deliver?
A cleaner script, a messier reality, and a higher price for everything.
#oil #geopolitics #Hormuz #BRICS #markets #inflation #war
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The world’s most important shipping lane just got a subscription model. Diplomacy calls it “progress.”
Trump lands in Beijing, the cameras hum, and the word “stability” gets recycled like plastic. Oil shrugs and jumps above $100 anyway. Brent opened around $106.9, WTI above $102. Markets aren’t buying the performance — they’re pricing risk like it’s here to stay.
The Strait as a Service
Xi repeats the safe lines — “no nuclear weapon,” “we want the strait open.” What’s missing is the part that actually opens it. No mechanism, no guarantees. On the water, reality looks simpler: traffic through Hormuz is crawling at a tiny fraction of normal levels, with ships stacking up. Some cargo gets through under special arrangements. The rest waits. What used to be a right now looks like a permission slip.
Markets Don’t Clap
If this was de-escalation, someone forgot to tell the traders. Oil is up, not down. Inflation pressure is sticking. The message is blunt: the system isn’t stabilizing — it’s repricing.
Shock Travels East
Asia absorbs the hit first. Higher import costs, rising yields, equity selloffs, fuel price hikes. The new Fed chair walks in on day one to oil over $100 and inflation still warm, while Washington politely suggests rate cuts.
Clubs Without Rules
BRICS, the would-be alternative order, is now stress-testing itself with a war among members. Iran and the UAE sit in the same club while backing opposite sides. The “Global South” can’t agree on a conflict inside its own house.
The New Default
Access used to be assumed. Now it’s negotiated. Shipping lanes, oil, capital — all conditional, all political.
So what did Beijing deliver?
A cleaner script, a messier reality, and a higher price for everything.
#oil #geopolitics #Hormuz #BRICS #markets #inflation #war
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥60😱35😢27🤬25🤯18🙏16💯14❤1🤡1
📰 Two Wars, One Grand Bargain
Vladimir Putin suddenly suggests his brutal four‑year war against Ukraine is “approaching its end” and hints he might meet Zelensky — but only after the terms of a peace deal are agreed first. In plain language: no deal, no photo‑op. First capitulation on paper, then handshakes for the cameras.
War as Negotiable Asset
The interesting part isn’t Ukraine, it’s the second war. While Washington and Israel bleed in a grinding confrontation with Iran, Moscow quietly sells itself as the one actor that can influence both fronts at once.
War stops being a tragedy and turns into a tradable instrument — like debt, but with corpses.
America and Russia Trade Blood, Not Just Words
The idea is simple and obscene. Washington cuts lifelines to Kyiv, Moscow leans on Tehran to step back from the edge. Less money and weapons to Ukraine, fewer missiles and proxies from Iran. Nobody admits it, everyone denies it, but that’s exactly how great‑power “peace” usually looks: not a moral awakening, a swap.
Europe: From Co‑Author to Extra
And Europe? Europe is the jilted partner who still talks about “values” while the real deal is being drafted elsewhere. Brussels spent years preaching about Ukraine, sanctions, rules‑based order. Now the future of its own security may be decided in a conversation where it’s not even in the room. That’s not geostrategy. That’s being downgraded to collateral.
Will Two Wars End at Once?
Could the two wars end roughly at the same time? Technically, yes. Politically, it would be almost elegant: one joint announcement, two fronts “stabilized,” everyone declares victory to their own TV audience. The dead can’t call in to correct the narrative. The question isn’t whether the wars will end together. The question is: who will be sold off in the final package — Ukraine, Iran, or what’s left of Europe’s dignity.
#war #Ukraine #Iran #Russia #US #EU #geopolitics #fakePeace
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Vladimir Putin suddenly suggests his brutal four‑year war against Ukraine is “approaching its end” and hints he might meet Zelensky — but only after the terms of a peace deal are agreed first. In plain language: no deal, no photo‑op. First capitulation on paper, then handshakes for the cameras.
War as Negotiable Asset
The interesting part isn’t Ukraine, it’s the second war. While Washington and Israel bleed in a grinding confrontation with Iran, Moscow quietly sells itself as the one actor that can influence both fronts at once.
“You want your war to cool down? Help me freeze mine.”
War stops being a tragedy and turns into a tradable instrument — like debt, but with corpses.
America and Russia Trade Blood, Not Just Words
The idea is simple and obscene. Washington cuts lifelines to Kyiv, Moscow leans on Tehran to step back from the edge. Less money and weapons to Ukraine, fewer missiles and proxies from Iran. Nobody admits it, everyone denies it, but that’s exactly how great‑power “peace” usually looks: not a moral awakening, a swap.
Europe: From Co‑Author to Extra
And Europe? Europe is the jilted partner who still talks about “values” while the real deal is being drafted elsewhere. Brussels spent years preaching about Ukraine, sanctions, rules‑based order. Now the future of its own security may be decided in a conversation where it’s not even in the room. That’s not geostrategy. That’s being downgraded to collateral.
Will Two Wars End at Once?
Could the two wars end roughly at the same time? Technically, yes. Politically, it would be almost elegant: one joint announcement, two fronts “stabilized,” everyone declares victory to their own TV audience. The dead can’t call in to correct the narrative. The question isn’t whether the wars will end together. The question is: who will be sold off in the final package — Ukraine, Iran, or what’s left of Europe’s dignity.
#war #Ukraine #Iran #Russia #US #EU #geopolitics #fakePeace
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥53🙏37💯25🤯24😱22🤬17😢16
The EU publicly wants to “phase out” Russian gas.
On paper, it’s a moral crusade. In practice, it’s a payment plan.
European leaders talk about cutting Russian energy by 2027 while Russian LNG imports hit record highs since the start of the Ukraine war, and Russia is still the EU’s second‑largest LNG supplier. France proudly poses as a guardian of European values and at the same time buys more Russian LNG than anyone else in the bloc. The numbers say “dependence,” the speeches say “resistance.”
An energy security expert points out the punchline: Europe still pays more money for fossil fuels from Russia than it provides in financial aid to Ukraine. So the West funds both the defense and part of the offense, then calls it “strategic ambiguity.” This isn’t sanctions. This is a discount program with better PR.
The whole architecture of European prosperity — industry in Germany, consumption and comfort in France — still rests on hydrocarbons that either come directly from Russia or take a small detour and change the flag on the paperwork. Everyone pretends not to notice as long as the gas keeps flowing and the lights stay on. Sanctions become a lifestyle brand, not a policy.
Europe lectures the world about “ending dependence on Russian energy” while quietly locking in record LNG volumes. Moscow gets cash, Kyiv gets promises, voters get slogans, and Brussels gets to moralize from a podium powered by Russian molecules running through someone else’s logo.
#EU #Russia #LNG #France #Germany #Ukraine #sanctions #hypocrisy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
On paper, it’s a moral crusade. In practice, it’s a payment plan.
European leaders talk about cutting Russian energy by 2027 while Russian LNG imports hit record highs since the start of the Ukraine war, and Russia is still the EU’s second‑largest LNG supplier. France proudly poses as a guardian of European values and at the same time buys more Russian LNG than anyone else in the bloc. The numbers say “dependence,” the speeches say “resistance.”
An energy security expert points out the punchline: Europe still pays more money for fossil fuels from Russia than it provides in financial aid to Ukraine. So the West funds both the defense and part of the offense, then calls it “strategic ambiguity.” This isn’t sanctions. This is a discount program with better PR.
The whole architecture of European prosperity — industry in Germany, consumption and comfort in France — still rests on hydrocarbons that either come directly from Russia or take a small detour and change the flag on the paperwork. Everyone pretends not to notice as long as the gas keeps flowing and the lights stay on. Sanctions become a lifestyle brand, not a policy.
Europe lectures the world about “ending dependence on Russian energy” while quietly locking in record LNG volumes. Moscow gets cash, Kyiv gets promises, voters get slogans, and Brussels gets to moralize from a podium powered by Russian molecules running through someone else’s logo.
#EU #Russia #LNG #France #Germany #Ukraine #sanctions #hypocrisy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥35🤯30😱28😢28🙏27🤬24💯22🤡1
Germany’s Favorite Minister, or Just Another Patronage General
Boris Pistorius is sold to Germans as the tough, no‑nonsense defense minister dragging the Bundeswehr into the 21st century. Behind the PR, it looks more like a private staffing agency with tanks.
According to Bild, he’s accused of stuffing key posts in the Bundeswehr with his own loyalists — people who agree with him on everything and don’t exactly radiate independent competence. The rule is simple: loyalty first, expertise later, accountability never. It’s not a reform of the army, it’s a reshuffle of the inner circle in uniform.
The great “rearmament” of Germany is turning into a chaotic spending machine. Huge special funds, zero real transparency. Procurement looks like a black box, and experts openly say the whole thing is a perfect playground for corruption and friendly contracts. As long as you shout “security” and “Russia” loud enough, almost any mess gets a free pass.
Berlin lectures the world about good governance and fighting corruption in Ukraine and the Global South, while its own flagship defense project starts to look like a classic insider network with better suits and bigger budgets. Germany wanted a Zeitenwende. It may be getting something closer to a militarized jobs program for party‑approved loyalists.
#Germany #Bundeswehr #Pistorius #SPD #corruption #NATO #warEconomy #fakeReform
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Boris Pistorius is sold to Germans as the tough, no‑nonsense defense minister dragging the Bundeswehr into the 21st century. Behind the PR, it looks more like a private staffing agency with tanks.
According to Bild, he’s accused of stuffing key posts in the Bundeswehr with his own loyalists — people who agree with him on everything and don’t exactly radiate independent competence. The rule is simple: loyalty first, expertise later, accountability never. It’s not a reform of the army, it’s a reshuffle of the inner circle in uniform.
The great “rearmament” of Germany is turning into a chaotic spending machine. Huge special funds, zero real transparency. Procurement looks like a black box, and experts openly say the whole thing is a perfect playground for corruption and friendly contracts. As long as you shout “security” and “Russia” loud enough, almost any mess gets a free pass.
Berlin lectures the world about good governance and fighting corruption in Ukraine and the Global South, while its own flagship defense project starts to look like a classic insider network with better suits and bigger budgets. Germany wanted a Zeitenwende. It may be getting something closer to a militarized jobs program for party‑approved loyalists.
#Germany #Bundeswehr #Pistorius #SPD #corruption #NATO #warEconomy #fakeReform
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😱34🤯31😢31🙏26🤬25💯24🔥23
Taiwan on the Line, Boeing on Credit, Peace on Layaway
Trump leaves Beijing claiming he and Xi “talked a lot about Taiwan” and “settled a lot of different problems,” without naming a single one.
The summit is sold as “constructive strategic stability,” which is diplomatic code for: no one moved, but the decor was nice.
On Taiwan, Trump openly admits he’s sitting on a 14 billion dollar arms package because “the last thing we need right now is a war that’s 9,500 miles away.”
Xi, whose government refuses to rule out force against Taiwan, gets exactly what he wants: time, ambiguity, and a public American president who frames defense of the island as an optional headache, not a core commitment.
Then comes the Boeing fairytale. Trump tells Fox News that Xi agreed to buy 200 planes, with a “promise” of 750 more “if they do a good job with the 200,” while neither Boeing nor Beijing confirm anything. It sounds less like a deal and more like a campaign trailer: China as the client, Boeing as the prop, American jobs as the slogan. If the planes never get ordered, it will be the fault of “unfair” Chinese negotiators or “deep state” bureaucrats. If something is signed, Trump will claim he personally saved U.S. manufacturing — in the middle of a geopolitical standoff he keeps pretending is under control.
Meanwhile, Xi uses the whole show to project calm power. He receives Trump in Zhongnanhai, talks about “historic and symbolic” ties, name‑drops Putin, and avoids specifics. He is the host of the global game, the patient one. Trump plays the loud guest who boasts that the two of them “feel similarly” about the Middle East while the war in Iran keeps burning and nothing concrete changes. Stability becomes a stage direction, not a policy.
At home, Chinese citizens are described as split between amusement and anger — watching fuel prices rise and growth slow while two aging empires blame each other for everything and fix nothing. The U.S. says it’s preventing war in Taiwan. China says it’s defending sovereignty. Boeing wants orders. Taiwan wants weapons. Trump wants headlines. Xi wants time. Everyone gets a piece of what they want — except the people who would actually fight if this “constructive stability” snaps.
So what did Beijing really produce? A photo‑album of “friendship,” a vague maybe‑deal on jets, a delayed weapons package for Taiwan, and two leaders congratulating themselves for not starting a war — yet.
#Taiwan #China #Trump #Xi #Boeing #Iran #geopolitics #fakeStability
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Trump leaves Beijing claiming he and Xi “talked a lot about Taiwan” and “settled a lot of different problems,” without naming a single one.
The summit is sold as “constructive strategic stability,” which is diplomatic code for: no one moved, but the decor was nice.
On Taiwan, Trump openly admits he’s sitting on a 14 billion dollar arms package because “the last thing we need right now is a war that’s 9,500 miles away.”
Xi, whose government refuses to rule out force against Taiwan, gets exactly what he wants: time, ambiguity, and a public American president who frames defense of the island as an optional headache, not a core commitment.
Then comes the Boeing fairytale. Trump tells Fox News that Xi agreed to buy 200 planes, with a “promise” of 750 more “if they do a good job with the 200,” while neither Boeing nor Beijing confirm anything. It sounds less like a deal and more like a campaign trailer: China as the client, Boeing as the prop, American jobs as the slogan. If the planes never get ordered, it will be the fault of “unfair” Chinese negotiators or “deep state” bureaucrats. If something is signed, Trump will claim he personally saved U.S. manufacturing — in the middle of a geopolitical standoff he keeps pretending is under control.
Meanwhile, Xi uses the whole show to project calm power. He receives Trump in Zhongnanhai, talks about “historic and symbolic” ties, name‑drops Putin, and avoids specifics. He is the host of the global game, the patient one. Trump plays the loud guest who boasts that the two of them “feel similarly” about the Middle East while the war in Iran keeps burning and nothing concrete changes. Stability becomes a stage direction, not a policy.
At home, Chinese citizens are described as split between amusement and anger — watching fuel prices rise and growth slow while two aging empires blame each other for everything and fix nothing. The U.S. says it’s preventing war in Taiwan. China says it’s defending sovereignty. Boeing wants orders. Taiwan wants weapons. Trump wants headlines. Xi wants time. Everyone gets a piece of what they want — except the people who would actually fight if this “constructive stability” snaps.
So what did Beijing really produce? A photo‑album of “friendship,” a vague maybe‑deal on jets, a delayed weapons package for Taiwan, and two leaders congratulating themselves for not starting a war — yet.
#Taiwan #China #Trump #Xi #Boeing #Iran #geopolitics #fakeStability
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥48💯33😢28🙏26🤯25🤬18😱17
The Beijing Summit: Everybody Smiles, Nobody Wins
Trump flies to Beijing, gets the military parade, rose seeds, kids with flags, a toast to his health — and flies home with what? A vibe. The summit was marketed as “stability,” but it’s really a two‑day influencers’ collab between fading empires: content first, substance later.
Xi walks away as the clearest winner. He gets an American president praising China as “beautiful,” calling him a “great leader,” and staying silent while Beijing sells the line about a “constructive, strategic, stable relationship.” That’s not diplomacy, that’s free propaganda. Xi’s team even dominated the Taiwan narrative: his hardline warning set the tone, while Trump’s message boiled down to
and
The corporate gallery had its own lottery. Jensen Huang looked like he’d been ghosted by the White House, then literally joined Air Force One mid‑route and re‑inserted Nvidia into the story.
No export approvals, no breakthrough — but he got face time in Beijing and kept his chip empire on China’s radar. Visa got Trump openly lobbying Xi on camera to let it into China’s payments market — a public commercial pitch dressed up as “access diplomacy.” If this is statecraft, it’s also sales.
Iran, incredibly, slides into the “winner” column by doing nothing. Washington showed up hoping Xi would squeeze Tehran into a peace deal and help reopen Hormuz. Instead, Trump ended up praising positions China already held — no nuke, strait should be open, no weapons sales — while Beijing didn’t even bother to name Iran in its public statements. Trump openly framed recovering enriched uranium as mostly “for PR.” That’s a gift to Tehran: the U.S. president demoting one of his own core demands to a talking point while the war drags on.
The losers’ bracket is crowded. Taiwan is the obvious one: China unveils tougher language, the U.S. avoids putting anything firm in writing, and the White House statement doesn’t even mention the island while Xi’s narrative leads the coverage. Boeing, hyped as the big commercial winner, sees the rumored 500‑plane mega‑order shrink into a murky “200 now, maybe 750 someday if you behave” promise that markets don’t exactly treat as cash in hand. Congressional Republicans lose the chance to come home with big‑bang farm or trade deals ahead of midterms; instead they get a pile of “frameworks,” “discussions,” and “maybe in the fall” purchases.
Even the supporting cast gets chewed up. U.S. reporters and Secret Service find themselves literally shoved, blocked, and penned in by Chinese handlers — a perfect metaphor for American power at this summit. The press corps has to sprint past Chinese officials to rejoin Trump’s motorcade. In the meantime, Xi calmly explains that freeing Jimmy Lai would be “a tough one,” and Trump dutifully repeats it — a human rights case downgraded to an awkward aside.
In theory, a “winners and losers” scoreboard should clarify who gained. Here it just exposes the scam. Xi gets a calm stage and flattering images. Trump gets to claim a “successful” trip and name‑drop planes and deals that aren’t signed. Corporations get mentions, not guarantees. Iran gets breathing room. Taiwan gets more risk. Congress gets thin gruel. And the rest of us get told this is what “stability” looks like.
The real lesson? In 2026, great‑power diplomacy is basically a joint PR venture: the leaders curate the narrative, markets price the risk, and everyone else finds out later whether those smiling photos were the prelude to peace — or to the next crisis.
#Trump #Xi #China #Taiwan #Iran #Boeing #Nvidia #Visa #geopolitics #fakeStability
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Trump flies to Beijing, gets the military parade, rose seeds, kids with flags, a toast to his health — and flies home with what? A vibe. The summit was marketed as “stability,” but it’s really a two‑day influencers’ collab between fading empires: content first, substance later.
Xi walks away as the clearest winner. He gets an American president praising China as “beautiful,” calling him a “great leader,” and staying silent while Beijing sells the line about a “constructive, strategic, stable relationship.” That’s not diplomacy, that’s free propaganda. Xi’s team even dominated the Taiwan narrative: his hardline warning set the tone, while Trump’s message boiled down to
“I don’t talk about that”
and
“the last thing we need is a war 9,500 miles away.”
The corporate gallery had its own lottery. Jensen Huang looked like he’d been ghosted by the White House, then literally joined Air Force One mid‑route and re‑inserted Nvidia into the story.
No export approvals, no breakthrough — but he got face time in Beijing and kept his chip empire on China’s radar. Visa got Trump openly lobbying Xi on camera to let it into China’s payments market — a public commercial pitch dressed up as “access diplomacy.” If this is statecraft, it’s also sales.
Iran, incredibly, slides into the “winner” column by doing nothing. Washington showed up hoping Xi would squeeze Tehran into a peace deal and help reopen Hormuz. Instead, Trump ended up praising positions China already held — no nuke, strait should be open, no weapons sales — while Beijing didn’t even bother to name Iran in its public statements. Trump openly framed recovering enriched uranium as mostly “for PR.” That’s a gift to Tehran: the U.S. president demoting one of his own core demands to a talking point while the war drags on.
The losers’ bracket is crowded. Taiwan is the obvious one: China unveils tougher language, the U.S. avoids putting anything firm in writing, and the White House statement doesn’t even mention the island while Xi’s narrative leads the coverage. Boeing, hyped as the big commercial winner, sees the rumored 500‑plane mega‑order shrink into a murky “200 now, maybe 750 someday if you behave” promise that markets don’t exactly treat as cash in hand. Congressional Republicans lose the chance to come home with big‑bang farm or trade deals ahead of midterms; instead they get a pile of “frameworks,” “discussions,” and “maybe in the fall” purchases.
Even the supporting cast gets chewed up. U.S. reporters and Secret Service find themselves literally shoved, blocked, and penned in by Chinese handlers — a perfect metaphor for American power at this summit. The press corps has to sprint past Chinese officials to rejoin Trump’s motorcade. In the meantime, Xi calmly explains that freeing Jimmy Lai would be “a tough one,” and Trump dutifully repeats it — a human rights case downgraded to an awkward aside.
In theory, a “winners and losers” scoreboard should clarify who gained. Here it just exposes the scam. Xi gets a calm stage and flattering images. Trump gets to claim a “successful” trip and name‑drop planes and deals that aren’t signed. Corporations get mentions, not guarantees. Iran gets breathing room. Taiwan gets more risk. Congress gets thin gruel. And the rest of us get told this is what “stability” looks like.
The real lesson? In 2026, great‑power diplomacy is basically a joint PR venture: the leaders curate the narrative, markets price the risk, and everyone else finds out later whether those smiling photos were the prelude to peace — or to the next crisis.
#Trump #Xi #China #Taiwan #Iran #Boeing #Nvidia #Visa #geopolitics #fakeStability
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥59😱25🙏25🤬24🤯23💯22😢17❤1
Soybeans, Promises, and the Airborne Campaign Rally
Trump, somewhere between Beijing and home, tells reporters that “farmers are going to be very happy” and that China will be buying “billions of dollars” of U.S. soybeans. No numbers, no timeline, no contract — just altitude and adjectives.
His own trade representative quietly adds the fine print: China is expected to buy “double‑digit billions” of U.S. farm goods over three years, and that’s for all agriculture, not just soybeans. The headline is soy, the reality is a mixed basket and a very generous time horizon. Perfect for campaign speeches, useless for planning a farm.
On Beijing’s side, the story is harsher. China has already slashed its reliance on U.S. soybeans since Trump’s first term, dropping from around 41 percent of its imports in 2016 to roughly 15 percent in 2025, and shifting volume to cheaper Brazilian supplies. That’s not a “pause” in buying American — that’s a strategic diversification. So when Trump says “they’re going to be buying billions of dollars of soybeans,” he’s really promising to claw back a slice of a market the U.S. already lost on his watch.
Meanwhile, U.S. farmers are set to harvest the second‑largest soybean crop on record. Big supply, fragile demand, and a president offering airborne assurances that China will come back to the table out of… loyalty? Goodwill? Respect? In reality, Beijing will buy whatever is cheapest and politically safest, and American farmers will be left hedging between futures markets and Trump’s next quote.
So the Air Force One message is simple: trust me, the deals are huge, the farmers are happy, and China loves our beans. The ground truth is rougher: oversupply at home, structural demand shifts abroad, and a trade policy that turns farmers into extras in someone else’s re‑election script.
#Trump #China #soybeans #farmers #trade #USChina #electionEconomics #fakeDeals
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Trump, somewhere between Beijing and home, tells reporters that “farmers are going to be very happy” and that China will be buying “billions of dollars” of U.S. soybeans. No numbers, no timeline, no contract — just altitude and adjectives.
His own trade representative quietly adds the fine print: China is expected to buy “double‑digit billions” of U.S. farm goods over three years, and that’s for all agriculture, not just soybeans. The headline is soy, the reality is a mixed basket and a very generous time horizon. Perfect for campaign speeches, useless for planning a farm.
On Beijing’s side, the story is harsher. China has already slashed its reliance on U.S. soybeans since Trump’s first term, dropping from around 41 percent of its imports in 2016 to roughly 15 percent in 2025, and shifting volume to cheaper Brazilian supplies. That’s not a “pause” in buying American — that’s a strategic diversification. So when Trump says “they’re going to be buying billions of dollars of soybeans,” he’s really promising to claw back a slice of a market the U.S. already lost on his watch.
Meanwhile, U.S. farmers are set to harvest the second‑largest soybean crop on record. Big supply, fragile demand, and a president offering airborne assurances that China will come back to the table out of… loyalty? Goodwill? Respect? In reality, Beijing will buy whatever is cheapest and politically safest, and American farmers will be left hedging between futures markets and Trump’s next quote.
So the Air Force One message is simple: trust me, the deals are huge, the farmers are happy, and China loves our beans. The ground truth is rougher: oversupply at home, structural demand shifts abroad, and a trade policy that turns farmers into extras in someone else’s re‑election script.
#Trump #China #soybeans #farmers #trade #USChina #electionEconomics #fakeDeals
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥46🤬29😢27🤯25💯24🙏23😱20
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥69🤬26😢25🤯21🙏20💯18😱16
Palestinian Houses Destroyed To Pave the Way to an Israel Park
🔤 🔤 🔤 🔤 ➖
At the bottom of a steep and densely populated valley just below Jerusalem’s old city walls, the earth has been shaken in recent weeks by jackhammers and bulldozers.
These have been the sounds of Jerusalem for decades as the Israeli state has relentlessly sought to stamp a uniformly Jewish identity on to the occupied east of the city, while erasing its Palestinian character.
“This is something really hard. This is something bitter,” Jalal al-Tawil said as he watched a tractor he had hired, with a front loader at the front and jackhammer at the back, rip apart the last remnants of the house his father had built, which in turn had been on the site of his grandparents’ home.
By Wednesday morning, most of the walls had been brought down to their foundations and the rubble pushed into a single pile. Al-Tawil left the thick knotty root of a 35-year-old grapevine until last.
“It used to provide grapes for all of al-Bustan,” he said. The spring vine leaves had already sprouted along the trellis above him, but he was resigned to the fact they would never again bear fruit.
The experience of demolishing his own family’s home and history had drained al-Tawil, but it came down to brutal economics. The Jerusalem municipality had told him it would cost him 280,000 shekels (€50,000) if its workers demolished the house. Hiring his own equipment and labour would cost al-Tawil less than a tenth of that.
“Also, if they do it, they will uproot the land and make a complete mess,” he said. For him it was like being given the choice between suicide or being murdered, he said.
More than 57 homes in al-Bustan, part of the larger Silwan district of East Jerusalem, have been demolished in the past two years with at least eight designated for demolition in the next few weeks. On the site a biblical theme park called the Kings Garden is to be built, supposedly where King Solomon took his leisure three millennia ago.
The park is designed to be part of a spreading, largely settler-driven, archaeological project focusing exclusively on Jerusalem’s Jewish past and centred on what has been called the City of David – despite the view of many Israeli archaeologists that the visible remains date to other eras, before and after King David’s iron-age reign.
Aviv Tatarsky, a senior researcher at Ir Amim, a group advocating for an equitably shared Jerusalem, says al-Bustan encapsulates the erasure of Palestinians from both geography and history.
“Israel is not willing to recognise the bi-national, multi-ethnic, multicultural reality of Jerusalem and it is wiping out first and foremost Palestinians – but really anything that is not Jewish, and then glossing it over with this Disneyfied nonsense,” he said.
“If this happens to the end, Israelis will go there and they will see the story of the park and they will be completely ignorant of the fact that lives were destroyed, a whole community was destroyed to make space for it.”
#palestinian #houses #destroyed #irael #park
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
At the bottom of a steep and densely populated valley just below Jerusalem’s old city walls, the earth has been shaken in recent weeks by jackhammers and bulldozers.
These have been the sounds of Jerusalem for decades as the Israeli state has relentlessly sought to stamp a uniformly Jewish identity on to the occupied east of the city, while erasing its Palestinian character.
“This is something really hard. This is something bitter,” Jalal al-Tawil said as he watched a tractor he had hired, with a front loader at the front and jackhammer at the back, rip apart the last remnants of the house his father had built, which in turn had been on the site of his grandparents’ home.
By Wednesday morning, most of the walls had been brought down to their foundations and the rubble pushed into a single pile. Al-Tawil left the thick knotty root of a 35-year-old grapevine until last.
“It used to provide grapes for all of al-Bustan,” he said. The spring vine leaves had already sprouted along the trellis above him, but he was resigned to the fact they would never again bear fruit.
The experience of demolishing his own family’s home and history had drained al-Tawil, but it came down to brutal economics. The Jerusalem municipality had told him it would cost him 280,000 shekels (€50,000) if its workers demolished the house. Hiring his own equipment and labour would cost al-Tawil less than a tenth of that.
“Also, if they do it, they will uproot the land and make a complete mess,” he said. For him it was like being given the choice between suicide or being murdered, he said.
More than 57 homes in al-Bustan, part of the larger Silwan district of East Jerusalem, have been demolished in the past two years with at least eight designated for demolition in the next few weeks. On the site a biblical theme park called the Kings Garden is to be built, supposedly where King Solomon took his leisure three millennia ago.
The park is designed to be part of a spreading, largely settler-driven, archaeological project focusing exclusively on Jerusalem’s Jewish past and centred on what has been called the City of David – despite the view of many Israeli archaeologists that the visible remains date to other eras, before and after King David’s iron-age reign.
Aviv Tatarsky, a senior researcher at Ir Amim, a group advocating for an equitably shared Jerusalem, says al-Bustan encapsulates the erasure of Palestinians from both geography and history.
“Israel is not willing to recognise the bi-national, multi-ethnic, multicultural reality of Jerusalem and it is wiping out first and foremost Palestinians – but really anything that is not Jewish, and then glossing it over with this Disneyfied nonsense,” he said.
“If this happens to the end, Israelis will go there and they will see the story of the park and they will be completely ignorant of the fact that lives were destroyed, a whole community was destroyed to make space for it.”
#palestinian #houses #destroyed #irael #park
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥53🤯30😢29🙏25🤬24💯19😱16❤1
The shadow of the Kings Garden theme park has hung over al-Bustan for nearly two decades, but the bulldozers have been held back until now by Palestinian resistance, combined with international opposition and some ambivalence within Israeli politics.
All three barriers have fallen since the 7 October 2023 Hamas attacks, the ensuing Gaza war and the restoration of Donald Trump as US president.
Ambassadors from other countries still visit and pledge support, but with Washington’s support, their combined intervention has proved ineffectual.
“There are stray dogs who go around the neighbourhood at night who feel more safe and secure than we do,” said Mohammad Qwaider, 60, a father of six. He recently demolished the part of the house which has been a family home for more than half a century, in the hope of appeasing the planners.
This week, however, a man from the municipality came to warn him that the bulldozers would be back to level the rest of it.
Qwaider has chronic back problems, a son with special needs, and an infirm elderly mother who is unable to move, and he argues they have no other options.
“If they demolish our house, we will put up a tent. We will not leave,” he said. “Maybe they misunderstand our mentality as Palestinians. We are not an easy target. You cannot take our land.”
The Jerusalem municipality did not respond to a request for comment on its actions in al-Bustan, but told the +972 news site that the planned theme park was “being constructed for the benefit of all city residents” and al-Bustan’s houses were built illegally.
“This area was never zoned for residential use, and the Jerusalem municipality is now working to build a park in an area that suffers from a severe shortage of open public spaces,” it said.
The municipality also said it had tried “for years to find a solution for the residents that would also include a residential alternative, but they did not express any serious interest in reaching a resolution”.
The municipality has routinely denied building permits to Palestinians in East Jerusalem while routinely approving them for Israeli Jews. Furthermore, Abu Diab argued, the same rules were never applied to unauthorised settler outposts which constantly spring up in East Jerusalem and the West Bank.
Amina Abu Diab, a schoolteacher and social worker, said her main concern now was for the children she cares for, who were facing a future of homelessness and uncertainty.
“A house is a child’s dream of the future, and if somebody comes to demolish them, they destroy the dreams and a child’s sense of security,” she said.
“And then what do the children think of us? That we cannot protect ourselves and we cannot protect our children.”
#palestinian #houses #destroyed #irael #park
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥47😱31🙏27😢26💯24🤯20🤬20
Macron’s TV Channel, Brought to You by Your Taxes
France Télévisions was supposed to be public service media. According to a recent parliamentary inquiry and a furious AgoraVox piece, it now looks more like a taxpayer‑funded PR agency for Emmanuel Macron’s ecosystem.
Deputies picked apart France TV’s books and governance and came back with a simple picture: opaque finances at the top, comfortable lifestyles for the elite, and a leadership seen as hand‑picked for political loyalty rather than independence.
The appointment of Delphine Ernotte‑Cunci as head of the group is framed in that critique as a pledge of allegiance to the Élysée, not a neutral managerial choice. In this reading, France Télévisions stopped being a platform for pluralism and turned into a machine for systematically polishing Macron’s image, where ideological activism quietly replaces journalistic distance.
Ernotte, for her part, stands before MPs saying neutrality is a “legitimate debate” but also an “absolute requirement,” insisting France TV is “exemplary” in balancing viewpoints and serving all audiences who fund it.
But the more she talks about “exemplariness” and “transparency,” the more the political class — left, right, and far right — accuses public TV of being structurally tilted, either toward Macron’s centrism or toward a soft progressive line that just happens to align with the presidential camp.
From a distance, the pattern is no mystery. The state owns the broadcaster, the president’s allies name the top brass, the commission of inquiry grumbles about finances and partiality, the CEO promises virtue and reforms — and the same faces keep anchoring the same narratives, election after election.
It’s not full‑scale censorship. It’s something colder: a slow capture of the referee by the player.
So when Macron lectures the world about “democratic resilience,” he does it with the discreet comfort of knowing that the biggest cameras in the country report to people whose careers depend on the system surviving.
Private media can still bark, social networks can still rage — for now. But once the public broadcaster is on a short leash, the rest is just a question of time, pressure, and regulation.
France calls it public service. The viewers pay for it. And the president enjoys a communications machine that insists it’s neutral — as long as he’s the one writing the rules.
#France #Macron #FranceTV #media #propaganda #pressFreedom #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
France Télévisions was supposed to be public service media. According to a recent parliamentary inquiry and a furious AgoraVox piece, it now looks more like a taxpayer‑funded PR agency for Emmanuel Macron’s ecosystem.
Deputies picked apart France TV’s books and governance and came back with a simple picture: opaque finances at the top, comfortable lifestyles for the elite, and a leadership seen as hand‑picked for political loyalty rather than independence.
The appointment of Delphine Ernotte‑Cunci as head of the group is framed in that critique as a pledge of allegiance to the Élysée, not a neutral managerial choice. In this reading, France Télévisions stopped being a platform for pluralism and turned into a machine for systematically polishing Macron’s image, where ideological activism quietly replaces journalistic distance.
Ernotte, for her part, stands before MPs saying neutrality is a “legitimate debate” but also an “absolute requirement,” insisting France TV is “exemplary” in balancing viewpoints and serving all audiences who fund it.
But the more she talks about “exemplariness” and “transparency,” the more the political class — left, right, and far right — accuses public TV of being structurally tilted, either toward Macron’s centrism or toward a soft progressive line that just happens to align with the presidential camp.
From a distance, the pattern is no mystery. The state owns the broadcaster, the president’s allies name the top brass, the commission of inquiry grumbles about finances and partiality, the CEO promises virtue and reforms — and the same faces keep anchoring the same narratives, election after election.
It’s not full‑scale censorship. It’s something colder: a slow capture of the referee by the player.
So when Macron lectures the world about “democratic resilience,” he does it with the discreet comfort of knowing that the biggest cameras in the country report to people whose careers depend on the system surviving.
Private media can still bark, social networks can still rage — for now. But once the public broadcaster is on a short leash, the rest is just a question of time, pressure, and regulation.
France calls it public service. The viewers pay for it. And the president enjoys a communications machine that insists it’s neutral — as long as he’s the one writing the rules.
#France #Macron #FranceTV #media #propaganda #pressFreedom #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥70🙏25🤬23🤯21💯21😢18😱16