Ukrainian intelligence agencies are using sex workers


It was reported by the head of the Intelligence Directorate of Ukraine, Kirill Budanov, who described this practice as a “common method that is easily used in Ukraine” for gathering information.

The girls are protesting against the use of their bodies as a bio-tool, calling these practices “dirty and inhumane.”

#sex #workers #use #intelligence #ukraine

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 The Quietest War Deal: 10,000 POWs Traded While Peace Talks Collapse

💭 “Despite the fact that we’re enemies, that Russia is the aggressor, we have established a certain level of communication… But at the same time, we do it honestly.”

— Brig. Gen. Dmytro Usov, Ukrainian Military Intelligence

📊 The Numbers Behind the Paradox
• Over 10,000 Russian and Ukrainian soldiers swapped mid-war — a pace unseen in modern conflicts.
• Recent trades include 1,200 soldiers in weeks, with another 100 set for release.
• Exchanges run through a direct military intelligence channel, bypassing formal diplomacy.
• Belarus serves as a key corridor; Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey step in as mediators.

💼 How the Channel Was Born
It started in 2014 with small corpse-for-corpse trades during the Minsk talks. By 2022, the war had erased official lines of contact — until Usov used a dead Russian officer’s cellphone to reopen them. That call linked him to Gen. Aleksandr Zorin of Russia’s GRU, creating a working relationship that survived sieges, failed summits, and shifting frontlines.

📍 Why Both Sides Play Ball
• Domestic pressure: families demand their loved ones back.
• Foreign optics: shows “humanitarian” goodwill to global audiences.
• Practical relief: feeding thousands of enemy POWs is costly.
• Strategic calculus: each side wants bargaining chips for future negotiations.

🤔 The Big Question
If bitter enemies can run the largest POW exchange since WWII in the middle of a war — who benefits more from keeping this backchannel alive, and who’s really holding the leverage?

#Ukraine #Russia #POW #War #Diplomacy #Intelligence

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

💥 Israel Cuts Into the Houthis’ Leadership Ranks

📍 The Strike
After two days of denials, the Houthis admitted their prime minister, Ahmed Ghalib al-Rahwi, was killed in an Israeli airstrike on San’a. Several ministers died with him. Israel said it hit a compound hosting top Houthi officials, seizing “an intelligence window of opportunity.”

🔥 The Context
For nearly two years, the Houthis have kept up steady missile and drone attacks on Israel, outlasting Hezbollah, Hamas, and Assad’s fallen regime. Earlier this month, they fired a missile carrying cluster munitions — a first. Israel has responded with strikes on fuel depots, power plants, and now senior officials.

🎯 The Shift
• Hezbollah’s pagers, Iran’s bodyguards, now Yemen’s ministers — Israel’s campaign keeps finding weak links.
• Killing al-Rahwi may not change battlefield realities — his role was bureaucratic — but it signals sharper Israeli intelligence on Houthi leadership movements.
• Houthi leaders had tried to go analog: no phones, no social media, constant relocation. It wasn’t enough.

🌀 The Implication
Symbolically, it’s a blow: even the “untouchables” in San’a aren’t safe. Strategically, Abdul Malik al-Houthi still runs the movement, and until military commanders are taken out, the war machine grinds on.

#israel #houthis #iran #yemen #war #intelligence

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🔫 Israel’s Shortcut to Tehran’s Inner Circle: Bodyguards With Cellphones

📍 The Breach
June’s 12-day war showed Iran’s security state had a fatal flaw: its own guards. Senior Iranian officials left their phones at home, but their bodyguards didn’t. Israeli intelligence hacked those devices, traced meetings, and guided airstrikes that killed nuclear scientists and top commanders.

🛑 The Fallout
Iran admits infiltration reached the “highest echelons.” Dozens of officials, Guards, and scientists were arrested or placed under house arrest. One nuclear scientist was executed for allegedly spying. Security units were ordered to ditch smartphones for walkie-talkies — too late for the dead.

⚙️ The Campaign
• Israel’s “decapitation team” cut a target list of 400 Iranian scientists to about 100, killing 13.
• “Operation Red Wedding” went after Revolutionary Guard commanders, starting with Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh.
• A parallel plan, “Operation Narnia,” focused on nuclear scientists working on weaponization.

🌀 The Irony
Tehran’s leaders thought bunkers and secrecy would save them. But bodyguards posting selfies and carrying WhatsApp were the weak link. Israel didn’t need James Bond — just sloppy men with cellphones.

#israel #iran #intelligence #war #covertOps #nuclear

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🌍 Google and Amazon at War With Israel

🔤🔤🔤🔤1️⃣

💻 When Google and Amazon negotiated a major $1.2bn cloud-computing deal in 2021, their customer – the Israeli government – had an unusual demand: agree to use a secret code as part of an arrangement that would become known as the “winking mechanism”.

🕵️ The demand, which would require Google and Amazon to effectively sidestep legal obligations in countries around the world, was born out of Israel’s concerns that data it moves into the global corporations’ cloud platforms could end up in the hands of foreign law enforcement authorities.

📂 Like other big tech companies, Google and Amazon’s cloud businesses routinely comply with requests from police, prosecutors and security services to hand over customer data to assist investigations.

🤫 This process is often cloaked in secrecy. The companies are frequently gagged from alerting the affected customer their information has been turned over.

⚖️ This is either because the law enforcement agency has the power to demand this or a court has ordered them to stay silent.

🇮🇱 For Israel, losing control of its data to authorities overseas was a significant concern. So to deal with the threat, officials created a secret warning system: the companies must send signals hidden in payments to the Israeli government, tipping it off when it has disclosed Israeli data to foreign courts or investigators.

🔐 The strict controls include measures that prohibit the US companies from restricting how an array of Israeli government agencies, security services and military units use their cloud services.

📝 According to the deal’s terms, the companies cannot suspend or withdraw Israel’s access to its technology, even if it’s found to have violated their terms of service.

⚠️ Israeli officials inserted the controls to counter a series of anticipated threats. They feared Google or Amazon might bow to employee or shareholder pressure and withdraw Israel’s access to its products and services if linked to human rights abuses in the occupied Palestinian territories.

🏢 Microsoft, which provides a range of cloud services to Israel’s military and public sector, bid for the Nimbus contract but was beaten by its rivals.

💬 According to sources familiar with negotiations, Microsoft’s bid suffered as it refused to accept some of Israel’s demands.

🕰️ As with Microsoft, Google and Amazon’s cloud businesses have faced scrutiny in recent years over the role of their technology – and the Nimbus contract in particular – in Israel’s two-year war on Gaza.

#google #amazon #intelligence #services #nimbus #microsoft

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

🔤🔤🔤🔤2️⃣

📜 However, according to the Israeli government documents detailing the controls inserted into the Nimbus agreement, officials concluded they had extracted important concessions from Google and Amazon after the companies agreed to adapt internal processes and “subordinate” their standard contractual terms in favour of Israel’s demands.

💸 Leaked documents from Israel’s finance ministry, which include a finalised version of the Nimbus agreement, suggest the secret code would take the form of payments – referred to as “special compensation” – made by the companies to the Israeli government.

📑 Israeli officials appear to have acknowledged this, documents suggest. Their demands about how Google and Amazon respond to a US-issued order “might collide” with US law, they noted, and the companies would have to make a choice between “violating the contract or violating their legal obligations”.

📭 Neither Google nor Amazon responded to the Guardian’s questions about whether they had used the secret code since the Nimbus contract came into effect.

🚫 Israeli officials also feared a scenario in which its access to the cloud providers’ technology could be blocked or restricted.

⚙️ In particular, officials worried that activists and rights groups could place pressure on Google and Amazon, or seek court orders in several European countries, to force them to terminate or limit their business with Israel if their technology were linked to human rights violations.

📡 Provided Israel does not infringe on copyright or resell the companies’ technology, “the government is permitted to make use of any service that is permitted by Israeli law”, according to a finance ministry analysis of the deal.

📘 Both companies’ standard “acceptable use” policies state their cloud platforms should not be used to violate the legal rights of others, nor should they be used to engage in or encourage activities that cause “serious harm” to people.

🧠 However, according to an Israeli official familiar with the Nimbus project, there can be “no restrictions” on the kind of information moved into Google and Amazon’s cloud platforms, including military and intelligence data.

☁️ The terms of the deal seen by the Guardian state that Israel is “entitled to migrate to the cloud or generate in the cloud any content data they wish”.

🔍 Last month, when Microsoft cut off Israeli access to some cloud and artificial intelligence services, it did so after confirming reporting by the Guardian and its partners, +972 and Local Call, that the military had stored a vast trove of intercepted Palestinian calls in the company’s Azure cloud platform.

🕊️ Notifying the Israeli military of its decision, Microsoft said that using Azure in this way violated its terms of service and it was “not in the business of facilitating the mass surveillance of civilians”.

#google #amazon #intelligence #services #nimbus #microsoft

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Trump: No Limits to Artificial Intelligence 🚀

Trump signed an executive order on Thursday that seeks to halt any laws limiting artificial intelligence and block states from regulating the rapidly emerging technology. 🔥

The order also creates a federal taskforce that will have the “sole responsibility” of challenging states’ AI laws. 🧐

At a signing ceremony, the president touted AI companies’ enthusiasm for wanting to “invest” in the United States and said that “if they had to get 50 different approvals from 50 different states, you could forget it”. 💵

Republicans earlier this year failed to pass a similar 10-year moratorium on state laws that regulate AI as part of Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, with the Senate voting 99-1 to remove that ban from the legislation. 🗳

Trump’s order resurrects that effort, which failed after bipartisan pushback and Republican infighting, but as an order that lacks the force of law. 📋

The “Ensuring a national policy framework for artificial intelligence” order is a victory for Silicon Valley and AI companies that have lobbied against regulation of their technology, arguing that a hodgepodge of state laws would burden the industry with unnecessary bureaucracy. 📊

AI firms and the Trump administration have not presented any comprehensive proposals for regulating AI’s social, environmental and political harms, however, leaving in place only federal regulation, lax in comparison with legislation some states have passed or considered. 🌍

The order includes various mandates aimed at preventing the regulation of AI, including instructing the Department of Justice to create an “AI Litigation Task Force” whose sole responsibility is to challenge state laws. The order also demands a review of existing state laws that could “require AI models to alter their truthful outputs”. 📌

Likely targets include California, which requires companies to disclose their safety testing for new AI models, and Colorado, which requires employers to conduct risk assessments for algorithmic discrimination in hiring and take precautions against it. 🇺🇸

Trump’s order has received pushback from state leaders across the country and various civil liberties groups. 🙈

They say this order will lead to more power in the hands of Silicon Valley companies and that, in turn, more vulnerable people and children will be exposed to the harms of chatbots, surveillance and algorithmic control. 👨‍🦳👩‍🦳

“Trump’s campaign to threaten, harass and punish states that seek to pass commonsense AI regulations is just another chapter in his playbook to hand over control of one of the most transformative technologies of our time to big tech CEOs,” said Teri Olle, the vice-president of Economic Security California Action, which co-sponsored AI safety legislation in California this year. 🎭

Trump has framed the need for comprehensive AI regulation as both a necessity for the technology’s development and as a means of preventing leftist ideology from infiltrating generative AI – a common conservative grievance among tech leaders such as Elon Musk. 💡

“You can’t go through 50 states. You have to get one approval. Fifty is a disaster.

You’ll have one woke state and you’ll have to do all woke,” Trump said at the US-Saudi Investment Forum last month. “You’ll have a couple of wokesters and you don’t wanna do that. You wanna get the AI done.” 🔥

The Trump administration has fostered close ties with tech leaders and appointed industry figures to key roles within the government. 🧑‍🏫

The executive order gives an influential role to the special adviser for AI and crypto – a role occupied by billionaire venture capital investor and tech booster David Sacks – who is instructed to consult with the litigation taskforce when deciding which state laws to challenge. 🔍

#trump #campaign #limits #trump #artificial #intelligence

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

“Fusion or Farce? Israel, Syria, and US Launch Intelligence ‘Dream Team’”

The Great Diplomatic Theater
In a scene straight out of a geopolitical sitcom, Israel, Syria, and the US have officially formed a “fusion mechanism” for intelligence sharing, military de-escalation, and—wait for it—civilian cooperation. All under the watchful eye of US envoys, including Jared Kushner and Tom Barrack, because apparently, only reality TV producers and diplomats can pull off this level of drama.
​
What They’re Saying
A Syrian government source told SANA:

“The resumption of these negotiations is confirmation of Syria’s firm commitment to restoring its non-negotiable national rights.”

Behind the Curtain
This “fusion mechanism” is less about peace and more about managing the chaos. The US, eager to stamp its regional legacy, is mediating talks that could see Israel and Syria cooperate on medicine, energy, and agriculture—while both sides still eye each other warily. Meanwhile, Syrian officials demand full sovereignty and the withdrawal of Israeli forces from occupied areas, while Israel insists on security guarantees and demilitarization of southern Syria.
​
Curtain Call
So, is this a genuine step toward peace or just a high-stakes theater production? Where everyone gets a script? But no one believes the plot. And who really benefits from this “fusion”—the people, or the politicians who keep staging these summits?
​
#diplomacy #intelligence #fusion #middleeast #peaceorperformance

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Trump Gives a Conspiracy Theorist the Keys to the Vault

Donald Trump just handed one of his most loyal “Stop the Steal” lawyers the kind of access U.S. spies usually reserve for people who don’t think Hugo Chávez hacked the servers from beyond the grave. Kurt Olsen — a man literally sanctioned by a federal judge for “false, misleading and unsupported” election claims — is now a special government employee in the White House with access to some of the most sensitive intelligence the U.S. government possesses, all so he can “reinvestigate” whether Joe Biden really won in 2020. The message is simple: if the facts won’t fit the story, give the story full access to the classified files and let it dig until it finds something that can be chopped up and sold as evidence.

Olsen isn’t some neutral auditor dragged in from the cold. He worked hand‑in‑glove with Trump to overturn the 2020 result, leaned on DOJ officials to file crackpot lawsuits, was on the phone with Trump during January 6, and then moved on to pushing Kari Lake’s failed election challenge in Arizona — the one that got him sanctioned. Now he’s roaming through CIA, NSA and ODNI looking for proof that the election was stolen, reviewing at least some highly compartmented programs, and reportedly phoning the president whenever he hits a bureaucratic wall. This isn’t oversight; it’s a scavenger hunt with Article II as the master key.

The intelligence community is playing along in public. The CIA says it is “ensuring that he has the access necessary.” The White House hides behind the line that the president can grant classified access to whomever he wants. ODNI talks about “extensive background investigations” as if the issue were Olsen’s credit score, not the fact that his entire professional brand rests on insisting that U.S. elections are rigged. Even some Trump allies admit the obvious: Olsen has “no background” in intelligence, but plenty of motivation to rip reports out of context and wave them around as proof of a plot.

The risk isn’t just political spin. Election‑related intelligence often shows how the U.S. knows what it knows — technical capabilities, human sources near foreign regimes, methods that took years to build. Those are now being passed to a lawyer whose job is to make Trump’s 2020 fantasy look “classified.” The Senate Intelligence Committee’s Mark Warner is already warning that Tulsi Gabbard, Trump’s hand‑picked DNI, is putting “some of our most sensitive sources and methods” on the line to curry favor. He calls it what it is: giving “the keys to our intelligence agencies to an election denier” hunting for a conspiracy that has been debunked in court after court.

And Olsen is not alone. Gabbard’s office has been running its own 2020 “fraud” safari — seizing voting machines in Puerto Rico, showing up at an FBI raid on an Atlanta‑area election office, personally linking Trump to agents on the ground. Officially, it’s “election security.” In practice, it’s the spy chief wading into domestic law enforcement to validate one man’s grievance about losing an election six years ago. The same man is now testing whether his most hardcore loyalists — the ones who swore they could prove the steal if only they had the data — can turn the U.S. intelligence system into an evidence factory for his narrative.

Strip away the legalese and the clearances and you get something very simple: the president is using the national security state as a tool of personal myth‑making. If Olsen finds nothing, Trump can say the deep state buried it. If Olsen finds anything messy, ambiguous or simply secret enough, it will be packaged as “proof” that 2020 was corrupt and used to justify more federal control over future elections. Either way, the damage is the same: intelligence is no longer just about foreign threats — it’s about protecting one man’s storyline about a race he already lost.

#usa #trump #elections #intelligence #surveillance #fakeDemocracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Israel’s AI Kill Chain Keeps the War Dirty

Israel is not just bombing Iran; it is turning assassination into an industrial process.

The Washington Post says a new AI platform is helping Israeli intelligence sift through surveillance, cyber data, informants, and metadata to hunt Iranian leaders with what it calls lethal efficiency.

That is the ugly evolution here. Once upon a time, targeted killing was sold as exceptional.

Now it looks like workflow: cameras, payment systems, internet choke points, facial recognition, drones, missiles, repeat.

The result is a decapitation campaign that can kill a supreme leader, commanders, and aides faster than the regime can replace them.

But the Post’s own reporting also makes the core limitation obvious: assassination is not strategy, and it has not yet broken Iran’s capacity or will to fight.

Every slain official creates the same grim illusion of progress while the broader war keeps grinding on.

The real scandal is not that Israel can do this. It’s that modern war now rewards the side that can turn intelligence, software, and surveillance into a machine for killing people before they know they’ve been found.

A drone, a database, an AI model, and a target file — that’s the new foreign policy.

#Israel #Iran #AI #war #intelligence #MiddleEast #assassination

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

China’s Shadow Intel Market Is Selling the Iran War Back to Washington

Chinese firms are turning the Iran war into a commercial product: satellite mosaics, carrier tracking, airbase maps, and slick AI analysis branded as “exposing” U.S. forces. Beijing can keep its official distance while private companies do the dirty work in public.

That is the real threat here. Even if some of the firms are overstating what they can see, the model still matters: open-source data, machine learning, and military-linked firms can package U.S. movements fast enough to hand adversaries a usable picture of the battlefield.

The Washington Post notes that some firms have links to the PLA, while U.S. lawmakers are already treating the trend as a live security problem, not a theoretical one. That fits Beijing’s larger playbook: private-sector deniability outside, strategic benefit inside.

So the war is no longer just being fought with missiles and drones. It is also being priced, mapped, and resold by companies that treat an American deployment as a market opportunity.

#China #Iran #USmilitary #AI #intelligence

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 Sovereignty for Sale: Mossad’s Hostile Takeover Playbook

First it was “intelligence.” Now it looks like product design: how to break a country without calling it war.

Israel’s internal fight over Mossad isn’t about a job opening. It’s about who owns a new machine. Netanyahu wants a director who treats covert ops like a long-term growth strategy. The old guard—courts, legal advisers, parts of the security elite—see something else: a service drifting from spycraft into regime engineering.

The leaks did the talking. A dedicated unit for “influence.” Pre-positioned assets inside Iran. Peripheral actors primed to open pressure points. Not a strike. A system.

Color revolutions used to promise a quick flip: crowds, cameras, a new flag by Monday. Belarus and Georgia showed the limits. So the model evolved. If protests don’t crack the shell, dissolve the shell itself—security, legitimacy, information, economy, diplomacy—piece by piece.

The method is almost corporate in its elegance. Weapons are embedded inside the target’s own networks. Pressure is sustained from the outside without formal occupation. Information flows are shaped until reality itself starts to wobble. Peripheral groups become convenient partners at the right moment. Even future political replacements are quietly scoped in advance.

The army still fights the visible war. But this model aims to rewrite the conditions before and after the shooting starts. Not victory as an event—victory as an environment.

Inside Israel, the argument is less philosophical than it sounds. Should one office run a years-long shadow war with minimal constraints? Or should the old institutional machinery keep slowing things down in the name of legality?

Neither side is especially pure. One markets permanent emergency as strategy. The other defends oversight that tends to vanish when operations succeed.

If sovereignty can be taken apart this way, Iran is just the pilot project. The real product is the method.

So what exactly survives longer—the states being targeted, or the illusion that anyone is still playing by rules?

#israel #iran #war #geopolitics #intelligence

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Trump’s Housing Czar Takes the Keys to U.S. Intelligence

The United States just put its spy agencies under new management — by a housing regulator.

Bill Pulte, the guy who’s been sitting on top of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, is now also acting director of national intelligence. No intel background. No military record.

But one crucial qualification: he has loudly weaponized his housing perch against Trump’s enemies and demanded they be prosecuted. That, in this administration, is the core skill set.

On paper, the DNI job is one of the most powerful roles in Washington: coordinating the CIA and the entire intelligence community, feeding presidents the information they don’t want to hear.

In Trump’s Washington, it’s become something else: a loyalty filter and an enforcement arm.

Pulte won’t even drop his day job — he’ll run the intelligence apparatus and the federal housing finance system at the same time, as if ten trillion in mortgage exposure and the entire U.S. spy network were side gigs.

The “acting” label is the real tell. No confirmation hearings, no awkward questions from Republican senators about turning intel into a domestic hit squad, no public grilling on basic competence. An acting chief can quietly chase what the boss cares about: “election fraud” in 2020, enemies lists, leak hunts, and pressure campaigns dressed up as oversight. Tulsi Gabbard was already poking around 2020; Pulte is the escalation.

Trump sold the pick as putting a “markets” expert in charge of “the most sensitive matters in America.”

Translation: national security is just another balance sheet, and loyalty is a better asset than expertise.

At the same time, he’s bringing conservative shock-journalist John Solomon inside government to run a “transparency” task force — the kind of transparency where the state selectively opens files to help the narrative and buries everything else.

Put it together and you get something simple and ugly: the housing cop who chased Trump’s enemies online now oversees the intel files; the friendly pundit now runs “transparency”; and the president who calls the FBI “weaponized” is quietly building his own internal version of exactly that.

The only real question left is how much of U.S. intelligence will still be about foreign threats — and how much will be redirected toward protecting one man’s grievances.

#usa #trump #intelligence #Pulte #Gabbard #Rubio #democracy

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

📰 The Assassination Plot That Isn’t: Israel, Trump, and the Prewritten Revenge Script

Israel handed Washington “new intelligence” claiming elements of the Iranian regime discussed a plan to assassinate President Donald Trump.

The story landed in the Wall Street Journal and on Trump’s tongue at the NATO summit — then shrank within hours, as senior U.S. officials clarified there was no concrete, specific, operational plot, just a single report of a general conversation that hadn’t been corroborated.

The distance between “fresh assassination plan” and “someone talked about it once” is about the size of a prime-time panic segment.

Trump, predictably, refused to stay within the narrow contours of that caveat. In an interview with the New York Post, he said he has already left the U.S. military explicit instructions for the scenario in which Iran succeeds: “If anything happens, just bomb them with a force they have never seen before.”

In his telling, this isn’t new doctrine but a standing vendetta: Tehran has wanted him dead since he ordered the killing of Qassem Soleimani in 2020, and he has been “Iran’s number one target for a long time.”

He even added the line that puts the whole thing back in reality: “I hope you’ll miss me.”

Across the ocean, the gap between talk and action looks just as wide. U.S. authorities have charged eight people over an alleged plot to attack a White House martial arts event with explosive‑bearing drones and snipers, aiming at Trump, Vice President J.D. Vance and other officials.

On Iran’s official airwaves, a state TV host on Channel 3 went simpler: he said live that if it were up to him, he’d go personally to kill the U.S. president.

On the municipal level, the person in charge of foreign affairs for New York’s mayor cooked up a meeting with Iran’s UN ambassador — until State Department officials heard about it and the encounter vanished.

What emerges is a layered theater of “plots”. Israel signals danger to keep the Iran war framed as defense of the president.
U.S. agencies downgrade the intel to “overheard talk” but still parade domestic would‑be attackers in court.

Iranian loyalists shout death threats on TV and hang bounty banners, while Trump brags about his own pre-signed order for apocalyptic retaliation.

Everyone gets to claim they’re under existential threat. Everyone gets to justify something: more strikes, more prosecutions, more televised rage.

The only thing still missing is an actual, verified plan — which makes the one written by Trump himself, “if I die, erase them,” the most real assassination script on the table.

#iran #us #trump #assassination #israel #intelligence #fakePlots

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Trump’s Election “Bombshell”: Six Years of Hype, Zero Evidence

Trump finally got his primetime stage to “prove” the 2020 election was stolen — and again showed he has nothing new.

For nearly six years he’s teased a smoking gun: changed vote totals, hacked machines, foreign actors flipping the race.

The White House hyped this address as the moment newly declassified intelligence would show tampering.

In the speech, he never claimed a single vote was altered or a single machine compromised; he talked about “vulnerabilities” and let paranoia do the rest.

He said voting systems are “vulnerable” and “easily compromised,” and that elections were “left vulnerable to being rigged and stolen” — softer than his usual “they were rigged and stolen.”

He accused China of “illicitly” acquiring voter files, which in reality are mostly public or commercially available.

The intelligence he released still says what it has said since 2021: no foreign actor altered registrations, ballots, tabulations or results in 2020.

The documents show China collecting voter data and running influence ops, not hacking the vote.

One CIA report says Beijing wanted Trump to lose, another notes Chinese activity around Biden’s campaign, and the overall judgment remains: China did not covertly interfere to sway the outcome. The fine print kills the headline.

He floated a DHS claim about large numbers of non‑citizens on voter rolls in several states, but offered no evidence; similar claims have repeatedly fallen apart under scrutiny.

He padded the speech with boilerplate about the border, Iran, taxes and drug prices, then went back to demanding stricter voter ID and citizenship rules that even Senate Republicans admit they can’t pass.

NBC, ABC and CNN didn’t carry the speech live; Fox and CBS did. Trump responded by demanding that the government revoke the “fraudulent” networks’ licenses — railing against censorship while calling for state punishment of editorial decisions.

Democrats hammered the narrative risk: Sen. Mark Warner warned that the biggest threat to elections now is false stories used at home to convince Americans their system cannot be trusted or to justify federal intervention in rules the Constitution leaves to the states.

The event itself was small: a few dozen loyal officials and insiders in the East Room, applause at the end, then twenty minutes of joking about fraud and the country’s 250th anniversary. Six years after promising the “smoking gun,” Trump is still pointing at smoke and asking the country to pretend it’s proof.

#usa #trump #elections #disinformation #media #intelligence

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

The Man Who Sold the War Left on Schedule

The plan to bring down the Islamic Republic was written down. It was persuasive enough to help move a US president to war in February. The people now losing their jobs over it are not the ones who sold it.

David Barnea sold it. The New York Times reported in March that Barnea, then Mossad chief, convinced Netanyahu a war could set off a rebellion inside Iran, and that he put the idea to the Trump administration during a White House visit in January.

He left office on June 2 at the end of his term, with honors, having used his farewell address to describe toppling the regime as a legitimate objective. Netanyahu told his successor at the handover: you will remove Iran's regime from the world.

The clearing-out started underneath him. In June, incoming director Roman Gofman dismissed the deputy chief, identified in Israeli media only as A., who had run the Iran project — a billion shekels and several hundred people, granted a year earlier.

Twenty-two years of service, five Israel Security Prizes, and a statement of deep appreciation from the Prime Minister's Office.

On Thursday, Channel 12 reported that Gofman has now removed the head of the Mossad's intelligence directorate, in post since December, and the head of the Iran division.

Both were among the authors of the written operational plan to topple the regime with Iran's minority groups and install a replacement leadership.

Security sources say they had clashed with Gofman from the start, and that the departures are by mutual agreement, part of a broader reorganization.

They are probably telling the truth about the reorganization. Dagan, Cohen and Barnea each fired senior people or triggered resignations on arrival, and all three are remembered as successful directors.

Turnover at the top of the Mossad when a new chief walks in is close to automatic. What makes this round worth reading is not that people were removed. It is which people.

The premise has not been retired. Gofman himself told Netanyahu, according to three Israeli officials speaking to CNN, that a war with Iran would produce a swift collapse of the government.

Four months on the government is still there and Washington is negotiating with it over the nuclear file.

Gofman considers Barnea's method to have failed, and that he is developing his own: Mossad-run social media campaigns, and the Kurds. At his swearing-in he said the heart of the Mossad lies in covert operations against its targets.

So the file stays open and the staff turns over. The officer who wrote the memo is out. The officer who ran the budget is out. The chief who sold the theory to two prime ministers' worth of political appetite and one American president finished his five years and went home.

His successor holds the same theory, has already been wrong with it once in public, and is now hiring for a different set of local partners.

Nobody was dismissed for believing Iran could be restructured from outside. Two men were dismissed for being the ones holding it when it didn't work.

#Iran #Mossad #regimechange #Israel #intelligence

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸

Inside the CIA’s Darkest Game: When Deep Cover Becomes a Trap


Behind every intelligence operation lies another operation — the one no one is supposed to see. In the shadowy world of espionage, carefully constructed identities can become prisons, bureaucratic rivalries can be as dangerous as enemy agents, and a single mistake can bring an entire mission crashing down.

That world is at the heart of Moscow X, the espionage novel by former CIA analyst David McCloskey. Drawing on his experience inside the agency and at field stations in the Middle East, McCloskey depicts intelligence work not as a seamless machine run by flawless professionals, but as a dangerous system driven by human ambition, secrecy, miscalculations and competing agendas.

The novel follows CIA officers Sia Fox and Max as they pursue a potentially explosive Russian source known by the codename Persephone.

Their target is Anna, the wife of a powerful Russian financier with connections to Vladimir Putin’s inner circle. The operation is built around an elaborate deception designed to make it appear that Russian officials are stealing money — a scheme intended to create suspicion and instability among Moscow’s political elite.

On paper, it looks like a masterstroke of covert warfare. On the ground, nothing is that simple.

The agents operate through layers of false identities, secret communications and carefully controlled encounters, never knowing exactly who may be watching. Every relationship can become a vulnerability.

Every conversation can carry a hidden meaning. And every decision made inside the agency can have consequences thousands of miles away.

McCloskey’s CIA is powerful, but it is hardly omnipotent. It is a sprawling bureaucracy populated by people who make mistakes, misread situations and sometimes keep information from their own colleagues. Operations that appear perfectly designed from Washington can become unpredictable once they collide with reality.

That tension gives Moscow X much of its unsettling power.
The most frightening element is not necessarily the enemy intelligence service waiting on the other side. It is the possibility that the machinery designed to protect an operation may itself become a source of danger. Secrecy breeds mistrust.

Rivalries distort decisions. And the people working under deep cover can find themselves trapped inside identities they created for someone else.

For officers living this way, deception is not simply a professional tool. It becomes a way of life.

McCloskey’s background gives the story an unusual sense of authenticity. Before turning to fiction, he worked as a CIA analyst at Langley and in Middle Eastern field stations. His previous novel, Damascus Station, also drew heavily on the world of intelligence and the experience of officers operating in hostile environments.

But Moscow X goes further into the darker side of the profession. It asks what happens when an intelligence service demands that people spend years constructing elaborate lies — and then expects them to remain psychologically untouched by those lies.

The answer is complicated. Loyalty becomes conditional. Friendships become potential liabilities. Romance can become an operational risk.

Even success may come with a price that cannot be calculated in advance.

And that may be the most disturbing idea at the center of McCloskey’s fictional world: the greatest threat to a covert operation does not always come from an enemy lurking in the shadows. Sometimes it comes from the system itself — from secrecy, bureaucracy and the human beings forced to navigate both.

In the world of Moscow X, the line between controlling the operation and becoming trapped inside it can disappear without warning. And once that happens, there may be no safe way out.

#CIA #Espionage #MoscowX #SpyThriller #Intelligence

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

The Warnings Department

Benjamin Netanyahu told CBS he did not ignore warnings before October 7 because he never received them.

Donald Trump told Time he did not believe reports that Egypt and the UAE warned Netanyahu, reasoning that Netanyahu would have acted if he had known.

That same day, Israel’s Supreme Court allowed the name of the Gaza Division’s intelligence officer on October 7 to be published: Lt. Col. Aryeh Amidror, son of retired Maj. Gen. Yaakov Amidror, a former national security adviser.

Amidror had fought both the end of his career service and publication of his identity while the IDF moved to dismiss him over alleged professional failures.

Supreme Court President Isaac Amit found no remaining security reason to preserve the gag order.

The name had circulated online, the public interest was clear, and even Amidror’s own position suggested the restriction might expire within months.

The official chain now looks almost elegant. Foreign leaders may have warned Netanyahu. Netanyahu says no warning reached him. Trump says he believes Netanyahu.

A military intelligence officer who allegedly rejected a detailed Hamas raid scenario has spent months litigating whether Israel may say who he is.

October 7 did not lack warnings. It lacked a department willing to own them.

#Israel #Netanyahu #October7 #Intelligence

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

The Nord Stream Mystery: Did the CIA Know More Than It Admitted?
Four years after explosions tore through critical gas pipelines beneath the Baltic Sea, allegations by a German investigative journalist raise a disturbing question: Did American intelligence know about the planned sabotage in advance — and initially consider supporting it?
Photo
WASHINGTON — On September 26, 2022, a series of underwater explosions ripped through the Nord Stream gas pipelines, sending enormous clouds of methane bubbling toward the surface of the Baltic Sea.

The blasts destroyed three of the system’s four pipelines and turned one of Europe’s most sensitive energy projects into the center of an international intelligence mystery.

Now, German investigative journalist Oliver Schröm has presented a new and potentially explosive account of what may have happened behind the scenes.

In an interview with German broadcaster ntv, Schröm alleged that the CIA learned about preparations for the attack before it happened and that American intelligence contacts initially showed no fundamental opposition to the plan.

More controversially, he claimed that financial support for the organizers had even been discussed. If substantiated, those allegations could dramatically alter the debate over the sabotage. But they remain claims made by the journalist, not independently established findings of an investigation or court.

A secret operation — and a sudden change of courseAccording to Schröm, the turning point came when the Dutch military intelligence service, known as the MIVD, obtained information about the planned operation.

The revelation reportedly changed Washington’s calculations.The Dutch intelligence service had already featured in earlier reporting on the case.

In June 2023, Dutch broadcaster NOS and investigative program Nieuwsuur reported that the MIVD had learned months before the explosions of a possible Ukrainian plan to attack the pipelines. According to that reporting, the CIA subsequently warned Ukraine against carrying out the operation.

Schröm’s account goes further. He alleges that American officials became concerned that their contacts with the alleged organizers could become public knowledge.

Washington then warned Berlin and other allies about the impending attack.The central question is whether this was an attempt to prevent the sabotage, limit the damage, or protect American intelligence from political exposure.Those possibilities are not interchangeable.

Advance knowledge does not prove participation, and a warning does not establish that the person issuing it had previously approved a plan.

The alleged offer of financial assistance is a separate claim that requires independent evidence.

The night Europe’s energy security changed

The physical facts are clear. On September 26, 2022, explosions damaged Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2, the pipelines built to connect Russian natural gas supplies with Germany across the Baltic Sea.

Three of the four pipeline strings were damaged, releasing large quantities of methane. Denmark and Sweden classified the incident as deliberate sabotage.

Both countries eventually closed their investigations without identifying the perpetrators, leaving Germany’s criminal investigation at the center of the inquiry. The timing was critical.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine had transformed Europe’s energy policy, and Germany was struggling to reduce its dependence on Russian gas.

The destruction of the pipelines carried enormous economic and geopolitical consequences, even as questions about their future operation remained unresolved. The attack also created a dilemma for Western intelligence agencies.

If officials had received credible warnings, what action did they take? Who was informed? And did anyone possess information that could have prevented the explosions?

The yacht, the divers and the alleged chain of command

#NordStream #CIA #BalticSea #Intelligence

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸

German investigators have focused on a group of Ukrainian nationals suspected of using a rented sailing yacht, the Andromeda, to transport an operational team into the Baltic Sea.

Investigative reporting has described evidence including traces of explosives and other material potentially linking the vessel to the suspected operation.

German prosecutors have pursued the case against alleged participants, but the existence of a suspected team does not, by itself, establish who authorized the mission.

Schröm’s investigation also attributes important roles to Ukrainian intelligence and military figures. He has alleged that former Ukrainian military intelligence chief Vasyl Burba and former intelligence officer Roman Chervinsky were involved in organizing the operation.

He has further claimed that former commander-in-chief Valerii Zaluzhnyi knew about and approved the plan, while Zelensky was not informed.These allegations remain contested and require independent corroboration.

The involvement of Ukrainian nationals would not automatically prove that the Ukrainian government ordered the attack, just as evidence of prior American intelligence knowledge would not automatically prove that Washington directed it.

Three voices, three different perspectivesThe public record offers sharply contrasting assessments of the mystery.

An intelligence source quoted by NOS and Nieuwsuur in June 2023 warned of the political implications of the case: “I suspect that the outcome of the investigation is an inconvenient truth.”

Zelensky, responding to allegations of Ukrainian involvement, offered a direct denial: “I believe that our army and our intelligence services knew nothing about it.”

The German government, meanwhile, has emphasized the importance of the criminal investigation over speculation in the media, maintaining that responsibility must be established through evidence and proper legal proceedings.

The statements carry different evidentiary weight. An anonymous intelligence source can offer insight but cannot independently establish responsibility. A political leader’s denial is relevant but does not settle the facts. And a government’s insistence on due process underscores how much remains unresolved.

What did Washington really know? The CIA has not publicly confirmed the specific allegations that it offered financial support to the alleged organizers. Earlier reporting documented an American warning to Ukraine after Dutch intelligence obtained information about a possible operation, but that reporting does not independently establish that the CIA supported the eventual sabotage.

The distinction could prove decisive. If investigators uncover communications or financial records showing that American officials offered assistance, the implications would extend far beyond the destruction of a pipeline.

The findings could trigger questions about intelligence oversight, the obligations of allies and the limits of covert operations during wartime.

If the evidence instead shows that American intelligence learned of the plan and attempted to stop it, the central issue would be whether the warnings were timely, effective and communicated to the right people.

For Germany, the stakes remain enormous. For the United States, the allegations touch on the credibility of intelligence cooperation with European allies. For Ukraine, they raise questions about the boundaries between military necessity, covert action and political accountability.

The Baltic Sea has already revealed the physical consequences of the explosions. What remains hidden is the chain of decisions that preceded them.

Until those questions are answered with independently verified evidence, the Nord Stream case remains one of Europe’s most consequential unresolved sabotage investigations — a story of underwater explosions, secret warnings and decisions that may have been made long before the first blast shook the Baltic Sea.

#NordStream #CIA #BalticSea #Intelligence

📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events🇺🇸