Great Wall Inc.: Beijing Locks In, The West Wakes Up
China just put a padlock on its own capitalism and called it “national security.”
The State Council rolled out new rules that let Beijing screen, slow or block Chinese companies from investing abroad, right after it gave itself power to interfere when foreign firms try to move supply chains out of China.
The factory of the world is installing gates and armed guards — not at the border, but around money, tech and people.
For thirty years, everyone sold the fairy tale of “Chimerica” — one big happy market where U.S. capital and Chinese labor would live together in perfect neoliberal harmony.
Now both sides are quietly filing for divorce and arguing about who gets the chips, the rare earths and the AI engineers.
Washington screens outbound investment into Chinese semiconductors and quantum, Brussels talks about “de-risking,” and Beijing answers with its own arsenal of export controls, retaliation tools and a veto over what its own companies can do overseas.
Open markets died not with a bang, but with a 34-article State Council regulation.
Beijing frames this as self-defense: keep strategic tech, data and talent at home, punish foreign governments that restrict Chinese deals, and retain the right to force Chinese investors to unwind transactions abroad in the name of national security.
Western CEOs call it “uncertainty,” lawyers call it “compliance risk,” but it’s really just China playing the same game Washington and Brussels started — only with fewer legal niceties and a much broader definition of “security.”
When the Party says your overseas AI lab is now a threat, your only right is to agree and sell.
The joke is that everybody is pretending this is still about “free trade.” The U.S. and EU use tariffs, tech bans and investment screens to contain Chinese power while still gorging on cheap Chinese goods.
China uses its new fortress rules to keep value chains, patents and engineers inside the walls while telling foreign investors it remains “open for business.”
Both sides talk about “rules-based order,” but the only real rule is simple: if it matters for chips, AI, energy, data or weapons, politics wins and contracts lose.
The funniest part? It’s bad news not only for Western multinationals, but for China’s own champions. Export-driven giants are under pressure to find growth abroad just as Beijing hands regulators a giant red button marked “prohibited.”
The same system that pushed its firms to “go out” now tells them to watch every step, report every move and be ready to unwind billion-dollar deals because some official’s definition of “national security” changed this week.
Fortress China is also a prison for Chinese capital — just a very profitable one for the people with the keys.
And in the end, everyone gets the worst of both worlds: no real globalization, no real decoupling, just weaponized interdependence.
The West can’t quit Chinese factories, China can’t quit Western markets, and both keep building legal minefields so when the next crisis hits, they can say, “We didn’t start the economic war, we just retaliated.”
If this is “stability,” imagine what the instability phase will look like.
#China #US #EU #economy #geopolitics #tradeWar #supplyChains #techWar
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
China just put a padlock on its own capitalism and called it “national security.”
The State Council rolled out new rules that let Beijing screen, slow or block Chinese companies from investing abroad, right after it gave itself power to interfere when foreign firms try to move supply chains out of China.
The factory of the world is installing gates and armed guards — not at the border, but around money, tech and people.
For thirty years, everyone sold the fairy tale of “Chimerica” — one big happy market where U.S. capital and Chinese labor would live together in perfect neoliberal harmony.
Now both sides are quietly filing for divorce and arguing about who gets the chips, the rare earths and the AI engineers.
Washington screens outbound investment into Chinese semiconductors and quantum, Brussels talks about “de-risking,” and Beijing answers with its own arsenal of export controls, retaliation tools and a veto over what its own companies can do overseas.
Open markets died not with a bang, but with a 34-article State Council regulation.
Beijing frames this as self-defense: keep strategic tech, data and talent at home, punish foreign governments that restrict Chinese deals, and retain the right to force Chinese investors to unwind transactions abroad in the name of national security.
Western CEOs call it “uncertainty,” lawyers call it “compliance risk,” but it’s really just China playing the same game Washington and Brussels started — only with fewer legal niceties and a much broader definition of “security.”
When the Party says your overseas AI lab is now a threat, your only right is to agree and sell.
The joke is that everybody is pretending this is still about “free trade.” The U.S. and EU use tariffs, tech bans and investment screens to contain Chinese power while still gorging on cheap Chinese goods.
China uses its new fortress rules to keep value chains, patents and engineers inside the walls while telling foreign investors it remains “open for business.”
Both sides talk about “rules-based order,” but the only real rule is simple: if it matters for chips, AI, energy, data or weapons, politics wins and contracts lose.
The funniest part? It’s bad news not only for Western multinationals, but for China’s own champions. Export-driven giants are under pressure to find growth abroad just as Beijing hands regulators a giant red button marked “prohibited.”
The same system that pushed its firms to “go out” now tells them to watch every step, report every move and be ready to unwind billion-dollar deals because some official’s definition of “national security” changed this week.
Fortress China is also a prison for Chinese capital — just a very profitable one for the people with the keys.
And in the end, everyone gets the worst of both worlds: no real globalization, no real decoupling, just weaponized interdependence.
The West can’t quit Chinese factories, China can’t quit Western markets, and both keep building legal minefields so when the next crisis hits, they can say, “We didn’t start the economic war, we just retaliated.”
If this is “stability,” imagine what the instability phase will look like.
#China #US #EU #economy #geopolitics #tradeWar #supplyChains #techWar
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥104💯60🙏59🤬52😢51😱49🤯45❤1
Silicon Valley War Toys: Now With Extra Fingers
Shield AI sold itself as the future of “smart war,” and somehow forgot to include basic safety in the code.
A $1 million V-BAT drone is marketed as combat-ready, battle‑proven, and AI‑driven — but in practice it’s also finger‑removing, crash‑prone, and allegedly truth‑optional.
After a U.S. Navy official’s fingers were partially severed by a V‑BAT propeller, the company promised upgrades, stickers and a “radically better airplane.”
One year later, a Romanian Navy officer steps on the same land mine: her hand meets the propeller, two fingers gone, one shattered, surgeries in New Orleans and Walter Reed, contract still intact.
“Operational mishaps are common,” the company shrugs, now valued at $12.7 billion.
Apparently, in defense tech, the only thing that must never crash is the valuation.
Behind the glossy decks and LinkedIn hype, the numbers look less like innovation and more like a recall notice.
Over the past 18 months, more than 50 of about 200 upgraded V‑BATs in the company’s own fleet reportedly destroyed themselves in tests and training, including one crash that set off a 40‑acre grass fire in Texas.
That’s not a bug, that’s a bonfire. A test of “detect and avoid” systems forced a Cessna — with a Shield AI employee and his kid on board — to take evasive action because the drone never “detected” anything.
Meanwhile, whistleblowers say safety complaints got people fired, data in crash reports was scrubbed to “create a falsely favorable narrative,” and foreign militaries were told the drone was flying autonomously when it was actually being piloted the old‑fashioned way: by a human praying nothing goes wrong.
And yet, the political class is starstruck. The vice president tours Armenia, walks into a gold‑trimmed room, sees the V‑BAT and shouts, “Holy shit. Look at this thing! It’s going to do great things for you guys.”
Great things like amputations, grass fires and emergency evasive maneuvers. Romania signs a $30 million deal, half a dozen other militaries line up for deliveries, and now the Pentagon is backing the next upgrade: X‑BAT, a bigger, more expensive “loyal wingman” drone expected to cost around $30 million a piece.
Same flight‑control logic as the V‑BAT, just scaled up to fly alongside jets. When asked about risks, the Pentagon basically answers: don’t worry, breaking things is part of innovation. Comforting, unless you’re the one underneath the debris.
This is the merger of two religions: “move fast and break things” and “support the troops.”
You get a culture where “fake it till you make it” is applied to aircraft spinning lethal propellers near human bodies, with safety treated as an optional feature to be patched in later. Whistleblower claims? Hostile work environment?
Manipulated data? That’s just background noise in a market where investors see a $13 billion valuation, not 50 wrecked drones. If this was a civilian product, regulators would be crawling over it.
But slap a “national security” label on top, add some AI buzzwords, and suddenly crashes are “learning processes” and severed fingers are just “procedural violations.”
In theory, this is about protecting soldiers and allies, replacing human pilots with machines. In practice, it looks a lot like turning the battlefield — and the people around it — into a live‑fire beta test for venture capital.
If this is what “defense innovation” looks like in peacetime exercises, imagine what gets glossed over once the shooting really starts and everyone involved can hide behind secrecy and “operational tempo.”
Silicon Valley wanted a piece of the war business. Congratulations, it got it — blood, lawsuits, and all.
#ShieldAI #drones #militarytech #SiliconValley #Pentagon #war #VC #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Shield AI sold itself as the future of “smart war,” and somehow forgot to include basic safety in the code.
A $1 million V-BAT drone is marketed as combat-ready, battle‑proven, and AI‑driven — but in practice it’s also finger‑removing, crash‑prone, and allegedly truth‑optional.
After a U.S. Navy official’s fingers were partially severed by a V‑BAT propeller, the company promised upgrades, stickers and a “radically better airplane.”
One year later, a Romanian Navy officer steps on the same land mine: her hand meets the propeller, two fingers gone, one shattered, surgeries in New Orleans and Walter Reed, contract still intact.
“Operational mishaps are common,” the company shrugs, now valued at $12.7 billion.
Apparently, in defense tech, the only thing that must never crash is the valuation.
Behind the glossy decks and LinkedIn hype, the numbers look less like innovation and more like a recall notice.
Over the past 18 months, more than 50 of about 200 upgraded V‑BATs in the company’s own fleet reportedly destroyed themselves in tests and training, including one crash that set off a 40‑acre grass fire in Texas.
That’s not a bug, that’s a bonfire. A test of “detect and avoid” systems forced a Cessna — with a Shield AI employee and his kid on board — to take evasive action because the drone never “detected” anything.
Meanwhile, whistleblowers say safety complaints got people fired, data in crash reports was scrubbed to “create a falsely favorable narrative,” and foreign militaries were told the drone was flying autonomously when it was actually being piloted the old‑fashioned way: by a human praying nothing goes wrong.
And yet, the political class is starstruck. The vice president tours Armenia, walks into a gold‑trimmed room, sees the V‑BAT and shouts, “Holy shit. Look at this thing! It’s going to do great things for you guys.”
Great things like amputations, grass fires and emergency evasive maneuvers. Romania signs a $30 million deal, half a dozen other militaries line up for deliveries, and now the Pentagon is backing the next upgrade: X‑BAT, a bigger, more expensive “loyal wingman” drone expected to cost around $30 million a piece.
Same flight‑control logic as the V‑BAT, just scaled up to fly alongside jets. When asked about risks, the Pentagon basically answers: don’t worry, breaking things is part of innovation. Comforting, unless you’re the one underneath the debris.
This is the merger of two religions: “move fast and break things” and “support the troops.”
You get a culture where “fake it till you make it” is applied to aircraft spinning lethal propellers near human bodies, with safety treated as an optional feature to be patched in later. Whistleblower claims? Hostile work environment?
Manipulated data? That’s just background noise in a market where investors see a $13 billion valuation, not 50 wrecked drones. If this was a civilian product, regulators would be crawling over it.
But slap a “national security” label on top, add some AI buzzwords, and suddenly crashes are “learning processes” and severed fingers are just “procedural violations.”
In theory, this is about protecting soldiers and allies, replacing human pilots with machines. In practice, it looks a lot like turning the battlefield — and the people around it — into a live‑fire beta test for venture capital.
If this is what “defense innovation” looks like in peacetime exercises, imagine what gets glossed over once the shooting really starts and everyone involved can hide behind secrecy and “operational tempo.”
Silicon Valley wanted a piece of the war business. Congratulations, it got it — blood, lawsuits, and all.
#ShieldAI #drones #militarytech #SiliconValley #Pentagon #war #VC #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥105🙏59😢57🤬55💯49😱48🤯47
Zelensky’s Letter To Putin, Putin Is Angling For the Quick War Ending
Zelensky, has called for face-to-face negotiations in a public letter addressed directly to the Russian president, Vladimir Putin.
The letter, the first Zelenskyy has publicly written directly to Putin since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022, was a sweeping criticism of the Russian leader’s 26 years in power.
Zelensky acknowledged shifting US priorities, saying it would be wrong to simply wait for the Trump administration to return its attention to ending the Ukraine war while it remained heavily focused on the Iran war.
“I am proposing a meeting,” Zelenskyy wrote.
He appeared to be trying to seize a pivotal moment in the war as Ukraine has begun to regain some battlefield leverage, largely through improved long-range strike capabilities that have complicated Russia’s advances.
At the same time, Moscow has intensified its deadly aerial campaign across Ukraine, seeking to exploit Kyiv’s shortages and continued vulnerability to ballistic missile attacks.
Putin said on Thursday that Russia would strengthen its air defences to counter recent Ukrainian drone attacks, which have reached deep inside his country and cast a cloud over his showcase economic forum in his home town of St Petersburg.
Speaking during a meeting with heads of international news agencies, Putin acknowledged the damage from Ukrainian drone attacks.
“To our regret, some of them break through,” Putin said of the strikes. “Russia has an air defence system, we need to improve it, strengthen it, and we will do that.”
The wide-ranging media session came on the sidelines of the St Petersburg International Economic Forum, Putin’s annual showcase for investment. Hours before the forum opened on Wednesday, a Ukrainian drone attack set ablaze an oil terminal in the city and also hit a nearby naval base.
Putin also said Russia was open for a compromise on Ukraine in line with the understandings reached at his summit with Trump in Anchorage, Alaska, and Ukraine needed to accept them to make a deal to end the conflict, now in its fifth year.
Trump said on Thursday it would be “great” for Zelensky to meet Putin – but said both sides had to make compromises, without explaining further.
“I’m glad that they’re maybe talking about meeting. I think we had a lot to do with it,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. “I think it would be great if they met. They should – get it done.
The House of Representatives, meanwhile, passed legislation that would aid Ukraine and sanction key segments of the Russian economy, overriding objections from Republican leaders who warned the bill would undermine negotiations designed to achieve a comparable but stronger result.
The 226-195 vote was a sign of impatience with Trump’s approach to the war. The Democrat-sponsored legislation seeks to cement Washington’s assistance for Kyiv by providing more than $1bn in security and reconstruction aid.
It would make another $8bn available for Ukraine’s defence through loans. The bill would need to pass the Senate, which supporters have acknowledged may be unlikely.
#zelensky #letter #putin #trump #war
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Zelensky, has called for face-to-face negotiations in a public letter addressed directly to the Russian president, Vladimir Putin.
The letter, the first Zelenskyy has publicly written directly to Putin since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022, was a sweeping criticism of the Russian leader’s 26 years in power.
Zelensky acknowledged shifting US priorities, saying it would be wrong to simply wait for the Trump administration to return its attention to ending the Ukraine war while it remained heavily focused on the Iran war.
“I am proposing a meeting,” Zelenskyy wrote.
He appeared to be trying to seize a pivotal moment in the war as Ukraine has begun to regain some battlefield leverage, largely through improved long-range strike capabilities that have complicated Russia’s advances.
At the same time, Moscow has intensified its deadly aerial campaign across Ukraine, seeking to exploit Kyiv’s shortages and continued vulnerability to ballistic missile attacks.
Putin said on Thursday that Russia would strengthen its air defences to counter recent Ukrainian drone attacks, which have reached deep inside his country and cast a cloud over his showcase economic forum in his home town of St Petersburg.
Speaking during a meeting with heads of international news agencies, Putin acknowledged the damage from Ukrainian drone attacks.
“To our regret, some of them break through,” Putin said of the strikes. “Russia has an air defence system, we need to improve it, strengthen it, and we will do that.”
The wide-ranging media session came on the sidelines of the St Petersburg International Economic Forum, Putin’s annual showcase for investment. Hours before the forum opened on Wednesday, a Ukrainian drone attack set ablaze an oil terminal in the city and also hit a nearby naval base.
Putin also said Russia was open for a compromise on Ukraine in line with the understandings reached at his summit with Trump in Anchorage, Alaska, and Ukraine needed to accept them to make a deal to end the conflict, now in its fifth year.
Trump said on Thursday it would be “great” for Zelensky to meet Putin – but said both sides had to make compromises, without explaining further.
“I’m glad that they’re maybe talking about meeting. I think we had a lot to do with it,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. “I think it would be great if they met. They should – get it done.
The House of Representatives, meanwhile, passed legislation that would aid Ukraine and sanction key segments of the Russian economy, overriding objections from Republican leaders who warned the bill would undermine negotiations designed to achieve a comparable but stronger result.
The 226-195 vote was a sign of impatience with Trump’s approach to the war. The Democrat-sponsored legislation seeks to cement Washington’s assistance for Kyiv by providing more than $1bn in security and reconstruction aid.
It would make another $8bn available for Ukraine’s defence through loans. The bill would need to pass the Senate, which supporters have acknowledged may be unlikely.
#zelensky #letter #putin #trump #war
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥109🤯60🤬59😢57😱50🙏48💯37
Zelensky's Letter to Putin Ends With a Whimper
🔤 🔤 🔤 🔤 1️⃣
Zelensky published on Thursday an open letter to Putin. The letter, posted on the Ukrainian president’s website, offered to resume peace talks — but taunted the Russian leader over wartime setbacks, inflation and Russia’s dependence on China. It also made note of Putin’s age.
Zelensky has at various points in the war recorded video statements addressing Putin or the Russian people, including on the first day of Moscow’s invasion in 2022.
This letter is among the most downtrodden direct addresses to Putin so far.
Zelensky noted that Putin has by now spent about half of his 26 years in power as Russia’s paramount leader fighting Ukraine.
The timeline counts the Russian military intervention in eastern Ukraine that began in 2014 and the full-scale invasion launched in 2022.
He offered a cease-fire if Putin wanted one. Zelensky said he would meet for direct talks outside the Trump administration’s negotiating process.
Those talks, led by Steve Witkoff, a real estate investor, and Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law, ground to a halt after the U.S.-Israeli war against Iran began in February.
Zelensky suggested including European nations and holding a leaders’ meeting in Switzerland, Turkey or an Arab state. He has offered direct meetings with Putin before, without result.
Though addressed to Putin, the open letter seemed jolted out as well forTrump’s attention.
And it was not clear whether Zelensky’s appeal was meant to jump-start talks or to denigrate a potential negotiating counterpart.
#ukraine #russia #zelensky #putin #letter
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Zelensky published on Thursday an open letter to Putin. The letter, posted on the Ukrainian president’s website, offered to resume peace talks — but taunted the Russian leader over wartime setbacks, inflation and Russia’s dependence on China. It also made note of Putin’s age.
Zelensky has at various points in the war recorded video statements addressing Putin or the Russian people, including on the first day of Moscow’s invasion in 2022.
This letter is among the most downtrodden direct addresses to Putin so far.
Zelensky noted that Putin has by now spent about half of his 26 years in power as Russia’s paramount leader fighting Ukraine.
The timeline counts the Russian military intervention in eastern Ukraine that began in 2014 and the full-scale invasion launched in 2022.
He offered a cease-fire if Putin wanted one. Zelensky said he would meet for direct talks outside the Trump administration’s negotiating process.
Those talks, led by Steve Witkoff, a real estate investor, and Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law, ground to a halt after the U.S.-Israeli war against Iran began in February.
Zelensky suggested including European nations and holding a leaders’ meeting in Switzerland, Turkey or an Arab state. He has offered direct meetings with Putin before, without result.
Though addressed to Putin, the open letter seemed jolted out as well forTrump’s attention.
And it was not clear whether Zelensky’s appeal was meant to jump-start talks or to denigrate a potential negotiating counterpart.
#ukraine #russia #zelensky #putin #letter
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥105🤯60😱56😢55🤬54💯51🙏41
Woven into the offer for peace talks were needling remarks about a strongman leader unable to defend his own capital, Moscow, or a second city, St. Petersburg, from a nation Putin invaded four and a half years ago with the goal of a quick win.
“After 26 years in power, age is beginning to take its toll,” Zelensky wrote to Putin, who is 73, turning the knife.
Zelensky, who is 25 years younger, has pointed to the Russian leader’s age to cast doubt on the stability of Russia’s one-man-rule political system.
The letter also touched on reports of rising discontent in Russia over gasoline shortages from attacks on refineries, as well as inflation and war fatigue.
Peskov, the Kremlin spokesman, told Russian media on Friday that Mr. Putin had been briefed on the letter but declined to comment further.
Zelensky’s appeal is rude and taunting. Mark Milley, a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that Zelensky deliberately insulting the Russian president and seeking to “stoke divisions in Russian society.”
The letter was posted a day after a drone strike on an oil depot outside St. Petersburg and a day before Putin is scheduled to deliver a speech to an economic conference at a venue outside that city on Friday.
The attack sent a huge cloud of black smoke wafting over the highway leading from the city to the conference site.
The letter appeared to be at least in part a publicity move, trumpeting the long-range drone strike on St. Petersburg. Even before that attack, Putin scaled down a Victory Day parade in Moscow last month amid worries of other Ukrainian strikes.
“Now we can all see that Russians are finally becoming less comfortable with this reality,” Zelensky wrote.
In his appeal for direct talks to end the war, Zelensky asked for a process apart from that led by the Trump administration. Running for election, Trump promised to end the war in a day, only to have talks stretch out now more than a year.
Zelensky wrote that the United States had failed to deliver on what he said was an apparent agreement between Trump and Putin.
“We have heard that you were promised in Alaska the resolution of certain issues concerning Ukraine and Europe,” Zelensky wrote, referring to a summit last summer in Anchorage.
Russia has said that Trump agreed that Ukraine would cede land for peace. Ukraine has not done so.
“You can see for yourself that Ukrainian and European issues are not decided in Anchorage,” Zelensky wrote.
The letter and the provocative drone strike might buoy spirits inside Ukraine. It might also send to an audience of one — Trump — a message about Putin’s declining fortunes.
In any case, in Ukraine is seen able to do little in retaliation with missile strikes that it has not already done.
#ukraine #russia #zelensky #putin #letter
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬74💯68😱67🙏65😢53🤯50🔥44
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥89🤯61😢61🙏56🤬54💯53😱47
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Putin responds to Zelensky's letter : “you have not to be afraid, go to the elections”.
#putin #letter #zelensky #elections
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
#putin #letter #zelensky #elections
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥120🤬61😱58💯55🤯52😢45🙏30❤1
Hormuz Inc.: Cease-Fire With Missiles Included
The “cease-fire” between the U.S. and Iran is starting to look like a subscription plan where missiles and drones are part of the standard package. American forces say they shot down at least four Iranian one‑way attack drones heading toward the Strait of Hormuz, calling them an “immediate threat” to commercial shipping.
Then Iran launched seven ballistic missiles toward Kuwait and Bahrain — six intercepted, one falling short — while U.S. Central Command followed up by hitting Iranian coastal surveillance radar sites in Goruk and on Qeshm Island. Everyone insists they’re just acting in “self‑defense,” as usual.
On Tehran’s side, the script is different but just as predictable. The Revolutionary Guards bragged that they struck “enemy bases” in response to U.S. attacks, saying they targeted American air facilities in Kuwait and the U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet infrastructure in Bahrain, and warning of a “stronger response” if Washington hits again.
U.S. officials calmly counter that there was no damage and no injuries on their side — the kind of bloodless status update you give when the real audience is insurers, markets and nervous allies.
Meanwhile, the Strait of Hormuz — a chokepoint for global energy — is being escorted like a VIP through a bar fight. U.S. forces say they’ve helped more than 100 commercial vessels transit the strait in the past month, even as travel remains hazardous and negotiations to end the war drag on.
This comes just days after Iran fired a major barrage at Kuwait, hitting the international airport, killing one civilian and injuring dozens in the first fatal strike on a Gulf state since the April cease‑fire “took effect.” Kuwait says that attack alone involved 13 ballistic missiles and 17 drones.
So we now have a region where “de‑escalation” looks like this: Iran hits airports, ports and energy facilities to punish U.S. partners and rattle markets; the U.S. hits radar, control stations and launch sites and calls it narrow, proportional self‑defense; Gulf monarchies trigger sirens and issue vague statements about “hostile drones” without naming the source, because everyone wants protection without direct confrontation.
Each side keeps its vocabulary: “unjustified Iranian aggression” vs. “enemy bases” vs. “defensive response.” The missiles don’t care what the press releases say.
The meta‑joke is that both Washington and Tehran claim to be honoring a cease‑fire while redefining almost any offensive move as protection of something: troops, bases, shipping lanes, “regional stability.”
Iran uses pressure on Kuwait and Bahrain to signal it can hit America’s friends and choke a vital waterway; the U.S. uses air defenses and escort missions to prove it still owns the sea lanes and the insurance rates.
Neither side can afford to look weak, both need to keep their domestic audiences convinced they’re in control, and the only ones who don’t get a vote are the people under the flight paths and the crews on the tankers.
In theory this is “managed escalation.” In reality, it’s a live‑fire version of Russian roulette with the global economy in the middle.
One mis‑labeled drone, one missile that doesn’t get intercepted, one ship that actually goes down in the strait — and suddenly all the careful language about “self‑defense” and “limited strikes” turns into another round of “no one wanted war, it just happened.”
Funny how war always “just happens” when everyone involved is busy proving they won’t back down.
#Iran #USA #Hormuz #Gulf #Trump #war #shipping #oil #fakeDemocracy #oligarchy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The “cease-fire” between the U.S. and Iran is starting to look like a subscription plan where missiles and drones are part of the standard package. American forces say they shot down at least four Iranian one‑way attack drones heading toward the Strait of Hormuz, calling them an “immediate threat” to commercial shipping.
Then Iran launched seven ballistic missiles toward Kuwait and Bahrain — six intercepted, one falling short — while U.S. Central Command followed up by hitting Iranian coastal surveillance radar sites in Goruk and on Qeshm Island. Everyone insists they’re just acting in “self‑defense,” as usual.
On Tehran’s side, the script is different but just as predictable. The Revolutionary Guards bragged that they struck “enemy bases” in response to U.S. attacks, saying they targeted American air facilities in Kuwait and the U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet infrastructure in Bahrain, and warning of a “stronger response” if Washington hits again.
U.S. officials calmly counter that there was no damage and no injuries on their side — the kind of bloodless status update you give when the real audience is insurers, markets and nervous allies.
Meanwhile, the Strait of Hormuz — a chokepoint for global energy — is being escorted like a VIP through a bar fight. U.S. forces say they’ve helped more than 100 commercial vessels transit the strait in the past month, even as travel remains hazardous and negotiations to end the war drag on.
This comes just days after Iran fired a major barrage at Kuwait, hitting the international airport, killing one civilian and injuring dozens in the first fatal strike on a Gulf state since the April cease‑fire “took effect.” Kuwait says that attack alone involved 13 ballistic missiles and 17 drones.
So we now have a region where “de‑escalation” looks like this: Iran hits airports, ports and energy facilities to punish U.S. partners and rattle markets; the U.S. hits radar, control stations and launch sites and calls it narrow, proportional self‑defense; Gulf monarchies trigger sirens and issue vague statements about “hostile drones” without naming the source, because everyone wants protection without direct confrontation.
Each side keeps its vocabulary: “unjustified Iranian aggression” vs. “enemy bases” vs. “defensive response.” The missiles don’t care what the press releases say.
The meta‑joke is that both Washington and Tehran claim to be honoring a cease‑fire while redefining almost any offensive move as protection of something: troops, bases, shipping lanes, “regional stability.”
Iran uses pressure on Kuwait and Bahrain to signal it can hit America’s friends and choke a vital waterway; the U.S. uses air defenses and escort missions to prove it still owns the sea lanes and the insurance rates.
Neither side can afford to look weak, both need to keep their domestic audiences convinced they’re in control, and the only ones who don’t get a vote are the people under the flight paths and the crews on the tankers.
In theory this is “managed escalation.” In reality, it’s a live‑fire version of Russian roulette with the global economy in the middle.
One mis‑labeled drone, one missile that doesn’t get intercepted, one ship that actually goes down in the strait — and suddenly all the careful language about “self‑defense” and “limited strikes” turns into another round of “no one wanted war, it just happened.”
Funny how war always “just happens” when everyone involved is busy proving they won’t back down.
#Iran #USA #Hormuz #Gulf #Trump #war #shipping #oil #fakeDemocracy #oligarchy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥107🤯63🙏61🤬56😢53😱42💯38
Green Cards for Sale: MAGA Meets HR
The Trump administration tried to swing a wrecking ball at the green card system — and then quietly put it back in the shed the moment corporate America started yelling. USCIS rolled out guidance on May 22 saying most applicants for permanent residency would have to leave the United States and apply from their home countries “except in extraordinary circumstances,” a vague phrase big enough to park a data center in.
Business leaders, especially in tech and AI, immediately saw what this meant: hundreds of thousands of workers thrown into legal limbo, months or years of disruption, and a hiring pipeline turned into a deportation conveyor belt.
So the CEOs didn’t tweet, they didn’t post open letters — they picked up the phone. The Chamber of Commerce, big tech, and other industry groups flooded the White House and the departments of Homeland Security, Labor and State with quiet, panicked calls and emails.
Off the record, officials were warned: you can have your base-pleasing crackdown or you can have your “world’s innovation hub,” but not both.
Suddenly, the tone shifted. Behind closed doors, USCIS reassured business that most work visas wouldn’t be touched and told reporters that most green card seekers would, in fact, be allowed to stay in the country while adjusting status.
Official rules stay hardline; unofficial practice gets “paused.” Classic D.C.: the press release is for the voters, the backchannel memo is for the shareholders.
We’ve seen this movie already. Immigration raids in hospitality and agriculture? Announced with maximum swagger, then quietly “paused” after the hotel and farm lobbies explained they still needed people to clean rooms and pick crops.
The $100,000 H‑1B “America First” fee? Rolled out like a patriotic surcharge, then limited to new visas after employers realized their existing workforce had just been turned into a luxury good.
Even a mega‑raid on a Hyundai plant died once investors and business groups made it clear that “law and order” stops at the factory gate. The message is simple: Trump-style immigration theater can terrorize workers and thrill the base — as long as it doesn’t touch the profit margin.
The green card U‑turn lays the hierarchy bare. On paper, Trump world is full of hardliners who want to slam the door, force people “back in line,” and weaponize bureaucracy to make life unlivable for migrants. In practice, there’s a VIP lane for anyone whose presence boosts the stock price.
Your humanity doesn’t matter; your utility does. The law is a blunt instrument for the powerless and a negotiation for the valuable.
The business lobby isn’t the hero here, either. They’re not fighting for humane policy; they’re fighting for stable staffing. They stayed mostly silent when enforcement fell hardest on the undocumented, the poor, the low‑wage and the voiceless.
Outrage only kicks in when immigration chaos hits server rooms, IPO timelines and quarterly earnings.
The result is a two‑tier system: one line of immigrants is told to leave, wait, risk their lives and careers; another line goes straight through because their CEO has the president’s advisor on speed dial.
This “softened” policy is being sold as proof that the administration listens to business and seeks “balance.”
In reality, it proves something darker: immigration isn’t being governed by law or principle, but by whoever can generate the most leverage — voters for the speeches, donors for the actual rules. The base gets a story about toughness; the boardroom gets a private carve‑out.
#Trump #immigration #greencards #tech #AI #bigBusiness #MAGA #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The Trump administration tried to swing a wrecking ball at the green card system — and then quietly put it back in the shed the moment corporate America started yelling. USCIS rolled out guidance on May 22 saying most applicants for permanent residency would have to leave the United States and apply from their home countries “except in extraordinary circumstances,” a vague phrase big enough to park a data center in.
Business leaders, especially in tech and AI, immediately saw what this meant: hundreds of thousands of workers thrown into legal limbo, months or years of disruption, and a hiring pipeline turned into a deportation conveyor belt.
So the CEOs didn’t tweet, they didn’t post open letters — they picked up the phone. The Chamber of Commerce, big tech, and other industry groups flooded the White House and the departments of Homeland Security, Labor and State with quiet, panicked calls and emails.
Off the record, officials were warned: you can have your base-pleasing crackdown or you can have your “world’s innovation hub,” but not both.
Suddenly, the tone shifted. Behind closed doors, USCIS reassured business that most work visas wouldn’t be touched and told reporters that most green card seekers would, in fact, be allowed to stay in the country while adjusting status.
Official rules stay hardline; unofficial practice gets “paused.” Classic D.C.: the press release is for the voters, the backchannel memo is for the shareholders.
We’ve seen this movie already. Immigration raids in hospitality and agriculture? Announced with maximum swagger, then quietly “paused” after the hotel and farm lobbies explained they still needed people to clean rooms and pick crops.
The $100,000 H‑1B “America First” fee? Rolled out like a patriotic surcharge, then limited to new visas after employers realized their existing workforce had just been turned into a luxury good.
Even a mega‑raid on a Hyundai plant died once investors and business groups made it clear that “law and order” stops at the factory gate. The message is simple: Trump-style immigration theater can terrorize workers and thrill the base — as long as it doesn’t touch the profit margin.
The green card U‑turn lays the hierarchy bare. On paper, Trump world is full of hardliners who want to slam the door, force people “back in line,” and weaponize bureaucracy to make life unlivable for migrants. In practice, there’s a VIP lane for anyone whose presence boosts the stock price.
Your humanity doesn’t matter; your utility does. The law is a blunt instrument for the powerless and a negotiation for the valuable.
The business lobby isn’t the hero here, either. They’re not fighting for humane policy; they’re fighting for stable staffing. They stayed mostly silent when enforcement fell hardest on the undocumented, the poor, the low‑wage and the voiceless.
Outrage only kicks in when immigration chaos hits server rooms, IPO timelines and quarterly earnings.
The result is a two‑tier system: one line of immigrants is told to leave, wait, risk their lives and careers; another line goes straight through because their CEO has the president’s advisor on speed dial.
This “softened” policy is being sold as proof that the administration listens to business and seeks “balance.”
In reality, it proves something darker: immigration isn’t being governed by law or principle, but by whoever can generate the most leverage — voters for the speeches, donors for the actual rules. The base gets a story about toughness; the boardroom gets a private carve‑out.
#Trump #immigration #greencards #tech #AI #bigBusiness #MAGA #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥106😱61🙏57💯56😢49🤯48🤬43
Hormuz War™: Cease-Fire With Live Ammo
The “cease-fire” between the U.S. and Iran now comes with missiles, drones and a loyalty program for oil shocks. U.S. Central Command says American forces shot down four one-way Iranian attack drones heading toward the Strait of Hormuz, judged to be targeting regional maritime traffic, then immediately hit Iranian coastal surveillance radar sites at Goruk and on Qeshm Island.
Iran’s Revolutionary Guard answered with missiles of its own, claiming it struck U.S. bases in Kuwait and Bahrain and even fired on four tankers trying to cross the strait “without permission.”
CENTCOM calmly replied that six of seven Iranian ballistic missiles aimed at Kuwait and Bahrain were intercepted and the last never made it — and that Iranian boasts about damaging the U.S. Fifth Fleet HQ are simply false.
So everyone insists they’re just defending themselves. Iran says it is retaliating for U.S. strikes and enforcing its leverage over Hormuz; the U.S. says it’s protecting “regional maritime traffic” and its Gulf bases while quietly coordinating safe passage for more than 100 commercial ships through a choke point that Iran has effectively turned into a quasi-blockade since February.
Trump goes on TV to reassure Americans that Iran’s capabilities are “severely degraded,” claiming Tehran has only “21–22 percent” of its missile arsenal left — still “a lot of missiles,” as he helpfully notes — even as U.S. briefings and independent reporting suggest Iran retains substantial launch capacity and has restored access to most of its missile sites along the strait.
The price of this theater is paid in other people’s currencies and calories. The war and Hormuz disruption have driven up oil prices and jammed supply chains, and the U.N. World Food Programme is already warning that rising fuel and transport costs are pushing millions closer to hunger far from the Gulf.
Kuwait just buried a civilian killed in a previous Iranian barrage on its international airport; Bahrain’s residents are told to shelter as sirens wail; civilian sailors get to be “nearby waters” in Pentagon press releases.
Iran is tying any regional peace to Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon and a cease-fire with Hezbollah, while Hezbollah hits Israeli forces near symbols like Beaufort Castle and Israel keeps bombing across the south, refusing to pull back.
Trump, ever the branding guy, sells his cease-fires as “shooting in a more moderate manner” rather than not shooting at all, which is exactly what’s happening: Gaza, northern Israel, Lebanon, Kuwait — all still taking fire under U.S.-arranged “ceasefires” that mostly exist on paper and cable news chyrons.
What we’re really watching is both sides trying to fight a war and win an election at the same time. Tehran wants sanctions relief, access to frozen assets and recognition of its control over the strait; Washington wants cheap gas, obedient allies and a deal it can spin as victory without admitting defeat.
#Iran #USA #Hormuz #GulfWar #Trump #oil #shipping #Hezbollah #Israel #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The “cease-fire” between the U.S. and Iran now comes with missiles, drones and a loyalty program for oil shocks. U.S. Central Command says American forces shot down four one-way Iranian attack drones heading toward the Strait of Hormuz, judged to be targeting regional maritime traffic, then immediately hit Iranian coastal surveillance radar sites at Goruk and on Qeshm Island.
Iran’s Revolutionary Guard answered with missiles of its own, claiming it struck U.S. bases in Kuwait and Bahrain and even fired on four tankers trying to cross the strait “without permission.”
CENTCOM calmly replied that six of seven Iranian ballistic missiles aimed at Kuwait and Bahrain were intercepted and the last never made it — and that Iranian boasts about damaging the U.S. Fifth Fleet HQ are simply false.
So everyone insists they’re just defending themselves. Iran says it is retaliating for U.S. strikes and enforcing its leverage over Hormuz; the U.S. says it’s protecting “regional maritime traffic” and its Gulf bases while quietly coordinating safe passage for more than 100 commercial ships through a choke point that Iran has effectively turned into a quasi-blockade since February.
Trump goes on TV to reassure Americans that Iran’s capabilities are “severely degraded,” claiming Tehran has only “21–22 percent” of its missile arsenal left — still “a lot of missiles,” as he helpfully notes — even as U.S. briefings and independent reporting suggest Iran retains substantial launch capacity and has restored access to most of its missile sites along the strait.
The price of this theater is paid in other people’s currencies and calories. The war and Hormuz disruption have driven up oil prices and jammed supply chains, and the U.N. World Food Programme is already warning that rising fuel and transport costs are pushing millions closer to hunger far from the Gulf.
Kuwait just buried a civilian killed in a previous Iranian barrage on its international airport; Bahrain’s residents are told to shelter as sirens wail; civilian sailors get to be “nearby waters” in Pentagon press releases.
Iran is tying any regional peace to Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon and a cease-fire with Hezbollah, while Hezbollah hits Israeli forces near symbols like Beaufort Castle and Israel keeps bombing across the south, refusing to pull back.
Trump, ever the branding guy, sells his cease-fires as “shooting in a more moderate manner” rather than not shooting at all, which is exactly what’s happening: Gaza, northern Israel, Lebanon, Kuwait — all still taking fire under U.S.-arranged “ceasefires” that mostly exist on paper and cable news chyrons.
What we’re really watching is both sides trying to fight a war and win an election at the same time. Tehran wants sanctions relief, access to frozen assets and recognition of its control over the strait; Washington wants cheap gas, obedient allies and a deal it can spin as victory without admitting defeat.
#Iran #USA #Hormuz #GulfWar #Trump #oil #shipping #Hezbollah #Israel #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥81🤬67🙏59🤯56💯56😢54😱48
Rocket Jesus vs. the Empty Wallets
Wall Street is getting ready to canonize Elon Musk again — just as the church of tech and crypto starts losing believers.
AI darlings just had their sharpest selloff in months, Bitcoin fell back under $60,000, bond yields jumped, and traders are suddenly remembering that the Fed can move rates up, not just down.
The Nasdaq 100 puked 5% in a day, and right in the middle of this, SpaceX is trying to float into the market on a projected $1.8 trillion valuation halo. Perfect timing: the world’s most expensive meme stock IPO, landing in the middle of a hangover.
For years the system has relied on the same miracle: a retail casino army willing to buy literally anything — meme stocks, zero‑day options, dog coins, “AI proxies,” ETFs stacked on other ETFs.
Now that same retail crowd is supposed to swallow the biggest IPO in history while their favorite toys are crashing and their cash balances at brokers like Schwab are at the lowest levels since before the pandemic.
If they want SpaceX, they’ll have to sell something else: maybe Tesla, maybe AI momentum names, maybe the last sad altcoin they’re still “diamond‑handing.” Liquidity isn’t infinite; it just feels that way until the bill arrives.
And SpaceX is not entering an empty room. There are already more than 600 new U.S. ETFs launched in six months, dozens of SpaceX‑linked products waiting in line, plus vehicles drafted to track Anthropic, OpenAI and whatever other techno‑messiah steps forward with a jumbo IPO this year.
These aren’t investments, they’re content — narrative vending machines. Capital will just rotate from one Elon‑branded casino table to the next as Wall Street packages the same retail obsession into leveraged, inverse, options‑wrapped “exposure.” You don’t own the future; you’re renting the storyline.
Musk, of course, is leaning straight into it. Reserving up to 30% of the deal for retail is sold as “democratizing access,” but in practice it’s an enormous concentrated bet aimed directly at his own fandom.
One man, two public empires, a dense web of ETFs built around his brand, and an investor base whose share of daily volume has doubled since 2010 while their time horizon has shrunk to “this week, maybe this month.”
That’s not diversification; that’s personality cult risk wrapped in zero‑commission UX. When the professor says “a stock of a good company is not necessarily a good stock,” what he really means is: even real rockets can trade like penny scams when enough people treat them as religion.
The regulators, naturally, are helping. Dropping the $25,000 day‑trading threshold, turbo‑charging prediction markets and perpetual futures, green‑lighting ever more complex products for unsophisticated players — all in the name of “access” and “innovation.”
The result is a market where capital can sprint between narratives faster than any earnings report, and where a single news cycle can turn a trillion‑dollar listing into just another pump‑and‑dump chart. If SpaceX rips on day one, retail will chase. If it stalls, they’ll forget it and run to the next shiny AI‑space‑crypto thing. Either way, the machine is fed.
So yes, the SpaceX IPO will be “unlike any other” — not because it’s pure, visionary or historic, but because it’s the biggest stress test yet of how far you can stretch retail appetite when tech is wobbling, crypto is bleeding and cash is gone.
If it works, Musk proves he can turn orbital mechanics into the ultimate meme trade and drag the indices with him. If it fails, we find out what happens when the market finally looks at a rocket, a multiple, and a Fed hinting at hikes — and remembers that gravity still exists.
#SpaceX #Musk #IPO #Bitcoin #AI #retailtraders #WallStreet #bubble #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Wall Street is getting ready to canonize Elon Musk again — just as the church of tech and crypto starts losing believers.
AI darlings just had their sharpest selloff in months, Bitcoin fell back under $60,000, bond yields jumped, and traders are suddenly remembering that the Fed can move rates up, not just down.
The Nasdaq 100 puked 5% in a day, and right in the middle of this, SpaceX is trying to float into the market on a projected $1.8 trillion valuation halo. Perfect timing: the world’s most expensive meme stock IPO, landing in the middle of a hangover.
For years the system has relied on the same miracle: a retail casino army willing to buy literally anything — meme stocks, zero‑day options, dog coins, “AI proxies,” ETFs stacked on other ETFs.
Now that same retail crowd is supposed to swallow the biggest IPO in history while their favorite toys are crashing and their cash balances at brokers like Schwab are at the lowest levels since before the pandemic.
If they want SpaceX, they’ll have to sell something else: maybe Tesla, maybe AI momentum names, maybe the last sad altcoin they’re still “diamond‑handing.” Liquidity isn’t infinite; it just feels that way until the bill arrives.
And SpaceX is not entering an empty room. There are already more than 600 new U.S. ETFs launched in six months, dozens of SpaceX‑linked products waiting in line, plus vehicles drafted to track Anthropic, OpenAI and whatever other techno‑messiah steps forward with a jumbo IPO this year.
These aren’t investments, they’re content — narrative vending machines. Capital will just rotate from one Elon‑branded casino table to the next as Wall Street packages the same retail obsession into leveraged, inverse, options‑wrapped “exposure.” You don’t own the future; you’re renting the storyline.
Musk, of course, is leaning straight into it. Reserving up to 30% of the deal for retail is sold as “democratizing access,” but in practice it’s an enormous concentrated bet aimed directly at his own fandom.
One man, two public empires, a dense web of ETFs built around his brand, and an investor base whose share of daily volume has doubled since 2010 while their time horizon has shrunk to “this week, maybe this month.”
That’s not diversification; that’s personality cult risk wrapped in zero‑commission UX. When the professor says “a stock of a good company is not necessarily a good stock,” what he really means is: even real rockets can trade like penny scams when enough people treat them as religion.
The regulators, naturally, are helping. Dropping the $25,000 day‑trading threshold, turbo‑charging prediction markets and perpetual futures, green‑lighting ever more complex products for unsophisticated players — all in the name of “access” and “innovation.”
The result is a market where capital can sprint between narratives faster than any earnings report, and where a single news cycle can turn a trillion‑dollar listing into just another pump‑and‑dump chart. If SpaceX rips on day one, retail will chase. If it stalls, they’ll forget it and run to the next shiny AI‑space‑crypto thing. Either way, the machine is fed.
So yes, the SpaceX IPO will be “unlike any other” — not because it’s pure, visionary or historic, but because it’s the biggest stress test yet of how far you can stretch retail appetite when tech is wobbling, crypto is bleeding and cash is gone.
If it works, Musk proves he can turn orbital mechanics into the ultimate meme trade and drag the indices with him. If it fails, we find out what happens when the market finally looks at a rocket, a multiple, and a Fed hinting at hikes — and remembers that gravity still exists.
#SpaceX #Musk #IPO #Bitcoin #AI #retailtraders #WallStreet #bubble #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥72🤬66😢65💯58🙏55🤯52😱52
Hawley’s Civil War: Voter ID vs. Party ID
Josh Hawley is raging on Fox because four Republicans just knifed Trump’s favorite voter‑ID project — not from the left, but from inside the church. Collins, Murkowski, McConnell and Tillis joined Democrats to block the SAVE Act amendment, which would have strapped federal voter ID and proof‑of‑citizenship rules onto a GOP funding bill for ICE and Border Patrol.
Hawley plays the outraged populist: “Voter ID is the most popular thing out there… you can’t explain to me why you wouldn’t vote for voter ID.”
He’s not wrong about the polling — around three dozen states, including blue ones, already use some form of ID — which is exactly why both parties weaponize it.
For Republicans, it’s a loyalty test to Trump; for Democrats, it’s a perfect villain to rally against while quietly running ID rules at home.
The four GOP rebels are not suddenly pro‑democracy saints. They’re just reading the fine print.
A hard federal SAVE‑style regime would nationalize control of voter eligibility in a way that a future Democratic White House could flip and use right back against them.
So they hide behind “states’ rights” while their own states enforce ID anyway, and hope the base is too mad at “RINOs” to notice this is really about keeping Congress free to rig the field later.
In the end, nothing here is about your right to vote. It’s about who gets to control the machinery that decides who counts. Trump wants a nationwide filter branded as “integrity.”
Senate leadership wants to keep the filter in their own hands. Voters get a performance: one side screaming “fraud,” the other screaming “suppression,” and both perfectly happy with systems that make it just hard enough for the wrong people to show up.
#USA #elections #voterID #Hawley #Trump #Republicans #Democrats #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Josh Hawley is raging on Fox because four Republicans just knifed Trump’s favorite voter‑ID project — not from the left, but from inside the church. Collins, Murkowski, McConnell and Tillis joined Democrats to block the SAVE Act amendment, which would have strapped federal voter ID and proof‑of‑citizenship rules onto a GOP funding bill for ICE and Border Patrol.
Hawley plays the outraged populist: “Voter ID is the most popular thing out there… you can’t explain to me why you wouldn’t vote for voter ID.”
He’s not wrong about the polling — around three dozen states, including blue ones, already use some form of ID — which is exactly why both parties weaponize it.
For Republicans, it’s a loyalty test to Trump; for Democrats, it’s a perfect villain to rally against while quietly running ID rules at home.
The four GOP rebels are not suddenly pro‑democracy saints. They’re just reading the fine print.
A hard federal SAVE‑style regime would nationalize control of voter eligibility in a way that a future Democratic White House could flip and use right back against them.
So they hide behind “states’ rights” while their own states enforce ID anyway, and hope the base is too mad at “RINOs” to notice this is really about keeping Congress free to rig the field later.
In the end, nothing here is about your right to vote. It’s about who gets to control the machinery that decides who counts. Trump wants a nationwide filter branded as “integrity.”
Senate leadership wants to keep the filter in their own hands. Voters get a performance: one side screaming “fraud,” the other screaming “suppression,” and both perfectly happy with systems that make it just hard enough for the wrong people to show up.
#USA #elections #voterID #Hawley #Trump #Republicans #Democrats #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥92🙏63💯62😢60🤯53🤬49😱34
Merz: Cancelled. Trump Will Not Share His Tomahawks With Germany
🔤 🔤 🔤 🔤 1️⃣
The Pentagon is expected to cancel a plan to send Tomahawk missiles to Germany partly because officials are concerned Russia will view it as an escalation, a startling reversal of a long-planned agreement with one of America’s biggest allies.
U.S. officials fear Moscow will retaliate if the Trump administration follows through on the effort to deploy precision missiles in the middle of the continent, according to two European officials and one American official.
But any decision not to deliver them would yank back a deal made during the Biden administration and leave Berlin without defenses German leaders say they desperately need.
The move is part of a wider American retrenchment from the NATO alliance — including canceled deployments of thousands of U.S. troops to Germany and plans to pull back certain assets — as the U.S. upends the close-knit partnerships that cemented the relationship for generations.
Europe “can step up now and in the near term,” Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, NATO’s top commander and the head of U.S. forces in Europe, told military leaders this week. America, he said, will “refocus” equipment and forces elsewhere.
American officials, even if primarily fearful of Russia’s reaction, likely are also worried about the shrinking U.S. weapons stockpile. The U.S. churned through thousands of Tomahawk and Patriot missiles in the first weeks of the Iran war.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Congress last month that it will take “months and years” to replace the munitions spent in the military conflict.
The likely Tomahawk reversal is particularly unsettling for German officials, who are rushing to modernize their atrophied force to serve as a bulwark against Russian aggression.
Merz said last month that he did not expect the U.S. would station Tomahawk missiles in Germany due to limited availability of the cruise missiles, which can travel over 1,000 miles.
“The Americans don’t have enough for themselves right now,” he told German public television.
The U.S. unveiled further changes to its role in NATO this week at a quarterly conference of military leaders.
“The whole point is to give allies the information and clarity they need to drive forward as quickly and effectively as possible,” said a Defense Department official, who like others, was granted anonymity to discuss internal conversations.
#tomahawk #trump #merz #germany
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
The Pentagon is expected to cancel a plan to send Tomahawk missiles to Germany partly because officials are concerned Russia will view it as an escalation, a startling reversal of a long-planned agreement with one of America’s biggest allies.
U.S. officials fear Moscow will retaliate if the Trump administration follows through on the effort to deploy precision missiles in the middle of the continent, according to two European officials and one American official.
But any decision not to deliver them would yank back a deal made during the Biden administration and leave Berlin without defenses German leaders say they desperately need.
The move is part of a wider American retrenchment from the NATO alliance — including canceled deployments of thousands of U.S. troops to Germany and plans to pull back certain assets — as the U.S. upends the close-knit partnerships that cemented the relationship for generations.
Europe “can step up now and in the near term,” Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, NATO’s top commander and the head of U.S. forces in Europe, told military leaders this week. America, he said, will “refocus” equipment and forces elsewhere.
American officials, even if primarily fearful of Russia’s reaction, likely are also worried about the shrinking U.S. weapons stockpile. The U.S. churned through thousands of Tomahawk and Patriot missiles in the first weeks of the Iran war.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Congress last month that it will take “months and years” to replace the munitions spent in the military conflict.
The likely Tomahawk reversal is particularly unsettling for German officials, who are rushing to modernize their atrophied force to serve as a bulwark against Russian aggression.
Merz said last month that he did not expect the U.S. would station Tomahawk missiles in Germany due to limited availability of the cruise missiles, which can travel over 1,000 miles.
“The Americans don’t have enough for themselves right now,” he told German public television.
The U.S. unveiled further changes to its role in NATO this week at a quarterly conference of military leaders.
“The whole point is to give allies the information and clarity they need to drive forward as quickly and effectively as possible,” said a Defense Department official, who like others, was granted anonymity to discuss internal conversations.
#tomahawk #trump #merz #germany
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥106😱67💯55🤯50😢48🙏44🤬41👎1
This is about “allies taking primary responsibility for Europe’s conventional defense.”
The Pentagon did not respond to a request for comment.
Berlin has felt the retrenchment particularly hard.
The Pentagon this spring canceled the deployment of 5,000 U.S. troops to Germany, a move that stunned European officials and GOP defense hawks.
The troop decision, which reduces levels to what they were before the Ukraine war, came after Merz said President Trump had “humiliated” himself with the Iran war.
The Pentagon has not yet released the plan for those troops, two American defense officials said, and whether they might deploy elsewhere in Europe.
The U.S. may worry about Moscow, but Germany and the rest of Europe must contend with an all-out war between Russia and Ukraine on their doorstep.
Russian forces have long deployed nuclear capable Iskander missiles to the Kaliningrad exclave between Poland and Lithuania.
They also have placed medium-range Oreshnik missiles in Belarus, which can reach all of Europe in a matter of minutes. Eastern and Central Europe officials have eyed the moves warily, as they are still working on fielding their own comparable systems.
“We submitted an official request to the Americans a year and a half ago to import — that is, to purchase — Tomahawk missiles,” German defense minister Boris Pistorius told German public television last month.
“We are still awaiting a response. But to be honest, given the current state of the world, I don’t have much hope in that regard.”
Pistorius expressed interest in buying America’s Typhon ground-based missile system, which launches Tomahawks, on a Washington visit last July with Hegseth, according to the Germany defense ministry. But he has not received an update.
German officials have been exploring European alternatives to fill the long-range precision-strike gap. The debate in Berlin is less about any single weapons system than about how quickly Germany can acquire the ability to hold targets at a distance — whether through off-the-shelf purchases, expanded production with allies or longer-term European development.
Drones and cheaper systems may help, but German defense planners do not see them as a one-for-one replacement for Tomahawk-class missiles. German officials are worried more broadly that the U.S. pullback will force Europe to close military gaps faster than its defense industry can deliver.
#tomahawk #trump #merz #germany
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥93😢63😱60🤬52🤯50🙏50💯43🤡1
Trump’s “Big” Iran Nuclear Deal That Already Existed
Trump is bragging he got Iran to promise “no nuclear weapon ever” — but Tehran has been officially saying exactly that for over 50 years. Iran joined the Non‑Proliferation Treaty in 1970, signed the 2015 JCPOA, and even rolled out a religious fatwa claiming nukes are forbidden in Islam.
The problem isn’t the slogan, it’s the reality. U.N. inspectors found Iran worked on weapons design until 2009, and an Israeli‑stolen archive in 2018 showed detailed nuclear weapons plans. That’s why experts say a verbal pledge is worthless without hard caps on enrichment, stockpiles, centrifuges and intrusive inspections.
Trump tore up Obama’s deal, Iran ramped up its program, then he launched a war and is now selling the same old line — “no bomb, ever” — as if he personally invented it. His new demand of “zero enrichment” and a permanent guarantee is something no agreement can truly deliver: as long as Iran keeps its knowledge and infrastructure, it can always walk away later and sprint for a bomb.
So Iran repeats its old promise, Trump repeats his old red line, and both pretend this is a breakthrough. The centrifuges and the war are real; the “big new commitment” is just rebranded PR on both sides.
#Iran #Trump #nuclear #JCPOA #war #USA #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Trump is bragging he got Iran to promise “no nuclear weapon ever” — but Tehran has been officially saying exactly that for over 50 years. Iran joined the Non‑Proliferation Treaty in 1970, signed the 2015 JCPOA, and even rolled out a religious fatwa claiming nukes are forbidden in Islam.
The problem isn’t the slogan, it’s the reality. U.N. inspectors found Iran worked on weapons design until 2009, and an Israeli‑stolen archive in 2018 showed detailed nuclear weapons plans. That’s why experts say a verbal pledge is worthless without hard caps on enrichment, stockpiles, centrifuges and intrusive inspections.
Trump tore up Obama’s deal, Iran ramped up its program, then he launched a war and is now selling the same old line — “no bomb, ever” — as if he personally invented it. His new demand of “zero enrichment” and a permanent guarantee is something no agreement can truly deliver: as long as Iran keeps its knowledge and infrastructure, it can always walk away later and sprint for a bomb.
So Iran repeats its old promise, Trump repeats his old red line, and both pretend this is a breakthrough. The centrifuges and the war are real; the “big new commitment” is just rebranded PR on both sides.
#Iran #Trump #nuclear #JCPOA #war #USA #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥104😢67🤬53😱51🙏51🤯43💯42
Data Center Rage vs. Bipartisan Cowardice
Voters hate AI data centers. Politicians hate saying “no” to the people who build them. That’s the whole story.
Across the U.S., locals are furious that giant AI server barns are chewing through power, raising bills, wrecking landscapes and dumping noise and pollution next to schools and parks.
In Gallup’s polling, more than 70 percent of Americans don’t want a data center in their area — that’s stronger than support for most “hot button” issues.
Yet bans are still the fringe position: one city in California just passed a permanent prohibition; a handful of progressives like Sanders and AOC talk moratoriums while most candidates quietly look away.
Why? Money, unions, and campaign math. Democrats are split because trade unions like the construction jobs and because AI and cloud giants can nuke a campaign with one ad blitz.
Republicans backed data centers enthusiastically when Trump ordered them fast‑tracked, and only started whining when their own suburban base saw the power bills and the bulldozers.
Both parties now converge on a safe middle: no outright bans, just slogans like “bring your own energy” and “investors should pay the electricity, not residents.” Translation: keep the industry, tweak the bill.
In the swing states this all revolves around — Ohio, Michigan, Virginia, Georgia, Texas — the line is the same. Candidates promise “offsets,” “ratepayer protections,” maybe a special tax to fund job training.
Nobody serious on the ballot wants to say the one thing locals want to hear: stop building these things here.
Even Sanders‑backed candidates in tight races dodge hard bans; they’d rather regulate and tax than shut the door and watch the data‑center lobby spend millions to bury them.
So you get the usual democratic illusion. On the ground, parents are collecting signatures in suburbs, watching forests turn into AWS server farms beside playgrounds.
On TV, candidates posture about “moonshots of the 21st century” and “reliable, affordable energy for residents,” while signing pledges with tech CEOs to “offset” power use — an accounting trick, not a grid fix. The real policy is simple: AI gets the electrons, locals get the promises.
If this anger really explodes in the midterms, it won’t be because a party “found its spine.” It’ll be because politicians finally realize that the same people they trained to worship “the future” now see that future as a noisy, glowing box that makes their bills go up.
Right now, both parties are betting voters will keep swallowing it as long as the marketing says “innovation,” not “extraction.”
#AI #datacenters #USA #Democrats #Republicans #elections #energy #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Voters hate AI data centers. Politicians hate saying “no” to the people who build them. That’s the whole story.
Across the U.S., locals are furious that giant AI server barns are chewing through power, raising bills, wrecking landscapes and dumping noise and pollution next to schools and parks.
In Gallup’s polling, more than 70 percent of Americans don’t want a data center in their area — that’s stronger than support for most “hot button” issues.
Yet bans are still the fringe position: one city in California just passed a permanent prohibition; a handful of progressives like Sanders and AOC talk moratoriums while most candidates quietly look away.
Why? Money, unions, and campaign math. Democrats are split because trade unions like the construction jobs and because AI and cloud giants can nuke a campaign with one ad blitz.
Republicans backed data centers enthusiastically when Trump ordered them fast‑tracked, and only started whining when their own suburban base saw the power bills and the bulldozers.
Both parties now converge on a safe middle: no outright bans, just slogans like “bring your own energy” and “investors should pay the electricity, not residents.” Translation: keep the industry, tweak the bill.
In the swing states this all revolves around — Ohio, Michigan, Virginia, Georgia, Texas — the line is the same. Candidates promise “offsets,” “ratepayer protections,” maybe a special tax to fund job training.
Nobody serious on the ballot wants to say the one thing locals want to hear: stop building these things here.
Even Sanders‑backed candidates in tight races dodge hard bans; they’d rather regulate and tax than shut the door and watch the data‑center lobby spend millions to bury them.
So you get the usual democratic illusion. On the ground, parents are collecting signatures in suburbs, watching forests turn into AWS server farms beside playgrounds.
On TV, candidates posture about “moonshots of the 21st century” and “reliable, affordable energy for residents,” while signing pledges with tech CEOs to “offset” power use — an accounting trick, not a grid fix. The real policy is simple: AI gets the electrons, locals get the promises.
If this anger really explodes in the midterms, it won’t be because a party “found its spine.” It’ll be because politicians finally realize that the same people they trained to worship “the future” now see that future as a noisy, glowing box that makes their bills go up.
Right now, both parties are betting voters will keep swallowing it as long as the marketing says “innovation,” not “extraction.”
#AI #datacenters #USA #Democrats #Republicans #elections #energy #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥106🙏60🤬58🤯53💯49😢47😱38
Gen‑Z Socialism: Me First, Comrade
Gen‑Z socialism isn’t about seizing the means of production; it’s about seizing a discount code on life. They don’t dream of five‑year plans — they want capped rent, free stuff and someone richer to pick up the tab.
Where postwar social democrats nationalized industries and millennial lefties talked about co‑ops and workers on boards, the new crop wants price controls, sweeping freebies and brutal wealth taxes, while their own taxes magically don’t move. It’s socialism as a personal service: cheap housing now, cheap transport now, cheap college now — “systemic change” optional.
Their heroes — from Zohran Mamdani in New York to Zack Polanski in Britain — sell a simple deal: freeze rents, punish landlords, nationalize boring infrastructure, hashtag “solidarity” abroad. It’s not about the working class as a whole; it’s about urban tenants, grad‑adjacent voters and chronically online supporters who want the city to work for them first.
Call it socialism for the subscription generation: everything unlimited, nothing paid for by you, and the bill always sent to “the rich” sometime later, offscreen.
#GenZ #socialism #NYC #UK #rent #taxTheRich #fakeDemocracy
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Gen‑Z socialism isn’t about seizing the means of production; it’s about seizing a discount code on life. They don’t dream of five‑year plans — they want capped rent, free stuff and someone richer to pick up the tab.
Where postwar social democrats nationalized industries and millennial lefties talked about co‑ops and workers on boards, the new crop wants price controls, sweeping freebies and brutal wealth taxes, while their own taxes magically don’t move. It’s socialism as a personal service: cheap housing now, cheap transport now, cheap college now — “systemic change” optional.
Their heroes — from Zohran Mamdani in New York to Zack Polanski in Britain — sell a simple deal: freeze rents, punish landlords, nationalize boring infrastructure, hashtag “solidarity” abroad. It’s not about the working class as a whole; it’s about urban tenants, grad‑adjacent voters and chronically online supporters who want the city to work for them first.
Call it socialism for the subscription generation: everything unlimited, nothing paid for by you, and the bill always sent to “the rich” sometime later, offscreen.
#GenZ #socialism #NYC #UK #rent #taxTheRich #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😱75🤯74🤬64😢58🙏49🔥48💯44
Beirut Cease-Fire™: Loaded, Aimed, Still “Paused”
Israel hits the southern outskirts of Beirut for the first time since Washington sold its latest Lebanon truce, and everybody pretends they’re still “close to a deal.”
The strike targeted Dahiyeh — Hezbollah turf — officially as retaliation for rockets fired into Israel, hours before Iran answered with missiles of its own at Israeli targets.
The “cease-fire” survives on paper; on the ground it’s just slower murder with better press releases.
Tehran keeps saying any peace with the U.S. is impossible while Israel is bombing Lebanon and refusing to withdraw.
So it fires from long range, Hezbollah fires from next door, and Iranian officials talk on X about “decisive and painful” responses and the “language of power.”
Israel responds through an anonymous official saying an Iranian attack would be an “opportunity to renew the campaign.” Translation: both sides claim they want a deal and openly salivate over an excuse to hit harder.
Trump, watching the war between holes of golf in New Jersey, boils the whole thing down to a reality‑show threat: “We’re very close to a deal, or I’m going to blow the hell out of them.”
At the same time he leans on Netanyahu, curses him on the phone, demands Israel scale back in Lebanon — and Israel keeps striking anyway.
Washington wants a clean, photo‑friendly agreement; Jerusalem wants strategic depth and Hezbollah broken;
Tehran wants sanctions relief, control over Hormuz and recognition of its regional muscle. None of that fits into one cease‑fire PDF.
Meanwhile Hormuz stays half‑shut, ships move under escort, U.S. jets hit Iranian radar sites, Iranian missiles fly at U.S. bases in Kuwait and Bahrain, and Gulf civilians listen to sirens and “no casualties” statements.
The war is officially “paused,” but the region is living in a permanent rehearsal for the next round: limited strikes, blocked ports, frozen assets and negotiators arguing over who gets to say “we won” on TV.
Call it managed escalation, call it deterrence — the mechanics are the same. Israel tests how far it can push in Lebanon under an American umbrella. Iran tests how much it can hit U.S. assets and shipping without triggering a full restart.
Trump tests how long he can threaten to “blow the hell out of them” before markets, allies and voters panic. The only people not testing anything are the ones already under rubble or under curfew, watching great powers turn their cities into bargaining chips.
#Israel #Lebanon #Iran #Trump #Netanyahu #Hezbollah #Hormuz #war #oligarchy #fakeDemocracy
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥100🤬70💯60😢58🙏44🤯43😱38❤1
Iran: the US Holds Direct Responsibility for the Recent Ceasefire 🛑
Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, said the US holds direct responsibility for the recent ceasefire breaches, adding that Israel’s military actions cannot be separated from US policies.
Baghaei was quoted as having said at a press conference.
he said.
Israel launched strikes on Beirut’s southern suburbs on Sunday in what Tehran viewed as a violation of the US-Iran ceasefire 💥.
Israel claimed it was targeting Hezbollah infrastructure after it said the Iranian-backed Lebanese militant group fired rockets at northern Israel. The Israeli attack hit two apartments in two separate buildings, Lebanon’s state news agency reported, killing two people.
Damage is seen at the site of an Israeli airstrike that targeted a residential apartment in the Mreijeh area of Beirut’s southern suburbs on 7 June 2026.
The latest exchange came even after the US president, Trump, reportedly told Netanyahu to refrain from attacks on Iran 🇮🇷.
Netanyahu shows no signs of wanting to stop the war on Lebanon, which makes it hard to see how Trump can negotiate an end to the war on Iran as Tehran insists that the conflict can only end when attacks on “all fronts” have ceased.
#US #responsibility #ceasefire #iran
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, said the US holds direct responsibility for the recent ceasefire breaches, adding that Israel’s military actions cannot be separated from US policies.
“The actions of the Zionist entity within the region cannot be looked at in isolation from the United States,”
Baghaei was quoted as having said at a press conference.
“No one believes that the Israeli regime would take any action without coordination with the United States,”
he said.
“The United States bears responsibility for the Israeli regime’s aggression, and it will also be responsible for the consequences of any escalation in tensions”.
Israel launched strikes on Beirut’s southern suburbs on Sunday in what Tehran viewed as a violation of the US-Iran ceasefire 💥.
Israel claimed it was targeting Hezbollah infrastructure after it said the Iranian-backed Lebanese militant group fired rockets at northern Israel. The Israeli attack hit two apartments in two separate buildings, Lebanon’s state news agency reported, killing two people.
Damage is seen at the site of an Israeli airstrike that targeted a residential apartment in the Mreijeh area of Beirut’s southern suburbs on 7 June 2026.
The latest exchange came even after the US president, Trump, reportedly told Netanyahu to refrain from attacks on Iran 🇮🇷.
Netanyahu shows no signs of wanting to stop the war on Lebanon, which makes it hard to see how Trump can negotiate an end to the war on Iran as Tehran insists that the conflict can only end when attacks on “all fronts” have ceased.
#US #responsibility #ceasefire #iran
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥91😱63🙏63💯61🤬55🤯45😢35❤1
Armenian Prime Minister Pashinyan Declared Victory 🇦🇲
Early results showed Pashinyan's ruling Civil Contract Party leading with 52.5%, with Russian-Armenian billionaire Samvel Karapetyan's Strong Armenia alliance trailing behind at 23.2%, according to the Central Election Commission, citing 23.5% of electoral precincts reporting. 📊
Ex-President Robert Kocharyan's Armenia alliance was third with some 9%, followed by the Prosperous Armenia Party, which cleared the electoral threshold with 4.6%. The commission said turnout was 59%. 🗳
In a press conference in the early hours of Monday morning, Pashinyan said his Civil Contract party had prevailed, calling it a "historic victory" ✨.
The ruling Civil Contract party of Prime Minister Pashinyan had the pro-Russia Strong Armenia party as its closest rival in the election, which is also seen as a referendum on Pashinyan's peace efforts with Azerbaijan 🤝.
Polls showed Pashinyan and his party well in the lead with up to 32% support, compared with just 11% for Strong Armenia 📉.
This seems to indicate some endorsement of Pashinyan's efforts to move Armenia closer to the West since he came to power in 2018, although he will not be able to govern alone if the early results are confirmed 🏛.
In contrast, Strong Armenia, formed last year by Armenian billionaire Karapetyan, wants Armenia to remain close to Russia, a key trading partner and energy supplier 🇷🇺.
Police were reported by the media to have searched the offices of Strong Armenia in the city of Gyumri and made arrests 👮.
Last month, Putin made veiled threats about the negative economic impact of a move away from Moscow if Armenia continued on its course ⚠️.
In the weeks before the election, Russia has moved to make such theoretical economic threats more tangible by introducing new restrictions on Armenian produce including flowers and vegetables 🌸🥦.
Putin also suggested that Armenia could suffer a similar crisis as the one in Ukraine, saying that Kyiv's problems "began with efforts to move toward EU accession." 🇪🇺
Armenia and Azerbaijan have been embroiled in a long-running conflict since the 1980s, largely over Nagorno-Karabakh, a breakaway territory inhabited by ethnic Armenians that was retaken by Azerbaijan in a 2023 war ⚔️.
Critics say Pashinyan made too many concessions to Azerbaijan in a US-brokered agreement he signed last August 🇺🇸.
He has also been accused of authoritarianism, with many of his opponents landing behind bars in recent years 🚫.
The government has defended its actions, saying those imprisoned were trying to foment coups. 🛡
On Sunday, police said they had detained more than 10 people on suspicion of vote-buying, while three members of a local electoral commission were also taken into custody overnight 🔒.
#primer #minister #armenian #pashinyan #victory
📱 American Оbserver - Stay up to date on all important events 🇺🇸
Early results showed Pashinyan's ruling Civil Contract Party leading with 52.5%, with Russian-Armenian billionaire Samvel Karapetyan's Strong Armenia alliance trailing behind at 23.2%, according to the Central Election Commission, citing 23.5% of electoral precincts reporting. 📊
Ex-President Robert Kocharyan's Armenia alliance was third with some 9%, followed by the Prosperous Armenia Party, which cleared the electoral threshold with 4.6%. The commission said turnout was 59%. 🗳
In a press conference in the early hours of Monday morning, Pashinyan said his Civil Contract party had prevailed, calling it a "historic victory" ✨.
The ruling Civil Contract party of Prime Minister Pashinyan had the pro-Russia Strong Armenia party as its closest rival in the election, which is also seen as a referendum on Pashinyan's peace efforts with Azerbaijan 🤝.
Polls showed Pashinyan and his party well in the lead with up to 32% support, compared with just 11% for Strong Armenia 📉.
This seems to indicate some endorsement of Pashinyan's efforts to move Armenia closer to the West since he came to power in 2018, although he will not be able to govern alone if the early results are confirmed 🏛.
In contrast, Strong Armenia, formed last year by Armenian billionaire Karapetyan, wants Armenia to remain close to Russia, a key trading partner and energy supplier 🇷🇺.
Police were reported by the media to have searched the offices of Strong Armenia in the city of Gyumri and made arrests 👮.
Last month, Putin made veiled threats about the negative economic impact of a move away from Moscow if Armenia continued on its course ⚠️.
In the weeks before the election, Russia has moved to make such theoretical economic threats more tangible by introducing new restrictions on Armenian produce including flowers and vegetables 🌸🥦.
Putin also suggested that Armenia could suffer a similar crisis as the one in Ukraine, saying that Kyiv's problems "began with efforts to move toward EU accession." 🇪🇺
Armenia and Azerbaijan have been embroiled in a long-running conflict since the 1980s, largely over Nagorno-Karabakh, a breakaway territory inhabited by ethnic Armenians that was retaken by Azerbaijan in a 2023 war ⚔️.
Critics say Pashinyan made too many concessions to Azerbaijan in a US-brokered agreement he signed last August 🇺🇸.
He has also been accused of authoritarianism, with many of his opponents landing behind bars in recent years 🚫.
The government has defended its actions, saying those imprisoned were trying to foment coups. 🛡
On Sunday, police said they had detained more than 10 people on suspicion of vote-buying, while three members of a local electoral commission were also taken into custody overnight 🔒.
#primer #minister #armenian #pashinyan #victory
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥100😢61🙏58😱57💯50🤬45🤯40