🌿 Misloun Kaj: From Venezuela to Islam

“My father was happy. He had always wished to have a daughter who wore the hijab.”

🔹 My transformation did not happen overnight; it was a gradual process. It began with developing a deeper understanding of Islam and a stronger sense of belonging to it.

🇻🇪 Misloun Kaj was born in Caracas, Venezuela, into a Lebanese-descended family. As a child, she attended a Catholic school and knew very little about religion. Her family was not particularly religious, and she struggled with many questions about Islam.

❓ Why do women have to wear hijab while men don't?
❓ Why do women stand behind men during prayer?
❓ Why can my brothers do things that I cannot?

These questions remained with her for years.

📚 Her journey toward Islam was gradual.
At university, she became increasingly interested in Islam and began researching the experiences of converts. She visited both Shia and Sunni mosques and encountered a Latin American cleric whose approach to Islam deeply impressed her.

“He didn't simply say, ‘You must pray five times a day or you will go to hell.’ Instead, he spoke about spirituality, the meaning of religion in our lives, and what religion adds to our lives.”

🌍 Her interest in Lebanon also grew, particularly during the 2006 Lebanon War. Seeing the media coverage and the response of Lebanese and Venezuelan communities led her to become politically and socially active.

❤️ She later traveled to Lebanon and spent six months there, wanting to understand the country, its people, and the roots of their dignity, resilience, and attachment to the Prophet's family.

She was particularly touched by:

✨ The strength of family relationships
✨ Love for the Ahl al-Bayt
✨ Devotion to Lady Fatima (sa) and Lady Zaynab (sa)
✨ The spirit of resistance and solidarity

🧕 Her religious transformation also changed her relationship with her family.

Her mother was unhappy with the changes and questioned why she prayed so much and had become so serious about religious practices.

But her father was different:

“My father was happy. He had always wished to have a daughter who wore the hijab. He was only somewhat unhappy that I had learned about Islam through the Shia community.”

💭 In the end, Misloun also came to rethink the relationship between religion and politics:

“I used to think that in Venezuela, religion should not become involved in politics. But later I realized that being religious does not necessarily mean that non-Muslims cannot participate, and that a political project does not have to be defined as something exclusively for Muslims.”

🌱 Her story is not one of a single moment of conversion, but of questions, research, experience, and a gradual journey toward faith.

📖 Read the full interview:
http://rahyafteha.ir/33388/

#Islam #ConvertToIslam #MislounKaj #Hijab #Lebanon #Venezuela #AhlulBayt #ShiaIslam #IslamicJourney

🆔 @rahyafte_en

The Day God Was Pleased—and the Day the Prophet Was Martyred

🔷 The Day God Was Pleased—and the Day the Prophet Was Martyred

The verses of Tabligh (5:67) and Ikmal (5:3) illuminate the central place of the wilayah of Imam Ali (peace be upon him) within the structure of Islam.

The mission of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ did not reach its completion merely by conveying a collection of laws and teachings. The proclamation of wilayah was the link that completed this divine mission.

The Qur’an declares:

“O Messenger! Convey what has been revealed to you from your Lord…”

(Qur’an 5:67)

And following the event of Ghadir, Allah declares:

“Today I have perfected your religion for you, completed My favor upon you, and chosen Islam as your religion.”

(Qur’an 5:3)

Ghadir, therefore, was not merely a political or historical event. It was the moment when the structure of divine religion was completed through wilayah, ensuring that the path of guidance would continue after the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.

Even during the final days of his life, amid illness and suffering, the Prophet ﷺ continued to strive to preserve this path and establish the wilayah of Imam Ali (peace be upon him).

From this perspective, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ can be regarded as the first martyr of the path of wilayah—the Prophet who carried his mission to his final breath in defense of the true path of Islam.

His final days reveal not only the depth of his suffering, but also the magnitude of his concern for the future of the Ummah. His message was not merely about establishing a religion; it was about ensuring that divine guidance would not be abandoned after his departure.

The loneliness of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, his suffering, and the events surrounding his final illness remain among the most painful chapters in the history of Islam.

The Prophet completed his mission.
Ghadir completed the religion.
And the Messenger of Allah ﷺ became the first martyr on the path of wilayah.

May Allah grant us the understanding and loyalty to the path of Muhammad ﷺ and the Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them).

#Ghadir #Wilayah #ImamAli #AliIbnAbiTalib #AyatAlTabligh #AyatAlIkmal #Imamate #ProphetMuhammad #AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #Shiism #GhadirKhum #MessengerOfAllah #MartyrdomOfTheProphet #Seerah #MuhammadKhaneifarzadeh #SahebMedia

🔗 Saheb Media:
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2699

🆔 @rahyafte_en

What Is the Greatest “Good” in the Sight of God?

🔷 What does Allah Himself call the greatest “good”?

The Qur’an gives us a profound answer:

“What remains with Allah is better for you, if you are believers.”

(Qur’an 11:86)

There are countless forms of goodness in our lives. Caring for orphans is good. Praying on time is good. Helping the poor, building schools, serving others, and easing people’s difficulties are all noble deeds.

No one is saying otherwise.

But if Allah Himself tells us what is “better for you”, then we should pay attention to what He is pointing toward.

“بَقِيَّةُ اللَّهِ خَيْرٌ لَّكُمْ إِن كُنتُم مُّؤْمِنِينَ”

In the teachings of Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them), Baqiyyatullah is associated with the divine proof and, in particular, Imam al-Mahdi (peace be upon him).

This does not diminish the value of other good deeds. Rather, it gives them direction.

You may feed an orphan and earn immense reward.
You may pray at the proper time and draw closer to Allah.
You may help the needy and serve humanity.

All of these are paths toward goodness.

But knowing the Imam, remaining loyal to the wilayah of Ahl al-Bayt, and helping preserve the faith of people in the age of occultation gives these efforts a greater direction and purpose.

This is why serving Imam al-Mahdi (peace be upon him) is not merely an emotional expression of love.

It can mean guiding people toward faith, preserving the teachings of Ahl al-Bayt, defending truth, protecting people from losing their connection with religion, and helping those who are being swept away by the currents of our time.

The true believer is not someone who merely waits for the Imam.

The true believer prepares people for him.

When people are being pulled away from faith, someone must reach out and bring them back. When ignorance spreads, someone must preserve knowledge. When hope disappears, someone must keep the light of wilayah alive.

That, too, is a form of serving the Imam of our time.

So let us not ask only:

“What good deed can I do?”

Let us also ask:

“Which good deed brings me closer to Allah, strengthens wilayah, and helps others remain on the path of divine guidance?”

For the believer, Baqiyyatullah is not merely a name to be spoken.

He is a direction toward which the heart, faith, and deeds must move.

اللهم عجل لوليك الفرج 🤲

#Baqiyyatullah #ImamMahdi #AlMahdi #Wilayah #AhlulBayt #Mawaddah #Madhhab #IslamicTeachings #Mahdism #AwaitingTheMahdi #Intizar #ShiaIslam #AhlAlBayt #IslamicKnowledge #SahebMedia #MuhammadKhaneifarzadeh

🔗 Saheb Media:
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2702

🆔 @rahyafte_en

🔷 A Strange Admission by Abu Bakr

One of the well-known principles of Islamic jurisprudence is:

“The admission of a sane person against himself is legally binding.”

(Al-iqrar ‘ala al-nafs)

In other words, when a mentally competent person acknowledges something against his own interests, that admission carries significant legal weight.

This principle raises an important historical question concerning Abu Bakr, the first caliph.

According to reports attributed to Abd al-Rahman ibn Awf, Abu Bakr, during the final hours of his life, expressed deep regret over three matters. Among the statements attributed to him is:

“I wish I had not opened Fatimah’s house, even if it had been closed for confrontation, and I wish I had not sent men into it by force.”

If this report is accepted as authentic, its implications are profound.

It would mean that, at the end of his life, Abu Bakr himself expressed regret over actions involving the house of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (peace be upon her)—the daughter of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ and a member of the Ahl al-Bayt.

The issue becomes even more serious when considered alongside reports concerning the use of fire as a means of punishment. The Prophetic tradition contains explicit prohibitions against punishing people by fire, reserving punishment by fire for Allah.

Therefore, the historical question remains:

If the report of Abu Bakr’s final admission is authentic, what does his own regret tell us about what happened to the household of Fatimah al-Zahra (peace be upon her)?

For those who study the history of the early Islamic period, this is not merely a question of politics.

It is a question of testimony, responsibility, and the sanctity of the household of the Prophet ﷺ.

May Allah grant us the courage to examine history with honesty, justice, and without fear.

#HistoricalAdmission #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #HouseOfFatimah #IslamicHistory #AbuBakr #Wilayah #ShiaIslam #ProphetMuhammad #AhlAlBayt #IslamicJurisprudence #HistoryOfIslam #SahebMedia #MuhammadKhaneifarzadeh

🔗 Saheb Media:
https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2720

🆔 @rahyafte_en

And once we begin asking that question, understanding the history of Fāṭimah al-Zahrāʾ (سلام الله عليها) becomes impossible without confronting these uncomfortable reports.

May Allah grant us the courage to seek the truth, even when the truth is difficult.

#History #FatimahAlZahra #Fatima #AhlulBayt #HouseOfFatimah #EarlyIslamicHistory #UmarIbnAlKhattab #UrwahIbnAlZubayr #AlMasudi #AlWaqidi #IbnAbiShaybah #UnderstandingHistory #AhlulBaytHistory

https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2721

🆔 @rahyafte_en

The first historical questions should be more precise:

Was there a confrontation at Fāṭimah's house?

Were there threats involving fire?

Was pressure applied to obtain allegiance?

Which early sources preserve these reports?

How independent are the traditions?

What details are historically secure, and which remain disputed?

How did later political and theological developments affect the transmission of these reports?

This is what understanding history means.

Not accepting everything.

Not denying everything.

But following the evidence wherever it leads.

And when the evidence concerns Fāṭimah al-Zahrāʾ (سلام الله عليها), the daughter of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, the subject deserves particular care, precision, and intellectual honesty.

The name of Fāṭimah remains one of the clearest moral dividing lines in the history of Islam.

History may be censored.
Sources may be selective.
Narratives may be rewritten.
But the task of the historian remains the same: search, compare, verify—and never surrender the truth to inherited slogans.

#History #IslamicHistory #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #EarlyIslam #HouseOfFatimah #HistoricalResearch #SourceCriticism #UmarIbnAlKhattab #UrwahIbnAlZubayr #MusaIbnUqbah #AlWaqidi #AhlulBaytHistory #UnderstandingHistory

https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2722

🆔 @rahyafte_en

🔷 What Did Ibn Taymiyyah Say About Abu Bakr?

A Historical Admission—or a Defensive Justification?

Sometimes, when investigating a historical event, the most revealing evidence does not come from its opponents, but from the way its defenders attempt to explain it.

One noteworthy example is a passage found in Ibn Taymiyyah’s famous work Minhāj al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah, volume 8, page 291, in his discussion of the reports concerning the house of Fāṭimah al-Zahrāʾ (سلام الله عليها).

Ibn Taymiyyah writes:

“The most that can be said is that he entered the house to see whether there was any of the public treasury’s property there…”

This passage deserves careful attention.

🔸 Ibn Taymiyyah himself preserves the claim that Abū Bakr entered Fāṭimah’s house in order to investigate whether public property was present there.

🔸 He uses the expression “kabas al-bayt” (كبس البيت)—a term that does not ordinarily describe a casual visit, but rather conveys the idea of entering upon a place with force or pressure.

🔸 However, it would be historically inaccurate to claim that Ibn Taymiyyah thereby accepted the entire Shīʿī account of the attack. He presents the statement within an argument and then attempts to justify Abū Bakr’s alleged action. Therefore, the passage should be understood in its full context.

So the more precise historical question is not simply:

❌ “Did Ibn Taymiyyah openly accept the Shīʿī version of the attack?”

Rather, we should ask:

Why does Ibn Taymiyyah, while defending Abū Bakr, even discuss a scenario in which Abū Bakr entered Fāṭimah’s house to investigate property?

And more importantly:

What source was Ibn Taymiyyah relying upon when presenting this claim?

This is precisely where historical research must move beyond slogans and enter the realm of source criticism and contextual analysis.

🔸 An Important Point

In the same discussion, Ibn Taymiyyah attempts to argue that Abū Bakr did not harm ʿAlī, al-Zubayr, or the other opponents of his rule, while presenting the alleged entry into the house as an act motivated by concern over “the property of Allah” and its distribution.

Therefore, even someone who rejects the Shīʿī interpretation of these events cannot simply claim:

“There is absolutely no historical report about Abū Bakr entering Fāṭimah’s house.”

Such a statement would be difficult to reconcile with the passage preserved in Minhāj al-Sunnah.

At the same time, intellectual honesty requires another distinction:

This passage by itself does not establish every detail found in Shīʿī accounts—such as the breaking of the door, physical assault, or the martyrdom of al-Muḥassin.

Each of those claims requires its own independent examination of the sources.

But the passage is still historically significant enough to raise an important question:

If there was no historical basis whatsoever for such an incident, why would one of Abū Bakr’s strongest defenders discuss his entering Fāṭimah’s house in the first place?

🔻 This Is How We Should Read History

Do not accept every claim without examination.

But do not reject every uncomfortable report simply because it challenges a familiar narrative.

Read the text.
Examine the wording.
Study the context.
Identify the source.
Then draw the conclusion.

The house of Fāṭimah al-Zahrāʾ (سلام الله عليها) is not merely a historical detail.

It is one of the most important points of dispute in understanding the events that followed the death of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.

And if we truly want to understand history, we must be willing to examine both the evidence and the arguments of those who oppose our interpretation.

📚 Minhāj al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah, Ibn Taymiyyah, vol. 8, p. 291.

#IbnTaymiyyah #MinhajAlSunnah #AbuBakr #FatimahAlZahra #HouseOfFatimah #AttackOnFatimahsHouse #AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #HistoricalResearch #SourceCriticism #EarlyIslamicHistory #AhlulBaytHistory #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia

https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2723

🆔 @rahyafte_en

And that alone makes this one of the most important reports to investigate when studying the events surrounding the succession after the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.

The truth does not become false because it is uncomfortable.
And historical research does not become sectarian simply because it asks difficult questions.

📚 Tārīkh al-Ṭabarī; al-ʿIqd al-Farīd; Tārīkh Madīnat Dimashq.

#AbuBakr #FatimahAlZahra #HouseOfFatimah #Saqifah #EarlyIslamicHistory #IslamicHistory #AhlulBayt #HistoricalResearch #HistoryOfIslam #UmarIbnAlKhattab #UthmanIbnAffan #HistoricalSources #AhlulBaytHistory #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia

https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2724

🆔 @rahyafte_en

It should be answered by returning to the earliest sources, reading them carefully, and allowing the historical evidence to speak.

The standard applied to the Prophet ﷺ must not become weaker than the standard applied to those who came after him.

#RazziyyatAlKhamis #CalamityOfThursday #ProphetMuhammad #AbuBakr #UmarIbnAlKhattab #FinalTestament #SahihBukhari #SahihMuslim #Saqifah #IslamicHistory #EarlyIslamicHistory #AhlulBayt #HistoricalResearch #HistoryOfIslam #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia

https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2725

🆔 @rahyafte_en

A later version is not automatically more reliable merely because it is easier to read or more favorable to a particular narrative.

🔸 The Historian's Responsibility

When we encounter conflicting versions, the correct response is not:

“This proves a conspiracy.”

Nor is it:

“There is nothing to investigate.”

The correct response is:

Find the earliest available version.
Compare every surviving transmission.
Identify what was added.
Identify what disappeared.
Examine the chains of transmission.
Check manuscript and edition differences.
Then determine which reading has the strongest historical basis.

This is the essence of historical source criticism.

And it becomes especially important when the subject concerns the political legitimacy of the earliest Islamic governments.

Because when an event has implications for legitimacy, succession, and the relationship between the ruling authorities and the household of the Prophet ﷺ, the possibility of selective transmission must be taken seriously—but also demonstrated, not merely asserted.

🔻 One Final Point

If a report appears in an early source, and a later source preserves the same report but removes its most sensitive sentence, the disappearance itself becomes a historical question.

The historian should ask:

What did the earliest form say?

When did the wording change?

Who transmitted the altered version?

And what historical context might explain the change?

That is how we move beyond inherited narratives.

History is not understood by repeating the latest version.
It is understood by tracing the history of the text itself.

#HistoricalCensorship #SourceCriticism #AbuBakr #FatimahAlZahra #HouseOfFatimah #IslamicHistory #EarlyIslamicHistory #AhlulBayt #HistoricalSources #HistoryOfIslam #Saqifah #Kallalah #ManuscriptStudies #TextualCriticism #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia

https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2726

🆔 @rahyafte_en

🔻 History Must Be Judged by Its Own Standards

This is why the discussion surrounding the house of Fāṭimah cannot be reduced to a simple argument over political allegiance.

The deeper question is:

Did the actions attributed to the actors of that period conform to the moral and religious standards taught by the Prophet ﷺ?

If the answer is no, then the historian must explain the contradiction.

And if someone rejects the reports concerning physical violence or the loss of al-Muḥassin, then the correct approach is not merely to dismiss them.

Examine the sources.
Examine the chains.
Compare the versions.
Determine what is early and what is late.
Separate established facts from disputed details.

That is how history should be studied.

Not through blind loyalty.

Not through blind hatred.

But through evidence, context, and moral consistency.

🔻 One Final Question

The Prophet ﷺ spent his life teaching mercy toward the weak.

He prohibited the killing of women and children.

He condemned the killing of infants.

He taught his followers to respect human dignity.

So when we study what happened immediately after his death, we should ask one simple question:

If the reports of violence against Fāṭimah's household are true, how can those actions be reconciled with the moral legacy of the Prophet ﷺ?

That question deserves an honest historical investigation.

Because Saqīfah was not merely about who would govern.

It was also about what happened to the Prophet's family when political power was being established.

And the house of Fāṭimah remains one of the most painful and consequential questions in the history of early Islam.

#Saqifah #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #HouseOfFatimah #AlMuhassin #EarlyIslamicHistory #IslamicHistory #ProphetMuhammad #HistoryOfIslam #HistoricalResearch #SourceCriticism #AhlulBaytHistory #Justice #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia

https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2727

🆔 @rahyafte_en

🔷 Does Imam al-Mahdi (may Allah hasten his reappearance) Truly Matter to Us?

🔸 We all make plans for work, income, family, education, and dozens of daily responsibilities.

But if we were to put our entire 24-hour schedule down on paper, one serious question would arise:

How much of our daily schedule is actually dedicated to Imam al-Mahdi (aj)? 🤔

🧠 Imagine that, with today’s scientific tools, detailed images of our brain were taken—showing different sections and the activities taking place within them.

Now ask yourself:

If there were to be a specific part of our thoughts and priorities dedicated to our most important responsibility, would there actually be a place in our mind and our life for serving Imam al-Mahdi (aj)?

🔹 A true believer who awaits the Imam should have reached this conviction deep within their heart and mind:

“My duty is to serve my Imam.”

This means that Imam al-Mahdi should not merely be a name mentioned in our prayers;
rather, he should be at the center of our lives and guide our choices.

🔸 Of course, this does not mean abandoning our work and responsibilities.

We must work,
💰 earn lawful income,
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 care for our families,
💼 have a profession and a respected place in society,
📚 study and learn,
and strive for a better life.

These things, too, can become part of our worship of Allah and our obedience to the teachings of Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them).

But here is the real question:

Are these things the ultimate purpose of our lives—or are they means through which we fulfill our greater responsibility?

🎯 If the essential duty of a true follower is to serve Imam al-Mahdi, then there must be a real place for this duty in our daily schedule.

Even if we say:

“My Imam, I truly cannot give more time than this—but I will dedicate one hour every day to you.”

One hour to know our Imam,
one hour to learn about the teachings of Mahdism,
one hour to understand and answer doubts and misconceptions,
one hour to properly introduce the culture of awaiting the reappearance,
one hour to do something that brings about the Imam’s satisfaction...

⏳ If we consciously dedicated just one hour of every day to our Imam, would our lives still be the same?

Perhaps our situation would not be what it is today... if the Imam truly had a place in our daily lives.

🌱 True awaiting is not merely something we say with our tongues; it is something we make time for.

#ImamAlMahdi #AwaitingTheReappearance #TrueAwaiting #Mahdism #Reappearance #AhlulBayt #IslamicTeachings

🔗 https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2728

🆔 @rahyafte_en

🔷 What Does “Thirty Years of Hadith Prohibition” Mean?
[An Image of a Catastrophe in Islam]

🔸 How severe was the censorship?

Consider a government whose legitimacy was built upon a particular historical event. If the truth of that event were exposed, the very basis of its legitimacy would be called into question.

So how could such a government allow that event to be accurately transmitted to future generations?

The answer was censorship.

For approximately thirty years after the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, the transmission and recording of his sayings and traditions were subjected to severe restrictions.

Think about what that means.

🌱 Imagine a gardener planting a seed.
He waters it, nourishes it, protects it, and patiently helps it grow until the plant can stand on its own.

Now imagine that instead of nurturing it, someone steps on it and crushes it.

What happens to its growth?

It becomes distorted.
Its development is disrupted.
It no longer grows naturally.

This is how a religious tradition can be damaged when its connection to the words and teachings of its Prophet is deliberately suppressed.

🔹 For thirty years, “The Messenger of Allah said…” was not something that could simply be transmitted freely.

And then we are told:

📖 “We have the Book of Allah; that is sufficient for us.”

But does the Qur’an itself not assign the Prophet ﷺ the responsibility of explaining and clarifying revelation?

The Qur’an speaks of the Prophet teaching people the Book and wisdom.

So what happens when the Prophet’s explanations and teachings are pushed aside?

A gap is created—and someone will eventually fill it.

⚠️ And this is where another danger emerges: the infiltration of foreign narratives and Israeliyyat into Islamic interpretation.

Figures such as Ka'b al-Ahbar gained influence in the field of religious interpretation. Narratives attributed to earlier traditions began entering the process of explaining the Qur’an.

A person could simply enter the Muslim community, declare:

“I bear witness that there is no god but Allah, and I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.”

And then, remarkably, the next day, begin publicly interpreting the Qur’an.

📌 Whoever controls religious interpretation can profoundly influence how a generation understands its religion.

And remember:

When authentic Prophetic teachings are suppressed, the vacuum does not remain empty.

Someone else steps in.

Someone else speaks.

Someone else interprets.

Someone else becomes the “source” through which people understand their faith.

🔻 This is why understanding the history of hadith censorship is not a minor historical detail.

It is a key to understanding:

How was the memory of the Prophet preserved?
Who was allowed to transmit his words?
Who was allowed to interpret the Qur’an?
And how did foreign narratives enter Islamic thought?

The Qur’an says that the Prophet ﷺ was sent to teach and explain.

So if for decades people are prevented from saying:

“The Messenger of Allah said…”

we should seriously ask:

❓ What happens to a religion when its divinely appointed teacher is silenced?

🔷 Thirty years is not a small period of time.

Thirty years is enough to shape a generation.

And sometimes, to understand the tragedies that came later,
we must first understand what was prevented from being remembered.

#HadithProhibition #Hadith #SuppressionOfHadith #Saqifah #KaabAlAhbar #IslamicHistory #AhlulBayt #PropheticTradition #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia

🔗 https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2729

🆔 @rahyafte_en

🔷 Examples of Historical Fabrication in the Present Day

🔸 The pain of history does not end with the events of Saqifah.

From the Umayyad and Abbasid caliphates to certain modern movements and media, efforts have continued in different forms to conceal, soften, or reinterpret the painful events of early Islamic history—particularly the reported attack on the house of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) and the loss of her unborn child.

📚 Even today, historical narratives can be presented in ways that leave out essential details.

For example, in some educational materials, the children of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ are presented merely as children who died at a young age, without adequately addressing the broader historical disputes surrounding the Prophet’s family.

🎬 And in modern television productions, historical figures such as Mu'awiyah may sometimes be portrayed through narratives that significantly differ from the accounts found in classical Islamic sources.

🔻 But why does this matter?

Because controlling the narrative of history can shape how generations understand justice, oppression, and the legacy of the Prophet ﷺ.

History tells us that during the Umayyad period, commanders such as Busr ibn Abi Artat, acting on Mu'awiyah’s orders according to historical reports, carried out brutal campaigns that included the killing of civilians and children.

These are not merely stories from a distant past.

They raise a fundamental question:

❓ What happens when the painful parts of history are systematically forgotten, softened, or removed?

When the suffering of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) is concealed,
when the events surrounding her home are dismissed or ignored,
when the historical persecution of the Ahlul Bayt (as) is minimized,

then an important part of the history of Islam disappears from public memory.

🌹 Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) was not an ordinary woman.

She was the beloved daughter of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ,
the mother of Imam al-Hasan and Imam al-Husayn (peace be upon them),
and a central figure in the household of revelation.

Yet even today, the location of her grave remains unknown.

🔹 According to traditions within Shi'a Islam, even in the era of the reappearance, the exact location of her grave will remain undisclosed.

Think about the meaning of that.

A woman who was the daughter of the Prophet ﷺ,
the mother of the leaders of the youth of Paradise,
and revered as al-Siddiqah al-Kubra—

her final resting place remains hidden.

💔 Why?

Perhaps the hidden grave itself has become a permanent historical testimony.

A silent question addressed to every generation:

How could the daughter of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ suffer such oppression, while those who came after her claimed to represent his religion?

🔷 The question is not merely what happened in the past.

The deeper question is:

What are we doing with the truth today?

Are we willing to study history honestly—even when it challenges the narratives we inherited?

Are we willing to distinguish between historical evidence and historical propaganda?

And most importantly:

🌱 Will we allow the suffering of the Ahlul Bayt (as) to become merely a forgotten chapter of history—or will we learn from it?

#HistoricalCensorship #LadyFatimah #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #Umayyads #Muawiyah #Saqifah #HistoricalTruth #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia

🔗 https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2730

🆔 @rahyafte_en

🔷 Two Balls in Football and a Rooster Laying Eggs!
[Don’t Even Mention the Evidence of the Burning of the House of Revelation…]

🔸 Explaining historical facts to someone who has replaced thinking with blind partisanship is like arguing with a person who watches a football match for fifteen minutes and then insists:

“Why doesn’t each team have its own ball?” ⚽⚽

You explain the rules.
You explain the game.
You give him one reason after another.

But he keeps inventing new arguments to defend an idea that makes absolutely no sense.

Now imagine trying to discuss one of the most painful controversies in early Islamic history: the reported attack and burning of the house of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa).

You present evidence.
📚 You cite historical sources.
📖 You bring reports from Sunni sources themselves.
🔎 You present chains of transmission and historical accounts.

And yet, some people will still reject everything—not because there is no evidence, but because they have already decided that they do not want to accept the conclusion.

It becomes an endless cycle:

You provide one source →
they demand another.

You provide ten →
they question all ten.

You provide dozens →
they simply move the goalposts again.

At some point, you have to ask:

Are we actually discussing evidence—or are we simply refusing to think?

⚠️ There is an old saying:

“You can give a thousand arguments that a rooster cannot lay eggs, but someone determined to believe otherwise will keep asking for another proof.” 🐓🥚

The problem is not always a lack of evidence.

Sometimes the problem is the refusal to accept evidence.

🔻 Over the centuries, countless books were lost, destroyed, or suppressed. Scholars and historical figures were attacked, marginalized, or discredited simply because they transmitted accounts that challenged powerful narratives.

And yet, despite all of this:

☀️ Truth does not disappear simply because someone refuses to look at it.

The question surrounding the house of Lady Fatimah al-Zahra (sa) is therefore not something that can be dismissed with a simple:

“There is no evidence.”

The serious question is:

📌 Have you actually examined the historical evidence?

Have you looked at the sources?
Have you examined what was transmitted in the earliest records?
Have you compared different accounts?
Have you considered what even prominent historical figures and sources attributed to the events?

Because when evidence is repeatedly presented from sources that you yourself consider authoritative, simply rejecting everything because it conflicts with an inherited narrative is not scholarship.

It is partisanship.

🔷 History deserves investigation—not blind loyalty.

And when it comes to the suffering and oppression of Ahlul Bayt (peace be upon them), we should have the courage to ask uncomfortable questions, examine the evidence, and follow the truth wherever it leads.

Because…

⚽ A football match needs one ball.
🐓 A rooster does not lay eggs.
📚 And historical claims require evidence—not endless excuses.

☀️ Truth may be hidden behind clouds for a time, but it does not cease to be the sun.

#HistoricalTruth #HistoricalCensorship #HouseOfFatimah #FatimahAlZahra #AhlulBayt #IslamicHistory #Saqifah #HistoricalEvidence #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia

🔗 https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2731

🆔 @rahyafte_en

#HistoricalTestimony #SelfCensorship #IbnAbiDarim #AlDhahabi #FatimahAlZahra #Muhsin #AhlulBayt #Hadith #IslamicHistory #HistoricalCensorship #MuhammadKhoniferzadeh #SahebMedia

🔗 https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2732

🆔 @rahyafte_en

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

🔷 So before declaring a historical narrative “settled,” ask one question:

WHO DECIDED WHAT WE WERE ALLOWED TO READ?

#Sīrah
#IbnIshaq
#IbnHisham
#IslamicHistory
#HistoricalCriticism
#HadithStudies
#HistoryOfIslam
#AhlulBayt
#FāṭimahAlZahrā
#PropheticBiography

https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2740

🆔 @rahyafte_en

Some reports connect the Ridda conflicts not simply with rejection of Islam, but with refusal to accept the political authority established after the Prophet’s death, refusal to pay certain obligations, or disputes over allegiance.

Therefore, historians must ask:

❓ Who was actually considered a “rebel”?

❓ Who was called an “apostate”?

❓ Was every such designation purely theological — or could political considerations also have played a role?

These are not questions to be answered by slogans.

They require source criticism.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

🟢 The real lesson is methodological.

When early books disappear, we should not automatically conclude:

❌ “The event never happened.”

But neither should we conclude:

❌ “Every surviving quotation must be authentic.”
Instead:

✅ Examine the earliest surviving references.
✅ Trace quotations back to their alleged sources.
✅ Compare Sunni and Shiʿi transmissions.
✅ Study the isnāds.
✅ Examine the political context.
✅ Distinguish lost sources from fabricated reports.
✅ Ask why certain narratives survived while others disappeared.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

🔷 History is not only about the books we possess.

It is also about the books we lost.

And sometimes, the most important historical question is not:

“Where is the evidence?”

but:

“What happened to the evidence that once existed?”

📌 When the original books disappear, fragments become witnesses.

#Saqifah #IslamicHistory #HistoricalCriticism #FāṭimahAlZahrā #ImamAli #IbnAlKalbi #HishamAlKalbi #AbanIbnUthman #Ridda #HistoryOfIslam #LostBooks #AhlulBayt

https://eitaa.com/Sahebmedia1/2741

🆔 @rahyafte_en

They had turbah (prayer stones), performed qunut, and said:

“Allahu Akbar!”

I thought:

“Oh no… they're Shi'a. What am I going to do?” 😳

I remember that they would go to Masjid al-Zahra for Friday prayers. It was completely different from what I had experienced in Germany.

They performed qunut, and I did not understand what they were doing.

I stopped going to Friday prayers with my father.

He became somewhat worried. He had certain thoughts going through his mind. Perhaps he wondered whether his son might be one of those “terrorists.”

He said:

“You're Sunni. You want to kill all of us.”

I replied:

“No, no. I would love to come to the mosque, but I can't pray the way you do.”

🌟 My Brother and the Ahl al-Bayt

The first time I saw a photograph of my brother, I saw a special light in his face.

He looked like the moon—Masha'Allah. 🌕✨

I asked my father:

“Who is he?”

He told me:

“He's your brother.”

My brother was very spiritual, patient, and devoted to the Ahl al-Bayt, peace be upon them.

Little by little, he introduced me to Shiism and the school of the Ahl al-Bayt.

He taught me Salat al-Layl (the Night Prayer).

The Night Prayer creates a powerful connection between a person and God. While everyone else is asleep, a person stands before Allah and privately speaks with Him.

🤍 “I Am With You”

One night, I was alone in my room. At that time, I felt extremely lonely.

Then I heard a voice in my soul saying:

“I am with you.”

I felt those words in my heart.

With my entire being, I experienced God's mercy and kindness.

I fell to the ground and began to cry.

I could not stop.

I truly felt God's presence with all my heart and soul. 🤲😭

When Muharram came, I began listening online to lectures about Muharram and learning about the differences between Sunni and Shi'a Islam.

Little by little, my understanding of the school of the Ahl al-Bayt (peace be upon them) became complete.

🕊️ A journey that began with a search for a father ultimately became a journey toward God.

From Christianity → to Islam → and ultimately to the Ahl al-Bayt.

Sometimes, the search for where we come from leads us to discover where we truly belong. ❤️

#Islam #ShiaIslam #AhlulBayt #Muharram #Ramadan #YasinRashid #ConvertToIslam #IslamicStories

🆔 @rahyafte_en

Interestingly, when asked about the greatest challenge of becoming a Twelver Shia, the person did not mention learning Arabic, attending a mosque or changing their daily lifestyle.

They identified something much more fundamental:

Going from having no belief in God to having an absolute belief in God.

That is a much bigger psychological and philosophical transition than simply changing religious affiliation.

For someone raised as an atheist, the starting point is not:

“Which religion is true?”

It can be:

“Is there anything beyond the material world at all?”

Only after that question is answered does the next one become possible.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

🧩 What can we actually learn from this story?

We should be careful not to turn one person's experience into a general rule.

This is a single self-reported testimony, posted anonymously on Reddit.

It cannot tell us how common this pathway is.

But it does give us a fascinating example of one possible route:

Atheism → Theism → Islam → Shi‘ism

And it shows that conversion can involve multiple separate intellectual decisions rather than one single leap.

First:

“I believe God exists.”

Then:

“I believe Islam is true.”

And finally:

“I believe Twelver Shi‘ism best explains Islam.”

Three different questions.

Three different stages of the journey.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

🌱 A second recent example

Interestingly, another Reddit testimony from May 2025 describes a similar journey.

That person says they were raised by atheist parents and began searching for spiritual answers as a teenager.

After exploring several religions, they came to believe in monotheism and eventually Islam.

They then chose Twelver Shi‘ism, mentioning the stories of Sayyidah Fatimah, the Twelve Successors, Karbala, and an interest in Iranian culture among the factors that drew them toward Shi‘ism.

Again, this is an individual testimony — not statistical evidence.

But having two recent, independent personal accounts with a similar broad structure is noteworthy.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

💭 Perhaps the most interesting question isn't “Why did they become Muslim?”

It's this:

Why didn't their search end with belief in God?

For these individuals, becoming convinced that God exists was only the beginning.

They continued searching for answers about:

Who is God?
What is revelation?
Why Islam?
Who should lead the Muslim community?
What happened after the Prophet Muhammad?
What is the significance of Ghadir Khumm?
What is the role of the Ahl al-Bayt?

And eventually, their answers led them toward Twelver Shi‘ism.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

📌 SOURCE
Personal AMA published on Reddit:
May 26, 2026

🔗 Full testimony and Q&A:
https://www.reddit.com/r/religion/comments/1toicd6/i_am_a_former_atheist_who_has_converted_to/

A related 2025 testimony:
https://www.reddit.com/r/progressive_islam/comments/1kojtwh/i_was_raised_atheist_and_that_was_what_i_believed/

📚 For academic context:
Akif Tahiiev, “Becoming a Shia in Russia: Reasons for Conversion to Shi‘ism in Russia”, Anthropological Journal of European Cultures, 2025.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/399917744_Becoming_a_Shia_in_Russia_Reasons_for_Conversion_to_Shi%27ism_in_Russia

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Sometimes a religious journey doesn't begin with faith.

Sometimes it begins with a question.

And sometimes one question leads to another — until a person finds an answer they are willing to build their life around.

#Islam #ShiaIslam #Shiism #TwelverShia #Conversion #Atheism #Faith #IslamicStudies #AhlulBayt

🆔 @rahyafte_en